SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 84
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
The	CaseCrackers
1
Caroline	Ghazzaoui Sebastian	Spittler Michael	Fehlmann David	Gorgan
The	Beatles	would	be	rather	confused	and	unhappy	about	their	revenues
living	in	today’s	world	of	streaming	providers	
2
Challenge Solution Result
Streaming	service	providerThe	Beatles
Spotify	does	not	compensate	
us	appropriately…
How	can	we	get	profitable	in	
the	future?
3
Challenge Solution Result
Challenge Solution Result
Spotify
Memberships
Spotify
Ticketing
Spotify
Sessions
Convert	Spotify’s	users	
into	paying	members
Either	paying	1€ to	
extend	trial	period	or	
paying	10€ to	subscribe
The	premium	service	
does	not	add	enough	
value
Spotify	is	not	appealing	
enough	 for	right	holders
Offer	a	ticket	selling	
service	with	benefits	for	
subscribers	and	artist
Offer	live	streams	of	
festivals/sessions
only	for	subscribers	
Executive	summary
• 5,5m	new	premium	subs
• 32m	new	basic	members
• generating		€365,2m
• 2,8m	new	premium	subs
• generating	€184,29m
• 1,09m	new	premium	subs
• generating	€65,448m
Although	streaming	does	not	hold	the	largest	share	among	the	music
industry’s	revenue	yet,	it	catches	up	with	growth	rates	of	50%	p.a.
4
• Music	downloads	still	biggest	share
• Streaming	only	makes	up	27%	of	the	current	
digital	music	revenues
• BUT:	Growth	of	51.3%	in	only	1	year
Challenge Solution Result
Fortier	(2014),	http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/statistiques/culture/optique-culture_an.html
IFPI	(2014),	http://www.ifpi.org/downloads/Digital-Music-Report-2014.pdf
Share	from	digital	music	in	global	market
• Digital	music	revenues	growing	heavily
(by	48%	since	2008)
• Accounting	for	€5.31bn	in	2013
Global	revenue	in	digital	music
67%
27%
6%
downloading	music	files streaming other
Revenues	in	the	music	industry	have	decreased	overall	since	1997,	however,
digital	music	revenues	did	partially	balance	the	losses
5
• Digital	music	revenues	taking	over	physical	sales
revenues	(by	48%	since	2008)
• Accounting	for	€5.31bn	in	2013
• In	general	decreasing	revenues	from	the	music	
industry	
• However,	digital	revenues	do	not	outweigh	losses	of	
physical	sales	yet	
Challenge Solution Result
King	(2013),	http://qz.com/56998/the-music-industry-grew-last-year-for-the-first-time-since-1998/
Development	of	revenue	in	music	industry	[in	€M]Composition	of	global	music	sales
1997 2001 2005 2011
6
What	does	it	take	for	Spotify	to	achieve	break	even?
Net	income	of	Spotify	has	continuously	been	negative	in	its	history
Challenge Solution Result
-2000
-1600
-1200
-800
-400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2018
million	euros
revenue operating	costs net	income
• Current	net	loss:	
€179,1m
• Spotify	must	pay	70%	of	
revenues	to	right	holders
• Consequence:	
Spotify	does	not	only	
need	to	make	additional						
€179m	but	€597m	
Statista	(2015),	http://www.statista.com/statistics/244990/spotifys-revenue-and-net-income/
7
162,3ml	€ losses	in	2014	à 541ml	€ additional	revenues	- 378ml	€ additional	expenses	(70%)	=	+162ml	€ net	income		
-2000
-1600
-1200
-800
-400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2018
million	euros
revenue operating	costs net	income
It	takes	Spotify	additional	€597m	of	revenues	in	order	to	reach	break-even
Challenge Solution Result
Statista	(2015),	http://www.statista.com/statistics/244990/spotifys-revenue-and-net-income/
• Current	net	loss:	
€179,1m
• Spotify	must	pay	70%	of	
revenues	to	right	holders
• Consequence:	
Spotify	does	not	only	
need	to	make	additional						
€179m	but	€597m	
Net	income	of	Spotify	has	continuously	been	negative	in	its	history
The	major	weakness	of	Spotify	is	that	it	has	in	all	its	history	always
faced	negative	net	income
8
• Payments	to	right	holders	make	up	approx.	62% of	
Spotify’s	 expenses
• 70%	of	total	revenues	go	to	right	holders	
• 74%	of	free	users	only	contribute	to	10% of
Spotify’s	 revenue in	2014	
• 26%	Premium	users	contribute	to	90%	of	
Spotify’s	 revenues in	2014
Challenge Solution Result
The	Guardian	(2015),	http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/11/spotify-financial-results-streaming-music-profitable
756
486
Payments	to	right	holders Fixed	costs
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Share	of	free	/	Premium	subscribers Share	of	revenue	they	contribute
Premium	users Free	Users
Number	of	customer	types	and	their	according	
revenue	generated	in	2015
Cost	structure	of	Spotify in	2015	[in	€M]
9
Challenge Solution Result
Challenge Solution Result
Spotify
Memberships
Spotify
Ticketing
Spotify
Sessions
Convert	Spotify’s	users	
into	paying	members
Either	paying	1€ to	
extend	trial	period	or	
paying	10€ to	subscribe
The	premium	service	
does	not	add	enough	
value
Spotify	is	not	appealing	
enough	 for	right	holders
Offer	a	ticket	selling	
service	with	benefits	for	
subscribers	and	artist
Offer	live	streams	of	
festivals/sessions
only	for	subscribers	
Executive	summary
• 5,5m	new	premium	subs
• 32m	new	basic	members
• generating		€365,2m
• 2,8m	new	premium	subs
• generating	€184,29m
• 1,09m	new	premium	subs
• generating	€65,448m
Spotify	must	improve	its	pricing	structure	as	well	as	increase	its
attractiveness	in	order	to	reach	the	main	objective;	break-even
Change pricing
structure
Increase of
attractiveness
Livestreams
Ticketing
solution
Free version
Premium
version
Break Even Partnering
Joint-Ventures
M&A
Challenge Solution Result
Organizing own
festivals
IPO
Adding videos
• A	different	pricing	structure	will	allow	Spotify	to	increase
the	subscriptions
• Increasing subscription	price is	too	risky
• Decreasing subscription	price does	not meet	our	goal
• Partnering (joint-ventures,	M&A	or	IPO)	does	not solve
profitability problem
• Spotify	must	work	on	its	attractiveness	for	right	holders	
and	subscribers
• Organizing	own	festivals and	adding	music	videos	would	
be	too	expensive (huge	server	costs)
VALUATION
10
• A	different	pricing	structure	will	allow	Spotify	to	increase
the	subscriptions
• Increasing subscription	price is	too	risky
• Decreasing subscription	price does	not meet	our	goal
• Partnering (joint-ventures,	M&A	or	IPO)	does	not solve
profitability problem
• Spotify	must	work	on	its	attractiveness	for	right	holders	
and	subscribers
• Organizing	own	festivals and	adding	music	videos	would	
be	too	expensive (huge	server	costs)
11
Change pricing
structure
Increase of
attractiveness
Livestreams
Ticketing
solution
Free version
Premium
version
Break Even Partnering
Joint-Ventures
M&A
VALUATION
Challenge Solution Result
Organizing own
festivals
IPO
Adding videos
Spotify	must	improve	its	pricing	structure	as	well	as	increase	its
attractiveness	in	order	to	reach	the	main	objective;	break-even
12
VISION
Challenge Solution Result
Changing	the	price	structure	will	help	to	increase	Spotify’s	revenues
Spotify	still	pays	small	pay-outs	to	right	holders	
compared	with	other	streaming	platforms
13
Challenge Solution Result
Status	quo:
• Spotify	spending	 70%	of	its	gross	
income
• Right	holders	December	2013:	
• Spotify pays	between	
€0,0057	- €0,0079	per	stream
• iTunes pays €0,65	per	track
How	will	Spotify	compensate
right	holders	better	while
aiming	for	profitability?
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
Per-stream	payout(€)
Average	per-stream	payouts
The	minority	of	premium	users	contributes	practically
all	the	revenues	of	Spotify
14
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Share	of	free	/	Premium	
subscribers
Share	of	revenue	they	contribute
Number	of	customer	types	and	their	
according	revenue	generated	in	2015
Premium	users Free	Users
Challenge Solution Result
26% of	premium	users	contributed	90%	
of	Spotify’s	revenues in	2015
In	order	to	be	profitable	there	are	
two	solutions	to	generate	revenue:
• Generate	more	revenue	by	ads
• Increase	annual	subscriptions	
Premium
14
We	created	an	online	survey	in	order	to	find	out	the	willingness	to	pay	of	
Spotify	customers,	if	there	would	not	be	a	free	membership	anymore
15
Questions	asked:
1) Would	you	pay	CHF12.95	/	€9.99	for	Spotify	if	you	could	not	
use	it	for	free anymore?
2)	If	not,	what	other	channel	would	you	use	to	listen	to	music?
Results:	(217	participants)
Challenge Solution Result
71% 29%
No
Yes
Youtube Apple	Music iTunes
Soundcloud Torrents Other
New	pricing	strategy	will	help	Spotify	to	get	extra	revenues
16
Premium	
membership:
€10	every	month
Basic	membership:
€1	every	3	month
Free	account
Challenge Solution Result
• Basic	membership	
with	low	fee
replacing	free	
account
• Basic	fees	shall	
outweigh	losses	
from	less	ad-
revenues	
• Incentive to	
subscribe	for	
premium is	higher
New	pricing	strategy	will	require	at	least	30	million	basic	memberships	in	
order	to	outweigh	losses	from	less	ad-revenue
17
Challenge Solution Result
75	million	
users
20	million	
premium	subs
55	million
free	users
Assumption:	Spotify’s	revenue	in	2015:	€1.428bn
• Revenue	from	premium	subs:	€1.296bn
• Revenue	from	free	users:	€132m
Old	pricing	strategy New	pricing	strategy
?	million	
users
?	million	
premium	subs
?	million
basic	members
Basic	fees	shall	outweigh	losses	from	less	ad-revenues:
• 30m	basic	membership	users	required to	achieve	
break	even	(outweigh	losses)
Ten	percent	of	the	current	free	users	subscribing	for	Spotify	
will	increase	its	revenues	by	358,4ml	€ within	the	next	3	year
18
Challenge Solution Result
75	million	
users
20	million	
premium	subs
55	million
free	users
Assumption:	Spotify’s	revenue	in	2015:	€1.428bn
• Revenue	from	premium	subs:	€1.296bn
• Revenue	from	free	users:	€132m
Old	pricing	strategy New	pricing	strategy
55,5	million	
users
25,5	million	
premium	subs
32	million
basic	members
Assumption:	Spotify’s	revenue	in	2018:	€1.7932bn
• Revenue	from	subscriptions:	€1.6524bn
• Revenue	from	basic	members:	€140,8m
+	€365,2m
1919
The	pricing	strategy	increases	Spotify’s	revenue	by	€365,2m
Challenge Solution Result
5,5m	new	premium	subs &	
32	million	basic	members
through	Spotify	Memberships
€356,4m	revenues
+	€140,8m	revenues
€132m	revenues	
(no	ads	for	free	users)
€365,2m	net	revenue
In	3	years,	Spotify	will	become	one	of	the	biggest	online	tour	ticket	resellers
20
Challenge Solution Result
SPOTIFY	OFFERS	
THE	TICKET	
PLATFORM	AT	A	
LOW	PROFIT	
MARGIN
IT	IS	CONVENIENT	
FOR	ALL	THE	
ARTISTS	TO	SELL	
THROUGH	SPOTIFY
OTHER	
COMPETITORS	
CANNOT	AFFORD	
SUCH	A	LOW	
COMMISSION
THIS	WILL	GIVE	
SPOTIFY	LEVERAGE	
TO	NEGOTIATE	
THAT	THE	TICKETS	
ARE	AVAILABLE	 ON	
SPOTIFY	EARLIER
INCENTIVE	FOR	
USERS	TO	BECOME	
SUBSCRIBERS
Challenge Solution Result
20
Spotify	Ticketing	will	gain	leverage	by	requiring	a	low	profit	margin	for	the	
service	and	then	use	it	negotiate	tickets	available	earlier	on	Spotify
SPOTIFY	
TICKET	
SELLING	
PLATFORM
RIGHT	HOLDERS PREMIUM	USERS
Save	money
Reach	a	lot	of	fans
The	more	tickets	sold	through	
Spotify	the	better
Get	tickets	in	advance
Feeds	about	the	tours
Integrated	calendar	
Direct	payment
ü
ü
ü
ü
ü
ü
Spotify	becomes	the	first	ticket	platform	
The	users	will	have	an	incentive	to	become	premium
More	appealing	for	right	holders/artists	because	of	a	“self-marketing”	function
ü
ü
ü
ü
Challenge Solution Result
Artists	can	sell	their	tickets	with	less	costs	and	premium	users	can	purchase	
tickets	in	advance	while	Spotify	gains	more	subscriptions
22
*	11%	for	the	first	50’000,	and	then	6%
General	idea
• Possibility	for	the	artists	to	sell	tickets	via	Spotify
• Spotify	will	offer	the	service	for	a	7%	profit	margin
• Negotiation	(tickets	available	two	days	in	advance)
Challenge Solution Result
23https://seatgeek.com/tba/music/concert-ticket-fees/
Spotify	is	able	to	position	itself	as	a	cheap	and	smart	solution	for	artists	
to	sell	their	concert	tickets	– giving	an	incentive	for	users	to	subscribe
0
5
10
15
Ebay*
Spotify
Ticket	Network
Ticket	Liquidator
Vividseats
StubHub
Ticketsnow
Razogator
Profit	margin of	various online	ticketing providers
Detailed	concept
• Everyone is	able	to	buy	tickets	through	 the	platform
• Only	subscribers	will	have	access	to	the	pre-sale
Consequence
• Incentive for	users	to	become	subscribers
Spotify	will	integrate	the	ticketing	into	its	platform	– user-friendly	ticketing
24
What	Spotify	offers…
• Promotion of	World	Tours
• Ticket	selling
• Spotify	exclusive	feeds
Challenge Solution Result
How	users	will	proceed…
• Acquired	via	platform	
• Buyers	receive	electronic	ticket
Spotify	can	implement	the	ticketing	without	incurring	high	costs
25
Challenge Solution Result
Software	development*
§ Focus	the	development	 task	force	on	the	software
Sales
§ Adding	 ticket	possibility	in	pre-existing	contracts*
§ Creation	of	ticketing	departments	
Marketing*
§ Marketing	through	 social	media	and	press	releases
Expenses	and	
resources	
allocation	for	
Spotify	Ticketing
Total	cost	
per	year	=	
€1,225,760
*	These	tasks	are	going	to	be	implemented	by	already	existing	employees	– therefore	there	is	no	additional	costs
The	financial	goal	of	the	ticketing	platform	is	to	be	break-even
26
Challenge Solution Result
Revenue	possibility	from	ticketing
• Average	seats	per	concerts:	13’000	
• Average	ticket	price	for	main	artists:	78	€
• By	selling	10% of	the	tickets	through	Spotify	
the	revenue	is	7’098€ for	a	single	concerts
• In	order	to	cover	its	costs	Spotify	has	to	be	
able	to	sell	10%	of	the	tickets	for	575	concerts	
around	the	world
10%	of	the	tickets	of	575	
concerts	successfully	sold	to	
reach	the	break	even	point	
Key	Message
The	ticketing	will	make	Spotify	attractive	for	all	stakeholders	
27
Challenge Solution Result
Benefit	for	artists Benefit	for	premium	subscribers
• Promotion	 of	the	tour	through	Spotify
• Advantage	rate	of	7%
• Possibility	to	save	up	to	3’194’919	€ per	tour
• Exclusive	insights	feeds	from	the	artists
• Possibility	of	purchasing	the	tickets	two	days	in	
advance
• Direct	payment	possibility
• E-tickets	directly	on	your	e-mail
Premium
2828
Through	ticketing,	Spotify	will	generate	€184,29m	net	revenue
Challenge Solution Result
2,8m	new	subscribers through	
Spotify	Ticketing
€181,44m	revenues
€1,225m	implementation	costs
€184,29m	net	revenue
€4,083m	(margin	575	concerts)
Spotify	implementation	is	based	on	convincing	artists	and	develop	the	software
29
Challenge Solution Result
Add	clauses	to	contract
Develop	the	software
Create	ticket	Sales	Department
Instruction	of	existing	employees
Start	offering	the	service	
1
2
3
4
5
Challenge Solution Result
Spotify	can	greatly	benefit	by	becoming	a	major	festival	hub
30
Spotify	needs	more	unique	premium-only	features
31
• Pricing structured	to	
enable	profitability,	
but	important to	grow
premium	base
• So	far	only	ad-free,	
offline	mode,	
enhanced	sound	
quality	and	
connectivity	features	
only	for	premium
• More	features	needed	
that	aren‘t	totally	
focused	on	sound
Challenge Solution Result
Spotify	premium	will	offer	more	benefits	to	customers,	such	as	Spotify	
Ticketing	and	Spotify	Sessions
32
No	more	ads.
You	won’t	be	interrupted.
Tons	of	music,	instantly.
Hear	any	song	you	want.
Take	your	collection	offline.
Listen	to	songs	anywhere.
Easy	on	the	ears.
Even	more	sound	quality.
Spotify	Ticketing.
Come	even	closer	to	the	artists.
Spotify	Sessions.
Get	exclusive	insights.
Challenge Solution Result
Spotify	(2015),	https://www.spotify.com/us/student/
33
Challenge Solution Result
• While	recorded	music	
revenues	are	going	down, live	
music	revenues	are	growing
• Rising	number	of	festivals	and	
concerts	with	better	
technology	and	new	formats
Live	music	revenue	is	hugely	growing,	so	are	concerts	and	festivals
Trojan360	(2014),	http://www.trojan360.com/the-power-of-live-music-2/
Growing	live	music	revenues
34
• Tomorrowland biggest	
electronic	music	festival	
in	the	world
• Grew	4500%	in	
attendance	since	its	
inception	in	2005
• Very	young	audience,	
same	as	Spotify
• Online	livestreams	so	far	
for	free
Electronic music	festivals	such	as	Tomorrowland are	a	success	story
34
Challenge Solution Result
0
50.000
100.000
150.000
200.000
250.000
300.000
350.000
400.000
450.000
+4500%
20152014201320122010 20112007 2008 20092006
Attendance	Growth	Tomorrowland
Dancing	Astronaut	(2013),	http://www.dancingastronaut.com/2013/07/through-the-looking-glass-the-history-of-tomorrowland/
YourEDM (2015),	http://www.youredm.com/2015/07/16/tomorrowland-past-present-future/
3535
Spotify	Sessions	is	the	way	to	integrate	festival	experiences	into	Spotify
Challenge Solution Result
• Own	subpage	on	the	
mobile	and	desktop	app
• Promoting upcoming	
festivals and	nearby
concerts (direct	link	to	
buy	festival	tickets	and	to	
Spotify	Tickets)
• Live	events	on	soundless	
auto-play
• Audio	(listen)	feature
3636
All	sessions	will	be	Spotify-exclusive
Challenge Solution Result
Live	Sessions	with	artists
• In	general	the	livestreams on	Spotify	are	live	and
should	be	exclusive	
• The	goal	is	to	make	users	feel	like	they‘re	missing	out	
on	something	if	they	don‘t	register
Spotify	can	implement	the	ticketing	without	incurring	high	costs
37
Challenge Solution Result
Software	development*
• Forming	a	developer	squad	to	develop	livestreaming	
software
Sales
• Hiring	new	salespeople
• Negotiate	exclusive	livestream	deals		
Marketing*
• Marketing	through	 social	media	and	press	releases
Total	cost	
per	year	=	
€5.184m	
Expenses	and	
resources	
allocation	for	
Spotify	Sessions
*	These	tasks	are	going	to	be	implemented	by	already	existing	employees	– therefore	there	are	no	additional	costs
3838
We	will	acquire	big	festivals	first	and	then	implement	our	own	solution
Challenge Solution Result
Hire	salespeople for	partnerships
Acquire exclusive partnerships	with	festivals/artists	
(with	already	existing	livestreams)
Establish Spotify	as	known	livestream partner
Finish	development	of	own	livestream	software
Offering	software	and	expanding	to	festivals/artists	
without	existing livestreams
1
2
3
4
5
3939
Spotify	Sessions	will	generate	€65,448m	net	revenue
Challenge Solution Result
1,09m	new	subscribers	through	
Spotify	Sessions
€70,632m	revenues
€5,184m	costs for	Spotify	
Sessions
€65,448m	net	revenue
Spotify	will	achieve	break	even	by	generating	€597m	of	additional	revenue
40
Challenge Solution Result
Financial	Impact
Additional	€365,2m
Additional	€184,29m
(2,8m	additional	subscribers)	
Additional	€65,448m
(1,09m	additional	subscribers)	
€597m
41
Challenge Solution Result
Challenge Solution Result
Spotify
Memberships
Spotify
Ticketing
Spotify
Sessions
Convert	Spotify’s	users	
into	paying	members
Either	paying	1€ to	
extend	trial	period	or	
paying	10€ to	subscribe
The	premium	service	
does	not	add	enough	
value
Spotify	is	not	appealing	
enough	 for	right	holders
Offer	a	ticket	selling	
service	with	benefits	for	
subscribers	and	artist
Offer	live	streams	of	
festivals/sessions
only	for	subscribers	
Executive	summary
• 5,5m	new	premium	subs
• 32m	new	basic	members
• generating		€365,2m
• 2,8m	new	premium	subs
• generating	€184,29m
• 1,09m	new	premium	subs
• generating	€65,448m
We	identified	the	risks	of	mainly	having	too	little	impact	
that	have	to	be	taken	into	account
Risk Probability Impact Mitigation
• Too	few	free	users	
subscribing
• Users	going	to	the	
competitors
• Further	improvement of	Premium	version
• Still	offering	functions	and	services	that
competitors	do	not
• Customers	do	not	buy	
tickets	via	Spotify
• Artist	do	not	want	to	sell	
their	tickets	via	Spotify
• The	platform is	user-friendly	and	they	can	
buy	tickets	in	advance
• Profit	margin	is	lower	and	Spotify	also	offers	
promotion	through	the	platform	(feeds)
• Users	prefer	to	watch	
concerts	live
• Artists	won’t	risk	to	loose	
income	from	concerts
• Premium	offer	– even	if	users	didn’t	want	to	
use	it	– will	still	buy	it
• Installed	measures	will	give additional	
incentives	and	special	deals	to	artists
Low Medium High
Spotify
Memberships
Spotify	
Ticketing
Spotify
Sessions
Challenge Solution Result
42
Our	solution	will	achieve	a	break-even	until	the	end	of	2018
43
Corporate	P&L	(million €) 2015 2016 2017 2018
Revenue
Base revenue
Extra	revenue	from	Spotify	Memberships
Extra	revenue	from	Spotify	Ticketing
Extra	revenue	through	margin
Extra	revenue	from	Spotify	Sessions
1428
-
-
-
-
-
1682,783
1428
146,08
90,72
4,083
13,09
1888,748
1682,783
127,82
54,432
4,083
19,63
2053,139
1888,748
91,3
36,288
4,083
32,72
(Cost)
Fixed	Costs
Royalties
Extra	Labour
Partnerships
(1607,1)
(607,5)
(996,6)
-
-
(1791,85786)
(607,5)
(1177,9481)
(1,40976)
(5)
(1936,0336)
(607,5)
(1322,1236)
(1,40976)
(5)
(2051,10706)
(607,5)
(1437,1973)
(1,40976)
(5)
Operating	income (179,1) (109,0786) (47,2856) 2,03194
(Corporate	Tax	of	22%	) - - - 0,4470268
Net	income (179,1) (109,0786) (47,2856) 1,5849132
Net	income	margin (12,5%) 0,077%
Challenge Solution Result
Trading	Economics,	http://www.tradingeconomics.com/sweden/corporate-tax-rate
Artist	benefit	from	Spotify’s	overall	solutions	as	revenue	is	generally	increasing
44
Challenge Solution Result
Artist	benefit	from	extra	€597m	revenues	caused	by	the	pricing
• 70%	*	€597m	=	€418,6m	additionally	paid	for	royalties
• €1,4146bn	instead	of	€996m	for	royalties
756
523
301
131
996
20182015
Money	spend
on	royalties	(in	m	€)
+40%
2011 2012 20142013
1 415
45
Action 2016 2017 2018
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Change	Software
Communication
Contracts	creation
Software development
Sales	Department
Instruct	employees
Partnerships
Establish	the	brand
Software	Development
Contracts	Creation
Expansion
Spotify	
Memberships
Spotify	
Tickets
Spotify	
Sessions
Preparation/Planning
Implementation
Our	implementation	starts	in	Q1	2016	and	will	be	mainly	
finished	after	Q2	2017
Challenge Solution Result
Q&A
46
Challenge Solution Result
????
Questions	&	Answers
BACKUP
ANALYSIS
CD	sales	in	North	America	have	declined	significantly	during	the	last	15	years
49
• CD	sales	dropped	by	73%	in	North	America	since	
2000
• Physical	music	is	loosing	relevance
• Music	industry	facing	problems	with	monetizing
CD	sales	in	North	America
A	minority	of	Premium	users	contributes	practically	all	of	Spotify’s revenues
50
Spotify	comprises	most	Premium	users	in	
comparison	to	its	competitors
26%	of	Premium	users	contributed	90%	of	
Spotify’s	revenues	in	2014
0 100 200 300
# countries
#	songs	[in	mio]
#	Premium	users	
[in	mio]
#	Total	users	[in	
mio]
Deezer
Pandora
Spotify
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Share	of	free	/	Premium	subscribers Share	of	revenue	they	contribute
Number	of	customer	types	and	their	
according	revenue	generated	in	2014
Premium	users Free	Users
Spotify does	not	only	generates	significantly	more	revenues	but	also	by	far	
the	highest	net	loss	compared	to	its	most	relevant	competitors
51
However,	Spotify	by	far	has	the	largest	net	
loss	compared	to	competitors
Spotify	generated	most	revenues	in	
comparison	to	its	competitors	in	2014
Net	profit	(loss)	2014	[in	€M]
2
-165
-9
Sources
http://www.finanzen.net/bilanz_guv/Pandora
http://winfuture.de/news,87040.html
http://www.nzz.ch/finanzen/aktien/deezer-will-bis-ende-oktober-an-die-boerse-1.18630132
Revenue	2014	[in	€M]
920.8
143
1,080
Analysis	of	music	streaming	market	shows	that	the	streaming	market	itself	
is	already	highly	consolidated	but	major	threat	comes	from	illegal	platforms
52
Threat of Substitute
Products
Music streaming is the
cheapest legal source
of music for customers
Bargaining power (suppliers)
Doesn’t depend on retailers and
programmers are easily
available
Threat of new
entrants
Entrants must take lots
of legal issues into
account; existing firms
already well
established
Industry rivalry
Music streaming market is still growing
Bargaining power (buyers)
Customers have a lot of legal
and illegal alternatives to
Spotify
Analysis	of	online	ticket	sales	market	shows	that	it	holds	numerous	
advantages	compared	to	the	music	streaming	market	
53
Threat of Substitute
Products
Music streaming is the
cheapest legal source
of music for customers
Bargaining power (suppliers)
No dependence on retailers and
programmers are easily
available
Threat of new
entrants
Limited since
conclusion of contracts
with right holders is
complicated
Industry rivalry
Comparably few providers of services
the like
Bargaining power (buyers)
Hardly organized customers
and
The	USP	of	Spotify	is	its	large	user	base	as	well	as	new	opportunities	in
the	sale	of	concert	tickets	online
54
▪ User	base	comprises	
75M	people
▪ Contracts	with	
multiple	right	holders	
on	global	scale
▪ Technology	enabling	
instant	music	
experience	as	if	
saved	on	hard-drive
▪ Potent	and	dedicated	
investors
▪ Brand	partnerships
Strenghts Weaknesses Threats Opportunities
▪ Spotify has	never	
generated	a	net	
profit	so	far
▪ Free	customers	
contribute	less	than	
10%	p.a.	of	revenues
▪ Only	25%	of	
Premium	users	
generate	90%	of	
revenues
▪ Artists	are	
withdrawing	their	
songs	from	streaming	
platforms	due	to	low	
payment
▪ Development of	
Spotify hindered	due		
to	compulsory	
contracts	with	right	
holders
▪ Music	streaming	
outperforms	
download	of	songs	
and	albums
▪ In	parallel,	the	
concert	market	&	
thus	also	the	online	
sale	of	tickets	is	
booming
Copyright	issues	provide	an	effective	entry	barrier	for	new	competitors	on	
the	music	streaming	market
55
▪ Venture-capitalists	
are	numerous	 and	
willed	to	invest	in	
start-ups	like	Spotify
all	over	the	world
Economic	implications Social	implications Technological implications Legal	implications
▪ Spotify’s users	are	
rather	young	while	
demography	 tends	to	
more	elderly	people
▪ Programmers	 can	
nowadays	be	found	
all	over	the	world	
▪ Internet	technologies
develop	further	
rapidly	&	Spotify
must	be	capable	of	
adapting
▪ Spotify must	always	
consider	the	reaction	
of	right	holders	in	all	
what	it	does	due	to	
copyright	law
▪ In	parallel,	it	
constitutes	entry	
barriers	for	new	
competitors
Back	up	- Comparison	of	the	Main	Music	Streaming	Services
56
Percentage	of	paying	subscribers	on	toal users
• Spotify 27,0%
• Deezer 38,0%
• Pandora 1,2%
• Beatsmusic 100,0%
• Kkbox 20,0%
• Wiwmp 100,0%
-2.000.000	
0	
2.000.000	
4.000.000	
6.000.000	
8.000.000	
10.000.000	
12.000.000	
14.000.000	
16.000.000	
18.000.000	
20.000.000	
22.000.000	
0	 1	 2	 3	 4	 5	 6	 7	 8	 9	 10	 11	 12	 13	 14	 15	
Kkbox
BeatsmusicWiMp
Cost	Premium	service
Subscribers
Pandora
Spotify
Deezer
BACKUP
57
PRICING
Data	on	customers/revenue	origin	(I/II)
59
• 2013: 747	million	€ revenues	in	2013	(24	ml	active	users)
• 91%	from	subscriptions
• 9%	from	advertisement
• 2014:	1.08	billion	€ revenues	in	2014	(60	million	users,	15mil	subscriber)
• 1.08bn	€ x	0,9	=	972ml	from	subscriptions
à1.08bn	€ x	0,9	/	15ml	/	10€ =	6,48	month	of	subscriptions
• 1.08bn	€ x	0,1	=	108ml	from	ads
à108ml	€ /	45ml	=	2,4€
• 2015:	75	million	users	(20	million	subscribers)	
• 20ml	(subscribers)	x	10€ x	6,48	=	1.29bn	€
• 55ml	(free	users)	x	2,4€ =	132ml	€
Revenues	in	2015:	1.296bn	+	132ml	=	1.428bn	€
Challenge Solution Result
Data	on	customers/revenue	origin	(II/II)
60
• Basic	fees	shall	outweigh	losses	from	less	ad-revenues
• X*2,4€ +	x*1€*2	=	132ml	€ (2*3	month	usage)
• X	=	30ml	
(30ml*2,4€ +	30ml*1€*2	=	132ml	€)
• 2015:	55,5	million	users	(25,5	million	subscribers)	(55ml*0,1	=	+5,5ml)
• 25,5ml	(subscribers)	x	10€ x	6,48	=	1.6524bn	€
• 32ml	(basic	members)	=	132ml	€
Revenues	in	2015:	1.6524bn	€ +	132ml	€ =	1.7864bn	€
Challenge Solution Result
What	does	it	take	Spotify	to	achieve	a	break	even?
61
Challenge Solution Result
• 2014:	162,3	ml	losses
• We	need	541’000’000	additional	revenues	in	
2015	so	that	70%	of	this	number	 goes	to	
artists	and	30	%	of	this	revenue	(162,3ml)	 will	
stay	with	Spotify
Royalties	in	detail
62
Challenge Solution Result
TICKETING
Back	up	– Ticketing	implementation	plan
64
Challenge Solution Result
Offer	the	service	to	major	artists	first
• Own	world	tours	– at	least	60	Stops
• Music	Award	Nomination
• Strongly	followed	on	social	media
• Strongly	followed	on	Spotify
• Big	profit	from	album
• Since	spotify is	able	to	segment	its	
customers,	when	a	world	tour	is	up,	the	
service	will	be	able	to	advertise	the	event	in	
the	country/area
• Major	artist	usually	fill	up	big	concerts	hall,	
therefore	we	can	profit	more	- having	a	7%	
profit	margin
Back	Up	– Implementation	of	the	two	new	offices
65
Challenge Solution Result
Creation	of	one	offices	in	the	USA	and	Europe:
- Two	partner	implementatoion project	manager	 105’208	€ /	year
- 18	external	relations	and	sales 56’400	€ /	year
- Support	 is	going	to	go	through	 Spotify
- Already	existing	product	development	 department	is	going	to	work	on	this	
Total	cost	per	year	=	1’225’760	€
Benefits	for	the	artist
66
Challenge Solution Result
Revenue	benefit	for	the	artist
• Spotify	has	a	profit	margin	of	7%	instead	of	
the	average	11,5	%	in	the	ticketing	industry	
• 4%	additional	profit	margin	for	artists
• Average	seats	per	concerts:	13’000	
• Average	ticket	price	for	main	artists:	83	$
• 173	concerts	minimum	per	year
13’000*0,1*83$*0,04=	 4316$
4316$/0,0052	=	828’406	additional	streams
4316$*173	=	764’668$
=	additional	1’066’669$	of	revenues	if	only	made	
by	spotify
Back	Up	- Spotify	has	to	make	its	service	appealing	for	right	holders
67
Streaming service payout Urgent needs
Streaming platforms are not
profitable for right holders
• Between	0.006	and	0.0084	
each	time	a	song	is	played
• Between	6	and	8	when	a	title	
is	heard	1000	times
• Royalities paid	by	Spotify	 are	
very	low
• To	equal	1	iTunes	purchase,	
135	plays	in	Spotify	are	
needed
• To	equal	the	selling	of	an	
album,	a	song	needs	to	be	
palyed 47’680	times	on	
Spotify
• Since	2013	piracy	has	started	
to	decline
• Make	the	service	more	
appealing	for	right	holders
• Offer	better	compensation
• Offer	new	services	from	
which	the	artist	can	gain
Challenge Solution Result
Back	up	– What	do	artists	gain
68
Challenge Solution Result
Comparison	Between	Spotify	and	other	streaming	services
Spotify	profit	margin:	7%
Total	revenue	per	concert*:	1’014’260	€
Artist	revenue	after	ticket	costs:		943’261	€
Ticketing	expenses:	70’998	€
Average	competitors	profit	margin:	11,5	%
Total	revenue	per	concert*:	1’014’260	€
Artist	revenue	after	ticketing	costs:	897’620	€
Ticketing	expenses:	116’639	€
*	A	concert	with	13’000	tickets	sold	at	a	price	of	83	USD
Difference	in	expenses	=	45’695	€
Assuming	that	a	world	tour	has	70	stops	an	artist	could	save	up	to	3’194’919	€
6969
Back	Up	– Ticket	Implementation
Challenge Solution Result
Contracts
Software
Development
New	
Department
Instruction of
Existing
Employees
Start	Offering
the Service
• The	possibility	 of		the	
ticketing	service	is	added	
to	the	existing	contracts
• The	terms	will	include	
7%	profit	margin	and	the	
possibility	for	the	artist	
to	target	potential	
purchasers	
• The	task	of	
integrating	this	
feature	in	the	
already	existing	
softars is	given	to	
programmers	
already	working	
for	Spotify
• 20	people	are	hired	to	
support	the	relations	with	
the	artists	in	this	sense
• The	Department	will	be	in	
New	York
• Already	existing	
employees	–
especially	from	
the	client	support	
deparment are	
instructed	on	how	
to	solve	certain	
issues
Spotify	has	to	make	its	service	appealing	for	right	holders
70
Spotify payouts
are too low
Streaming platforms
are less profitable
that downloading
platforms for right
holders
Challenge Solution Result
Make the service
more appealing
for right holders
Spotify	can	implement	the	ticketing	without	incurring	high	costs
71
Challenge Solution Result
• Contracts	related	expenses
• Software	related	expenses
• Marketing	related	expenses
Expenses	of	the	ticketing	implementation Type of	cost Level
Adding	 ticket	possibility	in	pre-existing	contracts Low
Focus	the	development	 task	force on	the	software Low
Marketing through	 social	media	and	press	releases Low
Creation	of	ticketing departments	in	USA	and	Europe Medium	
-High
Main	expenses:	Creation	of	one	office	of	20	people	in	the	US
Total	cost	per	year	=	1’304’000
7272
Impact
Challenge Solution Result
2,8m	new	subscribers through	
Spotify	Ticketing
€181,44m	revenues
€1,225m	implementation	costs
€184,29m	net	revenue
€4,083m	(margin	575	concerts)
7373
Understanding	the	Ticketing	Revenues…
Challenge Solution Result
€1,225m €1,225m
+	70%	of	revenues
€1,225m €2,0825m
X €1,225m	+	0,7	*	X	
€4,083m
€1,225m	+	0,7	*
4,084m
Revenue Expenses
€4,083m €4,083m
SESSIONS
Backup	- Why	no	videos
75
Challenge Solution Result
• Huge	storing	costs	(livestreams	are	not	stored	after	– another	reason	why	you	have	to	be	premium)
• We	don‘t	want	videos	that	other	platforms	have
• VEVO	won‘t	allow	exclusive	videos	outside	of	their	platform
7676
Backup	- Impact
Challenge Solution Result
- Only	Axwell Λ	Ingrosso Livestream	from	Tomorrowland	 2015:	2‘000‘000	livestream	viewers
- With	2	other	big	festivals	per	year	+	a	range	of	exclusive	artist	sessions:
- 6’000’000	*	0.1	+	3’300’000		*	0.09	=	about 1,09m	new subscribers
Estimated	1,09m	new	subscribers	after	the	first	year, growing	together	with	number	 of	new	
exclusive	festivals	and	growth	of	festivals
Backup	- Spotify	Sessions	Costs
77
Challenge Solution Result
Hiring	new	salespeople:
• 1	US,	1	Europe around	92’000$	each	/	year
Livestream	partnerships:
• Two	big,	range	of	small	ones around	5	mio.	$	/	year
Total	cost	per	year	=	5’184’000	$	
->	However,	these	costs	are	shrinking	after	the	livestream software	is	finished,	 since	it	will	be	cheaper	to	make	exclusive	
partnerships	because	we	offer	way	more.
7878
Backup	- Implementation
Challenge Solution Result
Livestream	
software and
brand
awareness
Acquiring fast	
and big
partnerships
Broad
expansion
• First	integrating	festivals	and	
sessions	with	already	
existing	livestreams	to	keep	
costs	low	and	make	
livestream	partnerships
• Develop	own	livestream	
software	through	 developer	
squad	and	rise	as	music	
livestream	brand	through	
existing	partnerships
• Then	expanding	onto	
festivals	and	big	concerts	
without	any	livestreams
Backup	– Benefits	for	festivals
79
Challenge Solution Result
Better	quality	(example:	
Tomorrowland)
Added	audience	for	festivals
(big	number	of	Spotify	
premium	subscribers)
Audience	is	exactly	the	one	
that	wants	to	be	reached	by	
festivals
Already	paying	subscribers:	
chances	higher	that	they	
could	also	buy	a	ticket	for	
the	next	festival
Association	to	
brand	of	Spotify
8080
Backup	– Sessions	Pricing
Challenge Solution Result
• Sales	and	marketing	expenses
• Software	development
Expenses	of	Spotify	Sessions Type of	cost Level
Forming	a	developer	squad	for Spotify	 Sessions Low
Marketing through	 social	media	and	press	releases Low
Hiring	new	salespeople	to	negotiate	exclusive	
livestream deals	with	biggest	festivals	using	existing	
salespeople
Medium
-High
Main	expenses:		Hiring	new	labour	and	exclusive	livestream deals
Total	cost	per	year	=	5’184’000
8181
Impact
Challenge Solution Result
1,09m	new	subscribers	through	
Spotify	Sessions
€70,632m	revenues
€5,184m	costs for	Spotify	
Sessions
€65,448m	net	revenue
8282
Understanding	the	Sessions	Revenues…
Challenge Solution Result
€5,184m €5,184m
+	70%	of	revenues
€5,184m €8,8128m
X €5,184m	+	0,7	*	X	
€17,28m
€5,184m	+	0,7	*
17,28m
Revenue Expenses
€17,28m €17,28m
IMPACT
Bachup Calculation	on	Subscribers	required
84
Challenge Solution Result
541ml	€ in	order	to	achieve	break	even
358,4ml	€ from	price	discrimination
+	129ml	€ from	Spotify	ticketing
+	53,136ml	€ from	Spotify	streaming
=	541ml	€

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Hubspot Case Analysis
Hubspot Case AnalysisHubspot Case Analysis
Hubspot Case AnalysisYemi Adejumo
 
Culinarian Cookware case analysis
Culinarian Cookware case analysisCulinarian Cookware case analysis
Culinarian Cookware case analysisAnurag Bisen
 
ISB Case Competition | Final round
ISB Case Competition | Final roundISB Case Competition | Final round
ISB Case Competition | Final roundTarun Gupta
 
Classic knitwear and Guardian: A Perfect Fit?
Classic knitwear and Guardian: A Perfect Fit?Classic knitwear and Guardian: A Perfect Fit?
Classic knitwear and Guardian: A Perfect Fit?ArielJimenez36
 
Culinarian Cookware case study analysis
Culinarian Cookware case study analysisCulinarian Cookware case study analysis
Culinarian Cookware case study analysisSaurabh Mhase
 
TiVo Presentation
TiVo PresentationTiVo Presentation
TiVo Presentationmikerpitt
 
Altius golf and the fighter brand
Altius golf and the fighter brandAltius golf and the fighter brand
Altius golf and the fighter brandNowshad Amin
 
Hubspot Case Presentation - First Place
Hubspot Case Presentation - First PlaceHubspot Case Presentation - First Place
Hubspot Case Presentation - First PlaceConnor Dismer
 
Case Analysis - Making stickk stick
Case Analysis - Making stickk stickCase Analysis - Making stickk stick
Case Analysis - Making stickk stickDanh Đỗ
 
NATUREVIEW FARM CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW  FARM CASE STUDYNATUREVIEW  FARM CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW FARM CASE STUDYRaghav Thapar
 
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
 cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-cRohail Siddique
 
Arrow electronics case b2 b
Arrow electronics case b2 bArrow electronics case b2 b
Arrow electronics case b2 bAbhijeet Kumar
 
Chateau Margaux case study
Chateau Margaux case studyChateau Margaux case study
Chateau Margaux case studyMila Ioffe
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Hubspot Case Analysis
Hubspot Case AnalysisHubspot Case Analysis
Hubspot Case Analysis
 
Culinarian Cookware case analysis
Culinarian Cookware case analysisCulinarian Cookware case analysis
Culinarian Cookware case analysis
 
ISB Case Competition | Final round
ISB Case Competition | Final roundISB Case Competition | Final round
ISB Case Competition | Final round
 
Classic knitwear and Guardian: A Perfect Fit?
Classic knitwear and Guardian: A Perfect Fit?Classic knitwear and Guardian: A Perfect Fit?
Classic knitwear and Guardian: A Perfect Fit?
 
Culinarian Cookware case study analysis
Culinarian Cookware case study analysisCulinarian Cookware case study analysis
Culinarian Cookware case study analysis
 
Montreaux (1)
Montreaux (1)Montreaux (1)
Montreaux (1)
 
TiVo Presentation
TiVo PresentationTiVo Presentation
TiVo Presentation
 
Colgate vs P&G
Colgate vs P&GColgate vs P&G
Colgate vs P&G
 
Natureview farm
Natureview farmNatureview farm
Natureview farm
 
Altius golf and the fighter brand
Altius golf and the fighter brandAltius golf and the fighter brand
Altius golf and the fighter brand
 
The Fashion Channel
The Fashion ChannelThe Fashion Channel
The Fashion Channel
 
Hubspot Case Presentation - First Place
Hubspot Case Presentation - First PlaceHubspot Case Presentation - First Place
Hubspot Case Presentation - First Place
 
Case Analysis - Making stickk stick
Case Analysis - Making stickk stickCase Analysis - Making stickk stick
Case Analysis - Making stickk stick
 
NATUREVIEW FARM CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW  FARM CASE STUDYNATUREVIEW  FARM CASE STUDY
NATUREVIEW FARM CASE STUDY
 
Chase Sapphire Case Study
Chase Sapphire Case StudyChase Sapphire Case Study
Chase Sapphire Case Study
 
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
 cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
cola-wars-continue-coke-and-pepsi-in-2006-by-group-c
 
Arrow electronics case b2 b
Arrow electronics case b2 bArrow electronics case b2 b
Arrow electronics case b2 b
 
Chateau Margaux case study
Chateau Margaux case studyChateau Margaux case study
Chateau Margaux case study
 
P&G Case Study
P&G Case StudyP&G Case Study
P&G Case Study
 
Psi india
Psi indiaPsi india
Psi india
 

Andere mochten auch

Infrastructure And Application Consolidation Analysis And Design
Infrastructure And Application Consolidation Analysis And DesignInfrastructure And Application Consolidation Analysis And Design
Infrastructure And Application Consolidation Analysis And DesignAlan McSweeney
 
Marketing Strategy for Android App
Marketing Strategy for Android AppMarketing Strategy for Android App
Marketing Strategy for Android AppNitya Joshi
 
Build Your B2B Marketing Infrastructure
Build Your B2B Marketing InfrastructureBuild Your B2B Marketing Infrastructure
Build Your B2B Marketing InfrastructureLeft Brain DGA
 
The Best Mobile App Marketing of 2016
The Best Mobile App Marketing of 2016 The Best Mobile App Marketing of 2016
The Best Mobile App Marketing of 2016 Localytics
 
Infrastructure in 6 slides - The New Reality
Infrastructure in 6 slides - The New RealityInfrastructure in 6 slides - The New Reality
Infrastructure in 6 slides - The New RealityJulie Dodd
 
Marketing Plan for app : "GymOn"
Marketing Plan for app : "GymOn"Marketing Plan for app : "GymOn"
Marketing Plan for app : "GymOn"Anmol Agrawal
 
Introduction to Service Marketing in Infrastructure Services
Introduction to Service Marketing in Infrastructure Services Introduction to Service Marketing in Infrastructure Services
Introduction to Service Marketing in Infrastructure Services Azam FA
 
Infrastructure in india ,Indian Infrastructure
Infrastructure in india ,Indian InfrastructureInfrastructure in india ,Indian Infrastructure
Infrastructure in india ,Indian InfrastructureShubham Jain
 
8 steps for excellent B2B CX (customer experience)
8 steps for excellent B2B CX (customer experience)8 steps for excellent B2B CX (customer experience)
8 steps for excellent B2B CX (customer experience)B2B Marketing
 
Marketing strategies of coca cola company
Marketing strategies of coca cola companyMarketing strategies of coca cola company
Marketing strategies of coca cola companyTharushika Ruwangi
 
Business to business marketing ppt
Business to business marketing  pptBusiness to business marketing  ppt
Business to business marketing pptSukriti Mal
 
What Would Steve Do? 10 Lessons from the World's Most Captivating Presenters
What Would Steve Do? 10 Lessons from the World's Most Captivating PresentersWhat Would Steve Do? 10 Lessons from the World's Most Captivating Presenters
What Would Steve Do? 10 Lessons from the World's Most Captivating PresentersHubSpot
 

Andere mochten auch (18)

Infrastructure And Application Consolidation Analysis And Design
Infrastructure And Application Consolidation Analysis And DesignInfrastructure And Application Consolidation Analysis And Design
Infrastructure And Application Consolidation Analysis And Design
 
Marketing Strategy for Android App
Marketing Strategy for Android AppMarketing Strategy for Android App
Marketing Strategy for Android App
 
Build Your B2B Marketing Infrastructure
Build Your B2B Marketing InfrastructureBuild Your B2B Marketing Infrastructure
Build Your B2B Marketing Infrastructure
 
App marketing - ReseBok
App marketing - ReseBokApp marketing - ReseBok
App marketing - ReseBok
 
CRM Strategy and Implementation
CRM Strategy and ImplementationCRM Strategy and Implementation
CRM Strategy and Implementation
 
The Best Mobile App Marketing of 2016
The Best Mobile App Marketing of 2016 The Best Mobile App Marketing of 2016
The Best Mobile App Marketing of 2016
 
Infrastructure in 6 slides - The New Reality
Infrastructure in 6 slides - The New RealityInfrastructure in 6 slides - The New Reality
Infrastructure in 6 slides - The New Reality
 
Marketing Plan for app : "GymOn"
Marketing Plan for app : "GymOn"Marketing Plan for app : "GymOn"
Marketing Plan for app : "GymOn"
 
Introduction to Service Marketing in Infrastructure Services
Introduction to Service Marketing in Infrastructure Services Introduction to Service Marketing in Infrastructure Services
Introduction to Service Marketing in Infrastructure Services
 
MARKETING INFRASTRUCTURE
MARKETING INFRASTRUCTUREMARKETING INFRASTRUCTURE
MARKETING INFRASTRUCTURE
 
Infrastructure in india ,Indian Infrastructure
Infrastructure in india ,Indian InfrastructureInfrastructure in india ,Indian Infrastructure
Infrastructure in india ,Indian Infrastructure
 
It infrastructure
It infrastructureIt infrastructure
It infrastructure
 
B2B Marketing Strategy
B2B Marketing StrategyB2B Marketing Strategy
B2B Marketing Strategy
 
CRM Strategy
CRM StrategyCRM Strategy
CRM Strategy
 
8 steps for excellent B2B CX (customer experience)
8 steps for excellent B2B CX (customer experience)8 steps for excellent B2B CX (customer experience)
8 steps for excellent B2B CX (customer experience)
 
Marketing strategies of coca cola company
Marketing strategies of coca cola companyMarketing strategies of coca cola company
Marketing strategies of coca cola company
 
Business to business marketing ppt
Business to business marketing  pptBusiness to business marketing  ppt
Business to business marketing ppt
 
What Would Steve Do? 10 Lessons from the World's Most Captivating Presenters
What Would Steve Do? 10 Lessons from the World's Most Captivating PresentersWhat Would Steve Do? 10 Lessons from the World's Most Captivating Presenters
What Would Steve Do? 10 Lessons from the World's Most Captivating Presenters
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Send Files | Sendbig.comSend Files | Sendbig.com
Send Files | Sendbig.comSend Files | Sendbig.comSend Files | Sendbig.comSend Files | Sendbig.com
Send Files | Sendbig.comSend Files | Sendbig.comSendBig4
 
Pitch deck sample detail for New Business Proposal
Pitch deck sample detail for New Business ProposalPitch deck sample detail for New Business Proposal
Pitch deck sample detail for New Business ProposalEvelina300651
 
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessOrganizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessSeta Wicaksana
 
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...Operational Excellence Consulting
 
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfNewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfKhaled Al Awadi
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Dwarka mor Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Dwarka mor Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Dwarka mor Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Dwarka mor Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfDarshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfShashank Mehta
 
Horngren’s Financial & Managerial Accounting, 7th edition by Miller-Nobles so...
Horngren’s Financial & Managerial Accounting, 7th edition by Miller-Nobles so...Horngren’s Financial & Managerial Accounting, 7th edition by Miller-Nobles so...
Horngren’s Financial & Managerial Accounting, 7th edition by Miller-Nobles so...ssuserf63bd7
 
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptx
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptxFinancial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptx
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptxsaniyaimamuddin
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...ssuserf63bd7
 
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfAPRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfRbc Rbcua
 
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607dollysharma2066
 
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith PereraKenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Pereraictsugar
 
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDF
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDFGuide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDF
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDFChandresh Chudasama
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Anamaria Contreras
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptx
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptxAppkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptx
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptxappkodes
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Send Files | Sendbig.comSend Files | Sendbig.com
Send Files | Sendbig.comSend Files | Sendbig.comSend Files | Sendbig.comSend Files | Sendbig.com
Send Files | Sendbig.comSend Files | Sendbig.com
 
No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...
No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...
No-1 Call Girls In Goa 93193 VIP 73153 Escort service In North Goa Panaji, Ca...
 
Pitch deck sample detail for New Business Proposal
Pitch deck sample detail for New Business ProposalPitch deck sample detail for New Business Proposal
Pitch deck sample detail for New Business Proposal
 
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful BusinessOrganizational Structure Running A Successful Business
Organizational Structure Running A Successful Business
 
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...
 
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdfNewBase  19 April  2024  Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
NewBase 19 April 2024 Energy News issue - 1717 by Khaled Al Awadi.pdf
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Dwarka mor Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Dwarka mor Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Dwarka mor Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Dwarka mor Delhi NCR
 
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdfDarshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
Darshan Hiranandani [News About Next CEO].pdf
 
Horngren’s Financial & Managerial Accounting, 7th edition by Miller-Nobles so...
Horngren’s Financial & Managerial Accounting, 7th edition by Miller-Nobles so...Horngren’s Financial & Managerial Accounting, 7th edition by Miller-Nobles so...
Horngren’s Financial & Managerial Accounting, 7th edition by Miller-Nobles so...
 
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptx
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptxFinancial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptx
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptx
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
 
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
 
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfAPRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
 
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
 
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith PereraKenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
Kenya Coconut Production Presentation by Dr. Lalith Perera
 
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDF
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDFGuide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDF
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDF
 
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
 
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptx
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptxAppkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptx
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptx
 

Spotify Business Case