SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
The Population Trends That Are
       Reshaping Michigan


                    Reynolds Farley
              Population Studies Center
             Institute for Social Research
                University of Michigan
                   renf@umich.edu




   Observations prepared for a conference organized by:
GOVERNING and the American Association of Retired Persons
                    Lansing, Michigan
                      June 6, 2012
Michigan’s Slow Population Growth
        in Recent Decades

                Low Fertility

  Net loss of population in exchange with
                 other states

   Relatively few immigrants from abroad

  Michigan loses the economic stimulus of
             population growth

      Michigan loses political influence
FIGURE 1. Percent Change by Decade for Michigan’s Population and
            for the Nation’s Population, 1860 to 2010




60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
  1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

                             Michigan      Rest of the USA
FIGURE 2. Michigan’s Share of the Nation’s Total Population, 1850 to 2010




5%
                                                                               4.4%
                                                                     4.2% 4.3%      4.1%
                                                           3.9% 4.0%
4%                                                                                                   3.7%
                                                    3.5%                                                    3.5%
                        3.3% 3.2% 3.2%                                                                             3.3%
                   3.0%                3.1%
3%          2.8%


     2.0%
2%


1%


0%
         60



                       80

                              90




                                                   20

                                                          30

                                                                 40

                                                                        50

                                                                               60

                                                                                      70

                                                                                             80

                                                                                                    90

                                                                                                           00

                                                                                                                  10
  50




                70




                                     00

                                            10
       18



                     18

                            18




                                                 19

                                                        19

                                                               19

                                                                      19

                                                                             19

                                                                                    19

                                                                                           19

                                                                                                  19

                                                                                                         20

                                                                                                                20
18




              18




                                   19

                                          19
FIGURE 3. Number of Congressional Seats Apportioned to Michigan
          after Each Census, 1850 to 2010



                                 20                                                 19 19
 NUMBER OF CONGRESSIONAL SEATS



                                                                               18           18
                                 18                                    17 17
                                                                                                 16
                                 16                                                                   15
                                                                                                           14
                                 14                            13 13
                                                       12 12
                                 12               11
                                 10           9
                                  8
                                          6
                                  6
                                      4
                                  4
                                  2
                                  0
                                   50
                                   60


                                   80
                                   90


                                   10


                                   30
                                   40




                                   70


                                   90
                                   70




                                   00


                                   20




                                   50
                                   60


                                   80


                                   00
                                   10
                                 18




                                 18
                                 18




                                 19
                                 19




                                 19
                                 18
                                 18




                                 19
                                 19
                                 19




                                 19
                                 19


                                 19
                                 19
                                 20
                                 20
MAP 1. Percent Change in Population of Michigan Counties, 2000 to 2011
                            Keweenaw




                                             Keweenaw
                                      Houghton


                                Houghton
                                           Baraga
                    Ontonagon
                                                        Marquette                                Luce
               Gogebic                                              Alger                                       Chippewa
                                      Iron                                   Schoolcraft
                                                                                              Mackinac
                                                    Dickinson                                                                        Chippewa
                                                                    Delta


                                                        Menominee
                                                                                                            Emmet
                                                                                                                   Cheboygan
                                                                                                                           Presque Isle
                                                                                                        Charlevoix
                                                                                                                      Montmorency
                                                                                                        Antrim Otsego             Alpena
                                                                                       Leelanau
                                                                                   Benzie             Kalkaska Crawford Oscoda          Alcona
                                                                                            Grand Traverse
  Legend                                                                                                           Ogemaw Iosco
                                                                                 Manistee Wexford Missaukee
                                                                                                         Roscommon
      -2.6% and Below (Population Decline)                                                                            Arenac
                                                                               Mason Lake Osceola Clare Gladwin
                                                                                                                                                     Huron
      0% to -2.5% (Very Slow Loss)                                                                                             Bay
                                                                              Oceana               Mecosta Isabella Midland
                                                                                       Newaygo
      1% to 2.5% (Very Slow Growth)                                                                                                        Tuscola        Sanilac
                                                                                                    Montcalm                  Saginaw
                                                                               Muskegon                             Gratiot
      2.6% to 11.0% (Moderate Grow th)                                                                                                           Lapeer
                                                                                                 Kent                               Genesee                 St. Clair
                                                                                   Ottawa                   Ionia   ClintonShiawassee
      Over 11% (Grew Faster than the Nation)
                                                                                                                                           Oakland Macomb
                                                                                       Allegan      Barry       Eaton Ingham Livingston

                                                                                 Van Buren
                                                                                          Kalamazoo Calhoun            Jackson Washtenaw Wayne


                                                                            Berrien Cass St. Joseph Branch Hillsdale Lenawee Monroe
FIGURE 4. Population Change in Michigan Metropolitan Areas, 2000 to 2010


        Holland-Grand Haven                                                 10.7%
        Ann Arbor                                                   6.8%
        Grand Rapids                                         4.5%
        Monroe                                               4.2%
        Kalamazoo                                           3.7%
        Lansing                                             3.6%
        Jackson                               1.2%
        Battle Creek                        -1.3%
        Bay City                         -2.2%
        Flint                            -2.4%
        Niles-Benton Harbor           -3.5%
        Detroit                       -3.5%
        Saginaw                     -4.7%


        Non-metropolitan Michigan                    0.4%
        United States, Except Michigan                                     10.1%

                          -10%        -5%           0%      5%         10%          15%
TABLE 1. State Births Per 1,000 Women Ages 15 to 44 in 2010
         State                      Births per 1,000 Women

                    States with Highest Birth Rates
         Utah                                  92
         Alaska                                83
         Montana                               82
         Mississippi                           81
         Nevada                                80

                  Big Ten/Northwest Territory States
         Iowa                                 74
         Total United States                  72
         Illinois                             69
         Wisconsin                            67
         Minnesota                            67
         Ohio                                 66
         Indiana                              65
         Michigan                             67

                   States with the Lowest Birth Rates
         Massachusetts                          57
         West Virginia                          57
         Delaware                               56
         District of Columbia                   56
         Vermont                                51
TABLE 2. State Age-Adjusted Death Rates Per 100,000 in 2009
                                                 Deaths per
        State                                     100,000

                     States with Lowest Death Rates
        Hawaii                                        620
        Minnesota                                     652
        California                                    652
        Arizona                                       653
        New York                                      666

                 Big Ten/Northwest Territory States
        Wisconsin                                   709
        Iowa                                        725
        Total United States                         741
        Illinois                                    743
        Michigan                                    786
        Ohio                                        814
        Indiana                                     816

                  States with Highest Death Rates
        Louisiana                                     888
        Kentucky                                      898
        Alabama                                       920
        Mississippi                                   926
        West Virginia                                 902
FIGURE 5. Natural Increase (Births minus Deaths) and Net Internal Migration,
          Annual Estimates, 1980 to 2010


                                                                     100

                                               Natural Increase      75
                                               (Population Gain)     50

                                                                     25

                                                                     0




                                                                            THOUSANDS
                                                                     -25

                                                                     -50

                                 Net Internal Migration              -75
                                 (Population Loss)                   -100

                                                                     -125

                                                                     -150

                                                                     -175
1980


1983
1984
1985
1986


1989

1991
1992

1994
1995

1997
1998

2000

2002
2003


2006
2007
2008
2009
1981
1982




1987
1988

1990


1993


1996


2099

2001


2004
2005




  10
19
FIGURE 6. Median Age of the Population of “Oldest” States, Northwest Territory or
          Big Ten States, and “Youngest” States, Census 2010


                                                    OLDEST STATES
                        M aine                                                                    42.7
                      Vermont                                                                 41.5
                 West Virginia                                                                41.3
               New Hampshire                                                                 41.1
                       Florida                                                               40.7

                                       NORTHWEST TERRITORY OR BIG TEN STATES
                 Pennsylvania                                                               40.1
                     M ichigan                                                             38.9
                          Ohio                                                             38.8
                    Wisconsin                                                          38.5
                          Iowa                                                         38.1
                    Minnesota                                                         37.4
            Total United States                                                       37.2
                       Indiana                                                        37
                        Illinois                                                    36.6
                                                   YOUNGEST STATES
                         Idaho                                                  34.6
           District of Columbia                                                33.8
                        Alaska                                                 33.8
                         Texas                                                 33.6
                          Utah                                          29.2

                                   0      5   10    15     20   25      30     35      40          45
                                                         AGE IN YEARS
MAP 2. Percent Age 65 and Over in the Counties of Michigan and in
       Comparison to the Nation, Census 2010
                            Keweenaw




                                              Keweenaw
                                       Houghton


                                 Houghton
                     Ontonagon              Baraga

                                                         Marquette                                Luce
                Gogebic                                              Alger
                                                                                                                 Chippewa
                                       Iron                                   Schoolcraft      Mackinac
                                                     Dickinson                                                                          Chippewa
                                                                     Delta


                                                         Menominee
                                                                                                               Emmet
                                                                                                                      Cheboygan
                                                                                                                              Presque Isle
                                                                                                           Charlevoix
                                                                                                                         Montmorency
                                                                                                           Antrim Otsego             Alpena
   Legend                                                                               Leelanau

                                                                                    Benzie          Kalkaska Crawford Oscoda              Alcona
   Michigan_Counties                                                                      Grand Traverse

                                                                                  Manistee Wexford Missaukee        Ogemaw Iosco
   Age 65 and Over.AGE_65_PLU                                                                             Roscommon
                                                                                                                       Arenac
        Less than 12% (Younger)                                                 Mason Lake Osceola Clare Gladwin
                                                                                                                                                        Huron
                                                                                                                                  Bay
        13.9% to 12.1% (Close to National Average)                             Oceana               Mecosta Isabella Midland
                                                                                         Newaygo
                                                                                                                                              Tuscola       Sanilac
                                                                                                         Montcalm
        14.0% to 17.0% (Somewhat Older)                                         Muskegon                             Gratiot    Saginaw

                                                                                                                                                   Lapeer
        17.1% to 23.9% (Older)                                                      Ottawa
                                                                                                  Kent
                                                                                                             Ionia
                                                                                                                                     Genesee
                                                                                                                     ClintonShiawassee                        St. Clair

        Over 24% (Much Older)                                                                                                                 Oakland Macomb
                                                                                        Allegan      Barry       Eaton    Ingham Livingston

                                                                                  Van Buren
                                                                                              Kalamazoo Calhoun          Jackson Washtenaw Wayne


                                                                             Berrien Cass St. Joseph Branch Hillsdale Lenawee Monroe
MAP 3. Natural Decrease Counties in Michigan―Counties with More

          Deaths than Births, July 2010 to June 2011
                   Keweenaw




                                             Keweenaw
                                      Houghton


                                Houghton
                    Ontonagon              Baraga

                                                        Marquette                                Luce
               Gogebic                                              Alger
                                                                                                                Chippewa
                                      Iron                                   Schoolcraft      Mackinac
                                                    Dickinson                                                                        Chippewa
                                                                    Delta


                                                        Menominee
                                                                                                              Emmet
                                                                                                                     Cheboygan
                                                                                                                             Presque Isle
                                                                                                          Charlevoix
                                                                                                                        Montmorency
                                                                                                          Antrim Otsego             Alpena
                                                                                       Leelanau

                                                                                   Benzie             Kalkaska Crawford Oscoda          Alcona
                                                                                            Grand Traverse

                                                                                 Manistee Wexford Missaukee        Ogemaw Iosco
                                                                                                         Roscommon
                                                                                                                      Arenac
                                                                               Mason Lake Osceola Clare Gladwin
                                                                                                                                                     Huron
                                                                                                                               Bay
                                                                              Oceana               Mecosta Isabella Midland
                                                                                       Newaygo
                                                                                                                                           Tuscola        Sanilac
                                                                                                        Montcalm              Saginaw
                                                                               Muskegon                             Gratiot

Counties shown in red report more                                                  Ottawa
                                                                                                 Kent
                                                                                                            Ionia
                                                                                                                                    Genesee
                                                                                                                    ClintonShiawassee
                                                                                                                                                 Lapeer
                                                                                                                                                            St. Clair

deaths than births.                                                                                                                        Oakland Macomb
                                                                                       Allegan      Barry       Eaton Ingham Livingston

                                                                                 Van Buren
                                                                                             Kalamazoo Calhoun         Jackson Washtenaw Wayne


                                                                            Berrien Cass St. Joseph Branch Hillsdale Lenawee Monroe
FIGURE 7. Michigan’s Population by Age in 2009 and Projected Population in 2030
          (in Thousands)


            85+
                            Michigan, 2009                                           Michigan, 2030
           80-84      Total Population: 9,996,000                             Total Population: 10,692,000
           75-79        Median Age: 37.6 years                                  Median Age: 40.2 years

           70-74
           65-69
           60-64
           55-59
           50-54
           45-49
           40-44
           35-39
           30-34
           25-29
           20-24
           15-19
           10-14
             5-9
             0-4

              1,000    800      600      400        200     0     200   400      600      800     1,000

                                                     POPULATION (000)
FIGURE 7. Number of Jobs Each Month from January 2000 to March 2011
          in Michigan and the Rest of the United States (in thousands)

                           140,000
                                                          Total United States, Except Michigan
    NUMBER OF JOBS (000)


                           135,000

                           130,000

                           125,000

                           120,000

                           115,000

                           110,000
                                   2000    2001    2002     2003    2004    2005   2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011




                           4,800
                                                                           Michigan
    NUMBER OF JOBS (000)




                           4,600

                           4,400

                           4,200

                           4,000

                           3,800

                           3,600
                               2000       2001    2002     2003    2004    2005    2006   2007   2008   2009   2010   2011
FIGURE 8. Employment Change by Industry in Michigan and Rest of the United States,
          2000 to 2010, and Percent of Employment in Major Industrial Sectors, 2010
                   RETAIL TRADE
                                  18.7%    Michigan                                   -4.7%
                                           Rest of U.S.                                                       13.8%
                                  27.7%
                   DURABLE GOODS MANUFACTURING
                                  12.7%                   -37.1%
                                   6.5%                                -21.6%

                  MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
                                  11.9%    Michigan                                                              19.0%
                                  10.6%    Rest of U.S.                                                                    30.6%
                   PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES

                                  9.9%                                                -4.6%
                                  11.3%                                                                       14.8%

                   ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
                                  5.9%                                           -11.4%
                                  6.2%                                                                       11.7%

                   FINANCE, INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE
                                                                                                  0.0%
                                  5.7%
                                                                                                      5.6%
                                  6.4%
                   CONSTRUCTION
                               4.7%                           -30.5%
                               6.2%                                                       -0.7%

                   REPAIR AND PERSONAL SERVICES
                                  4.2%                                                                       11.8%
                                  4.7%                                                -4.7%
                   PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
                                  4.0%                                                    -0.2%
                                  5.2%                                                                          16.4%
                   POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION
                                  4.0%                                                                                  26.0%
                                  3.5%                                                                                     29.8%

                  NON-DURABLE MANUFACTURING
                               3.7%                            -29.3%
                               4.1%                                     -20.4%

                  TRANSPORTATION AND WAREHOUSING
                                  3.3%                                     -15.8%
                                  4.2%                                                    -0.1%

                  SOCIAL SERVICES
                                                                                                              13.6%
                                3.0%
                                3.0%                                                                                               38.0%

                  TOTAL EMPLOYMENT
                                  100%                                           -10.8%
                                  100%                                                                 7.7%

                                                           -40%            -20%               0%               20%            40%
FIGURE 9. Economic Status of Persons Living in Michigan and Elsewhere in the
          United States: Per Capita Income for Residents 21 and Over, Median
          Household Income and Poverty Rate, 1950 to 2008

                                        MICHIGAN                               ELSEWHERE IN UNITED STATES

                     1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2008                     1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2008
                                    1980                                                   1980
           100%


            80%


            60%


            40%


            20%


             0%
                    $15,358          $32,338       $34,574       $35,084    $13,982          $28,851       $34,750       $38,370
PER CAPITA INCOME
                              $23,273       $33,555       $40,333                     $21,186       $30,846       $39,099



        COMFORTABLE                         MIDDLE CLASS                   NEAR POOR                          IMPOVERISHED
        (Incomes 500% or more               (Incomes 300% to 499%          (Incomes 100% to 199%              (Incomes below
        of the poverty line)                of the poverty line)           of the poverty line)               the poverty line)
FIGURE 10. Job Growth Rates for States from January 2011 to April 2012
           (Bureau of Labor Statistics Monthly Survey of Employers)
                                           STATES WITH HIGHEST RATES OF
                                                 NEW JOB GROWTH
                          Utah                                                   3.2%

                   Oklahoma                                                  3.0%

                   Louisiana                                                 3.0%
                        Texas                                               2.9%
               North Dakota             0.1%

                                          NORTHWEST TERRITORY OR TRADITIONAL
                                                   BIG TEN STATES

                     Indiana                                         2.2%

                    Michigan                                  1.8%

                  Minnesota                             1.5%

                          Ohio                         1.4%
                          Iowa                         1.4%
           Total United State                          1.4%
                        Illinois                0.8%


                                            STATES WITH NO NET JOB GROWTH OR
                                                      A LOSS OF JOBS
                 Mississippi            0.0%
                        Maine           0.0%

               Rhode Island         -0.2%
             New Hampshite          -0.2%
                  Wisconsin         -0.4%

                  -1%      -1%     0%      1%    1%    2%      2%      3%   3%      4%
FIGURE 8. Index of Labor Productivity in Manufacturing for the Nation, 1990 to 2011:
        Number of Workers Needed in Years Past to Achieve Output of 100
        Workers in 2011


                       240


                       220
   NUMBER OF WORKERS




                       200


                       180


                       160


                       140


                       120


                       100
                                              94
                                                   95




                                                            98




                                                            03




                                                            06
                                                            07
                         90
                              91




                                                            99




                                                            02




                                                            11
                                   92




                                                            00




                                                            04




                                                            09
                                         3




                                                        96
                                                            97




                                                            01




                                                            05




                                                            08


                                                            10
                                          9
                                  19


                                          19
                                               19




                                                         19


                                                         20




                                                         20
                                                         20


                                                         20
                                                         20


                                                         20
                       19
                             19




                                                    19
                                                         19


                                                         19


                                                         20
                                                         20




                                                         20




                                                         20




                                                         20
                                       19




                                                         20
FIGURE 9. Population of Michigan Age 65 and Over, 1990 to 2030

           2,200



           2,000



           1,800
MILLIONS




           1,600



           1,400



           1,200



           1,000
                  94




                  00




                  06




                  12




                  18




                  24



                  28

                  30
                  96




                  02

                  04




                  10
                   0
                  92




                  98




                  08




                  14

                  16



                  20

                  22



                  26
               9
               19




               19




               20

               20



               20

               20




               20




               20

               20

               20
               19




               20




               20




               20




               20
            19




               19




               20




               20




               20




               20
FIGURE 10. Percent Change in Employment in Michigan Metropolitan Areas, the
         Remainder of Michigan, and the Rest of the United States, 2000 to 2010


                    Ann Arbor                                                             1.9%

               Benton Harbor                          -11.9%

                        Detroit                         -10.6%

                          Flint      -23.8%

      Grand Rapids-Muskegon                                                  -1.8%

                      Jackson                                    -7.9%

      Kalamazoo-Battle Creek                                     -7.9%

         Lansing-East Lansing                                       -6.3%

     Saginaw-Bay City-Midland                          -11.0%




        Remainder of Michigan                                     -7.2%

        Total State of Michigan                         -10.8%

    Remainder of United States                                                                    9.1%

                              -30%     -25%   -20%   -15%        -10%       -5%      0%      5%   10%
FIGURE 11. Per Capita Income, 2000 to 2010, for Persons Aged 21 and Percent Change

           in Constant Dollar Per Capita Income, 2000 to 2010, for Most Prosperous
           States, Big Ten States, and Least Prosperous States
                                                     Percent Change
                                                     MOST PROSPEROUS STATES                                in Decade

                District of Columbia                                                             $55,973     4.7%

                       Connecticut                                                     $51,205               -8.9%

                        New Jersey                                             $48,163                       -6.4%

                          Maryland                                            $47,483                        -2.3%

                    Massachusetts                                            $46,393                         -4.6%


                                         NORTHWEST TERRITORY OR "BIG TEN" STATES

                         Minnesota                                 $39,490                                  -7.5%
                             Illinois                          $37,829                                     -11.3%

                      Pennsylvania                        $35,283                                           -5.9%
                         Wisconsin                       $34,852                                           -11.0%
                               Iowa                     $33,882                                             -5.6%
                               Ohio                  $32,821                                               -14.4%
                          Michigan                   $32,509                                               -20.6%
                            Indiana                 $31,882                                                -15.6%



                                                      LEAST PROSPEROUS STATES
                              Idaho            $30,161                                                     -12.4%

                          Kentucky            $29,426                                                      -10.0%

                          Arkansas          $28,474                                                        --8.3%

                      West Virginia        $27,569                                                         -5.3%
                        Mississippi       $26,842                                                          -10.8%


                Total United States                        $35,832                                         -15.6%

                                   $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000 $55,000 $60,000

More Related Content

Similar to The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

Situs - O\'Connor Land Forecast (Oct 2008)
Situs - O\'Connor Land Forecast (Oct 2008)Situs - O\'Connor Land Forecast (Oct 2008)
Situs - O\'Connor Land Forecast (Oct 2008)Maury Bronstein
 
22.02, Group 5 — Concept of sustainable development in built environment
22.02, Group 5 — Concept of sustainable development in built environment22.02, Group 5 — Concept of sustainable development in built environment
22.02, Group 5 — Concept of sustainable development in built environmentWDC_Ukraine
 
Men vs Women trends in earnings and education
Men vs Women trends in earnings and educationMen vs Women trends in earnings and education
Men vs Women trends in earnings and educationGaetan Lion
 
Nigeria’S Economic Competitiveness In The African Context
Nigeria’S Economic Competitiveness In The African ContextNigeria’S Economic Competitiveness In The African Context
Nigeria’S Economic Competitiveness In The African Contexticgfmconference
 
ACFTA Trickle Down Effect: ICT Education Roles on Human Resources Readiness...
ACFTA Trickle Down Effect:  ICT Education Roles on Human Resources  Readiness...ACFTA Trickle Down Effect:  ICT Education Roles on Human Resources  Readiness...
ACFTA Trickle Down Effect: ICT Education Roles on Human Resources Readiness...Djadja Sardjana
 
Ponca City Economy Presentation - 3.15.12
Ponca City Economy Presentation - 3.15.12Ponca City Economy Presentation - 3.15.12
Ponca City Economy Presentation - 3.15.12KatLong68
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...Cook County Commissioner Bridget Gainer
 
Roadmap For International Growth Final
Roadmap For International Growth FinalRoadmap For International Growth Final
Roadmap For International Growth Finaljwdento3
 
Questionnaires and results
Questionnaires and resultsQuestionnaires and results
Questionnaires and resultschantellesynnott
 
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health CareWellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health CareSmeaco
 
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health CareWellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health Careguest00dbec2
 
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health CareWellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health Careguest00dbec2
 
The transition to Finch - the implications for academic libraries
The transition to Finch - the implications for academic librariesThe transition to Finch - the implications for academic libraries
The transition to Finch - the implications for academic librariesBLHdSocSci
 
Advice Charities and The Credit Crunch
Advice Charities and The Credit CrunchAdvice Charities and The Credit Crunch
Advice Charities and The Credit CrunchnfpSynergy
 

Similar to The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan (20)

Situs - O\'Connor Land Forecast (Oct 2008)
Situs - O\'Connor Land Forecast (Oct 2008)Situs - O\'Connor Land Forecast (Oct 2008)
Situs - O\'Connor Land Forecast (Oct 2008)
 
22.02, Group 5 — Concept of sustainable development in built environment
22.02, Group 5 — Concept of sustainable development in built environment22.02, Group 5 — Concept of sustainable development in built environment
22.02, Group 5 — Concept of sustainable development in built environment
 
Men vs Women trends in earnings and education
Men vs Women trends in earnings and educationMen vs Women trends in earnings and education
Men vs Women trends in earnings and education
 
NAMM Presentation 2008
NAMM Presentation 2008NAMM Presentation 2008
NAMM Presentation 2008
 
Nigeria’S Economic Competitiveness In The African Context
Nigeria’S Economic Competitiveness In The African ContextNigeria’S Economic Competitiveness In The African Context
Nigeria’S Economic Competitiveness In The African Context
 
ACFTA Trickle Down Effect: ICT Education Roles on Human Resources Readiness...
ACFTA Trickle Down Effect:  ICT Education Roles on Human Resources  Readiness...ACFTA Trickle Down Effect:  ICT Education Roles on Human Resources  Readiness...
ACFTA Trickle Down Effect: ICT Education Roles on Human Resources Readiness...
 
Ponca City Economy Presentation - 3.15.12
Ponca City Economy Presentation - 3.15.12Ponca City Economy Presentation - 3.15.12
Ponca City Economy Presentation - 3.15.12
 
Prt ir update may 2012
Prt ir update may 2012Prt ir update may 2012
Prt ir update may 2012
 
Financing For Development
Financing For DevelopmentFinancing For Development
Financing For Development
 
The Green Delusion
The Green DelusionThe Green Delusion
The Green Delusion
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...
 
Roadmap For International Growth Final
Roadmap For International Growth FinalRoadmap For International Growth Final
Roadmap For International Growth Final
 
Macroeconomic Management in Pakistan
Macroeconomic Management in PakistanMacroeconomic Management in Pakistan
Macroeconomic Management in Pakistan
 
Questionnaires and results
Questionnaires and resultsQuestionnaires and results
Questionnaires and results
 
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health CareWellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
 
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health CareWellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
 
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health CareWellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
Wellness & Consumer Driven Health Care
 
The transition to Finch - the implications for academic libraries
The transition to Finch - the implications for academic librariesThe transition to Finch - the implications for academic libraries
The transition to Finch - the implications for academic libraries
 
China and India
China and India China and India
China and India
 
Advice Charities and The Credit Crunch
Advice Charities and The Credit CrunchAdvice Charities and The Credit Crunch
Advice Charities and The Credit Crunch
 

More from University of Michigan, Government Relations

More from University of Michigan, Government Relations (20)

Mrs 2017 Orientation
Mrs 2017 OrientationMrs 2017 Orientation
Mrs 2017 Orientation
 
Using 3-D Printing to Save Lives at University of Michigan
Using 3-D Printing to Save Lives at University of MichiganUsing 3-D Printing to Save Lives at University of Michigan
Using 3-D Printing to Save Lives at University of Michigan
 
What Kind of Presidential Election is This?
What Kind of Presidential Election is This?What Kind of Presidential Election is This?
What Kind of Presidential Election is This?
 
Sustainable Energy Futures for Michigan
Sustainable Energy Futures for MichiganSustainable Energy Futures for Michigan
Sustainable Energy Futures for Michigan
 
Preserving Our Great Lakes: How Do we Adapt As they Change?
Preserving Our Great Lakes: How Do we Adapt As they Change?Preserving Our Great Lakes: How Do we Adapt As they Change?
Preserving Our Great Lakes: How Do we Adapt As they Change?
 
U-M School of Information program overview
U-M School of Information program overviewU-M School of Information program overview
U-M School of Information program overview
 
Maker weekend-10-12-2014
Maker weekend-10-12-2014Maker weekend-10-12-2014
Maker weekend-10-12-2014
 
Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan: Integrated Assessment
Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan: Integrated AssessmentHydraulic Fracturing in Michigan: Integrated Assessment
Hydraulic Fracturing in Michigan: Integrated Assessment
 
Michigan Road Scholars Tour 2014orientation
Michigan Road Scholars Tour 2014orientationMichigan Road Scholars Tour 2014orientation
Michigan Road Scholars Tour 2014orientation
 
Camp KinoMaage 2013
Camp KinoMaage 2013Camp KinoMaage 2013
Camp KinoMaage 2013
 
Camp kino maage 2013 article
Camp kino maage 2013 articleCamp kino maage 2013 article
Camp kino maage 2013 article
 
How We Fund Local Government: Michigan's Local Leaders See Need for Reform
How We Fund Local Government: Michigan's Local Leaders See Need for ReformHow We Fund Local Government: Michigan's Local Leaders See Need for Reform
How We Fund Local Government: Michigan's Local Leaders See Need for Reform
 
Moocs and More
Moocs and MoreMoocs and More
Moocs and More
 
Camp Kinomaage
Camp KinomaageCamp Kinomaage
Camp Kinomaage
 
Design Futures for Industrial Saginaw
Design Futures for Industrial SaginawDesign Futures for Industrial Saginaw
Design Futures for Industrial Saginaw
 
April 2012 Wolverine Caucus Event Featuring Paul N. Courant
April 2012 Wolverine Caucus Event Featuring Paul N. CourantApril 2012 Wolverine Caucus Event Featuring Paul N. Courant
April 2012 Wolverine Caucus Event Featuring Paul N. Courant
 
2012 Michigan Road Scholar Orientation
2012 Michigan Road Scholar Orientation2012 Michigan Road Scholar Orientation
2012 Michigan Road Scholar Orientation
 
Wolverine Caucus featuring Ken Fischer, 3 16-11
Wolverine Caucus featuring Ken Fischer, 3 16-11Wolverine Caucus featuring Ken Fischer, 3 16-11
Wolverine Caucus featuring Ken Fischer, 3 16-11
 
2011 Michigan Road Scholar Tour
 2011 Michigan Road Scholar Tour 2011 Michigan Road Scholar Tour
2011 Michigan Road Scholar Tour
 
Presentation to UM Regents regarding University / Community Engagements
Presentation to UM Regents regarding University / Community Engagements Presentation to UM Regents regarding University / Community Engagements
Presentation to UM Regents regarding University / Community Engagements
 

Recently uploaded

Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptxJudging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptxSherlyMaeNeri
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)lakshayb543
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYKayeClaireEstoconing
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4MiaBumagat1
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Celine George
 
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17Celine George
 
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTS
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTSGRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTS
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTSJoshuaGantuangco2
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptxmary850239
 
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptxKarra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptxAshokKarra1
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxAnupkumar Sharma
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...Postal Advocate Inc.
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemChristalin Nelson
 
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfVirtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfErwinPantujan2
 
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxScience 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxMaryGraceBautista27
 
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Seán Kennedy
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptxiammrhaywood
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptxJudging the Relevance  and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
Judging the Relevance and worth of ideas part 2.pptx
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
 
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptxRaw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
 
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
 
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTS
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTSGRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTS
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTS
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
 
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptxKarra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
 
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxYOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management System
 
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfVirtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
 
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxScience 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
 
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
 

The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

  • 1. The Population Trends That Are Reshaping Michigan Reynolds Farley Population Studies Center Institute for Social Research University of Michigan renf@umich.edu Observations prepared for a conference organized by: GOVERNING and the American Association of Retired Persons Lansing, Michigan June 6, 2012
  • 2. Michigan’s Slow Population Growth in Recent Decades Low Fertility  Net loss of population in exchange with other states  Relatively few immigrants from abroad  Michigan loses the economic stimulus of population growth  Michigan loses political influence
  • 3. FIGURE 1. Percent Change by Decade for Michigan’s Population and for the Nation’s Population, 1860 to 2010 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Michigan Rest of the USA
  • 4. FIGURE 2. Michigan’s Share of the Nation’s Total Population, 1850 to 2010 5% 4.4% 4.2% 4.3% 4.1% 3.9% 4.0% 4% 3.7% 3.5% 3.5% 3.3% 3.2% 3.2% 3.3% 3.0% 3.1% 3% 2.8% 2.0% 2% 1% 0% 60 80 90 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 50 70 00 10 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 18 18 19 19
  • 5. FIGURE 3. Number of Congressional Seats Apportioned to Michigan after Each Census, 1850 to 2010 20 19 19 NUMBER OF CONGRESSIONAL SEATS 18 18 18 17 17 16 16 15 14 14 13 13 12 12 12 11 10 9 8 6 6 4 4 2 0 50 60 80 90 10 30 40 70 90 70 00 20 50 60 80 00 10 18 18 18 19 19 19 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20
  • 6. MAP 1. Percent Change in Population of Michigan Counties, 2000 to 2011 Keweenaw Keweenaw Houghton Houghton Baraga Ontonagon Marquette Luce Gogebic Alger Chippewa Iron Schoolcraft Mackinac Dickinson Chippewa Delta Menominee Emmet Cheboygan Presque Isle Charlevoix Montmorency Antrim Otsego Alpena Leelanau Benzie Kalkaska Crawford Oscoda Alcona Grand Traverse Legend Ogemaw Iosco Manistee Wexford Missaukee Roscommon -2.6% and Below (Population Decline) Arenac Mason Lake Osceola Clare Gladwin Huron 0% to -2.5% (Very Slow Loss) Bay Oceana Mecosta Isabella Midland Newaygo 1% to 2.5% (Very Slow Growth) Tuscola Sanilac Montcalm Saginaw Muskegon Gratiot 2.6% to 11.0% (Moderate Grow th) Lapeer Kent Genesee St. Clair Ottawa Ionia ClintonShiawassee Over 11% (Grew Faster than the Nation) Oakland Macomb Allegan Barry Eaton Ingham Livingston Van Buren Kalamazoo Calhoun Jackson Washtenaw Wayne Berrien Cass St. Joseph Branch Hillsdale Lenawee Monroe
  • 7. FIGURE 4. Population Change in Michigan Metropolitan Areas, 2000 to 2010 Holland-Grand Haven 10.7% Ann Arbor 6.8% Grand Rapids 4.5% Monroe 4.2% Kalamazoo 3.7% Lansing 3.6% Jackson 1.2% Battle Creek -1.3% Bay City -2.2% Flint -2.4% Niles-Benton Harbor -3.5% Detroit -3.5% Saginaw -4.7% Non-metropolitan Michigan 0.4% United States, Except Michigan 10.1% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%
  • 8. TABLE 1. State Births Per 1,000 Women Ages 15 to 44 in 2010 State Births per 1,000 Women States with Highest Birth Rates Utah 92 Alaska 83 Montana 82 Mississippi 81 Nevada 80 Big Ten/Northwest Territory States Iowa 74 Total United States 72 Illinois 69 Wisconsin 67 Minnesota 67 Ohio 66 Indiana 65 Michigan 67 States with the Lowest Birth Rates Massachusetts 57 West Virginia 57 Delaware 56 District of Columbia 56 Vermont 51
  • 9. TABLE 2. State Age-Adjusted Death Rates Per 100,000 in 2009 Deaths per State 100,000 States with Lowest Death Rates Hawaii 620 Minnesota 652 California 652 Arizona 653 New York 666 Big Ten/Northwest Territory States Wisconsin 709 Iowa 725 Total United States 741 Illinois 743 Michigan 786 Ohio 814 Indiana 816 States with Highest Death Rates Louisiana 888 Kentucky 898 Alabama 920 Mississippi 926 West Virginia 902
  • 10. FIGURE 5. Natural Increase (Births minus Deaths) and Net Internal Migration, Annual Estimates, 1980 to 2010 100 Natural Increase 75 (Population Gain) 50 25 0 THOUSANDS -25 -50 Net Internal Migration -75 (Population Loss) -100 -125 -150 -175 1980 1983 1984 1985 1986 1989 1991 1992 1994 1995 1997 1998 2000 2002 2003 2006 2007 2008 2009 1981 1982 1987 1988 1990 1993 1996 2099 2001 2004 2005 10 19
  • 11. FIGURE 6. Median Age of the Population of “Oldest” States, Northwest Territory or Big Ten States, and “Youngest” States, Census 2010 OLDEST STATES M aine 42.7 Vermont 41.5 West Virginia 41.3 New Hampshire 41.1 Florida 40.7 NORTHWEST TERRITORY OR BIG TEN STATES Pennsylvania 40.1 M ichigan 38.9 Ohio 38.8 Wisconsin 38.5 Iowa 38.1 Minnesota 37.4 Total United States 37.2 Indiana 37 Illinois 36.6 YOUNGEST STATES Idaho 34.6 District of Columbia 33.8 Alaska 33.8 Texas 33.6 Utah 29.2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 AGE IN YEARS
  • 12. MAP 2. Percent Age 65 and Over in the Counties of Michigan and in Comparison to the Nation, Census 2010 Keweenaw Keweenaw Houghton Houghton Ontonagon Baraga Marquette Luce Gogebic Alger Chippewa Iron Schoolcraft Mackinac Dickinson Chippewa Delta Menominee Emmet Cheboygan Presque Isle Charlevoix Montmorency Antrim Otsego Alpena Legend Leelanau Benzie Kalkaska Crawford Oscoda Alcona Michigan_Counties Grand Traverse Manistee Wexford Missaukee Ogemaw Iosco Age 65 and Over.AGE_65_PLU Roscommon Arenac Less than 12% (Younger) Mason Lake Osceola Clare Gladwin Huron Bay 13.9% to 12.1% (Close to National Average) Oceana Mecosta Isabella Midland Newaygo Tuscola Sanilac Montcalm 14.0% to 17.0% (Somewhat Older) Muskegon Gratiot Saginaw Lapeer 17.1% to 23.9% (Older) Ottawa Kent Ionia Genesee ClintonShiawassee St. Clair Over 24% (Much Older) Oakland Macomb Allegan Barry Eaton Ingham Livingston Van Buren Kalamazoo Calhoun Jackson Washtenaw Wayne Berrien Cass St. Joseph Branch Hillsdale Lenawee Monroe
  • 13. MAP 3. Natural Decrease Counties in Michigan―Counties with More Deaths than Births, July 2010 to June 2011 Keweenaw Keweenaw Houghton Houghton Ontonagon Baraga Marquette Luce Gogebic Alger Chippewa Iron Schoolcraft Mackinac Dickinson Chippewa Delta Menominee Emmet Cheboygan Presque Isle Charlevoix Montmorency Antrim Otsego Alpena Leelanau Benzie Kalkaska Crawford Oscoda Alcona Grand Traverse Manistee Wexford Missaukee Ogemaw Iosco Roscommon Arenac Mason Lake Osceola Clare Gladwin Huron Bay Oceana Mecosta Isabella Midland Newaygo Tuscola Sanilac Montcalm Saginaw Muskegon Gratiot Counties shown in red report more Ottawa Kent Ionia Genesee ClintonShiawassee Lapeer St. Clair deaths than births. Oakland Macomb Allegan Barry Eaton Ingham Livingston Van Buren Kalamazoo Calhoun Jackson Washtenaw Wayne Berrien Cass St. Joseph Branch Hillsdale Lenawee Monroe
  • 14. FIGURE 7. Michigan’s Population by Age in 2009 and Projected Population in 2030 (in Thousands) 85+ Michigan, 2009 Michigan, 2030 80-84 Total Population: 9,996,000 Total Population: 10,692,000 75-79 Median Age: 37.6 years Median Age: 40.2 years 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 POPULATION (000)
  • 15. FIGURE 7. Number of Jobs Each Month from January 2000 to March 2011 in Michigan and the Rest of the United States (in thousands) 140,000 Total United States, Except Michigan NUMBER OF JOBS (000) 135,000 130,000 125,000 120,000 115,000 110,000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 4,800 Michigan NUMBER OF JOBS (000) 4,600 4,400 4,200 4,000 3,800 3,600 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
  • 16. FIGURE 8. Employment Change by Industry in Michigan and Rest of the United States, 2000 to 2010, and Percent of Employment in Major Industrial Sectors, 2010 RETAIL TRADE 18.7% Michigan -4.7% Rest of U.S. 13.8% 27.7% DURABLE GOODS MANUFACTURING 12.7% -37.1% 6.5% -21.6% MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES 11.9% Michigan 19.0% 10.6% Rest of U.S. 30.6% PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES 9.9% -4.6% 11.3% 14.8% ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION 5.9% -11.4% 6.2% 11.7% FINANCE, INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE 0.0% 5.7% 5.6% 6.4% CONSTRUCTION 4.7% -30.5% 6.2% -0.7% REPAIR AND PERSONAL SERVICES 4.2% 11.8% 4.7% -4.7% PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 4.0% -0.2% 5.2% 16.4% POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION 4.0% 26.0% 3.5% 29.8% NON-DURABLE MANUFACTURING 3.7% -29.3% 4.1% -20.4% TRANSPORTATION AND WAREHOUSING 3.3% -15.8% 4.2% -0.1% SOCIAL SERVICES 13.6% 3.0% 3.0% 38.0% TOTAL EMPLOYMENT 100% -10.8% 100% 7.7% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40%
  • 17. FIGURE 9. Economic Status of Persons Living in Michigan and Elsewhere in the United States: Per Capita Income for Residents 21 and Over, Median Household Income and Poverty Rate, 1950 to 2008 MICHIGAN ELSEWHERE IN UNITED STATES 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2008 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2008 1980 1980 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% $15,358 $32,338 $34,574 $35,084 $13,982 $28,851 $34,750 $38,370 PER CAPITA INCOME $23,273 $33,555 $40,333 $21,186 $30,846 $39,099 COMFORTABLE MIDDLE CLASS NEAR POOR IMPOVERISHED (Incomes 500% or more (Incomes 300% to 499% (Incomes 100% to 199% (Incomes below of the poverty line) of the poverty line) of the poverty line) the poverty line)
  • 18. FIGURE 10. Job Growth Rates for States from January 2011 to April 2012 (Bureau of Labor Statistics Monthly Survey of Employers) STATES WITH HIGHEST RATES OF NEW JOB GROWTH Utah 3.2% Oklahoma 3.0% Louisiana 3.0% Texas 2.9% North Dakota 0.1% NORTHWEST TERRITORY OR TRADITIONAL BIG TEN STATES Indiana 2.2% Michigan 1.8% Minnesota 1.5% Ohio 1.4% Iowa 1.4% Total United State 1.4% Illinois 0.8% STATES WITH NO NET JOB GROWTH OR A LOSS OF JOBS Mississippi 0.0% Maine 0.0% Rhode Island -0.2% New Hampshite -0.2% Wisconsin -0.4% -1% -1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4%
  • 19. FIGURE 8. Index of Labor Productivity in Manufacturing for the Nation, 1990 to 2011: Number of Workers Needed in Years Past to Achieve Output of 100 Workers in 2011 240 220 NUMBER OF WORKERS 200 180 160 140 120 100 94 95 98 03 06 07 90 91 99 02 11 92 00 04 09 3 96 97 01 05 08 10 9 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 19 20
  • 20. FIGURE 9. Population of Michigan Age 65 and Over, 1990 to 2030 2,200 2,000 1,800 MILLIONS 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 94 00 06 12 18 24 28 30 96 02 04 10 0 92 98 08 14 16 20 22 26 9 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 20 20 20 20 19 19 20 20 20 20
  • 21. FIGURE 10. Percent Change in Employment in Michigan Metropolitan Areas, the Remainder of Michigan, and the Rest of the United States, 2000 to 2010 Ann Arbor 1.9% Benton Harbor -11.9% Detroit -10.6% Flint -23.8% Grand Rapids-Muskegon -1.8% Jackson -7.9% Kalamazoo-Battle Creek -7.9% Lansing-East Lansing -6.3% Saginaw-Bay City-Midland -11.0% Remainder of Michigan -7.2% Total State of Michigan -10.8% Remainder of United States 9.1% -30% -25% -20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10%
  • 22. FIGURE 11. Per Capita Income, 2000 to 2010, for Persons Aged 21 and Percent Change in Constant Dollar Per Capita Income, 2000 to 2010, for Most Prosperous States, Big Ten States, and Least Prosperous States Percent Change MOST PROSPEROUS STATES in Decade District of Columbia $55,973 4.7% Connecticut $51,205 -8.9% New Jersey $48,163 -6.4% Maryland $47,483 -2.3% Massachusetts $46,393 -4.6% NORTHWEST TERRITORY OR "BIG TEN" STATES Minnesota $39,490 -7.5% Illinois $37,829 -11.3% Pennsylvania $35,283 -5.9% Wisconsin $34,852 -11.0% Iowa $33,882 -5.6% Ohio $32,821 -14.4% Michigan $32,509 -20.6% Indiana $31,882 -15.6% LEAST PROSPEROUS STATES Idaho $30,161 -12.4% Kentucky $29,426 -10.0% Arkansas $28,474 --8.3% West Virginia $27,569 -5.3% Mississippi $26,842 -10.8% Total United States $35,832 -15.6% $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000 $55,000 $60,000