1. Class Summary
Run By: Carrie Williams (cwilliams@nhsocal.com) MTM Tool: Class Summary
Date Run: Dec 19 2015 From Saved Query: No
Date: Dec 18 2015 Instructor(s): Williams Course: Excel 2013 ­ Part 2
Learning Provider: New Horizons ­ Southern California Location: New Horizons ­ Tucson ­ (Learning Partner) Client: Public Class
Summary
Student Instructor Courseware Business Results Additional Questions
Learning
Effectiveness Environment
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 9.00 5.57 2.00 1.00 2.00 8.50
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 9.00 8.71 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.50
aschoenherr@tep.com 9.00 9.00 7.00 9.00 7.00 5.50
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
dawn.shann@usecology.com 9.00 6.17 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.00
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
TSmith@pcl.com 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.50
Average 8.87 8.09 7.38 7.50 7.38 7.75
Summary (cont)
Student Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 6.24
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 8.53
aschoenherr@tep.com 8.35
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00
dawn.shann@usecology.com 7.07
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 9.00
TSmith@pcl.com 7.94
Average 8.16
Instructor
Student
The instructor was
knowledgeable about the
subject.
Participants were
encouraged to take part
in class discussions. Instructor overall
The instructor''s
presentation skills were
adequate.
The instructor provided real­world
experiences and examples. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
aschoenherr@tep.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
dawn.shann@usecology.com 9.00 ­ 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
TSmith@pcl.com 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
Average 8.88 8.86 8.88 8.88 8.88 8.87
Courseware
Clarity of the training Technical depth of the The material was
Effectiveness of the labs
in reinforcing the
knowledge/skills learned
Relevance of the
labs to real world
Time dedicated to activities
such as discussions,
practices, and labs (as
- 1 / 8 -

2.
Student content training content organized logically. in the modules job situations opposed to lecture)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 8.00 1.00 8.00 2.00 4.00 8.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 9.00 9.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 9.00
aschoenherr@tep.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
dawn.shann@usecology.com 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 ­
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
TSmith@pcl.com 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00
Average 8.38 7.50 8.25 7.50 7.88 8.71
Courseware (cont)
Student
Language quality of the
courseware (grammar,
terminology, style) Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 8.00 5.57
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 9.00 8.71
aschoenherr@tep.com 9.00 9.00
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
dawn.shann@usecology.com 7.00 6.17
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 9.00 9.00
TSmith@pcl.com 8.00 8.00
Average 8.50 8.09
Business Results
Student
This training will
improve my job
performance. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 2.00 2.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 8.00 8.00
aschoenherr@tep.com 7.00 7.00
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
dawn.shann@usecology.com 7.00 7.00
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 9.00 9.00
TSmith@pcl.com 8.00 8.00
Average 7.38 7.38
Additional Questions
Student
How well did this
training meet your
expectations? Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 1.00 1.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 8.00 8.00
aschoenherr@tep.com 9.00 9.00
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
dawn.shann@usecology.com 7.00 7.00
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 9.00 9.00
TSmith@pcl.com 8.00 8.00
Average 7.50 7.50
Learning Effectiveness
- 2 / 8 -

3.
Student
I have learned new
knowledge/skills from
this training. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 2.00 2.00
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 8.00 8.00
aschoenherr@tep.com 7.00 7.00
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00
dawn.shann@usecology.com 7.00 7.00
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 9.00 9.00
TSmith@pcl.com 8.00 8.00
Average 7.38 7.38
Environment
Student
The physical
environment was
conducive to learning.
The hardware was setup
and functioning
appropriately. Average
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 8.00 9.00 8.50
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 8.00 7.00 7.50
aschoenherr@tep.com 5.00 6.00 5.50
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 9.00 9.00 9.00
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00
dawn.shann@usecology.com 6.00 6.00 6.00
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 9.00 9.00 9.00
TSmith@pcl.com 7.00 8.00 7.50
Average 7.63 7.88 7.75
Comments
Instructor
Comments: (Instructor)
aschoenherr@tep.com Carrie establishes what I think is the best rapport I've ever seen. And I've seen at least 40 trainers!!!
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 He did a good job
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com Carrie did a wonderful job explaining confusing topics. She was very patient and helpful when answering and assisting students.
User Information
First Name
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Daryl
aschoenherr@tep.com Amy
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 David
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com Michaela
cyndi.ross@usecology.com Cynthia
Last Name
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Knott
aschoenherr@tep.com Schoenherr
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 Coffman
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com Marshall
cyndi.ross@usecology.com Ross
- 3 / 8 -

4.
Phone Number
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 520­308­7151
aschoenherr@tep.com 520­396­2778
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 6172726797
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 603­882­4467
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 734­576­0130
What was your main objective for completing this training?
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
aschoenherr@tep.com Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
dawn.shann@usecology.com Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
cyndi.ross@usecology.com Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)
Courseware
What suggestions do you have for enhancing the courseware?
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 I don't know how the syllabus for this class can say "advanced formulas" There wasn't a single advanced formula in the whole class! We did
an "And" & "Or" function... Are you kidding me. Please provide more clarity on the course because this was a giant waste of time. The
syllabus made it sound like a challenging course when it reality this course was incredibly elementary and a humongous waste of time for
me!!
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com N/A
Overall Satisfaction
Overall, how satisfied are you with this training course? (check only one) [Student Data]
TSmith@pcl.com Somewhat satisfied
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Very satisfied
aschoenherr@tep.com Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 Very dissatisfied
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com Very satisfied
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 Very satisfied
dawn.shann@usecology.com Somewhat satisfied
cyndi.ross@usecology.com Very satisfied
Business Results
Based on your response to the prior question, estimate how much of the improvement will be a direct result of this training.
TSmith@pcl.com 20%
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 100%
aschoenherr@tep.com 10%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 10%
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 100%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 100%
- 4 / 8 -

5. dawn.shann@usecology.com 50%
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 80%
Estimate how much you expect your job performance related to the course subject matter to improve in the next 12 months.
Include in your estimate any performance improvements due to this training, as well as all other factors like on­the job
experience, incentives, and process improvements. (For example, if you feel that you can improve your performance by
20% in the next 12 months based on this training plus all other factors, enter 20% here.)
TSmith@pcl.com 20%
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 30%
aschoenherr@tep.com 10%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 10%
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 90%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 10%
dawn.shann@usecology.com 50%
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 40%
If you think this training will have a positive impact on your job performance, what areas will be impacted most? Check all
that apply.
TSmith@pcl.com increasing quality
TSmith@pcl.com increasing productivity
TSmith@pcl.com increasing sales
TSmith@pcl.com increasing ability to innovate
TSmith@pcl.com decreasing time to complete task(s)
TSmith@pcl.com decreasing costs
TSmith@pcl.com increasing customer satisfaction
TSmith@pcl.com increasing employee satisfaction
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com increasing ability to innovate
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com decreasing time to complete task(s)
aschoenherr@tep.com increasing quality
aschoenherr@tep.com increasing productivity
aschoenherr@tep.com decreasing time to complete task(s)
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com increasing quality
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com increasing productivity
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com decreasing time to complete task(s)
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 increasing quality
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 increasing productivity
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 increasing ability to innovate
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 decreasing time to complete task(s)
dawn.shann@usecology.com increasing productivity
cyndi.ross@usecology.com increasing quality
cyndi.ross@usecology.com increasing productivity
cyndi.ross@usecology.com increasing ability to innovate
cyndi.ross@usecology.com decreasing time to complete task(s)
cyndi.ross@usecology.com decreasing costs
cyndi.ross@usecology.com increasing customer satisfaction
cyndi.ross@usecology.com increasing employee satisfaction
- 5 / 8 -

6.
Additional Questions
Is this your first time at New Horizons?
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com No
aschoenherr@tep.com No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 Yes
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 No
cyndi.ross@usecology.com No
Would you recommend New Horizons to others?
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Yes
aschoenherr@tep.com Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 No
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 Yes
cyndi.ross@usecology.com Yes
Other classes you are interested in taking:
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com Microsoft Excel 2013­part 3
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 Excel 2013 Part 3, Pivot Tables
Would you be willing to provide a public quote about your experience taking this course?
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com Yes
aschoenherr@tep.com No
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com No
cyndi.ross@usecology.com No
Return on Investment
Would you like to be notified about advanced or complementary courses?
TSmith@pcl.com No
aschoenherr@tep.com No
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 No
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com Yes
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 No
cyndi.ross@usecology.com No
Job Impact
What percent of your total work time requires the knowledge or skills presented in this training? Please check only one.
TSmith@pcl.com 40%
Daryl_Knott@fmi.com 30%
aschoenherr@tep.com 20%
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 8 9 2 7 10%
MMarshall@OmniComponents.com 80%
- 6 / 8 -

7. A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 20%
dawn.shann@usecology.com 50%
cyndi.ross@usecology.com 40%
Environment
Comments (Environment):
aschoenherr@tep.com Monitors dirty/dusty. Given the Eastern exposure with the morning sun, I had to go find a towel to wipe the monitor down for adequate
viewing. Chairs and tables are quite worn.
A N O N Y M O U S 4 6 4 7 9 4 0 0 The lab was lagging a lot and the audio connection kept breaking up.
Response Rate
Form Type Evaluations
Sent
Evaluations
Received
Response
Rate
Post Event 8 8 100.00%
Report Recommendations
Interpreting the Report
Below are tips to help you understand the information in the report. For additional information, please click the Help tab above the report.
Summarizes scores from each student for selected question categories and questions; compare and analyze scores for all students that completed evaluations.
Student comments provide additional insight into the scores displayed within the report.
Determine the students’ overall perceived value derived specifically from training to proactively manage future training events.
Recommended Actions
Below are recommended next steps to take after reviewing the information in this report. Additionally, you'll find links to automatically run complementary reports for
drilling­down further into the data or analyzing the information in another way.
If any learner rated the class much lower than others, and the learner provided an email address, follow up with that person to gather additional feedback regarding the
scores. Share that feedback with instructor and course managers as areas for improvement.
If any learner rated the class much higher than others, especially in the areas of job impact or business results, follow up with those learners to gether additional feedback
on how they were able to maximize their use of what they learned on the job. Share this feedback with course managers to ensure they share the knowledge with future
learners to maximize job impact and business results.
Schedule this report to be emailed automatically to the course and instructor managers on a daily basis so they are able to review performance on a regular basis.
Recommended Links
Run the Learner Comments report to review all the qualitative feedback for specific approaches to make the learning more effective and impactful.
Run the Quick Question report to summarize the scale­based and multiple­choice answers for all of the evaluations.
Run the Performance to Goals report to view how these results compared to your goals.
Report Criteria
Reporting Date: Dec 1 2015 to Dec 31 2015
Form Type: Follow Up;
Instructor Survey;
Post Event
Category: Additional Questions;
Business Results;
Courseware;
Environment;
General Questions;
Instructor;
Job Impact;
Learning Effectiveness;
Overall Satisfaction;
- 7 / 8 -

8. ver. 001
Return on Investment;
User Information
Scale: 1 Low ­ 9 High
Class: Excel 2013 ­ Part 2 Dec 18, 2015
- 8 / 8 -