Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.
Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures
Through Collective Action
The Lessons that Olson Can Teach Us
@cameronneylon
http://o...
To read the paper search for
biorxiv neylon olson
• Collective (Public-Like) Goods are
difficult for large groups to
provision
• Small groups can work together
• Large grou...
Ways of beating the problem…
1. Oligopoly: Generally of funders or publishers, there are too many
institutions. EuropePMC ...
Crossref phased through all three approaches
Crossref provides a public good in the form of freely accessible
bibliographi...
Project
Infrastructure
Project
Infrastructure
Project
Infrastructure
“Find	
  a	
  
sustainability	
  
model”
Membership	
  Models
Subscriptions
Non-­‐collective	
  side-­‐product
Project
Infrastructure
No taxation without representation
• Broad coverage
• Stakeholder governed
• Non-discriminatory
• Transparent operations
• Cannot lobby
• Living will
• Incen...
1. Membership models are much less
applicable as a transitional model than we
would like (especially for open data)
2. If ...
@cameronneylon
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-716X
Slides: http://bit.ly/2oa04BF
Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures through Collective Action: The lessons that Olson can teach us
Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures through Collective Action: The lessons that Olson can teach us
Nächste SlideShare
Wird geladen in …5
×

Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures through Collective Action: The lessons that Olson can teach us

601 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

Talk given at OECD workshop on sustaining scholarly data infrastructures

Veröffentlicht in: Wissenschaft
  • Loggen Sie sich ein, um Kommentare anzuzeigen.

  • Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, denen das gefällt!

Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures through Collective Action: The lessons that Olson can teach us

  1. 1. Sustaining Scholarly Infrastructures Through Collective Action The Lessons that Olson Can Teach Us @cameronneylon http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-716X
  2. 2. To read the paper search for biorxiv neylon olson
  3. 3. • Collective (Public-Like) Goods are difficult for large groups to provision • Small groups can work together • Large groups can only succeed by applying one of three special cases • Oligopoly • Non-collective goods as a side effect • Compulsory funding (taxation)
  4. 4. Ways of beating the problem… 1. Oligopoly: Generally of funders or publishers, there are too many institutions. EuropePMC is an example. 2. Non-collective side-product: Needs to be a natural service or non- collective good generated as part of public good provisioning. Very few good examples in open data world and this is predictable, failure often results in a turn to a subscription model eg TAIR 3. Compulsion: Either compulsory membership models (professional certificationis an example) or top slicing/overheads models
  5. 5. Crossref phased through all three approaches Crossref provides a public good in the form of freely accessible bibliographic metadata and the infrastructure that supports it. Three phases 1. Effective oligopoly: 5-7 publishers dominate the space and were essentially able to act unilaterally to set up and support Crossref 2. Non-collective side benefit: Members join to be able to assign DOIs and to gain the benefits of traffic through the referrer 3. Compulsory contribution: No (STM) publisher will be taken seriously unless it is assigning Crossref DOIs. Membership is (close to) effectively compulsory for a serious publisher.
  6. 6. Project Infrastructure
  7. 7. Project Infrastructure
  8. 8. Project Infrastructure “Find  a   sustainability   model”
  9. 9. Membership  Models Subscriptions Non-­‐collective  side-­‐product
  10. 10. Project Infrastructure
  11. 11. No taxation without representation
  12. 12. • Broad coverage • Stakeholder governed • Non-discriminatory • Transparent operations • Cannot lobby • Living will • Incentivesto wind down • Time-limitedfunds only for time-limiteduses • Generate a surplus • Contingency fund • Revenue from services • Mission consistent • Can be “forked” • Open Source • Open Data • Available Data • Patent non-assertion Governance Financial sustainability Communityinsurance Bilder G,  Lin  J,  Neylon  C  2015  Principles  for  Open  Scholarly  Infrastructure-­v1,   Available  at  http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1314859
  13. 13. 1. Membership models are much less applicable as a transitional model than we would like (especially for open data) 2. If we accept a need to move to taxation models then organisations will need to be trusted by community
  14. 14. @cameronneylon http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-716X Slides: http://bit.ly/2oa04BF

×