Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

REDD+ MRV in Ethiopia

199 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

Presentation by Manuel Boissière on April 5, 2019 at Workshop in Ethiopia ("Forests and climate change: research results and implications for REDD+ and forest governance in Ethiopia")

Veröffentlicht in: Umweltschutz
  • Als Erste(r) kommentieren

REDD+ MRV in Ethiopia

  1. 1. REDD+ MRV in Ethiopia Review of the context, framework and progress Manuel Boissière, Solomon Zewdie, Melaku Bekele, Stibniati Atmadja Nexus Hotel, Addis Ababa, 5 April 2019
  2. 2. What is this presentation about? • REDD+ MRV context, framework and progresses until 2018 • Summarize results of Occasional Paper: https://www.cifor.org/li brary/7153 • Based on interviews, literature review and a workshop 2/20
  3. 3. Outline • Context o History o Forest definition o Functions of MRV o Spatial data • Framework o Institutional arrangements o Social aspects • Progress: o Current implementation o Challenges and opportunities 3/20
  4. 4. CONTEXT 4/20
  5. 5. History (1) Pre-REDD+ (1970s – 2010) • High deforestation and land degradation • Reforestation and afforestation promoted • Farmers encouraged to plant trees • PFM to increase community engagement Post REDD+ (2010 – present) • GTP and CRGE • MEFCC established (became EFCCC in 2018) • Start of REDD+, including REDD+ MRV 5/20
  6. 6. History (2) • 2013 - 2018: REDD+ readiness with financial support from Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, Norway, UK • 2013: ToR for developing capacities for national MRV system • 2014: NFI launched • 2015: New forest definition • 2016: MRV unit established in the ministry • 2017: institutional framework is developed for REDD+ MRV implementation; Final FRL submission to UNFCCC MRV Milestones (2010 – present) 6/20
  7. 7. Forest definition Ethiopia’s FRL FAO’s Forest Resource Assessment Land spanning at least 0.5 ha, covered by trees (incl bamboo) attaining a height of at least 2m and a canopy cover of at least 20% or trees with the potential to reach these thresholds in situ in due course Land spanning more than 0.5 hectares with trees higher than 5 meters and a canopy cover of more than 10 percent, or trees able to reach these thresholds in situ. It does not include land that is predominantly under agricultural or urban land use. 7/20
  8. 8. MRV Functions Monitoring • Impact of REDD+ policies and measures • The collection, storage, analysis and dissemination of data Measurement • forest area and forest change by satellite land monitoring system • changes in forest carbon stock per unit area by NFI • GHG inventory data. Reporting • Standardized, consistent national reporting Verification • Verify performance, reporting results, adjusting reports on REDD+ 8/20 Source: FDRE 2017
  9. 9. Spatial data and ground survey 5 interelated spatial datasets 1. LULC change map (2013) 2. Forest/non forest map o Forest: high forest, riverine forest, dense woodland, plantation, bamboo o Non-forest: agriculture, shrubland, grassland, builtup, bare land, water, no data 3. Forest area change (AD): average of annual forest loss and gain in hectares, 2000 and 2013 4. Carbon stock assessment (EFs) o 3 carbon pools: above, below ground and deadwood o 4 biomes: moist Afromontane forest, dry Afromontane forest, Combretum- Terminalia dry forest, Acacia-Commiphora dry forest 5. Forest Reference Level (2000-2013), based on 3 components: extent of forest area, AD, EF 9/20
  10. 10. FRAMEWORK 10/20
  11. 11. General framework • Decentralized management of REDD+ MRV • Defined roles and responsibilities at federal, regional and local levels • MRV unit’s responsibilities o produce, verify and disseminate forest statistics (AD, EF) o oversee overall REDD+ MRV activities • Permanent MRV entities at federal and regional levels • National REDD+ secretariat and regional counterparts are project-based 11/20
  12. 12. Institutional arrangement EFCCC (Commission) Forest sector Deputy Commissioner Environmental sector Deputy Commissioner Reference: MEFCC 2017 12/20
  13. 13. Participation of local communities (1) • Need to explore and test participatory monitoring approaches for MRV – highlighted in R-PP. • Necessary to sustain forest monitoring activities, reduce cost, and empower local communities • Still no engagement of local communities in REDD+ MRV; initiatives on forest monitoring in Participatory Forest Management (PFM). 13/20
  14. 14. Participation of local communities (2) 3 issues: • Social safeguards: SIS prepared but not yet implemented • Benefit sharing: different initiatives for Result Based Payments (OFLP, Bale Ecoregion) but need for a harmonised approach • Sustaining participation: need good motivation and incentive to participate 14/20
  15. 15. PROGRESS 15/20 Based on the discussions during the MRV workshop, October 6th, 2017, Addis Ababa
  16. 16. Current implementation • Crucial MRV deliverables: o LULC map o NFI completed o carbon stock data (EF) generated o national forest cover change (AD) analysed using Landsat imagery o national SIS being developed • National REDD+ MRV institutional arrangements have been established • Policies, guidelines for NFI and NFMS have been developed • Human capacity and MRV facilities are being built, in collaboration with FAO (in country MRV capacity building) and WGCF, through training 16/20
  17. 17. Challenges (1)Sectoral • Weak inter-sectoral coordination • Ministry (2013)  commission (2018) = possible implications on the coordination role of the commission for CRGE MRV activities Technical • Limited capacity for MRV of forest degradation • Limited incentives to maintain trained staff and avoid turnover • Insufficient in-country technical capacity to run the system Buy-in from local and national stakeholders • Little tangible action to enhance local people participation and to integrate participatory MRV into the national MRV system framework • Sustainable financing through direct national support is still needed to ensure national ownership 17/20
  18. 18. Challenges (2) Safeguards • Operationalizing SIS is still needed • Information sharing on SIS needs to be done at the local level for better engagement • Need better recognition of local communities’ rights on forests • Need to enforce implementation of environmental safeguards Benefit sharing • BSM activities still in a pilot stage, need to be developed at national level • Risk of raising expectations • Local people need to be better engaged in the BSM development 18/20
  19. 19. Opportunities • Government’s endorsement of an institutional framework for REDD+ MRV: important to ensure government’s ownership and sustainability of the MRV system • The recognition of the forestry sector’s vital role in the CRGE should allow a stronger political buy-in of Ethiopia’s REDD+ MRV • Ethiopia’s REDD+ MRV system development o Brings financial support to national capacity building on forest observation o Generates robust data about the sector o Helps modernize the forestry sector development and planning o Improves data transparency (MRV web portal) • National MRV capacity building (WGCF-NR) = opportunity to build local spatial data infrastructure and human capacity -> ensure sustainability 19/20
  20. 20. cifor.org forestsnews.cifor.org ForestsTreesAgroforestry.org THANK YOU / አመሰግናለሁ CONTACT: M.BOISSIERE@CGIAR.ORG

×