Tolerance And World Peace

Tolerance and World Peace
Tolerance and World PeaceWhat is the meaning of tolerance or world peace? Tolerance is the ability to the fundamental of other cultures without using
individuals or own culture to compare others. World peace is the freedom, peace, and happiness between all nations and people. The two articles,
"Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism" by Martha Nussbaum and "Don't Forget the Little Plattons" by Michael McConnel, explains the tolerance and
cultures. In my own understanding from the 2 articles, I think patriotism is opposite from the tolerance. However, the more patriotic the citizen is
towards their own country, they will become less tolerant of other cultures. Nussbaum argues that all citizens should act cosmopolitanism to be sure
there...show more content...
Most of my point of view of different culture or belief did come from teaching in school when I took a World Religion course in grade 10. I learn a
lot more about other beliefs and cultures more than usual. It was interesting because most culture have their own traditions that are practically the
same traditions than other cultures. I also learn the ideas from my family and realtives. I do believe that the students should learn and understand the
cultural teachings in school, so that they have a strong influence that could possibly change their perceptions. "They key to moral education is to
fuse the sentiments (especially love) to teaching of the good. We begin to do good because we love our preceptors (especially our parents); we want
to please them and we want to be like them. We continue to do good because that is the kind of person we have grown up to be." 9 (McConnel1996,
79) McConnell is trying to say in this quote is that tolerance start at home and than become more involving with the community. He also said that one
could be part of the local community even though cosmopolitanism states that. But, it cannot be forgotten that the main purpose is to look at the world
as a one society, world peace. Things will have to be accepted in some days where as it is possible that the communities maybe forgotten. To the
conclusion, the 2 articles "Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism" by Martha
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

International Free Trade and World Peace Essay
International Free Trade and World Peace
When analyzing trade's effect on state behavior, it is not the mere existence of trade between countries that should be central, rather, the nature of trade
that is crucial. This distinction will be explored by studying the arguments of key economic and political thinkers of both the 18th and 20th centuries.
The general nature of trade, the role of national government regarding trade and security, trade's capacity to befriend belligerent nations, and finally, the
influence of international economic institutions will be explored. In an attempt to present a fairly broad range of sources, this study features the ideas of
four influential authors from two time periods and continents: from the 18th...show more content...
For example, which countries would one consider practitioners of "free trade?" The United States, the proverbial torch carrier of open markets and
trade liberalization, maintains protectionist policies in several of its sectors such as agriculture. If we were to succeed in classifying each country
according to its openness in trade, how would we tally their conflicts? Again, in the case of the United States, this is particularly problematic. Despite
the active roles it has played in Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, and Kosovo, the United States has not officially declared war since entering W.W.II.
The True Nature of Trade
Trade's function in promoting peace or inciting conflict is an issue that exposes the fundamental antagonism between economic versus political thought.
Until the mid–19th Century, the issue was addressed by the mercantilist school of thought, which focused on the political (defense–related)
consequences of trade. Because wealth (or the accumulation of gold) was equated with power, international trade was regarded as a necessary evil,
practiced only with the utmost attentiveness to one's partner's gains, lest they exceed one's own.
In 1776, Adam Smith argued in The Wealth of Nations that the mercantilist system was futile and destructive to society as a whole. By redefining
wealth and proclaiming that political influence on trade was detrimental, Smith revolutionized economic thought. For this

Un Promotion Of World Peace
Chris Blythe
Professor John Conybeare
Introduction to International Relations Sec. AO1
6 November 2012
UN promotion of world peace Can world peace be attained? The answer depends on one's international relations view. A realist would reject the notion
of world peace, since conflict is the innate state of international politics. The liberal view would argue that world peace could be attained through
cooperation; the more modern neoliberals would add that it will take international organizations (IOs) and international law to enforce peace. Today,
there are hundreds of IOs, and the most powerful and most significant in terms of world peace, would be the United Nations. Founded in 1945 in San
Francisco, the UN replaced the League of Nations...show more content...
Collective security has become more of a theory than an actual practice for the UN. By definition, the UN needs to identify the aggressor in order
to proceed. Unfortunately, in most international disputes, it is hard to determine which state is the aggressor. It becomes even more difficult finding
the aggressor when trying restore peace in an intrastate conflict (Nye & Welch, 2011, p. 192). Not only is it hard to determine the aggressor, but it
is also difficult for the UN to agree on who is the aggressor. According to the UN charter, article 24, the Security Council has the "primary
responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security, and agree that in carrying out its duties under this responsibility the Security
Council acts on [UN's] behalf" (United Nations, 1945). It is the Security Council's duty to determine the aggressor in an international dispute, and
issue diplomatic policy to resolve the crisis. The Security Council has to approve measures against the threat to peace by a 60% decision with all
permanent members in the affirmative. It is rare that every member of the Security of Council can agree on who the aggressor is. Each member has their

Essay about World Peace is NOT Possible
Due to the nature of humankind, the imbalance in wealth and power, and diversity in culture and religion global peace is not a genuine possibility.
First, I will define human nature from a biblical prospective. I will then examine the state of nature in the context of Glaucon and Thomas Hobbes.
Finally, I will draw on the literature of Immanuel Kant, and Jean Baudrillard. For the greater good within us, we would all like to live in a world
without war, a world where competition is replaced by co–operation and individual freedom. However, this will never be; it was from the beginning of
creation, that the internal violence or conflict within humankind was manifested. Genesis 4:8, stated that, "Cain killed his brother Abel...show more
content...
In the article titled, "The spirit of Terrorism", by Jean Baudrillard, 2001, He captures the notion that "evil is everywhere and is an
incomprehensible object of desire" (pp.1). He further went on to explain that war is horrific and demeaning to humanity but it has its
contribution. Furthermore, war ended, European supremacy and the colonial era, Nazism and Communism. I support this argument, there is evil
all around us, lurking in wait. Many would argue that with war comes great suffering and pain, lost of lives, years of civilization has been wiped
out with just a bomb and individuals who survive war are often emotionally, physically, and psychological damage. For example, when the U.S.
dropped the bomb on Hiroshima. To rebuild a country to its original state after a war takes years but there is just cause for war. Hence, in the
context of war done to achieve what is deemed as the greater good, we can draw on the example of eliminating Nazism, European reined and the fall
of Sadam Hussian. Indeed, many innocent people lost their lives but the consequences of war are bloodshed and suffering. Glaucon myth, on the
Ring of Gyges revealed that all people are essentially egoistic and a good person is easily corrupted if the opportunity presents itself. Even though this
is a myth, I do believe it has a potential to be true. Take the military, marine, and the navy for example, both men and woman, have

Pros And Cons Of World Peace Essay
Introduction To Peace And Conflict Peace is when individuals can resolve their conflicts without violence and can cooperate to enhance the quality
of their lives. Peace is when everybody lives in security, without fear or danger of brutality and no type of violence is endured in law or practically
speaking everybody is equivalent under the watchful eye of the law. The frameworks for equity are trusted, and reasonable and powerful laws ensure
individuals' rights. Everybody can participate in forming political choices and the administration is responsible to the general population. Everybody
has reasonable and rise to access to the fundamental requirements for their wellbeing for example food, clean water, shelter, education, human services
and...show more content...
We have our own political, religious and personal ideals. We have our own opinions about how this world should be and how people should live in it.
Due to this we make hindrances, both physical and mental, which stop us making worldwide connections and relationships. The most important thing
is that by nature human beings tend to move toward conflict. It's in their nature. Especially the wars that have happened in the past have created a
legacy of hatred that has carried on from one generation to the other. Children at a very young age are taught to hate or differentiate between people of
different race, culture, religion etc. Our parents taught us we pass it to our next generation. In this way it becomes a never–ending

War and World Peace
Why We Never Need to Worry about World Peace
World Peace is something that will never happen. Too many countries have too much military power and don't want to give in to any other country.
War is something that the world is going to have to deal with because there has been very few years over the history of the world that have been
war free. Like one quote by an unknown author says, "Peace is rare: less than 8% of the time since the beginning of recorded time has the world been
entirely at peace. In a total of 3530 years, 286 have been warless. Eight thousand treaties have been broken in this time."
Albert Einstein, born on March 14, 1879 is one of the most influential people of the modern era. (Einstein) As a physicist he changed...show more
content...
In 1980 Graham dedicated the center. In 1992 it was announced by the BGEA that Billy Graham had Parkinson's disease, and he would be easing
back a little on his busy schedule. (Billy Graham Center Archives)
Billy Graham once said, "We must have military power to keep madmen from taking over the world." What he is trying to say is if a country has a
lot of military power that will deter someone from trying to take it over. It will make people think twice about trying to take over a country with a
powerful military, but it won't prevent all attacks from outside enemies. Just look at what happened on September 11, 2001. The U.S has one of
the most powerful militaries in the world and still got attacked. Hijackers ran two jets into the World Trade Center towers. Eventually the two
towers came crashing to the ground. President Bush stayed in the air on board Air Force One shortly after the attacks, but later addressed the nation
and said that he condemns evil and despicable acts and vowed revenge on whoever did it. (NYTimes) Some of the witnesses described the scene as
follows: "I'm so scared", "It took an hour to get out. Sometimes it was calm and orderly, other times it was complete bedlam", " I thought it was an
earthquake at first", and " People just kept jumping and jumping and jumping and you could still see they were alive because they were flailing
around." (ABC News) Those were just some quotes from eyewitnesses. That is just one example of how a

Peace
GLOBAL PEACE – FROM WHAT SOURCE? Song 65 1 MULTITUDES YEARN FOR GLOBAL PEACE On 28 June 1914 a hand grenade was
rolled beneath a car travelling in a motorcade in the city of Sarajevo in Yugoslavia. The grenade missed its intended target and exploded beneath the
following car, injuring several people. The first car continued on its way and the occupants attended a welcome ceremony at the Sarajevo Town Hall.
Just a short time later, the VIPs from the first car decided to visit the injured ones who had been taken to the local hospital. On the way there the car
stalled, this provided an opportunity for another assassin to shoot and kill the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, the Heir to the Austrian Empire
and his wife...show more content...
5.00 2 GLOBAL PEACE NOT ATTAINABLE THROUGH HUMAN EFFORTS What has been noted by Historians and scholars has been the
effect of WW1 on World Peace. Since the end of that war there has been numerous attempts by mankind to put in place systems to prevent conflicts
and ensure we can live in a worldwide peace. Yet can anyone say we live in a peaceful world? Well no we do not. Is it because mankind has lacked
effort in trying to make a lasting Peace? Perhaps we can examine efforts to create a worldwide peace but before we do so lets just see what the Bible
has to say about man controlling his own destiny. If we can turn to Jeremiah 10:23 Another scripture we can examine echoes this theme Ecclesiastes
8:9 So we can see that the Bible questions the ability of humans to control their own destiny. Well these words were written thousands of years ago– so
what has History proven about our ability to bring about worldwide peaceful conditions for mankind. Modern History is littered with Treaties and
Peace Agreements... yet we still live in a World dominated by unrest, conflict and ....war. The Treaty of Versailles was the first treaty signed after the
end of the First World War and it was a peace settlement between the main combatants in that war. The Treaty though had contentious and controversial
points and the politicians of the day knew they urgently needed something else– anything – to bring

What Is Peace? Essay
Humans are obsessed with categorizing. We split the people and things of the world into millions of groups and give them names, characteristics, and
stereotypes. Ethnicity, sexuality, religion, political view, genus and species: these all reflect the human's constant need to note, name, and categorize.
Still not convinced? Look at a dictionary. The fact that it was even created proves a tendency of the human mind to solidify things, their category, their
characteristics, and their definition. Most brains do not do well with the abstract noun. Words like love, justice, fairness, and peace bounce about and
cannot be tamed by a definition. This doesn't stop humans though. Our constant need to classify and define still raises the incessant...show more
content...
She brings up the creation of the United Nations after WWII and the atomic bomb, in order to exhibit the willingness of nations to strive collectively
for peace post–disaster. Corkalo claims that humans have natural psychological instincts that result in protectiveness and pride for the social, religious,
political, or racial group they belong to. This sense of self–importance and righteousness is the root problem of most conflict. Corkalo believes that
peace education would work to create intercultural training programs that break down the barriers of misconceptions, stereotypes, and discriminations,
while maintaining the worth and validity of each social group. Corkalo's proposal is ideal. I agree that giving the young generation the key to
intercultural understanding, equal opportunity, and worth would bring great peace. The decomposition of peace for the purpose of education is a
fascinating process that unveils its complexity and relevance to nearly all subjects. However, it is so complex that to teach its vast array of
components appears to be nearly impossible. If peace were attempted to be taught internationally, students would take extensive amounts of classes in
the fields of sociology, psychology, theology, political science, languages, and history. This line up of

War and Peace Essay
War and Peace
The greater threat to world peace in the 20s, 30s, and 40s is a point that could be argued and debated upon for essays on piles of essays. The true
threats of world peace were those who were naГЇve enough to believe that a people can be totally humiliated as the Germans were in the Treaty of
Versailles following World War I and not be subject to promises of regained glory. Throughout the 1920s, the world was relatively peaceful
–save
perhaps the Italian "revolution" by Mussolini who had his Fascist government set up fully by the year 1926 and the Beer Hall Putsch led by Adolf Hitler
in 1923.
With the crushing of the revolution by the Bavarian government (which was completely riddled full of...show more content...
He was then able to win a significant portion of the election of 1932 and was then appointed German Chancellor, but when the German President died
in 1934, the true march to the end of world peace was on. It first began with the attempt to acquire Austria as part of the German country, but that
attempt was quickly smacked down due to threats by Mussolini to use his own armies to stop Hitler's advance. However, this backbone was not
exerted by other "Allied Powers" of World War I. The United States had taken a isolationist stand on European politics, the only benefactors being the
new Fascist regimes in Europe. In 1934, Germany began open rearmament of its military and participated in the Spanish Revolution–a sort of sandbox
to play with their newly developed weapons and "Blitzkrieg" tactics. (http://www.sta.cathedral.org/depts/history/cho/ch20e.html)
With the growing power of Fascism in Europe, Britain and France were hoping to have a war between the newly formed USSR and Nazi Germany in
which both governments would destroy one another. The USSR, a French ally, was growing continually tired of France and Britain's appeasement
of Hitler. The "enforcing powers" (France and Britain) of the Versailles Treaty now basically giving Hitler a blank check to any area of land that he
wanted as long as he would be "satisfied." A game that had been played over the past two years

World Peace and Nonviolence
World Peace and Non–violence
Ganadhipati Tulsi
Society consists of innumerable individuals having a common bond. That bond is mutuality. Plurality constitutes collectivity, but mere collectivity does
not become society without the bond of mutuality. Without a common thread the beads would not make a rosary and it is of utmost importance to
examine and evaluate the thread.
We live as part of society and the unit of society is the individual. Like individuals like society and vice versa. The above relationship is both ways true
but relatively so. In modern times, society is conceived in terms of economic conditions and their management. It is assumed that if the latter are good
the individual will be good too. Behind this assumption is the...show more content...
Disarmament does offer a solution to the problem of war, but it cannot offer an adequate solution in the absence of a proper study of the factors
leading to a war. And these factors are expansionism, the tendency of some countries to impose their political system and life style on others and the
mentality of universal proselytization. We must address ourselves to finding the ways of removing these factors if we want to prevent wars and
establish world peace.
Non–violence: The Eternal Religion
Non–violence is an eternal religion but we do not accept it as such. Though violence is a negative tendency and non–violence a positive one, for all
practical purposes we have changed their places. As a matter of fact a serious misunderstanding has arisen because of the word non–violence, since it is
taken to mean the negation of violence.. It has led people to believe that violence and not non–violence is an unavoidable part of life. The rigmarole of
violence automatically comes to an end once non–violence is understood to be an inevitable part of life.
Problem of Non–violence
It is not difficult to prove the proposition that man has accorded full recognition to the need for and usefulness of violence. Today thousands of
scientists are busy inventing destructive weapons and thousands upon thousands of soldiers are either undergoing training in the use of arms or staging
war rehearsals. Thus all the three activities –– research, training and practice are going on in

Global Peace
We Smile in the Same Language
With a population of billions and more, the world is like one massive home to one big family. The family members speak different languages, practice
different religions, and have different lifestyles and a different way of thinking. But they are a family. Do what you can, put a thousand more
differences, create a hundred more tribulations, they'll remain what they always were: AFamily. Even if they don't give regard to this fact, it won't
change the truth; a family is a family even if they live a thousand miles apart. This is my vision of a perfectly peaceful and harmonious world. A
world bonded together by true love, not by color, not by language not by religion, only by love. This is how I want to see...show more content...
What is the point of it all? Don't these violence causing individuals realize that the world they are trying to create, one with terror and fear in its heart,
is the world their children and grand children are going to live in? The people they kill, the innocents that lose their lives in this terror campaign
actually have nothing to do with it.
Youth has implausible amounts of energy. They have the ability to do the impossible, and if inspired, they can change the world, change ideologies of
people, and change them for the better. The youth of today, if start trying to spread the righteous message of global peace, first at smaller level and
then at a much greater level, the unthinkable, unimaginable yet the sought after task of achieving global peace might just become a reality. We can
begin at our own minds, our own environments; start taking initiatives, hold peace rallies as is done by millions of schools and organizations around
the world. After all just one hand can heal another; just one spark starts a

Global Interdependence Essay
Global Interdependence
Hope for peace is difficult to have and even more difficult to maintain. This is especially true when throughout history we have been taught that war,
domination, and destruction are the only ways to deal with conflict. "The Histories" by Herodotus and "The Peloponnesian War" by Thucydides are
regarded as two of the greatest histories of all time and these stories give the impression that violence and war are inevitable and even desirable. Our
history is full of stories and influences like these, yet ever since the beginning of war; there has been a cry for peace. With the fighters of war, come the
empowered people for peace. There are many obstacles to overcome on the path to empowerment, ranging from constructed...show more content...
In order to achieve empowerment to act for peace, one needs to know on what to act and be passionate about the issues. An article in the "Left
Business Observer" stated that "many people don't want to know what goes on in the world. They're aware on some level that their government
does terrible things, but they'd rather not hear about it." It goes on to say that it is not even apathy, but "an active desire not to know." I agree with
the article, but I also see a huge possibility for change. My father is a perfect example of why I have hope for all those who are apathetic. My
father grew up in a conservative household, is registered as a republican, and he had no reason to stretch his comfortable life as a white, wealthy,
American male. When his father died, he found a new passion for education and making it affordable to all people, which was a primary concern for
his father. He acts to the extent that he can, and that is exactly enough. People come with different passions, capabilities, and skills and all are needed.
The little changes made will open the floodgates to many other opportunities to act.
The

Essay On Einstein's Stand For World Peace
Significant changes in history are often depicted through rebellions, which specifically comes from taking a stand for viewpoint based on the
conditions it presents. Einstein, a world–renowned German physician, believed in pacifism and such non–violent acts, so during World War II his ideal
for world peace was considered to be uncommon and rejected due to the majority seeking dominance and power through victory rather than equal
standing. Though without having any power or impact towards U.S. powers, Einstein was able to contribute towards a sense of world peace with not
only his idea, but instead many other ideas that coincided with his opinion. Einstein rejected military and common ideas when concerning the atomic
bombs. He assumed that the use of the atomic bomb would have not been necessary, and that the...show more content...
Peace among nations is an accomplishment that shows that Einstein had a stand because during that time peace was out of reach with all the hateful
emotions and actions exchanged between nations. Franklin D. Roosevelt's Fireside Chat, Announcing an Unlimited National Emergency, depicts a
government's dedicated actions for the people and that they are willing to go through many lengths to protect its people: The overwhelming majority of
our citizens expect their Government to see that the tools of defense are built; and for the very purpose of preserving the democratic safeguards of both
labor and management, this Government is determined to use all of its power to express the will of its people, and to prevent interference with the
production of materials essential to our nation's security. (Roosevelt, Announcing an Unlimited

Peace In Islam: Peace And Security In Islam
Peace And Security In Islam:
Islam is religion of peace. The concept of 'peace' in Islam draws its origins from the Arabic word "Salaam", which means "secured, pacified, or
submitted." .The literal meaning of Islam is "peace".
The concept of peace in Islam can be determined from the fact that while two Muslims meet they say which means "peace be unto you" in the
response it is answered that Which means that "peace be unto you too". We can define this scenario that even when two or more Muslims meet with
each other they send peace unto one another. They basically pray for each other that you may be safe from any harm. This gives us a rough thought
that how Islam is favoring peace and implements it in the lives of its followers.
One who becomes a Muslim not only enters a safe shelter but also guarantees it for others. The Holy Prophet...show more content...
Jihad is only for the purpose of ensuring security and peace in the region.
Security In Islam:
Islam is the security holder of its followers. Islam provides all types of protection to its followers. Islam is security holder of the life, rights, the
place or Nation, moral and spiritual values and all other things that a Muslim can be challenged about. The first thing that comes to people's mind
when they think of security has to do with laws. Laws are definitely important for security as they keep the parameters of acceptable behavior. In fact,
Islam is a religion that not only provides general principles for life but also provides detailed laws.
These laws further bring about peace and security. One of the main goals of Islamic law is the preservation and continuance of life. These laws are not
meant simply for the sake of punishment. Such laws are actually meant to protect life, as Allah

Peace Is The Absence Of War Analysis
"As globalisation has helped to spread the culture of violence, it has also helped to spread the need for global peace". The urge for peace increased
so much that the strategy of winning a war at all cost switched to the strategy where preventing a war became more important. Because peace is
such an essential factor in global society, adjectives are used to make the definition more detailed. Positive and negative peace were a result from
these adjustments. (Umoh & Udoh, 2011) The question I'm going to answer is whether peace is merely the absence of war. In my opinion, this isn't
true and I'm going to explain my answer in this essay. Firstly I'll mention the renewed definition of peace, which was a result of the new definition of
violence....show more content...
There is no universally accepted authority who can decide what peace is. This result in the chance that the definition of peace can be different
between societies, groups and individuals. So for a society which is in war and armed conflicts, peace can be the absence of war. But comparable, a
society which suffers from unfair structures and policies, sees peace as having justice and equal opportunities. (Francis, 2006) Because peace has a
different meaning for everyone, arguing that peace is merely the absence of war would be oversimplified. It can be the meaning for some people, but it
isn't the general

Through my studies and research I have come to the
following conclusion about the League of Nations: despite
all of President Woodrow Wilson's efforts, the League was
doomed to fail. I feel this was so for many reasons, some
of which I hope to convey in the following report. From the
day when Congress voted on the Fourteen Points, it was
obvious that the League had a very slim chance of being
passed in Congress, and without all of the World powers, the
League had little chance of surviving.
On November 11, 1918 an armistice was declared in
Europe. Wilson saw the opportunity to form an international
organization of peace to be formed. He acted quickly. On
January 18, 1919 he released his fourteen points. The
Fourteen Points...show more content...

Before World War II, the assembly convened
regularly at Geneva in September. There were three
representatives for every member state each state having one
vote. The council met at least three times a year to
consider political disputes and reduction of armaments.
The council had several permanent members, France,
Great Britan, Italy, Japan, and later Germany and the Soviet
Union. It also had several nonpermanent members which were
elected by the assembly. The council's decisions had to be
unanimous.
The secretariat was the administrative branch of the
League and consisted of a secretary, general, and a staff of
five hundred people. Several other organizations were
associated with the League– the Permanent Court of
International Justice, also called the World Court, and the
International Labor Organization.
One important activity of the League was the
disposition of certain territories that had been colonies of

Germany and Turkey before World War I. Territories were
awarded to the League members in the form of mandates. The
mandated territories were given different degrees of
independence in accordance with their geographic situation,
their stage of development, and their economic status.
The League, unfortunately, rarely implemented its
available resources, limited through the were, to achieve
their goal, to end war. The League can be credited with
certain social achievements. these achievements include
settlement of

Everybody's talking about
Bagism, Shagism, Dragism, Madism
Ragism, Tagism, this–ism, that–ism
Ism ism ism
All we are saying is give peace a chance
Lyrics from the song, "Give Peace A Chance" by John Lennon
Is globalism just another "ism" to be feared and loathed? Despite some obvious negative effects of globalism, or globalization, we need to recognize
the potential of globalization to help achieve worldwide peace and prosperity. Many people have written papers demonstrating globalization's
contribution to structural violence and income inequality. However, these problems stem from the current manifestation of globalization, not from its
basic tenets. The ideals of free trade, global opportunity, and economic interaction...show more content...
Whereas the Cold War era was characterized by protectionist policies and nationalistic beliefs that encouraged competition, the globalized world has the
potential to be an integrated and interdependent group that aims to work together to benefit everyone. Once countries progress from a competitive
focus on "beating" other nations, a cooperative union that takes advantage of world resources to defeat injustice and violence will be born.
In her book on global monetary warfare, Hazel Henderson illustrates the economic advantages of globalization. In an economic model where all
nations are interdependent, it is to the benefit of everyone to work towards financial growth and expansion. Increased economic prosperity would help
fight poverty and other forms of structural violence as well as decrease the occurrence of "difficult life conditions" that often make individuals and
groups susceptible to violence (Wagner and Long 211). In addition, traditional, primarily economically motivated wars between two or more nations
would become unnecessary in a prosperous world.
Most importantly, a globalized society would promote the ultimate cooperation needed to achieve true and complete peace. An integrated world would
help destroy the divisions that plague communities around the globe by making every person, group, and nation

Thesis Statement For World Peace
Thesis Statement
World peace is a topic chosen to prove that there is currently no possible way for us, humans, to achieve peace between all the nations without us
having to deal with current problems we have now. The study of the topic has been quite hard, but fascinating as the research forehand has to lead me
to discover more unknown problems that are likely to be preventing us from world peace. With evidence from credible articles, the paper determines
that a solution to a war–free world without any problems is quite impossible. The evidence in the paper includes overpopulation effects, current
arguments that can be possibly leading on to fatal war, and the design of the human brain which may be the direct cause of the violence that goes on in
the world today. The evidence gathered will help assist that World Peace will not be happening in the world anytime soon.
Methodology
My topic of World Peace began to develop as I felt the need to address the idea of World Peace. In addition, I selected this topic to confirm that the
idea was impossible to achieve. Through a long period of research, I began to learn about World Peace. As I was studying the topic, I was lead to
many websites and articles to support my claim, a possible way to achieve World peace was nonchalant. Scholarly articles, written news stories, and
credible websites assisted me in learning more about the possible conflicts that can prevent this idea from becoming true. I learned how many of the

World Peace
WORLD PEACE & SECURITY
WORLD PEACE
World peace is an ideal of freedom, peace, and happiness among and within all nations and/or people. World peace is an idea of planetary non–violence
by which nations willingly cooperate, either voluntarily or by virtue of a system of governance that prevents warfare. The term is sometimes used to
refer to a cessation of all hostility among all individuals. For example, World Peace could be crossing boundaries via human rights, technology,
education, engineering, medicine, diplomats and/or an end to all forms of fighting.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Possibility
While world peace is theoretically possible, some believe that human nature inherently prevents it.[1][2] This...show more content...
United Nations Charter and International law
After the World War II, United Nations has been established by United Nations Charter to "save successing generations from the two scourge of war
which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind".[17] The Preamble to the United Nations Charter also aims to regain faith in
fundamental human rights, to respect obligation of sources of international law as well as to unite our strength to maintain international peace and
security. And all treaties on international human rights law recall or consider "the principles proclaimed in the Chater of the United Nations,
recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and
peace in the world".
Globalization
Gordon B. Hinkley saw a trend in national politics by which city–states and nation–states have unified, and suggest that the international arena will
eventually follow suit. Many countries such as China, Italy, the United States, Germany, India and Britain have unified into

Tolerance And World Peace

Tolerance And World Peace

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Tolerance And World Peace

Similar a Tolerance And World Peace(20)

Más de Buy Custom Paper Pittsburg

Más de Buy Custom Paper Pittsburg(20)

Último

Último(20)

Tolerance And World Peace