SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 5
State/RSD/McDonogh32 ElementarySchool(MES) Data
MES BreakdownofData 2013-2015
STUDENT LEARNING TARGETSFOR 2014-2015
My students’ scores qualified me to receive a score of a 4 for Exceeding my SLT goals
Student Learning Target
Grade:
5th
Subject:
Mathematics
Interval ofInstruction:
Full Year 2014-2015
1. WHAT SHOULD STUDENTS KNOWAND BEABLE TO DO? HOWWILL I MEASURE SUCCESS?
 What content will I prioritize?
o What standards are most tied to success?
o What prior knowledge will they need to be successful?
 What assessment will provide the best evidence of my students’ mastery of the priority content at the end
of the year?
o Will this assessment method enable me to determine how students are progressing throughout the
year?
Priority Content:
CCSS Mathematics for Grade 5 indicate that instruction time should focus on three critical areas:
(1) developingfluencywithadditionandsubtractionof fractions,anddevelopingunderstandingof the multiplicationof
fractionsandof divisionof fractionsinlimitedcases(unitfractionsdividedbywhole numbersandwhole numbers
dividedbyunitfractions;
(2) extendingdivisionto 2-digitdivisors,integratingdecimal fractionsintothe place value systemanddeveloping
understandingof operationswithdecimalstohundredths,anddevelopingfluencywithwholenumberanddecimal
operations;
(3) developingunderstandingof volume.
Sources: 3rd
-5th
Grade Louisiana Mathematics Guidebook, PARCC ModelContent Framework for Grades 3-5 (page 22),
CCSS Mathematics
End-of-Year Assessment Method and Name: I am using a 5th
grade common end of year state assessment. This
assessment will determine student mastery of 5.NBT.1-7, 5.NF.1-7, 5.MD.1-5, 5.OA.1-3. These tasks are aligned to the task
types described in the 2014-2015 PARCC Assessment Guide and assess students mastery of Priority Content. Various sources were
used to create the assessment including EAGLE and the 3-5 LDE Guidebook. Student responses will be scored using correct
responses and exemplars for each item.
2. WHAT DO STUDENTS KNOWAND WHAT ARE THEYABLE TO DO NOW?
 What knowledge/skills are related to success with this year’s priority content?
 What data sources and background information are available?
 What diagnostic assessment resources are available?
 What can I conclude [insert hyperlink to support docs] about students’ mastery of prior knowledge and
skills?
 Based on the data, what can I conclude about students’ readiness?
I reviewed 2014-2015 4th grade PARCC results of my 75 students and calculated the average percent correct for each of the
five reporting categories: 64% - Operations and Algebraic Thinking; 61% - Numbers and Operations in Base Ten; 58% -
Numbers and Operations – Fractions; 67% - Measurement and Data; 63% - Geometry.
Based on these results, I can conclude:
1) All students will need targeted practice with prerequisite skills inall major clusters in order to achieve success in 5th grade
2. WHAT DO STUDENTS KNOWAND WHAT ARE THEYABLE TO DO NOW?
 What knowledge/skills are related to success with this year’s priority content?
 What data sources and background information are available?
 What diagnostic assessment resources are available?
 What can I conclude [insert hyperlink to support docs] about students’ mastery of prior knowledge and
skills?
 Based on the data, what can I conclude about students’ readiness?
math.
2) Numbers and Operations in Fractions has the largest room for growth and is the target area students struggled with the
most. B
3) All students will need severe intervention for skills further back than the 4th grade.
3. IS THERE A GROUP OF STUDENTS ON WHICH I SHOULD FOCUS THIS LEARNING TARGET?
 Have I set learning targets for all of my students?
 Whichsubgroups in my school population need additional support to achieve success?
 Whichstudents willneed additional support to achieve success?
Population: All 60 students will require targeted remedial support in order to be successfulwith current grade level standards.
Therefore, all of my students (60) are the focus of this Student Learning Target.
Identified Population: Ten students have been identified as needing additional individualized support in order to be successful. These
students include two students who have been retained, as well as students with IEPs and 504s. My goal for these students is forthem
to meet or exceed 75% on the EOY assessment. If four of these students fromthis group score 75% or higher, I will consider that
outstanding.
STUDENT LEARNING TARGET:
 What level of performance on the end-of-year assessment from Step 1 do I expect the identified student
population to achieve?
I expect to raise the average score from 58% in Numbers and Operation – Fractions to an average score of 75% in this targeted area.
That will showa 12% increase in that area alone.
SCORING PLAN:
 How will you measure your students’ success?
 Based on students’ baseline data, what is the minimum level of performance I expect fromthe identified
students?
 Based on students’ baseline data, how many students can reasonably be expected to meet or exceed the
expected levelof performance?
Insufficient Attainment of
Target (1 point):
The teacher has demonstrated an
insufficient impact on student
learning by falling far short of the
target.
Partial Attainment of Target
(2 points):
The teacher has demonstrated
some impact on student learning,
but did not meet the target.
Full Attainment of Target
(3 points):
The teacher has demonstrated a
considerable impact on student
learning by meeting the target.
Exceptional Attainment of
Target (4 points):
The teacher has demonstrated an
outstanding impact on student
learning by surpassing the target
by a meaningful margin.
Achievement range: 0 – 54%
of mystudentsscore 54%
or below.
Achievement range: 54% -
60% of my studentsscore
55-59%.
Achievement range: 60-65%
(44) of my students will
achievea scoreof basic or
above.
Achievement range: >66% or
higherof my studentswill
achieve ascore of basic or
above
4. HOWWILL I MONITOR PROGRESS?
 When will I monitor students’ developing mastery of the priority content?
 What curricular resources and assessment methods will I use to determine students’ mastery of the
priority content on an on-going basis?
o Are these assessment methods aligned with the end-of-year assessment identified in Step 1?
Ongoing
As I create lessons throughout the year, I will:
1) use the 5th Grade Remediation Guide to determine student readiness fortheir current grade level standards
2) assess all major content for the 5th grade using extended and constructed response methods from previous state tests,as well as
from the common core development literature as well as other teacher development materials such as Link-it
3) administer weekly assessments that includes tasks aligned to the current quarters standards
4) administer mini benchmark exams every two weeks that include tasks aligned to the current quarters standards
Checkpoint 1
I will assess student progressin October
using an assessment developed from Link-
it created by our coaching staff and
administrators.
I-Ready diagnostic data
Benchmark Assessment 1
Practice tests
Checkpoint 2
I will assess student progress in December
using an assessment developed from Link-
it by our coaching staff and administrators.
Mini Tests
Benchmark Assessment 2
Checkpoint 3
I will assess student progressin February
using an assessment developed from Link-
it by our coaching staff and administrators.
ILEAP/PARCC
Benchmark Assessment 3
Mini Tests

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Student Learning Initiatives (R)
Student Learning Initiatives (R)Student Learning Initiatives (R)
Student Learning Initiatives (R)WSU Cougars
 
Handout 3 SSE case study school (self-evaluation report: literacy)
Handout 3 SSE case study school (self-evaluation report: literacy)Handout 3 SSE case study school (self-evaluation report: literacy)
Handout 3 SSE case study school (self-evaluation report: literacy)Martin Brown
 
Pierce county WAVA - CCSS - Gohen
Pierce county WAVA - CCSS - GohenPierce county WAVA - CCSS - Gohen
Pierce county WAVA - CCSS - Gohenpcwava
 
Sse pp 11 november 2013 (1)
Sse pp   11 november 2013 (1)Sse pp   11 november 2013 (1)
Sse pp 11 november 2013 (1)Martin Brown
 
Write Sample-Spring 2016 Success Counseling Report
Write Sample-Spring 2016 Success Counseling ReportWrite Sample-Spring 2016 Success Counseling Report
Write Sample-Spring 2016 Success Counseling ReportNathan Menacher
 
Developing an instructional strategy
Developing an instructional strategyDeveloping an instructional strategy
Developing an instructional strategyAngel Jones
 
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014Sse workshop 2 spring 2014
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014Martin Brown
 
RTI Fall 2013 C & I Meeting
RTI Fall 2013 C & I MeetingRTI Fall 2013 C & I Meeting
RTI Fall 2013 C & I MeetingKeith Eades
 
Stakeholder feedback data
Stakeholder feedback dataStakeholder feedback data
Stakeholder feedback datalyacosta09
 
Using Assessment Data for Educator and Student Growth
Using Assessment Data for Educator and Student GrowthUsing Assessment Data for Educator and Student Growth
Using Assessment Data for Educator and Student GrowthNWEA
 
LHS TKES orientation powerpoint 19 20
LHS TKES orientation powerpoint 19 20LHS TKES orientation powerpoint 19 20
LHS TKES orientation powerpoint 19 20Kelli Schuyler
 
teaching material
teaching material teaching material
teaching material Kadek Astiti
 
Assessment information pp website
Assessment information pp websiteAssessment information pp website
Assessment information pp websiteMartin Brown
 
Handout 2: SSE case study: The SSE journey for our case study school
Handout 2: SSE case study: The SSE journey for our case study schoolHandout 2: SSE case study: The SSE journey for our case study school
Handout 2: SSE case study: The SSE journey for our case study schoolMartin Brown
 
Diac Dodge City Middle School Revised 3 28 10
Diac Dodge City Middle School Revised 3 28 10Diac Dodge City Middle School Revised 3 28 10
Diac Dodge City Middle School Revised 3 28 10Dodge City Public Schools
 

Was ist angesagt? (18)

Student Learning Initiatives (R)
Student Learning Initiatives (R)Student Learning Initiatives (R)
Student Learning Initiatives (R)
 
Handout 3 SSE case study school (self-evaluation report: literacy)
Handout 3 SSE case study school (self-evaluation report: literacy)Handout 3 SSE case study school (self-evaluation report: literacy)
Handout 3 SSE case study school (self-evaluation report: literacy)
 
Pierce county WAVA - CCSS - Gohen
Pierce county WAVA - CCSS - GohenPierce county WAVA - CCSS - Gohen
Pierce county WAVA - CCSS - Gohen
 
Sse pp 11 november 2013 (1)
Sse pp   11 november 2013 (1)Sse pp   11 november 2013 (1)
Sse pp 11 november 2013 (1)
 
Write Sample-Spring 2016 Success Counseling Report
Write Sample-Spring 2016 Success Counseling ReportWrite Sample-Spring 2016 Success Counseling Report
Write Sample-Spring 2016 Success Counseling Report
 
MR_HRS
MR_HRSMR_HRS
MR_HRS
 
Developing an instructional strategy
Developing an instructional strategyDeveloping an instructional strategy
Developing an instructional strategy
 
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014Sse workshop 2 spring 2014
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014
 
RTI Fall 2013 C & I Meeting
RTI Fall 2013 C & I MeetingRTI Fall 2013 C & I Meeting
RTI Fall 2013 C & I Meeting
 
Stakeholder feedback data
Stakeholder feedback dataStakeholder feedback data
Stakeholder feedback data
 
Using Assessment Data for Educator and Student Growth
Using Assessment Data for Educator and Student GrowthUsing Assessment Data for Educator and Student Growth
Using Assessment Data for Educator and Student Growth
 
LHS TKES orientation powerpoint 19 20
LHS TKES orientation powerpoint 19 20LHS TKES orientation powerpoint 19 20
LHS TKES orientation powerpoint 19 20
 
teaching material
teaching material teaching material
teaching material
 
Wsu principals presentation
Wsu principals presentationWsu principals presentation
Wsu principals presentation
 
Assessment information pp website
Assessment information pp websiteAssessment information pp website
Assessment information pp website
 
Handout 2: SSE case study: The SSE journey for our case study school
Handout 2: SSE case study: The SSE journey for our case study schoolHandout 2: SSE case study: The SSE journey for our case study school
Handout 2: SSE case study: The SSE journey for our case study school
 
Diac Dodge City Middle School Revised 3 28 10
Diac Dodge City Middle School Revised 3 28 10Diac Dodge City Middle School Revised 3 28 10
Diac Dodge City Middle School Revised 3 28 10
 
Readi step parents
Readi step parentsReadi step parents
Readi step parents
 

Ähnlich wie PARCC.Results

Purposeful assessments
Purposeful assessmentsPurposeful assessments
Purposeful assessmentsMary Miller
 
Guidelines on the assessment and rating of learning outcomes under the k to 1...
Guidelines on the assessment and rating of learning outcomes under the k to 1...Guidelines on the assessment and rating of learning outcomes under the k to 1...
Guidelines on the assessment and rating of learning outcomes under the k to 1...Joey Miñano
 
Briargrove Elementary Assessment Policy 2013-2014
Briargrove Elementary Assessment Policy 2013-2014Briargrove Elementary Assessment Policy 2013-2014
Briargrove Elementary Assessment Policy 2013-2014eellswor
 
Assessment of learning
Assessment of learningAssessment of learning
Assessment of learningArneyo
 
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Convention
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 ConventionMSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Convention
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Conventionmarylandeducators
 
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014Sse workshop 2 spring 2014
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014Martin Brown
 
From Throwing Stones to Creating Ripples Ramapo’s Approach to Student Success
From Throwing Stones to Creating Ripples Ramapo’s Approach to Student SuccessFrom Throwing Stones to Creating Ripples Ramapo’s Approach to Student Success
From Throwing Stones to Creating Ripples Ramapo’s Approach to Student SuccessHobsons
 
NYSCOSS Conference Superintendents Training on Assessment 9 14
NYSCOSS Conference Superintendents Training on Assessment 9 14NYSCOSS Conference Superintendents Training on Assessment 9 14
NYSCOSS Conference Superintendents Training on Assessment 9 14NWEA
 
Draft 5 year pd continuum june 10
Draft 5 year pd continuum   june 10Draft 5 year pd continuum   june 10
Draft 5 year pd continuum june 10qrobertson
 
Criteria for curriculum assessment
Criteria for curriculum assessmentCriteria for curriculum assessment
Criteria for curriculum assessmentArmilyn Nadora
 
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION.pptx
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION.pptxASSESSMENT and EVALUATION.pptx
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION.pptxGIRLYCAMACHO
 
Seven purposes presentation
Seven purposes presentationSeven purposes presentation
Seven purposes presentationJohn Cronin
 
5 year pd continuum sept. 9
5 year pd continuum   sept. 95 year pd continuum   sept. 9
5 year pd continuum sept. 9qrobertson
 
Teach NJ project SGO presentation 2013-14
Teach NJ project SGO presentation 2013-14Teach NJ project SGO presentation 2013-14
Teach NJ project SGO presentation 2013-14WHSwarriors
 
Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the k to 12 program
Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the k to 12 programAssessment of Learning Outcomes in the k to 12 program
Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the k to 12 programKerwin Palpal
 

Ähnlich wie PARCC.Results (20)

Planning for assessment
Planning for assessmentPlanning for assessment
Planning for assessment
 
Purposeful assessments
Purposeful assessmentsPurposeful assessments
Purposeful assessments
 
Guidelines on the assessment and rating of learning outcomes under the k to 1...
Guidelines on the assessment and rating of learning outcomes under the k to 1...Guidelines on the assessment and rating of learning outcomes under the k to 1...
Guidelines on the assessment and rating of learning outcomes under the k to 1...
 
Briargrove Elementary Assessment Policy 2013-2014
Briargrove Elementary Assessment Policy 2013-2014Briargrove Elementary Assessment Policy 2013-2014
Briargrove Elementary Assessment Policy 2013-2014
 
Assessment of learning
Assessment of learningAssessment of learning
Assessment of learning
 
Oce smart goals
Oce smart goalsOce smart goals
Oce smart goals
 
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Convention
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 ConventionMSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Convention
MSDE Presentation on Student Learning Objectives: MSEA 2013 Convention
 
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014Sse workshop 2 spring 2014
Sse workshop 2 spring 2014
 
From Throwing Stones to Creating Ripples Ramapo’s Approach to Student Success
From Throwing Stones to Creating Ripples Ramapo’s Approach to Student SuccessFrom Throwing Stones to Creating Ripples Ramapo’s Approach to Student Success
From Throwing Stones to Creating Ripples Ramapo’s Approach to Student Success
 
NYSCOSS Conference Superintendents Training on Assessment 9 14
NYSCOSS Conference Superintendents Training on Assessment 9 14NYSCOSS Conference Superintendents Training on Assessment 9 14
NYSCOSS Conference Superintendents Training on Assessment 9 14
 
K to 12
K to 12K to 12
K to 12
 
EVAAS
EVAAS EVAAS
EVAAS
 
Draft 5 year pd continuum june 10
Draft 5 year pd continuum   june 10Draft 5 year pd continuum   june 10
Draft 5 year pd continuum june 10
 
Criteria for curriculum assessment
Criteria for curriculum assessmentCriteria for curriculum assessment
Criteria for curriculum assessment
 
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION.pptx
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION.pptxASSESSMENT and EVALUATION.pptx
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION.pptx
 
Seven purposes presentation
Seven purposes presentationSeven purposes presentation
Seven purposes presentation
 
5 year pd continuum sept. 9
5 year pd continuum   sept. 95 year pd continuum   sept. 9
5 year pd continuum sept. 9
 
NASPA AnP 2014
NASPA AnP 2014NASPA AnP 2014
NASPA AnP 2014
 
Teach NJ project SGO presentation 2013-14
Teach NJ project SGO presentation 2013-14Teach NJ project SGO presentation 2013-14
Teach NJ project SGO presentation 2013-14
 
Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the k to 12 program
Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the k to 12 programAssessment of Learning Outcomes in the k to 12 program
Assessment of Learning Outcomes in the k to 12 program
 

PARCC.Results

  • 2.
  • 3. STUDENT LEARNING TARGETSFOR 2014-2015 My students’ scores qualified me to receive a score of a 4 for Exceeding my SLT goals Student Learning Target Grade: 5th Subject: Mathematics Interval ofInstruction: Full Year 2014-2015 1. WHAT SHOULD STUDENTS KNOWAND BEABLE TO DO? HOWWILL I MEASURE SUCCESS?  What content will I prioritize? o What standards are most tied to success? o What prior knowledge will they need to be successful?  What assessment will provide the best evidence of my students’ mastery of the priority content at the end of the year? o Will this assessment method enable me to determine how students are progressing throughout the year? Priority Content: CCSS Mathematics for Grade 5 indicate that instruction time should focus on three critical areas: (1) developingfluencywithadditionandsubtractionof fractions,anddevelopingunderstandingof the multiplicationof fractionsandof divisionof fractionsinlimitedcases(unitfractionsdividedbywhole numbersandwhole numbers dividedbyunitfractions; (2) extendingdivisionto 2-digitdivisors,integratingdecimal fractionsintothe place value systemanddeveloping understandingof operationswithdecimalstohundredths,anddevelopingfluencywithwholenumberanddecimal operations; (3) developingunderstandingof volume. Sources: 3rd -5th Grade Louisiana Mathematics Guidebook, PARCC ModelContent Framework for Grades 3-5 (page 22), CCSS Mathematics End-of-Year Assessment Method and Name: I am using a 5th grade common end of year state assessment. This assessment will determine student mastery of 5.NBT.1-7, 5.NF.1-7, 5.MD.1-5, 5.OA.1-3. These tasks are aligned to the task types described in the 2014-2015 PARCC Assessment Guide and assess students mastery of Priority Content. Various sources were used to create the assessment including EAGLE and the 3-5 LDE Guidebook. Student responses will be scored using correct responses and exemplars for each item. 2. WHAT DO STUDENTS KNOWAND WHAT ARE THEYABLE TO DO NOW?  What knowledge/skills are related to success with this year’s priority content?  What data sources and background information are available?  What diagnostic assessment resources are available?  What can I conclude [insert hyperlink to support docs] about students’ mastery of prior knowledge and skills?  Based on the data, what can I conclude about students’ readiness? I reviewed 2014-2015 4th grade PARCC results of my 75 students and calculated the average percent correct for each of the five reporting categories: 64% - Operations and Algebraic Thinking; 61% - Numbers and Operations in Base Ten; 58% - Numbers and Operations – Fractions; 67% - Measurement and Data; 63% - Geometry. Based on these results, I can conclude: 1) All students will need targeted practice with prerequisite skills inall major clusters in order to achieve success in 5th grade
  • 4. 2. WHAT DO STUDENTS KNOWAND WHAT ARE THEYABLE TO DO NOW?  What knowledge/skills are related to success with this year’s priority content?  What data sources and background information are available?  What diagnostic assessment resources are available?  What can I conclude [insert hyperlink to support docs] about students’ mastery of prior knowledge and skills?  Based on the data, what can I conclude about students’ readiness? math. 2) Numbers and Operations in Fractions has the largest room for growth and is the target area students struggled with the most. B 3) All students will need severe intervention for skills further back than the 4th grade. 3. IS THERE A GROUP OF STUDENTS ON WHICH I SHOULD FOCUS THIS LEARNING TARGET?  Have I set learning targets for all of my students?  Whichsubgroups in my school population need additional support to achieve success?  Whichstudents willneed additional support to achieve success? Population: All 60 students will require targeted remedial support in order to be successfulwith current grade level standards. Therefore, all of my students (60) are the focus of this Student Learning Target. Identified Population: Ten students have been identified as needing additional individualized support in order to be successful. These students include two students who have been retained, as well as students with IEPs and 504s. My goal for these students is forthem to meet or exceed 75% on the EOY assessment. If four of these students fromthis group score 75% or higher, I will consider that outstanding. STUDENT LEARNING TARGET:  What level of performance on the end-of-year assessment from Step 1 do I expect the identified student population to achieve? I expect to raise the average score from 58% in Numbers and Operation – Fractions to an average score of 75% in this targeted area. That will showa 12% increase in that area alone. SCORING PLAN:  How will you measure your students’ success?  Based on students’ baseline data, what is the minimum level of performance I expect fromthe identified students?  Based on students’ baseline data, how many students can reasonably be expected to meet or exceed the expected levelof performance? Insufficient Attainment of Target (1 point): The teacher has demonstrated an insufficient impact on student learning by falling far short of the target. Partial Attainment of Target (2 points): The teacher has demonstrated some impact on student learning, but did not meet the target. Full Attainment of Target (3 points): The teacher has demonstrated a considerable impact on student learning by meeting the target. Exceptional Attainment of Target (4 points): The teacher has demonstrated an outstanding impact on student learning by surpassing the target by a meaningful margin. Achievement range: 0 – 54% of mystudentsscore 54% or below. Achievement range: 54% - 60% of my studentsscore 55-59%. Achievement range: 60-65% (44) of my students will achievea scoreof basic or above. Achievement range: >66% or higherof my studentswill achieve ascore of basic or above
  • 5. 4. HOWWILL I MONITOR PROGRESS?  When will I monitor students’ developing mastery of the priority content?  What curricular resources and assessment methods will I use to determine students’ mastery of the priority content on an on-going basis? o Are these assessment methods aligned with the end-of-year assessment identified in Step 1? Ongoing As I create lessons throughout the year, I will: 1) use the 5th Grade Remediation Guide to determine student readiness fortheir current grade level standards 2) assess all major content for the 5th grade using extended and constructed response methods from previous state tests,as well as from the common core development literature as well as other teacher development materials such as Link-it 3) administer weekly assessments that includes tasks aligned to the current quarters standards 4) administer mini benchmark exams every two weeks that include tasks aligned to the current quarters standards Checkpoint 1 I will assess student progressin October using an assessment developed from Link- it created by our coaching staff and administrators. I-Ready diagnostic data Benchmark Assessment 1 Practice tests Checkpoint 2 I will assess student progress in December using an assessment developed from Link- it by our coaching staff and administrators. Mini Tests Benchmark Assessment 2 Checkpoint 3 I will assess student progressin February using an assessment developed from Link- it by our coaching staff and administrators. ILEAP/PARCC Benchmark Assessment 3 Mini Tests