SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 40
Download to read offline
Team 20
Blair Belliveau
McLean Gordon
Callen Larus
Anand Swamysetti
Yi-Lin Su
Demand for Personal Computers
Agenda
• Computer Industry Trend Analysis
• Hewlett Packard Analysis
• Proposed Variables/Research Process
• Regression Equation
• Forecast
• Recommendations
• Q & A
Computer Industry
Dell: Build-to-Order
Apple: Innovation
Growth of tablets
PC Industry = Car Industry
2013 Computer and Internet
Use for U.S. Households
83.8%
78.5%
63.6%
78.4% 73.4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Total with
Computer
With
Desktop/Laptop
With Handheld
Computer
With Internet
Access
With High Speed
Internet
% Households
Source: Census
U.S. PC Sales
for Hewlett Packard
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
HPSales%ofTotalMarket
SalesinUnits
HP/Compaq Sales HP Sales % Total MarketThousands
Initial Research
Apple Net Sales Revenue
Consumer Personal Savings
CPI: Personal Computers
Consumer Sentiment Index
Multiple Job Holders
Producer Price Index
Real Personal Consumption
Seasonality
Total US School Enrollment
US Internet Advertising Expenditure
Variables Selected
CPI: Personal Computers
Total US School Enrollment
4th Quarter/Seasonality
Regression Model
HP Quantity =
-30604 – 0.261 PC Price
+ 0.4477 Total School
Enrollment + 434 Quarter_4
Explains 85.11% of Demand
Hewlett Packard Sales:
Real versus Predicted
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
HP/CompaqSalesinUnits
HP Predicted Sales (in units) HP Real Sales (in units)
Thousands
Regression: Price
HP Quantity = -30604 – 0.261 PC Price + 0.4477
Total School Enrollment + 434 Quarter_4
Regression:
Student Enrollment
HP Quantity = -30604 – 0.261 PC Price + 0.4477
Total School Enrollment + 434 Quarter_4
Regression: 4th Quarter
HP Quantity = -30604 – 0.261 PC Price + 0.4477
Total School Enrollment + 434 Quarter_4
Hewlett Packard Sales:
Real versus Predicted
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
HP/CompaqSalesinUnits
HP Predicted Sales (in units) HP Real Sales (in units)
Thousands
Dell (Build to Order)
September 11th
Windows 7
PC Price Drops
Key Findings
Computers are a necessary school supply
Holiday season is the biggest sales driver
Customization is the industry norm
Price will always be an important factor
HP PC Demand Prediction
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
DemandPrediction(inunits)
Thousands
Predictions:
US Student Enrollment
68000
70000
72000
74000
76000
78000
80000
TotalUSStudentEnrollment
Source: Census
Thousands
Predictions: Price
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
PriceofPCbasedonCPI
Source: Gartner
Base Period: DECEMBER 2007=100
Recommendations
 Increase production in Q2 in
preparation for Q3 and Q4
 Continue marketing efforts for
Pavilionx2, Envyx2 and Splitx2
 Focus R & D efforts on launching a
product less than $300
 Increase marketing efforts for HP
Academy
Questions?
HP PC Sales vs Dell
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
PCSalesinUnits
Dell Sales HP Sales
Consumer Sentiment Index
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Consumer Sentiment Index
CompoundedAnnualRateofChange
Source: FRED
HP Demand Adjusted
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
19971
3
19981
3
19991
3
20001
3
20011
3
20021
3
20031
3
20041
3
20051
3
20061
3
20071
3
20081
3
20091
3
20101
3
20111
3
20121
3
20131
3
20141
3
20151
3
HPDemand(inunits)
HP sale(real) HP Sales(equation)
US Internet Advertising Expenditure
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
USInternetAddollars
Ad Dollars SpentMillions
Apple Net Sales Growth
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
NetSales(inmillions)
Apple Net Sales (in millions)
Source: Apple Quarterly Reports
Hewlett Packard Split
Source: Hewlett Packard Announcement Investor Presentation
Hewlett Packard Split
Source: Hewlett Packard Announcement Investor Presentation
Hewlett Packard Split
Source: Hewlett Packard Announcement Investor Presentation
Hewlett Packard Split
Source: Hewlett Packard Announcement Investor Presentation
Hewlett Packard Split
Source: Hewlett Packard Announcement Investor Presentation
Competitors
H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 1
Hewlett-Packard Demand Driver Analysis:
Forecast and Course of Action
Blair Belliveau
McLean Gordon
Callen Larus
Yi-Lin Su
Anand Swamysetti
Team 20
Economic Analysis
Section 2
H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 2
Personal Computer Industry Trends:
Since 1997, the personal computer industry has experienced defined pivotal moments.
Beginning in 2000, consumer sentiment shifted as the US market became saturated. Growth
came to a halt and the PC industry had to begin to adapt. As a result, the notebook laptop gained
footing and growth started anew. Dell won the consumer’s desires with Build-to-Order leading
to the industry rebounding (Carlson, 2006). Now the process has halted and innovation has
again become a necessity. Apple has dominated the playing field with its answer to the
consumer’s whims. Apple’s iPad has challenged the industry to focus on highly efficient, mobile
devices (Bajarin T. , Can the PC Industry Resurrect itself?, 2013).
Surveys show that people utilize tablets for 80% of their computational tasks leaving PCs
with the remaining 20% (Bajarin T. , Can the PC Industry Resurrect itself?, 2013). That 20% is
completed with the most baseline models leaving the most expensive PCs on the shelves to
collect dust. To further acknowledge the trend, the past ten years were dominated by the PCs in
the $799-$999 range with “high-end processors, extended graphics capabilities, and more on-
board memory and hard drive space” superior to cheaper models; however, it is those cheaper
models that have become the most preferred (Bajarin T. , Can the PC Industry Resurrect itself?,
2013). The last decade’s mid-priced PC has become marginalized as PCs simply need to meet
simple needs; furthermore, PCs have become like the car industry, nearly every household has
one and tries to make it last (Bajarin B. , 2013). Consumers feel no need to upgrade their PCs
which denotes the decreased value in the PC market. Demand still exists for upscale PCs in the
$1099-$1499 range but only in IT, business, and SMB markets which pale in comparison to the
consumer sector (Bajarin T. , Can the PC Industry Resurrect itself?, 2013).
The dawn of ultramobiles and hybrids illuminate the PC industry’s future. Multirole PCs
are the potential for the industry to regain traction and value in the minds of the consumer sector.
Goals should be set upon a hybrid PC of eight inches and smaller in dimension that meets the
demand of the tablet and has the potential for a traditional computer with the necessary
accessories (Bajarin T. , Windows Blue and the Rise of Ultramobiles, 2013). As for HP, Inc., the
company needs to continue developing hybrid PCs with touch-screen and high computational
capabilities. Price
has become the
leading combatant
contributing to the
PC industry’s
appeal. As evident
in figure 1, the
substantial
percentage of
households with
handheld computers
is a market that
needs to be tapped
(United States
Census Bureau,
Figure 1: Bar graph showing Percentage of Product ownership in US Households
(United States Census Bureau, 2014)
H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 3
2014). Quarter 2 reports, however, show that the tablet market may now be saturated (Pettey &
van der Meulen, 2014). With the potential of a hybrid PC, HP should be able to evolve to
answer the new consumer’s desires.
Key Factors Driving Demand in the Industry:
Team 20 Consulting Services have revealed eight key factors that drive overall demand
for PCs:
CPI: Personal Computers Total School Enrollment US Internet Advertising Expenditure
Real Personal Consumption Multiple Job Holding Persons Consumer Personal Savings
Producer Price Index Seasonality
Evident in the industry trends, the consumer price index of PCs is an indispensable
variable in determining the quantity demanded. The index references the actual value of a 1997
PC which shows a rapid decrease until 2003. Since 2003, the CPI becomes asymptotic
indicating that the value of the PC has stagnated. We anticipate a negative relationship in our
demand analysis.
Total school enrollment should produce a positive contributor to the predicted quantity
demanded. We believed that school enrollment would have a significant effect on the sales of
PCs as most students ultimately purchase the products. According to our conducted survey,
people between the ages of 20-30 years reported school as the most important reason to buy a
laptop.
Under the current worldwide culture, internet is in everyone’s life and we can barely
function without it; therefore, we considered the effect of internet advertising expenditure as a
reflection on the predicted quantity demanded. We expected a positive relationship as
expenditure increased where there should be an increase in product demand.
To further our analysis, we considered recorded trends in real personal consumption. We
anticipated the macro variable would provide a positive relationship to demand. The variable
reflects personal spending per consumer adjusted to inflation further illustrating overall
consumer spending behavior and the overall state of the economy. The higher the real personal
consumption, we would expect higher sales of PCs (Oak, 2012).
Next, we considered multiple job holding persons. We rationalized that a person with
multiple jobs necessitated a PC or two in order to maintain organization. The need for
organization would contribute to more product demand and reflect a positive relationship in our
analysis.
We then considered consumer personal savings. In contrast to the majority of the
variables, we anticipated a negative relationship in demand. This variable reflects the
consumer’s tendency to hold on to old models as they continue to meet their needs. As this
variable increases, it shows consumers are not spending on potential “want” products.
Producer price index reflects the average change over time in selling prices received by
producers for their output. Higher PPI would illustrate a healthier economy flushed with
consumer spending (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2014). We anticipated a positive impact on our
analysis.
H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 4
Lastly, we considered the seasonality. We anticipated certain results depending upon the
time of the year. We rationalized Q3 and Q4 would be important indicators in our analysis as
students ready for the new school year and consumers tend to purchase more for the holidays
respectively.
Quarterly Data and Sources:
I. Consumer Price Index for Personal Computers:
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2014). Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers:
Personal computers and peripheral equipment. Retrieved from FRED:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CUUR0000SEEE01
II. Total School Enrollment:
United States Census Bureau. (2014). School Enrollment. Retrieved from United States Census
Bureau: www.census.gov/hhes/school/index.html
III. US Internet Advertising Expenditure:
Interactive Advertising Bureau. (2014). IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report Conducted by
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC). Retrieved from Interactive Adveristing Bureau:
http://www.iab.net/research/industry_data_and_landscape/adrevenuereport
IV. Real Personal Consumption:
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2014). Personal Consumption Expenditures. Retrieved from
FRED: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PCEC
V. Multiple Job Holding Persons:
Bureau of Labor Statisitics. (2014). Multiple Job Holders. Retrieved from Bureau of Labor
Statistics: http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet
VI. Consumer Personal Savings:
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2014). Personal Savings. Retrieved from FRED:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PSAVE
VII. Producer Price Index:
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2014). Producer Prices Index: Total Goods for the United
States. Retrieved from FRED:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PITGCG01USQ661N
Multiple Variable Regression:
HP Quantity = -30604 – 0.261 PC Price + 0.4477 Total School Enrollment + 434 Quarter_4
The regression equation stated above best reflects the demand for HP PCs. Based on our
survey and our research on overall industry trends, the consumer desire to purchase PCs is
contingent upon the set price, amount of school enrollment, and the regular consumer attitude to
spend during the holiday season.
While consumers may hold on to their PCs and resist the pressure to upgrade, newly
enrolled students will need new PCs to meet school work load demands. By the winter season,
H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 5
individuals who want to spend may seek out a new innovative way to meet their computational
needs. In both situations, however, consumers will still focus on price ranges less than the base
PC priced at $799-$999; furthermore, if a product answers the needs of a PC and the
convenience and portability of a tablet, HP may be able to win over consumers (Bajarin T. , Can
the PC Industry Resurrect itself?, 2013). In light of these results, an innovative PC-tablet hybrid
should sweep the consumer’s minds. The regression explains 85.11% of consumer demand and
highlights the seasonal timetable to introduce the “next best thing.”
The release of the Split x 2 hybrid should meet the consumer’s needs. Starting at $600, it
should facilitate the price conscious consumer while meeting 100% of the consumer’s needs
(Riofrio, 2014). Our model illustrates the times the new innovative models should be released
and which market to focus on. New students will start looking for practical alternatives to meet
convenience and work station needs.
Our key findings incorporate industry trends and our regression analysis. We confirm
that computers are a necessary school supply, the holiday season is the biggest sales driver,
customization has become an industry norm for Windows based PCs, and price will always be a
competitive factor for HP to address.
Forecasts:
Our projections for the Total School Enrollment variable are taken from the National
Center for Education Statistics’ “Projections of Education Statistics to 2022,” published in
February, 2014. This report has been published under the auspices of the U.S. Department of
Education since 1964. The report’s forecasting models are in turn based on assumptions about
population and economic growth, taken from the 2010 Census and from IHS Global Insight.
As seen in Figure 2, the student enrollment statistic’s predictive power comes from its
incorporation of a broad set of macro variables, including forecasts of fertility rate, immigration,
disposable income per capita and unemployment. As William J. Hussar, economist at the NCES,
explained to us, the disposable income variable is expected to have a positive sign, as increased
income increases people’s ability to pay for postsecondary education (Hussar, 2014). The
unemployment variable is expected to have a negative sign, as increased unemployment lowers
the opportunity costs of attending school.
In addition to being a comprehensive macro-indicator, Total School enrollment accounts
for one important driver of PC sales, which is the education sector. As HP states in its Annual
Reports, the education sector is a significant market for its products. As enrollment and school
spending rise, there is increased demand for PCs, which are learning tools for new students and
teachers.
Our 4th
quarter variable is just an indicator, used to account for the fact that HP frequently
shows increased unit shipments during the 4th
quarter. The 4th
quarter is regularly a time of
increased sales for vendors of consumer goods, corresponding with the holiday season in the
United States.
Forecasts for price (see figure 3) (National Center for Education Statistics, 2014)come
from applying the Trend and Season Forecasting Template, found in Complete Business
Statistics, by Aczel Sounderpandian. The price figures show price over time, adjusted for
functionality, with the functionality index year set at 1997. In other words, the drop in price
represents the loss of value of 1997 PC technology. This loss of value is a function of the
H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 6
dramatic improvement of consumer computers. What once was a rare luxury is now
commonplace, as reflected in falling prices. As prices stabilize, approaching the asymptote,
present advances in PC technology reach their limit. Much as the car of today is hardly
differentiated from the car of 2000, the PC of today does not differ significantly from the PC of a
few years ago, at least from the consumer’s standpoint.
Application of Forecasts and Recommendations for Future Business Strategy:
The most obvious recommendation is that inventories should be highest in advance of the
3rd
and 4th
quarters, as this is the period when sales ramp up for the start of the school year and
for the holiday season. Our equation indicates that an additional 434,000 PC units ship during the
4th
quarter, and production should be scheduled accordingly.
The main conclusion of our analysis boils down to the fact that overall demand for the
traditional PC has flattened. Since Q1 2008, the rate of growth from a year prior has been
negative more than half the time. Of the thirty-nine quarters leading up to 2008, only six had
seen a negative rate of growth from a year prior. Additionally, annual growth rate by quarter
since 2008 has been less than one percent. That same rate had averaged at nearly fifteen percent
for the entire decade prior.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
71000 72000 73000 74000 75000 76000 77000 78000 79000 80000
HPPCShipmentsU.S.
Total School Enrollment
HP PC Shipments U.S. vs Total School Enrollment
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
19971
4
3
2
20001
4
3
2
20031
4
3
2
20061
4
3
2
20091
4
3
2
20121
4
3
2
20151
4
PriceofPCbasedonCPI
Price with Forecast
Figure 3: Graph illustrates the CPI for Personal Computers with forecast
Figure 2: Graph illustrates the relationship between PC Shipments and Total School Enrollment
H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 7
Our analysis reflects our realistic outlook for future PC sales. Improving macro
conditions, entailed in our school enrollment variable, do presage a return to mildly increasing
demand. That said, any prediction of a return to the kind of growth commonly seen pre-2008 is
erroneous.
In order to avoid repeating the mistakes of the U.S. automobile industry, HP needs to
recognize that the attainment of increased market share and unit sales in the consumer PC
business would be a Pyrrhic victory. While there will continue to be some demand for new PCs,
which remain necessary tools for the student, the emphasis for the PC buyer will be on reliability
and durability. This is a consequence of the decline in PC innovation and improvement, as
indicated by the flattening of the drop in technology-indexed price. Accordingly, our
recommendation is that HP continue to focus on developing their new product line. At the same
time, HP should work on cost-cutting and distribution optimization, in order to remain
competitive, in this dawn of ultra-mobile and hybrid PC’s.
H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 8
Regression Analysis: HP versus PC $ price, Total School Enrollment total, Quarter_4
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Regression 3 93110539 31036846 125.74 0.000
PC $ price 1 492226 492226 1.99 0.163
Total School Enrollment total 1 27545675 27545675 111.60 0.000
Quarter_4 1 2407272 2407272 9.75 0.003
Error 66 16290422 246825
Total 69 109400960
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
496.814 85.11% 84.43% 83.28%
Coefficients
Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF
Constant -30604 3266 -9.37 0.000
PC $ price -0.261 0.185 -1.41 0.163 2.68
Total School Enrollment total 0.4477 0.0424 10.56 0.000 2.68
Quarter_4 434 139 3.12 0.003 1.01
Regression Equation
HP Quantity = -30604 - 0.261 PC $ price + 0.4477 Total School Enrollment
+ 434 Quater_4
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations
Obs HP Fit Resid Std Resid
1 892 1108 -216 -0.48 X
2 1047 1075 -28 -0.06 X
4 1644 1592 52 0.12 X
20 1385 2442 -1057 -2.23 R
52 5954 4398 1556 3.25 R
60 4138 5189 -1051 -2.25 R
R Large residual X Unusual X
H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 9
800
1300
1800
2300
2800
3300
3800
4300
4800
5300
5800
19971
4
3
2
20001
4
3
2
20031
4
3
2
20061
4
3
2
20091
4
3
2
20121
4
3
2
20151
4
PCQuantityinUnits
HP Sales vs Predicted Sales with Forecast
HP sale(real) HP Sales(equation) Linear (HP sale(real)) Linear (HP Sales(equation))
H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 10
References
Bajarin, B. (2013, April 15). The iPad-Sized Nail in the PC's Coffin. Retrieved from Time:
techland.time.com/2013/04/15/the-ipad-sized-nail-in-the-pcs-coffin/
Bajarin, T. (2013, April 22). Can the PC Industry Resurrect itself? Retrieved from Time:
techland.time.com/2013/04/22/can-the-pc-industry-resurrect-itself/
Bajarin, T. (2013, April 8). Windows Blue and the Rise of Ultramobiles. Retrieved from Time:
techland.time.com/2013/04/08/windows-blue-and-the-rise-of-ultramobiles/
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Producer Price Indexes. Retrieved from Bureau of Labor Statistics:
http://www.bls.gov/ppi
Carlson, P. E. (2006, December). Personal Computer Industry Trends. Retrieved from
www.regionalgrowth.com/pubs/industry-studies/Personal_Computer_Industry_Trends.pdf
Hussar, W. J. (2014, Dec 7). (D. M. Gordon, Interviewer)
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014, February). Projections of Education Statistics to 2022.
Retrieved from National Center for Education Statistics:
http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014051.pdf
Oak, R. (2012, May). Real Personal Consumption Increased 0.1% for May 2012. Retrieved from
Economicpopulist.org: http://www.economicpopulist.org/content/real-personal-consumption-
increased-01-may-2012
Pettey, C., & van der Meulen, R. (2014, July 9). After Two Years of Decline, Worldwide PC Shipments
Experienced Flat Growth in Second Quarter of 2014, According to Gartner. Retrieved from
Gartner: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2793921
Riofrio, M. (2014, June 1). A new crop of HP laptops flip or spin, and run Windows, Chrome, or Android.
Retrieved from PC World: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2304857/hp-lets-loose-with-
laptops-that-rotate-or-split-and-run-windows-chrome-or-android.html
United States Census Bureau. (2014). Computer and Internet Use. Retrieved from United States Census
Bureau: www.census.gov/hhes/computer/

More Related Content

What's hot

Dabur - A Strategic Management Case Study
Dabur - A Strategic Management Case Study Dabur - A Strategic Management Case Study
Dabur - A Strategic Management Case Study sanskriti hagar
 
HP Marketing Management MBA SEM2
HP Marketing Management MBA SEM2HP Marketing Management MBA SEM2
HP Marketing Management MBA SEM2Ashish Jawadekar
 
Cola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case Study
Cola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case StudyCola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case Study
Cola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case StudyMohan Kanni
 
Apple Marketing strategy
Apple Marketing strategyApple Marketing strategy
Apple Marketing strategyParas Gupta
 
Wipro Five forces and Pestel Analysis
Wipro Five forces and Pestel AnalysisWipro Five forces and Pestel Analysis
Wipro Five forces and Pestel AnalysisAbid Siddiqui
 
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HUL
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HULStrategic Business Management Project Report on HUL
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HULSubhashish Mondal
 
Best Presentation About Infosys
Best Presentation About InfosysBest Presentation About Infosys
Best Presentation About InfosysDurgadatta Dash
 
Innovation at Apple
Innovation at AppleInnovation at Apple
Innovation at AppleShweta Singh
 
STRATEGIC PLAN OF INDIAN TOBACCO COMPANY (ITC)
STRATEGIC PLAN OF INDIAN TOBACCO COMPANY (ITC)STRATEGIC PLAN OF INDIAN TOBACCO COMPANY (ITC)
STRATEGIC PLAN OF INDIAN TOBACCO COMPANY (ITC)Utkarsh Bisht
 
Porters five forces model on fmcg
Porters five forces model on fmcgPorters five forces model on fmcg
Porters five forces model on fmcgRameez Ahmed
 
Google inc. case study
Google inc. case studyGoogle inc. case study
Google inc. case studysovanna suos
 
Havells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysis
Havells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysisHavells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysis
Havells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysisIshan Pratik
 

What's hot (20)

Dabur - A Strategic Management Case Study
Dabur - A Strategic Management Case Study Dabur - A Strategic Management Case Study
Dabur - A Strategic Management Case Study
 
Apple case study
Apple case studyApple case study
Apple case study
 
Jio
Jio Jio
Jio
 
Hewlett packard
Hewlett packardHewlett packard
Hewlett packard
 
HP Marketing Management MBA SEM2
HP Marketing Management MBA SEM2HP Marketing Management MBA SEM2
HP Marketing Management MBA SEM2
 
Cola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case Study
Cola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case StudyCola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case Study
Cola Wars - Coke Vs Pepsi Harvard Business School Case Study
 
Reliance jio
Reliance jioReliance jio
Reliance jio
 
Apple Marketing strategy
Apple Marketing strategyApple Marketing strategy
Apple Marketing strategy
 
Wipro Five forces and Pestel Analysis
Wipro Five forces and Pestel AnalysisWipro Five forces and Pestel Analysis
Wipro Five forces and Pestel Analysis
 
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HUL
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HULStrategic Business Management Project Report on HUL
Strategic Business Management Project Report on HUL
 
Best Presentation About Infosys
Best Presentation About InfosysBest Presentation About Infosys
Best Presentation About Infosys
 
Hp final ppt
Hp final pptHp final ppt
Hp final ppt
 
Innovation at Apple
Innovation at AppleInnovation at Apple
Innovation at Apple
 
STRATEGIC PLAN OF INDIAN TOBACCO COMPANY (ITC)
STRATEGIC PLAN OF INDIAN TOBACCO COMPANY (ITC)STRATEGIC PLAN OF INDIAN TOBACCO COMPANY (ITC)
STRATEGIC PLAN OF INDIAN TOBACCO COMPANY (ITC)
 
Porters five forces model on fmcg
Porters five forces model on fmcgPorters five forces model on fmcg
Porters five forces model on fmcg
 
nescafe vs bru
nescafe vs brunescafe vs bru
nescafe vs bru
 
vodafone, aritel, jio
vodafone, aritel, jiovodafone, aritel, jio
vodafone, aritel, jio
 
AJANTA PACKAGING.pptx
AJANTA PACKAGING.pptxAJANTA PACKAGING.pptx
AJANTA PACKAGING.pptx
 
Google inc. case study
Google inc. case studyGoogle inc. case study
Google inc. case study
 
Havells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysis
Havells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysisHavells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysis
Havells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysis
 

Viewers also liked

q_ag_touchmixmusiciansandbands
q_ag_touchmixmusiciansandbandsq_ag_touchmixmusiciansandbands
q_ag_touchmixmusiciansandbandsBob Lee
 
PLD_app_guide_Production_B
PLD_app_guide_Production_BPLD_app_guide_Production_B
PLD_app_guide_Production_BBob Lee
 
2015교육센터매뉴얼(관리자용)
2015교육센터매뉴얼(관리자용)2015교육센터매뉴얼(관리자용)
2015교육센터매뉴얼(관리자용)eunkorea
 
호스피스간호교육
호스피스간호교육호스피스간호교육
호스피스간호교육eunkorea
 
검사실교육자료 2014
검사실교육자료 2014검사실교육자료 2014
검사실교육자료 2014eunkorea
 

Viewers also liked (9)

q_ag_touchmixmusiciansandbands
q_ag_touchmixmusiciansandbandsq_ag_touchmixmusiciansandbands
q_ag_touchmixmusiciansandbands
 
PLD_app_guide_Production_B
PLD_app_guide_Production_BPLD_app_guide_Production_B
PLD_app_guide_Production_B
 
Cv marc 010616
Cv marc 010616Cv marc 010616
Cv marc 010616
 
2015교육센터매뉴얼(관리자용)
2015교육센터매뉴얼(관리자용)2015교육센터매뉴얼(관리자용)
2015교육센터매뉴얼(관리자용)
 
호스피스간호교육
호스피스간호교육호스피스간호교육
호스피스간호교육
 
Eaton PPT Group 3 Thundercats
Eaton PPT Group 3 ThundercatsEaton PPT Group 3 Thundercats
Eaton PPT Group 3 Thundercats
 
Cumberland Metals
Cumberland MetalsCumberland Metals
Cumberland Metals
 
검사실교육자료 2014
검사실교육자료 2014검사실교육자료 2014
검사실교육자료 2014
 
Pre sales ppt
Pre sales pptPre sales ppt
Pre sales ppt
 

Similar to HP Sales Presentation

Major reasons for the persistently low average profitability (return on sales...
Major reasons for the persistently low average profitability (return on sales...Major reasons for the persistently low average profitability (return on sales...
Major reasons for the persistently low average profitability (return on sales...Alexander Georgi
 
CRDA Vancouver 2000 presentation
CRDA Vancouver 2000 presentationCRDA Vancouver 2000 presentation
CRDA Vancouver 2000 presentationWilliam J. Brown
 
Emerging Technology, Shiny Objects & The Future of Media - iSummit - Fred Steube
Emerging Technology, Shiny Objects & The Future of Media - iSummit - Fred SteubeEmerging Technology, Shiny Objects & The Future of Media - iSummit - Fred Steube
Emerging Technology, Shiny Objects & The Future of Media - iSummit - Fred SteubeFred Steube
 
The Golden Age of Wearables:
 Personal Networks, Smart Things & Intimate Know...
The Golden Age of Wearables:
 Personal Networks, Smart Things & Intimate Know...The Golden Age of Wearables:
 Personal Networks, Smart Things & Intimate Know...
The Golden Age of Wearables:
 Personal Networks, Smart Things & Intimate Know...Paul Brody
 
Knowledge sharing-april252011
Knowledge sharing-april252011Knowledge sharing-april252011
Knowledge sharing-april252011Kamal Kannan
 
[Fórum 2020 - Global Edition] Dados e Al - A galinha dos ovos de ouro no E-Co...
[Fórum 2020 - Global Edition] Dados e Al - A galinha dos ovos de ouro no E-Co...[Fórum 2020 - Global Edition] Dados e Al - A galinha dos ovos de ouro no E-Co...
[Fórum 2020 - Global Edition] Dados e Al - A galinha dos ovos de ouro no E-Co...E-Commerce Brasil
 
2014 Key trends
2014 Key trends2014 Key trends
2014 Key trendsSean Cho
 
WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR BUSINESS1WEEK 3 ASSIGN.docx
WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR BUSINESS1WEEK 3 ASSIGN.docxWEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR BUSINESS1WEEK 3 ASSIGN.docx
WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR BUSINESS1WEEK 3 ASSIGN.docxjessiehampson
 
Internet trends report 2018
Internet trends report 2018 Internet trends report 2018
Internet trends report 2018 Steve Silver
 
Mary Meeker Internet Trends Report 2018
Mary Meeker Internet Trends Report 2018Mary Meeker Internet Trends Report 2018
Mary Meeker Internet Trends Report 2018Harsha MV
 
Global Internet trends-report-2018
Global Internet trends-report-2018Global Internet trends-report-2018
Global Internet trends-report-2018Paulo Ratinecas
 
Internet Trends Report 2018 - KPCB - Mary Meeker - #CodeCon
Internet Trends Report 2018 - KPCB - Mary Meeker - #CodeConInternet Trends Report 2018 - KPCB - Mary Meeker - #CodeCon
Internet Trends Report 2018 - KPCB - Mary Meeker - #CodeConIan Gertler
 
Internet trends report June 2018
Internet trends report June 2018Internet trends report June 2018
Internet trends report June 2018Peter Cockcroft
 
Mary meeker internettrendsreport2018 180530164809
Mary meeker internettrendsreport2018 180530164809Mary meeker internettrendsreport2018 180530164809
Mary meeker internettrendsreport2018 180530164809Raj Narayanan
 
TechCrunch - Mary Meeker 2018 Internet Trends Report
TechCrunch - Mary Meeker 2018 Internet Trends ReportTechCrunch - Mary Meeker 2018 Internet Trends Report
TechCrunch - Mary Meeker 2018 Internet Trends ReportYoungUk Seung
 
Mary Meeker Internet trends report_2018
Mary Meeker Internet trends report_2018Mary Meeker Internet trends report_2018
Mary Meeker Internet trends report_2018WesleyMann2
 
GlobalresearchEssays
GlobalresearchEssaysGlobalresearchEssays
GlobalresearchEssaysAleks Kell
 

Similar to HP Sales Presentation (20)

Major reasons for the persistently low average profitability (return on sales...
Major reasons for the persistently low average profitability (return on sales...Major reasons for the persistently low average profitability (return on sales...
Major reasons for the persistently low average profitability (return on sales...
 
CRDA Vancouver 2000 presentation
CRDA Vancouver 2000 presentationCRDA Vancouver 2000 presentation
CRDA Vancouver 2000 presentation
 
Emerging Technology, Shiny Objects & The Future of Media - iSummit - Fred Steube
Emerging Technology, Shiny Objects & The Future of Media - iSummit - Fred SteubeEmerging Technology, Shiny Objects & The Future of Media - iSummit - Fred Steube
Emerging Technology, Shiny Objects & The Future of Media - iSummit - Fred Steube
 
The Golden Age of Wearables:
 Personal Networks, Smart Things & Intimate Know...
The Golden Age of Wearables:
 Personal Networks, Smart Things & Intimate Know...The Golden Age of Wearables:
 Personal Networks, Smart Things & Intimate Know...
The Golden Age of Wearables:
 Personal Networks, Smart Things & Intimate Know...
 
Knowledge sharing-april252011
Knowledge sharing-april252011Knowledge sharing-april252011
Knowledge sharing-april252011
 
[Fórum 2020 - Global Edition] Dados e Al - A galinha dos ovos de ouro no E-Co...
[Fórum 2020 - Global Edition] Dados e Al - A galinha dos ovos de ouro no E-Co...[Fórum 2020 - Global Edition] Dados e Al - A galinha dos ovos de ouro no E-Co...
[Fórum 2020 - Global Edition] Dados e Al - A galinha dos ovos de ouro no E-Co...
 
Laptop
LaptopLaptop
Laptop
 
2014 Key trends
2014 Key trends2014 Key trends
2014 Key trends
 
WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR BUSINESS1WEEK 3 ASSIGN.docx
WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR BUSINESS1WEEK 3 ASSIGN.docxWEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR BUSINESS1WEEK 3 ASSIGN.docx
WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT RESEARCH ANALYSIS FOR BUSINESS1WEEK 3 ASSIGN.docx
 
Internet trends report 2018
Internet trends report 2018 Internet trends report 2018
Internet trends report 2018
 
Mary Meeker Internet Trends Report 2018
Mary Meeker Internet Trends Report 2018Mary Meeker Internet Trends Report 2018
Mary Meeker Internet Trends Report 2018
 
Global Internet trends-report-2018
Global Internet trends-report-2018Global Internet trends-report-2018
Global Internet trends-report-2018
 
Internet trends report_2018
Internet trends report_2018Internet trends report_2018
Internet trends report_2018
 
Internet Trends Report 2018 - KPCB - Mary Meeker - #CodeCon
Internet Trends Report 2018 - KPCB - Mary Meeker - #CodeConInternet Trends Report 2018 - KPCB - Mary Meeker - #CodeCon
Internet Trends Report 2018 - KPCB - Mary Meeker - #CodeCon
 
Internet trends report June 2018
Internet trends report June 2018Internet trends report June 2018
Internet trends report June 2018
 
Mary meeker internettrendsreport2018 180530164809
Mary meeker internettrendsreport2018 180530164809Mary meeker internettrendsreport2018 180530164809
Mary meeker internettrendsreport2018 180530164809
 
TechCrunch - Mary Meeker 2018 Internet Trends Report
TechCrunch - Mary Meeker 2018 Internet Trends ReportTechCrunch - Mary Meeker 2018 Internet Trends Report
TechCrunch - Mary Meeker 2018 Internet Trends Report
 
Internet trends report 2018
Internet trends report 2018Internet trends report 2018
Internet trends report 2018
 
Mary Meeker Internet trends report_2018
Mary Meeker Internet trends report_2018Mary Meeker Internet trends report_2018
Mary Meeker Internet trends report_2018
 
GlobalresearchEssays
GlobalresearchEssaysGlobalresearchEssays
GlobalresearchEssays
 

HP Sales Presentation

  • 1. Team 20 Blair Belliveau McLean Gordon Callen Larus Anand Swamysetti Yi-Lin Su Demand for Personal Computers
  • 2. Agenda • Computer Industry Trend Analysis • Hewlett Packard Analysis • Proposed Variables/Research Process • Regression Equation • Forecast • Recommendations • Q & A
  • 3. Computer Industry Dell: Build-to-Order Apple: Innovation Growth of tablets PC Industry = Car Industry
  • 4. 2013 Computer and Internet Use for U.S. Households 83.8% 78.5% 63.6% 78.4% 73.4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Total with Computer With Desktop/Laptop With Handheld Computer With Internet Access With High Speed Internet % Households Source: Census
  • 5. U.S. PC Sales for Hewlett Packard 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 HPSales%ofTotalMarket SalesinUnits HP/Compaq Sales HP Sales % Total MarketThousands
  • 6. Initial Research Apple Net Sales Revenue Consumer Personal Savings CPI: Personal Computers Consumer Sentiment Index Multiple Job Holders Producer Price Index Real Personal Consumption Seasonality Total US School Enrollment US Internet Advertising Expenditure
  • 7. Variables Selected CPI: Personal Computers Total US School Enrollment 4th Quarter/Seasonality
  • 8. Regression Model HP Quantity = -30604 – 0.261 PC Price + 0.4477 Total School Enrollment + 434 Quarter_4 Explains 85.11% of Demand
  • 9. Hewlett Packard Sales: Real versus Predicted 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 HP/CompaqSalesinUnits HP Predicted Sales (in units) HP Real Sales (in units) Thousands
  • 10. Regression: Price HP Quantity = -30604 – 0.261 PC Price + 0.4477 Total School Enrollment + 434 Quarter_4
  • 11. Regression: Student Enrollment HP Quantity = -30604 – 0.261 PC Price + 0.4477 Total School Enrollment + 434 Quarter_4
  • 12. Regression: 4th Quarter HP Quantity = -30604 – 0.261 PC Price + 0.4477 Total School Enrollment + 434 Quarter_4
  • 13. Hewlett Packard Sales: Real versus Predicted 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 HP/CompaqSalesinUnits HP Predicted Sales (in units) HP Real Sales (in units) Thousands Dell (Build to Order) September 11th Windows 7 PC Price Drops
  • 14. Key Findings Computers are a necessary school supply Holiday season is the biggest sales driver Customization is the industry norm Price will always be an important factor
  • 15. HP PC Demand Prediction 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 DemandPrediction(inunits) Thousands
  • 18. Recommendations  Increase production in Q2 in preparation for Q3 and Q4  Continue marketing efforts for Pavilionx2, Envyx2 and Splitx2  Focus R & D efforts on launching a product less than $300  Increase marketing efforts for HP Academy
  • 20. HP PC Sales vs Dell 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 PCSalesinUnits Dell Sales HP Sales
  • 21. Consumer Sentiment Index -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 Consumer Sentiment Index CompoundedAnnualRateofChange Source: FRED
  • 23. US Internet Advertising Expenditure 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 USInternetAddollars Ad Dollars SpentMillions
  • 24. Apple Net Sales Growth 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 NetSales(inmillions) Apple Net Sales (in millions) Source: Apple Quarterly Reports
  • 25. Hewlett Packard Split Source: Hewlett Packard Announcement Investor Presentation
  • 26. Hewlett Packard Split Source: Hewlett Packard Announcement Investor Presentation
  • 27. Hewlett Packard Split Source: Hewlett Packard Announcement Investor Presentation
  • 28. Hewlett Packard Split Source: Hewlett Packard Announcement Investor Presentation
  • 29. Hewlett Packard Split Source: Hewlett Packard Announcement Investor Presentation
  • 31. H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 1 Hewlett-Packard Demand Driver Analysis: Forecast and Course of Action Blair Belliveau McLean Gordon Callen Larus Yi-Lin Su Anand Swamysetti Team 20 Economic Analysis Section 2
  • 32. H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 2 Personal Computer Industry Trends: Since 1997, the personal computer industry has experienced defined pivotal moments. Beginning in 2000, consumer sentiment shifted as the US market became saturated. Growth came to a halt and the PC industry had to begin to adapt. As a result, the notebook laptop gained footing and growth started anew. Dell won the consumer’s desires with Build-to-Order leading to the industry rebounding (Carlson, 2006). Now the process has halted and innovation has again become a necessity. Apple has dominated the playing field with its answer to the consumer’s whims. Apple’s iPad has challenged the industry to focus on highly efficient, mobile devices (Bajarin T. , Can the PC Industry Resurrect itself?, 2013). Surveys show that people utilize tablets for 80% of their computational tasks leaving PCs with the remaining 20% (Bajarin T. , Can the PC Industry Resurrect itself?, 2013). That 20% is completed with the most baseline models leaving the most expensive PCs on the shelves to collect dust. To further acknowledge the trend, the past ten years were dominated by the PCs in the $799-$999 range with “high-end processors, extended graphics capabilities, and more on- board memory and hard drive space” superior to cheaper models; however, it is those cheaper models that have become the most preferred (Bajarin T. , Can the PC Industry Resurrect itself?, 2013). The last decade’s mid-priced PC has become marginalized as PCs simply need to meet simple needs; furthermore, PCs have become like the car industry, nearly every household has one and tries to make it last (Bajarin B. , 2013). Consumers feel no need to upgrade their PCs which denotes the decreased value in the PC market. Demand still exists for upscale PCs in the $1099-$1499 range but only in IT, business, and SMB markets which pale in comparison to the consumer sector (Bajarin T. , Can the PC Industry Resurrect itself?, 2013). The dawn of ultramobiles and hybrids illuminate the PC industry’s future. Multirole PCs are the potential for the industry to regain traction and value in the minds of the consumer sector. Goals should be set upon a hybrid PC of eight inches and smaller in dimension that meets the demand of the tablet and has the potential for a traditional computer with the necessary accessories (Bajarin T. , Windows Blue and the Rise of Ultramobiles, 2013). As for HP, Inc., the company needs to continue developing hybrid PCs with touch-screen and high computational capabilities. Price has become the leading combatant contributing to the PC industry’s appeal. As evident in figure 1, the substantial percentage of households with handheld computers is a market that needs to be tapped (United States Census Bureau, Figure 1: Bar graph showing Percentage of Product ownership in US Households (United States Census Bureau, 2014)
  • 33. H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 3 2014). Quarter 2 reports, however, show that the tablet market may now be saturated (Pettey & van der Meulen, 2014). With the potential of a hybrid PC, HP should be able to evolve to answer the new consumer’s desires. Key Factors Driving Demand in the Industry: Team 20 Consulting Services have revealed eight key factors that drive overall demand for PCs: CPI: Personal Computers Total School Enrollment US Internet Advertising Expenditure Real Personal Consumption Multiple Job Holding Persons Consumer Personal Savings Producer Price Index Seasonality Evident in the industry trends, the consumer price index of PCs is an indispensable variable in determining the quantity demanded. The index references the actual value of a 1997 PC which shows a rapid decrease until 2003. Since 2003, the CPI becomes asymptotic indicating that the value of the PC has stagnated. We anticipate a negative relationship in our demand analysis. Total school enrollment should produce a positive contributor to the predicted quantity demanded. We believed that school enrollment would have a significant effect on the sales of PCs as most students ultimately purchase the products. According to our conducted survey, people between the ages of 20-30 years reported school as the most important reason to buy a laptop. Under the current worldwide culture, internet is in everyone’s life and we can barely function without it; therefore, we considered the effect of internet advertising expenditure as a reflection on the predicted quantity demanded. We expected a positive relationship as expenditure increased where there should be an increase in product demand. To further our analysis, we considered recorded trends in real personal consumption. We anticipated the macro variable would provide a positive relationship to demand. The variable reflects personal spending per consumer adjusted to inflation further illustrating overall consumer spending behavior and the overall state of the economy. The higher the real personal consumption, we would expect higher sales of PCs (Oak, 2012). Next, we considered multiple job holding persons. We rationalized that a person with multiple jobs necessitated a PC or two in order to maintain organization. The need for organization would contribute to more product demand and reflect a positive relationship in our analysis. We then considered consumer personal savings. In contrast to the majority of the variables, we anticipated a negative relationship in demand. This variable reflects the consumer’s tendency to hold on to old models as they continue to meet their needs. As this variable increases, it shows consumers are not spending on potential “want” products. Producer price index reflects the average change over time in selling prices received by producers for their output. Higher PPI would illustrate a healthier economy flushed with consumer spending (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2014). We anticipated a positive impact on our analysis.
  • 34. H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 4 Lastly, we considered the seasonality. We anticipated certain results depending upon the time of the year. We rationalized Q3 and Q4 would be important indicators in our analysis as students ready for the new school year and consumers tend to purchase more for the holidays respectively. Quarterly Data and Sources: I. Consumer Price Index for Personal Computers: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2014). Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Personal computers and peripheral equipment. Retrieved from FRED: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CUUR0000SEEE01 II. Total School Enrollment: United States Census Bureau. (2014). School Enrollment. Retrieved from United States Census Bureau: www.census.gov/hhes/school/index.html III. US Internet Advertising Expenditure: Interactive Advertising Bureau. (2014). IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report Conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC). Retrieved from Interactive Adveristing Bureau: http://www.iab.net/research/industry_data_and_landscape/adrevenuereport IV. Real Personal Consumption: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2014). Personal Consumption Expenditures. Retrieved from FRED: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PCEC V. Multiple Job Holding Persons: Bureau of Labor Statisitics. (2014). Multiple Job Holders. Retrieved from Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet VI. Consumer Personal Savings: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2014). Personal Savings. Retrieved from FRED: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PSAVE VII. Producer Price Index: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (2014). Producer Prices Index: Total Goods for the United States. Retrieved from FRED: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/PITGCG01USQ661N Multiple Variable Regression: HP Quantity = -30604 – 0.261 PC Price + 0.4477 Total School Enrollment + 434 Quarter_4 The regression equation stated above best reflects the demand for HP PCs. Based on our survey and our research on overall industry trends, the consumer desire to purchase PCs is contingent upon the set price, amount of school enrollment, and the regular consumer attitude to spend during the holiday season. While consumers may hold on to their PCs and resist the pressure to upgrade, newly enrolled students will need new PCs to meet school work load demands. By the winter season,
  • 35. H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 5 individuals who want to spend may seek out a new innovative way to meet their computational needs. In both situations, however, consumers will still focus on price ranges less than the base PC priced at $799-$999; furthermore, if a product answers the needs of a PC and the convenience and portability of a tablet, HP may be able to win over consumers (Bajarin T. , Can the PC Industry Resurrect itself?, 2013). In light of these results, an innovative PC-tablet hybrid should sweep the consumer’s minds. The regression explains 85.11% of consumer demand and highlights the seasonal timetable to introduce the “next best thing.” The release of the Split x 2 hybrid should meet the consumer’s needs. Starting at $600, it should facilitate the price conscious consumer while meeting 100% of the consumer’s needs (Riofrio, 2014). Our model illustrates the times the new innovative models should be released and which market to focus on. New students will start looking for practical alternatives to meet convenience and work station needs. Our key findings incorporate industry trends and our regression analysis. We confirm that computers are a necessary school supply, the holiday season is the biggest sales driver, customization has become an industry norm for Windows based PCs, and price will always be a competitive factor for HP to address. Forecasts: Our projections for the Total School Enrollment variable are taken from the National Center for Education Statistics’ “Projections of Education Statistics to 2022,” published in February, 2014. This report has been published under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Education since 1964. The report’s forecasting models are in turn based on assumptions about population and economic growth, taken from the 2010 Census and from IHS Global Insight. As seen in Figure 2, the student enrollment statistic’s predictive power comes from its incorporation of a broad set of macro variables, including forecasts of fertility rate, immigration, disposable income per capita and unemployment. As William J. Hussar, economist at the NCES, explained to us, the disposable income variable is expected to have a positive sign, as increased income increases people’s ability to pay for postsecondary education (Hussar, 2014). The unemployment variable is expected to have a negative sign, as increased unemployment lowers the opportunity costs of attending school. In addition to being a comprehensive macro-indicator, Total School enrollment accounts for one important driver of PC sales, which is the education sector. As HP states in its Annual Reports, the education sector is a significant market for its products. As enrollment and school spending rise, there is increased demand for PCs, which are learning tools for new students and teachers. Our 4th quarter variable is just an indicator, used to account for the fact that HP frequently shows increased unit shipments during the 4th quarter. The 4th quarter is regularly a time of increased sales for vendors of consumer goods, corresponding with the holiday season in the United States. Forecasts for price (see figure 3) (National Center for Education Statistics, 2014)come from applying the Trend and Season Forecasting Template, found in Complete Business Statistics, by Aczel Sounderpandian. The price figures show price over time, adjusted for functionality, with the functionality index year set at 1997. In other words, the drop in price represents the loss of value of 1997 PC technology. This loss of value is a function of the
  • 36. H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 6 dramatic improvement of consumer computers. What once was a rare luxury is now commonplace, as reflected in falling prices. As prices stabilize, approaching the asymptote, present advances in PC technology reach their limit. Much as the car of today is hardly differentiated from the car of 2000, the PC of today does not differ significantly from the PC of a few years ago, at least from the consumer’s standpoint. Application of Forecasts and Recommendations for Future Business Strategy: The most obvious recommendation is that inventories should be highest in advance of the 3rd and 4th quarters, as this is the period when sales ramp up for the start of the school year and for the holiday season. Our equation indicates that an additional 434,000 PC units ship during the 4th quarter, and production should be scheduled accordingly. The main conclusion of our analysis boils down to the fact that overall demand for the traditional PC has flattened. Since Q1 2008, the rate of growth from a year prior has been negative more than half the time. Of the thirty-nine quarters leading up to 2008, only six had seen a negative rate of growth from a year prior. Additionally, annual growth rate by quarter since 2008 has been less than one percent. That same rate had averaged at nearly fifteen percent for the entire decade prior. 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 71000 72000 73000 74000 75000 76000 77000 78000 79000 80000 HPPCShipmentsU.S. Total School Enrollment HP PC Shipments U.S. vs Total School Enrollment 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 19971 4 3 2 20001 4 3 2 20031 4 3 2 20061 4 3 2 20091 4 3 2 20121 4 3 2 20151 4 PriceofPCbasedonCPI Price with Forecast Figure 3: Graph illustrates the CPI for Personal Computers with forecast Figure 2: Graph illustrates the relationship between PC Shipments and Total School Enrollment
  • 37. H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 7 Our analysis reflects our realistic outlook for future PC sales. Improving macro conditions, entailed in our school enrollment variable, do presage a return to mildly increasing demand. That said, any prediction of a return to the kind of growth commonly seen pre-2008 is erroneous. In order to avoid repeating the mistakes of the U.S. automobile industry, HP needs to recognize that the attainment of increased market share and unit sales in the consumer PC business would be a Pyrrhic victory. While there will continue to be some demand for new PCs, which remain necessary tools for the student, the emphasis for the PC buyer will be on reliability and durability. This is a consequence of the decline in PC innovation and improvement, as indicated by the flattening of the drop in technology-indexed price. Accordingly, our recommendation is that HP continue to focus on developing their new product line. At the same time, HP should work on cost-cutting and distribution optimization, in order to remain competitive, in this dawn of ultra-mobile and hybrid PC’s.
  • 38. H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 8 Regression Analysis: HP versus PC $ price, Total School Enrollment total, Quarter_4 Analysis of Variance Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value Regression 3 93110539 31036846 125.74 0.000 PC $ price 1 492226 492226 1.99 0.163 Total School Enrollment total 1 27545675 27545675 111.60 0.000 Quarter_4 1 2407272 2407272 9.75 0.003 Error 66 16290422 246825 Total 69 109400960 Model Summary S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred) 496.814 85.11% 84.43% 83.28% Coefficients Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF Constant -30604 3266 -9.37 0.000 PC $ price -0.261 0.185 -1.41 0.163 2.68 Total School Enrollment total 0.4477 0.0424 10.56 0.000 2.68 Quarter_4 434 139 3.12 0.003 1.01 Regression Equation HP Quantity = -30604 - 0.261 PC $ price + 0.4477 Total School Enrollment + 434 Quater_4 Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations Obs HP Fit Resid Std Resid 1 892 1108 -216 -0.48 X 2 1047 1075 -28 -0.06 X 4 1644 1592 52 0.12 X 20 1385 2442 -1057 -2.23 R 52 5954 4398 1556 3.25 R 60 4138 5189 -1051 -2.25 R R Large residual X Unusual X
  • 39. H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 9 800 1300 1800 2300 2800 3300 3800 4300 4800 5300 5800 19971 4 3 2 20001 4 3 2 20031 4 3 2 20061 4 3 2 20091 4 3 2 20121 4 3 2 20151 4 PCQuantityinUnits HP Sales vs Predicted Sales with Forecast HP sale(real) HP Sales(equation) Linear (HP sale(real)) Linear (HP Sales(equation))
  • 40. H e w l e t t - P a c k a r d D e m a n d D r i v e r A n a l y s i s | 10 References Bajarin, B. (2013, April 15). The iPad-Sized Nail in the PC's Coffin. Retrieved from Time: techland.time.com/2013/04/15/the-ipad-sized-nail-in-the-pcs-coffin/ Bajarin, T. (2013, April 22). Can the PC Industry Resurrect itself? Retrieved from Time: techland.time.com/2013/04/22/can-the-pc-industry-resurrect-itself/ Bajarin, T. (2013, April 8). Windows Blue and the Rise of Ultramobiles. Retrieved from Time: techland.time.com/2013/04/08/windows-blue-and-the-rise-of-ultramobiles/ Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Producer Price Indexes. Retrieved from Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ppi Carlson, P. E. (2006, December). Personal Computer Industry Trends. Retrieved from www.regionalgrowth.com/pubs/industry-studies/Personal_Computer_Industry_Trends.pdf Hussar, W. J. (2014, Dec 7). (D. M. Gordon, Interviewer) National Center for Education Statistics. (2014, February). Projections of Education Statistics to 2022. Retrieved from National Center for Education Statistics: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014051.pdf Oak, R. (2012, May). Real Personal Consumption Increased 0.1% for May 2012. Retrieved from Economicpopulist.org: http://www.economicpopulist.org/content/real-personal-consumption- increased-01-may-2012 Pettey, C., & van der Meulen, R. (2014, July 9). After Two Years of Decline, Worldwide PC Shipments Experienced Flat Growth in Second Quarter of 2014, According to Gartner. Retrieved from Gartner: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2793921 Riofrio, M. (2014, June 1). A new crop of HP laptops flip or spin, and run Windows, Chrome, or Android. Retrieved from PC World: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2304857/hp-lets-loose-with- laptops-that-rotate-or-split-and-run-windows-chrome-or-android.html United States Census Bureau. (2014). Computer and Internet Use. Retrieved from United States Census Bureau: www.census.gov/hhes/computer/