5. Tech Gap?
City
• Cities are more then ever
multilayered, challenged by
budget cuts, stagnation urban
construction projects
• Old procurement structures
(vendor lock)
• General risk averse
Citizens
• 24 hours connected
• Changing needs: craving for
immediate feed-back from city
• Want to leverage on the rapid
development of Internet tech
and social media
6. …cities are incredibly
challenged
• Are reaching their limits for finding new solutions,
generate new projects
• Citizens wants more transparency, innovation
• “Cognitive Surplus’ of the crowd to collaborate on
urban solutions is still untapped
11. How can City Governance
address the tech gap, while
enhancing transparency and
fostering innovation?
12. • Open Innovation we can tackle some of the urban
challenges and shorten up innovation incubation time
• With Open DATA
• With Crowdsourcing
• With Urban Challenges
• With Crowdfunding
• With Social Innovation
16. Open
Innovation
Urban Labs
Grassroot Innovation
Working with
challlenges,
incentives
Crowdsourcing
Hackathons-
Engaging App
Industry
Open Data
Program –
Release of Data
(API’s)
Activities
Working with
commons
Gov
Business
Crowdfunding
17. Amsterdam Open Innovation
Team • Local Enablers (ICT /
Economic Affairs)
• 5 employees, part time
involved
• Agile
• No structural local
resources allocated
• 3 years evolution
process (2010-1013)
28. Learning's so far
• Choose a politically less risky question
• Engage local leadership to commit on high level- kick off
• Use incentives that are tailor made to the target group
• As a government be not anonymous but use avatars, names
• Comment on each idea’s
• Reward the best contributors weekly
• Keep platform with social media activation active
• Mediate between crowds and problem owner
• Try to save up development costs of platforms by reuse of
existing codes
29. 5. How to make Open
Innovation policy
locally?
30. Policy Making Paradox
• Open Innovation is an emerging new policy area
with economic impact
• City governance is more risk-averse and there is a
need for proof of evidences/ business cases to lobby
and convince
• Local ownership creation for O.I is difficult because
it impacts more departments (ICT, Economy, Citizen
Services ) -> need for demonstrators
31. Amsterdam – City Lobby
with Code for America Fellow Joel Mahoney and Henk de
Jong , General Secretary of Amsterdam
32. Economic Relevance
• Open Innovation fuels the city innovation process
• Start Up Acceleration
• Working towards a Civic Apps Store/ Commons
• Access to the most innovative technological solutions and
civic apps
• Ecosystem of cities, app developers, innovation agencies
strong USP for investors
• Scalable solutions among cities (efficiency)
• Reusing instead of reinventing
33. The future
• Launching an Open Innovation Policy Doc’s
Repository for cities with best practices, business cases,
performance matrix
• Build a clear link with Digital Agenda
Link with Smart Cities and Communities Stakholders
Group, and City Protocol
• Network of Civic Innovators on Civic Commons
36. Conclusion
• Open Innovation should be integrated city governance
• EU projects as bottom up demonstrators for local
top down policy making
• Governments are responsible for O.I (big data owner,
public service provider, purchaser)
• Biggest challenge: Open Innovation embedding in regular
governance and share these learning's among cities