Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Chapter 3 Service.pptx

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Nächste SlideShare
Service Purchase Model.pptx
Service Purchase Model.pptx
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 24 Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Chapter 3 Service.pptx (20)

Anzeige

Aktuellste (20)

Chapter 3 Service.pptx

  1. 1. Customer Expectations: are believes about service delivery that serve as a standard or reference point against which performance is judged. Why:- Because customers compare their perceptions of performance with these reference points when evaluating service quality. Therefore, knowledge about customer expectation is critical to service marketers.
  2. 2.  Knowing what customer expects is the first and possibly most critical step in delivering quality service. - Being wrong about what customer want can mean:  Losing a customers business when another company lifts the target exactly  Also mean expending money, time and other resource on things that do not count to the customer
  3. 3.  For the purpose of our discussion, we focus on two type of services: 1. Desired service 2. Adequate service Desired service (Ideal service level)  It is the highest level  It is level of services the customer hops to receive the “wished for” level of performance
  4. 4. Eg:- You will engage the service of your college’s placement office when you are ready to graduate.  What are your expectation of the service?  In all likely hood you want the office to find you job the right job in the right place for the right salary because that is what you hope and wish for Adequate Service  It is the minimum level of service the consumer will tolerate and accept with out being dissatisfied .
  5. 5.  Eg. However, you probably see that the economy may constraint the availability of ideal job opening in companies.  And not all companies you may be interested in having a relationship with your placement office.  In this situation and in general, customers hope to achieve their service desires but recognize that this is not possible.  We call the threshold level of acceptable service adequate service the level of service the customer will accept  Some graduates accepted any job for which
  6. 6.  They earn a salary  Other agree to non- paying short term position as interns to gain experience.  It represents the “minimum tolerable expectant” the bottom level of performance acceptable to the customer.  The Zone of Tolerance  Services are heterogeneous in that performance may vary across providers, across employees from the some provider and even with the same service employee.
  7. 7.  The extent to which customers recognize and are willing to accept this variation is called the zone of tolerance.  If Service drop below adequate service- customers will be frustrated and their satisfaction with the company will be undermined.  If service performance is higher than zone of tolerance at the top end where performance exceeds the desired service – consumes will be very pleased and probably quite surprised as well.  You might consider the ZOT as the range or window in which customers do not particularly notice service performance.
  8. 8.  When it falls outside the range (either very low or very high) the service get the customers attention in either a positive or negative way.  E.g. Consider the service at a check out line in a grocery store.  Customer consider an acceptable time for this service encounter 5 to 10 minutes  If 2 or 3 minute- they may notice the service is excellent  If it is 15 minute- they may grumble and look at their watch.
  9. 9.  3.1.2 Factors that influence customer expectation of service  Because expectation ply such a critical role in customer evaluation of service, marketers need and want to understand the factors that shape them. Source of desired service expectation  Personal needs: those states or conditions essential to the physical or psychological wel- being of the customer, are pivotal factors that shape what customers desire in the service.  E.g A fan who regularly goes to baseball games right from work, and is therefore thirsty food and drink vendors will pass by his section frequently, where as a fan who regularly has dinner else where has a low or zero level of desired service from the vendor.  Lasting service intensifiers: are individual stable factors that lead the customer to a high toned sensitivity to service.
  10. 10.  E.g you might for example believe that waiters should not keep customers waiting longer than 15 minutes to take their orders.  In general customers who are themselves in service business or have worked for them in the post seem to have especially strong service philosophy. Source of adequate service expectation (Levels) A different set of determinants affect adequate service, the level of service the customers find acceptable. The following are the factors that influence adequate service (Factors affecting the level of adequate service):
  11. 11. Temporary service intensities  Consists of short term, individual factors that make a customer aware of the need for service.  E.g personal emergency situation in which service is urgently needed (such as:  - an accident and the need for automobile insurance or a breakdown in office equipment during a busy period) raise the level of adequate service expectation, particularly the level of responsiveness required and considered acceptable. Perceived Service alternatives: are other providers from whom the customer can obtain service. From whom the customer can obtain service.
  12. 12.  If customers have multiple service providers to choose from, or if they provide the service for themselves (such as lawn care), their level of adequate service are higher than those of customers who believe it is not possible to get better service else where.  Eg: Small town:- Tiny Airpoprt, has reduced set of options in airline travel. This customers will be more tolerant of the service performance of the service carriers in the town because few alternative exists.  Their level of adequate service are low than other (vehicles) – more tolerant  We define this as customers perception of the degree to which customers exert an influence on the level of service receive.
  13. 13. Customer’s self- perceived service role.  Customers’ expectations are partly shaped by how well they believe they are performing their own roles in service delivery.  Their role may be here to specify the level of service expected  Eg:- A customer who is very explicit with a waiter about how rare he wants his steak cooked in a restaurant will probably be more dissatisfied if the meat comes to the table overcooked than a customer who does not articulate the degree of cookdneness expected.  Level of adequate service also influenced by situational factors, defined as service performance conditions that customers view as beyond the control of the service provider.  Eg: During the days following world trade center disaster, telephone and internet service was poor because so many, people were trying to get in touch with friends and relatives.  However, customers are forgiving because they understood the source of the problem.
  14. 14. The final factor that influence adequate service is predicted service, the level of service that customer believe they are likely to get.  If customers predict good service, their level of adequate service are likely to be higher than if they predict poor service.  Eg: Full- time residents in a college town usually predict faster restaurant service during summer months when students are not on campus  This prediction will probably lead them to have higher standards for adequate service in restaurants during the summer than during school month.
  15. 15. 3.2 Customer perception of service  Your perception of something is the way you think about it or the impetration you have of it.  In describing customer perception of service, we can raise two critical concepts: - Customer satisfaction - Service quality  Practitioners and writers in poplar press tend to use the terms satisfaction and quality interchangeably, but researchers have attempted to be more precise about the meaning and measurement, of the two concepts, resulting, in considerable debates.  The two concepts are fundamentally different in terms of their underlying causes and outcomes
  16. 16.  Although they have certain things in common, satisfaction is generally viewed as a broader concept, where as service quality focuses specifically on dimensions of service customer satisfaction is influenced by: A. Specific product features Eg:- For a service such as a resort hotel important features might include:  The pool area  Access to golf facilities  Restaurant  Room comfort and privacy etc.
  17. 17. B. Perception of service quality  Perception of service quality are based on five dimensions such as:  Reliability- ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately.  Responsiveness: - willingness to help customers and provide prompt service.  Assurance:- employees’ knowledge and their ability to inspire trust and confidence.  Empathy:- caring, individualized attention given to customers.  Tangibles: appearance of physical facility equipment, personal and written materials
  18. 18. C. Price D. Personal factors such as  Customers wood or emotion at state Eg: - When you are in a happy mood- you feel good services and the reverse it true E. Situational factors such as  Family member opinions will also influence satisfaction 3.3 Gaps model of service quality 1. The customer gap  Is the difference between customer expectations and perceptions  Customer expectations are standards or reference points that customers bring into service experience whereas customer perceptions are subjective assessment of actual service experiences.
  19. 19.  The reason for the gap is the providers gap  In order to bridge the gap between customer perception and expectations, the providers gaps 1 to 4 are required to be filled. 2. The providers gap  To close the all important customer gab, the gap model suggests that four other gaps- the providers gaps- need to be closed.  These gaps occur within the organization providing the service (hence the term providers gap) and include. Provider Gap 1: Not knowing what customer expect  It is the difference between Customer expectation of the service and company understanding of those expectations
  20. 20. Causes of Gap  Lack of market research orientation  Inadequate upward communication  Too many levels of management Strategies to reduce the gab  Communication with customers  Conduct marketing research  Encourage upward communication Provider Gap 2: Not Selecting the right service design and standards  A company might correctly perceive the customers needs but may not set a specified performance standards.
  21. 21. Causes of Gap  Inadequate management commitment to service quality  Absence of goal setting  Absence of customer driven standards  Resource constraints Strategies to reduce gap  Top management commitment  Develop service quality  Standardization of task Provider Gap 3: Not delivering the service standards  This the gap is the difference between service quality specification and actual service delivery.
  22. 22. Causes of Gap  Deficiencies in human resource policies  Failure to match supply and demand  Customers not fulfilling their roles Strategies to reduce gap  Team work, empowerment, role clarity, training  Synchronize demand and capacity  Communicating with customers Provider Gap 4: Not matching performance to promises This essentially a gap between  What you deliver and  Your external communication
  23. 23. Causes of Gap  Over promising  Ineffective management of customer expectations  Inadequate horizontal communication Strategies to reduce gap  Avoid propensity to over promise  Increase horizontal communication  Managing customer expectations
  24. 24. Measuring service quality  The most widely used measure for service quality has been the SERVQUAL measure of parasurman, Zalthmal and Brry, according to which customer assessment of service quality results from a comparison of service expectations and actual performance.  It measures the service quality on five service quality dimensions  SERVQUAL scores are expressed as the difference between expectation and perception.  When perceived performance rating are lower than expectations this a sight of poor quality, the reverse indicator good quality.

×