Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

Altmetrics - NISO Update ALAMW January 2016

1.420 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

NISO Altmetrics Initiative, Nettie Lagace
NISO Midwinter Standards Update ALAMW Jan 2016 Boston

Veröffentlicht in: Bildung
  • Login to see the comments

Altmetrics - NISO Update ALAMW January 2016

  1. 1. NISO Altmetrics Initiative Nettie Lagace NISO Update, ALA Midwinter, Boston January 10, 2016
  2. 2. NISO Altmetrics Initiative: Why worth funding? • Scholarly assessment is critical to the overall process – Which projects get funded – Who gets promoted and tenure – Which publications are prominent • Assessment has been based on citation since the 60s • Today’s scholars multiple types of interactions with scholarly content are not reflected – Is “non-traditional” scholarly output important too?
  3. 3. Working Groups • A development of definitions and descriptions of use • B definitions for appropriate metrics and calculation methodologies for specific output types and promotion and facilitation of use of persistent identifiers • C development of strategies to improve data quality through source data providers.
  4. 4. Steering Committee
  5. 5. Calendar • April 2015 – Group(s) start working • January 2016 – Draft documents • February 2016 – Comment periods • Late Spring 2016 – Completion of final draft & publication
  6. 6. Working Group A • Development of definitions for terms commonly used in alternative assessment metrics – enabling different stakeholders to know they are talking about the same thing • Descriptions of use cases which apply to various stakeholder groups
  7. 7. As work is progressing… • Quickly changing area • Various perspectives produce many assumptions and multiple nuances • Header entry, “What is Altmetrics?” • Categorization of definitions • Use cases sorted by persona
  8. 8. Working Group B • Definitions for appropriate metrics and calculation methodologies for specific output types • Promotion and facilitation of use of persistent identifiers in scholarly communications
  9. 9. As work is progressing… • 3 smaller subgroups – report and set of recommendations/next steps in the area of data metrics – organizing and collecting various outputs and indicators that can serve as alternative metrics – comprehensive catalog of persistent identifier players and schema • Output will likely be contributed to the CASRAI Data Dictionary
  10. 10. Working Group C • Development of strategies to improve data quality through source data providers
  11. 11. As work is progressing… • Creating a “Code of Conduct” for data providers; target groups: – altmetric data providers – data aggregators – users of altmetrics data and indicators • Issues around “community” data providers and “non-community” providers • Audit? Who?
  12. 12. Questions?

×