Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Baltic SCOPE stakeholder workshop on ENVIRONMENT - conflicts and synergies *

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige

Hier ansehen

1 von 6 Anzeige

Baltic SCOPE stakeholder workshop on ENVIRONMENT - conflicts and synergies *

Herunterladen, um offline zu lesen

Baltic SCOPE workshop discussion on ENVIRONMENT at Baltic SCOPE Central Baltic case (involving Latvia, Estonia and Sweden) stakeholder conference on 31 May - 1 June 2016 in Jurmala, LATVIA

Read more on: www.balticscope.eu

* The information presented is the working exercise on the cross-border maritime spatial planning discussions and can not be treated as the official opinion of the European Commission and the Member States involved in the consortium of the Baltic SCOPE project.

Baltic SCOPE workshop discussion on ENVIRONMENT at Baltic SCOPE Central Baltic case (involving Latvia, Estonia and Sweden) stakeholder conference on 31 May - 1 June 2016 in Jurmala, LATVIA

Read more on: www.balticscope.eu

* The information presented is the working exercise on the cross-border maritime spatial planning discussions and can not be treated as the official opinion of the European Commission and the Member States involved in the consortium of the Baltic SCOPE project.

Anzeige
Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Diashows für Sie (20)

Andere mochten auch (13)

Anzeige

Ähnlich wie Baltic SCOPE stakeholder workshop on ENVIRONMENT - conflicts and synergies * (20)

Weitere von Pan Baltic Scope / Baltic SCOPE (20)

Anzeige

Aktuellste (20)

Baltic SCOPE stakeholder workshop on ENVIRONMENT - conflicts and synergies *

  1. 1. Workshop on Sector conflicts and synergies: Environment vs. Other sectors Anda Ruskule Jūrmala, 1 June, 2016
  2. 2. Environment vs. Shipping: The most significant conflict of transboundary and MSP relevance: • Intensively used shipping routes - possible negative impacts on areas of high ecological values, e.g. disturbance to species, risks of oil spills, damage to benthic habitats in shallow areas etc. – Agreements among planners and experts needed on thresholds/criteria when MSP solutions on rerouting of shipping zones have to be taken (e.g. important sites for red listed birds) – Proposals for rerouting can be integrated in MSP solutions, but agreements with stakeholders at international level needed for enforcement of these solutions in practice Other conflicts to be managed with other policy/legal instruments or at national/local level: • Pollution, sewage discharge • Level of noise – disturbance to species • Distribution of invasive species Conflicts:
  3. 3. Environment vs. Energy: The most significant conflict of transboundary and MSP relevance: • Windfarms in environmentally sensitive areas – Cumulative impacts of wind farms on bird migration patterns and bats – Noise from construction, pile driving impact to mammals (e.g. Harbour porpoise) – Impact on benthic habitats from construction of windfarms and cables • Windfarms creating favourable conditions for spreading of invasive species and replacement of native populations Conflicts to be managed at national/local level: • Impact on landscape Conflicts:
  4. 4. Environment vs. Fisheries: The most significant conflicts of transboundary and MSP relevance: • Negative impacts to benthic habitats caused by demersal trawling • By catch of marine mammals and birds  Temporal restrictions or restriction of certain gears in certain areas (e.g. spawning and nursery areas of fish, bird concentration areas) • Damage to fishing gears caused by seals Conflicts:
  5. 5. Environment vs. Shipping: • Shipping safety as common interest of both sectors. Environment vs. Energy: • Increasing share in use of renewable energy sources  Suitable places shall be indicated outside of environmentally sensitive areas • Positive impact of offshore windfarms on marine biodiversity - creating sanctuaries for fish and artificial reefs as habitats for benthic communities  Side effect to be taken into account, but can be considered as measure for increasing biodiversity Environment vs. Fisheries: • Maintaining of benthic habitats important for marine biodiversity as well as for viable fish stocks • Sustainable use of fish stocks • Directing fisheries activity for catch of invasive species Synergies:
  6. 6. Thank you!

×