This document summarizes a presentation on examining the experiences of course developers and faculty designing courses in an open manner. It discusses:
- Definitions of openness from participants' perspectives
- How openness was framed and implemented in a Master of Arts in Learning and Technology program through open educational practices, open educational resources, and open course design
- Preliminary findings from a faculty survey on challenges, supports needed, and impact on course design when teaching openly
- Emerging themes around balancing openness with privacy, modeling open practices, and moving openness initiatives forward through collaboration.
1. DESIGNING IN THE OPEN:
EXAMINING THE EXPERIENCES OF
COURSE DEVELOPERS & FACULTY
WHILE YOU ARE WAITING
Join our Padlet for this session
• https://padlet.com/echilds/4elklgiixe6g
2. June 1 – 2, 2017
ETUG
Jo Axe, PhD
Keith Webster, MA
Elizabeth Childs, PhD
DESIGNING IN THE OPEN: EXAMINING
THE EXPERIENCES OF COURSE
DEVELOPERS & FACULTY
3. We would like to
begin by
acknowledging that
the land on which we
gather is the unceded
territory of the Syilx
(Okanagan) Peoples.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
4. INTRODUCTIONS
Jo Axe
PhD
Associate Professor and
Director, School of
Education and Technology
Keith Webster
MA
Instructional Designer
Centre for Teaching and
Educational Technologies
Elizabeth Childs
PhD
Associate Professor and
MALAT Program Head, School
of Education and Technology
5. Royal Roads University Context
• Predominantly Master’s programs
• Most programs = blended model (short residencies + fully
online); some fully online programs
• Institutional Learning and Teaching Model
• Two Faculties
– Faculty of Social and Applied
Sciences
– Faculty of Management
• College of Interdisciplinary
Studies
6. Add into the Padlet
• What is your definition of openness?
• What is your main concern?
• https://padlet.com/echilds/4elklgiixe6g
7. • Open scholarship and access
(research journals)
• Open data (research and public
sector)
• Open educational resources (texts)
• Open educational practices
(pedagogy and platforms)
• Open source software (linux, etc.)
• Open business models (sharing
economy)
• Open policy (public sector)
Commonality, sharing and
crowdsourcing
Japanese proverb –
”None of us are a smart as all of
us”
Complexity = Multiple definitions of “ Open”
Image: CC BY-SA Michael Paskevicius
In the beginning….
open source software
8. Paradox of Openness
• Open in a “closed” system of silos
Academic institutions have traditionally been plagued with the conception of
knowledge silos, but it is important to consider that knowledge silos are not
only academic endeavors, but also nationalistic and cultural silos that are
slowly becoming obsolete. With the global learning communities tearing down
the metaphoric walls and developing more humanistic and more fully
embracing understandings that humans are equal within this global society
(Crawford, 2015, p. 12)
• The value of Open Discourse (e.g. interdisciplinary themes;
apprentices interacting with experts) in an increasingly cautious
world of cybersecurity, privacy and identity issues, and
personal digital (il)literacy
• Holistic view of openness (IT, ED tech, content, faculty,
networked scholarship) = communities of practice and purpose
9. Why Openness? Why Now?
• Openness as a vehicle for educational change
– Program review; external stakeholders
• Intention
• To extend the mindset of openness across a graduate program: to model the
model.
• Openness as a design principles of a MA program (MA in Learning &
Technology)
– Explicit in the program goal statement
– Inherent in the program learning outcomes
– Central to the overall program design (OEP)
– Embedded in each course
• OEP
• OER
10. Framing Openness – in MALAT
• Digital experience for learners
• Openness as a vehicle for educational change - teaching and learning
environments; teaching practices
• Consistent with social constructionism; constructivism and the RRU LTM
• The 5 R’s (retain, reuse, revise, remix, redistribute)
• Resources; assignments; syllabus
• Openness is a goal in itself – to be open for the benefits and
challenges we (faculty and students) can experience from being open
that go beyond saving students money.
• Consistent with the concept of expansive openness (Kimmons, 2016)
• Levels of openness; across program/course/activities/assessment
11. The program is founded upon principles of networked learning
and open pedagogy where students will collaborate and
contribute meaningfully to digital learning networks and
communities in the field.
Graduates will be able to work in the creation and evaluation of
digital learning environments. Students will apply theoretical
and practical knowledge to critically analyze learning
innovations and assess their impact on organizations and
society.
http://www.royalroads.ca/prospective-students/master-arts-learning-and-
technology/program-description
13. Where we started Fall 2016
• Openness as a continually
negotiated space who’s definition
is always a “work in progress”
• Open educational practices (OEP)
we resonate with “collaborative
practices which include the
creation, use and reuse of OER, as
well as pedagogical practices
employing participatory
technologies and social networks
for interaction, peer-learning,
knowledge creation and
empowerment of learners”
(Cronin, 2017)
Where we are now April 2017
• A key tenet of open
education is that
education can be
improved by making
educational assets
visible and accessible
and by harnessing the
collective wisdom of a
community of practice
and reflection (Iiyoshi
& Kumar, 2008, p. 2)
Our current working definition…
15. A Journey into Risk
GREATER CONTROL
Standards used to maintain effectiveness
•Strict peer review processes
•Standard templates
Institutional commitment and vision
•Extensive resources
•High investment
•Collaboration within institution
Peer collaboration approaches
•Communities of Practice
•Blogs/email/social bookmarking
•Discipline based repositories
Active student involvement
•Student searches
•Collaboration in development platforms
•Student delimit their own search requirements
User decisions shape processes
•Networks disperse responsibility
•Crowd sourced quality control
HIGHER RISK
Figure 2: A Continuum of Openness
Judith & Bull, 2016
16. At your tables discuss ….
• What excites you about openness in higher
education?
• What are you apprehensive about as you
consider openness in higher education?
• What support do you need as you consider
openness?
• https://padlet.com/echilds/4elklgiixe6g
17. Open, in the context of
evolution of Learning Design
Classrooms
Sage-on-stage
Acetates-on-screen
Essays-as-assessment
Course design for
online
More modes of content
and expression in web
format
Course design for OPEN
What is definition of Open for the institution and each instructor?
What does this mean for design?
How does Open change learning activities and assessment?
18. Openness & Networked Learning:
From a Developers Viewpoint
Adapted from: Paskevicius, M & Forssman, V. (2017). The role of educational developers in supporting open educational practices. Open Ed Global Mar 8 –
10, 2017 Cape Town South Africa licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
OEP & Networked Learning
Closed
practices
Networked
practices
Non-networked
practices
Open
practices
Engaging students
to create blogs &
portfolios
Sharing resources
among colleagues
Engaging students
in discussion
within closed LMS
Lecturing in class
Using & sharing open
resources online
Collaborating on
open access, open
licensed resources
Engaging students
in using & creating
open access, open
licensed resources
Creating open
access, open
licensed resources
19. Openness as a Continuum:
CTET and IT actions
Technical
• WordPress as main course sites & individual
student WP sites; Moodle for dropboxes & news
• Design assistance to leverage WP ecosystem
• Syndication of content between sites: links and
republishing using RSS/OPML & FeedWordPress
• WordPress hosted with Canadian cloud
• Integration of secure authentication (Shibboleth)
• Informed consent for users
• Privacy impact assessment to meet FIPPA
requirements
20. MALAT Ecosystem
Course Site
Student Site
Course Site Student Site
Student SiteRSS
OPMLRSS
RSS
RSS
Feedly
RSS: individual site feeds to other
sites
OPML: many site feeds to feed
reader (Feedly) & to Course Site
for republishing
21. Openness as a Continuum:
Academic Program Decisions
– WordPress:
• as main course sites: Moodle as companion course shell
(Grade Book)
• Student WordPress sites
– CC licensing in AF course development & delivery contracts
– Collaborative course design via Google Docs
– Readings and resources: open; in RRU library; fair dealing
– Assessment details rubrics on course sites
– Renewable assignments (Wikibooks; co-created rubrics)
– Co-created rubrics
– Discussions public (via student sites) & private (Moodle)
23. The Participants….
• Were
– between the ages of 46 and 65
– adjunct faculty
– 75% female, 25% male
• Had
– mixed experiences designing for open delivery: 50% had
designed for open; 50% had not designed for open
– not taught in the open previously
24. Preliminary Findings
Areas for Further Exploration
“Offering something without barriers or
filters.”
“Education benefits with more minds
involved.”
“Public, accessible, connected via the larger
Web, levels, networked, antithesis of "walled
garden"
Understanding of Openness
25. Preliminary Findings
Areas for Further Exploration
“Considering where and when it makes
sense to be open, taking into consideration
student comfort level, mutual student/public
benefit, networked /connected learning,
enhancing digital literacy, risk.”
“Think about the aspects of the course that
can be openly shared without risk to privacy
or to the comfort levels of the learners.”
Impact of Openness on Design
26. Preliminary Findings
Areas for Further Exploration
“Understanding of the architecture… how to
create "open" and "closed" areas and activities
that are flexible for learners.”
“CTET support, guidance from the program head
and school director, guidance from other faculty
with more expertise.”
“Just a better appreciation of the possibilities”
Anticipated Supports
27. Preliminary Findings
Areas for Further Exploration
“Ensuring the right information is made 'open’.”
“Having to double-design some activities in
anticipation of the unwillingness of some learners to
openly share their formative work.”
“Designing activities that meet the needs of
different learners.”
“There are still important journals and white papers
that are unavailable as OERs…ensure that important
new research is not overlooked just because it is
not openly available.”
Challenges
28. “There is both potential for gain, and
potential to do harm.”
Other Considerations
Preliminary Findings
Areas for Further Exploration
29. Emerging Themes and Current
Questions
• Uncertainty isn’t a bad thing – it is necessary for learning
• Model the model – trickier than it sounds
– Level of comfort for risk & change lies at the individual; program &
institutional level & all can be different and exert different pressures
– At the same time you can have institutional structures that are supportive
and not supportive
• Practically we are exploring:
– open assessment – assessment in the open
– Learner support for their journey along the openness continuum
– Informed consent – timing and repetition
– Development team & dynamic delivery decisions hand off?
• Researching the student experience of openness
30. At your tables….
• What do we collectively need to do to move
forward on openness?
• What do you need to know more about?
• https://padlet.com/echilds/4elklgiixe6g
31. Thank you & we would love
to hear from you
jo.axe@royalroads.ca
elizabeth.childs@royalroads.ca
Keith.webster@RoyalRoads.ca
32. References
• Falconer, I., Littlejohn, A., McGill, L., & Beetham, H. (2016). Motives and
tensions in the release of Open Educational Resources: the JISC UKOER
programme. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 92–
105. doi:10.14742/ajet.2258
• Judith, K., & Bull, D. (2016). Assessing the potential for openness: A
framework for examining course-level OER implementation in higher
education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(42).
doi:10.14507/epaa.24.1931
• Masterman, L., & Wild, J. (2013). Reflections on the evolving landscape of
OER use. Paper presented at OER13: creating a virtuous circle,
Nottingham, UK
• Stagg, A. (2014). OER adoption: a continuum for practice. Universities and
Knowledge Society Journal, 11(3), 151 – 164. doi:10.7238/rusc.v11i3.2102
Hinweis der Redaktion
Place and space – being invited in; recognition of those that have gone before
The pragmatist; the dreamer and the one who keeps us honest – my categorizations not theirs
Population of Canada fits into the state of California – just a reminder of scale and scope ;)
Quick background orientation to RRU – may need to change picture to one that shows campus and online pieces
UNSECO 5 pillars of learning - Learning to know; do; live together; to be; to transform oneself and society 13 facets to the LTM – premise of experiential and authentic learning and teaching. We understand learning as a socially constructed activity and we conceptualize lifelong learning as a process of social and personal discovery beyond acquisition of knowledge
Associate Faculty model
10 courses ( 3 core faculty rest AF)
MALAT
33 credit Masters; 18 credit Diploma
Two delivery options:
Fully online
Blended
mostly online with a short, two week on-campus residency
Length:
Online: 27 months
Blended: 24 months
Students from each pathway meet in LRNT 503 and continue the program together as one learning community.
Story – examples (MALAT; Jaigris and Rob M)
Digital storytelling in the open examples
Padlet – MALAT folks
Openness as a vehicle for educational change - teaching and learning environments; teaching practices
Consistent with social constructionism; constructivism etc.
The 5 R’s (retain, reuse, revise, remix, redistribute)
Resources; assignments; syllabus
Openness is a goal in itself – to be open for the benefits and challenges we (faculty and students) can experience from being open that go beyond saving students money.
Consistent with the concept of expansive openness (Kimmons, 2016)
Levels of openness; across program/course/activities/assessment
Timing is everything:
MA program redesign – 5 year review
Changing landscape of Higher Ed
Internal champions/external push
Side story – point 1 – talking about changing practice in a raw vegan restaurant as opposed to the 3rd floor or a historic library building
Point #2 ; intentionality behind being open – optimistic stance (starting point = open and that is what we are trying to do but not all of us are there yet – because we start from different knowledge and understanding of open/possibilities/trust/power&control
A lot of the openness – open pedagogy is unclear and messy. Part of the challenge is that a lot of OER work centres around resources which is easier to come up with a definition for (it’s a paper; a thing people can edit/change/ share etc.)
Where we are approaching this is from the standpoint of a continuum of openness and having looked at the lit there are other people have looked at this notion of a continuum but they tend to centre on OER uptake; risk; etc. By going through this and reading the lit we realize there are levels of openness (cite the models in the graphics) but the approach that is resonating with us is Kimmons notion of expansive openness
George’s work – “open should not only refer to the content that we use but also the practices and communities that emerge around that content (2013)”
I wanted to study what happens in OOS! But quickly realised that only students who had those opportunities were ones who were taught by open educators...
* Typically, educators are not asked/required to teach in OOS. It is a *choice*... (TITLE!)
It is this choice that I wanted to explore... Why/why not? What encourages/repels? What happens in OOS?
While both individual & systemic motivators are drivers of openness, I explore role of ind AGENCY re: how OEP are used in HE
CONTEXT: Much literature re: benefits of openness, some re: barriers to openness.
MY AIM: conduct an empirical study in a university setting.…using a critical approach to openness.
The concept of “open education” has continued to evolve since then [1975], but a definitive definition is really no closer
to reality. Iiyoshi and Kumar (2008) noted this in the introduction to their book on the topic, in which they stated:
“Rather than propose one more definition, our reference to open education embraces the many dimensions of this movement
as well the many interpretations of the term ‘open’ as it has been applied to education over time, such as increased access, greater choice and flexibility. What we offer instead is an extension to those definitions that emphasizes the value of collectively
leading to an assertion (more in the nature of aspiration) that a key tenet of open education
is that education can be improved by making educational assets visible and accessible and by harnessing the collective wisdom
of a community of practice and reflection.”(Iiyoshi & Kumar, 2008, p. 2)
Stagg (2014) offers the following continuum of practice
The proposed model seeks to acknowledge the complexity of applied knowledge required to fulsomely engage with open education by examining practitioner behaviours and the necessary supporting mechanisms. This conceptual model aims to be of use to both practitioners and also those responsible for designing professional development in an educational setting.
As we got talking about openness – we discovered that there was a continuum of openness and now that we realized there is we are trying to define it. What we are realizing is that there is a continuum of openness for each of the “program design decisions”
Unlike open’closed journals - Don’t have much guidance – in the open assessment space so we are still exploring
We have a good concept of what is a open reading; student product (cc licenses to blog for example) but what about assessment?
Faculty and AF – how open do they need to be to teach in this program? What expectations are we cultivating? How are we modeling digital wellbeing that Helen Beetham and others talk about?
SO, if you have tried something like this we would love ot talk with you . reinforce we are just starting – have not yet implemented courses – if there are folks who have done something similar we would love to hear from you about lessons learned that we should be considering for implementation.
Little or a lot of support for going outside the LMS (CTET very supportive)
Defining Open Pedagogy – David Wiley quote from What is Open Pedagogy Oct 21, 2013
What makes this assignment an instance of open pedagogy instead of just another something we require students to do? As described, the assignment is impossible without the permissions granted by open licenses. This is the ultimate test of whether or not a particular approach or technique can rightly be called “open pedagogy” – is it possible without the free access and 4R permissions characteristic of open educational resources? If the answer is yes, then you may have an effective educational practice but you don’t have an instance of open pedagogy. Open pedagogy is that set of teaching and learning practices only possible in the context of the free access and 4R permissions characteristic of open educational resources.
Want a conversation that expands beyond the tech stuff –
Each time we do this – pull things out of the padlet