SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 82
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
11th
Edition
Chapter 13
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Relevant Costs for Decision
Making
Chapter Thirteen
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Cost Concepts for Decision Making
A relevant cost is a cost that differs
between alternatives.
1
2
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Identifying Relevant Costs
An avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole orAn avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole or
in part) by choosing one alternative overin part) by choosing one alternative over
another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs.another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs.
Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs.Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs.
Two broad categories of costs are neverTwo broad categories of costs are never
relevant in any decision and include:relevant in any decision and include:
Sunk costs.Sunk costs.
Future costs thatFuture costs that do not differdo not differ between thebetween the
alternatives.alternatives.
An avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole orAn avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole or
in part) by choosing one alternative overin part) by choosing one alternative over
another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs.another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs.
Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs.Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs.
Two broad categories of costs are neverTwo broad categories of costs are never
relevant in any decision and include:relevant in any decision and include:
Sunk costs.Sunk costs.
Future costs thatFuture costs that do not differdo not differ between thebetween the
alternatives.alternatives.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Relevant Cost Analysis: A Two-Step
Process
Eliminate costs and benefits that do not differ
between alternatives.
Use the remaining costs and benefits that do
differ between alternatives in making the
decision. The costs that remain are the
differential, or avoidable, costs.
Step 1
Step 2
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Different Costs for Different Purposes
Costs that are
relevant in one
decision situation
may not be relevant
in another context.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Identifying Relevant Costs
Annual Cost
of Fixed Items
Cost per
Mile
1 Annual straight-line depreciation on car 2,800$ 0.280$
2 Cost of gasoline 0.050
3 Annual cost of auto insurance and license 1,380 0.138
4 Maintenance and repairs 0.065
5 Parking fees at school 360 0.036
6 Total average cost 0.569$
Automobile Costs (based on 10,000 miles driven per year)
Cynthia, a Boston student, is considering visiting her friend in New York.Cynthia, a Boston student, is considering visiting her friend in New York.
She can drive or take the train. By car it is 230 miles to her friend’sShe can drive or take the train. By car it is 230 miles to her friend’s
apartment. She is trying to decide which alternative is less expensiveapartment. She is trying to decide which alternative is less expensive
and has gathered the following information:and has gathered the following information:
Cynthia, a Boston student, is considering visiting her friend in New York.Cynthia, a Boston student, is considering visiting her friend in New York.
She can drive or take the train. By car it is 230 miles to her friend’sShe can drive or take the train. By car it is 230 miles to her friend’s
apartment. She is trying to decide which alternative is less expensiveapartment. She is trying to decide which alternative is less expensive
and has gathered the following information:and has gathered the following information:
$45 per month$45 per month × 8 months× 8 months$45 per month$45 per month × 8 months× 8 months $1.60 per gallon ÷ 32 MPG$1.60 per gallon ÷ 32 MPG
$18,000 cost$18,000 cost –– $4,000 salvage value$4,000 salvage value ÷ 5 years÷ 5 years$18,000 cost$18,000 cost –– $4,000 salvage value$4,000 salvage value ÷ 5 years÷ 5 years
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Identifying Relevant Costs
7 Reduction in resale value of car per mile of wear 0.026$
8 Round-tip train fare 104$
9 Benefits of relaxing on train trip ????
10 Cost of putting dog in kennel while gone 40$
11 Benefit of having car in New York ????
12 Hassle of parking car in New York ????
13 Per day cost of parking car in New York 25$
Some Additional Information
Annual Cost
of Fixed Items
Cost per
Mile
1 Annual straight-line depreciation on car 2,800$ 0.280$
2 Cost of gasoline 0.050
3 Annual cost of auto insurance and license 1,380 0.138
4 Maintenance and repairs 0.065
5 Parking fees at school 360 0.036
6 Total average cost 0.569$
Automobile Costs (based on 10,000 miles driven per year)
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Identifying Relevant Costs
Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’sWhich costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s
decision?decision?
Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’sWhich costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s
decision?decision?
The cost of the
car is a sunk cost
and is not
relevant to the
current decision.
The cost of the
car is a sunk cost
and is not
relevant to the
current decision.
However, the cost of gasoline is clearly relevant
if she decides to drive. If she takes the drive the
cost would now be incurred, so it varies
depending on the decision.
However, the cost of gasoline is clearly relevant
if she decides to drive. If she takes the drive the
cost would now be incurred, so it varies
depending on the decision.
The annual cost of
insurance is not
relevant. It will remain
the same if she drives
or takes the train.
The annual cost of
insurance is not
relevant. It will remain
the same if she drives
or takes the train.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Identifying Relevant Costs
Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s
decision?
Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s
decision?
The cost of
maintenance and
repairs is relevant. In
the long-run these
costs depend upon
miles driven.
The cost of
maintenance and
repairs is relevant. In
the long-run these
costs depend upon
miles driven.
The monthly
school parking
fee is not
relevant because
it must be paid if
Cynthia drives or
takes the train.
The monthly
school parking
fee is not
relevant because
it must be paid if
Cynthia drives or
takes the train.
At this point, we can see that some of the average
cost of $0.569 per mile are relevant and others are
not.
At this point, we can see that some of the average
cost of $0.569 per mile are relevant and others are
not.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Identifying Relevant Costs
Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s
decision?
Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s
decision?
The decline in resale
value due to additional
miles is a relevant
cost.
The decline in resale
value due to additional
miles is a relevant
cost.
The round-trip train
fare is clearly relevant.
If she drives the cost
can be avoided.
The round-trip train
fare is clearly relevant.
If she drives the cost
can be avoided.
Relaxing on the train is
relevant even though it
is difficult to assign a
dollar value to the
benefit.
Relaxing on the train is
relevant even though it
is difficult to assign a
dollar value to the
benefit.
The kennel cost is not
relevant because
Cynthia will incur the
cost if she drives or
takes the train.
The kennel cost is not
relevant because
Cynthia will incur the
cost if she drives or
takes the train.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Identifying Relevant Costs
Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s
decision?
Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s
decision?
The cost of parking is
relevant because it can
be avoided if she takes
the train.
The cost of parking is
relevant because it can
be avoided if she takes
the train.
The benefits of having a car in New York and
the problems of finding a parking space are
both relevant but are difficult to assign a
dollar amount.
The benefits of having a car in New York and
the problems of finding a parking space are
both relevant but are difficult to assign a
dollar amount.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Identifying Relevant Costs
From a financial standpoint, Cynthia would be better
off taking the train to visit her friend. Some of the
non-financial factor may influence her final decision.
From a financial standpoint, Cynthia would be better
off taking the train to visit her friend. Some of the
non-financial factor may influence her final decision.
Gasoline (460 @ $0.050 per mile) 23.00$
Maintenance (460 @ $0.065 per mile) 29.90
Reduction in resale (460 @ $0.026 per mile) 11.96
Parking in New York (2 days @ $25 per day) 50.00
Total 114.86$
Relevant Financial Cost of Driving
Round-trip ticket 104.00$
Relevant Financial Cost of Taking the Train
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Total and Differential Cost Approaches
The management of a company is considering a new laborsaving
machine that rents for $3,000 per year. Data about the company’s
annual sales and costs with and without the new machine are:
Current
Situation
Situation
With New
Machine
Differential
Costs and
Benefits
Sales (5,000 units @ $40 per unit) 200,000$ 200,000$ -
Less variable expenses:
Direct materials (5,000 units @ $14 per unit) 70,000 70,000 -
Direct labor (5,000 units @ $8 and $5 per unit) 40,000 25,000 15,000
Variable overhead (5,000 units @ $2 per unit) 10,000 10,000 -
Total variable expenses 120,000 105,000 -
Contribution margin 80,000 95,000 15,000
Less fixed expense:
Other 62,000 62,000 -
Rent on new machine - 3,000 (3,000)
Total fixed expenses 62,000 65,000 (3,000)
Net operating income 18,000$ 30,000$ 12,000
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Total and Differential Cost Approaches
Current
Situation
Situation
With New
Machine
Differential
Costs and
Benefits
Sales (5,000 units @ $40 per unit) 200,000$ 200,000$ -
Less variable expenses:
Direct materials (5,000 units @ $14 per unit) 70,000 70,000 -
Direct labor (5,000 units @ $8 and $5 per unit) 40,000 25,000 15,000
Variable overhead (5,000 units @ $2 per unit) 10,000 10,000 -
Total variable expenses 120,000 105,000 -
Contribution margin 80,000 95,000 15,000
Less fixed expense:
Other 62,000 62,000 -
Rent on new machine - 3,000 (3,000)
Total fixed expenses 62,000 65,000 (3,000)
Net operating income 18,000$ 30,000$ 12,000
As you see, the only costs that differ between the alternatives are the
direct labor costs savings and the increase in fixed rental costs.
We can efficiently analyze the decision by
looking at the different costs and revenues and
arrive at the same solution.
We can efficiently analyze the decision by
looking at the different costs and revenues and
arrive at the same solution.
Decrease in direct labor costs (5,000 units @ $3 per unit) 15,000$
Increase in fixed rental expenses (3,000)
Net annual cost saving from renting the new machine 12,000$
Net Advantage to Renting the New Machine
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Total and Differential Cost Approaches
Using the differential approach is desirable for
two reasons:
1. Only rarely will enough information be
available to prepare detailed income
statements for both alternatives.
2. Mingling irrelevant costs with relevant costs
may cause confusion and distract attention
away from the information that is really
critical.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Adding/Dropping Segments
One of the most important decisions
managers make is whether to add or
drop a business segment such as a
product or a store.
Let’s see how relevant costs shouldLet’s see how relevant costs should
be used in this type of decision.be used in this type of decision.
One of the most important decisions
managers make is whether to add or
drop a business segment such as a
product or a store.
Let’s see how relevant costs shouldLet’s see how relevant costs should
be used in this type of decision.be used in this type of decision.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Adding/Dropping Segments
Due to the declining popularity of digitalDue to the declining popularity of digital
watches, Lovell Company’s digitalwatches, Lovell Company’s digital
watch line has not reported a profit forwatch line has not reported a profit for
several years. Lovell is consideringseveral years. Lovell is considering
dropping this product line.dropping this product line.
Due to the declining popularity of digitalDue to the declining popularity of digital
watches, Lovell Company’s digitalwatches, Lovell Company’s digital
watch line has not reported a profit forwatch line has not reported a profit for
several years. Lovell is consideringseveral years. Lovell is considering
dropping this product line.dropping this product line.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A Contribution Margin Approach
DECISION RULE
Lovell should drop the digital watch segment only
if its profit would increase. This would only
happen if the fixed cost savings exceed the lost
contribution margin.
Let’s look at this solution.
DECISION RULE
Lovell should drop the digital watch segment only
if its profit would increase. This would only
happen if the fixed cost savings exceed the lost
contribution margin.
Let’s look at this solution.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Adding/Dropping Segments
Segment Income Statement
Digital Watches
Sales 500,000$
Less: variable expenses
Variable manufacturing costs 120,000$
Variable shipping costs 5,000
Commissions 75,000 200,000
Contribution margin 300,000$
Less: fixed expenses
General factory overhead 60,000$
Salary of line manager 90,000
Depreciation of equipment 50,000
Advertising - direct 100,000
Rent - factory space 70,000
General admin. expenses 30,000 400,000
Net operating loss (100,000)$
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Segment Income Statement
Digital Watches
Sales 500,000$
Less: variable expenses
Variable manufacuring costs 120,000$
Variable shipping costs 5,000
Commissions 75,000 200,000
Contribution margin 300,000$
Less: fixed expenses
General factory overhead 60,000$
Salary of line manager 90,000
Depreciation of equipment 50,000
Advertising - direct 100,000
Rent - factory space 70,000
General admin. expenses 30,000 400,000
Net operating loss (100,000)$
Adding/Dropping Segments
Investigation has revealed thatInvestigation has revealed that total fixed generaltotal fixed general
factory overheadfactory overhead andand generalgeneral
administrative expensesadministrative expenses would not be affected ifwould not be affected if
the digital watch line is dropped. The fixedthe digital watch line is dropped. The fixed
general factory overhead and generalgeneral factory overhead and general
administrative expenses assigned to this productadministrative expenses assigned to this product
would be reallocated to other product lines.would be reallocated to other product lines.
Investigation has revealed thatInvestigation has revealed that total fixed generaltotal fixed general
factory overheadfactory overhead andand generalgeneral
administrative expensesadministrative expenses would not be affected ifwould not be affected if
the digital watch line is dropped. The fixedthe digital watch line is dropped. The fixed
general factory overhead and generalgeneral factory overhead and general
administrative expenses assigned to this productadministrative expenses assigned to this product
would be reallocated to other product lines.would be reallocated to other product lines.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Adding/Dropping Segments
Segment Income Statement
Digital Watches
Sales 500,000$
Less: variable expenses
Variable manufacturing costs 120,000$
Variable shipping costs 5,000
Commissions 75,000 200,000
Contribution margin 300,000$
Less: fixed expenses
General factory overhead 60,000$
Salary of line manager 90,000
Depreciation of equipment 50,000
Advertising - direct 100,000
Rent - factory space 70,000
General admin. expenses 30,000 400,000
Net operating loss (100,000)$
The equipment used to manufactureThe equipment used to manufacture
digital watches has no resaledigital watches has no resale
value or alternative use.value or alternative use.
The equipment used to manufactureThe equipment used to manufacture
digital watches has no resaledigital watches has no resale
value or alternative use.value or alternative use.
Should Lovell retain or drop
the digital watch segment?
Should Lovell retain or drop
the digital watch segment?
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
A Contribution Margin Approach
Contribution Margin
Solution
Contribution margin lost if digital
watches are dropped (300,000)$
Less fixed costs that can be avoided
Salary of the line manager 90,000$
Advertising - direct 100,000
Rent - factory space 70,000 260,000
Net disadvantage (40,000)$
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Comparative Income Approach
The Lovell solution can also be obtained by
preparing comparative income statements
showing results with and without the digital
watch segment.
Let’s look at this second approach.Let’s look at this second approach.
The Lovell solution can also be obtained by
preparing comparative income statements
showing results with and without the digital
watch segment.
Let’s look at this second approach.Let’s look at this second approach.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Comparative Income Approach
Solution
Keep
Digital
Watches
Drop
Digital
Watches Difference
Sales 500,000$ -$ (500,000)$
Less variable expenses: -
Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000
Shipping 5,000 - 5,000
Commissions 75,000 - 75,000
Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000
Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000)
Less fixed expenses:
General factory overhead 60,000
Salary of line manager 90,000
Depreciation 50,000
Advertising - direct 100,000
Rent - factory space 70,000
General admin. expenses 30,000
Total fixed expenses 400,000
Net operating loss (100,000)$
If the digital watch
line is dropped, the
company gives up
its contribution
margin.
If the digital watch
line is dropped, the
company gives up
its contribution
margin.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Comparative Income Approach
Solution
Keep
Digital
Watches
Drop
Digital
Watches Difference
Sales 500,000$ -$ (500,000)$
Less variable expenses: -
Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000
Shipping 5,000 - 5,000
Commissions 75,000 - 75,000
Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000
Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000)
Less fixed expenses:
General factory overhead 60,000 60,000 -
Salary of line manager 90,000
Depreciation 50,000
Advertising - direct 100,000
Rent - factory space 70,000
General admin. expenses 30,000
Total fixed expenses 400,000
Net operating loss (100,000)$
On the other hand, the general
factory overhead would be the
same. So this cost really isn’t
relevant.
On the other hand, the general
factory overhead would be the
same. So this cost really isn’t
relevant.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Comparative Income Approach
Solution
Keep
Digital
Watches
Drop
Digital
Watches Difference
Sales 500,000$ -$ (500,000)$
Less variable expenses: -
Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000
Shipping 5,000 - 5,000
Commissions 75,000 - 75,000
Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000
Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000)
Less fixed expenses:
General factory overhead 60,000 60,000 -
Salary of line manager 90,000 - 90,000
Depreciation 50,000
Advertising - direct 100,000
Rent - factory space 70,000
General admin. expenses 30,000
Total fixed expenses 400,000
Net operating loss (100,000)$
But we wouldn’t need a
manager for the product line
anymore.
But we wouldn’t need a
manager for the product line
anymore.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Comparative Income Approach
Solution
Keep
Digital
Watches
Drop
Digital
Watches Difference
Sales 500,000$ -$ (500,000)$
Less variable expenses: -
Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000
Shipping 5,000 - 5,000
Commissions 75,000 - 75,000
Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000
Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000)
Less fixed expenses:
General factory overhead 60,000 60,000 -
Salary of line manager 90,000 - 90,000
Depreciation 50,000 50,000 -
Advertising - direct 100,000
Rent - factory space 70,000
General admin. expenses 30,000
Total fixed expenses 400,000
Net operating loss (100,000)$
If the digital watch line is dropped, the net book value
of the equipment would be written off. The
depreciation that would have been taken will flow
through the income statement as a loss instead.
If the digital watch line is dropped, the net book value
of the equipment would be written off. The
depreciation that would have been taken will flow
through the income statement as a loss instead.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Comparative Income Approach
Solution
Keep
Digital
Watches
Drop
Digital
Watches Difference
Sales 500,000$ -$ (500,000)$
Less variable expenses: -
Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000
Shipping 5,000 - 5,000
Commissions 75,000 - 75,000
Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000
Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000)
Less fixed expenses:
General factory overhead 60,000 60,000 -
Salary of line manager 90,000 - 90,000
Depreciation 50,000 50,000 -
Advertising - direct 100,000 - 100,000
Rent - factory space 70,000 - 70,000
General admin. expenses 30,000 30,000 -
Total fixed expenses 400,000 140,000 260,000
Net operating loss (100,000)$ (140,000)$ (40,000)$
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Beware of Allocated Fixed Costs
Why should we keep theWhy should we keep the
digital watch segmentdigital watch segment
when it’s showing awhen it’s showing a
$100,000$100,000 lossloss??
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Beware of Allocated Fixed Costs
The answer lies in theThe answer lies in the
way we allocateway we allocate
common fixed costscommon fixed costs toto
our products.our products.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Beware of Allocated Fixed Costs
Our allocations canOur allocations can
make a segment lookmake a segment look
less profitableless profitable than itthan it
really is.really is.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Make or Buy Decision
When a company is involved in more than oneWhen a company is involved in more than one
activity in the entire value chain, it is verticallyactivity in the entire value chain, it is vertically
integrated. A decision to carry out one of theintegrated. A decision to carry out one of the
activities in the value chain internally, rather thanactivities in the value chain internally, rather than
to buy externally from a supplier is called ato buy externally from a supplier is called a
“make or buy” decision.“make or buy” decision.
When a company is involved in more than oneWhen a company is involved in more than one
activity in the entire value chain, it is verticallyactivity in the entire value chain, it is vertically
integrated. A decision to carry out one of theintegrated. A decision to carry out one of the
activities in the value chain internally, rather thanactivities in the value chain internally, rather than
to buy externally from a supplier is called ato buy externally from a supplier is called a
“make or buy” decision.“make or buy” decision.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Vertical Integration- Advantages
Smoother flow of
parts and materials
Better quality
control
Realize profits
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Vertical Integration- Disadvantage
Companies may fail
to take advantage of
suppliers who can
create economies of
scale advantage by
pooling demand from
numerous
companies.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Make or Buy Decision: An Example
• Essex Company manufactures part 4A that is
used in one of its products.
• The unit product cost of this part is:
Direct materials $ 9
Direct labor 5
Variable overhead 1
Depreciation of special equip. 3
Supervisor's salary 2
General factory overhead 10
Unit product cost 30$
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Make or Buy Decision
• The special equipment used to manufacture part 4A
has no resale value.
• The total amount of general factory overhead, which
is allocated on the basis of direct labor hours, would
be unaffected by this decision.
• The $30 unit product cost is based on 20,000 parts
produced each year.
• An outside supplier has offered to provide the
20,000 parts at a cost of $25 per part.
Should we accept the supplier’s offer?Should we accept the supplier’s offer?
• The special equipment used to manufacture part 4A
has no resale value.
• The total amount of general factory overhead, which
is allocated on the basis of direct labor hours, would
be unaffected by this decision.
• The $30 unit product cost is based on 20,000 parts
produced each year.
• An outside supplier has offered to provide the
20,000 parts at a cost of $25 per part.
Should we accept the supplier’s offer?Should we accept the supplier’s offer?
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Cost
Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units
Make Buy
Outside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000
Direct materials 9$ 180,000
Direct labor 5 100,000
Variable overhead 1 20,000
Depreciation of equip. 3 -
Supervisor's salary 2 40,000
General factory overhead 10 -
Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$
The Make or Buy Decision
20,000 × $9 per unit = $180,00020,000 × $9 per unit = $180,00020,000 × $9 per unit = $180,00020,000 × $9 per unit = $180,000
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Cost
Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units
Make Buy
Outside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000
Direct materials 9$ 180,000
Direct labor 5 100,000
Variable overhead 1 20,000
Depreciation of equip. 3 -
Supervisor's salary 2 40,000
General factory overhead 10 -
Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$
The Make or Buy Decision
The special equipment has no resaleThe special equipment has no resale
value and is a sunk cost.value and is a sunk cost.
The special equipment has no resaleThe special equipment has no resale
value and is a sunk cost.value and is a sunk cost.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Cost
Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units
Make Buy
Outside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000
Direct materials 9$ 180,000
Direct labor 5 100,000
Variable overhead 1 20,000
Depreciation of equip. 3 -
Supervisor's salary 2 40,000
General factory overhead 10 -
Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$
The Make or Buy Decision
Not avoidable; irrelevant. If the product is
dropped, it will be reallocated to other products.
Not avoidable; irrelevant. If the product is
dropped, it will be reallocated to other products.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Make or Buy Decision
Should we make or buy part 4A?Should we make or buy part 4A?
Cost
Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units
Make Buy
Outside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000
Direct materials 9$ 180,000
Direct labor 5 100,000
Variable overhead 1 20,000
Depreciation of equip. 3 -
Supervisor's salary 2 40,000
General factory overhead 10 -
Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Opportunity Cost
AnAn opportunity costopportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone as ais the benefit that is foregone as a
result of pursuing some course of action.result of pursuing some course of action.
Opportunity costs are not actual dollar outlays andOpportunity costs are not actual dollar outlays and
are not recorded in the formal accounts of anare not recorded in the formal accounts of an
organization.organization.
How would this concept potentially relate to the EssexHow would this concept potentially relate to the Essex
Company?Company?
AnAn opportunity costopportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone as ais the benefit that is foregone as a
result of pursuing some course of action.result of pursuing some course of action.
Opportunity costs are not actual dollar outlays andOpportunity costs are not actual dollar outlays and
are not recorded in the formal accounts of anare not recorded in the formal accounts of an
organization.organization.
How would this concept potentially relate to the EssexHow would this concept potentially relate to the Essex
Company?Company?
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Key Terms and Concepts
A special order is a one-time
order that is not considered
part of the company’s normal
ongoing business.
When analyzing a special
order only the incremental
costs and benefits are
relevant.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Special Orders
 Jet, Inc. makes a single product whose normal sellingJet, Inc. makes a single product whose normal selling
price is $20 per unit.price is $20 per unit.
 A foreign distributor offers to purchase 3,000 units for $10A foreign distributor offers to purchase 3,000 units for $10
per unit.per unit.
 This is a one-time order that would not affect theThis is a one-time order that would not affect the
company’s regular business.company’s regular business.
 Annual capacity is 10,000 units, but Jet, Inc. is currentlyAnnual capacity is 10,000 units, but Jet, Inc. is currently
producing and selling only 5,000 units.producing and selling only 5,000 units.
 Jet, Inc. makes a single product whose normal sellingJet, Inc. makes a single product whose normal selling
price is $20 per unit.price is $20 per unit.
 A foreign distributor offers to purchase 3,000 units for $10A foreign distributor offers to purchase 3,000 units for $10
per unit.per unit.
 This is a one-time order that would not affect theThis is a one-time order that would not affect the
company’s regular business.company’s regular business.
 Annual capacity is 10,000 units, but Jet, Inc. is currentlyAnnual capacity is 10,000 units, but Jet, Inc. is currently
producing and selling only 5,000 units.producing and selling only 5,000 units.
Should Jet accept the offer?Should Jet accept the offer?
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Special Orders
$8 variable cost$8 variable cost$8 variable cost$8 variable cost
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Special Orders
If Jet accepts the offer, net operating income will
increase by $6,000.
Increase in revenue (3,000 × $10) 30,000$
Increase in costs (3,000 × $8 variable cost) 24,000
Increase in net income 6,000$
Note: This answer assumes that fixed costs are
unaffected by the order and that variable marketing
costs must be incurred on the special order.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Quick Check 
Northern Optical ordinarily sells the X-lens for $50.
The variable production cost is $10, the fixed
production cost is $18 per unit, and the variable
selling cost is $1. A customer has requested a
special order for 10,000 units of the X-lens to be
imprinted with the customer’s logo. This special
order would not involve any selling costs, but
Northern Optical would have to purchase an
imprinting machine for $50,000.
(see the next page)
Northern Optical ordinarily sells the X-lens for $50.
The variable production cost is $10, the fixed
production cost is $18 per unit, and the variable
selling cost is $1. A customer has requested a
special order for 10,000 units of the X-lens to be
imprinted with the customer’s logo. This special
order would not involve any selling costs, but
Northern Optical would have to purchase an
imprinting machine for $50,000.
(see the next page)
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Quick Check 
What is the rock bottom minimum price below which
Northern Optical should not go in its negotiations
with the customer? In other words, below what
price would Northern Optical actually be losing
money on the sale? There is ample idle capacity to
fulfill the order and the imprinting machine has no
further use after this order.
a. $50
b. $10
c. $15
d. $29
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
What is the rock bottom minimum price below which
Northern Optical should not go in its negotiations
with the customer? In other words, below what
price would Northern Optical actually be losing
money on the sale? There is ample idle capacity to
fulfill the order and the imprinting machine has no
further use after this order.
a. $50
b. $10
c. $15
d. $29
Quick Check 
Variable production costVariable production cost $100,000$100,000
Additional fixed costAdditional fixed cost 50,00050,000
Total relevant costTotal relevant cost $150,000$150,000
Number of unitsNumber of units 10,00010,000
Average cost per unitAverage cost per unit $15$15
Variable production costVariable production cost $100,000$100,000
Additional fixed costAdditional fixed cost 50,00050,000
Total relevant costTotal relevant cost $150,000$150,000
Number of unitsNumber of units 10,00010,000
Average cost per unitAverage cost per unit $15$15
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Key Terms and Concepts
When a limited resource
of some type restricts
the company’s ability to
satisfy demand, the
company is said to have
a constraint.
The machine or process
that is limiting overall
output is called the
bottleneck – it is the
constraint.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
• When a constraint exists, a company shouldWhen a constraint exists, a company should
select a product mix that maximizes the totalselect a product mix that maximizes the total
contribution margin earned since fixed costscontribution margin earned since fixed costs
usually remain unchanged.usually remain unchanged.
• A company should not necessarily promoteA company should not necessarily promote
those products that have the highest unitthose products that have the highest unit
contribution margin.contribution margin.
• Rather, it should promote those products thatRather, it should promote those products that
earn the highest contribution margin in relation toearn the highest contribution margin in relation to
the constraining resource.the constraining resource.
• When a constraint exists, a company shouldWhen a constraint exists, a company should
select a product mix that maximizes the totalselect a product mix that maximizes the total
contribution margin earned since fixed costscontribution margin earned since fixed costs
usually remain unchanged.usually remain unchanged.
• A company should not necessarily promoteA company should not necessarily promote
those products that have the highest unitthose products that have the highest unit
contribution margin.contribution margin.
• Rather, it should promote those products thatRather, it should promote those products that
earn the highest contribution margin in relation toearn the highest contribution margin in relation to
the constraining resource.the constraining resource.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Utilization of a Constrained Resource: An
Example
Ensign Company produces two products and
selected data is shown below:
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
• Machine A1 is the constrained resource andMachine A1 is the constrained resource and
is being used at 100% of its capacity.is being used at 100% of its capacity.
• There is excess capacity on all otherThere is excess capacity on all other
machines.machines.
• Machine A1 has a capacity of 2,400 minutesMachine A1 has a capacity of 2,400 minutes
per week.per week.
Should Ensign focus its efforts onShould Ensign focus its efforts on
Product 1 or 2?Product 1 or 2?
• Machine A1 is the constrained resource andMachine A1 is the constrained resource and
is being used at 100% of its capacity.is being used at 100% of its capacity.
• There is excess capacity on all otherThere is excess capacity on all other
machines.machines.
• Machine A1 has a capacity of 2,400 minutesMachine A1 has a capacity of 2,400 minutes
per week.per week.
Should Ensign focus its efforts onShould Ensign focus its efforts on
Product 1 or 2?Product 1 or 2?
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Quick Check 
How many units of each product can be
processed through Machine A1 in one minute?
Product 1 Product 2
a. 1 unit 0.5 unit
b. 1 unit 2.0 units
c. 2 units 1.0 unit
d. 2 units 0.5 unit
How many units of each product can be
processed through Machine A1 in one minute?
Product 1 Product 2
a. 1 unit 0.5 unit
b. 1 unit 2.0 units
c. 2 units 1.0 unit
d. 2 units 0.5 unit
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
How many units of each product can be
processed through Machine A1 in one minute?
Product 1 Product 2
a. 1 unit 0.5 unit
b. 1 unit 2.0 units
c. 2 units 1.0 unit
d. 2 units 0.5 unit
How many units of each product can be
processed through Machine A1 in one minute?
Product 1 Product 2
a. 1 unit 0.5 unit
b. 1 unit 2.0 units
c. 2 units 1.0 unit
d. 2 units 0.5 unit
Quick Check 
I was just checking to make sure you are
with us.
I was just checking to make sure you are
with us.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Quick Check 
What generates more profit for the company,
using one minute of machine A1 to process
Product 1 or using one minute of machine A1
to process Product 2?
a. Product 1
b. Product 2
c. They both would generate the same profit.
d. Cannot be determined.
What generates more profit for the company,
using one minute of machine A1 to process
Product 1 or using one minute of machine A1
to process Product 2?
a. Product 1
b. Product 2
c. They both would generate the same profit.
d. Cannot be determined.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
What generates more profit for the company,
using one minute of machine A1 to process
Product 1 or using one minute of machine A1
to process Product 2?
a. Product 1
b. Product 2
c. They both would generate the same profit.
d. Cannot be determined.
What generates more profit for the company,
using one minute of machine A1 to process
Product 1 or using one minute of machine A1
to process Product 2?
a. Product 1
b. Product 2
c. They both would generate the same profit.
d. Cannot be determined.
Quick Check 
With one minute of machine A1, we could
make 1 unit of Product 1, with a contribution
margin of $24, or 2 units of Product 2, each
with a contribution margin of $15.
2 × $15 = $30 > $24
With one minute of machine A1, we could
make 1 unit of Product 1, with a contribution
margin of $24, or 2 units of Product 2, each
with a contribution margin of $15.
2 × $15 = $30 > $24
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
The key is the contribution margin per unit of the
constrained resource.
Product 2 should be emphasized.Product 2 should be emphasized. Provides moreProvides more
valuable use of the constrained resource machine A1,valuable use of the constrained resource machine A1,
yielding a contribution margin of $30 per minute asyielding a contribution margin of $30 per minute as
opposed to $24 for Product 1.opposed to $24 for Product 1.
Product 2 should be emphasized.Product 2 should be emphasized. Provides moreProvides more
valuable use of the constrained resource machine A1,valuable use of the constrained resource machine A1,
yielding a contribution margin of $30 per minute asyielding a contribution margin of $30 per minute as
opposed to $24 for Product 1.opposed to $24 for Product 1.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
If there are no other considerations, the bestIf there are no other considerations, the best
plan would be to produce to meet currentplan would be to produce to meet current
demand for Product 2 and then use remainingdemand for Product 2 and then use remaining
capacity to make Product 1.capacity to make Product 1.
If there are no other considerations, the bestIf there are no other considerations, the best
plan would be to produce to meet currentplan would be to produce to meet current
demand for Product 2 and then use remainingdemand for Product 2 and then use remaining
capacity to make Product 1.capacity to make Product 1.
The key is the contribution margin per unit of the
constrained resource.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
Let’s see how this plan would work.Let’s see how this plan would work.
Alloting Our Constrained Resource (Machine A1)
Weekly demand for Product 2 2,200 units
Time required per unit × 0.50 min.
Total time required to make
Product 2 1,100 min.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Alloting Our Constrained Resource (Machine A1)
Weekly demand for Product 2 2,200 units
Time required per unit × 0.50 min.
Total time required to make
Product 2 1,100 min.
Total time available 2,400 min.
Time used to make Product 2 1,100 min.
Time available for Product 1 1,300 min.
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
Let’s see how this plan would work.Let’s see how this plan would work.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
Let’s see how this plan would work.Let’s see how this plan would work.
Alloting Our Constrained Resource (Machine A1)
Weekly demand for Product 2 2,200 units
Time required per unit × 0.50 min.
Total time required to make
Product 2 1,100 min.
Total time available 2,400 min.
Time used to make Product 2 1,100 min.
Time available for Product 1 1,300 min.
Time required per unit ÷ 1.00 min.
Production of Product 1 1,300 units
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Utilization of a Constrained Resource
According to the plan, we will produce 2,200 unitsAccording to the plan, we will produce 2,200 units
of Product 2 and 1,300 of Product 1. Ourof Product 2 and 1,300 of Product 1. Our
contribution margin looks like this.contribution margin looks like this.
Product 1 Product 2
Production and sales (units) 1,300 2,200
Contribution margin per unit 24$ 15$
Total contribution margin 31,200$ 33,000$
The total contribution margin for Ensign is $64,200.The total contribution margin for Ensign is $64,200.The total contribution margin for Ensign is $64,200.The total contribution margin for Ensign is $64,200.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Quick Check 
Colonial Heritage makes reproduction colonialColonial Heritage makes reproduction colonial
furniture from select hardwoods.furniture from select hardwoods.
The company’s supplier of hardwood will only beThe company’s supplier of hardwood will only be
able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Is thisable to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Is this
enough hardwood to satisfy demand?enough hardwood to satisfy demand?
a. Yesa. Yes
b. Nob. No
Chairs Tables
Selling price per unit $80 $400
Variable cost per unit $30 $200
Board feet per unit 2 10
Monthly demand 600 100
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Colonial Heritage makes reproduction colonialColonial Heritage makes reproduction colonial
furniture from select hardwoods.furniture from select hardwoods.
The company’s supplier of hardwood will only beThe company’s supplier of hardwood will only be
able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Is thisable to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Is this
enough hardwood to satisfy demand?enough hardwood to satisfy demand?
a. Yesa. Yes
b. Nob. No
Quick Check 
(2 × 600) + (10 × 100 ) = 2,200 > 2,000(2 × 600) + (10 × 100 ) = 2,200 > 2,000
Chairs Tables
Selling price per unit $80 $400
Variable cost per unit $30 $200
Board feet per unit 2 10
Monthly demand 600 100
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Quick Check 
The company’s supplier of hardwood will onlyThe company’s supplier of hardwood will only
be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month.be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month.
What plan would maximize profits?What plan would maximize profits?
a. 500 chairs and 100 tablesa. 500 chairs and 100 tables
b. 600 chairs and 80 tablesb. 600 chairs and 80 tables
c. 500 chairs and 80 tablesc. 500 chairs and 80 tables
d. 600 chairs and 100 tablesd. 600 chairs and 100 tables
Chairs Tables
Selling price per unit $80 $400
Variable cost per unit $30 $200
Board feet per unit 2 10
Monthly demand 600 100
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The company’s supplier of hardwood will onlyThe company’s supplier of hardwood will only
be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month.be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month.
What plan would maximize profits?What plan would maximize profits?
a. 500 chairs and 100 tablesa. 500 chairs and 100 tables
b. 600 chairs and 80 tablesb. 600 chairs and 80 tables
c. 500 chairs and 80 tablesc. 500 chairs and 80 tables
d. 600 chairs and 100 tablesd. 600 chairs and 100 tables
Quick Check 
Chairs Tables
Selling price per unit $80 $400
Variable cost per unit $30 $200
Board feet per unit 2 10
Monthly demand 600 100
Chairs Tables
Selling price 80$ 400$
Variable cost 30 200
Contribution margin 50$ 200$
Board feet 2 10
CM per board foot 25$ 20$
Production of chairs 600
Board feet required 1,200
Board feet remaining 800
Board feet per table 10
Production of tables 80
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Quick Check 
As before, Colonial Heritage’s supplier of
hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000
board feet this month. Assume the company
follows the plan we have proposed. Up to how
much should Colonial Heritage be willing to pay
above the usual price to obtain more hardwood?
a. $40 per board foot
b. $25 per board foot
c. $20 per board foot
d. Zero
As before, Colonial Heritage’s supplier of
hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000
board feet this month. Assume the company
follows the plan we have proposed. Up to how
much should Colonial Heritage be willing to pay
above the usual price to obtain more hardwood?
a. $40 per board foot
b. $25 per board foot
c. $20 per board foot
d. Zero
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
As before, Colonial Heritage’s supplier of
hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000
board feet this month. Assume the company
follows the plan we have proposed. Up to how
much should Colonial Heritage be willing to pay
above the usual price to obtain more hardwood?
a. $40 per board foot
b. $25 per board foot
c. $20 per board foot
d. Zero
As before, Colonial Heritage’s supplier of
hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000
board feet this month. Assume the company
follows the plan we have proposed. Up to how
much should Colonial Heritage be willing to pay
above the usual price to obtain more hardwood?
a. $40 per board foot
b. $25 per board foot
c. $20 per board foot
d. Zero
Quick Check 
The additional wood would be used to make
tables. In this use, each board foot of
additional wood will allow the company to earn
an additional $20 of contribution margin and
profit.
The additional wood would be used to make
tables. In this use, each board foot of
additional wood will allow the company to earn
an additional $20 of contribution margin and
profit.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Managing Constraints
Finding ways to
process more units
through a resource
bottleneck
At the bottleneck itself:At the bottleneck itself:
• Improve the processImprove the process
• Add overtime or another shiftAdd overtime or another shift
• Hire new workers or acquireHire new workers or acquire
more machinesmore machines
• Subcontract productionSubcontract production
• Reduce amount of defectiveReduce amount of defective
units producedunits produced
• Add workers transferred fromAdd workers transferred from
non-bottleneck departmentsnon-bottleneck departments
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Joint Costs
• In some industries, a number of end
products are produced from a single raw
material input.
• Two or more products produced from a
common input are called joint productsjoint products.
• The point in the manufacturing process
where each joint product can be
recognized as a separate product is
called the split-off pointsplit-off point.
• In some industries, a number of end
products are produced from a single raw
material input.
• Two or more products produced from a
common input are called joint productsjoint products.
• The point in the manufacturing process
where each joint product can be
recognized as a separate product is
called the split-off pointsplit-off point.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Joint Products
Joint
Input
Common
Production
Process
Split-OffSplit-Off
PointPoint
Oil
Gasoline
Chemicals
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Joint Products
Separate
Processing
Separate
Processing
Final
Sale
Final
Sale
Final
Sale
SeparateSeparate
ProductProduct
CostsCosts
Joint
Input
Common
Production
Process
Split-OffSplit-Off
PointPoint
JointJoint
CostsCosts Oil
Gasoline
Chemicals
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Pitfalls of Allocation
Joint costs are oftenJoint costs are often
allocated to end products onallocated to end products on
the basis of thethe basis of the relativerelative
sales valuesales value of each productof each product
or on some other basis.or on some other basis.
Although allocation is needed forAlthough allocation is needed for
some purposes such as balancesome purposes such as balance
sheet inventory valuation,sheet inventory valuation,
allocations of this kind areallocations of this kind are veryvery
dangerousdangerous for decision making.for decision making.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Joint costs are irrelevant in decisionsJoint costs are irrelevant in decisions
regarding what to do with a product from theregarding what to do with a product from the
split-off point forward.split-off point forward.
It will always be profitable to continueIt will always be profitable to continue
processing a joint product after the split-offprocessing a joint product after the split-off
pointpoint so long as the incremental revenueso long as the incremental revenue
exceeds the incremental processing costsexceeds the incremental processing costs
incurred after the split-off pointincurred after the split-off point..
Sell or Process Further
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Sell or Process Further: An Example
• Sawmill, Inc. cuts logs from which unfinishedSawmill, Inc. cuts logs from which unfinished
lumber and sawdust are the immediate jointlumber and sawdust are the immediate joint
products.products.
• Unfinished lumber is sold “as is” or processedUnfinished lumber is sold “as is” or processed
further into finished lumber.further into finished lumber.
• Sawdust can also be sold “as is” to gardeningSawdust can also be sold “as is” to gardening
wholesalers or processed further into “presto-wholesalers or processed further into “presto-
logs.”logs.”
• Sawmill, Inc. cuts logs from which unfinishedSawmill, Inc. cuts logs from which unfinished
lumber and sawdust are the immediate jointlumber and sawdust are the immediate joint
products.products.
• Unfinished lumber is sold “as is” or processedUnfinished lumber is sold “as is” or processed
further into finished lumber.further into finished lumber.
• Sawdust can also be sold “as is” to gardeningSawdust can also be sold “as is” to gardening
wholesalers or processed further into “presto-wholesalers or processed further into “presto-
logs.”logs.”
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Sell or Process Further
Data about Sawmill’s joint products includes:
Per Log
Lumber Sawdust
Sales value at the split-off point 140$ 40$
Sales value after further processing 270 50
Allocated joint product costs 176 24
Cost of further processing 50 20
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Sell or Process Further
Analysis of Sell or Process Further
Per Log
Lumber Sawdust
Sales value after further processing 270$ 50$
Sales value at the split-off point 140 40
Incremental revenue 130 10
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Sell or Process Further
Analysis of Sell or Process Further
Per Log
Lumber Sawdust
Sales value after further processing 270$ 50$
Sales value at the split-off point 140 40
Incremental revenue 130 10
Cost of further processing 50 20
Profit (loss) from further processing 80$ (10)$
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Analysis of Sell or Process Further
Per Log
Lumber Sawdust
Sales value after further processing 270$ 50$
Sales value at the split-off point 140 40
Incremental revenue 130 10
Cost of further processing 50 20
Profit (loss) from further processing 80$ (10)$
Sell or Process Further
Should we process the lumber furtherShould we process the lumber further
and sell the sawdust “as is?”and sell the sawdust “as is?”
Should we process the lumber furtherShould we process the lumber further
and sell the sawdust “as is?”and sell the sawdust “as is?”
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Activity-Based Costing and RelevantActivity-Based Costing and Relevant
CostsCosts
ABC can be used to help identify potentially
relevant costs for decision-making purposes.
However, before making a
decision, managers must
decide which of the
potentially relevant costs are
actually avoidable.
Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin
End of Chapter 13End of Chapter 13

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Cost Behavior Analysis
Cost Behavior AnalysisCost Behavior Analysis
Cost Behavior AnalysisJhOnie JhOan
 
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 05
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 05Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 05
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 05Asif Hasan
 
Chapter 6 Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
Chapter 6 Cost-Volume-Profit RelationshipsChapter 6 Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
Chapter 6 Cost-Volume-Profit RelationshipsViệt Hoàng Dương
 
A presentation on process costing
A presentation on process costingA presentation on process costing
A presentation on process costingPRIYANKAVP4
 
Chapter 5 : Relevant Costing For Decision Making
Chapter 5 : Relevant Costing For Decision MakingChapter 5 : Relevant Costing For Decision Making
Chapter 5 : Relevant Costing For Decision MakingPeleZain
 
| Managerial Accounting | Chapter 4 | Systems Design: Process Costing | Intro...
| Managerial Accounting | Chapter 4 | Systems Design: Process Costing | Intro...| Managerial Accounting | Chapter 4 | Systems Design: Process Costing | Intro...
| Managerial Accounting | Chapter 4 | Systems Design: Process Costing | Intro...Ahmad Hassan
 
Paper 8 cost accounting & financial management - june-2015
Paper 8   cost accounting & financial management - june-2015Paper 8   cost accounting & financial management - june-2015
Paper 8 cost accounting & financial management - june-2015Jaipal P
 
Flexible budgets and performance analysis
Flexible budgets and performance analysisFlexible budgets and performance analysis
Flexible budgets and performance analysisOnline
 
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 01
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 01Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 01
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 01Asif Hasan
 
Activity Based Costing
Activity Based CostingActivity Based Costing
Activity Based CostingVikas Gupta
 
Standard costs and variance analysis
Standard costs and variance analysisStandard costs and variance analysis
Standard costs and variance analysisSumit Malhotra
 
Managerial Accounting Tools for Business Decision Making 6th Edition Weygandt...
Managerial Accounting Tools for Business Decision Making 6th Edition Weygandt...Managerial Accounting Tools for Business Decision Making 6th Edition Weygandt...
Managerial Accounting Tools for Business Decision Making 6th Edition Weygandt...nenoliruzu
 
Cost accounting case study on LAMBETH CUSTOM CABINETS
Cost accounting case study on LAMBETH CUSTOM CABINETSCost accounting case study on LAMBETH CUSTOM CABINETS
Cost accounting case study on LAMBETH CUSTOM CABINETSRishabh Seth
 
Absorption costing vs variable costing
Absorption costing  vs variable costingAbsorption costing  vs variable costing
Absorption costing vs variable costingShankar Jyoti Doley
 
6. Cost Volume-Profit Analysis
6. Cost Volume-Profit Analysis6. Cost Volume-Profit Analysis
6. Cost Volume-Profit AnalysisLeonardo Figueroa
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Cost Behavior Analysis
Cost Behavior AnalysisCost Behavior Analysis
Cost Behavior Analysis
 
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 05
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 05Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 05
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 05
 
Chapter 6 Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
Chapter 6 Cost-Volume-Profit RelationshipsChapter 6 Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
Chapter 6 Cost-Volume-Profit Relationships
 
A presentation on process costing
A presentation on process costingA presentation on process costing
A presentation on process costing
 
Chapter 5 : Relevant Costing For Decision Making
Chapter 5 : Relevant Costing For Decision MakingChapter 5 : Relevant Costing For Decision Making
Chapter 5 : Relevant Costing For Decision Making
 
Process costing
Process costingProcess costing
Process costing
 
| Managerial Accounting | Chapter 4 | Systems Design: Process Costing | Intro...
| Managerial Accounting | Chapter 4 | Systems Design: Process Costing | Intro...| Managerial Accounting | Chapter 4 | Systems Design: Process Costing | Intro...
| Managerial Accounting | Chapter 4 | Systems Design: Process Costing | Intro...
 
Paper 8 cost accounting & financial management - june-2015
Paper 8   cost accounting & financial management - june-2015Paper 8   cost accounting & financial management - june-2015
Paper 8 cost accounting & financial management - june-2015
 
Cost volume-profit relationship
Cost volume-profit relationshipCost volume-profit relationship
Cost volume-profit relationship
 
Variance Analysis
Variance AnalysisVariance Analysis
Variance Analysis
 
Flexible budgets and performance analysis
Flexible budgets and performance analysisFlexible budgets and performance analysis
Flexible budgets and performance analysis
 
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 01
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 01Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 01
Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 01
 
Activity Based Costing
Activity Based CostingActivity Based Costing
Activity Based Costing
 
Marginal costing
Marginal costing Marginal costing
Marginal costing
 
Standard costs and variance analysis
Standard costs and variance analysisStandard costs and variance analysis
Standard costs and variance analysis
 
Managerial Accounting Tools for Business Decision Making 6th Edition Weygandt...
Managerial Accounting Tools for Business Decision Making 6th Edition Weygandt...Managerial Accounting Tools for Business Decision Making 6th Edition Weygandt...
Managerial Accounting Tools for Business Decision Making 6th Edition Weygandt...
 
Cost accounting case study on LAMBETH CUSTOM CABINETS
Cost accounting case study on LAMBETH CUSTOM CABINETSCost accounting case study on LAMBETH CUSTOM CABINETS
Cost accounting case study on LAMBETH CUSTOM CABINETS
 
Absorption costing vs variable costing
Absorption costing  vs variable costingAbsorption costing  vs variable costing
Absorption costing vs variable costing
 
Cost behavior
Cost behaviorCost behavior
Cost behavior
 
6. Cost Volume-Profit Analysis
6. Cost Volume-Profit Analysis6. Cost Volume-Profit Analysis
6. Cost Volume-Profit Analysis
 

Ähnlich wie Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 13

Costi decisionali - 1. Costi pertinenti a processi decisionali
Costi decisionali - 1. Costi pertinenti a processi decisionali Costi decisionali - 1. Costi pertinenti a processi decisionali
Costi decisionali - 1. Costi pertinenti a processi decisionali Manager.it
 
chap13notes.pdf
chap13notes.pdfchap13notes.pdf
chap13notes.pdfEllamae79
 
differential analysis.pptx
differential analysis.pptxdifferential analysis.pptx
differential analysis.pptxKevin M. Wright
 
act202_chapter_12.pptx
act202_chapter_12.pptxact202_chapter_12.pptx
act202_chapter_12.pptxssuserbea996
 
Relevant cost for decision making.ppt
Relevant cost for decision making.pptRelevant cost for decision making.ppt
Relevant cost for decision making.pptssuser4e871f
 
Differential Analysis The Key to Decision MakingChapter 12.docx
Differential Analysis The Key to Decision MakingChapter 12.docxDifferential Analysis The Key to Decision MakingChapter 12.docx
Differential Analysis The Key to Decision MakingChapter 12.docxlynettearnold46882
 
Acc mgt noreen11 relevant costs for decision making
Acc mgt noreen11 relevant costs for decision makingAcc mgt noreen11 relevant costs for decision making
Acc mgt noreen11 relevant costs for decision makingJudianto Nugroho
 
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one ppt
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one pptThe economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one ppt
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one pptBrittany Fowler
 
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one ppt
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one pptThe economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one ppt
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one pptBrittany Fowler
 
Final Moodys Challenge2
Final Moodys Challenge2Final Moodys Challenge2
Final Moodys Challenge2Eric Jiang
 
Final Economic Proposal for RYNO Bike
Final Economic Proposal for RYNO BikeFinal Economic Proposal for RYNO Bike
Final Economic Proposal for RYNO BikeJulie Bentley
 
Household transportation cost management
Household transportation cost managementHousehold transportation cost management
Household transportation cost managementA.W. Berry
 

Ähnlich wie Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 13 (18)

Gnb 13 12e
Gnb 13 12eGnb 13 12e
Gnb 13 12e
 
Costi decisionali - 1. Costi pertinenti a processi decisionali
Costi decisionali - 1. Costi pertinenti a processi decisionali Costi decisionali - 1. Costi pertinenti a processi decisionali
Costi decisionali - 1. Costi pertinenti a processi decisionali
 
chap13notes.pdf
chap13notes.pdfchap13notes.pdf
chap13notes.pdf
 
differential analysis.pptx
differential analysis.pptxdifferential analysis.pptx
differential analysis.pptx
 
CH11_I.pdf
CH11_I.pdfCH11_I.pdf
CH11_I.pdf
 
act202_chapter_12.pptx
act202_chapter_12.pptxact202_chapter_12.pptx
act202_chapter_12.pptx
 
Relevant cost for decision making.ppt
Relevant cost for decision making.pptRelevant cost for decision making.ppt
Relevant cost for decision making.ppt
 
Differential Analysis The Key to Decision MakingChapter 12.docx
Differential Analysis The Key to Decision MakingChapter 12.docxDifferential Analysis The Key to Decision MakingChapter 12.docx
Differential Analysis The Key to Decision MakingChapter 12.docx
 
Vehicle Finance
Vehicle Finance Vehicle Finance
Vehicle Finance
 
Cars on the Go - Project
Cars on the Go - ProjectCars on the Go - Project
Cars on the Go - Project
 
Acc mgt noreen11 relevant costs for decision making
Acc mgt noreen11 relevant costs for decision makingAcc mgt noreen11 relevant costs for decision making
Acc mgt noreen11 relevant costs for decision making
 
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one ppt
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one pptThe economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one ppt
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one ppt
 
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one ppt
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one pptThe economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one ppt
The economics of sharecars compared to individually owning one ppt
 
Grey fleet rant
Grey fleet rant Grey fleet rant
Grey fleet rant
 
Final Moodys Challenge2
Final Moodys Challenge2Final Moodys Challenge2
Final Moodys Challenge2
 
Final Economic Proposal for RYNO Bike
Final Economic Proposal for RYNO BikeFinal Economic Proposal for RYNO Bike
Final Economic Proposal for RYNO Bike
 
Household transportation cost management
Household transportation cost managementHousehold transportation cost management
Household transportation cost management
 
Webpubpaper1
Webpubpaper1Webpubpaper1
Webpubpaper1
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...JhezDiaz1
 
FILIPINO PSYCHology sikolohiyang pilipino
FILIPINO PSYCHology sikolohiyang pilipinoFILIPINO PSYCHology sikolohiyang pilipino
FILIPINO PSYCHology sikolohiyang pilipinojohnmickonozaleda
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...Postal Advocate Inc.
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxthorishapillay1
 
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxBarangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxCarlos105
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Jisc
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYKayeClaireEstoconing
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxHumphrey A Beña
 
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptxKarra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptxAshokKarra1
 
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomnelietumpap1
 
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17Celine George
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfphamnguyenenglishnb
 
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemChristalin Nelson
 
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfVirtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfErwinPantujan2
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatYousafMalik24
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designMIPLM
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
 
FILIPINO PSYCHology sikolohiyang pilipino
FILIPINO PSYCHology sikolohiyang pilipinoFILIPINO PSYCHology sikolohiyang pilipino
FILIPINO PSYCHology sikolohiyang pilipino
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
 
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxBarangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
 
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptxKarra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
 
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choomENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
ENGLISH6-Q4-W3.pptxqurter our high choom
 
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptxRaw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
Raw materials used in Herbal Cosmetics.pptx
 
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
How to Add Barcode on PDF Report in Odoo 17
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
 
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management System
 
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdfVirtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
Virtual-Orientation-on-the-Administration-of-NATG12-NATG6-and-ELLNA.pdf
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
 

Managerial Accounting Garrison Noreen Brewer Chapter 13

  • 1. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin 11th Edition Chapter 13
  • 2. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Relevant Costs for Decision Making Chapter Thirteen
  • 3. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Cost Concepts for Decision Making A relevant cost is a cost that differs between alternatives. 1 2
  • 4. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Identifying Relevant Costs An avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole orAn avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole or in part) by choosing one alternative overin part) by choosing one alternative over another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs.another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs. Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs.Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs. Two broad categories of costs are neverTwo broad categories of costs are never relevant in any decision and include:relevant in any decision and include: Sunk costs.Sunk costs. Future costs thatFuture costs that do not differdo not differ between thebetween the alternatives.alternatives. An avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole orAn avoidable cost can be eliminated (in whole or in part) by choosing one alternative overin part) by choosing one alternative over another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs.another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs. Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs.Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs. Two broad categories of costs are neverTwo broad categories of costs are never relevant in any decision and include:relevant in any decision and include: Sunk costs.Sunk costs. Future costs thatFuture costs that do not differdo not differ between thebetween the alternatives.alternatives.
  • 5. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Relevant Cost Analysis: A Two-Step Process Eliminate costs and benefits that do not differ between alternatives. Use the remaining costs and benefits that do differ between alternatives in making the decision. The costs that remain are the differential, or avoidable, costs. Step 1 Step 2
  • 6. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Different Costs for Different Purposes Costs that are relevant in one decision situation may not be relevant in another context.
  • 7. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Identifying Relevant Costs Annual Cost of Fixed Items Cost per Mile 1 Annual straight-line depreciation on car 2,800$ 0.280$ 2 Cost of gasoline 0.050 3 Annual cost of auto insurance and license 1,380 0.138 4 Maintenance and repairs 0.065 5 Parking fees at school 360 0.036 6 Total average cost 0.569$ Automobile Costs (based on 10,000 miles driven per year) Cynthia, a Boston student, is considering visiting her friend in New York.Cynthia, a Boston student, is considering visiting her friend in New York. She can drive or take the train. By car it is 230 miles to her friend’sShe can drive or take the train. By car it is 230 miles to her friend’s apartment. She is trying to decide which alternative is less expensiveapartment. She is trying to decide which alternative is less expensive and has gathered the following information:and has gathered the following information: Cynthia, a Boston student, is considering visiting her friend in New York.Cynthia, a Boston student, is considering visiting her friend in New York. She can drive or take the train. By car it is 230 miles to her friend’sShe can drive or take the train. By car it is 230 miles to her friend’s apartment. She is trying to decide which alternative is less expensiveapartment. She is trying to decide which alternative is less expensive and has gathered the following information:and has gathered the following information: $45 per month$45 per month × 8 months× 8 months$45 per month$45 per month × 8 months× 8 months $1.60 per gallon ÷ 32 MPG$1.60 per gallon ÷ 32 MPG $18,000 cost$18,000 cost –– $4,000 salvage value$4,000 salvage value ÷ 5 years÷ 5 years$18,000 cost$18,000 cost –– $4,000 salvage value$4,000 salvage value ÷ 5 years÷ 5 years
  • 8. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Identifying Relevant Costs 7 Reduction in resale value of car per mile of wear 0.026$ 8 Round-tip train fare 104$ 9 Benefits of relaxing on train trip ???? 10 Cost of putting dog in kennel while gone 40$ 11 Benefit of having car in New York ???? 12 Hassle of parking car in New York ???? 13 Per day cost of parking car in New York 25$ Some Additional Information Annual Cost of Fixed Items Cost per Mile 1 Annual straight-line depreciation on car 2,800$ 0.280$ 2 Cost of gasoline 0.050 3 Annual cost of auto insurance and license 1,380 0.138 4 Maintenance and repairs 0.065 5 Parking fees at school 360 0.036 6 Total average cost 0.569$ Automobile Costs (based on 10,000 miles driven per year)
  • 9. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Identifying Relevant Costs Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’sWhich costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s decision?decision? Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’sWhich costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s decision?decision? The cost of the car is a sunk cost and is not relevant to the current decision. The cost of the car is a sunk cost and is not relevant to the current decision. However, the cost of gasoline is clearly relevant if she decides to drive. If she takes the drive the cost would now be incurred, so it varies depending on the decision. However, the cost of gasoline is clearly relevant if she decides to drive. If she takes the drive the cost would now be incurred, so it varies depending on the decision. The annual cost of insurance is not relevant. It will remain the same if she drives or takes the train. The annual cost of insurance is not relevant. It will remain the same if she drives or takes the train.
  • 10. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Identifying Relevant Costs Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s decision? Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s decision? The cost of maintenance and repairs is relevant. In the long-run these costs depend upon miles driven. The cost of maintenance and repairs is relevant. In the long-run these costs depend upon miles driven. The monthly school parking fee is not relevant because it must be paid if Cynthia drives or takes the train. The monthly school parking fee is not relevant because it must be paid if Cynthia drives or takes the train. At this point, we can see that some of the average cost of $0.569 per mile are relevant and others are not. At this point, we can see that some of the average cost of $0.569 per mile are relevant and others are not.
  • 11. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Identifying Relevant Costs Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s decision? Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s decision? The decline in resale value due to additional miles is a relevant cost. The decline in resale value due to additional miles is a relevant cost. The round-trip train fare is clearly relevant. If she drives the cost can be avoided. The round-trip train fare is clearly relevant. If she drives the cost can be avoided. Relaxing on the train is relevant even though it is difficult to assign a dollar value to the benefit. Relaxing on the train is relevant even though it is difficult to assign a dollar value to the benefit. The kennel cost is not relevant because Cynthia will incur the cost if she drives or takes the train. The kennel cost is not relevant because Cynthia will incur the cost if she drives or takes the train.
  • 12. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Identifying Relevant Costs Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s decision? Which costs and benefits are relevant in Cynthia’s decision? The cost of parking is relevant because it can be avoided if she takes the train. The cost of parking is relevant because it can be avoided if she takes the train. The benefits of having a car in New York and the problems of finding a parking space are both relevant but are difficult to assign a dollar amount. The benefits of having a car in New York and the problems of finding a parking space are both relevant but are difficult to assign a dollar amount.
  • 13. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Identifying Relevant Costs From a financial standpoint, Cynthia would be better off taking the train to visit her friend. Some of the non-financial factor may influence her final decision. From a financial standpoint, Cynthia would be better off taking the train to visit her friend. Some of the non-financial factor may influence her final decision. Gasoline (460 @ $0.050 per mile) 23.00$ Maintenance (460 @ $0.065 per mile) 29.90 Reduction in resale (460 @ $0.026 per mile) 11.96 Parking in New York (2 days @ $25 per day) 50.00 Total 114.86$ Relevant Financial Cost of Driving Round-trip ticket 104.00$ Relevant Financial Cost of Taking the Train
  • 14. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Total and Differential Cost Approaches The management of a company is considering a new laborsaving machine that rents for $3,000 per year. Data about the company’s annual sales and costs with and without the new machine are: Current Situation Situation With New Machine Differential Costs and Benefits Sales (5,000 units @ $40 per unit) 200,000$ 200,000$ - Less variable expenses: Direct materials (5,000 units @ $14 per unit) 70,000 70,000 - Direct labor (5,000 units @ $8 and $5 per unit) 40,000 25,000 15,000 Variable overhead (5,000 units @ $2 per unit) 10,000 10,000 - Total variable expenses 120,000 105,000 - Contribution margin 80,000 95,000 15,000 Less fixed expense: Other 62,000 62,000 - Rent on new machine - 3,000 (3,000) Total fixed expenses 62,000 65,000 (3,000) Net operating income 18,000$ 30,000$ 12,000
  • 15. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Total and Differential Cost Approaches Current Situation Situation With New Machine Differential Costs and Benefits Sales (5,000 units @ $40 per unit) 200,000$ 200,000$ - Less variable expenses: Direct materials (5,000 units @ $14 per unit) 70,000 70,000 - Direct labor (5,000 units @ $8 and $5 per unit) 40,000 25,000 15,000 Variable overhead (5,000 units @ $2 per unit) 10,000 10,000 - Total variable expenses 120,000 105,000 - Contribution margin 80,000 95,000 15,000 Less fixed expense: Other 62,000 62,000 - Rent on new machine - 3,000 (3,000) Total fixed expenses 62,000 65,000 (3,000) Net operating income 18,000$ 30,000$ 12,000 As you see, the only costs that differ between the alternatives are the direct labor costs savings and the increase in fixed rental costs. We can efficiently analyze the decision by looking at the different costs and revenues and arrive at the same solution. We can efficiently analyze the decision by looking at the different costs and revenues and arrive at the same solution. Decrease in direct labor costs (5,000 units @ $3 per unit) 15,000$ Increase in fixed rental expenses (3,000) Net annual cost saving from renting the new machine 12,000$ Net Advantage to Renting the New Machine
  • 16. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Total and Differential Cost Approaches Using the differential approach is desirable for two reasons: 1. Only rarely will enough information be available to prepare detailed income statements for both alternatives. 2. Mingling irrelevant costs with relevant costs may cause confusion and distract attention away from the information that is really critical.
  • 17. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Adding/Dropping Segments One of the most important decisions managers make is whether to add or drop a business segment such as a product or a store. Let’s see how relevant costs shouldLet’s see how relevant costs should be used in this type of decision.be used in this type of decision. One of the most important decisions managers make is whether to add or drop a business segment such as a product or a store. Let’s see how relevant costs shouldLet’s see how relevant costs should be used in this type of decision.be used in this type of decision.
  • 18. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Adding/Dropping Segments Due to the declining popularity of digitalDue to the declining popularity of digital watches, Lovell Company’s digitalwatches, Lovell Company’s digital watch line has not reported a profit forwatch line has not reported a profit for several years. Lovell is consideringseveral years. Lovell is considering dropping this product line.dropping this product line. Due to the declining popularity of digitalDue to the declining popularity of digital watches, Lovell Company’s digitalwatches, Lovell Company’s digital watch line has not reported a profit forwatch line has not reported a profit for several years. Lovell is consideringseveral years. Lovell is considering dropping this product line.dropping this product line.
  • 19. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin A Contribution Margin Approach DECISION RULE Lovell should drop the digital watch segment only if its profit would increase. This would only happen if the fixed cost savings exceed the lost contribution margin. Let’s look at this solution. DECISION RULE Lovell should drop the digital watch segment only if its profit would increase. This would only happen if the fixed cost savings exceed the lost contribution margin. Let’s look at this solution.
  • 20. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Adding/Dropping Segments Segment Income Statement Digital Watches Sales 500,000$ Less: variable expenses Variable manufacturing costs 120,000$ Variable shipping costs 5,000 Commissions 75,000 200,000 Contribution margin 300,000$ Less: fixed expenses General factory overhead 60,000$ Salary of line manager 90,000 Depreciation of equipment 50,000 Advertising - direct 100,000 Rent - factory space 70,000 General admin. expenses 30,000 400,000 Net operating loss (100,000)$
  • 21. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Segment Income Statement Digital Watches Sales 500,000$ Less: variable expenses Variable manufacuring costs 120,000$ Variable shipping costs 5,000 Commissions 75,000 200,000 Contribution margin 300,000$ Less: fixed expenses General factory overhead 60,000$ Salary of line manager 90,000 Depreciation of equipment 50,000 Advertising - direct 100,000 Rent - factory space 70,000 General admin. expenses 30,000 400,000 Net operating loss (100,000)$ Adding/Dropping Segments Investigation has revealed thatInvestigation has revealed that total fixed generaltotal fixed general factory overheadfactory overhead andand generalgeneral administrative expensesadministrative expenses would not be affected ifwould not be affected if the digital watch line is dropped. The fixedthe digital watch line is dropped. The fixed general factory overhead and generalgeneral factory overhead and general administrative expenses assigned to this productadministrative expenses assigned to this product would be reallocated to other product lines.would be reallocated to other product lines. Investigation has revealed thatInvestigation has revealed that total fixed generaltotal fixed general factory overheadfactory overhead andand generalgeneral administrative expensesadministrative expenses would not be affected ifwould not be affected if the digital watch line is dropped. The fixedthe digital watch line is dropped. The fixed general factory overhead and generalgeneral factory overhead and general administrative expenses assigned to this productadministrative expenses assigned to this product would be reallocated to other product lines.would be reallocated to other product lines.
  • 22. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Adding/Dropping Segments Segment Income Statement Digital Watches Sales 500,000$ Less: variable expenses Variable manufacturing costs 120,000$ Variable shipping costs 5,000 Commissions 75,000 200,000 Contribution margin 300,000$ Less: fixed expenses General factory overhead 60,000$ Salary of line manager 90,000 Depreciation of equipment 50,000 Advertising - direct 100,000 Rent - factory space 70,000 General admin. expenses 30,000 400,000 Net operating loss (100,000)$ The equipment used to manufactureThe equipment used to manufacture digital watches has no resaledigital watches has no resale value or alternative use.value or alternative use. The equipment used to manufactureThe equipment used to manufacture digital watches has no resaledigital watches has no resale value or alternative use.value or alternative use. Should Lovell retain or drop the digital watch segment? Should Lovell retain or drop the digital watch segment?
  • 23. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin A Contribution Margin Approach Contribution Margin Solution Contribution margin lost if digital watches are dropped (300,000)$ Less fixed costs that can be avoided Salary of the line manager 90,000$ Advertising - direct 100,000 Rent - factory space 70,000 260,000 Net disadvantage (40,000)$
  • 24. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Comparative Income Approach The Lovell solution can also be obtained by preparing comparative income statements showing results with and without the digital watch segment. Let’s look at this second approach.Let’s look at this second approach. The Lovell solution can also be obtained by preparing comparative income statements showing results with and without the digital watch segment. Let’s look at this second approach.Let’s look at this second approach.
  • 25. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Comparative Income Approach Solution Keep Digital Watches Drop Digital Watches Difference Sales 500,000$ -$ (500,000)$ Less variable expenses: - Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000 Shipping 5,000 - 5,000 Commissions 75,000 - 75,000 Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000 Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000) Less fixed expenses: General factory overhead 60,000 Salary of line manager 90,000 Depreciation 50,000 Advertising - direct 100,000 Rent - factory space 70,000 General admin. expenses 30,000 Total fixed expenses 400,000 Net operating loss (100,000)$ If the digital watch line is dropped, the company gives up its contribution margin. If the digital watch line is dropped, the company gives up its contribution margin.
  • 26. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Comparative Income Approach Solution Keep Digital Watches Drop Digital Watches Difference Sales 500,000$ -$ (500,000)$ Less variable expenses: - Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000 Shipping 5,000 - 5,000 Commissions 75,000 - 75,000 Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000 Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000) Less fixed expenses: General factory overhead 60,000 60,000 - Salary of line manager 90,000 Depreciation 50,000 Advertising - direct 100,000 Rent - factory space 70,000 General admin. expenses 30,000 Total fixed expenses 400,000 Net operating loss (100,000)$ On the other hand, the general factory overhead would be the same. So this cost really isn’t relevant. On the other hand, the general factory overhead would be the same. So this cost really isn’t relevant.
  • 27. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Comparative Income Approach Solution Keep Digital Watches Drop Digital Watches Difference Sales 500,000$ -$ (500,000)$ Less variable expenses: - Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000 Shipping 5,000 - 5,000 Commissions 75,000 - 75,000 Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000 Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000) Less fixed expenses: General factory overhead 60,000 60,000 - Salary of line manager 90,000 - 90,000 Depreciation 50,000 Advertising - direct 100,000 Rent - factory space 70,000 General admin. expenses 30,000 Total fixed expenses 400,000 Net operating loss (100,000)$ But we wouldn’t need a manager for the product line anymore. But we wouldn’t need a manager for the product line anymore.
  • 28. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Comparative Income Approach Solution Keep Digital Watches Drop Digital Watches Difference Sales 500,000$ -$ (500,000)$ Less variable expenses: - Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000 Shipping 5,000 - 5,000 Commissions 75,000 - 75,000 Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000 Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000) Less fixed expenses: General factory overhead 60,000 60,000 - Salary of line manager 90,000 - 90,000 Depreciation 50,000 50,000 - Advertising - direct 100,000 Rent - factory space 70,000 General admin. expenses 30,000 Total fixed expenses 400,000 Net operating loss (100,000)$ If the digital watch line is dropped, the net book value of the equipment would be written off. The depreciation that would have been taken will flow through the income statement as a loss instead. If the digital watch line is dropped, the net book value of the equipment would be written off. The depreciation that would have been taken will flow through the income statement as a loss instead.
  • 29. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Comparative Income Approach Solution Keep Digital Watches Drop Digital Watches Difference Sales 500,000$ -$ (500,000)$ Less variable expenses: - Manufacturing expenses 120,000 - 120,000 Shipping 5,000 - 5,000 Commissions 75,000 - 75,000 Total variable expenses 200,000 - 200,000 Contribution margin 300,000 - (300,000) Less fixed expenses: General factory overhead 60,000 60,000 - Salary of line manager 90,000 - 90,000 Depreciation 50,000 50,000 - Advertising - direct 100,000 - 100,000 Rent - factory space 70,000 - 70,000 General admin. expenses 30,000 30,000 - Total fixed expenses 400,000 140,000 260,000 Net operating loss (100,000)$ (140,000)$ (40,000)$
  • 30. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Beware of Allocated Fixed Costs Why should we keep theWhy should we keep the digital watch segmentdigital watch segment when it’s showing awhen it’s showing a $100,000$100,000 lossloss??
  • 31. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Beware of Allocated Fixed Costs The answer lies in theThe answer lies in the way we allocateway we allocate common fixed costscommon fixed costs toto our products.our products.
  • 32. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Beware of Allocated Fixed Costs Our allocations canOur allocations can make a segment lookmake a segment look less profitableless profitable than itthan it really is.really is.
  • 33. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Make or Buy Decision When a company is involved in more than oneWhen a company is involved in more than one activity in the entire value chain, it is verticallyactivity in the entire value chain, it is vertically integrated. A decision to carry out one of theintegrated. A decision to carry out one of the activities in the value chain internally, rather thanactivities in the value chain internally, rather than to buy externally from a supplier is called ato buy externally from a supplier is called a “make or buy” decision.“make or buy” decision. When a company is involved in more than oneWhen a company is involved in more than one activity in the entire value chain, it is verticallyactivity in the entire value chain, it is vertically integrated. A decision to carry out one of theintegrated. A decision to carry out one of the activities in the value chain internally, rather thanactivities in the value chain internally, rather than to buy externally from a supplier is called ato buy externally from a supplier is called a “make or buy” decision.“make or buy” decision.
  • 34. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Vertical Integration- Advantages Smoother flow of parts and materials Better quality control Realize profits
  • 35. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Vertical Integration- Disadvantage Companies may fail to take advantage of suppliers who can create economies of scale advantage by pooling demand from numerous companies.
  • 36. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Make or Buy Decision: An Example • Essex Company manufactures part 4A that is used in one of its products. • The unit product cost of this part is: Direct materials $ 9 Direct labor 5 Variable overhead 1 Depreciation of special equip. 3 Supervisor's salary 2 General factory overhead 10 Unit product cost 30$
  • 37. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Make or Buy Decision • The special equipment used to manufacture part 4A has no resale value. • The total amount of general factory overhead, which is allocated on the basis of direct labor hours, would be unaffected by this decision. • The $30 unit product cost is based on 20,000 parts produced each year. • An outside supplier has offered to provide the 20,000 parts at a cost of $25 per part. Should we accept the supplier’s offer?Should we accept the supplier’s offer? • The special equipment used to manufacture part 4A has no resale value. • The total amount of general factory overhead, which is allocated on the basis of direct labor hours, would be unaffected by this decision. • The $30 unit product cost is based on 20,000 parts produced each year. • An outside supplier has offered to provide the 20,000 parts at a cost of $25 per part. Should we accept the supplier’s offer?Should we accept the supplier’s offer?
  • 38. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Cost Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units Make Buy Outside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000 Direct materials 9$ 180,000 Direct labor 5 100,000 Variable overhead 1 20,000 Depreciation of equip. 3 - Supervisor's salary 2 40,000 General factory overhead 10 - Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$ The Make or Buy Decision 20,000 × $9 per unit = $180,00020,000 × $9 per unit = $180,00020,000 × $9 per unit = $180,00020,000 × $9 per unit = $180,000
  • 39. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Cost Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units Make Buy Outside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000 Direct materials 9$ 180,000 Direct labor 5 100,000 Variable overhead 1 20,000 Depreciation of equip. 3 - Supervisor's salary 2 40,000 General factory overhead 10 - Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$ The Make or Buy Decision The special equipment has no resaleThe special equipment has no resale value and is a sunk cost.value and is a sunk cost. The special equipment has no resaleThe special equipment has no resale value and is a sunk cost.value and is a sunk cost.
  • 40. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Cost Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units Make Buy Outside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000 Direct materials 9$ 180,000 Direct labor 5 100,000 Variable overhead 1 20,000 Depreciation of equip. 3 - Supervisor's salary 2 40,000 General factory overhead 10 - Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$ The Make or Buy Decision Not avoidable; irrelevant. If the product is dropped, it will be reallocated to other products. Not avoidable; irrelevant. If the product is dropped, it will be reallocated to other products.
  • 41. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Make or Buy Decision Should we make or buy part 4A?Should we make or buy part 4A? Cost Per Unit Cost of 20,000 Units Make Buy Outside purchase price $ 25 $ 500,000 Direct materials 9$ 180,000 Direct labor 5 100,000 Variable overhead 1 20,000 Depreciation of equip. 3 - Supervisor's salary 2 40,000 General factory overhead 10 - Total cost 30$ 340,000$ 500,000$
  • 42. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Opportunity Cost AnAn opportunity costopportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone as ais the benefit that is foregone as a result of pursuing some course of action.result of pursuing some course of action. Opportunity costs are not actual dollar outlays andOpportunity costs are not actual dollar outlays and are not recorded in the formal accounts of anare not recorded in the formal accounts of an organization.organization. How would this concept potentially relate to the EssexHow would this concept potentially relate to the Essex Company?Company? AnAn opportunity costopportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone as ais the benefit that is foregone as a result of pursuing some course of action.result of pursuing some course of action. Opportunity costs are not actual dollar outlays andOpportunity costs are not actual dollar outlays and are not recorded in the formal accounts of anare not recorded in the formal accounts of an organization.organization. How would this concept potentially relate to the EssexHow would this concept potentially relate to the Essex Company?Company?
  • 43. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Key Terms and Concepts A special order is a one-time order that is not considered part of the company’s normal ongoing business. When analyzing a special order only the incremental costs and benefits are relevant.
  • 44. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Special Orders  Jet, Inc. makes a single product whose normal sellingJet, Inc. makes a single product whose normal selling price is $20 per unit.price is $20 per unit.  A foreign distributor offers to purchase 3,000 units for $10A foreign distributor offers to purchase 3,000 units for $10 per unit.per unit.  This is a one-time order that would not affect theThis is a one-time order that would not affect the company’s regular business.company’s regular business.  Annual capacity is 10,000 units, but Jet, Inc. is currentlyAnnual capacity is 10,000 units, but Jet, Inc. is currently producing and selling only 5,000 units.producing and selling only 5,000 units.  Jet, Inc. makes a single product whose normal sellingJet, Inc. makes a single product whose normal selling price is $20 per unit.price is $20 per unit.  A foreign distributor offers to purchase 3,000 units for $10A foreign distributor offers to purchase 3,000 units for $10 per unit.per unit.  This is a one-time order that would not affect theThis is a one-time order that would not affect the company’s regular business.company’s regular business.  Annual capacity is 10,000 units, but Jet, Inc. is currentlyAnnual capacity is 10,000 units, but Jet, Inc. is currently producing and selling only 5,000 units.producing and selling only 5,000 units. Should Jet accept the offer?Should Jet accept the offer?
  • 45. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Special Orders $8 variable cost$8 variable cost$8 variable cost$8 variable cost
  • 46. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Special Orders If Jet accepts the offer, net operating income will increase by $6,000. Increase in revenue (3,000 × $10) 30,000$ Increase in costs (3,000 × $8 variable cost) 24,000 Increase in net income 6,000$ Note: This answer assumes that fixed costs are unaffected by the order and that variable marketing costs must be incurred on the special order.
  • 47. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Quick Check  Northern Optical ordinarily sells the X-lens for $50. The variable production cost is $10, the fixed production cost is $18 per unit, and the variable selling cost is $1. A customer has requested a special order for 10,000 units of the X-lens to be imprinted with the customer’s logo. This special order would not involve any selling costs, but Northern Optical would have to purchase an imprinting machine for $50,000. (see the next page) Northern Optical ordinarily sells the X-lens for $50. The variable production cost is $10, the fixed production cost is $18 per unit, and the variable selling cost is $1. A customer has requested a special order for 10,000 units of the X-lens to be imprinted with the customer’s logo. This special order would not involve any selling costs, but Northern Optical would have to purchase an imprinting machine for $50,000. (see the next page)
  • 48. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Quick Check  What is the rock bottom minimum price below which Northern Optical should not go in its negotiations with the customer? In other words, below what price would Northern Optical actually be losing money on the sale? There is ample idle capacity to fulfill the order and the imprinting machine has no further use after this order. a. $50 b. $10 c. $15 d. $29
  • 49. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin What is the rock bottom minimum price below which Northern Optical should not go in its negotiations with the customer? In other words, below what price would Northern Optical actually be losing money on the sale? There is ample idle capacity to fulfill the order and the imprinting machine has no further use after this order. a. $50 b. $10 c. $15 d. $29 Quick Check  Variable production costVariable production cost $100,000$100,000 Additional fixed costAdditional fixed cost 50,00050,000 Total relevant costTotal relevant cost $150,000$150,000 Number of unitsNumber of units 10,00010,000 Average cost per unitAverage cost per unit $15$15 Variable production costVariable production cost $100,000$100,000 Additional fixed costAdditional fixed cost 50,00050,000 Total relevant costTotal relevant cost $150,000$150,000 Number of unitsNumber of units 10,00010,000 Average cost per unitAverage cost per unit $15$15
  • 50. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Key Terms and Concepts When a limited resource of some type restricts the company’s ability to satisfy demand, the company is said to have a constraint. The machine or process that is limiting overall output is called the bottleneck – it is the constraint.
  • 51. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Utilization of a Constrained Resource • When a constraint exists, a company shouldWhen a constraint exists, a company should select a product mix that maximizes the totalselect a product mix that maximizes the total contribution margin earned since fixed costscontribution margin earned since fixed costs usually remain unchanged.usually remain unchanged. • A company should not necessarily promoteA company should not necessarily promote those products that have the highest unitthose products that have the highest unit contribution margin.contribution margin. • Rather, it should promote those products thatRather, it should promote those products that earn the highest contribution margin in relation toearn the highest contribution margin in relation to the constraining resource.the constraining resource. • When a constraint exists, a company shouldWhen a constraint exists, a company should select a product mix that maximizes the totalselect a product mix that maximizes the total contribution margin earned since fixed costscontribution margin earned since fixed costs usually remain unchanged.usually remain unchanged. • A company should not necessarily promoteA company should not necessarily promote those products that have the highest unitthose products that have the highest unit contribution margin.contribution margin. • Rather, it should promote those products thatRather, it should promote those products that earn the highest contribution margin in relation toearn the highest contribution margin in relation to the constraining resource.the constraining resource.
  • 52. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Utilization of a Constrained Resource: An Example Ensign Company produces two products and selected data is shown below:
  • 53. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Utilization of a Constrained Resource • Machine A1 is the constrained resource andMachine A1 is the constrained resource and is being used at 100% of its capacity.is being used at 100% of its capacity. • There is excess capacity on all otherThere is excess capacity on all other machines.machines. • Machine A1 has a capacity of 2,400 minutesMachine A1 has a capacity of 2,400 minutes per week.per week. Should Ensign focus its efforts onShould Ensign focus its efforts on Product 1 or 2?Product 1 or 2? • Machine A1 is the constrained resource andMachine A1 is the constrained resource and is being used at 100% of its capacity.is being used at 100% of its capacity. • There is excess capacity on all otherThere is excess capacity on all other machines.machines. • Machine A1 has a capacity of 2,400 minutesMachine A1 has a capacity of 2,400 minutes per week.per week. Should Ensign focus its efforts onShould Ensign focus its efforts on Product 1 or 2?Product 1 or 2?
  • 54. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Quick Check  How many units of each product can be processed through Machine A1 in one minute? Product 1 Product 2 a. 1 unit 0.5 unit b. 1 unit 2.0 units c. 2 units 1.0 unit d. 2 units 0.5 unit How many units of each product can be processed through Machine A1 in one minute? Product 1 Product 2 a. 1 unit 0.5 unit b. 1 unit 2.0 units c. 2 units 1.0 unit d. 2 units 0.5 unit
  • 55. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin How many units of each product can be processed through Machine A1 in one minute? Product 1 Product 2 a. 1 unit 0.5 unit b. 1 unit 2.0 units c. 2 units 1.0 unit d. 2 units 0.5 unit How many units of each product can be processed through Machine A1 in one minute? Product 1 Product 2 a. 1 unit 0.5 unit b. 1 unit 2.0 units c. 2 units 1.0 unit d. 2 units 0.5 unit Quick Check  I was just checking to make sure you are with us. I was just checking to make sure you are with us.
  • 56. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Quick Check  What generates more profit for the company, using one minute of machine A1 to process Product 1 or using one minute of machine A1 to process Product 2? a. Product 1 b. Product 2 c. They both would generate the same profit. d. Cannot be determined. What generates more profit for the company, using one minute of machine A1 to process Product 1 or using one minute of machine A1 to process Product 2? a. Product 1 b. Product 2 c. They both would generate the same profit. d. Cannot be determined.
  • 57. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin What generates more profit for the company, using one minute of machine A1 to process Product 1 or using one minute of machine A1 to process Product 2? a. Product 1 b. Product 2 c. They both would generate the same profit. d. Cannot be determined. What generates more profit for the company, using one minute of machine A1 to process Product 1 or using one minute of machine A1 to process Product 2? a. Product 1 b. Product 2 c. They both would generate the same profit. d. Cannot be determined. Quick Check  With one minute of machine A1, we could make 1 unit of Product 1, with a contribution margin of $24, or 2 units of Product 2, each with a contribution margin of $15. 2 × $15 = $30 > $24 With one minute of machine A1, we could make 1 unit of Product 1, with a contribution margin of $24, or 2 units of Product 2, each with a contribution margin of $15. 2 × $15 = $30 > $24
  • 58. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Utilization of a Constrained Resource The key is the contribution margin per unit of the constrained resource. Product 2 should be emphasized.Product 2 should be emphasized. Provides moreProvides more valuable use of the constrained resource machine A1,valuable use of the constrained resource machine A1, yielding a contribution margin of $30 per minute asyielding a contribution margin of $30 per minute as opposed to $24 for Product 1.opposed to $24 for Product 1. Product 2 should be emphasized.Product 2 should be emphasized. Provides moreProvides more valuable use of the constrained resource machine A1,valuable use of the constrained resource machine A1, yielding a contribution margin of $30 per minute asyielding a contribution margin of $30 per minute as opposed to $24 for Product 1.opposed to $24 for Product 1.
  • 59. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Utilization of a Constrained Resource If there are no other considerations, the bestIf there are no other considerations, the best plan would be to produce to meet currentplan would be to produce to meet current demand for Product 2 and then use remainingdemand for Product 2 and then use remaining capacity to make Product 1.capacity to make Product 1. If there are no other considerations, the bestIf there are no other considerations, the best plan would be to produce to meet currentplan would be to produce to meet current demand for Product 2 and then use remainingdemand for Product 2 and then use remaining capacity to make Product 1.capacity to make Product 1. The key is the contribution margin per unit of the constrained resource.
  • 60. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Utilization of a Constrained Resource Let’s see how this plan would work.Let’s see how this plan would work. Alloting Our Constrained Resource (Machine A1) Weekly demand for Product 2 2,200 units Time required per unit × 0.50 min. Total time required to make Product 2 1,100 min.
  • 61. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Alloting Our Constrained Resource (Machine A1) Weekly demand for Product 2 2,200 units Time required per unit × 0.50 min. Total time required to make Product 2 1,100 min. Total time available 2,400 min. Time used to make Product 2 1,100 min. Time available for Product 1 1,300 min. Utilization of a Constrained Resource Let’s see how this plan would work.Let’s see how this plan would work.
  • 62. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Utilization of a Constrained Resource Let’s see how this plan would work.Let’s see how this plan would work. Alloting Our Constrained Resource (Machine A1) Weekly demand for Product 2 2,200 units Time required per unit × 0.50 min. Total time required to make Product 2 1,100 min. Total time available 2,400 min. Time used to make Product 2 1,100 min. Time available for Product 1 1,300 min. Time required per unit ÷ 1.00 min. Production of Product 1 1,300 units
  • 63. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Utilization of a Constrained Resource According to the plan, we will produce 2,200 unitsAccording to the plan, we will produce 2,200 units of Product 2 and 1,300 of Product 1. Ourof Product 2 and 1,300 of Product 1. Our contribution margin looks like this.contribution margin looks like this. Product 1 Product 2 Production and sales (units) 1,300 2,200 Contribution margin per unit 24$ 15$ Total contribution margin 31,200$ 33,000$ The total contribution margin for Ensign is $64,200.The total contribution margin for Ensign is $64,200.The total contribution margin for Ensign is $64,200.The total contribution margin for Ensign is $64,200.
  • 64. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Quick Check  Colonial Heritage makes reproduction colonialColonial Heritage makes reproduction colonial furniture from select hardwoods.furniture from select hardwoods. The company’s supplier of hardwood will only beThe company’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Is thisable to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Is this enough hardwood to satisfy demand?enough hardwood to satisfy demand? a. Yesa. Yes b. Nob. No Chairs Tables Selling price per unit $80 $400 Variable cost per unit $30 $200 Board feet per unit 2 10 Monthly demand 600 100
  • 65. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colonial Heritage makes reproduction colonialColonial Heritage makes reproduction colonial furniture from select hardwoods.furniture from select hardwoods. The company’s supplier of hardwood will only beThe company’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Is thisable to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Is this enough hardwood to satisfy demand?enough hardwood to satisfy demand? a. Yesa. Yes b. Nob. No Quick Check  (2 × 600) + (10 × 100 ) = 2,200 > 2,000(2 × 600) + (10 × 100 ) = 2,200 > 2,000 Chairs Tables Selling price per unit $80 $400 Variable cost per unit $30 $200 Board feet per unit 2 10 Monthly demand 600 100
  • 66. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Quick Check  The company’s supplier of hardwood will onlyThe company’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month.be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. What plan would maximize profits?What plan would maximize profits? a. 500 chairs and 100 tablesa. 500 chairs and 100 tables b. 600 chairs and 80 tablesb. 600 chairs and 80 tables c. 500 chairs and 80 tablesc. 500 chairs and 80 tables d. 600 chairs and 100 tablesd. 600 chairs and 100 tables Chairs Tables Selling price per unit $80 $400 Variable cost per unit $30 $200 Board feet per unit 2 10 Monthly demand 600 100
  • 67. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin The company’s supplier of hardwood will onlyThe company’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month.be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. What plan would maximize profits?What plan would maximize profits? a. 500 chairs and 100 tablesa. 500 chairs and 100 tables b. 600 chairs and 80 tablesb. 600 chairs and 80 tables c. 500 chairs and 80 tablesc. 500 chairs and 80 tables d. 600 chairs and 100 tablesd. 600 chairs and 100 tables Quick Check  Chairs Tables Selling price per unit $80 $400 Variable cost per unit $30 $200 Board feet per unit 2 10 Monthly demand 600 100 Chairs Tables Selling price 80$ 400$ Variable cost 30 200 Contribution margin 50$ 200$ Board feet 2 10 CM per board foot 25$ 20$ Production of chairs 600 Board feet required 1,200 Board feet remaining 800 Board feet per table 10 Production of tables 80
  • 68. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Quick Check  As before, Colonial Heritage’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Assume the company follows the plan we have proposed. Up to how much should Colonial Heritage be willing to pay above the usual price to obtain more hardwood? a. $40 per board foot b. $25 per board foot c. $20 per board foot d. Zero As before, Colonial Heritage’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Assume the company follows the plan we have proposed. Up to how much should Colonial Heritage be willing to pay above the usual price to obtain more hardwood? a. $40 per board foot b. $25 per board foot c. $20 per board foot d. Zero
  • 69. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin As before, Colonial Heritage’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Assume the company follows the plan we have proposed. Up to how much should Colonial Heritage be willing to pay above the usual price to obtain more hardwood? a. $40 per board foot b. $25 per board foot c. $20 per board foot d. Zero As before, Colonial Heritage’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply 2,000 board feet this month. Assume the company follows the plan we have proposed. Up to how much should Colonial Heritage be willing to pay above the usual price to obtain more hardwood? a. $40 per board foot b. $25 per board foot c. $20 per board foot d. Zero Quick Check  The additional wood would be used to make tables. In this use, each board foot of additional wood will allow the company to earn an additional $20 of contribution margin and profit. The additional wood would be used to make tables. In this use, each board foot of additional wood will allow the company to earn an additional $20 of contribution margin and profit.
  • 70. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Managing Constraints Finding ways to process more units through a resource bottleneck At the bottleneck itself:At the bottleneck itself: • Improve the processImprove the process • Add overtime or another shiftAdd overtime or another shift • Hire new workers or acquireHire new workers or acquire more machinesmore machines • Subcontract productionSubcontract production • Reduce amount of defectiveReduce amount of defective units producedunits produced • Add workers transferred fromAdd workers transferred from non-bottleneck departmentsnon-bottleneck departments
  • 71. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Joint Costs • In some industries, a number of end products are produced from a single raw material input. • Two or more products produced from a common input are called joint productsjoint products. • The point in the manufacturing process where each joint product can be recognized as a separate product is called the split-off pointsplit-off point. • In some industries, a number of end products are produced from a single raw material input. • Two or more products produced from a common input are called joint productsjoint products. • The point in the manufacturing process where each joint product can be recognized as a separate product is called the split-off pointsplit-off point.
  • 72. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Joint Products Joint Input Common Production Process Split-OffSplit-Off PointPoint Oil Gasoline Chemicals
  • 73. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Joint Products Separate Processing Separate Processing Final Sale Final Sale Final Sale SeparateSeparate ProductProduct CostsCosts Joint Input Common Production Process Split-OffSplit-Off PointPoint JointJoint CostsCosts Oil Gasoline Chemicals
  • 74. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Pitfalls of Allocation Joint costs are oftenJoint costs are often allocated to end products onallocated to end products on the basis of thethe basis of the relativerelative sales valuesales value of each productof each product or on some other basis.or on some other basis. Although allocation is needed forAlthough allocation is needed for some purposes such as balancesome purposes such as balance sheet inventory valuation,sheet inventory valuation, allocations of this kind areallocations of this kind are veryvery dangerousdangerous for decision making.for decision making.
  • 75. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Joint costs are irrelevant in decisionsJoint costs are irrelevant in decisions regarding what to do with a product from theregarding what to do with a product from the split-off point forward.split-off point forward. It will always be profitable to continueIt will always be profitable to continue processing a joint product after the split-offprocessing a joint product after the split-off pointpoint so long as the incremental revenueso long as the incremental revenue exceeds the incremental processing costsexceeds the incremental processing costs incurred after the split-off pointincurred after the split-off point.. Sell or Process Further
  • 76. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Sell or Process Further: An Example • Sawmill, Inc. cuts logs from which unfinishedSawmill, Inc. cuts logs from which unfinished lumber and sawdust are the immediate jointlumber and sawdust are the immediate joint products.products. • Unfinished lumber is sold “as is” or processedUnfinished lumber is sold “as is” or processed further into finished lumber.further into finished lumber. • Sawdust can also be sold “as is” to gardeningSawdust can also be sold “as is” to gardening wholesalers or processed further into “presto-wholesalers or processed further into “presto- logs.”logs.” • Sawmill, Inc. cuts logs from which unfinishedSawmill, Inc. cuts logs from which unfinished lumber and sawdust are the immediate jointlumber and sawdust are the immediate joint products.products. • Unfinished lumber is sold “as is” or processedUnfinished lumber is sold “as is” or processed further into finished lumber.further into finished lumber. • Sawdust can also be sold “as is” to gardeningSawdust can also be sold “as is” to gardening wholesalers or processed further into “presto-wholesalers or processed further into “presto- logs.”logs.”
  • 77. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Sell or Process Further Data about Sawmill’s joint products includes: Per Log Lumber Sawdust Sales value at the split-off point 140$ 40$ Sales value after further processing 270 50 Allocated joint product costs 176 24 Cost of further processing 50 20
  • 78. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Sell or Process Further Analysis of Sell or Process Further Per Log Lumber Sawdust Sales value after further processing 270$ 50$ Sales value at the split-off point 140 40 Incremental revenue 130 10
  • 79. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Sell or Process Further Analysis of Sell or Process Further Per Log Lumber Sawdust Sales value after further processing 270$ 50$ Sales value at the split-off point 140 40 Incremental revenue 130 10 Cost of further processing 50 20 Profit (loss) from further processing 80$ (10)$
  • 80. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Analysis of Sell or Process Further Per Log Lumber Sawdust Sales value after further processing 270$ 50$ Sales value at the split-off point 140 40 Incremental revenue 130 10 Cost of further processing 50 20 Profit (loss) from further processing 80$ (10)$ Sell or Process Further Should we process the lumber furtherShould we process the lumber further and sell the sawdust “as is?”and sell the sawdust “as is?” Should we process the lumber furtherShould we process the lumber further and sell the sawdust “as is?”and sell the sawdust “as is?”
  • 81. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin Activity-Based Costing and RelevantActivity-Based Costing and Relevant CostsCosts ABC can be used to help identify potentially relevant costs for decision-making purposes. However, before making a decision, managers must decide which of the potentially relevant costs are actually avoidable.
  • 82. Copyright © 2006, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.McGraw-Hill/Irwin End of Chapter 13End of Chapter 13

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Making decisions is one of the basic functions of a manager. To be successful in decision making, managers must be able to tell the difference between relevant and irrelevant data and must be able to correctly use the relevant data in analyzing alternatives. The purpose of this chapter is to develop these skills by illustrating their use in a wide range of decision-making situations.
  2. A relevant cost is a cost that differs between alternatives.
  3. An avoidable cost is a cost that can be eliminated in whole or in part by choosing one alternative over another. Avoidable costs are relevant costs. Unavoidable costs are irrelevant costs. Two broad categories of costs are never relevant in any decision: One, a sunk cost is a cost that has already been incurred and cannot be avoided regardless of what a manager decides to do. Two, a future cost that does not differ between alternatives is never a relevant cost.
  4. Relevant cost analysis is a two-step process. The first step is to eliminate costs and benefits that do not differ between alternatives. These irrelevant costs consist of sunk costs and future costs that do not differ between alternatives. The second step is to use the remaining costs and benefits that do differ between alternatives in making the decision. The costs that remain are the differential, or avoidable, costs. .
  5. Costs that are relevant in one decision situation may not be relevant in another context. Thus, in each decision situation, the manager must examine the data at hand and isolate the relevant costs.
  6. Part I Assume the following information with respect to Cynthia, a Boston student who is considering visiting her friend in New York. Cynthia is trying to decide whether it would be less expensive to drive or take the train to New York. She has assembled the following information with respect to her automobile. Part II The straight-line depreciation is calculated as cost minus salvage value divided by useful life. Part III Gasoline per mile is calculated by taking the price per gallon of gasoline and dividing it by the number of miles per gallon of the car. Part IV The parking fee at school is forty five dollars a month. Cynthia attends school only eight months out of the year.
  7. She has also gathered this additional information to aid in her decision.
  8. Part I Which costs are relevant to her decision? The cost of the car is irrelevant to the decision because it is a sunk cost. The annual cost of auto insurance is irrelevant because it does not differ between alternatives. Part II The cost of the gasoline is relevant because it is avoidable if she takes the train.
  9. Part I The cost of maintenance and repairs is relevant because in the long-run these costs depend upon miles driven. The parking fee is irrelevant because it is not a differential cost. Part II At this point, we can see that some of the average cost of $0.569 per mile are relevant and others are not.
  10. Part I The decline in resale value is relevant due to the additional miles driven. The round trip train fare is relevant because it is avoidable if she drives her car. Relaxing on the train is relevant, but difficult to quantify. Part II The kennel cost is irrelevant because it is not a differential cost.
  11. The cost of parking is relevant because it is avoidable if she takes the train. The benefits of having a car in New York and the problem of finding a parking space are both relevant, but difficult to quantify.
  12. From a financial standpoint, Cynthia would be better off taking the train. But, as with any decision we may face, it may be the non-financial or non-quantitative factors that have the most impact on our decision.
  13. Assume the following information for a company considering a new labor-saving machine that rents for three thousand dollars per year.   The total approach requires constructing two contribution format income statements – one for each alternative. The difference between the two income statements of twelve thousand dollars equals the differential benefits shown at the bottom of the right-hand column.
  14. The most efficient means of analyzing this decision is to use the differential approach to isolate the relevant costs and benefits as shown.
  15. Using the differential approach is desirable for two reasons: One, only rarely will enough information be available to prepare detailed income statements for both alternatives. Two, mingling irrelevant costs with relevant costs may cause confusion and distract attention away from the information that is really critical.
  16. One of the most important decisions managers make is whether to add or drop a business segment. Ultimately, a decision to drop an old segment or add a new one is going to hinge primarily on the impact the decision will have on net operating income. To assess this impact it is necessary to carefully analyze the costs. Let’s see how relevant costs should be used in this type of decision.
  17. Assume that Lovell Company’s digital watch line has not reported a profit for several years; accordingly, Lovell is considering discontinuing this product line.
  18. To determine how dropping this line will affect the overall profits of the company, Lovell will compare the contribution margin that would be lost to the costs that would be avoided if the line was to be dropped. Lovell should drop the digital watch segment only if its profit would increase. This would only happen if the fixed cost savings exceed the lost contribution margin.
  19. Assume a segmented income statement for the digital watches line is as shown.
  20. An investigation has revealed that the fixed general factory overhead and fixed general administrative expenses will not be affected by dropping the digital watch line. The fixed general factory overhead and general administrative expenses assigned to this product would be reallocated to other product lines.
  21. Part I The equipment used to manufacture digital watches has no resale value or alternative use. Part II Should Lovell retain or drop the digital watch segment?
  22. A contribution margin approach reveals that the contribution margin lost (three hundred thousand dollars) exceeds the fixed costs avoided (two hundred sixty thousand dollars) by forty thousand dollars. Therefore, Lovell should retain the digital watch segment.
  23. Comparative income statements can also be prepared to help make the decision. Let’s look at this second approach.
  24. These income statements show that if the digital watch line is dropped, the company loses three hundred thousand dollars in contribution margin.
  25. The general factory overhead would be the same under both alternatives, so it is irrelevant.
  26. The salary of the product line manager would disappear, so it is relevant to the decision.
  27. The depreciation is a sunk cost. Also, remember that the equipment has no resale value or alternative use, so the equipment and the depreciation expense associated with it are irrelevant to the decision.
  28. The complete comparative income statements reveal that Lovell would earn forty thousand dollars of additional profit by retaining the digital watch line.
  29. Lovell’s allocated fixed costs can distort the keep/drop decision. Lovell’s managers may ask “why keep the digital watch segment when its segmented income statement shows a one hundred thousand dollar loss?”
  30. The answer lies in the way common fixed costs are allocated to products.
  31. Including unavoidable common fixed costs in the segmented income statement makes the digital watch product line appear to be unprofitable, when in fact dropping the product line would decrease the company’s overall net operating income.
  32. When a company is involved in more than one activity in the entire value chain, it is vertically integrated. A decision to carry out one of the activities in the value chain internally, rather than to buy externally from a supplier, is called a make or buy decision.
  33. Vertical integration provides certain advantages. An integrated company may be able to ensure a smoother flow of parts and materials for production than a nonintegrated company. Some companies feel that they can control quality better by producing their own parts and materials. Integrated companies realize profits from the parts and materials that they choose to make instead of buy.
  34. The primary disadvantage of vertical integration is that a company may fail to take advantage of suppliers who can create an economies of scale advantage by pooling demand from numerous companies.   While the economies of scale factor can be appealing, a company must be careful to retain control over activities that are essential to maintaining its competitive position.
  35. Assume that Essex Company manufactures part 4A with a unit product cost as shown.
  36. Also, assume the following information as shown with respect to part 4A. Given these additional assumptions, should Essex make or buy part 4A?
  37. The avoidable costs associated with making part 4A include direct materials, direct labor, variable overhead, and the supervisor’s salary.
  38. The depreciation of special equipment represents a sunk cost. Furthermore, the equipment has no resale value, thus the special equipment and its associated depreciation expense are irrelevant to the decision.
  39. The general factory overhead represents future costs that will be incurred regardless of whether Essex makes or buys part 4A; hence, it is also irrelevant to the decision.
  40. The total avoidable costs of three hundred forty thousand dollars are less than the five hundred thousand dollar cost of buying the part, thereby suggesting that Essex should continue to make the part.
  41. An opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone as a result of pursuing a course of action. These costs do not represent actual cash outlays and they are not recorded in the formal accounts of an organization. In the Essex Company example that we just completed, if Essex had an alternative use for the capacity that it used to make part 4A, there would have been an opportunity cost to factor into the analysis.   The opportunity cost would have been equal to the segment margin that could have been derived from the best alternative use of the space.
  42. A special order is a one-time order that is not considered part of the company’s normal ongoing business.   When analyzing a special order only the incremental costs and benefits are relevant. Since the existing fixed manufacturing overhead costs would not be affected by the order, they are not relevant.
  43. Assume the following information with respect to a special order opportunity for Jet Inc. Should Jet accept the offer?
  44. Part I A contribution format income statement for Jet Inc.’s normal sales of five thousand units is as shown. Part II Assume variable cost is eight dollars a unit. Total variable cost would be five thousand units times eight dollars a unit.
  45. If Jet accepts the special order, the incremental revenue of thirty thousand dollars will exceed the incremental costs of twenty four thousand dollars by six thousand dollars. This suggests that Jet should accept the order. Notice that this answer assumes that the fixed costs are unavoidable and that variable marketing costs must be incurred on the special order.
  46. Take a minute and read the information provided about Northern Optical.
  47. What is the rock bottom minimum price below which Northern Optical should not go in its negotiations with the customer?
  48. Fifteen dollars. Take a minute and review the solution to this problem before proceeding to the next slide.
  49. When a limited resource of some type restricts the company’s ability to satisfy demand, the company is said to have a constraint. The machine or process that is limiting overall output is called the bottleneck – it is the constraint.
  50. Fixed costs are usually unaffected in these situations, so the product mix that maximizes the company’s total contribution margin should ordinarily be selected.   A company should not necessarily promote those products that have the highest unit contribution margin. Rather, total contribution margin will be maximized by promoting those products or accepting those orders that provide the highest contribution margin in relation to the constraining resource.
  51. Assume that Ensign Company produces two products and selected data is as shown.
  52. In addition assume that:   One, machine A1 is the constraint. Two, there is excess capacity on all other machines. Three, machine A1 has a capacity of two thousand four hundred minutes per week. Should Ensign focus its efforts on Product 1 or 2?
  53. How many units of each product can be processed through Machine A1 in one minute?
  54. One unit of Product 1 and two units of Product 2.
  55. What generates more profit for the company, using one minute of machine A1 to process Product 1 or using one minute of machine A1 to process Product 2?
  56. Product 2. With one minute of machine A1, we could make 1 unit of Product 1, with a contribution margin of twenty four dollars, or 2 units of Product 2, each with a contribution margin of fifteen dollars.
  57. As suggested by the answer to the Quick Check question, Ensign should emphasize product 2 because it generates a contribution margin of thirty dollars per minute of the constrained resource relative to twenty four dollars per minute for product 1.
  58. Ensign can maximize its contribution margin by first producing product 2 to meet customer demand and then using any remaining capacity to produce product 1.
  59. The calculations would be performed as follows.   Satisfying the weekly demand of two thousand two hundred units for product 2 would consume one thousand one hundred minutes of available capacity on machine A1.
  60. This implies that one thousand three hundred constraint minutes would still be available to satisfy demand for product 1.
  61. Since each unit of product 1 requires one minute of A1 machine time, Ensign could produce one thousand three hundred units of product 1 with its remaining capacity.
  62. This mix of production would yield a total contribution margin of sixty four thousand two hundred dollars.
  63. Review the information provided about Colonial Heritage. Is this enough hardwood to satisfy demand?
  64. No. Colonial Heritage needs two thousand two hundred board feet to satisfy their demand.
  65. The company’s supplier of hardwood will only be able to supply two thousand board feet this month. What plan would maximize profits?
  66. Production of six hundred chairs and eighty tables would maximize contribution margin.
  67. Read this information about Colonial Heritage. Up to how much should Colonial Heritage be willing to pay above the usual price to obtain more hardwood?
  68. The additional wood would be used to make tables. In this use, each board foot of additional wood will allow the company to earn an additional twenty dollars of contribution margin and profit.
  69. It is often possible for a manager to increase the capacity of a bottleneck, which is called relaxing (or elevating) the constraint, in numerous ways such as:   Focusing business process improvement efforts on the bottleneck. Working overtime on the bottleneck. Investing in additional machines at the bottleneck. Subcontracting some of the processing that would be done at the bottleneck. Reducing defective units processed through the bottleneck. Shifting workers from non-bottleneck processes to the bottleneck. These methods and ideas are all consistent with the Theory of Constraints, which is introduced in Chapter 1. If a company has more than one potential constraint, the proper “mix” of products can be found using a quantitative method known as linear programming, which is covered in quantitative methods and operations management courses.
  70. In some industries, a number of end products are produced from a single raw material input. When two or more products are produced from a common input these products are known as joint products. The split-off point is the point in the manufacturing process at which the joint products can be recognized as separate products.
  71. For example, in the petroleum refining industry a large number of products are extracted from crude oil, including gasoline, jet fuel, home heating oil, lubricants, asphalt, and various organic chemicals.
  72. The term joint cost is used to describe costs incurred up to the split-off point. Joint costs are common costs incurred to simultaneously produce a variety of end products.
  73. Joint costs are traditionally allocated among different products at the split-off point. A typical approach is to allocate joint costs according to the relative sales value of the end products. Although allocation is needed for some purposes such as balanced sheet inventory valuation, allocations of this kind are very dangerous for decision making.
  74. Joint costs are irrelevant in decisions regarding what to do with a product from the split-off point forward. Therefore, these costs should not be allocated to end products for decision making purposes. With respect to sell or process further decisions, it is profitable to continue processing a joint product after the split-off point so long as the incremental revenue from such processing exceeds the incremental processing costs incurred after the split-off point.
  75. Assume the facts as shown with respect to Sawmill, Inc.
  76. Sawmill has two joint products – lumber and sawdust. Selected financial information is shown for each joint product.
  77. The incremental revenue from further processing of the lumber and sawdust is one hundred thirty dollars and ten dollars, respectively.
  78. The profit (loss) from further processing is eighty dollars for the lumber and negative ten dollars for the sawdust.
  79. The lumber should be processed further and the sawdust should be sold at the split-off point.
  80. Activity-based costing can be used to help identify potentially relevant costs for decision-making purposes. However, managers should exercise caution against reading more into this “traceability” than really exists. People have a tendency to assume that if a cost is traceable to a segment, then the cost is automatically avoidable, which is untrue. Before making a decision, managers must decide which of the potentially relevant costs are actually avoidable.
  81. Managers must be able to tell the difference between relevant and irrelevant data and must be able to correctly use the relevant data in analyzing alternatives. In this chapter we developed these skills and illustrated their use in a wide range of decision-making situations.