How to measure reliability

Ammar Alkhaldi
Real Reliability
15 March 2016
PART 1: why you shall not use MTBF!!!
How to Measure Reliability

Measurement can help us to answer the followings
question:
Are we doing good or bad ?
Is our performance increasing or decreasing ?
Which unit is performing better ? (Benchmarking)
What/How to improve ?
“You can’t improve what you can’t measure”
Why are we measuring things ?

1. MTBF is a misleading indicator.
 Example: 1000 Units, one unit fail @ 1 Hour, MTBF = 1000 Hours
1 Unit fail @ 1000 hours, MTBF = 1000 Hours
Is it the same ?
 First of all:-
How you shall not measure reliability!!!
𝑴𝑻𝑩𝑭 = 𝜽 =
𝑶𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑯𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒔
# 𝑭𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒔
How to measure reliability ?

2. MTBF Can’t be used for benchmarking.
 Example:
SYSTEM #2 seems to be performing better
 First of all:-
SYSTEM January February
SYSTEM #1 150 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠
6 𝐹𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑠
MTBF = 25 690 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠
MTBF = 46
MTBF = 50

2. MTBF Can’t be used for benchmarking.
 Example:
But not really.
Any sense ?
 First of all:-
SYSTEM January February TOTAL
MTBF = 40
MTBF = 35

3. MTBF is time independent.
 Example: 12 failures over 12 months, MTBF = (365/12) = 30.4
MTBF = 30.4
 First of all:-
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F7F6 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12

MTBF= 30.4, But the failure rate is
increasing?
 First of all:-
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12
F
1
F
2
F
3
F
4
F
5
F
7
F
6
F
8
F
9
F
1
0
F
1
1
F
1
2

decreasing?
 First of all:-
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12
F
1
F
2
F
3
F
4
F
5
F
7
F
6
F
8
F
9
F
1
0
F
1
1
F
1
2

decreasing? When to plan PMs ?
 First of all:-
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12
F
1
F
2
F
3
F
4
F
5
F
7
F
6
F
8
F
9
F
1
0
F
1
1
F
1
2

4. MTBF considering normal distribution, is your data so ?
 Example:
But first, how different distribution can
make different result/decision ?
 First of all:-

Here is the beautiful normal
distribution AKA Bell shape.
Where MEAN = MEDIAN = MODE
The normal distribution
MEAN TIME BETWEEN FAILURES
So we are talking about the mean, and our
X-axis is time, and Y-Axis is failures

IS YOUR DATA FOLLWING THE
NORMAL DISTRBUTION ?

IS YOUR DATA FOLLWING THE
NORMAL DISTRBUTION ?
Let’s see

Let’s say we are studding
the failure of lightbulb,
we have a group of 100
bulb, and we are running
in the constant failure
rate part of the bath
curve (Phase 2)

curve (Phase 2), we’ll
assume this rate = 1%,
Remember
MTBF = 1/failure rate
MTBF = 1/1% = 100
MTBF = 100

curve (Phase 2), we’ll
assume this rate = 1%,
Remember
MTBF = 1/failure rate
MTBF = 1/1% = 100
MTBF = 100
So half of the population
should be failed by the @
100 hours
Let’s try it

The data points will
followings:-
100 – 1% = 99
99 – 1% = 98.01
98.01-1%= 97.02
97.02 – 1% = 96.05
And so on…
@ 100 hours we left with
37 units…
But why ? We suppose to
get MEAN=50 unit ???
Simply because the failure
pattern unfirming an
exponential distribution.
For exponential :
MEAN ≠ MEDIAN ≠ MODE
But is everything followings
exponential pattern ?
NO
EVERY FAILURE MODE HAVE
IT’S UNIQUE DISTRBUTION
SHAPE.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120 1
13
25
37
49
61
73
85
97
109
121
133
145
157
169
181
193
205
217
229
241
253
265
Units
Time in Hours
@ 100 hours only 37 units survives

If you think MTBF is not the wright way
to measure reliability then stay toned
for the upcoming post.
Salam
Ammar Alkhaldi, CSSBB
So how to measure reliability then ?

How to measure reliability

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to How to measure reliability

Similar to How to measure reliability (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

How to measure reliability