Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.
Public procurement issues
Dr Albert Sanchez-Graells, Reader in Economic Law
Unfair competition from the public sector in c...
Agenda
• Raise some issues concerning the increasing
gaps that (EU) procurement rules leave for
public intervention in the...
Narrowing scope of procurement rules in
atomised / intermediated markets
• Recent tendency to limit the scope of (EU) publ...
Expansion of in-house, public-public
collaboration and centralisation
• New rules on in-house, public-public and
centralis...
Reservation of contracts
• For special & social services up to €750k /3 years
• Creates difficulties in small markets wher...
State aid through ’secondary policies’
• Inclusion of special performance conditions,
particularly labour / wage requireme...
Summary of regulatory gaps
• Shortcomings in application of standard
competition law, depending on market
definition
• Sho...
Potential solutions
• Legislation of principle of competitive neutrality
• Creation of domestic ‘public aid’ rules that
re...
Conclusions
• In the procurement context, there is an
expanding regulatory gap that may result in
distortions of competiti...
Thank you for your attention
• Stay in touch
a.sanchez-graells@bristol.ac.uk
@asanchezgraells
http://howtocrackanut.com
Un...
Nächste SlideShare
Wird geladen in …5
×

Procurement issues SCF unfair competition from the public sector (glasgow, sept 2017)

5.262 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

Presentation given at the Scottish Competition Forum on public procurement issues concerning potential unfair competition from the public sector in commercial markets.

Veröffentlicht in: Recht
  • Als Erste(r) kommentieren

  • Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, denen das gefällt!

Procurement issues SCF unfair competition from the public sector (glasgow, sept 2017)

  1. 1. Public procurement issues Dr Albert Sanchez-Graells, Reader in Economic Law Unfair competition from the public sector in commercial markets: crowding out and state aid after Brexit Scottish Competition Forum, Glasgow, 7 September 2017 7 September 2017 1Unfair competition from the public sector after Brexit
  2. 2. Agenda • Raise some issues concerning the increasing gaps that (EU) procurement rules leave for public intervention in the market (via purchases) • Revisit interaction with EU State aid rules • Suggest some possible (post-Brexit) solutions Unfair competition from the public sector after Brexit 2 7 September 2017
  3. 3. Narrowing scope of procurement rules in atomised / intermediated markets • Recent tendency to limit the scope of (EU) public procurement rules • Falk Pharma – non-procurement systems for the delivery of goods/services in atomised markets • Creates an incentive for a substitution of procurement with licensing that can benefit incumbent (quasi/formerly public) providers Unfair competition from the public sector after Brexit 3 7 September 2017
  4. 4. Expansion of in-house, public-public collaboration and centralisation • New rules on in-house, public-public and centralised procurement allow for direct awards to less than full-arms’ length entities that can then compete in commercial markets • In-house + public-public up to 20% • Centralised without (explicit) limits • Does competition law apply here? Unfair competition from the public sector after Brexit 4 7 September 2017
  5. 5. Reservation of contracts • For special & social services up to €750k /3 years • Creates difficulties in small markets where private providers are bound to become sub-contractors of the (mutuals) beneficiaries of the reservation • Particularly problematic if combined with local aggregation; can create local dominant positions (cf Manchester out-of-hospital care tender and English NHS STPs under 5 year forward view) Unfair competition from the public sector after Brexit 5 7 September 2017
  6. 6. State aid through ’secondary policies’ • Inclusion of special performance conditions, particularly labour / wage requirements, can also result in de facto reservation of contracts • Theoretical need for regional legislation, but much going on de facto (local value, apprenticeships, etc) • Can also have an element of State aid, in particular if any increased contract price is not (monitored to be) transferred down to workers / community Unfair competition from the public sector after Brexit 6 7 September 2017
  7. 7. Summary of regulatory gaps • Shortcomings in application of standard competition law, depending on market definition • Shortcomings in application of EU State aid rules due to threshold values • Shortcomings in judicial review of procurement decisions unless strict proportionality test adopted (+ principle of competition)Unfair competition from the public sector after Brexit 7 7 September 2017
  8. 8. Potential solutions • Legislation of principle of competitive neutrality • Creation of domestic ‘public aid’ rules that replicate EU standards with lower value thresholds • Regulation of use of carve-outs from procurement rules + strict (public interest) judicial review of that discretion Unfair competition from the public sector after Brexit 8 7 September 2017
  9. 9. Conclusions • In the procurement context, there is an expanding regulatory gap that may result in distortions of competition in the medium term, in particular in small markets • Need for strict review under procurement rules • Functional need for ‘public aid’ controls at lower value levels than EU rules Unfair competition from the public sector after Brexit 9 7 September 2017
  10. 10. Thank you for your attention • Stay in touch a.sanchez-graells@bristol.ac.uk @asanchezgraells http://howtocrackanut.com Unfair competition from the public sector after Brexit 10 7 September 2017

×