Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

First Contact: Can Switching to RINA save the Internet?

289 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

First Contact: Can Switching to RINA save the Internet?

Veröffentlicht in: Internet
  • Als Erste(r) kommentieren

  • Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, denen das gefällt!

First Contact: Can Switching to RINA save the Internet?

  1. 1. First Contact: Can Switching to RINA save the Internet? Kristjon Ciko, Michael Welzl University of Oslo 6th International RINA Workshop Paris, February 2019
  2. 2. 2/11 Outline • Intro & Motivation • One-ISP scenario • Comparison: Internet vs. RINA • Evaluation • Conclusions • Future Work
  3. 3. 3/11 RINA in a nutshell • Networking is only IPC • IPCP – a container that provides many functionalities like: - routing - transport - security - management • DIF – a single type of layer that recursively repeats itself • Two protocols: - Error and Flow Control Protocol (based on Delta-t) - Common Distributed Application Protocol • Three types of nodes: Hosts, Interior routers, Border routers Host 1 Host 2 SHIM-IPCP Pysical link SHIM-DIF EFCP Flow Allocator Resource Allocator Delimiting RIBMUX IPC Process SHIM-IPCP EFCP Flow Allocator Resource Allocator Delimiting RIBMUX Distributed IPC Facility Port ID Port ID Application Process Application Process Application Protocol Application Protocol Image credit: reproduced from “Networking is IPC”: A Guiding Principle to a Better Internet
  4. 4. 4/11 Motivation • Advancing the RINA deployment • Proving that RINA can show great performance • Investigating the possibility of directly switching from the Internet to RINA
  5. 5. 5/11 One-ISP scenario • First contact: The very beginning, when no preparations were made by the end hosts to enable communication (except the DNS Server) • Second contact: A host has already found the peer and managed to talk to it, and local host caches were filled with information. Client CDN Server DNS server 1. DHCP 2. DNS 3. HTTP/TCP Host client PtP-DIF PtP-DIF Routing-DIF Flow Web client application CDN server application Router Router Host server
  6. 6. 6/11 Internet vs. RINA • Preparation: In the Internet, it includes the DHCP and DNS procedures. In RINA, this phase is composed of the Enrollment and App. discovery. • Establishment: 3-way handshake in the Internet – End-to-end flow allocation in RINA. • Data Transfer: The time between the first GET and the response from the server.
  7. 7. 7/11 Evaluation • The Preparation phase takes longer than the other two phases. • DHCP + DNS procedures take more time than the RINA Enrollment and App. Discovery. • Optimizing the RINA prototype will reduce the timing overhead in the communication phases. 1 4 16 64 256 1024 Preparation Establishment Transfer Time(ms) Standard TCP 1066.32 12.60 12.53 TCP Fast Open 1065.19 12.65 12.65 RINA 22.85 14.20 13.32 32 64 128 256 512 1024 Preparation Establishment Transfer Time(ms) Standard TCP1255.99 120.65 120.56 TCP Fast Open 1240.64 120.66 120.65 RINA 167.14 122.25 121.30
  8. 8. 8/11 Evaluation (2) • RINA and TFO do not need an extra round-trip in the second contact. • The end hosts will use the same flow (as long as it is not deallocated) with a new connection state. • RINA ‘’always’’ works. 0 50 100 150 200 250 RTT=12ms RTT=120ms Time(ms) Standard TCP 25.10 241.18 TCP Fast Open 12.65 120.66 RINA 12.57 120.57
  9. 9. 9/11 Conclusions • RINA is designed to provide several advantages over the current Internet. • It shows to be efficient during all phases of the communication and specially in the ‘’second contact’’. • Has all the potential to combine the benefits of several TCP extenstions.
  10. 10. 10/11 Future Works • investigating the use and optimization of RINA_Proxy • how to perform a full “switch-over” to RINA (Happy Eyeballs)
  11. 11. 11/11 Thank you! Questions?