Submit Search
Upload
Aquinasandjustice
•
Download as PPT, PDF
•
2 likes
•
556 views
Z
zmiers
Follow
Report
Share
Report
Share
1 of 8
Download now
Recommended
November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1
November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1
Austin Cohen
Justice & Economic Distribution
Chapter # 3
Chapter # 3
Syed Muhammad ALi Shah
Information privacy is rife with unanswered questions of distributive justice. Privacy at least contributes to achieving just distributions of social goods. Information flow models of privacy assume answers to questions about justice in acquisition and transfer that may be indefensible on their own or incompatible with each other. Rights approaches often assume rather than articulate a justification of privacy itself. And there are considerable implicit differences between the two in what is to be distributed. It should not be seen as practical to address questions of information privacy without considering these questions. But Young’s critique of the distributive paradigm reveals deeper problems with understanding the question of justice in information privacy. Information privacy is as much a matter of social structure as it is of distributing material or moral goods, and the focus on distribution obscures the ways in which information privacy violations challenge the ability to participate in determining one’s actions. These critiques suggest that a more productive line of inquiry would be to pursue information justice as a matter of primarily structural rather than distributive justice.
The Value-and Limits-of Distributive Justice in Information Privacy
The Value-and Limits-of Distributive Justice in Information Privacy
Digital Sociology Mini-Conference
social justice
Social justice report in ethics
Social justice report in ethics
Melvs Garcia
What is Justice
What is Justice
Mr. Finnie
Equality does not mean justice...:)
Justice
Justice
sjykmuch
1111298173 282415 7
1111298173 282415 7
dborcoman
A presentation held by Tabea Hirzel at the SMCU Residency with Prof. Hardy Boullion. Abstract. “Anarchy, State, and Utopia” [CITATION Noz74 \l 2055 ] is a work in the libertarian tradition of constitutional theory in which Robert Nozick sets up an explanation why societies are organized as states and how these states came to be. His major point is to justify the state and the state’s actions morally. Nozick bases his theory on the normative paradigm of rights held by individuals where the act of violating them is considered unfair and unjust [ CITATION Lef79 \l 2055 ]. Starting from a state-of-nature theory he defines rights as redistributive side constrains [CITATION Noz74 \p 32 \l 2055 ] leading to what he denominates his “entitlement theory” from which, by each and every one’s primordial intention to protect one’s own rights, emerges the state in an evolutionary process based on free exchange of obligations and rights. This theory defines the minimal state as the ideal form and any further extended state as illegitimate, following that its extension could only come in existence by violation of individual rights only. Even though his theory remains at the end unreliable its moral justification [ CITATION Bar77 \l 2055 ] or “incoherent” in his explanatory attempt [ CITATION Dav77 \l 2055 ], his approach based on rights where people as free agents use moral values as functions towards the goal of the individuals higher happiness is revolutionary in constitutional theories and future theories may find a rich foundation to build on its dynamics.
Anarchy, state, and utopia
Anarchy, state, and utopia
Tabea Hirzel
Recommended
November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1
November 29 2009 A Comparison Of Utilitarian Theory And Retributive Justice 1 1
Austin Cohen
Justice & Economic Distribution
Chapter # 3
Chapter # 3
Syed Muhammad ALi Shah
Information privacy is rife with unanswered questions of distributive justice. Privacy at least contributes to achieving just distributions of social goods. Information flow models of privacy assume answers to questions about justice in acquisition and transfer that may be indefensible on their own or incompatible with each other. Rights approaches often assume rather than articulate a justification of privacy itself. And there are considerable implicit differences between the two in what is to be distributed. It should not be seen as practical to address questions of information privacy without considering these questions. But Young’s critique of the distributive paradigm reveals deeper problems with understanding the question of justice in information privacy. Information privacy is as much a matter of social structure as it is of distributing material or moral goods, and the focus on distribution obscures the ways in which information privacy violations challenge the ability to participate in determining one’s actions. These critiques suggest that a more productive line of inquiry would be to pursue information justice as a matter of primarily structural rather than distributive justice.
The Value-and Limits-of Distributive Justice in Information Privacy
The Value-and Limits-of Distributive Justice in Information Privacy
Digital Sociology Mini-Conference
social justice
Social justice report in ethics
Social justice report in ethics
Melvs Garcia
What is Justice
What is Justice
Mr. Finnie
Equality does not mean justice...:)
Justice
Justice
sjykmuch
1111298173 282415 7
1111298173 282415 7
dborcoman
A presentation held by Tabea Hirzel at the SMCU Residency with Prof. Hardy Boullion. Abstract. “Anarchy, State, and Utopia” [CITATION Noz74 \l 2055 ] is a work in the libertarian tradition of constitutional theory in which Robert Nozick sets up an explanation why societies are organized as states and how these states came to be. His major point is to justify the state and the state’s actions morally. Nozick bases his theory on the normative paradigm of rights held by individuals where the act of violating them is considered unfair and unjust [ CITATION Lef79 \l 2055 ]. Starting from a state-of-nature theory he defines rights as redistributive side constrains [CITATION Noz74 \p 32 \l 2055 ] leading to what he denominates his “entitlement theory” from which, by each and every one’s primordial intention to protect one’s own rights, emerges the state in an evolutionary process based on free exchange of obligations and rights. This theory defines the minimal state as the ideal form and any further extended state as illegitimate, following that its extension could only come in existence by violation of individual rights only. Even though his theory remains at the end unreliable its moral justification [ CITATION Bar77 \l 2055 ] or “incoherent” in his explanatory attempt [ CITATION Dav77 \l 2055 ], his approach based on rights where people as free agents use moral values as functions towards the goal of the individuals higher happiness is revolutionary in constitutional theories and future theories may find a rich foundation to build on its dynamics.
Anarchy, state, and utopia
Anarchy, state, and utopia
Tabea Hirzel
John rawls
John rawls
StudsPlanet.com
A brief presentation about Egalitarianism following with Ethics.
Egalitarianism
Egalitarianism
Md. Mehedi Hasan
The International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE). Science, Technology and Medicine Journals Call for Academic Manuscripts
A critique of john rawls’ social justice theory and the fate of nigeria’s pol...
A critique of john rawls’ social justice theory and the fate of nigeria’s pol...
Alexander Decker
justice
Justice
Justice
DaquanLeroySwearing
Justice Theory 303 Final Presentation
Justice Theory
Justice Theory
Michael Willey
G6 rawlsi
G6 rawlsi
Dr. Mark C. Vopat
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
Shaheb Anik
Chapter 6: Utilitarianism
Chapter 6: Utilitarianism
dborcoman
Moral Philosophy: Utilitarianism
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lecture
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lecture
Mut Somoeun
Slides regarding Utilitarianism (mainly Jeremy Bentham) for an undergraduate course in Political Thought that I taught between 2003-2005.
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
brianbelen
Justice as Equality
Justice as Equality
Tuan Syahmi Matter
Utilitarian
Utilitarian
dev
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
Sayan Sarkar
5 utilitarianism cognitivism and consequentialism
5 utilitarianism cognitivism and consequentialism
Alwyn Dalmeida
Quick presentation on the week 6 reading of Rawls
A Preliminary Trawl through Rawls
A Preliminary Trawl through Rawls
Hugh Barnard
Theory of justice(john rawls 1921-2002) business ethics
Theory of justice
Theory of justice
Aman Thakur
This ppt deals with the concept of global distributive justice concept by Chris Armstrong.
Global distributive justice
Global distributive justice
National Law School of India University, Bangalore
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY OF JOHN RAWLS
THE CHAIN IS AS STRONG AS ITS WEAKEST LINK
THE CHAIN IS AS STRONG AS ITS WEAKEST LINK
Shivani Sharma
Justice
Justice
Arjama Das Gupta
Theory of justice
Theory of justice
StudsPlanet.com
G5 kant
G5 kant
Dr. Mark C. Vopat
Philosopher Overview-Media Ethics
Philosopher Overview-Media Ethics
Donica Mensing
More Related Content
What's hot
John rawls
John rawls
StudsPlanet.com
A brief presentation about Egalitarianism following with Ethics.
Egalitarianism
Egalitarianism
Md. Mehedi Hasan
The International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE). Science, Technology and Medicine Journals Call for Academic Manuscripts
A critique of john rawls’ social justice theory and the fate of nigeria’s pol...
A critique of john rawls’ social justice theory and the fate of nigeria’s pol...
Alexander Decker
justice
Justice
Justice
DaquanLeroySwearing
Justice Theory 303 Final Presentation
Justice Theory
Justice Theory
Michael Willey
G6 rawlsi
G6 rawlsi
Dr. Mark C. Vopat
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
Shaheb Anik
Chapter 6: Utilitarianism
Chapter 6: Utilitarianism
dborcoman
Moral Philosophy: Utilitarianism
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lecture
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lecture
Mut Somoeun
Slides regarding Utilitarianism (mainly Jeremy Bentham) for an undergraduate course in Political Thought that I taught between 2003-2005.
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
brianbelen
Justice as Equality
Justice as Equality
Tuan Syahmi Matter
Utilitarian
Utilitarian
dev
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
Sayan Sarkar
5 utilitarianism cognitivism and consequentialism
5 utilitarianism cognitivism and consequentialism
Alwyn Dalmeida
Quick presentation on the week 6 reading of Rawls
A Preliminary Trawl through Rawls
A Preliminary Trawl through Rawls
Hugh Barnard
Theory of justice(john rawls 1921-2002) business ethics
Theory of justice
Theory of justice
Aman Thakur
This ppt deals with the concept of global distributive justice concept by Chris Armstrong.
Global distributive justice
Global distributive justice
National Law School of India University, Bangalore
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE THEORY OF JOHN RAWLS
THE CHAIN IS AS STRONG AS ITS WEAKEST LINK
THE CHAIN IS AS STRONG AS ITS WEAKEST LINK
Shivani Sharma
Justice
Justice
Arjama Das Gupta
Theory of justice
Theory of justice
StudsPlanet.com
What's hot
(20)
John rawls
John rawls
Egalitarianism
Egalitarianism
A critique of john rawls’ social justice theory and the fate of nigeria’s pol...
A critique of john rawls’ social justice theory and the fate of nigeria’s pol...
Justice
Justice
Justice Theory
Justice Theory
G6 rawlsi
G6 rawlsi
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
Chapter 6: Utilitarianism
Chapter 6: Utilitarianism
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lecture
Utiliteriansim chapter 5 lecture
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
Justice as Equality
Justice as Equality
Utilitarian
Utilitarian
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism
5 utilitarianism cognitivism and consequentialism
5 utilitarianism cognitivism and consequentialism
A Preliminary Trawl through Rawls
A Preliminary Trawl through Rawls
Theory of justice
Theory of justice
Global distributive justice
Global distributive justice
THE CHAIN IS AS STRONG AS ITS WEAKEST LINK
THE CHAIN IS AS STRONG AS ITS WEAKEST LINK
Justice
Justice
Theory of justice
Theory of justice
Similar to Aquinasandjustice
G5 kant
G5 kant
Dr. Mark C. Vopat
Philosopher Overview-Media Ethics
Philosopher Overview-Media Ethics
Donica Mensing
ETHICS
Chapter 6 Kant Theory
Chapter 6 Kant Theory
UNIVERSITY OF MAKATI
Duties and Imperatives The Ethics of Conflict Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Remained his whole life in Königsberg (eastern Prussia). Famous for his three Critiques: of “pure reason,” “practical reason,” and “judgment”. Proposes a duty-based, universal, “deontological” theory of ethics. Thought of morality and nature, values and facts as distinct. Moral Agency Kant insists that it is only the presence of a “good will” that makes any act morally valuable. He rejects rival theories that locate moral worth primarily in: a) virtue, b) happiness, or c) sympathy. Kant’s position is called “deontological” (from the Greek deon, “what must be”) and focuses on absolute moral duties. It is opposed, classically to utilitarian (more broadly consequentialist) theories of ethics, which focus on good results. Four basic mental powers According to Kant there are four basic human mental powers: sensibility, imagination, understanding, and reason. Sensibility and imagination are, respectively, capacities to be affected by and to bring together impressions from physical objects. Understanding is the capacity to use concepts to organize the sense impressions that reach the mind via the senses. Reason, as distinct from the understanding, is the mind’s ability to be guided by abstract ideas such as goodness, freedom, and God. Reason and human nature Kant makes the traditional assumption of western philosophy: reason is both essential and unique to human beings. Whereas “understanding” is the human capacity for knowledge of nature (science), “reason” is the human capacity for being moral. Kant insists that the test of true morality is an individual’s ability to rise above self-interest for the sake of the rational moral community. Reason is what makes each of us human, and being moral is the deliberate and consistent exercise of our rational capacity. Morality resides “within” Kant’s ethics is undoubtedly influenced by pietism: a religious movement within Lutheranism highlighting intense individual faith. This influence may account to some degree for Kant’s idea that morality resides in individual good will and strict duty. While Kant as an Enlightenment figure celebrated and added to scientific insights into nature, he saw morality a matter of humanity’s “inner” truth. But this inner truth consists in everyone respecting and acting according to universal moral law. Kant strives to be the Newton of morality. Hence the paradox: morality is individual conviction following universal law. The solitary moral hero Caspar David Friedrich, Wanderer Above a Sea of Fog (1818) Questions Why does Kant see the “good will” as the only source of pure moral worth? Does Kant imply that an ethical agent should be unconcerned with human happiness? What sense does it make to locate in human reason the capacity to be moral? If morality is always a question of “good will,” how can we know when anyone is being truly moral? Pure Practical Reaso ...
Duties and ImperativesThe Ethics of ConflictImmanuel Kan.docx
Duties and ImperativesThe Ethics of ConflictImmanuel Kan.docx
sagarlesley
G5 oneil
G5 oneil
Dr. Mark C. Vopat
-
Chapter 2 _Session 5 _ 6 _ 7_.pptx
Chapter 2 _Session 5 _ 6 _ 7_.pptx
FarrukhMasood4
Week 2 ethical theories ppt
Week 2 ethical theories ppt
SraMrsich
Aristoteles
Aristoteles
chelsyy sanchez
Kant power point
Kant power point
ewolterb
Answer FOUR questions. Each question is worth 10 points. 1. What are some of the features of Plato’s theory of justice as set out in his Republic? How can these features of justice be applied to the opposed views on distributive justice according to the positions developed by Rawls and Nozick? 2. Explain Aristotle’s three-way distinction of human action as a) voluntary, b) involuntary and c) non-voluntary. Give examples of each kind of action. How can Aristotle’s theory of human agency be applied to the three models of punishment: retributivism, deterrence, and rehabilitation. 3. Explain the nature and role of ‘moral sentiment’ in Hume’s outline of morality. What role, if any, is played by reason in Hume’s account of moral action? In light of Hume’s theory, reconstruct the debate between Singer and Arthur. 4. Explain Kant’s two formulations of the ‘categorical imperative’ according to a) universalizability and b) non-instrumentalization. How might these formulations be applied to the question of preemptive international conflict. Give examples to illustrate these applications. 5. What is Mill’s concept of the basic ethical principle according to utilitarianism and what is his proof of this principle? What are Mill’s views on the freedom of speech and thought and how do these shed light on the debate about pornography between Altman and Brison? Duties and Imperatives The Ethics of Conflict Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Remained his whole life in Königsberg (eastern Prussia). Famous for his three Critiques: of “pure reason,” “practical reason,” and “judgment”. Proposes a duty-based, universal, “deontological” theory of ethics. Thought of morality and nature, values and facts as distinct. Moral Agency Kant insists that it is only the presence of a “good will” that makes any act morally valuable. He rejects rival theories that locate moral worth primarily in: a) virtue, b) happiness, or c) sympathy. Kant’s position is called “deontological” (from the Greek deon, “what must be”) and focuses on absolute moral duties. It is opposed, classically to utilitarian (more broadly consequentialist) theories of ethics, which focus on good results. Four basic mental powers According to Kant there are four basic human mental powers: sensibility, imagination, understanding, and reason. Sensibility and imagination are, respectively, capacities to be affected by and to bring together impressions from physical objects. Understanding is the capacity to use concepts to organize the sense impressions that reach the mind via the senses. Reason, as distinct from the understanding, is the mind’s ability to be guided by abstract ideas such as goodness, freedom, and God. Reason and human nature Kant makes the traditional assumption of western philosophy: reason is both essential and unique to human beings. Whereas “understanding” is the human capacity for knowledge of nature (science), “reason” is the human capacity for being mora.
Answer FOUR questions. Each question is worth 10 points. 1. .docx
Answer FOUR questions. Each question is worth 10 points. 1. .docx
justine1simpson78276
Man and ethics
Man and ethics
Ezekiel Rodriguez
Ethics
JUSTICE-AND-FAIRNESS-ETHICS.pptx
JUSTICE-AND-FAIRNESS-ETHICS.pptx
RichieManlimosJr
Utilitarianism is a form ofconsequentialism, which states that the consequences of any action are the only standard of right and wrong. This view can be contrasted or combined with virtue ethics which holds virtue as a moral good. Intrinsic Good & Instrumental Good : Rule-utilitarianism : Rule utilitarianism is a form of utilitarianism that says an action is right as it conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good, or that \"the rightness or wrongness of a particular action is a function of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance. Rights, Legal Rights, Moral Rights, negative rights, positive rights & contractual rights : Legal rights are those bestowed onto a person by a given legal system. Moral rights are rights of creators of copyrighted works generally recognized in civil law jurisdictions and, to a lesser extent, in some common law jurisdictions. They include the right of attribution, the right to have a work published anonymously or pseudonymously, and the right to the integrity of the work. The libertarian view on rights : Natural-rights libertarianism refers to the view that all individuals possess certain natural or moral rights, mainly a right of individual sovereignty, and that therefore acts of initiation of force and fraud are rights-violations and that is sufficient reason to oppose those acts. This is one of the two ethical view points within right-libertarianism, the other being consequentialist libertarianism, which only takes into account the consequences of actions and rules when judging them, and holds that free markets and strong private property rights have good consequences. Distributive Justice, Fundamantal & Material principal of distributive justice Distributive justice concerns the nature of a socially just allocation of goods in a society. A society in which incidental inequalities in outcome do not arise would be considered a society guided by the principles of distributive justice. The concept includes the available quantities of goods, the process by which goods are to be distributed, and the resulting allocation of the goods to the members of the society. Distributive justice is concerned with the fair allocation of resources among diverse members of a community. Fair allocation typically takes into account the total amount of goods to be distributed, the distributing procedure, and the pattern of distribution that results. Various principles might determine of how goods are distributed as under :- Capitalist Justice, Socialist Justice, L justice, : Capitalist Justice is the justice that is supported and served by the capitalist person or individual, one who supports the tenets of capitalism. Socialist Justice is the justice that is supported and served by the socialistlist person or individual, one who supports the tenets of socialism. Principle of equal liberty, Difference Principle, Principle of fair equality of opportunity : Difference Principle : The Difference Principle regulates ineq.
Utilitarianism is a form ofconsequentialism, which states that the c.pdf
Utilitarianism is a form ofconsequentialism, which states that the c.pdf
aptexx
Ethical Theories
Ethical theories
Ethical theories
klfilbert
C) immanuel kant
C) immanuel kant
lawrenceandre
Aquinas
Aquinas
zmiers
Ethics Chapter 2
Ethics Chapter 2
slm1085
education versus the society
Should education promote absolute moral principles in society(1)
Should education promote absolute moral principles in society(1)
University of Johannesburg
by - jemma
Natural law revision notes
Natural law revision notes
FAROUQ
QWERTUGFDGFBVDCS
GEC8-REVIEWERSDFHKIKMCDFVMGOFEMVPOSOF.docx
GEC8-REVIEWERSDFHKIKMCDFVMGOFEMVPOSOF.docx
AbegailSato
Similar to Aquinasandjustice
(20)
G5 kant
G5 kant
Philosopher Overview-Media Ethics
Philosopher Overview-Media Ethics
Chapter 6 Kant Theory
Chapter 6 Kant Theory
Duties and ImperativesThe Ethics of ConflictImmanuel Kan.docx
Duties and ImperativesThe Ethics of ConflictImmanuel Kan.docx
G5 oneil
G5 oneil
Chapter 2 _Session 5 _ 6 _ 7_.pptx
Chapter 2 _Session 5 _ 6 _ 7_.pptx
Week 2 ethical theories ppt
Week 2 ethical theories ppt
Aristoteles
Aristoteles
Kant power point
Kant power point
Answer FOUR questions. Each question is worth 10 points. 1. .docx
Answer FOUR questions. Each question is worth 10 points. 1. .docx
Man and ethics
Man and ethics
JUSTICE-AND-FAIRNESS-ETHICS.pptx
JUSTICE-AND-FAIRNESS-ETHICS.pptx
Utilitarianism is a form ofconsequentialism, which states that the c.pdf
Utilitarianism is a form ofconsequentialism, which states that the c.pdf
Ethical theories
Ethical theories
C) immanuel kant
C) immanuel kant
Aquinas
Aquinas
Ethics Chapter 2
Ethics Chapter 2
Should education promote absolute moral principles in society(1)
Should education promote absolute moral principles in society(1)
Natural law revision notes
Natural law revision notes
GEC8-REVIEWERSDFHKIKMCDFVMGOFEMVPOSOF.docx
GEC8-REVIEWERSDFHKIKMCDFVMGOFEMVPOSOF.docx
More from zmiers
Project World Cultures
Project World Cultures
zmiers
Limits Of Progressivism
Limits Of Progressivism
zmiers
RELIGION
RELIGION
zmiers
Ethicsasse2004
Ethicsasse2004
zmiers
Muinkhoury
Muinkhoury
zmiers
Iraq 6
Iraq 6
zmiers
Iraq 7
Iraq 7
zmiers
Iraq 3
Iraq 3
zmiers
Human Rights Vi Form
Human Rights Vi Form
zmiers
Groups In Society
Groups In Society
zmiers
Globalizationvic
Globalizationvic
zmiers
Globalization, Interdependence And Education
Globalization, Interdependence And Education
zmiers
Freud Jeop
Freud Jeop
zmiers
Globalization
Globalization
zmiers
Fool Me Twice
Fool Me Twice
zmiers
Feral Children Presentation
Feral Children Presentation
zmiers
Evolve 8
Evolve 8
zmiers
Extremismpresentation
Extremismpresentation
zmiers
Evolve 7
Evolve 7
zmiers
Evolve 4
Evolve 4
zmiers
More from zmiers
(20)
Project World Cultures
Project World Cultures
Limits Of Progressivism
Limits Of Progressivism
RELIGION
RELIGION
Ethicsasse2004
Ethicsasse2004
Muinkhoury
Muinkhoury
Iraq 6
Iraq 6
Iraq 7
Iraq 7
Iraq 3
Iraq 3
Human Rights Vi Form
Human Rights Vi Form
Groups In Society
Groups In Society
Globalizationvic
Globalizationvic
Globalization, Interdependence And Education
Globalization, Interdependence And Education
Freud Jeop
Freud Jeop
Globalization
Globalization
Fool Me Twice
Fool Me Twice
Feral Children Presentation
Feral Children Presentation
Evolve 8
Evolve 8
Extremismpresentation
Extremismpresentation
Evolve 7
Evolve 7
Evolve 4
Evolve 4
Aquinasandjustice
1.
Thomas Aquinas JUSTICE
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Download now