Survival Strategies for Managers
•
3 gefällt mir•599 views
Lessons from Sparring Strategies of Successful Fighters - Applied to Management
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (7)
Ähnlich wie Survival Strategies for Managers
Ähnlich wie Survival Strategies for Managers (20)
Mehr von Sanjay Bhatikar Ph.D., PMP
Mehr von Sanjay Bhatikar Ph.D., PMP (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Survival Strategies for Managers
- 1. SURVIVAL STRATEGIES FOR MANAGERS
- 3. THIS IS STRATEGY Though we’ll cover that too, on other days in other places
- 4. THIS IS ABOUT DAILY WEAR AND TEAR
- 5. Anton Chekhov Any it is idiot can this day-to-day face living a crisis that wears you out
- 6. LESSONS FROM
- 7. S S P T A R R A R T I E N G G Y
- 9. BE R A B E
- 10. A fighter with one style is easy to figure out and vanquish
- 11. manager
- 12. WHAT IS STYLE?
- 13. THEY GOT STYLE
- 14. SHE GOT STYLE
- 15. WE GOT STYLE
- 16. TEAM WORKER LEADERSHIP STYLES BASED SOCIAL ACTION- ON BELBIN TEAM ROLES CEREBRAL ORIENTED
- 17. TEAM WORKER DISPLAY MORE THAN ONE STYLE
- 18. LEADER AS ..
- 33. BE A good leader is someone who prefers to cooperate but is also a skilled competitor. Knows the benefits of cooperation in forming NICE alliances; Is appreciative and a positive thinker, confident and flexible. Knows when to compete and isn’t left behind; Is TOUGH capable of out-doing others through competitive action; Is both confident and courageous. FORGIVING Knows when it is necessary to smooth over awkward or rough patches to get back to business; Is confident, compassionate, and fair. CLEAR Knows that the best outcome for all is cooperation; Is clear about this and as a consequence so are others.
- 36. FORGIVING
- 37. CLEAR
- 40. Your fancy mid-air techniques and flying kicks don’t impress me. I am coming at you with my one knock-out punch until I get you. You are going down, punk!
- 41. Use one technique and use it well.
- 42. WHAT ONE TECHNIQUE?
- 48. Otherwise he was always with people in a meeting
- 50. A meeting to prepare a statement, an announcement, or a press release
- 51. A meeting to make an announcement— for example, an organizational change
- 52. A meeting in which one member reports
- 53. A meeting in which several or all members report
- 54. A meeting to inform the convening executive
- 55. A meeting whose only function is to allow the participants to be in the executive’s presence
- 56. PETER DRUCKER What Makes an Effective Executive The key to running an effective meeting is to decide in advance what kind of meeting it will be. Different kinds of meetings require different forms of preparation and different results: A meeting to prepare a statement, an announcement, or a press release. For this to be productive, one member has to prepare a draft beforehand. At the meeting’s end, a pre-appointed member has to take responsibility for disseminating the final text. A meeting to make an announcement—for example, an organizational change. This meeting should be confined to the announcement and a discussion about it. A meeting in which one member reports. Nothing but the report should he discussed. A meeting in which several or all members report. Either there should be no discussion at all or the discussion should be limited to questions for clarification. Alternatively, for each report there could be a short discussion in which all participants may ask questions. If this is the format, the reports should be distributed to all participants well before the meeting. At this kind of meeting, each report should be limited to a preset time—for example, 15 minutes. A meeting to inform the convening executive. The executive should listen and ask questions. He or she should sum up but not make a presentation. A meeting whose only function is to allow the participants to be in the executive’s presence. Cardinal Spellman’s breakfast and dinner meetings were of that kind. There is no way to make these meetings productive. They are the penalties of rank. Senior executives are effective to the extent to which they can prevent such meetings from encroaching on their workdays. Spellman, for instance, was effective in large part because he confined such meetings to breakfast and dinner and kept the rest of his working day free of them.
- 62. THINK STRATEGY
- 65. Senior Manager Monsanto Sanjay Bhatikar, PhD Bangalore, INDIA sanjay.bhatikar@gmail.com
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Be unpredictableHow?Develop a repertoire of stylesShift between stylesBelbin’s modelMirror the opponent’s styleNature thrives on mimicryImitation is the sincerest form of flattery.Observe. Imitate.[He whines. You sympathize.She is enthusiastic. You stoke her passion.He is passive. You wait.She is aggressive. You assert.]One-trick pony – live point to pointLive meeting to meeting.
- What is style?
- Belbin’s styles – Team Roles
- A good leader is someone who prefers to cooperate but is also a skilled competitor. A good leader is a nice, tough, forgiving, and clear person:Nice – The good leader knows the benefits of cooperation in forming alliances. They are appreciative, positive thinkers that are confident and flexible.Tough – They know when to compete. They aren’t left behind; they are capable of out doing others through competitive action. They are both confident and courageous.Forgiving – The good leader knows when it is necessary to smooth over awkward or rough patches to get back to business. They are confident, compassionate, and fair.Clear – The good leader knows that the best outcome for all is cooperation. They are clear about this and as a consequence so are others. They are confident, fair and honest leaders.
- The most visible, powerful, and, arguably, effective non-governmental executive in the America of World War II and the years thereafter was not a businessman. It was Francis Cardinal Spellman, the head of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York and adviser to several U.S. presidents. When Spellman took over, the diocese was bankrupt and totally demoralized. It's successor inherited the leadership position in the American Catholic church. Spellman often said that during his waking hours he was alone only twice each day, for 25 minutes each time: when he said Mass in his private chapel after getting up in the morning and when he said his evening prayers before going to bed. Otherwise he was always with people in a meeting, starting at breakfast with one Catholic organization and ending at dinner with another.
- The key to running an effective meeting is to decide in advance what kind of meeting it will be. Different kinds of meetings require different forms of preparation and different results: A meeting to prepare a statement, an announcement, or a press release. For this to be productive, one member has to prepare a draft beforehand. At the meeting’s end, a pre-appointed member has to take responsibility for disseminating the final text. A meeting to make an announcement—for example, an organizational change. This meeting should be confined to the announcement and a discussion about it. A meeting in which one member reports. Nothing but the report should he discussed. A meeting in which several or all members report. Either there should be no discussion at all or the discussion should be limited to questions for clarification. Alternatively, for each report there could be a short discussion in which all participants may ask questions. If this is the format, the reports should be distributed to all participants well before the meeting. At this kind of meeting, each report should be limited to a preset time—for example, 15 minutes. A meeting to inform the convening executive. The executive should listen and ask questions. He or she should sum up but not make a presentation. A meeting whose only function is to allow the participants to be in the executive’s presence. Cardinal Spellman’s breakfast and dinner meetings were of that kind. There is no way to make these meetings productive. They are the penalties of rank. Senior executives are effective to the extent to which they can prevent such meetings from encroaching on their workdays. Spellman, for instance, was effective in large part because he confined such meetings to breakfast and dinner and kept the rest of his working day free of them.
- The key to running an effective meeting is to decide in advance what kind of meeting it will be. Different kinds of meetings require different forms of preparation and different results: A meeting to prepare a statement, an announcement, or a press release. For this to be productive, one member has to prepare a draft beforehand. At the meeting’s end, a pre-appointed member has to take responsibility for disseminating the final text. A meeting to make an announcement—for example, an organizational change. This meeting should be confined to the announcement and a discussion about it. A meeting in which one member reports. Nothing but the report should he discussed. A meeting in which several or all members report. Either there should be no discussion at all or the discussion should be limited to questions for clarification. Alternatively, for each report there could be a short discussion in which all participants may ask questions. If this is the format, the reports should be distributed to all participants well before the meeting. At this kind of meeting, each report should be limited to a preset time—for example, 15 minutes. A meeting to inform the convening executive. The executive should listen and ask questions. He or she should sum up but not make a presentation. A meeting whose only function is to allow the participants to be in the executive’s presence. Cardinal Spellman’s breakfast and dinner meetings were of that kind. There is no way to make these meetings productive. They are the penalties of rank. Senior executives are effective to the extent to which they can prevent such meetings from encroaching on their workdays. Spellman, for instance, was effective in large part because he confined such meetings to breakfast and dinner and kept the rest of his working day free of them.
- The key to running an effective meeting is to decide in advance what kind of meeting it will be. Different kinds of meetings require different forms of preparation and different results: A meeting to prepare a statement, an announcement, or a press release. For this to be productive, one member has to prepare a draft beforehand. At the meeting’s end, a pre-appointed member has to take responsibility for disseminating the final text. A meeting to make an announcement—for example, an organizational change. This meeting should be confined to the announcement and a discussion about it. A meeting in which one member reports. Nothing but the report should he discussed. A meeting in which several or all members report. Either there should be no discussion at all or the discussion should be limited to questions for clarification. Alternatively, for each report there could be a short discussion in which all participants may ask questions. If this is the format, the reports should be distributed to all participants well before the meeting. At this kind of meeting, each report should be limited to a preset time—for example, 15 minutes. A meeting to inform the convening executive. The executive should listen and ask questions. He or she should sum up but not make a presentation. A meeting whose only function is to allow the participants to be in the executive’s presence. Cardinal Spellman’s breakfast and dinner meetings were of that kind. There is no way to make these meetings productive. They are the penalties of rank. Senior executives are effective to the extent to which they can prevent such meetings from encroaching on their workdays. Spellman, for instance, was effective in large part because he confined such meetings to breakfast and dinner and kept the rest of his working day free of them.
- The key to running an effective meeting is to decide in advance what kind of meeting it will be. Different kinds of meetings require different forms of preparation and different results: A meeting to prepare a statement, an announcement, or a press release. For this to be productive, one member has to prepare a draft beforehand. At the meeting’s end, a pre-appointed member has to take responsibility for disseminating the final text. A meeting to make an announcement—for example, an organizational change. This meeting should be confined to the announcement and a discussion about it. A meeting in which one member reports. Nothing but the report should he discussed. A meeting in which several or all members report. Either there should be no discussion at all or the discussion should be limited to questions for clarification. Alternatively, for each report there could be a short discussion in which all participants may ask questions. If this is the format, the reports should be distributed to all participants well before the meeting. At this kind of meeting, each report should be limited to a preset time—for example, 15 minutes. A meeting to inform the convening executive. The executive should listen and ask questions. He or she should sum up but not make a presentation. A meeting whose only function is to allow the participants to be in the executive’s presence. Cardinal Spellman’s breakfast and dinner meetings were of that kind. There is no way to make these meetings productive. They are the penalties of rank. Senior executives are effective to the extent to which they can prevent such meetings from encroaching on their workdays. Spellman, for instance, was effective in large part because he confined such meetings to breakfast and dinner and kept the rest of his working day free of them.
- The key to running an effective meeting is to decide in advance what kind of meeting it will be. Different kinds of meetings require different forms of preparation and different results: A meeting to prepare a statement, an announcement, or a press release. For this to be productive, one member has to prepare a draft beforehand. At the meeting’s end, a pre-appointed member has to take responsibility for disseminating the final text. A meeting to make an announcement—for example, an organizational change. This meeting should be confined to the announcement and a discussion about it. A meeting in which one member reports. Nothing but the report should he discussed. A meeting in which several or all members report. Either there should be no discussion at all or the discussion should be limited to questions for clarification. Alternatively, for each report there could be a short discussion in which all participants may ask questions. If this is the format, the reports should be distributed to all participants well before the meeting. At this kind of meeting, each report should be limited to a preset time—for example, 15 minutes. A meeting to inform the convening executive. The executive should listen and ask questions. He or she should sum up but not make a presentation. A meeting whose only function is to allow the participants to be in the executive’s presence. Cardinal Spellman’s breakfast and dinner meetings were of that kind. There is no way to make these meetings productive. They are the penalties of rank. Senior executives are effective to the extent to which they can prevent such meetings from encroaching on their workdays. Spellman, for instance, was effective in large part because he confined such meetings to breakfast and dinner and kept the rest of his working day free of them.
- The key to running an effective meeting is to decide in advance what kind of meeting it will be. Different kinds of meetings require different forms of preparation and different results: A meeting to prepare a statement, an announcement, or a press release. For this to be productive, one member has to prepare a draft beforehand. At the meeting’s end, a pre-appointed member has to take responsibility for disseminating the final text. A meeting to make an announcement—for example, an organizational change. This meeting should be confined to the announcement and a discussion about it. A meeting in which one member reports. Nothing but the report should he discussed. A meeting in which several or all members report. Either there should be no discussion at all or the discussion should be limited to questions for clarification. Alternatively, for each report there could be a short discussion in which all participants may ask questions. If this is the format, the reports should be distributed to all participants well before the meeting. At this kind of meeting, each report should be limited to a preset time—for example, 15 minutes. A meeting to inform the convening executive. The executive should listen and ask questions. He or she should sum up but not make a presentation. A meeting whose only function is to allow the participants to be in the executive’s presence. Cardinal Spellman’s breakfast and dinner meetings were of that kind. There is no way to make these meetings productive. They are the penalties of rank. Senior executives are effective to the extent to which they can prevent such meetings from encroaching on their workdays. Spellman, for instance, was effective in large part because he confined such meetings to breakfast and dinner and kept the rest of his working day free of them.