SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 6
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Asif Tufal
www.lawteacher.net
1
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION
THE PROBLEM OF INTERPRETATION SOLUTIONS
F.A.R. Bennion (Statute Law, 1990), has identified a
number of factors that may cause doubt:
1. The draftsman may refrain from using certain
words that he or she regards as necessarily
implied. The problem here is that the users
may not realise that this is the case.
2. The draftsman may use a broad term (“a word
or phrase of wide meaning”) and leave it to
the user to judge what situations fall within it.
3. Ambiguous words may be used.
4. There may be unforeseeable developments.
5. There are many ways in which the wording
may be inadequate. There may be a printing
error, a drafting error or another error.
General methods of statutory interpretation have been
developed by the judges.
The Interpretation Act 1978 only provides certain
standard definitions of common provisions, eg, “he”
includes “she”, and thereby enables statutes to be
drafted more briefly than otherwise would be the case.
Modern statutes commonly include “definition
sections” in which the meaning of words and phrases
found in the statute are explained, eg ss2-6 of the Theft
Act 1968 explain the elements of the offence in s1.
Explanatory Notes have been published for new Acts
since 1999.
THE RULES OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION
RULE CASE EXAMPLE COMMENTARY
1. Literal
By the literal rule, words in a
statute must be given their plain,
ordinary or literal meaning. The
objective of the court is to discover
the intention of Parliament as
expressed in the words used. This
approach will be used even if it
produces absurdity or hardship, in
which case the remedy is for
Parliament to pass an amending
statute.
One of the leading statements of
the literal rule was made by Tindal
CJ in the Sussex Peerage Case
(1844) 11 Cl&Fin 85:
“… the only rule for the
construction of Acts of Parliament
is, that they should be construed
according to the intent of the
Parliament which passed the Act.
If the words of the statute are in
themselves precise and
unambiguous, then no more can be
necessary than to expound those
words in their natural and ordinary
sense. The words themselves alone
do, in such case, best declare the
intention of the lawgiver.”
Lord Esher in R v Judge of the City
Whiteley v Chappell (1868) LR 4
QB 147.
The defendant pretended to be
someone who had recently died in
order to use that person’s vote. It
was an offence to “personate any
person entitled to vote”. As dead
people cannot vote, the defendant
was held not to have committed an
offence.
London & North Eastern Railway
v Berriman [1946] AC 278.
The claimant’s husband was killed
while oiling points along a railway
line. Compensation was only
payable if he had been “relaying or
repairing” the line. The HL held
oiling points was maintaining the
line and not “relaying or repairing”.
Cutter v Eagle Star Insurance
[1998] 4 All ER 417.
The claimant was sitting in his
friend’s car in a car park and was
injured when a can of lighter fuel
exploded. The driver was insured,
as required by the Road Traffic Act
1988, for injury caused while on a
“road”. The HL held that the car
park was not a road because a road
provides for cars to move along it
to a destination. Therefore, the
3It encourages draftsmen to be
precise.
3It respects the words used by
Parliament.
3It prevents judges “rewriting”
statute law, which only Parliament
can do.
3Alternative approaches would
make it difficult to predict how
doubtful provisions might be
“rewritten” by judges.
7Judges have tended excessively
to emphasise the literal meaning of
statutory provisions without giving
due weight to their meaning in
wider contexts.
7It assumes that parliamentary
draftsmen are perfect.
7 It ignores the limitations of
language.
7It can lead to absurd or harsh
decisions and Parliament has to
pass an amending statute.
Asif Tufal
www.lawteacher.net
2
of London Court [1892] 1 QB 273
said:
“If the words of an Act are clear
then you must follow them even
though they lead to a manifest
absurdity. The court has nothing to
do with the question whether the
legislature has committed an
absurdity.”
insurance company was not liable
to pay out on the driver’s policy
because the claimant had not been
injured due to the use of the car on
a “road”.
2. Golden
The golden rule provides that if the
words used are ambiguous the
court should adopt an interpretation
which avoids an absurd result. In
Grey v Pearson (1857) 6 HL Cas
61, Lord Wensleydale said:
“… the grammatical and ordinary
sense of the words is to be adhered
to, unless that would lead to some
absurdity, or some repugnance or
inconsistency with the rest of the
instrument, in which case the
grammatical and ordinary sense of
the words may be modified, so as
to avoid that absurdity and
inconsistency, but no farther.”
This became known as “Lord
Wensleydale’s golden rule”.
In its second, broader sense, the
court may modify the reading of
words in order to avoid a repugnant
situation as in Re Sigsworth (1935).
R v Allen (1872) LR 1 CCR 367
The defendant was married and
married again. It was an offence
for a married person to “marry”
again unless they were widowed or
divorced. When caught the
defendant argued that he did not
commit this offence as the law
regarded his second marriage as
invalid. The court held that the
word “marry” could also mean a
person who “goes through a
ceremony of marriage” and so the
defendant was guilty.
Re Sigsworth [1935] Ch 89.
The defendant had murdered his
mother. She did not have a will
and he stood to inherit her estate as
next of kin, by being her “issue”.
The court applied the golden rule
and held that “issue” would not be
entitled to inherit where they had
killed the deceased.
Adler v George[1964] 2 QB 7.
It was an offence to obstruct HM
Forces “in the vicinity of ” a
prohibited place. The defendants
had obstructed HM Forces in a
prohibited place (an army base) and
argued that they were not liable.
The court found them guilty as “in
the vicinity of” meant near or in the
place.
3It allows judges to avoid absurd
or harsh results which would be
produced by a literal reading.
3It allows judges to avoid
repugnant situations, as in Re
Sigsworth.
7There is clear way to test the
existence of absurdity,
inconsistency or inconvenience, or
to measure their quality or extent.
7Judges can “rewrite” statute law,
which only Parliament is allowed
to do.
3. Mischief
The mischief rule is contained in
Heydon's Case (1584) 3 Co Rep 7,
and allows the court to look at the
state of the former law in order to
discover the mischief in it which
the present statute was designed to
remedy.
The court stated that for the true
interpretation of all statutes four
things are to be considered:
Smith v Hughes (1960) 2 All ER
859.
Six women had been charged with
soliciting “in a street or public
place for the purpose of
prostitution”. However, one
woman had been on a balcony and
others behind the windows of
ground floor rooms. The court held
they were guilty because the
mischief aimed at was people being
molested or solicited by prostitutes.
4It allows judges to put into effect
the remedy Parliament chose to
cure a problem in the common law.
4It was developed at a time when:
statutes were a minor source of
law; drafting was not as precise as
today and before Parliamentary
supremacy was established.
7Judges can “rewrite” statute law,
which only Parliament is allowed
Asif Tufal
www.lawteacher.net
3
1st. What was the common
law before the making of the Act.
2nd. What was the mischief
and defect for which the common
law did not provide.
3rd. What remedy Parliament
resolved and appointed to cure the
disease.
4th. The true reason of the
remedy; and then the function of
the judge is to make such
construction as shall supress the
mischief and advance the remedy.
Royal College of Nursing v DHSS
[1981] 1 All ER 545.
The Abortion Act 1967 allows
abortions by “a registered medical
practitioner”. Doctors carried out
the first part of the procedure and
the second was performed by
nurses but without a doctor being
present. The HL held (by 3-2) that
this procedure was lawful because
the mischief Parliament was trying
to remedy was back street abortions
performed by unqualified people.
Corkery v Carpenter [1951] 1 KB
102.
A person could be arrested if found
drunk in charge of a “carriage” on
the highway. The defendant had
been arrested for being drunk in
charge of a bicycle on the highway.
The court held that a bicycle was a
“carriage” for the purposes of the
Act because the mischief aimed at
was drunken persons on the
highway in charge of some form of
transport, and so the defendant was
properly arrested.
DPP v Bull [1994] 4 All ER 411.
A man had been charged with
loitering or soliciting in a street or
public place for the purpose of
prostitution. The court held that
the term “prostitute” was limited to
female prostitutes. The mischief
the Street Offences Act 1959 was
intended to remedy was a mischief
created by women.
to do.
7It must be possible to discover
the mischief in order for this rule to
be used.
4. Purposive
The purposive approach is one that
will “promote the general
legislative purpose underlying the
provisions” (per Lord Denning MR
in Notham v London Boroughof
Barnet [1978] 1 WLR 220). There
will be a comparison of readings of
the provision in question based on
the literal or grammatical meaning
of words with readings based on a
purposive approach.
In Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v
Hart [1993] AC 593, Lord Browne-
Wilkinson referred to “the
purposive approach to construction
now adopted by the courts in order
to give effect to the true intentions
Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997]
2 All ER 406.
The complainant suffered racial
abuse at work, which he claimed
amounted to racial discrimination
for which the employers were
liable under s32 of the Race
Relations Act 1976. The CA
applied the purposive approach and
held that the acts of discrimination
were committed “in the course of
employment”. Any other
interpretation ran counter to the
whole legislative scheme and
underlying policy of s32.
4It gives effect to the true
intentions of Parliament.
7It can only be used if a judge can
find Parliament’s intention in the
statute or Parliamentary material.
7 Judges can “rewrite” statute law,
which only Parliament is allowed
to do.
Asif Tufal
www.lawteacher.net
4
of the legislature”.
5. Integrated
Sir Rupert Cross, Statutory
Interpretation (3rd ed, 1995),
suggested that there was a unified
approach to interpretation:
(i) the judge begins by using the
grammatical and ordinary or
technical meaning of the context of
the statute;
(ii) if this produces an absurd result
then the judge may apply any
secondary meaning possible;
(iii) the judge may imply words
into the statute or alter or ignore
words to prevent a provision from
being unintelligible, unworkable or
absurd; and
(iv) in applying these rules the
judge may resort to various aids
and presumptions.
THE RULES OF LANGUAGE
RULE CASE EXAMPLE
1. Ejusdem generis (of the same kind)
General words following particular words will be
interpreted in the light of the particular ones.
Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse [1899] AC 143.
It was an offence to use a “house, office, room or other
place for betting”. The defendant was operating from
a place outdoors. The court held that “other place” had
to refer to other indoor places because the words in the
list were indoor places and so he was not guilty.
2. Noscitur a sociis (known from associates)
A word will be interpreted in the context of
surrounding words.
Muir v Keay (1875) LR 10 QB 594.
All houses kept open at night for “public refreshment,
resort and entertainment” had to be licensed. The
defendant argued that his café did not need a licence
because he did not provide entertainment. The court
held that “entertainment” did not mean musical
entertainment but the reception and accommodation of
people, so the defendant was guilty.
3. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius (the express
mention of one thing is the exclusion of another)
The express mention of things in a list excludes those
things not mentioned.
Tempest v Kilner (1846) 3 CB 249.
A statute required that contracts for the sale of “goods,
wares and merchandise” of £10 or more had to be
evidenced in writing. The court had to decide if this
applied to a contract for the sale of stocks and shares.
The court held that the statute did not apply because
stocks and shares were not mentioned.
Asif Tufal
www.lawteacher.net
5
INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AIDS TO INTERPRETATION
There is a wide range of material that may be considered by a judge when interpreting statutes. Some of these
aids may be found within the statute in question, others are external to the statute.
INTERNAL EXTERNAL
1. Other enacting words
An examination of the whole of a statute, or relevant
Parts, may indicate the overall purpose of the
legislation. It may show that a particular interpretation
of that provision will lead to absurdity when taken
with another section.
2. Long Title
The long title should be read as part of the context, “as
the plainest of all the guides to the general objectives
of a statute” (per Lord Simon in The Black-Clawson
Case [1975]).
3. Preamble
When there is a preamble it is will generally state the
mischief to be remedied and the scope of the Act. It is
therefore clearly permissible to use it as an aid to
construing the enacting provisions.
4. Short Title
There is some question whether the short title should
be used to resolve doubt.
5. Headings, side-notes and punctuation
Headings, side-notes and punctuation may be
considered as part of the context.
1. Dictionaries and other literary sources
Dictionaries are commonly consulted as a guide to the
meaning of statutory words. Textbooks may also be
consulted.
2. Practice
The practice followed in the past may be a guide to
interpretation. For example, the practice of eminent
conveyancers where the technical meaning of a word
or phrase used in conveyancing is in issue.
3. Other Statutes in Pari Materia
Related statutes dealing with the same subject matter
as the provision in question may be considered both as
part of the context and to resolve ambiguities. A
statute may provide expressly that it should be read as
one with an earlier statute(s).
4. Official Reports
Legislation may be preceded by a report of a Royal
Commission, the Law Commissions or some other
official advisory committee. These reports may be
considered as evidence of the pre-existing state of the
law and the “mischief” with which the legislation was
intended to deal. However, it has been held that the
recommendations contained in them may not be
regarded as evidence of Parliamentary intention as
Parliament may not have accepted the
recommendations and acted upon them (The Black-
Clawson Case [1975] AC 591).
5. Treaties and International Conventions
There is a presumption that Parliament does not
legislate in such a way that the UK would be in breach
of its international obligations.
6. Parliamentary Materials/Hansard
In Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart [1993] AC 593,
the House of Lords relaxed the general prohibition (in
Davis v Johnson [1979] AC 264) that a court may not
refer to Parliamentary materials, such as reports of
debates in the House and in committee (Hansard) and
the explanatory memoranda attached to Bills, when
interpreting statutes. They may now be used where:
(a) legislation is ambiguous or obscure, or leads to an
absurdity;
(b) the material relied on consists of one or more
statements by a minister or other promoter of the Bill
together if necessary with such other parliamentary
material asis necessary to understand such statements
and their effect; and
(c) the statements relied on are clear.
Asif Tufal
www.lawteacher.net
6
PRESUMPTIONS
PRESUMPTION CASE EXAMPLE
1. Presumption against changes in the common law
2. Presumption against ousting the jurisdiction of the
courts
3. Presumption against interference with vested rights
4. Strict construction of penal laws in favour of the
citizen
5. Presumption against retrospective operation
6. Presumption that statutes do no affect the Crown
7. Others

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptxUNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptxketan349068
 
Pengantar Hukum Internasional - North Sea Continental Shelf Case
Pengantar Hukum Internasional  - North Sea Continental Shelf CasePengantar Hukum Internasional  - North Sea Continental Shelf Case
Pengantar Hukum Internasional - North Sea Continental Shelf CaseMariske Myeke Tampi
 
Statutory interpretation
Statutory interpretationStatutory interpretation
Statutory interpretationLegalEyres
 
Code of civil procedure 1908 res subjudice and res judicata
Code of civil procedure 1908 res subjudice and res judicataCode of civil procedure 1908 res subjudice and res judicata
Code of civil procedure 1908 res subjudice and res judicataDr. Vikas Khakare
 
Plea bargaining
Plea bargainingPlea bargaining
Plea bargainingvidyaAR2
 
7118910 interpretation-of-statutes
7118910 interpretation-of-statutes7118910 interpretation-of-statutes
7118910 interpretation-of-statutesAditya Singh
 
Extenal aids to construction of Law
Extenal aids to construction of LawExtenal aids to construction of Law
Extenal aids to construction of LawTejas Shah
 
Mischief Rule Lesson Powerpoint
Mischief Rule Lesson PowerpointMischief Rule Lesson Powerpoint
Mischief Rule Lesson Powerpointshummi
 
Strict interpretation [penal]
Strict interpretation [penal]Strict interpretation [penal]
Strict interpretation [penal]SUBHAM AGRAWAL
 
Immovable Property in Private international Law
Immovable Property in Private international LawImmovable Property in Private international Law
Immovable Property in Private international Lawcarolineelias239
 
Mischief rule of interpretation
Mischief rule of interpretationMischief rule of interpretation
Mischief rule of interpretationAfiyaShaikh7
 
Conduct of arbitral proceeding vaibhav goyal
Conduct of arbitral proceeding vaibhav goyalConduct of arbitral proceeding vaibhav goyal
Conduct of arbitral proceeding vaibhav goyalVaibhav Goyal
 
Torts in Private international law
Torts in Private international lawTorts in Private international law
Torts in Private international lawcarolineelias239
 
Codification of international law
Codification of international lawCodification of international law
Codification of international lawNeepa Jani Vyas
 
Statutory interpretation – the golden rule
Statutory interpretation – the golden ruleStatutory interpretation – the golden rule
Statutory interpretation – the golden ruleJoanne Arthur
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptxUNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
UNIT 3 - External Aids to the Construction.pptx
 
Pengantar Hukum Internasional - North Sea Continental Shelf Case
Pengantar Hukum Internasional  - North Sea Continental Shelf CasePengantar Hukum Internasional  - North Sea Continental Shelf Case
Pengantar Hukum Internasional - North Sea Continental Shelf Case
 
Statutory interpretation
Statutory interpretationStatutory interpretation
Statutory interpretation
 
Code of civil procedure 1908 res subjudice and res judicata
Code of civil procedure 1908 res subjudice and res judicataCode of civil procedure 1908 res subjudice and res judicata
Code of civil procedure 1908 res subjudice and res judicata
 
Literal rule
Literal ruleLiteral rule
Literal rule
 
Plea bargaining
Plea bargainingPlea bargaining
Plea bargaining
 
Plea bargaining
Plea bargainingPlea bargaining
Plea bargaining
 
Noscitor a sociis
Noscitor a sociisNoscitor a sociis
Noscitor a sociis
 
7118910 interpretation-of-statutes
7118910 interpretation-of-statutes7118910 interpretation-of-statutes
7118910 interpretation-of-statutes
 
Extenal aids to construction of Law
Extenal aids to construction of LawExtenal aids to construction of Law
Extenal aids to construction of Law
 
Mischief Rule Lesson Powerpoint
Mischief Rule Lesson PowerpointMischief Rule Lesson Powerpoint
Mischief Rule Lesson Powerpoint
 
Mischief rule
Mischief ruleMischief rule
Mischief rule
 
Strict interpretation [penal]
Strict interpretation [penal]Strict interpretation [penal]
Strict interpretation [penal]
 
Immovable Property in Private international Law
Immovable Property in Private international LawImmovable Property in Private international Law
Immovable Property in Private international Law
 
Mischief rule of interpretation
Mischief rule of interpretationMischief rule of interpretation
Mischief rule of interpretation
 
Purposive rule
Purposive rulePurposive rule
Purposive rule
 
Conduct of arbitral proceeding vaibhav goyal
Conduct of arbitral proceeding vaibhav goyalConduct of arbitral proceeding vaibhav goyal
Conduct of arbitral proceeding vaibhav goyal
 
Torts in Private international law
Torts in Private international lawTorts in Private international law
Torts in Private international law
 
Codification of international law
Codification of international lawCodification of international law
Codification of international law
 
Statutory interpretation – the golden rule
Statutory interpretation – the golden ruleStatutory interpretation – the golden rule
Statutory interpretation – the golden rule
 

Andere mochten auch

Statutory Interpretation - approaches and rules applied
Statutory Interpretation - approaches and rules appliedStatutory Interpretation - approaches and rules applied
Statutory Interpretation - approaches and rules appliedRonit Himatlal
 
Chapter 1 introdution to interpretation of statutes
Chapter 1 introdution to interpretation of statutesChapter 1 introdution to interpretation of statutes
Chapter 1 introdution to interpretation of statutesAsmatullah Kakar
 
Overview of Statutory Interpretation
Overview of Statutory InterpretationOverview of Statutory Interpretation
Overview of Statutory InterpretationAmjad Ali
 
Interpretation of Statutes and Agreements in India
Interpretation of Statutes and Agreements in IndiaInterpretation of Statutes and Agreements in India
Interpretation of Statutes and Agreements in IndiaAnil Chawla
 
Introduction to Statutory Interpretation
Introduction to Statutory InterpretationIntroduction to Statutory Interpretation
Introduction to Statutory Interpretationthorogl01
 
Internal aids to interpretation of law
Internal aids to interpretation of lawInternal aids to interpretation of law
Internal aids to interpretation of lawTejas Shah
 
Purposive Approach Revision
Purposive Approach Revision Purposive Approach Revision
Purposive Approach Revision shummi
 
Statutory Interpretation Revision
Statutory Interpretation RevisionStatutory Interpretation Revision
Statutory Interpretation Revisionshummi
 
Statutory Interpretation 4
Statutory Interpretation 4Statutory Interpretation 4
Statutory Interpretation 4thorogl01
 
Interpretation of tax statues
Interpretation of tax statuesInterpretation of tax statues
Interpretation of tax statuesDhruv Seth
 
Interpretation of Taxing Statutes
Interpretation of Taxing StatutesInterpretation of Taxing Statutes
Interpretation of Taxing StatutesBhavik Dholakia
 
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatise
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatiseInterpretation of statutes_a_treatise
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatiseAditya Singh
 
Statutory Interpretation 2
Statutory Interpretation 2Statutory Interpretation 2
Statutory Interpretation 2thorogl01
 
Lecture 1 statutory interpretation on Literal Rule
Lecture 1 statutory interpretation on Literal RuleLecture 1 statutory interpretation on Literal Rule
Lecture 1 statutory interpretation on Literal Ruleshummi
 
Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)
Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)
Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)Muhammad Ijaz Syed
 
Maxims of equity
Maxims of equityMaxims of equity
Maxims of equityFAROUQ
 
1.1 introduction to economics
1.1 introduction to economics1.1 introduction to economics
1.1 introduction to economicsdstuhin
 
Chapter 14 Managing Employee Benefits
Chapter 14 Managing Employee BenefitsChapter 14 Managing Employee Benefits
Chapter 14 Managing Employee BenefitsRayman Soe
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Statutory Interpretation - approaches and rules applied
Statutory Interpretation - approaches and rules appliedStatutory Interpretation - approaches and rules applied
Statutory Interpretation - approaches and rules applied
 
Chapter 1 introdution to interpretation of statutes
Chapter 1 introdution to interpretation of statutesChapter 1 introdution to interpretation of statutes
Chapter 1 introdution to interpretation of statutes
 
Overview of Statutory Interpretation
Overview of Statutory InterpretationOverview of Statutory Interpretation
Overview of Statutory Interpretation
 
Interpretation of law
Interpretation of law Interpretation of law
Interpretation of law
 
Interpretation of Statutes and Agreements in India
Interpretation of Statutes and Agreements in IndiaInterpretation of Statutes and Agreements in India
Interpretation of Statutes and Agreements in India
 
Introduction to Statutory Interpretation
Introduction to Statutory InterpretationIntroduction to Statutory Interpretation
Introduction to Statutory Interpretation
 
Internal aids to interpretation of law
Internal aids to interpretation of lawInternal aids to interpretation of law
Internal aids to interpretation of law
 
Statutory construction
Statutory constructionStatutory construction
Statutory construction
 
Purposive Approach Revision
Purposive Approach Revision Purposive Approach Revision
Purposive Approach Revision
 
Statutory Interpretation Revision
Statutory Interpretation RevisionStatutory Interpretation Revision
Statutory Interpretation Revision
 
Statutory Interpretation 4
Statutory Interpretation 4Statutory Interpretation 4
Statutory Interpretation 4
 
Interpretation of tax statues
Interpretation of tax statuesInterpretation of tax statues
Interpretation of tax statues
 
Interpretation of Taxing Statutes
Interpretation of Taxing StatutesInterpretation of Taxing Statutes
Interpretation of Taxing Statutes
 
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatise
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatiseInterpretation of statutes_a_treatise
Interpretation of statutes_a_treatise
 
Statutory Interpretation 2
Statutory Interpretation 2Statutory Interpretation 2
Statutory Interpretation 2
 
Lecture 1 statutory interpretation on Literal Rule
Lecture 1 statutory interpretation on Literal RuleLecture 1 statutory interpretation on Literal Rule
Lecture 1 statutory interpretation on Literal Rule
 
Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)
Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)
Interpretation of Statutes (English Law)
 
Maxims of equity
Maxims of equityMaxims of equity
Maxims of equity
 
1.1 introduction to economics
1.1 introduction to economics1.1 introduction to economics
1.1 introduction to economics
 
Chapter 14 Managing Employee Benefits
Chapter 14 Managing Employee BenefitsChapter 14 Managing Employee Benefits
Chapter 14 Managing Employee Benefits
 

Ähnlich wie Statutory interpretation

Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resourcelawexchange.co.uk
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resourcelawexchange.co.uk
 
VAIBHAV KUMAR GARG (77)-Legal English and Research Methodology .pptx
VAIBHAV KUMAR GARG (77)-Legal English and Research Methodology .pptxVAIBHAV KUMAR GARG (77)-Legal English and Research Methodology .pptx
VAIBHAV KUMAR GARG (77)-Legal English and Research Methodology .pptxSajjanKumar75
 
Principle of Interpretation
Principle of InterpretationPrinciple of Interpretation
Principle of InterpretationUllas krishnan
 
Els assignment presentation
Els assignment presentationEls assignment presentation
Els assignment presentationrainnie290
 
Golden rule and quick RECAP of Literal Rule
Golden rule and quick RECAP of Literal RuleGolden rule and quick RECAP of Literal Rule
Golden rule and quick RECAP of Literal Ruleshummi
 
The Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In Democracy
The Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In DemocracyThe Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In Democracy
The Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In DemocracyHolly Schulz
 
Rules of statutary interpretation PPT By Rajashree J Jawale
Rules of statutary interpretation PPT By Rajashree J JawaleRules of statutary interpretation PPT By Rajashree J Jawale
Rules of statutary interpretation PPT By Rajashree J Jawalesundarsasane
 
Re examining the theory of savigny, the theory of acquired
Re   examining the theory of savigny, the theory of acquiredRe   examining the theory of savigny, the theory of acquired
Re examining the theory of savigny, the theory of acquiredAlexander Decker
 
Rules of Interpretation overview of law and presentation
Rules of Interpretation overview of law and presentationRules of Interpretation overview of law and presentation
Rules of Interpretation overview of law and presentationShankaranRaman2
 
Assignment on Interpretation of Statutes in Common Law and Civil Law System 0...
Assignment on Interpretation of Statutes in Common Law and Civil Law System 0...Assignment on Interpretation of Statutes in Common Law and Civil Law System 0...
Assignment on Interpretation of Statutes in Common Law and Civil Law System 0...Asian Paint Bangladesh Ltd
 
Has the Human Rights Act (1998) led to a more pronounced judicial interventio...
Has the Human Rights Act (1998) led to a more pronounced judicial interventio...Has the Human Rights Act (1998) led to a more pronounced judicial interventio...
Has the Human Rights Act (1998) led to a more pronounced judicial interventio...Sabita Amin
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resourcelawexchange.co.uk
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resourcelawexchange.co.uk
 
Common Law And The Legal System
Common Law And The Legal SystemCommon Law And The Legal System
Common Law And The Legal SystemStephanie Benjamin
 
Bodenheimer and the theories of adjudication
Bodenheimer and the theories of adjudicationBodenheimer and the theories of adjudication
Bodenheimer and the theories of adjudicationWajid Ali Kharal
 
Unisa constitutional law assignment
Unisa constitutional law assignmentUnisa constitutional law assignment
Unisa constitutional law assignmentGibson Mateyu
 

Ähnlich wie Statutory interpretation (20)

Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
VAIBHAV KUMAR GARG (77)-Legal English and Research Methodology .pptx
VAIBHAV KUMAR GARG (77)-Legal English and Research Methodology .pptxVAIBHAV KUMAR GARG (77)-Legal English and Research Methodology .pptx
VAIBHAV KUMAR GARG (77)-Legal English and Research Methodology .pptx
 
Principle of Interpretation
Principle of InterpretationPrinciple of Interpretation
Principle of Interpretation
 
Els assignment presentation
Els assignment presentationEls assignment presentation
Els assignment presentation
 
Statutory Interpretation Essay
Statutory Interpretation EssayStatutory Interpretation Essay
Statutory Interpretation Essay
 
Golden rule and quick RECAP of Literal Rule
Golden rule and quick RECAP of Literal RuleGolden rule and quick RECAP of Literal Rule
Golden rule and quick RECAP of Literal Rule
 
The Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In Democracy
The Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In DemocracyThe Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In Democracy
The Importance Of Freedom Of Expression In Democracy
 
Rules of statutary interpretation PPT By Rajashree J Jawale
Rules of statutary interpretation PPT By Rajashree J JawaleRules of statutary interpretation PPT By Rajashree J Jawale
Rules of statutary interpretation PPT By Rajashree J Jawale
 
Re examining the theory of savigny, the theory of acquired
Re   examining the theory of savigny, the theory of acquiredRe   examining the theory of savigny, the theory of acquired
Re examining the theory of savigny, the theory of acquired
 
Effects Of The Rule Of Law
Effects Of The Rule Of LawEffects Of The Rule Of Law
Effects Of The Rule Of Law
 
Rules of Interpretation overview of law and presentation
Rules of Interpretation overview of law and presentationRules of Interpretation overview of law and presentation
Rules of Interpretation overview of law and presentation
 
Assignment on Interpretation of Statutes in Common Law and Civil Law System 0...
Assignment on Interpretation of Statutes in Common Law and Civil Law System 0...Assignment on Interpretation of Statutes in Common Law and Civil Law System 0...
Assignment on Interpretation of Statutes in Common Law and Civil Law System 0...
 
Has the Human Rights Act (1998) led to a more pronounced judicial interventio...
Has the Human Rights Act (1998) led to a more pronounced judicial interventio...Has the Human Rights Act (1998) led to a more pronounced judicial interventio...
Has the Human Rights Act (1998) led to a more pronounced judicial interventio...
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
The Value Of Peace Of Mind Essay
The Value Of Peace Of Mind EssayThe Value Of Peace Of Mind Essay
The Value Of Peace Of Mind Essay
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
Common Law And The Legal System
Common Law And The Legal SystemCommon Law And The Legal System
Common Law And The Legal System
 
Bodenheimer and the theories of adjudication
Bodenheimer and the theories of adjudicationBodenheimer and the theories of adjudication
Bodenheimer and the theories of adjudication
 
Unisa constitutional law assignment
Unisa constitutional law assignmentUnisa constitutional law assignment
Unisa constitutional law assignment
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

IaC & GitOps in a Nutshell - a FridayInANuthshell Episode.pdf
IaC & GitOps in a Nutshell - a FridayInANuthshell Episode.pdfIaC & GitOps in a Nutshell - a FridayInANuthshell Episode.pdf
IaC & GitOps in a Nutshell - a FridayInANuthshell Episode.pdfDaniel Santiago Silva Capera
 
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationUsing IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationIES VE
 
Designing A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLDesigning A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLRuncy Oommen
 
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptxIntroduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptxMatsuo Lab
 
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfMachine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfAijun Zhang
 
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration WorkflowsIgniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration WorkflowsSafe Software
 
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1DianaGray10
 
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-pyJamie (Taka) Wang
 
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Brian Pichman
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAshyamraj55
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UbiTrack UK
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8DianaGray10
 
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopNIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopBachir Benyammi
 
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Adtran
 
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXVoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXTarek Kalaji
 
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IES VE
 
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just MinutesAI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just MinutesMd Hossain Ali
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7DianaGray10
 
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdfUiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdfDianaGray10
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

IaC & GitOps in a Nutshell - a FridayInANuthshell Episode.pdf
IaC & GitOps in a Nutshell - a FridayInANuthshell Episode.pdfIaC & GitOps in a Nutshell - a FridayInANuthshell Episode.pdf
IaC & GitOps in a Nutshell - a FridayInANuthshell Episode.pdf
 
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve DecarbonizationUsing IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
Using IESVE for Loads, Sizing and Heat Pump Modeling to Achieve Decarbonization
 
Designing A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URLDesigning A Time bound resource download URL
Designing A Time bound resource download URL
 
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptxIntroduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
 
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfMachine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
 
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration WorkflowsIgniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
Igniting Next Level Productivity with AI-Infused Data Integration Workflows
 
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
 
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
 
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
 
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopNIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
 
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
 
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXVoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
 
20230104 - machine vision
20230104 - machine vision20230104 - machine vision
20230104 - machine vision
 
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
 
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just MinutesAI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
AI Fame Rush Review – Virtual Influencer Creation In Just Minutes
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
 
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdfUiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
 

Statutory interpretation

  • 1. Asif Tufal www.lawteacher.net 1 STATUTORY INTERPRETATION THE PROBLEM OF INTERPRETATION SOLUTIONS F.A.R. Bennion (Statute Law, 1990), has identified a number of factors that may cause doubt: 1. The draftsman may refrain from using certain words that he or she regards as necessarily implied. The problem here is that the users may not realise that this is the case. 2. The draftsman may use a broad term (“a word or phrase of wide meaning”) and leave it to the user to judge what situations fall within it. 3. Ambiguous words may be used. 4. There may be unforeseeable developments. 5. There are many ways in which the wording may be inadequate. There may be a printing error, a drafting error or another error. General methods of statutory interpretation have been developed by the judges. The Interpretation Act 1978 only provides certain standard definitions of common provisions, eg, “he” includes “she”, and thereby enables statutes to be drafted more briefly than otherwise would be the case. Modern statutes commonly include “definition sections” in which the meaning of words and phrases found in the statute are explained, eg ss2-6 of the Theft Act 1968 explain the elements of the offence in s1. Explanatory Notes have been published for new Acts since 1999. THE RULES OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION RULE CASE EXAMPLE COMMENTARY 1. Literal By the literal rule, words in a statute must be given their plain, ordinary or literal meaning. The objective of the court is to discover the intention of Parliament as expressed in the words used. This approach will be used even if it produces absurdity or hardship, in which case the remedy is for Parliament to pass an amending statute. One of the leading statements of the literal rule was made by Tindal CJ in the Sussex Peerage Case (1844) 11 Cl&Fin 85: “… the only rule for the construction of Acts of Parliament is, that they should be construed according to the intent of the Parliament which passed the Act. If the words of the statute are in themselves precise and unambiguous, then no more can be necessary than to expound those words in their natural and ordinary sense. The words themselves alone do, in such case, best declare the intention of the lawgiver.” Lord Esher in R v Judge of the City Whiteley v Chappell (1868) LR 4 QB 147. The defendant pretended to be someone who had recently died in order to use that person’s vote. It was an offence to “personate any person entitled to vote”. As dead people cannot vote, the defendant was held not to have committed an offence. London & North Eastern Railway v Berriman [1946] AC 278. The claimant’s husband was killed while oiling points along a railway line. Compensation was only payable if he had been “relaying or repairing” the line. The HL held oiling points was maintaining the line and not “relaying or repairing”. Cutter v Eagle Star Insurance [1998] 4 All ER 417. The claimant was sitting in his friend’s car in a car park and was injured when a can of lighter fuel exploded. The driver was insured, as required by the Road Traffic Act 1988, for injury caused while on a “road”. The HL held that the car park was not a road because a road provides for cars to move along it to a destination. Therefore, the 3It encourages draftsmen to be precise. 3It respects the words used by Parliament. 3It prevents judges “rewriting” statute law, which only Parliament can do. 3Alternative approaches would make it difficult to predict how doubtful provisions might be “rewritten” by judges. 7Judges have tended excessively to emphasise the literal meaning of statutory provisions without giving due weight to their meaning in wider contexts. 7It assumes that parliamentary draftsmen are perfect. 7 It ignores the limitations of language. 7It can lead to absurd or harsh decisions and Parliament has to pass an amending statute.
  • 2. Asif Tufal www.lawteacher.net 2 of London Court [1892] 1 QB 273 said: “If the words of an Act are clear then you must follow them even though they lead to a manifest absurdity. The court has nothing to do with the question whether the legislature has committed an absurdity.” insurance company was not liable to pay out on the driver’s policy because the claimant had not been injured due to the use of the car on a “road”. 2. Golden The golden rule provides that if the words used are ambiguous the court should adopt an interpretation which avoids an absurd result. In Grey v Pearson (1857) 6 HL Cas 61, Lord Wensleydale said: “… the grammatical and ordinary sense of the words is to be adhered to, unless that would lead to some absurdity, or some repugnance or inconsistency with the rest of the instrument, in which case the grammatical and ordinary sense of the words may be modified, so as to avoid that absurdity and inconsistency, but no farther.” This became known as “Lord Wensleydale’s golden rule”. In its second, broader sense, the court may modify the reading of words in order to avoid a repugnant situation as in Re Sigsworth (1935). R v Allen (1872) LR 1 CCR 367 The defendant was married and married again. It was an offence for a married person to “marry” again unless they were widowed or divorced. When caught the defendant argued that he did not commit this offence as the law regarded his second marriage as invalid. The court held that the word “marry” could also mean a person who “goes through a ceremony of marriage” and so the defendant was guilty. Re Sigsworth [1935] Ch 89. The defendant had murdered his mother. She did not have a will and he stood to inherit her estate as next of kin, by being her “issue”. The court applied the golden rule and held that “issue” would not be entitled to inherit where they had killed the deceased. Adler v George[1964] 2 QB 7. It was an offence to obstruct HM Forces “in the vicinity of ” a prohibited place. The defendants had obstructed HM Forces in a prohibited place (an army base) and argued that they were not liable. The court found them guilty as “in the vicinity of” meant near or in the place. 3It allows judges to avoid absurd or harsh results which would be produced by a literal reading. 3It allows judges to avoid repugnant situations, as in Re Sigsworth. 7There is clear way to test the existence of absurdity, inconsistency or inconvenience, or to measure their quality or extent. 7Judges can “rewrite” statute law, which only Parliament is allowed to do. 3. Mischief The mischief rule is contained in Heydon's Case (1584) 3 Co Rep 7, and allows the court to look at the state of the former law in order to discover the mischief in it which the present statute was designed to remedy. The court stated that for the true interpretation of all statutes four things are to be considered: Smith v Hughes (1960) 2 All ER 859. Six women had been charged with soliciting “in a street or public place for the purpose of prostitution”. However, one woman had been on a balcony and others behind the windows of ground floor rooms. The court held they were guilty because the mischief aimed at was people being molested or solicited by prostitutes. 4It allows judges to put into effect the remedy Parliament chose to cure a problem in the common law. 4It was developed at a time when: statutes were a minor source of law; drafting was not as precise as today and before Parliamentary supremacy was established. 7Judges can “rewrite” statute law, which only Parliament is allowed
  • 3. Asif Tufal www.lawteacher.net 3 1st. What was the common law before the making of the Act. 2nd. What was the mischief and defect for which the common law did not provide. 3rd. What remedy Parliament resolved and appointed to cure the disease. 4th. The true reason of the remedy; and then the function of the judge is to make such construction as shall supress the mischief and advance the remedy. Royal College of Nursing v DHSS [1981] 1 All ER 545. The Abortion Act 1967 allows abortions by “a registered medical practitioner”. Doctors carried out the first part of the procedure and the second was performed by nurses but without a doctor being present. The HL held (by 3-2) that this procedure was lawful because the mischief Parliament was trying to remedy was back street abortions performed by unqualified people. Corkery v Carpenter [1951] 1 KB 102. A person could be arrested if found drunk in charge of a “carriage” on the highway. The defendant had been arrested for being drunk in charge of a bicycle on the highway. The court held that a bicycle was a “carriage” for the purposes of the Act because the mischief aimed at was drunken persons on the highway in charge of some form of transport, and so the defendant was properly arrested. DPP v Bull [1994] 4 All ER 411. A man had been charged with loitering or soliciting in a street or public place for the purpose of prostitution. The court held that the term “prostitute” was limited to female prostitutes. The mischief the Street Offences Act 1959 was intended to remedy was a mischief created by women. to do. 7It must be possible to discover the mischief in order for this rule to be used. 4. Purposive The purposive approach is one that will “promote the general legislative purpose underlying the provisions” (per Lord Denning MR in Notham v London Boroughof Barnet [1978] 1 WLR 220). There will be a comparison of readings of the provision in question based on the literal or grammatical meaning of words with readings based on a purposive approach. In Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart [1993] AC 593, Lord Browne- Wilkinson referred to “the purposive approach to construction now adopted by the courts in order to give effect to the true intentions Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd [1997] 2 All ER 406. The complainant suffered racial abuse at work, which he claimed amounted to racial discrimination for which the employers were liable under s32 of the Race Relations Act 1976. The CA applied the purposive approach and held that the acts of discrimination were committed “in the course of employment”. Any other interpretation ran counter to the whole legislative scheme and underlying policy of s32. 4It gives effect to the true intentions of Parliament. 7It can only be used if a judge can find Parliament’s intention in the statute or Parliamentary material. 7 Judges can “rewrite” statute law, which only Parliament is allowed to do.
  • 4. Asif Tufal www.lawteacher.net 4 of the legislature”. 5. Integrated Sir Rupert Cross, Statutory Interpretation (3rd ed, 1995), suggested that there was a unified approach to interpretation: (i) the judge begins by using the grammatical and ordinary or technical meaning of the context of the statute; (ii) if this produces an absurd result then the judge may apply any secondary meaning possible; (iii) the judge may imply words into the statute or alter or ignore words to prevent a provision from being unintelligible, unworkable or absurd; and (iv) in applying these rules the judge may resort to various aids and presumptions. THE RULES OF LANGUAGE RULE CASE EXAMPLE 1. Ejusdem generis (of the same kind) General words following particular words will be interpreted in the light of the particular ones. Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse [1899] AC 143. It was an offence to use a “house, office, room or other place for betting”. The defendant was operating from a place outdoors. The court held that “other place” had to refer to other indoor places because the words in the list were indoor places and so he was not guilty. 2. Noscitur a sociis (known from associates) A word will be interpreted in the context of surrounding words. Muir v Keay (1875) LR 10 QB 594. All houses kept open at night for “public refreshment, resort and entertainment” had to be licensed. The defendant argued that his café did not need a licence because he did not provide entertainment. The court held that “entertainment” did not mean musical entertainment but the reception and accommodation of people, so the defendant was guilty. 3. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius (the express mention of one thing is the exclusion of another) The express mention of things in a list excludes those things not mentioned. Tempest v Kilner (1846) 3 CB 249. A statute required that contracts for the sale of “goods, wares and merchandise” of £10 or more had to be evidenced in writing. The court had to decide if this applied to a contract for the sale of stocks and shares. The court held that the statute did not apply because stocks and shares were not mentioned.
  • 5. Asif Tufal www.lawteacher.net 5 INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AIDS TO INTERPRETATION There is a wide range of material that may be considered by a judge when interpreting statutes. Some of these aids may be found within the statute in question, others are external to the statute. INTERNAL EXTERNAL 1. Other enacting words An examination of the whole of a statute, or relevant Parts, may indicate the overall purpose of the legislation. It may show that a particular interpretation of that provision will lead to absurdity when taken with another section. 2. Long Title The long title should be read as part of the context, “as the plainest of all the guides to the general objectives of a statute” (per Lord Simon in The Black-Clawson Case [1975]). 3. Preamble When there is a preamble it is will generally state the mischief to be remedied and the scope of the Act. It is therefore clearly permissible to use it as an aid to construing the enacting provisions. 4. Short Title There is some question whether the short title should be used to resolve doubt. 5. Headings, side-notes and punctuation Headings, side-notes and punctuation may be considered as part of the context. 1. Dictionaries and other literary sources Dictionaries are commonly consulted as a guide to the meaning of statutory words. Textbooks may also be consulted. 2. Practice The practice followed in the past may be a guide to interpretation. For example, the practice of eminent conveyancers where the technical meaning of a word or phrase used in conveyancing is in issue. 3. Other Statutes in Pari Materia Related statutes dealing with the same subject matter as the provision in question may be considered both as part of the context and to resolve ambiguities. A statute may provide expressly that it should be read as one with an earlier statute(s). 4. Official Reports Legislation may be preceded by a report of a Royal Commission, the Law Commissions or some other official advisory committee. These reports may be considered as evidence of the pre-existing state of the law and the “mischief” with which the legislation was intended to deal. However, it has been held that the recommendations contained in them may not be regarded as evidence of Parliamentary intention as Parliament may not have accepted the recommendations and acted upon them (The Black- Clawson Case [1975] AC 591). 5. Treaties and International Conventions There is a presumption that Parliament does not legislate in such a way that the UK would be in breach of its international obligations. 6. Parliamentary Materials/Hansard In Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v Hart [1993] AC 593, the House of Lords relaxed the general prohibition (in Davis v Johnson [1979] AC 264) that a court may not refer to Parliamentary materials, such as reports of debates in the House and in committee (Hansard) and the explanatory memoranda attached to Bills, when interpreting statutes. They may now be used where: (a) legislation is ambiguous or obscure, or leads to an absurdity; (b) the material relied on consists of one or more statements by a minister or other promoter of the Bill together if necessary with such other parliamentary material asis necessary to understand such statements and their effect; and (c) the statements relied on are clear.
  • 6. Asif Tufal www.lawteacher.net 6 PRESUMPTIONS PRESUMPTION CASE EXAMPLE 1. Presumption against changes in the common law 2. Presumption against ousting the jurisdiction of the courts 3. Presumption against interference with vested rights 4. Strict construction of penal laws in favour of the citizen 5. Presumption against retrospective operation 6. Presumption that statutes do no affect the Crown 7. Others