2. SYSTEMIC AND PIECEMEAL APPROACHES COMPARED SYSTEMIC FEATURE PIECEMEAL System / network wide FOCUS Projects and experiments Coordinated GOVERNANCE Ad - hoc Retrofit and newbuild SCALE New Build Long-term commitment TIME One-off-episodic Multi-actors ACTORS Inside Project System change KEY INDICATORS Project completion (source - SURF / ARUP) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Adapting the Landscape
3.
4.
5. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ … the brief “ assess the potential for creating “test the validity of marrying A major regional environmental, economic potential to the natural recreational and visitor resource environment and green to complement and add vitality to infrastructure based land economic development within the regeneration initiatives”. Mersey Valley”. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Adapting the Landscape
9. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ … challenges …objectives …principles Globalisation Increase resilience Landscape driven Climate change Adaption / mitigation High ambition Energy / food security Sustainable growth People focus Nature of work Quality of life Generational change Regeneration ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Adapting the Landscape