Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Â
PATH INTERCON 2011 presentation
1. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș A Proximity-Aware Transparent Handoff MobilityScheme for VoIP Communication overInfrastructure Mesh Networks Juan Carlos Basurto, Patricia ChĂĄvez, HernĂĄn CĂłrdova ESPOL - Ecuador
2. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș Key Concepts 1. Wireless Mesh Network 2. QoS & VoIP 3. Mobility & Handoff 31/07/2011 2
3. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș Motivation Mobilityisessential in VoWLANimplementations. WirelessMesh Networks offerscalability, versatility and ease of implementation and access. GoodQoSlevels + FastHandoffsshould be amust. 31/07/2011 3
4. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș RetaledWork SMesh DSN Labs @ Johns Hopkins University, USA LCMIM NICTA, University of Queensland, AU 31/07/2011 4
5. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș RelatedWork - SMesh Tricksclientsintobelievingthereâsoneonmipresentnode. Handoff: gARPinjectionbasedonclientâs RSSI. Custom DHCP server totrackclientmovement. Client and Routergroupsconcepts (Spines). Customaddressingscheme. Customroutingprotocol: RedundantMultipathbased. 31/07/2011 5
6. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș RelatedWork - SMesh Pros Robust FastHandoffsachieved Unmodifiedclientswitheasysetup Cons DHCP leasing couldtakeseveralseconds Excessivefloodduringhandoffs(overhead) CannotimplementotherRoutingProtocols 31/07/2011 6
7. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș RelatedWork - LCMIM PeriodicgARPbroadcasting Handoff and Mobility: Round RobinbasedgARPbroadcasting Allnodeshavetwo interfaces: Forbackhaul (different) and Forclient (unique) communication Clientsâ IPsconfiguredstatically Allclientshavethesame Default GW Clientliststomanage active clients and PINGsto inactive Modification of ADOV routingprotocol Oranyother reactive routingprotocol 31/07/2011 7
8. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș RelatedWork - LCMIM Pros Highlyindependentnodes = lessoverhead FastHandoffsachieved Easytodeploy Cons ExcessivemediumfloodcausedbygARPbroadcasts Possibleclientoscillation Tiedto reactive routingprotocolsmodifications 31/07/2011 8
9. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș Proximity-AwareTransparentHandoff (PATH) Challenges: Fasthandoffs High grade of node Independence Easytoinstall and deploy Notboundtoanyroutingprotocol UnmodifiedClients 31/07/2011 9
10. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH - Overview Handoff and Mobility gARPinjectionbasedonClientâs RSSI Static IP addressing Allnodeshavetwo Interfaces: backhaul(different) and client (unique) Allclientshavethesame Default GW Clientlisttomanageconnectedclients and PING inactive Neighborliststomanagemobility No specificroutingprotocolneeded Highlydependenton WMN coverageimplementation 31/07/2011 10
11. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH â ClientMonitoring One interface is set in monitor mode Packet capture with RSSI analysis If RSSI exceeds a certainthresholdvalue: A gARPissenttothe new client TheclientisaddedtoClientâsList 31/07/2011 11
13. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH â InactivityCheck Keeptrack of thelast time a Clientcommunicatedwiththerouter IftheClientexceeds a fixedInactivityPeriod in value, a PING isbroadcastedtotheclient. Twopossibilities: Clientrespondstotherouterï UpdateClientâsList Clientrespondsto a new routerï New routerwillsendgARP Ifnothingisheardafter a certainadditionalperiod of time, theclientwill be removed fromtherouterâsClientâsList 31/07/2011 13
14. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH â Sinergy ClientâsMonitoring Add new clientstoClientâsList InactivityCheck PING idle clients Removeclients in ClientâsList 31/07/2011 14
15. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH â Implementation WRT54G + OpenWRT 802.11 channel 11 -65 dBm of nodeoverlapping Variables set: Threshold set to -65 dBm Inactivitycheck set to 5 and 7 seconds Routing: OLSR protocol Testsran @ ESPOL Campus 6 othernetworkstransmitting at thesame time Averagenoisefloor of -90 dBm 31/07/2011 15
16. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH â Testbed 31/07/2011 16
17. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH â Tests VoIPCalls Asterisk PBX 2 Softphones 1 Laptop 1 PC PacketLoss UDP packetinjection, capture and analysis UDP Throughput iPerf 10 Mbps UDP maxtransmission 31/07/2011 17
18. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH Results â Delay 31/07/2011 18
19. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH Results - Jitter 31/07/2011 19
20. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH Results â DelayStationaryClient 31/07/2011 20
21. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH Results â DelayMovingClient 31/07/2011 21
22. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH Results â Handoff Forward Direction Handoff from MeshRouter1 to MeshRouter2 Handoff from MeshRouter2 to MeshRouter3 31/07/2011 22
23. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH Results â HandoffReversedDirection Handoff from MeshRouter1 to MeshRouter2 Handoff from MeshRouter2 to MeshRouter3 31/07/2011 23
24. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH Results - Throughput 31/07/2011 24
25. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș PATH Results â PacketLoss 7,171 packetssent 4 Lost Nonelostduring a handoff Packetloss = 0,05% 31/07/2011 25
26. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș Conclusions PATH achievedveryfasthandoffs High grade of nodeindependence MinimumOverhead Causedby a smallnumber of PINGs and gARPs Most of theoverheadis set bytheroutingprotocol and notbythescheme UnmodifiedClients Notboundto a specificroutingprotocol. Anyroutingprotocolmay be implemented Easytoinstall No additional DHCP leasedelays 31/07/2011 26
27. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș WaystoImprove and FutureWork Determine theoptimumInactivityPeriod and pollingintervaltowhichoverheadisfurtherminized and clientconnectivityeffectivenessismaximized. Test PATH withotherroutingprotocols and determine whichonesuitsbest. Developoptimizedversions of PATH tocovereachroutingprotocolpossibleflaws. Test with dual band routerstodifferentiateclientwithbackhaulcommunicationoptimizingcapacity and throughput. Addsecuritytotests. 31/07/2011 27
28. Universidad Nacional de IngenierĂa | IEEE INTERCON 2011, Lima, PerĂș Thankyouforyourattention 31/07/2011 28