6. Preliminary Survey Results
974 Total Responses Private Firms
⢠562 Government ⢠160 Surveying/Engineering
⢠253 Commercial ⢠22 Consultant
⢠131 Non-Profit ⢠18 Geospatial Services
Government ⢠16 Aerial Image Acq.
⢠233 County Non-Profit
⢠204 State ⢠117 University/Education
⢠58 City
⢠28 Federal
⢠5 Tribal
Preliminary dataânot controlled for duplicate organization entries, etc.
7. Preliminary Survey Results
⢠Ortho Imagery
Ortho Imagery
â Last five years approx. $11 MillionÂ
â Anticipated next five years approx. $ 8 Million
p y pp $
â Reported Annual Benefits $5.314 Million
â Cost : Benefit = $1:2.42
⢠Oblique Imagery
â Annual Expenses $0.233 Million
p $
â Annual Benefits $0.753 Million
â Cost : Benefit = $1:2.23
8. Fundamental Questions
⢠How should an Aerial Imagery Program be
How should an Aerial Imagery Program beÂ
Structured?
⢠What is the appropriate collection schedule:
What is the appropriate collection schedule:
â Phases or entire state in a single year?
âEEvery 5 years or once every 3â5 years?
5 35 ?
⢠What is the best method to fund aÂ
sustainable aerial imagery program?
9. How should an Aerial Imagery
Program b Structured?
be d
⢠Several Potential Options
Several Potential Options
â State Agency Leadership
â State Agency Support
State Agency Support
â Nonâprofit Organization
â P bli P i t P t
PublicâPrivate Partnership
hi
â Voluntary Consortium
âO h ?
Other?
10. State Agency Leadership
⢠State agency management and execution
g y g
⢠Full time staff devoted to communication,Â
collaboration, management
⢠Procurement done by State
⢠QA/QC by State
⢠B
Base products fully funded by state, local optionÂ
d t f ll f d d b t t l l ti
for âbuyâupsâ
⢠Multiâparty involvement in standard setting etc
Multi party involvement in standard setting, etc.
⢠Base data available at no cost via web services
⢠Example:  Virginia, North Carolina
p g ,
11. State Agency Support
⢠Staff technical support for county/municipalÂ
pp y/ p
governments for RFPs, technical specifications, groundÂ
control
⢠QA/QC
QA/QC support t
⢠Minimum standards for aerial imagery
⢠Cost share from state
Cost share from state
⢠Local control of vendor relationship, timing, execution
⢠State funded data available for use by state agencies at
State funded data available for use by state agencies atÂ
no cost
⢠Example: South Carolina
12. Non Profit
Non-Profit Organization
⢠Corporate structure as 501cX
Corporate structure as 50 cX
⢠Board of Directors representative of the userÂ
community (public, private, academic)
y p p
⢠Voluntary participation and standards
⢠Build on existing volunteer committees andÂ
g
geospatial organizations
⢠Membership (corporate, individual, institution)
⢠Contributions from members, Federal, etc.
⢠Example: Indiana
13. Public Private
Public-Private Partnership
⢠Private participation in statewide imagery
Private participation in statewide imageryÂ
programs
⢠Bing/Google/other? Cost share participation
Bing/Google/other?  Cost share participation
⢠Limited distribution of data
⢠State leadership
⢠Beyond simply vendor/customer relationship
y py / p
⢠Example: Michigan/Bing Partnership
14. Voluntary Consortium
⢠Volunteer driven and leadership
Volunteer driven and leadership
⢠Sometimes ad hoc or specific project driven
⢠Based on common RFP but individual contracting
Based on common RFP but individual contractingÂ
between members
⢠QA/QC by individual participants
/ y p p
⢠Data distribution variable
⢠Management of funds and contracts can beÂ
g
difficult
⢠Example: WROC
15. Structure Discussion
⢠Are there other models to consider?
Are there other models to consider?
⢠What do you see as strengths and weaknessesÂ
of each possible structure?
of each possible structure?
⢠Which is the most appropriate for Wisconsin?
⢠Which is politically the most likely to beÂ
successful?
16. Collection Schedule
⢠How critical is the 5âyear cycle?
How critical is the  5 year cycle?
⢠Can we transition to a multiâyear program?
â 1/3 f t t
1/3 of state annually?
ll ?
17. How do we pay for this?
⢠Stable
⢠Predictable
⢠Annual l
18. Next Steps for the Project
⢠Continue interviews
Continue interviews
⢠Collect âsuccess storiesâ
⢠Analyze survey and interview responses inÂ
l di i i
more detail
⢠Draft of Business Plan in January
19. Visit with us!
⢠We will be in the Mahler Board Room for the
We will be in the Mahler Board  Room for theÂ
entire conference
⢠We want to hear from youâŚ.
We want to hear from youâŚ.Â
⢠Martin Roche, GISP
â mroche@GeoPlanning Services.com
â (407)Â 608â9548
⢠Jim Lacy, GISP
â Lacy@wisc.edu
â (608)Â 262â6850