3. 5th Amendment
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or
otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or
indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in
the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in
actual service in time of War or public danger; nor
shall any person be subject for the same offense to be
twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be
compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against
himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law; nor shall
private property be taken for public use, without just
compensation
4. Procedural Law
Body of laws
Governing each stage
Criminal Justice process
Violation-person goes free
Legislative/judicial oversight
5. Rules of Evidence
Police gather evidence
Prosecutor presents evidence
Defense argues against
Judge rules
9. Fruit of the
Poisoned Tree Doctrine
Exclusionary rule extended:
-from evidence directly obtained illegally
-to evidence indirectly obtained illegally
10. Fruit of the Poisoned Tree Doctrine
Takes police to hidden gun/money
Suspect confesses to whole event
Detectives confront suspect w/bag &
mask
CSA sees car opens trunk-mask/bag
Search warrant for residence
Bank robbery-fingerprints lifted/ID’d
11. Fruit of the Poisoned Tree Doctrine
Probable cause hearing:
-defense -search warrant listed residence
-judge rules car search illegal
-any/all evidence obtained inadmissible
-objects in car/confession/suspect leading to hidden items
-left? fingerprints at bank---suspect has banked many
times /past three years
12. Mapp v. Ohio 1961
No punishment for illegal evidence
Police:
-forced confessions
-ignore constitutional rights of accused
Supreme Court applied Exclusionary Rule to state courts
13. Search & Seizure
4th Amendment:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches
and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall
issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
14. Probable Cause
A set of facts and circumstances that would lead a
reasonable person to believe a crime has been
committed and that the person accused had
committed the crime.
15. Search & Seizure
4th Amendment:
-right to privacy not clearly defined
-Supreme Court interpretations
-”reasonable expectation “of privacy
16. Search & Seizure
Exceptions to warrant requirement:
A. Incident to lawful arrest
-person
-immediate control
-Chimel v. CA (1969)
-vehicle (seats/console)
-AZ v. Gant 2009
17. Search & Seizure
Exceptions to warrant requirement:
B. Plain view
-police have lawful presence
-cannot move items/objects
-6 foot officer/5 foot wall sees marijuana plants
-exigent circumstances
18. Search & Seizure
Exceptions to warrant requirement:
C. Consent
-authority to give limited
-once given can be withdrawn
19. Searching Vehicles
Carroll v. US 1925:
-search of vehicle w/o warrant admissible if:
-PC to believe crime occurred
-delay in search would result in loss of evidence
22. Searching Persons
Court recognizes officer safety!!!
-pat down searches for weapons
-Terry v. Ohio (1968): Terry stop
-stop
-talk
-frisk
-”reasonable suspicion”
-PO articulate reason for stop
23. Public Safety Exceptions
Immediate action by police to protect public
-armed suspect-no weapon upon arrest
-search immediate area of suspect’s path
-ask where gun is
Search of airline/bus passengers/subway (2005):
-w/o PC
-w/o warrant
-”implied consent”
24. Border searches:
-no reasonable suspicion/PC/warrant
-no permission needed since cannot refuse
-legislated/case law
School searches:
-administrators/not police
-backpacks/purses/lockers
-on and near school property
-2009: no strip searches
25. Good Faith Exception
Police thought warrant was valid:
-invalid due to clerical error
-wrong address /dates on warrant
-evidence obtained admissible
29. Interrogations/Confessions
DO NOT WRITE DOWN
Miranda:
You have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer questions. Do
you understand?
Anything you do say may be used against you in a court of law. Do
you understand?
You have the right to consult an attorney before speaking to the police
and to have an attorney present during questioning now or in the
future. Do you understand?
If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you before
any questioning if you wish. Do you understand?
If you decide to answer questions now without an attorney present
you will still have the right to stop answering at any time until you
talk to an attorney. Do you understand?
Knowing and understanding your rights as I have explained them to
you, are you willing to answer my questions without an attorney
present?
32. Right to Attorney
Gideon v. Wainright (1963)
-indigent has right to lawyer at trial
Escobedo v. Ill (1964)
-right to lawyer during interrogations
Miranda v AZ (1966)
-suspects have to be told of rights
33. Police Deception
Deception during interrogations:
-lawful
-exception-telling suspect they have a deal
Police line ups:
-w/o consent
-attorney present
-all look alike
-actual suspects
-persons not capable of being guilty
34. Terrorism
DO NOT WRITE DOWN
Enemy Combatants:
-water boarding?
-torture?
-same rights as criminals?