SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 9
Defence Procurement

by Mogens Aarestrup Vind and Fie Anna Aaby Hansen, Eversheds Advokataktieselskab1



The new public procurement rules specific for the defence industry are expected
to pave the way for more competition in the European defence market to the
benefit of defence industry and security providers.

Many Member States find that existing EC public procurement rules2 are unfit for defence
contracts considering their sensible and complex character and contracts within the
sector are often awarded on the basis of national rules, differing within the EU in terms of
publication, procedures and award criteria.

In order to create more consistency and transparency, the European Commission has put
forward a proposal for a new directive concerning the coordination of procedures for the
award of certain public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service
contracts in the fields of defence and security (hereinafter the “Directive”) in December
2007.3 The proposal for the Directive has been adopted by the European Parliament and
is expected to be formally adopted by the Council in the very near future.

The general objective of the Directive is to establish an open and competitive European
defence market and the Directive is expected to improve cross-border competition and
lead to an increase in public procurement within the defence sector over the coming
years.

The Directive introduces a range of new provisions of particular interest to companies in
the defence and security industry which will be reviewed below. Among other things the
Directive provides for new provisions on the requirements that contracting authorities
may set in relation to the handling of sensitive information.

Other new initiatives are the contracting authorities' right to require security of supply
and the possibility to use the negotiated procedure as the standard procedure for
procurements.

The Directive is part of a European "defence package", which also includes a directive on
intra-community defence transfer.4 The purpose of the latter directive is to streamline
existing national licensing procedures and improve conditions for Small and Medium
Sized Enterprises (SMEs) that participate in armament development and production.

1
  Mogens Aarestrup Vind is partner in Eversheds Advokataktieselskab and heads up the EU and regulatory department in
Copenhagen. Mogens is specialised in all aspects of competition law and has previously advised some of the largest Danish
companies in a number of industry sectors, including companies in the defence sector in relation to regulatory requirements,
industrial co-operation agreements, export control rules and public procurement. Fie Anna Aaby Hansen is a trainee lawyer in
the EU and regulatory department. Fie was previously employed by the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, where she
advised companies in the Danish food sector about European aid schemes and state aid.
2
  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for
the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts and Directive 2004/17/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the
water, energy, transport and postal services sectors.
3
  The proposal for the Directive (COM/2007/0766 final - COD 2007/0280) was amended and adopted by the European
Parliament on 14 January 2009. The amendments have been agreed with the Council and the proposal now only awaits formal
adoption and publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The text with amendments is available here:
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st05/st05191.en09.pdf
4
  Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 simplifying terms and conditions of
transfers of defence-related products within the Community
The current legal framework
Public contracts awarded in the area of defence and security have until now fallen within
the scope of Directive 2004/18/EC (the “Public Procurement Directive”).5

However, Member States can exempt defence and security contracts from public
procurement rules if this is necessary for the protection of their essential security
interests. The legal basis for this is Article 296 EC of the Treaty establishing the European
Community and Article 14 of the Public Procurement Directive.

Pursuant to Article 296 (1) (a) EC no Member State shall be obliged to supply information
if the Member State considers that disclosure will be contrary to the essential interests of
its security. This provision covers procurement of both military and non-military
equipment and aims at protecting information which Member States cannot disclose
without undermining their essential security interests.

The scope of Article 296 (1) (b) EC is limited to procurement of equipment designed,
developed and produced for specific military purposes. Member States can only derogate
from the public procurement rules with reference to Article 296 (1) (b) EC when;

    the derogation concerns the production of or trade in arms, munitions and war
     material,6

    the derogation is necessary for the protection of essential interests of the Member
     State‟s security, and

    the derogation does not adversely affect the conditions of competition in the common
     market regarding products which are not intended for specifically military purposes.

Pursuant to Article 14 of the Public Procurement Directive, public procurement rules do
not apply to public contracts when:

    they are declared to be secret,

    when their performance must be accompanied by special security measures in
     accordance with the laws, regulations or administrative provisions of the concerned
     Member State, or

    when the protection of the essential interests of that Member State so requires.

In practice, many Member States have systematically invoked Article 296 EC or Article 14
of the Public Procurement Directive in order to exclude military procurement and
sensitive security procurement from the scope of Community law. As a result, contracts
in this area have often been awarded on the basis of national rules and procedures,
which differ significantly in terms of publication, procedures and award criteria.7

It is generally recognised that Member States have a broad degree of discretion in
deciding how to protect their essential security interests as the concept of „essential

5
  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for
the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 114).
6
  The list is specified in Council Decision 255/58 of 15 April 1958. The list is considered sufficiently generic to include recent
and future developments all though it is important to note, that the list includes only equipment which is of purely military
nature and purpose.
7
  According to statistics, over the period between 2000 and 2004 the EU-15 States published only 13% of all contracts for
defence equipment in the Official Journal, cf. report from the European Parliament on the proposal for a directive of the
European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain public works contracts,
public supply contracts and public service contracts in the fields of defence and security (COM(2007)0766 – C6-0467/2007 –
2007/0280(COD))
interests of security‟ is not defined neither in Community Law nor in the case law of the
Court of Justice.

However, the Member States‟ decisions are subject to the judicial review of the Court of
Justice and the Court of Justice has consistently ruled that any derogation from
Community rules must be limited to exceptional and clearly defined cases.8

In Commission v. Italy9, the Italian government considered that a purchase of helicopters
intended for civilian use (police and fire services) required special security measures and
exempted the purchase from the usual requirement of an open tender procedure. In its
judgement, the Court repeated that any derogations from public procurement rules must
be interpreted strictly and found that Italy was obliged to comply with the rules
governing the award of public contracts. The Court also held that an obligation of
confidentiality could be imposed in an open tender procedure, such as the competitive
dialogue, and Italy had not demonstrated why confidentiality could not be maintained
under such procedures.

It also clearly follows from established case law that the burden of proof lies with the
Member State. Thus, in Commission v. Spain10, the Court stated that “[…] it is for the
Member State which seeks to rely on [Article 296 EC] to furnish evidence that the
exemptions in question do not go beyond the limits of such [clearly defined] cases […]”
and to demonstrate “[…] that the exemptions […] are necessary for the protection of the
essential interests of its security.”.

In 2006, the Commission issued an Interpretative communication on the application of
Article 296 EC11 as part of the initiative towards establishing a European Defence
Equipment Market. The Interpretative communication also emphasises that Member
States do not have absolute freedom in their decision to exempt the procurement of
defence related contracts from the public procurement rules. Furthermore, it follows that
the Commission is of the view that for each defence contract in question, contracting
authorities should assess whether an exemption from Community rules is justified.



The new defence procurement directive
The new Directive is largely based on the design and rationale of the Public Procurement
Directive but has at the same time been tailored to meet the special requirements in
relation to defence and sensitive security contracts.

Member States will still have the possibility to invoke Article 296 EC to exempt defence
and sensitive security contracts from public procurement rules. However as a result of
the Directive Member States should in most cases be able to apply the procedures in the
Directive without running any security risks.

The Directive itself explicitly provides in Article 13 for the possibility to exclude certain
contracts. Such contracts include among others:

     contracts which would oblige a Member State to supply information the disclosure of
      which it considers contrary to the essential interests of its security;

     contracts for the purpose of intelligence activities; and

8
    Case 222/84 Johnston and C-328/92 Commission v. Spain.
9
    Case C-157/06, Commission v. Italy, par. 25-27.
10
     Case 414/97 Commission v Spain, par. 22.
11
   Interpretative communication on the application of Article 296 of the Treaty in the field of defence procurement, COM(2006)
779.
     contracts awarded by a government to another government.

Whether a contract falls within the Directive or can be exempted according to Article 296
EC must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. However, since one of the objectives of
the Directive is to limit the use of Article 296 EC to truly exceptional cases, the
Commission has in line herewith declared, that Member States may derogate from the
Directive only in cases where it is not sufficient to safeguard Member States essential
security interests.12

The Commission has furthermore announced that it will closely follow the transposition of
the Directive into national law and launch infringement procedures against Member
States that fails to implement the Directive as well as in individual cases of
misapplication of the new rules.


     Applicable rules and procedures after implementation of the Directive




             Procurement of military                        Procurement of non-military
                   equipment                                        equipment



         Art 296 TEC:                                       Directive 2004/18/EC applies in relation
         The exemption only applies in truly                to the purchase of non-military
         exceptional cases and only if the                  equipment and services if the applicable
         contracting authority can prove on a               thresholds are exceeded.
         case-by-case basis that an
         exemption is necessary due to the
         protection of their essential security
         interests.


                                                        Article 296 TEC applies:
         Article 296 TEC does not apply:
                                                        National regulation and procedures
         Procurement of military equipment              apply to procurement of military
         and particularly sensitive security            equipment subject to the Treaty
         equipment shall follow the procedures          principles of:
         in the new Directive provided that the
         applicable thresholds are met:                     non-discrimination

             the negotiated procedure with                 equal treatment
              prior publication of a contract
              notice can be used as the                     transparency, and
              standard procedure without the
              need for justification (flexibility).         proportionality

             specific provisions on security of
              information ensures that
              sensitive or confidential
              information remains protected.

         Special clauses allow contracting
         authorities to address issues in
         relation to security of supply.




12
     Press release from the Commission 5 December 2007, MEMO/07/547.
The scope and impact of the Directive
The Directive will apply only to particular contracts in the field of security and defence.

This includes contracts concerning the procurement of military equipment, i.e. arms,
munitions and war material as mentioned in the Common Military list of the EU.13 The list
is from 1958, but should be interpreted in the light of the evolving current technical
possibilities and procurement methods.14

The Directive also covers parts, components and/or subassemblies of military and
sensitive equipment as well as works, supplies and services directly related to the
mentioned military and sensitive equipment.

In the specific field of non-military security, the Directive will apply to procurements
which are equally sensitive as defence procurements. This can be the case particularly in
areas where military and non-military forces cooperate to fulfil the same missions and/or
where the purpose of the procurement is to protect the security of the European Union
and/or its Member States on their own territory or beyond it against serious threats from
non-military and/or non-governmental actors. This may involve, for example, border
protection, police activities and crisis management missions.15

The Directive will only apply to contracts above a certain financial threshold. As the
Commission wishes to increase opportunities for Small and Medium sized Enterprises the
threshold has been fixed at the current level under the Public Procurement Directive.

The Directive is adapted to the specificities of defence allowing Member States to protect
their security interests during the procurement process without violating their obligation
to refer to Article 296 EC only in exceptional cases.

Of particular interest to companies within the defence and security sector, the Directive
introduces the possibility to use the negotiated procedure as the standard procedure and
the Directive furthermore introduces new provisions concerning contracting authorities
requirements in relation to the handling of sensitive information and security of supply
that will be discussed in more detail below.

Procurement procedures

It is recognised that contracts awarded in the field of defence and security often are
technically complex and that there is need for more flexibility in relation to such
contracts.

Accordingly, the contracting authorities may under the Directive use the negotiated
procedure with prior publication of a contract notice as the standard procedure.

Contracting authorities may also choose to use the restricted procedure and in the case
of particular complex contracts competitive dialogue.16 The open procedure, however, is
not available for contracting authorities under the Directive as this procedure was
considered to be inappropriate in the light of the confidentiality and the security of
information that are attached to contracts within this sector.


13
     Council Decision of 15 April 1958.
14
     Cf. recital 10 of the new directive.
15
     Cf. recital 11 of the new directive.
16
     Cf. Article 25 and Article 27.
Under exceptional circumstances contracting authorities are also allowed to use the
negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice.17 However, the use of
this procedure must be justified with reference to one of the grounds mentioned in the
Directive. These grounds are slightly different from the grounds mentioned in the Public
Procurement Directive and include, for example, urgency as a result of a crisis or armed
conflict and research and development.

Similar to the Public Procurement Directive, technical reasons can also justify the use of
the negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice. Interestingly, the
Directive emphasises that consideration should be given to the fact that defence and
security equipment is often technically complex and that incompatibility or
disproportionate technical difficulties in operation and maintenance could justify the use
of the negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice.18 This would
seem to suggest that the scope for this procedure may be wider under the Directive than
under the Public Procurement Directive.

The possibility to use the negotiated procedure will undoubtedly provide contracting
authorities with more flexibility and accommodate the specific security requirements
needed in the field of defence and security contracts. For companies within the defence
sector this is likely to be good news since more contracts are likely to be tendered for in
the years to come. On the other hand, there is a risk that the use of the negotiated
procedure will lead to less transparency for companies involved compared to an open or
restricted procedure under the Public Procurement Directive.

Subcontracting

Contracting authorities may require contractors to sub-contract. Pursuant to Article 21
(4) of the Directive Member States may provide that the contracting authority may ask
or may be required to ask the successful tenderer to subcontract a share of the contract
to third parties.

The contracting authority that imposes such subcontracting shall provide a range
comprising of a minimum and maximum percentage that are to be subcontracted. The
maximum percentage may not exceed 30% of the value of the contract. The range shall
be proportionate to the object and value of the contract and the nature of the industry
sector involved, including the level of competition in that market and the relevant
technical capabilities of the industrial base.

Pursuant to the Directive19, potential subcontractors should not be discriminated against
on the grounds of nationality and depending on the value of the contract, the primary
contractor may be required to tender or at least organise a transparent and non-
discriminatory competition when awarding subcontracts to third parties.

For companies within the defence sector, this initiative represents an even greater
opportunity to be involved in contracts in the defence sector as companies may
participate on both contracting- and subcontracting level.

Security of supply

Another new initiative under the Directive is that Member States can specify
requirements in relation to security of supply. Thus, contracting authorities may for
example require tenderers to submit documentation that confirms that their national


17
     Cf. Recital 49.
18
     Cf. Recital 50.
19
     Cf. Recital 39.
governments are not planning to impose bans on the transfer (through for example
export controls rules) of the defence related products and services.

Article 23 (a) of the Directive states that contracting authorities may require “certification
or documentation demonstrating to the satisfaction of the contracting authority/entity
that the tenderer will be able to honour its obligations regarding the export, transfer and
transit of goods associated with the contract, including any supporting documentation
received from the Member State(s) concerned.”.

For Danish companies it is possible to obtain a pre-approval from the Ministry of Justice
in terms of defence material or from the Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority in
terms of dual-use material, stating that the products/services in question can be
exported without restrictions. It is important to note that companies immediately before
the actual export under the current system are required to obtain final approval in order
to be able to export the products or services. Due care should therefore be taken in
relation to how this is described in the tender offer.

The recently adopted Directive on intra-community defence transfers is likely to replace
the system of individual licences with a system of individual, global and general
licences.20 This will imply that the current use of individual licences will become the
exception rather than the rule since individual licences should be used only in certain
cases.21

Security of information

When contracts involve, require and/or contain classified information contracting
authorities are required to specify in the contract the documentation measures and
requirements needed to ensure the security of such information at the requisite level. 22

To this end, contracting authorities may require a commitment from tenderers and sub-
contractors already selected to appropriately safeguard the confidentiality of all classified
information in their possession or coming to their notice throughout the duration of the
contract. Furthermore, tenderers may be required to provide proof of sub-contractors‟
capabilities to deal with sensitive information.

Tenderers may also be required to provide a licence for the production of spare parts,
components, specific fittings and specific tests for equipment. Tenderers will need to be
aware of this potential requirement when bidding for defence contracts under the
Directive, as they may be required to disclose designs, know-how and instructions.

Framework agreements

According to Article 29 (2) of the Directive the use of framework agreements running for
up to seven years is permitted as opposed to four years under the Public Procurement
Directive. This is useful for example in the case of defence material which remains in
service for many years.

Remedies

The remedies, available to unsuccessful tenderers are the same as in the Public
Procurement Directive and include interim orders and damages. The possibility for


20
     Please see further below.
21
   Individual licenses should be used only if necessary in the protection of national security interests of a member state, or if
necessary to comply with international requirements or commitments, or in cases where it is a matter of only one individual
transfer.
22
   Cf. Article 22 of the Directive.
unsuccessful tenderers to have a concluded contract set aside that should have been
advertised also applies.23

The requirement of a 10 day stand-still period also applies and this will in the same way
as under the Public Procurement Directive allow unsuccessful tenderers to challenge the
contracting authority‟s decision.24



Offset agreements
The Directive does not specifically address the situation where contracting authorities
attach certain conditions to a contract in order to offset the fact that the contract is
awarded to a foreign contractor. The reason why the Commission has not addressed the
issue is probably due to its legal controversy. Member States‟ use of offsets will therefore
continue even though their legality in relation to the general EC treaty rules is considered
questionable.

Indirect non-military offset agreements are generally not covered by Article 296 EC, as
the provision only covers dual-use equipment if the application of EC procurement rules
oblige the Member State to disclose information prejudicial to its essential security
interests. This means that offset agreements in general cannot be exempted from
complying with EC procurement rules even if they are related to a defence procurement
contract that is exempted on the basis of Article 296 EC.

Moreover, the Commission recalls in its Interpretative communication that Member
States must make sure that offset agreements do not adversely affect competition on
markets for non-military products.



Directive on intra-EU transfers of defence products
The Directive is part of the defence package which also includes a Directive on intra-EU
transfers of defence products and a communication with recommendations for fostering
the competitiveness of the sector.

Today, many Member States require national licenses for each crossing of an internal
or external border. In order to re-establish the legitimate flow of defence products and
give access to suppliers and subcontractors in other Member States, the Commission has
adopted a directive simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related
products within the Community replacing the national licence systems with a system of
individual, global and general licences in order to facilitate transfers and transits within
the EU. As above mentioned, this will imply that the current use of individual licences will
become the exception rather than the rule since individual licences should be used only
in certain cases.

Global licences are licences for which a company can apply for the purpose of one or
more transfers of one or more products to one or more destinations.25 General licences
are issued by the government and are valid for every company within the territory of the
authorised government.

23
   Cf. Article 56. The Directive leaves some scope for the implementation of the remedies mentioned in Article 56 and it
remains to be seen how the position will be under the Danish law.
24
   Cf. Article 57.
25
   A global licence is valid for at least three years and for an unlimited number of transfers of particular production categories
to particular buyers or a particular category of buyers during the licence period.
The Directive on intra-community defence transfers leaves much discretion to the
Member States concerning the implementation of the licensing system and it remains to
be seen how effective the new system will become in practice.



Summary
In general, the Directive has the potential to bring arms, munitions and war material as
well as sensitive security equipment into the single market. Coordinating national
procedures, the Directive will contribute to reduce the current diverse procurement rules
in the defence sector.

It will make it easier for contracting authorities to use EC rules in relation to procurement
of defence and security goods as the Directive provides more flexibility in relation to both
the choice of procedures and the safeguarding of security of supply and security of
information. On the other hand, the introduction of the new Directive will most likely also
make it more difficult for contracting authorities to justify possible exemptions from the
rules in the future.

For companies in the defence and security industry the new Directive means that there
will most likely be an increase in invitations to tender in the fields of defence and
security. It will also mean that companies will be required to cope with new demands and
requirements concerning for example their capability to handle sensitive information and
guarantee security of supply.


For further information please contact:




Mogens Aarestrup Vind                          Fie Anna Aaby Hansen
T: +45 33 75 05 03                             T: +45 33 75 05 24
E: mogensvind@eversheds.com                    E: fiehansen@eversheds.com

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

INDUSTRY ANALYSIS OF INDIAN DEFENCE SECTOR - Final
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS OF INDIAN DEFENCE SECTOR - FinalINDUSTRY ANALYSIS OF INDIAN DEFENCE SECTOR - Final
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS OF INDIAN DEFENCE SECTOR - FinalJay Prajapati
 
DPP and its Impact on Indian Aerospace & Defence Industry
DPP and its Impact on Indian Aerospace & Defence IndustryDPP and its Impact on Indian Aerospace & Defence Industry
DPP and its Impact on Indian Aerospace & Defence IndustryAshish Michael
 
Advantage of 100% FDI in Indian Defence Production
Advantage of 100% FDI in Indian Defence ProductionAdvantage of 100% FDI in Indian Defence Production
Advantage of 100% FDI in Indian Defence ProductionAshish Michael
 
Advertisement Campaign for Indian Air Force
Advertisement Campaign for Indian Air Force Advertisement Campaign for Indian Air Force
Advertisement Campaign for Indian Air Force Rashika Sood
 
MAKE IN INDIA IN DEFENCE SECTOR
MAKE IN INDIA IN DEFENCE SECTORMAKE IN INDIA IN DEFENCE SECTOR
MAKE IN INDIA IN DEFENCE SECTORPramod A V
 
Defence industry in india
Defence industry in indiaDefence industry in india
Defence industry in indiaSarvesh Mishra
 
India Defence Market Potential & Challanges
India Defence Market Potential & ChallangesIndia Defence Market Potential & Challanges
India Defence Market Potential & ChallangesAklanta Kalita
 
defence deals and current status of india
defence deals and current status of indiadefence deals and current status of india
defence deals and current status of indiaSatheesh Kumar
 
Defence expenditure in India:An Overview
Defence expenditure in India:An OverviewDefence expenditure in India:An Overview
Defence expenditure in India:An OverviewPraveen Ranjan
 
Defence Acquisition Procedures Offset Guidelines and Opportunities in Defe...
Defence Acquisition Procedures Offset Guidelines and Opportunities in  Defe...Defence Acquisition Procedures Offset Guidelines and Opportunities in  Defe...
Defence Acquisition Procedures Offset Guidelines and Opportunities in Defe...IPPAI
 
Aerospace Defence Sector
Aerospace Defence SectorAerospace Defence Sector
Aerospace Defence SectorVibrant Gujarat
 
Billion Dollar Opportunities in the Indian Defence Sector
Billion Dollar Opportunities in the Indian Defence SectorBillion Dollar Opportunities in the Indian Defence Sector
Billion Dollar Opportunities in the Indian Defence SectorDr. Amit Kapoor
 
INDIAN AIR FORCE
INDIAN AIR FORCEINDIAN AIR FORCE
INDIAN AIR FORCEsairam9999
 
Eye on Defence January 2017
Eye on Defence January 2017Eye on Defence January 2017
Eye on Defence January 2017Ankur Gupta
 

Andere mochten auch (16)

INDUSTRY ANALYSIS OF INDIAN DEFENCE SECTOR - Final
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS OF INDIAN DEFENCE SECTOR - FinalINDUSTRY ANALYSIS OF INDIAN DEFENCE SECTOR - Final
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS OF INDIAN DEFENCE SECTOR - Final
 
DPP and its Impact on Indian Aerospace & Defence Industry
DPP and its Impact on Indian Aerospace & Defence IndustryDPP and its Impact on Indian Aerospace & Defence Industry
DPP and its Impact on Indian Aerospace & Defence Industry
 
Advantage of 100% FDI in Indian Defence Production
Advantage of 100% FDI in Indian Defence ProductionAdvantage of 100% FDI in Indian Defence Production
Advantage of 100% FDI in Indian Defence Production
 
Defense procurement
Defense procurementDefense procurement
Defense procurement
 
Advertisement Campaign for Indian Air Force
Advertisement Campaign for Indian Air Force Advertisement Campaign for Indian Air Force
Advertisement Campaign for Indian Air Force
 
MAKE IN INDIA IN DEFENCE SECTOR
MAKE IN INDIA IN DEFENCE SECTORMAKE IN INDIA IN DEFENCE SECTOR
MAKE IN INDIA IN DEFENCE SECTOR
 
Defence industry in india
Defence industry in indiaDefence industry in india
Defence industry in india
 
India Defence Market Potential & Challanges
India Defence Market Potential & ChallangesIndia Defence Market Potential & Challanges
India Defence Market Potential & Challanges
 
defence deals and current status of india
defence deals and current status of indiadefence deals and current status of india
defence deals and current status of india
 
Defence expenditure in India:An Overview
Defence expenditure in India:An OverviewDefence expenditure in India:An Overview
Defence expenditure in India:An Overview
 
Defence Acquisition Procedures Offset Guidelines and Opportunities in Defe...
Defence Acquisition Procedures Offset Guidelines and Opportunities in  Defe...Defence Acquisition Procedures Offset Guidelines and Opportunities in  Defe...
Defence Acquisition Procedures Offset Guidelines and Opportunities in Defe...
 
Indian air force
Indian air forceIndian air force
Indian air force
 
Aerospace Defence Sector
Aerospace Defence SectorAerospace Defence Sector
Aerospace Defence Sector
 
Billion Dollar Opportunities in the Indian Defence Sector
Billion Dollar Opportunities in the Indian Defence SectorBillion Dollar Opportunities in the Indian Defence Sector
Billion Dollar Opportunities in the Indian Defence Sector
 
INDIAN AIR FORCE
INDIAN AIR FORCEINDIAN AIR FORCE
INDIAN AIR FORCE
 
Eye on Defence January 2017
Eye on Defence January 2017Eye on Defence January 2017
Eye on Defence January 2017
 

Ähnlich wie Defence Procurement

Defenceprocurement.Newsletter.March 2010
Defenceprocurement.Newsletter.March 2010Defenceprocurement.Newsletter.March 2010
Defenceprocurement.Newsletter.March 2010vindma
 
Zanders Academy, EMIR draft regulatory technical standards on contracts havin...
Zanders Academy, EMIR draft regulatory technical standards on contracts havin...Zanders Academy, EMIR draft regulatory technical standards on contracts havin...
Zanders Academy, EMIR draft regulatory technical standards on contracts havin...Zanders Treasury, Risk and Finance
 
Insight Brussels June 2013
Insight Brussels June 2013Insight Brussels June 2013
Insight Brussels June 2013MSL
 
Insight Brussels September 2013
Insight Brussels September 2013Insight Brussels September 2013
Insight Brussels September 2013MSL
 
E. rumak, p. sitarek, polish leniency programme
E. rumak, p. sitarek, polish leniency programmeE. rumak, p. sitarek, polish leniency programme
E. rumak, p. sitarek, polish leniency programmeMichal
 
Directives for the negotiation on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Part...
Directives for the negotiation on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Part...Directives for the negotiation on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Part...
Directives for the negotiation on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Part...Thierry Debels
 
EU Competence and Intellectual Property Rights. Internally Shared, Externally...
EU Competence and Intellectual Property Rights. Internally Shared, Externally...EU Competence and Intellectual Property Rights. Internally Shared, Externally...
EU Competence and Intellectual Property Rights. Internally Shared, Externally...Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne
 
Uk data retention review ver 3.0
Uk data retention review ver 3.0Uk data retention review ver 3.0
Uk data retention review ver 3.0Amr El-Deeb
 
Ep vote-rigt-to-info[1]
Ep vote-rigt-to-info[1]Ep vote-rigt-to-info[1]
Ep vote-rigt-to-info[1]OBFG
 
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024 passed !
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024 passed !EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024 passed !
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024 passed !QuantUniversity
 
The ne bis in idem Principle in Proceedings Related to Anti- Competitive Agre...
The ne bis in idem Principle in Proceedings Related to Anti- Competitive Agre...The ne bis in idem Principle in Proceedings Related to Anti- Competitive Agre...
The ne bis in idem Principle in Proceedings Related to Anti- Competitive Agre...Michal
 
The EU’s International Investment Policy and the Negotiations for EU Investme...
The EU’s International Investment Policy and the Negotiations for EU Investme...The EU’s International Investment Policy and the Negotiations for EU Investme...
The EU’s International Investment Policy and the Negotiations for EU Investme...MYO AUNG Myanmar
 
Key legislative and jurisprudential developments of Polish Antitrust Law in 2011
Key legislative and jurisprudential developments of Polish Antitrust Law in 2011Key legislative and jurisprudential developments of Polish Antitrust Law in 2011
Key legislative and jurisprudential developments of Polish Antitrust Law in 2011Michal
 
A. jurkowska, antitrust private enforcement in poland
A. jurkowska, antitrust private enforcement in polandA. jurkowska, antitrust private enforcement in poland
A. jurkowska, antitrust private enforcement in polandMichal
 

Ähnlich wie Defence Procurement (20)

Defenceprocurement.Newsletter.March 2010
Defenceprocurement.Newsletter.March 2010Defenceprocurement.Newsletter.March 2010
Defenceprocurement.Newsletter.March 2010
 
Zanders Academy, EMIR draft regulatory technical standards on contracts havin...
Zanders Academy, EMIR draft regulatory technical standards on contracts havin...Zanders Academy, EMIR draft regulatory technical standards on contracts havin...
Zanders Academy, EMIR draft regulatory technical standards on contracts havin...
 
Insight Brussels June 2013
Insight Brussels June 2013Insight Brussels June 2013
Insight Brussels June 2013
 
Brexit & public procurement
Brexit & public procurementBrexit & public procurement
Brexit & public procurement
 
Insight Brussels September 2013
Insight Brussels September 2013Insight Brussels September 2013
Insight Brussels September 2013
 
E. rumak, p. sitarek, polish leniency programme
E. rumak, p. sitarek, polish leniency programmeE. rumak, p. sitarek, polish leniency programme
E. rumak, p. sitarek, polish leniency programme
 
Directives for the negotiation on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Part...
Directives for the negotiation on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Part...Directives for the negotiation on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Part...
Directives for the negotiation on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Part...
 
EU Competence and Intellectual Property Rights. Internally Shared, Externally...
EU Competence and Intellectual Property Rights. Internally Shared, Externally...EU Competence and Intellectual Property Rights. Internally Shared, Externally...
EU Competence and Intellectual Property Rights. Internally Shared, Externally...
 
EMIR: Regulatory technical standards
EMIR: Regulatory technical standards EMIR: Regulatory technical standards
EMIR: Regulatory technical standards
 
EU and UK private competition litigation
EU and UK private competition litigationEU and UK private competition litigation
EU and UK private competition litigation
 
Uk data retention review ver 3.0
Uk data retention review ver 3.0Uk data retention review ver 3.0
Uk data retention review ver 3.0
 
Ep vote-rigt-to-info[1]
Ep vote-rigt-to-info[1]Ep vote-rigt-to-info[1]
Ep vote-rigt-to-info[1]
 
STRATEGY DEF IND OK
STRATEGY DEF IND OKSTRATEGY DEF IND OK
STRATEGY DEF IND OK
 
Restraints of Trade and Dominance in Cyprus
Restraints of Trade and Dominance in CyprusRestraints of Trade and Dominance in Cyprus
Restraints of Trade and Dominance in Cyprus
 
Turkey Presentation, Erkan Ozdemir, PPA, Public procurement legislative exper...
Turkey Presentation, Erkan Ozdemir, PPA, Public procurement legislative exper...Turkey Presentation, Erkan Ozdemir, PPA, Public procurement legislative exper...
Turkey Presentation, Erkan Ozdemir, PPA, Public procurement legislative exper...
 
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024 passed !
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024 passed !EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024 passed !
EU Artificial Intelligence Act 2024 passed !
 
The ne bis in idem Principle in Proceedings Related to Anti- Competitive Agre...
The ne bis in idem Principle in Proceedings Related to Anti- Competitive Agre...The ne bis in idem Principle in Proceedings Related to Anti- Competitive Agre...
The ne bis in idem Principle in Proceedings Related to Anti- Competitive Agre...
 
The EU’s International Investment Policy and the Negotiations for EU Investme...
The EU’s International Investment Policy and the Negotiations for EU Investme...The EU’s International Investment Policy and the Negotiations for EU Investme...
The EU’s International Investment Policy and the Negotiations for EU Investme...
 
Key legislative and jurisprudential developments of Polish Antitrust Law in 2011
Key legislative and jurisprudential developments of Polish Antitrust Law in 2011Key legislative and jurisprudential developments of Polish Antitrust Law in 2011
Key legislative and jurisprudential developments of Polish Antitrust Law in 2011
 
A. jurkowska, antitrust private enforcement in poland
A. jurkowska, antitrust private enforcement in polandA. jurkowska, antitrust private enforcement in poland
A. jurkowska, antitrust private enforcement in poland
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)tazeenaila12
 
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZMihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZKanakChauhan5
 
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..dlewis191
 
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...IMARC Group
 
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor PresentationMoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentationbaron83
 
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizations
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizationsEntrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizations
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizationsP&CO
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHelene Heckrotte
 
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024
 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024Stephan Koning
 
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003believeminhh
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...Khaled Al Awadi
 
MC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in JhangMC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in Jhangmcgroupjeya
 
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsFabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsWristbands Ireland
 
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdfAMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdfJohnCarloValencia4
 
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfPDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfHajeJanKamps
 
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGUNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGlokeshwarmaha
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023Steve Rader
 
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig OnlineTo Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Onlinelng ths
 
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024Winbusinessin
 
Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing ExamplesIntellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing Examplesamberjiles31
 
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerak
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerakTata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerak
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerakEditores1
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
 
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZMihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
 
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
 
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
 
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor PresentationMoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
 
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizations
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizationsEntrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizations
Entrepreneurship & organisations: influences and organizations
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
 
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024
 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024
 
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
 
MC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in JhangMC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in Jhang
 
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsFabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
 
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdfAMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
 
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfPDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
 
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGUNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
 
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig OnlineTo Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Online
 
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
Ethical stalking by Mark Williams. UpliftLive 2024
 
Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing ExamplesIntellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
 
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerak
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerakTata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerak
Tata Kelola Bisnis perushaan yang bergerak
 

Defence Procurement

  • 1. Defence Procurement by Mogens Aarestrup Vind and Fie Anna Aaby Hansen, Eversheds Advokataktieselskab1 The new public procurement rules specific for the defence industry are expected to pave the way for more competition in the European defence market to the benefit of defence industry and security providers. Many Member States find that existing EC public procurement rules2 are unfit for defence contracts considering their sensible and complex character and contracts within the sector are often awarded on the basis of national rules, differing within the EU in terms of publication, procedures and award criteria. In order to create more consistency and transparency, the European Commission has put forward a proposal for a new directive concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of certain public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts in the fields of defence and security (hereinafter the “Directive”) in December 2007.3 The proposal for the Directive has been adopted by the European Parliament and is expected to be formally adopted by the Council in the very near future. The general objective of the Directive is to establish an open and competitive European defence market and the Directive is expected to improve cross-border competition and lead to an increase in public procurement within the defence sector over the coming years. The Directive introduces a range of new provisions of particular interest to companies in the defence and security industry which will be reviewed below. Among other things the Directive provides for new provisions on the requirements that contracting authorities may set in relation to the handling of sensitive information. Other new initiatives are the contracting authorities' right to require security of supply and the possibility to use the negotiated procedure as the standard procedure for procurements. The Directive is part of a European "defence package", which also includes a directive on intra-community defence transfer.4 The purpose of the latter directive is to streamline existing national licensing procedures and improve conditions for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) that participate in armament development and production. 1 Mogens Aarestrup Vind is partner in Eversheds Advokataktieselskab and heads up the EU and regulatory department in Copenhagen. Mogens is specialised in all aspects of competition law and has previously advised some of the largest Danish companies in a number of industry sectors, including companies in the defence sector in relation to regulatory requirements, industrial co-operation agreements, export control rules and public procurement. Fie Anna Aaby Hansen is a trainee lawyer in the EU and regulatory department. Fie was previously employed by the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, where she advised companies in the Danish food sector about European aid schemes and state aid. 2 Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts and Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors. 3 The proposal for the Directive (COM/2007/0766 final - COD 2007/0280) was amended and adopted by the European Parliament on 14 January 2009. The amendments have been agreed with the Council and the proposal now only awaits formal adoption and publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. The text with amendments is available here: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st05/st05191.en09.pdf 4 Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community
  • 2. The current legal framework Public contracts awarded in the area of defence and security have until now fallen within the scope of Directive 2004/18/EC (the “Public Procurement Directive”).5 However, Member States can exempt defence and security contracts from public procurement rules if this is necessary for the protection of their essential security interests. The legal basis for this is Article 296 EC of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 14 of the Public Procurement Directive. Pursuant to Article 296 (1) (a) EC no Member State shall be obliged to supply information if the Member State considers that disclosure will be contrary to the essential interests of its security. This provision covers procurement of both military and non-military equipment and aims at protecting information which Member States cannot disclose without undermining their essential security interests. The scope of Article 296 (1) (b) EC is limited to procurement of equipment designed, developed and produced for specific military purposes. Member States can only derogate from the public procurement rules with reference to Article 296 (1) (b) EC when;  the derogation concerns the production of or trade in arms, munitions and war material,6  the derogation is necessary for the protection of essential interests of the Member State‟s security, and  the derogation does not adversely affect the conditions of competition in the common market regarding products which are not intended for specifically military purposes. Pursuant to Article 14 of the Public Procurement Directive, public procurement rules do not apply to public contracts when:  they are declared to be secret,  when their performance must be accompanied by special security measures in accordance with the laws, regulations or administrative provisions of the concerned Member State, or  when the protection of the essential interests of that Member State so requires. In practice, many Member States have systematically invoked Article 296 EC or Article 14 of the Public Procurement Directive in order to exclude military procurement and sensitive security procurement from the scope of Community law. As a result, contracts in this area have often been awarded on the basis of national rules and procedures, which differ significantly in terms of publication, procedures and award criteria.7 It is generally recognised that Member States have a broad degree of discretion in deciding how to protect their essential security interests as the concept of „essential 5 Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 114). 6 The list is specified in Council Decision 255/58 of 15 April 1958. The list is considered sufficiently generic to include recent and future developments all though it is important to note, that the list includes only equipment which is of purely military nature and purpose. 7 According to statistics, over the period between 2000 and 2004 the EU-15 States published only 13% of all contracts for defence equipment in the Official Journal, cf. report from the European Parliament on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts in the fields of defence and security (COM(2007)0766 – C6-0467/2007 – 2007/0280(COD))
  • 3. interests of security‟ is not defined neither in Community Law nor in the case law of the Court of Justice. However, the Member States‟ decisions are subject to the judicial review of the Court of Justice and the Court of Justice has consistently ruled that any derogation from Community rules must be limited to exceptional and clearly defined cases.8 In Commission v. Italy9, the Italian government considered that a purchase of helicopters intended for civilian use (police and fire services) required special security measures and exempted the purchase from the usual requirement of an open tender procedure. In its judgement, the Court repeated that any derogations from public procurement rules must be interpreted strictly and found that Italy was obliged to comply with the rules governing the award of public contracts. The Court also held that an obligation of confidentiality could be imposed in an open tender procedure, such as the competitive dialogue, and Italy had not demonstrated why confidentiality could not be maintained under such procedures. It also clearly follows from established case law that the burden of proof lies with the Member State. Thus, in Commission v. Spain10, the Court stated that “[…] it is for the Member State which seeks to rely on [Article 296 EC] to furnish evidence that the exemptions in question do not go beyond the limits of such [clearly defined] cases […]” and to demonstrate “[…] that the exemptions […] are necessary for the protection of the essential interests of its security.”. In 2006, the Commission issued an Interpretative communication on the application of Article 296 EC11 as part of the initiative towards establishing a European Defence Equipment Market. The Interpretative communication also emphasises that Member States do not have absolute freedom in their decision to exempt the procurement of defence related contracts from the public procurement rules. Furthermore, it follows that the Commission is of the view that for each defence contract in question, contracting authorities should assess whether an exemption from Community rules is justified. The new defence procurement directive The new Directive is largely based on the design and rationale of the Public Procurement Directive but has at the same time been tailored to meet the special requirements in relation to defence and sensitive security contracts. Member States will still have the possibility to invoke Article 296 EC to exempt defence and sensitive security contracts from public procurement rules. However as a result of the Directive Member States should in most cases be able to apply the procedures in the Directive without running any security risks. The Directive itself explicitly provides in Article 13 for the possibility to exclude certain contracts. Such contracts include among others:  contracts which would oblige a Member State to supply information the disclosure of which it considers contrary to the essential interests of its security;  contracts for the purpose of intelligence activities; and 8 Case 222/84 Johnston and C-328/92 Commission v. Spain. 9 Case C-157/06, Commission v. Italy, par. 25-27. 10 Case 414/97 Commission v Spain, par. 22. 11 Interpretative communication on the application of Article 296 of the Treaty in the field of defence procurement, COM(2006) 779.
  • 4. contracts awarded by a government to another government. Whether a contract falls within the Directive or can be exempted according to Article 296 EC must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. However, since one of the objectives of the Directive is to limit the use of Article 296 EC to truly exceptional cases, the Commission has in line herewith declared, that Member States may derogate from the Directive only in cases where it is not sufficient to safeguard Member States essential security interests.12 The Commission has furthermore announced that it will closely follow the transposition of the Directive into national law and launch infringement procedures against Member States that fails to implement the Directive as well as in individual cases of misapplication of the new rules. Applicable rules and procedures after implementation of the Directive Procurement of military Procurement of non-military equipment equipment Art 296 TEC: Directive 2004/18/EC applies in relation The exemption only applies in truly to the purchase of non-military exceptional cases and only if the equipment and services if the applicable contracting authority can prove on a thresholds are exceeded. case-by-case basis that an exemption is necessary due to the protection of their essential security interests. Article 296 TEC applies: Article 296 TEC does not apply: National regulation and procedures Procurement of military equipment apply to procurement of military and particularly sensitive security equipment subject to the Treaty equipment shall follow the procedures principles of: in the new Directive provided that the applicable thresholds are met:  non-discrimination  the negotiated procedure with  equal treatment prior publication of a contract notice can be used as the  transparency, and standard procedure without the need for justification (flexibility).  proportionality  specific provisions on security of information ensures that sensitive or confidential information remains protected. Special clauses allow contracting authorities to address issues in relation to security of supply. 12 Press release from the Commission 5 December 2007, MEMO/07/547.
  • 5. The scope and impact of the Directive The Directive will apply only to particular contracts in the field of security and defence. This includes contracts concerning the procurement of military equipment, i.e. arms, munitions and war material as mentioned in the Common Military list of the EU.13 The list is from 1958, but should be interpreted in the light of the evolving current technical possibilities and procurement methods.14 The Directive also covers parts, components and/or subassemblies of military and sensitive equipment as well as works, supplies and services directly related to the mentioned military and sensitive equipment. In the specific field of non-military security, the Directive will apply to procurements which are equally sensitive as defence procurements. This can be the case particularly in areas where military and non-military forces cooperate to fulfil the same missions and/or where the purpose of the procurement is to protect the security of the European Union and/or its Member States on their own territory or beyond it against serious threats from non-military and/or non-governmental actors. This may involve, for example, border protection, police activities and crisis management missions.15 The Directive will only apply to contracts above a certain financial threshold. As the Commission wishes to increase opportunities for Small and Medium sized Enterprises the threshold has been fixed at the current level under the Public Procurement Directive. The Directive is adapted to the specificities of defence allowing Member States to protect their security interests during the procurement process without violating their obligation to refer to Article 296 EC only in exceptional cases. Of particular interest to companies within the defence and security sector, the Directive introduces the possibility to use the negotiated procedure as the standard procedure and the Directive furthermore introduces new provisions concerning contracting authorities requirements in relation to the handling of sensitive information and security of supply that will be discussed in more detail below. Procurement procedures It is recognised that contracts awarded in the field of defence and security often are technically complex and that there is need for more flexibility in relation to such contracts. Accordingly, the contracting authorities may under the Directive use the negotiated procedure with prior publication of a contract notice as the standard procedure. Contracting authorities may also choose to use the restricted procedure and in the case of particular complex contracts competitive dialogue.16 The open procedure, however, is not available for contracting authorities under the Directive as this procedure was considered to be inappropriate in the light of the confidentiality and the security of information that are attached to contracts within this sector. 13 Council Decision of 15 April 1958. 14 Cf. recital 10 of the new directive. 15 Cf. recital 11 of the new directive. 16 Cf. Article 25 and Article 27.
  • 6. Under exceptional circumstances contracting authorities are also allowed to use the negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice.17 However, the use of this procedure must be justified with reference to one of the grounds mentioned in the Directive. These grounds are slightly different from the grounds mentioned in the Public Procurement Directive and include, for example, urgency as a result of a crisis or armed conflict and research and development. Similar to the Public Procurement Directive, technical reasons can also justify the use of the negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice. Interestingly, the Directive emphasises that consideration should be given to the fact that defence and security equipment is often technically complex and that incompatibility or disproportionate technical difficulties in operation and maintenance could justify the use of the negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice.18 This would seem to suggest that the scope for this procedure may be wider under the Directive than under the Public Procurement Directive. The possibility to use the negotiated procedure will undoubtedly provide contracting authorities with more flexibility and accommodate the specific security requirements needed in the field of defence and security contracts. For companies within the defence sector this is likely to be good news since more contracts are likely to be tendered for in the years to come. On the other hand, there is a risk that the use of the negotiated procedure will lead to less transparency for companies involved compared to an open or restricted procedure under the Public Procurement Directive. Subcontracting Contracting authorities may require contractors to sub-contract. Pursuant to Article 21 (4) of the Directive Member States may provide that the contracting authority may ask or may be required to ask the successful tenderer to subcontract a share of the contract to third parties. The contracting authority that imposes such subcontracting shall provide a range comprising of a minimum and maximum percentage that are to be subcontracted. The maximum percentage may not exceed 30% of the value of the contract. The range shall be proportionate to the object and value of the contract and the nature of the industry sector involved, including the level of competition in that market and the relevant technical capabilities of the industrial base. Pursuant to the Directive19, potential subcontractors should not be discriminated against on the grounds of nationality and depending on the value of the contract, the primary contractor may be required to tender or at least organise a transparent and non- discriminatory competition when awarding subcontracts to third parties. For companies within the defence sector, this initiative represents an even greater opportunity to be involved in contracts in the defence sector as companies may participate on both contracting- and subcontracting level. Security of supply Another new initiative under the Directive is that Member States can specify requirements in relation to security of supply. Thus, contracting authorities may for example require tenderers to submit documentation that confirms that their national 17 Cf. Recital 49. 18 Cf. Recital 50. 19 Cf. Recital 39.
  • 7. governments are not planning to impose bans on the transfer (through for example export controls rules) of the defence related products and services. Article 23 (a) of the Directive states that contracting authorities may require “certification or documentation demonstrating to the satisfaction of the contracting authority/entity that the tenderer will be able to honour its obligations regarding the export, transfer and transit of goods associated with the contract, including any supporting documentation received from the Member State(s) concerned.”. For Danish companies it is possible to obtain a pre-approval from the Ministry of Justice in terms of defence material or from the Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority in terms of dual-use material, stating that the products/services in question can be exported without restrictions. It is important to note that companies immediately before the actual export under the current system are required to obtain final approval in order to be able to export the products or services. Due care should therefore be taken in relation to how this is described in the tender offer. The recently adopted Directive on intra-community defence transfers is likely to replace the system of individual licences with a system of individual, global and general licences.20 This will imply that the current use of individual licences will become the exception rather than the rule since individual licences should be used only in certain cases.21 Security of information When contracts involve, require and/or contain classified information contracting authorities are required to specify in the contract the documentation measures and requirements needed to ensure the security of such information at the requisite level. 22 To this end, contracting authorities may require a commitment from tenderers and sub- contractors already selected to appropriately safeguard the confidentiality of all classified information in their possession or coming to their notice throughout the duration of the contract. Furthermore, tenderers may be required to provide proof of sub-contractors‟ capabilities to deal with sensitive information. Tenderers may also be required to provide a licence for the production of spare parts, components, specific fittings and specific tests for equipment. Tenderers will need to be aware of this potential requirement when bidding for defence contracts under the Directive, as they may be required to disclose designs, know-how and instructions. Framework agreements According to Article 29 (2) of the Directive the use of framework agreements running for up to seven years is permitted as opposed to four years under the Public Procurement Directive. This is useful for example in the case of defence material which remains in service for many years. Remedies The remedies, available to unsuccessful tenderers are the same as in the Public Procurement Directive and include interim orders and damages. The possibility for 20 Please see further below. 21 Individual licenses should be used only if necessary in the protection of national security interests of a member state, or if necessary to comply with international requirements or commitments, or in cases where it is a matter of only one individual transfer. 22 Cf. Article 22 of the Directive.
  • 8. unsuccessful tenderers to have a concluded contract set aside that should have been advertised also applies.23 The requirement of a 10 day stand-still period also applies and this will in the same way as under the Public Procurement Directive allow unsuccessful tenderers to challenge the contracting authority‟s decision.24 Offset agreements The Directive does not specifically address the situation where contracting authorities attach certain conditions to a contract in order to offset the fact that the contract is awarded to a foreign contractor. The reason why the Commission has not addressed the issue is probably due to its legal controversy. Member States‟ use of offsets will therefore continue even though their legality in relation to the general EC treaty rules is considered questionable. Indirect non-military offset agreements are generally not covered by Article 296 EC, as the provision only covers dual-use equipment if the application of EC procurement rules oblige the Member State to disclose information prejudicial to its essential security interests. This means that offset agreements in general cannot be exempted from complying with EC procurement rules even if they are related to a defence procurement contract that is exempted on the basis of Article 296 EC. Moreover, the Commission recalls in its Interpretative communication that Member States must make sure that offset agreements do not adversely affect competition on markets for non-military products. Directive on intra-EU transfers of defence products The Directive is part of the defence package which also includes a Directive on intra-EU transfers of defence products and a communication with recommendations for fostering the competitiveness of the sector. Today, many Member States require national licenses for each crossing of an internal or external border. In order to re-establish the legitimate flow of defence products and give access to suppliers and subcontractors in other Member States, the Commission has adopted a directive simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community replacing the national licence systems with a system of individual, global and general licences in order to facilitate transfers and transits within the EU. As above mentioned, this will imply that the current use of individual licences will become the exception rather than the rule since individual licences should be used only in certain cases. Global licences are licences for which a company can apply for the purpose of one or more transfers of one or more products to one or more destinations.25 General licences are issued by the government and are valid for every company within the territory of the authorised government. 23 Cf. Article 56. The Directive leaves some scope for the implementation of the remedies mentioned in Article 56 and it remains to be seen how the position will be under the Danish law. 24 Cf. Article 57. 25 A global licence is valid for at least three years and for an unlimited number of transfers of particular production categories to particular buyers or a particular category of buyers during the licence period.
  • 9. The Directive on intra-community defence transfers leaves much discretion to the Member States concerning the implementation of the licensing system and it remains to be seen how effective the new system will become in practice. Summary In general, the Directive has the potential to bring arms, munitions and war material as well as sensitive security equipment into the single market. Coordinating national procedures, the Directive will contribute to reduce the current diverse procurement rules in the defence sector. It will make it easier for contracting authorities to use EC rules in relation to procurement of defence and security goods as the Directive provides more flexibility in relation to both the choice of procedures and the safeguarding of security of supply and security of information. On the other hand, the introduction of the new Directive will most likely also make it more difficult for contracting authorities to justify possible exemptions from the rules in the future. For companies in the defence and security industry the new Directive means that there will most likely be an increase in invitations to tender in the fields of defence and security. It will also mean that companies will be required to cope with new demands and requirements concerning for example their capability to handle sensitive information and guarantee security of supply. For further information please contact: Mogens Aarestrup Vind Fie Anna Aaby Hansen T: +45 33 75 05 03 T: +45 33 75 05 24 E: mogensvind@eversheds.com E: fiehansen@eversheds.com