SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
Testimony of Maureen Meyer
                    Senior Associate for Mexico and Central America at the
                             Washington Office on Latin America
                                 on Human Rights in Mexico

                                            before the

                                  United States Congress
                            Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission

                                          May 10, 2012

My name is Maureen Meyer and I am the Senior Associate for Mexico and Central America at
the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA). I have worked on the defense and promotion
of human rights in Mexico for over 13 years, including four years in Mexico City working for the
Miguel Agustin Pro Juarez Human Rights Center. I have coordinated WOLA’s Mexico program
since 2006.

WOLA works closely with human rights organizations in Mexico to seek justice for victims of
human rights violations. We also follow the development of U.S. security assistance to Mexico
through the Merida Initiative, where we have emphasized the importance of prioritizing support
for judicial and police reform efforts in Mexico and the need to hold security officers responsible
for their actions.

In the years I have worked on human rights in Mexico I have seen a greater openness of the
Mexican government to international scrutiny and the creation of national human rights
programs. Just last year, important reforms were made to Mexico’s Constitution that represent
the most significant legal change to protect, promote and respect human rights in the country in
decades. In spite of these efforts, human rights violations continue to be widespread and the
abuses of the past - arbitrary detentions, torture, extrajudicial executions, disappearances -
persist today in an environment that is made even more complex by the proliferation of
organized criminal groups.

For example, now an investigative police officer who tortures someone so that they sign a self-
incriminating testimony may not just be a state agent, he or she may also be working for an
organized criminal organization. A municipal police officer who in the past may have robbed and
extorted Central American migrants as they travel through Mexico now may also be involved in
criminal kidnapping rings targeting this vulnerable population. The majority of the over 50,000
dead as a result the drug war and their grieving family members more than likely will never see
justice in their cases given the Mexican government’s failure to effectively investigate and
prosecute these crimes. By relying on their connections to political actors, the ease of
corruption, and the ability to resort to intimidation and violence, organized criminal groups in
Mexico have severely weakened the state’s ability to promote and respect human rights and
uphold the rule of law. The same institutional weaknesses that have allowed organized crime to
flourish in the country are also at the root of human rights violations by Mexican officials.

Given this context, I want to focus my testimony on the Mexican government’s efforts to
implement institutional reforms to its police and judicial systems as essential elements to
creating rights respecting institutions that citizens can trust. While numerous cases are
documented and denounced every year, non-existing or ineffective internal and external control
mechanisms and a weak judiciary have created a climate of permissiveness for abuse since
soldiers or police are rarely sanctioned for the human rights violations they commit.

Police reform

During the Calderón administration, certain advances have been made to reform Mexico’s
police, particularly at the federal level. Given the Mexican government’s concentration on
federal reform and the fact that the United States has provided significant assistance through
the Merida Initiative to the Mexican Federal Police, I will focus my testimony on this force.

The establishment of the Federal Police in June 2009 was the most significant change in the
restructuring of Mexico’s federal law enforcement forces. Essentially, this force integrated the
former Federal Preventative Police and the Federal Investigative Agency. When it was created,
the federal government also implemented measures to professionalize, train, and modernize the
force. These include higher recruitment standards, a revamped police academy, and an
integrated communication platform known as Plataforma Mexico, which has been the recipient
of significant U.S. support.1

The Calderón administration also adopted measures to vet Mexico’s police forces and establish
trust control centers (centros de control de confianza) that carry out annual reviews of police
performance by utilizing a five-part evaluation to determine if officers are fit for duty. The
evaluation includes a polygraph test, a drug screening examination, a psychological
examination, a socio-economic investigation, and a psychometric evaluation that measures
intelligence, aptitude, and personality traits. While these exams are an important tool to root out
corruption, as of March 31, 2012, only 29 percent of Mexican law enforcement bodies had been
evaluated.2 Information currently available from the Mexican government shows that of those
evaluated, only 50 percent passed the exams.3 No information is available to assess what
happens with the officers who do not pass their exams.

Police experts have expressed concern about the over-reliance on these evaluations,
particularly the use of polygraph exams, to vet forces. Cases have already surfaced where
officers who repeatedly passed the exams were then investigated and prosecuted for links to
organized crime.4 Furthermore, officers who “fail” the exams are unable to appeal the decision.
Constitutional changes in 2009 have established that officers who fail the exams, or who are
accused of any crime, are not able to get their jobs back, even if they are later declared
innocent of any wrongdoing. Finally, the reliance on these exams also focuses exclusively on
weeding out “bad apples” within the law enforcement bodies; it does not create internal


1
  Eric Olson, “Police Reform and Modernization in Mexico, 2009,” Mexico Institute of the Woodrow Wilson
International Center for Scholars, September 2009, Washington, DC.
2
  Secretaría Ejecutiva del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública, Evaluaciones de Control de Confianza de las
Instituciones relacionadas con la seguridad e impartición de justicia en el ámbito estatal y municipal,
http://www.secretariadoejecutivosnsp.gob.mx/work/models/SecretariadoEjecutivo/Resource/723/1/images/Eval_Fed_
Est_Marzo.pdf
3
  31 percent of those examine failed the tests and the results were pending for the remaining officers. Sistema
Nacional de Seguridad Pública. Compromiso Evaluaciones de Control de Confianza Enero 2013, data from
November 2011.
4
  In one case, Victor Gerardo Garay Cadena, the former interim head of the Federal Preventive Police had passed
three different trust control tests before being arrested for collusion with the Beltran Levya brothers. Daniel Sabet,
Police Reform in Mexico: Informal Politics and the Challenge of Institutional Change, Stanford University Press, May
2012, advanced copy.
mechanisms that would address the institutional weaknesses that have allowed corruption and
abuse to flourish.

Another control mechanism within the Federal Police is the Internal Affair’s Unit (Unidad de
Asuntos Internos). Among other tasks, the Internal Affairs Unit is charged with investigating
allegations of human rights violations by agents. An analysis of compliance with the
recommendations issued by Mexico’s National Human Rights Commission (Comisión Nacional
de Derechos Humanos, CNDH) in 2009 and 2010 regarding human rights violations committed
by the Federal Police suggests that this body has not been effective in addressing human rights
violations by this force. To date, the unit has not sanctioned any of the officers implicated in the
eight cases documented by the Commission which involve violations such as arbitrary
detention, illegal detention, incommunicado, torture, unlawful killing, and assaulting and robbing
Central America migrants in transit through Mexico.5

It is true that compared to previous Mexican federal police forces, the current Federal Police are
better trained on topics such as criminal investigative techniques, crime scene preservation and
evidence collection and they also have greater technological capacity. However, the failure to
implement strong accountability mechanisms has meant that the same human rights violations
committed by Mexico’s federal police forces in the past have persisted into the present. In fact,
complaints of abuse by Federal Police agents have increased in number just as the force itself
has grown, more than tripling in size since 2006. In 2011, the CNDH received 767 complaints of
human rights violations committed by the Federal Police, whereas there were 595 complaints in
2010 and only 141 complaints in 2009.

One recent case is exemplary of this situation. On December 12, 2011, approximately 300
students from the Normal Rural College "Raúl Isidro Burgos" organized a protest in
Chilpancingo, Guerrero to request a meeting with the governor to discuss their request for better
school conditions which had remained unanswered for over three months. Over 70 Federal
Police, as well as some 90 state-level investigative and preventative police, violently responded
to the protests, which left two students dead. None of the students was armed. According to an
in-depth report by the CNDH, 42 people were arbitrarily detained by the security forces and 24
of them were beaten with sticks and batons. Video seen by the CNDH led them to conclude that
Federal Police agents had used excessive and unnecessary force in their interactions with the
students and that it was this force that initiated the aggression against the students by throwing
the first tear gas canister at the protesters. Although all three police forces fired indiscriminately
at the students, the Federal Police was first force to fire gunshots, originally just into the air.
Apart from the grave human rights violations that occurred against the students, the
Commission concluded that all of the forces, including the Federal Police, had failed to
adequately secure the scene of the protests and that they had altered the scene, including
removing bullets and casings.6

Because of the significant assistance provided through the Merida Initiative to better train and
equip Mexico’s Federal Police, the United States has a vested interest in ensuring that this new
force is not undermined by a poor human rights record. We believe U.S. assistance to the
Federal Police and state and municipal forces should prioritize support for the development and
5
  See CNDH Recommendations 1/2010; 13/2010; 23/2010; 32/2010; 49/2010; 65/2010; 43/2009; 72/2009,
www.cndh.org.mx
6
  CNDH, Recomendación No. 1 VG/2012, sobre la investigación de violaciones graves a los derechos humanos
relacionada con los hechos ocurridos el 12 de diciembre de 2011 en Chilpancingo, Guerrero, 27 March 2012.
http://www.cndh.org.mx/node/694
strengthening of internal and external control mechanisms well beyond the provision of
polygraph equipment or support for the National Police Registry. We further encourage the
State Department to determine, in consultation with the Mexican government, ways the U.S. can
support the protocols published by the Mexican government on April 24, 2012. These protocols
regulate the use of force for the police agencies within the Ministry of Public Security (Secretaría
de Seguridad Pública) and for the armed forces, and provide guidelines on the detention and
transfer of detainees to the custody of prosecutors.
Justice reform

Police and justice reform go hand in hand, since the police are part of a larger set of criminal
justice institutions that also need to function well. The ability to investigate, prosecute and
sanction effectively those who commit crimes is an essential element to ensuring the rule of law,
yet it is estimated that fewer than 25 percent of crimes in Mexico are reported and that only 2
percent of those crimes result in a sentence. Numerous cases taken on by Mexican and
international human rights organizations have further shown that of the people who are
sentenced, many never even committed a crime. As a Mexican human rights lawyer recently
stated, the Mexican justice system has become a “factory for producing guilty people.”7

In recognition of the need to change Mexico’s criminal justice system, a series of constitutional
and legislative reforms were passed in 2008 that should make the justice system more effective,
efficient, and transparent. A main element of these reforms is the transformation of Mexico’s
legal system to an adversarial judicial model with the prosecution and defense presenting
competing evidence and arguments in open court. This is dramatically different from Mexico’s
traditional inquisitorial model where most of the evidenced is presented in written form to the
judge and the proceedings take place largely outside of the public view. In theory, these reforms
should reduce the possibility of testimony obtained through torture being admitted in legal
proceedings. Other important elements of the reforms include the right to the presumption of
innocence and opening up alternative means of conflict resolution in criminal procedures.

Given the extent of the reforms being undertaken, the Mexican government established an
eight-year transition period for the implementation of the adversarial, oral criminal justice
system. So far, the implementation has been slow. According to the federal government’s
Technical Secretary for the implementation of the justice reform (Secretaría Técnica del
Consejo de Coordinación para la Implementación del Sistema de Justicia Penal), four years into
the reform process, only three states of Mexico’s 31 (Chihuahua, the State of Mexico, and
Morelos) are fully operating under the new justice system and just seven additional states are
partially operational. Although several other states are making progress on the reform it is
uncertain whether they will be fully instituting the required changes by the 2016 deadline.

A full transition to an adversarial system is important to strengthen the rule of law and gain
citizens’ trust in the Mexican judicial system. Currently, the states that are moving forward with
the reforms are showing positive results. The preliminary results of a study commissioned by
USAID found that in five reformed states, prosecutors are twice as efficient; fewer suspects are
being held in pre-trail detention; more cases are being resolved through alternative dispute
resolution mechanisms; the timeframe to resolve a case has been reduced; and judges,
prosecutors and public defenders are actually doing their jobs, being present at all hearings.8
7
  Daniel Blancas Madrigal, “Especialistas en derecho consideran que el encarcelamiento de inocentes en nuestro país refleja deficiencias
estructurales en impartición de justicia, policías investigadores y jueces,” La Crónica de Hoy, 12 February 2012
http://www.cronica.com.mx/nota.php?id_nota=636415
8
  Preliminary results of a joint study between USAID and Mexico’s Technical Secretariat (SECTEC) on the impact of
justice sector reform.
Contrary to the progress in some states, reform at the federal level has been slow. It was not
until September 22, 2011, over three years after the reform went into force, that President
Calderón submitted a bill to the Chamber of Deputies which would replace Mexico’s current
Federal Criminal Procedure Code.9 The Mexican legislative period ended on April 30, 2012
without the code being passed and it is unlikely that any reform will be approved until after the
new president takes office in December 2012. This means that many states will continue to
operate under a different judicial system than the federal government. Notwithstanding the need
for a new federal code, the proposal presented by President Calderón contained several articles
that would have represented a setback for human rights protections, including giving the police
and any other authority, such as the armed forces, the ability to carry out warrantless detentions
and searches. The proposal also included exceptions to admitting evidence that otherwise
would be considered invalid, which some fear could allow practices such as torture to
continue.10

Apart from the challenges in reforming the system itself, old practices die hard and even in
states that have implemented the adversarial criminal justice system, such as Chihuahua,
confessions obtained through torture continue to be admitted in legal proceedings. Such is the
case of Israel Arzate Meléndez, who was detained by Mexican soldiers on February 3, 2010, in
Ciudad Juárez and taken to the military barracks where he was beaten, tortured with electric
shocks to the chest and abdomen, and asphyxiated repeatedly. Israel was not seen again until
the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Chihuahua presented him to the media on February
6, 2010 as one of those allegedly involved in the massacre of 15 young people that had
occurred on January 30, 2010.11 In Recommendation 49/2011, the CNDH confirmed that Israel
had been tortured. Although he informed the judge during his arraignment that he had been
tortured into giving a false confession, she refused to view the visible marks on his body, did not
open an investigation into the torture, and ordered that his trial proceed. Two years after his
detention, his appeal challenging his indictment has yet to be resolved.12

Increased efforts to implement the judicial reforms, as well as measures to address historic
challenges to the judicial system such as corruption and lack of transparency, are essential to
overcoming the alarming 2% conviction rate for crimes in Mexico and guaranteeing more
effective investigation and prosecution of crimes, including human rights violations. U.S. support
for the judicial reform process has been instrumental in moving reforms forward at the state and
federal level, and continued support is important to further strengthen the rule of law in Mexico.
Funding for USAID Mexico’s work on justice reform at the state level is particularly important to
ensure ongoing engagement in the states that have already benefited from assistance. It should


9
  Diana Ragis, “New Penal Code Proposed by Calderón,” Justice in Mexico Project, Trans-Border Institute,
University of San Diego, September 2011 http://justiceinmexico.org/2011/09/26/new-penal-code-proposed-by-
calderon/
10
   Joint Statement by Mexican human rights organizations, “Código Federal de procedimientos Penales; regresivo y
contrario al espíritu del Sistema Penal Acusatorio,” 27 March 2012
http://www.cmdpdh.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=498%3Acomunicado-conjunto-codigo-
federal-de-procedimientos-penales-regresivo-y-contrario-al-espiritu-del-sistema-penal-
acusatorio&catid=37%3Acomunicados&Itemid=162&lang=en
11
   This refers to the killing of 15 young people attending a party in Ciudad Juarez.
12
   “State and federal governments lie about the existence of evidence against Israel Arzate Meléndez,” Press release
from Miguel Agustín Pro Juárez Human Rights Center (Center Prodh), Women’s Network of Ciudad Juárez,
Juárez Migrant Support Center, 22 March 2012
http://centroprodh.org.mx/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=501%3Agobiernos-estatal-y-federal-
mienten-sobre-la-existencia-de-pruebas-en-contra-de-israel-arzate-melendez-&catid=209%3Afront-
rokstories&lang=en
also be mentioned that several other states have requested USAID support that cannot be
addressed until additional resources are secured.

Conclusion

Recently, the Mexican Congress passed several laws that are important for human rights and
human rights defenders, including a law creating a national database for missing and
disappeared persons, a law for the protection of human rights defenders and journalists, and a
law for victims of violence and human rights violations. The federal government’s issuing of
several protocols for Mexico’s security and judicial institutions on the adequate use of force,
chain of custody, and detention procedures is also important. At the same time, a reform to
Mexico’s Military Code of Justice that would have excluded from military jurisdiction human
rights violations committed by soldiers against civilians, recently failed to pass due to the
ongoing resistance of Mexico’s Defense Ministry. This resistance to change is illustrative of the
continued challenges in combatting impunity for human rights violations in Mexico.

Although legal reforms are important, it is essential to address the underlying factors within
Mexico’s institutions that will change practices and behaviors. The creation of laws and
guidelines or providing human rights training for security forces are only effective if the soldier or
police officer knows that abuses will be investigated and sanctioned. Transparency and
accountability, including internal and external controls to investigate corruption and abuse,
should be priorities for the Mexican government to prevent human rights violations and to hold
abusers responsible for their actions. Police and justice reform are complementary efforts, and
the U.S. should prioritize its future assistance on these areas.

Finally, the United States should use the leverage provided by the human rights requirements in
the Merida Initiative. These requirements currently condition 15% of assistance for Mexican
military and police forces until it is determined that the Mexican government is investigating and
prosecuting in the civilian justice system military and police personnel who are credibly alleged
to have violated human rights, the Mexican military and police are cooperating on these cases,
and prohibitions on the use of testimony obtained through torture are being enforced. While we
understand the magnitude of the security challenges facing Mexico, efforts to combat organized
crime and violence should not be at the expense of respect for human rights. Withholding the
conditioned funds until meaningful progress on these areas is made would send a clear
message that the United States is concerned about the gravity of the human rights violations
that have occurred in Mexico.

The current violence in Mexico is often horrific, such as the 23 bodies that were found in Nuevo
Laredo on Friday, May 4, many with signs of torture. The expansion of organize crime in the
country has left thousands of victims and grieving family members; because it has further
weakened the government's capacity to guarantee human rights, organized crime also needs to
be addressed as a human rights issue. As Mexico struggles to quell the violence and the United
States government considers future security assistance to Mexico, it is important to remember
that the same institutional reforms that are needed to address human rights violations are also
essential in order to deal effectively with organized crime and violence. We believe it is in both
countries' best interest to work to curb the systematic human rights violations being committed
by Mexican security forces as an important way to strengthen the rule of law and citizen security
in Mexico.

Thank you.

More Related Content

What's hot

History of criminology
History of  criminologyHistory of  criminology
History of criminologyPakeeza Arif
 
Ii. police psychology operational assistance 1988 (184 443)
Ii. police psychology  operational assistance 1988 (184 443)Ii. police psychology  operational assistance 1988 (184 443)
Ii. police psychology operational assistance 1988 (184 443)with Wind
 
Changing Mandatory Drug Sentencing Laws
Changing Mandatory Drug Sentencing LawsChanging Mandatory Drug Sentencing Laws
Changing Mandatory Drug Sentencing LawsMelinda Fine, Ed.D.
 
Public Affairs - Monthly Newsletter | March 2018
Public Affairs - Monthly Newsletter | March 2018Public Affairs - Monthly Newsletter | March 2018
Public Affairs - Monthly Newsletter | March 2018Burson-Marsteller Brasil
 
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpeMiguel Rosario
 
Hispanics and arizona’s new immigration law
Hispanics and arizona’s new immigration lawHispanics and arizona’s new immigration law
Hispanics and arizona’s new immigration lawmmoreno22
 
Criminology in the future cja 314
Criminology in the future cja 314Criminology in the future cja 314
Criminology in the future cja 314Mimi Harvill
 
researchpaper_Munck_amoore (1)
researchpaper_Munck_amoore (1)researchpaper_Munck_amoore (1)
researchpaper_Munck_amoore (1)Audrey Moore
 
Basics of criminology
Basics of criminologyBasics of criminology
Basics of criminologyDEEPRAVIN
 
KKykerAFGResearchPaper
KKykerAFGResearchPaperKKykerAFGResearchPaper
KKykerAFGResearchPaperKrista Kyker
 
Take a Stand
Take a StandTake a Stand
Take a StandSarah M
 
BIS 300 Research proposal
BIS 300 Research proposalBIS 300 Research proposal
BIS 300 Research proposalMelisa Le
 

What's hot (17)

2003augfp
2003augfp2003augfp
2003augfp
 
History of criminology
History of  criminologyHistory of  criminology
History of criminology
 
Ii. police psychology operational assistance 1988 (184 443)
Ii. police psychology  operational assistance 1988 (184 443)Ii. police psychology  operational assistance 1988 (184 443)
Ii. police psychology operational assistance 1988 (184 443)
 
ECON460 Capstone
ECON460 CapstoneECON460 Capstone
ECON460 Capstone
 
Changing Mandatory Drug Sentencing Laws
Changing Mandatory Drug Sentencing LawsChanging Mandatory Drug Sentencing Laws
Changing Mandatory Drug Sentencing Laws
 
Chapter4
Chapter4Chapter4
Chapter4
 
Criminology essay
Criminology  essayCriminology  essay
Criminology essay
 
Mechanisms of Anti-Corruption by the United States Government: The example of...
Mechanisms of Anti-Corruption by the United States Government: The example of...Mechanisms of Anti-Corruption by the United States Government: The example of...
Mechanisms of Anti-Corruption by the United States Government: The example of...
 
Public Affairs - Monthly Newsletter | March 2018
Public Affairs - Monthly Newsletter | March 2018Public Affairs - Monthly Newsletter | March 2018
Public Affairs - Monthly Newsletter | March 2018
 
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe
33 deputados norte-americanos criticam o golpe
 
Hispanics and arizona’s new immigration law
Hispanics and arizona’s new immigration lawHispanics and arizona’s new immigration law
Hispanics and arizona’s new immigration law
 
Criminology in the future cja 314
Criminology in the future cja 314Criminology in the future cja 314
Criminology in the future cja 314
 
researchpaper_Munck_amoore (1)
researchpaper_Munck_amoore (1)researchpaper_Munck_amoore (1)
researchpaper_Munck_amoore (1)
 
Basics of criminology
Basics of criminologyBasics of criminology
Basics of criminology
 
KKykerAFGResearchPaper
KKykerAFGResearchPaperKKykerAFGResearchPaper
KKykerAFGResearchPaper
 
Take a Stand
Take a StandTake a Stand
Take a Stand
 
BIS 300 Research proposal
BIS 300 Research proposalBIS 300 Research proposal
BIS 300 Research proposal
 

Viewers also liked

Catholic and jesuit identity in higher education christian higher education...
Catholic and jesuit identity in higher education   christian higher education...Catholic and jesuit identity in higher education   christian higher education...
Catholic and jesuit identity in higher education christian higher education...Marcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 
Toward entrepreneurial universities for the 21st century - Stanford
Toward entrepreneurial universities for the 21st century - StanfordToward entrepreneurial universities for the 21st century - Stanford
Toward entrepreneurial universities for the 21st century - StanfordMarcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 
The role of brand in the nonprofit sector - Stanford Social Innovation Review
The role of brand in the nonprofit sector - Stanford Social Innovation ReviewThe role of brand in the nonprofit sector - Stanford Social Innovation Review
The role of brand in the nonprofit sector - Stanford Social Innovation ReviewMarcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 
Increasing Civic Reach - Paul Vandeventer - Stanford SIR
Increasing Civic Reach - Paul Vandeventer - Stanford SIRIncreasing Civic Reach - Paul Vandeventer - Stanford SIR
Increasing Civic Reach - Paul Vandeventer - Stanford SIRMarcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 
Approval of Nonprofit Status by the IRS - Rob Reich - PACS
Approval of Nonprofit Status by the IRS - Rob Reich - PACSApproval of Nonprofit Status by the IRS - Rob Reich - PACS
Approval of Nonprofit Status by the IRS - Rob Reich - PACSMarcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 
The challenge of Organizational Learning - Katie Smith & Amy Saxton
The challenge of Organizational Learning - Katie Smith & Amy SaxtonThe challenge of Organizational Learning - Katie Smith & Amy Saxton
The challenge of Organizational Learning - Katie Smith & Amy SaxtonMarcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 
Recognition Struggles and Process Theories of Social Movements - Carol Mueller
Recognition Struggles and Process Theories of Social Movements - Carol MuellerRecognition Struggles and Process Theories of Social Movements - Carol Mueller
Recognition Struggles and Process Theories of Social Movements - Carol MuellerMarcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 
Caux Round Table - Principles for Responsible Business
Caux Round Table - Principles for Responsible BusinessCaux Round Table - Principles for Responsible Business
Caux Round Table - Principles for Responsible BusinessMarcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 
Informe preliminar sobre Violaciones de DDHH el 19 de junio en Oaxaca
Informe preliminar sobre Violaciones de DDHH el 19 de junio en OaxacaInforme preliminar sobre Violaciones de DDHH el 19 de junio en Oaxaca
Informe preliminar sobre Violaciones de DDHH el 19 de junio en OaxacaMarcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 

Viewers also liked (19)

Catholic and jesuit identity in higher education christian higher education...
Catholic and jesuit identity in higher education   christian higher education...Catholic and jesuit identity in higher education   christian higher education...
Catholic and jesuit identity in higher education christian higher education...
 
Nestlé Waters - Bussines for Social Responsability
Nestlé Waters - Bussines for Social ResponsabilityNestlé Waters - Bussines for Social Responsability
Nestlé Waters - Bussines for Social Responsability
 
Toward entrepreneurial universities for the 21st century - Stanford
Toward entrepreneurial universities for the 21st century - StanfordToward entrepreneurial universities for the 21st century - Stanford
Toward entrepreneurial universities for the 21st century - Stanford
 
The Old Green House by Suzie Boss
The Old Green House by Suzie BossThe Old Green House by Suzie Boss
The Old Green House by Suzie Boss
 
The role of brand in the nonprofit sector - Stanford Social Innovation Review
The role of brand in the nonprofit sector - Stanford Social Innovation ReviewThe role of brand in the nonprofit sector - Stanford Social Innovation Review
The role of brand in the nonprofit sector - Stanford Social Innovation Review
 
Reflexion SJ - Visita del Papa Francisco
Reflexion SJ - Visita del Papa FranciscoReflexion SJ - Visita del Papa Francisco
Reflexion SJ - Visita del Papa Francisco
 
Increasing Civic Reach - Paul Vandeventer - Stanford SIR
Increasing Civic Reach - Paul Vandeventer - Stanford SIRIncreasing Civic Reach - Paul Vandeventer - Stanford SIR
Increasing Civic Reach - Paul Vandeventer - Stanford SIR
 
Violencia, niñez y Crimen Organizado - CIDH
Violencia, niñez y Crimen Organizado - CIDHViolencia, niñez y Crimen Organizado - CIDH
Violencia, niñez y Crimen Organizado - CIDH
 
¿Qué es la Ética? - Adela Cortina
¿Qué es la Ética? - Adela Cortina¿Qué es la Ética? - Adela Cortina
¿Qué es la Ética? - Adela Cortina
 
Approval of Nonprofit Status by the IRS - Rob Reich - PACS
Approval of Nonprofit Status by the IRS - Rob Reich - PACSApproval of Nonprofit Status by the IRS - Rob Reich - PACS
Approval of Nonprofit Status by the IRS - Rob Reich - PACS
 
Peña y televisa - The guardian (inglés)
Peña y televisa - The guardian (inglés)Peña y televisa - The guardian (inglés)
Peña y televisa - The guardian (inglés)
 
For love or lucre - Jim Fruchterman - Stanford SIR
For love or lucre - Jim Fruchterman - Stanford SIRFor love or lucre - Jim Fruchterman - Stanford SIR
For love or lucre - Jim Fruchterman - Stanford SIR
 
Collective Impact - Kania & Kramer - Stanford SIR
Collective Impact - Kania & Kramer - Stanford SIRCollective Impact - Kania & Kramer - Stanford SIR
Collective Impact - Kania & Kramer - Stanford SIR
 
Boletin - Conferencia GIEI
Boletin - Conferencia GIEIBoletin - Conferencia GIEI
Boletin - Conferencia GIEI
 
The challenge of Organizational Learning - Katie Smith & Amy Saxton
The challenge of Organizational Learning - Katie Smith & Amy SaxtonThe challenge of Organizational Learning - Katie Smith & Amy Saxton
The challenge of Organizational Learning - Katie Smith & Amy Saxton
 
Recognition Struggles and Process Theories of Social Movements - Carol Mueller
Recognition Struggles and Process Theories of Social Movements - Carol MuellerRecognition Struggles and Process Theories of Social Movements - Carol Mueller
Recognition Struggles and Process Theories of Social Movements - Carol Mueller
 
MIA Puebla - Resultados 2015
MIA Puebla - Resultados 2015MIA Puebla - Resultados 2015
MIA Puebla - Resultados 2015
 
Caux Round Table - Principles for Responsible Business
Caux Round Table - Principles for Responsible BusinessCaux Round Table - Principles for Responsible Business
Caux Round Table - Principles for Responsible Business
 
Informe preliminar sobre Violaciones de DDHH el 19 de junio en Oaxaca
Informe preliminar sobre Violaciones de DDHH el 19 de junio en OaxacaInforme preliminar sobre Violaciones de DDHH el 19 de junio en Oaxaca
Informe preliminar sobre Violaciones de DDHH el 19 de junio en Oaxaca
 

Similar to WOLA - Maureen Meyer - DDHH en México

168 Public Administration Review • March April 2017Publi
168 Public Administration Review • March  April 2017Publi168 Public Administration Review • March  April 2017Publi
168 Public Administration Review • March April 2017PubliAnastaciaShadelb
 
168 Public Administration Review • March April 2017Publi
168 Public Administration Review • March  April 2017Publi168 Public Administration Review • March  April 2017Publi
168 Public Administration Review • March April 2017PubliKiyokoSlagleis
 
Running Head CORUPTION IN CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM CORUPTIO.docx
Running Head CORUPTION IN CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM          CORUPTIO.docxRunning Head CORUPTION IN CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM          CORUPTIO.docx
Running Head CORUPTION IN CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM CORUPTIO.docxjoellemurphey
 
Resolving The Social Problem Of Crime
Resolving The Social Problem Of CrimeResolving The Social Problem Of Crime
Resolving The Social Problem Of CrimeJill Lyons
 
Foye 2015 THESIS
Foye 2015 THESISFoye 2015 THESIS
Foye 2015 THESISJohn Foye
 
Example Of Predictive Policing
Example Of Predictive PolicingExample Of Predictive Policing
Example Of Predictive PolicingSherry Bailey
 
1#1 Key Concepts in Building Law Enforcement Legitimac.docx
1#1  Key Concepts in Building Law Enforcement Legitimac.docx1#1  Key Concepts in Building Law Enforcement Legitimac.docx
1#1 Key Concepts in Building Law Enforcement Legitimac.docxkarisariddell
 
Police Misconduct And Brutality Of Police Officers
Police Misconduct And Brutality Of Police OfficersPolice Misconduct And Brutality Of Police Officers
Police Misconduct And Brutality Of Police OfficersLeslie Lee
 
Roles Of Policing Executives Using The Mintzberg Model Of...
Roles Of Policing Executives Using The Mintzberg Model Of...Roles Of Policing Executives Using The Mintzberg Model Of...
Roles Of Policing Executives Using The Mintzberg Model Of...Julie Jensen
 
Police Brutality Argumentative Essay
Police Brutality Argumentative EssayPolice Brutality Argumentative Essay
Police Brutality Argumentative EssayBrenda Thomas
 
Chapter 1 -_criminal_justice
Chapter 1 -_criminal_justiceChapter 1 -_criminal_justice
Chapter 1 -_criminal_justiceDakota Boswell
 
Techmical skills assessment review
Techmical skills assessment reviewTechmical skills assessment review
Techmical skills assessment reviewDakota Boswell
 
Ethical Principles, Decision And Principle
Ethical Principles, Decision And PrincipleEthical Principles, Decision And Principle
Ethical Principles, Decision And PrincipleAurora Cuellar
 
Scientific Ethics And Scientific Research
Scientific Ethics And Scientific ResearchScientific Ethics And Scientific Research
Scientific Ethics And Scientific ResearchCasey Hudson
 
Team 8 Community Policing Campaign (1)
Team 8 Community Policing Campaign (1)Team 8 Community Policing Campaign (1)
Team 8 Community Policing Campaign (1)Holly McCleary
 

Similar to WOLA - Maureen Meyer - DDHH en México (20)

168 Public Administration Review • March April 2017Publi
168 Public Administration Review • March  April 2017Publi168 Public Administration Review • March  April 2017Publi
168 Public Administration Review • March April 2017Publi
 
168 Public Administration Review • March April 2017Publi
168 Public Administration Review • March  April 2017Publi168 Public Administration Review • March  April 2017Publi
168 Public Administration Review • March April 2017Publi
 
Running Head CORUPTION IN CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM CORUPTIO.docx
Running Head CORUPTION IN CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM          CORUPTIO.docxRunning Head CORUPTION IN CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM          CORUPTIO.docx
Running Head CORUPTION IN CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM CORUPTIO.docx
 
Resolving The Social Problem Of Crime
Resolving The Social Problem Of CrimeResolving The Social Problem Of Crime
Resolving The Social Problem Of Crime
 
Foye 2015 THESIS
Foye 2015 THESISFoye 2015 THESIS
Foye 2015 THESIS
 
Example Of Predictive Policing
Example Of Predictive PolicingExample Of Predictive Policing
Example Of Predictive Policing
 
1#1 Key Concepts in Building Law Enforcement Legitimac.docx
1#1  Key Concepts in Building Law Enforcement Legitimac.docx1#1  Key Concepts in Building Law Enforcement Legitimac.docx
1#1 Key Concepts in Building Law Enforcement Legitimac.docx
 
Police Corruption
Police CorruptionPolice Corruption
Police Corruption
 
Police Misconduct And Brutality Of Police Officers
Police Misconduct And Brutality Of Police OfficersPolice Misconduct And Brutality Of Police Officers
Police Misconduct And Brutality Of Police Officers
 
Roles Of Policing Executives Using The Mintzberg Model Of...
Roles Of Policing Executives Using The Mintzberg Model Of...Roles Of Policing Executives Using The Mintzberg Model Of...
Roles Of Policing Executives Using The Mintzberg Model Of...
 
Police Brutality Argumentative Essay
Police Brutality Argumentative EssayPolice Brutality Argumentative Essay
Police Brutality Argumentative Essay
 
Chapter 1 -_criminal_justice
Chapter 1 -_criminal_justiceChapter 1 -_criminal_justice
Chapter 1 -_criminal_justice
 
Techmical skills assessment review
Techmical skills assessment reviewTechmical skills assessment review
Techmical skills assessment review
 
Police Reform Memo
Police Reform MemoPolice Reform Memo
Police Reform Memo
 
J:D research paper
J:D research paperJ:D research paper
J:D research paper
 
Ethical Principles, Decision And Principle
Ethical Principles, Decision And PrincipleEthical Principles, Decision And Principle
Ethical Principles, Decision And Principle
 
Conpap Presentation.pptx
Conpap Presentation.pptxConpap Presentation.pptx
Conpap Presentation.pptx
 
Scientific Ethics And Scientific Research
Scientific Ethics And Scientific ResearchScientific Ethics And Scientific Research
Scientific Ethics And Scientific Research
 
Police Corruption Paper
Police Corruption PaperPolice Corruption Paper
Police Corruption Paper
 
Team 8 Community Policing Campaign (1)
Team 8 Community Policing Campaign (1)Team 8 Community Policing Campaign (1)
Team 8 Community Policing Campaign (1)
 

More from Marcos Eduardo Villa Corrales

IACHR conducted visit to the United States Southern Border
IACHR conducted visit to the United States Southern BorderIACHR conducted visit to the United States Southern Border
IACHR conducted visit to the United States Southern BorderMarcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 
Interculturality, an approach to English Language Learners (ELL)
Interculturality, an approach to English Language Learners (ELL)Interculturality, an approach to English Language Learners (ELL)
Interculturality, an approach to English Language Learners (ELL)Marcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 
Interculturality: How can we move from racism? - Student Tennessee Education ...
Interculturality: How can we move from racism? - Student Tennessee Education ...Interculturality: How can we move from racism? - Student Tennessee Education ...
Interculturality: How can we move from racism? - Student Tennessee Education ...Marcos Eduardo Villa Corrales
 

More from Marcos Eduardo Villa Corrales (20)

FPA April 28 meeting - Birmingham AL
FPA April 28 meeting - Birmingham ALFPA April 28 meeting - Birmingham AL
FPA April 28 meeting - Birmingham AL
 
FPA - Birmingham AL - First Meeting
FPA - Birmingham AL - First MeetingFPA - Birmingham AL - First Meeting
FPA - Birmingham AL - First Meeting
 
Freedom Prep - Info Sheet
Freedom Prep - Info SheetFreedom Prep - Info Sheet
Freedom Prep - Info Sheet
 
Freedom Prep - General Flyer Alabama
Freedom Prep - General Flyer AlabamaFreedom Prep - General Flyer Alabama
Freedom Prep - General Flyer Alabama
 
UNIDOS US - 2019 Policy Agenda
UNIDOS US - 2019 Policy AgendaUNIDOS US - 2019 Policy Agenda
UNIDOS US - 2019 Policy Agenda
 
Unheard - DACA spoken word
Unheard - DACA spoken wordUnheard - DACA spoken word
Unheard - DACA spoken word
 
Ms Webb FPA CEO/Founder Interview - SDH
Ms Webb FPA CEO/Founder Interview - SDHMs Webb FPA CEO/Founder Interview - SDH
Ms Webb FPA CEO/Founder Interview - SDH
 
Entrevista a Ms Webb - Transcripción en español
Entrevista a Ms Webb - Transcripción en españolEntrevista a Ms Webb - Transcripción en español
Entrevista a Ms Webb - Transcripción en español
 
Duke TIP Program - Freedom Preparatory Academy
Duke TIP Program - Freedom Preparatory AcademyDuke TIP Program - Freedom Preparatory Academy
Duke TIP Program - Freedom Preparatory Academy
 
St. Jude Leadership Society
St. Jude Leadership SocietySt. Jude Leadership Society
St. Jude Leadership Society
 
Peace Players Memphis Director - Job description
Peace Players Memphis Director -  Job descriptionPeace Players Memphis Director -  Job description
Peace Players Memphis Director - Job description
 
2018 MICAH Public Meeting Program
2018 MICAH Public Meeting Program2018 MICAH Public Meeting Program
2018 MICAH Public Meeting Program
 
IACHR conducted visit to the United States Southern Border
IACHR conducted visit to the United States Southern BorderIACHR conducted visit to the United States Southern Border
IACHR conducted visit to the United States Southern Border
 
MICAH Public Meeting 2019 - Breaking Through
MICAH Public Meeting 2019 - Breaking ThroughMICAH Public Meeting 2019 - Breaking Through
MICAH Public Meeting 2019 - Breaking Through
 
MICAH public meeting 2019
MICAH public meeting 2019MICAH public meeting 2019
MICAH public meeting 2019
 
MICAH - Lead Community Organizer - Job announcement
MICAH - Lead Community Organizer - Job announcementMICAH - Lead Community Organizer - Job announcement
MICAH - Lead Community Organizer - Job announcement
 
Immigration Detention INC
Immigration Detention INCImmigration Detention INC
Immigration Detention INC
 
MICAH - Issue Convention
MICAH - Issue ConventionMICAH - Issue Convention
MICAH - Issue Convention
 
Interculturality, an approach to English Language Learners (ELL)
Interculturality, an approach to English Language Learners (ELL)Interculturality, an approach to English Language Learners (ELL)
Interculturality, an approach to English Language Learners (ELL)
 
Interculturality: How can we move from racism? - Student Tennessee Education ...
Interculturality: How can we move from racism? - Student Tennessee Education ...Interculturality: How can we move from racism? - Student Tennessee Education ...
Interculturality: How can we move from racism? - Student Tennessee Education ...
 

Recently uploaded

Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde NewsFeed1
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioAlexisTorres963861
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinIpsos France
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduDreamTamilnadu
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfSABC News
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...University of Canberra
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...virgfern3011
 

Recently uploaded (9)

Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
 
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
 

WOLA - Maureen Meyer - DDHH en México

  • 1. Testimony of Maureen Meyer Senior Associate for Mexico and Central America at the Washington Office on Latin America on Human Rights in Mexico before the United States Congress Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission May 10, 2012 My name is Maureen Meyer and I am the Senior Associate for Mexico and Central America at the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA). I have worked on the defense and promotion of human rights in Mexico for over 13 years, including four years in Mexico City working for the Miguel Agustin Pro Juarez Human Rights Center. I have coordinated WOLA’s Mexico program since 2006. WOLA works closely with human rights organizations in Mexico to seek justice for victims of human rights violations. We also follow the development of U.S. security assistance to Mexico through the Merida Initiative, where we have emphasized the importance of prioritizing support for judicial and police reform efforts in Mexico and the need to hold security officers responsible for their actions. In the years I have worked on human rights in Mexico I have seen a greater openness of the Mexican government to international scrutiny and the creation of national human rights programs. Just last year, important reforms were made to Mexico’s Constitution that represent the most significant legal change to protect, promote and respect human rights in the country in decades. In spite of these efforts, human rights violations continue to be widespread and the abuses of the past - arbitrary detentions, torture, extrajudicial executions, disappearances - persist today in an environment that is made even more complex by the proliferation of organized criminal groups. For example, now an investigative police officer who tortures someone so that they sign a self- incriminating testimony may not just be a state agent, he or she may also be working for an organized criminal organization. A municipal police officer who in the past may have robbed and extorted Central American migrants as they travel through Mexico now may also be involved in criminal kidnapping rings targeting this vulnerable population. The majority of the over 50,000 dead as a result the drug war and their grieving family members more than likely will never see justice in their cases given the Mexican government’s failure to effectively investigate and prosecute these crimes. By relying on their connections to political actors, the ease of corruption, and the ability to resort to intimidation and violence, organized criminal groups in Mexico have severely weakened the state’s ability to promote and respect human rights and uphold the rule of law. The same institutional weaknesses that have allowed organized crime to flourish in the country are also at the root of human rights violations by Mexican officials. Given this context, I want to focus my testimony on the Mexican government’s efforts to implement institutional reforms to its police and judicial systems as essential elements to creating rights respecting institutions that citizens can trust. While numerous cases are documented and denounced every year, non-existing or ineffective internal and external control
  • 2. mechanisms and a weak judiciary have created a climate of permissiveness for abuse since soldiers or police are rarely sanctioned for the human rights violations they commit. Police reform During the Calderón administration, certain advances have been made to reform Mexico’s police, particularly at the federal level. Given the Mexican government’s concentration on federal reform and the fact that the United States has provided significant assistance through the Merida Initiative to the Mexican Federal Police, I will focus my testimony on this force. The establishment of the Federal Police in June 2009 was the most significant change in the restructuring of Mexico’s federal law enforcement forces. Essentially, this force integrated the former Federal Preventative Police and the Federal Investigative Agency. When it was created, the federal government also implemented measures to professionalize, train, and modernize the force. These include higher recruitment standards, a revamped police academy, and an integrated communication platform known as Plataforma Mexico, which has been the recipient of significant U.S. support.1 The Calderón administration also adopted measures to vet Mexico’s police forces and establish trust control centers (centros de control de confianza) that carry out annual reviews of police performance by utilizing a five-part evaluation to determine if officers are fit for duty. The evaluation includes a polygraph test, a drug screening examination, a psychological examination, a socio-economic investigation, and a psychometric evaluation that measures intelligence, aptitude, and personality traits. While these exams are an important tool to root out corruption, as of March 31, 2012, only 29 percent of Mexican law enforcement bodies had been evaluated.2 Information currently available from the Mexican government shows that of those evaluated, only 50 percent passed the exams.3 No information is available to assess what happens with the officers who do not pass their exams. Police experts have expressed concern about the over-reliance on these evaluations, particularly the use of polygraph exams, to vet forces. Cases have already surfaced where officers who repeatedly passed the exams were then investigated and prosecuted for links to organized crime.4 Furthermore, officers who “fail” the exams are unable to appeal the decision. Constitutional changes in 2009 have established that officers who fail the exams, or who are accused of any crime, are not able to get their jobs back, even if they are later declared innocent of any wrongdoing. Finally, the reliance on these exams also focuses exclusively on weeding out “bad apples” within the law enforcement bodies; it does not create internal 1 Eric Olson, “Police Reform and Modernization in Mexico, 2009,” Mexico Institute of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, September 2009, Washington, DC. 2 Secretaría Ejecutiva del Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública, Evaluaciones de Control de Confianza de las Instituciones relacionadas con la seguridad e impartición de justicia en el ámbito estatal y municipal, http://www.secretariadoejecutivosnsp.gob.mx/work/models/SecretariadoEjecutivo/Resource/723/1/images/Eval_Fed_ Est_Marzo.pdf 3 31 percent of those examine failed the tests and the results were pending for the remaining officers. Sistema Nacional de Seguridad Pública. Compromiso Evaluaciones de Control de Confianza Enero 2013, data from November 2011. 4 In one case, Victor Gerardo Garay Cadena, the former interim head of the Federal Preventive Police had passed three different trust control tests before being arrested for collusion with the Beltran Levya brothers. Daniel Sabet, Police Reform in Mexico: Informal Politics and the Challenge of Institutional Change, Stanford University Press, May 2012, advanced copy.
  • 3. mechanisms that would address the institutional weaknesses that have allowed corruption and abuse to flourish. Another control mechanism within the Federal Police is the Internal Affair’s Unit (Unidad de Asuntos Internos). Among other tasks, the Internal Affairs Unit is charged with investigating allegations of human rights violations by agents. An analysis of compliance with the recommendations issued by Mexico’s National Human Rights Commission (Comisión Nacional de Derechos Humanos, CNDH) in 2009 and 2010 regarding human rights violations committed by the Federal Police suggests that this body has not been effective in addressing human rights violations by this force. To date, the unit has not sanctioned any of the officers implicated in the eight cases documented by the Commission which involve violations such as arbitrary detention, illegal detention, incommunicado, torture, unlawful killing, and assaulting and robbing Central America migrants in transit through Mexico.5 It is true that compared to previous Mexican federal police forces, the current Federal Police are better trained on topics such as criminal investigative techniques, crime scene preservation and evidence collection and they also have greater technological capacity. However, the failure to implement strong accountability mechanisms has meant that the same human rights violations committed by Mexico’s federal police forces in the past have persisted into the present. In fact, complaints of abuse by Federal Police agents have increased in number just as the force itself has grown, more than tripling in size since 2006. In 2011, the CNDH received 767 complaints of human rights violations committed by the Federal Police, whereas there were 595 complaints in 2010 and only 141 complaints in 2009. One recent case is exemplary of this situation. On December 12, 2011, approximately 300 students from the Normal Rural College "Raúl Isidro Burgos" organized a protest in Chilpancingo, Guerrero to request a meeting with the governor to discuss their request for better school conditions which had remained unanswered for over three months. Over 70 Federal Police, as well as some 90 state-level investigative and preventative police, violently responded to the protests, which left two students dead. None of the students was armed. According to an in-depth report by the CNDH, 42 people were arbitrarily detained by the security forces and 24 of them were beaten with sticks and batons. Video seen by the CNDH led them to conclude that Federal Police agents had used excessive and unnecessary force in their interactions with the students and that it was this force that initiated the aggression against the students by throwing the first tear gas canister at the protesters. Although all three police forces fired indiscriminately at the students, the Federal Police was first force to fire gunshots, originally just into the air. Apart from the grave human rights violations that occurred against the students, the Commission concluded that all of the forces, including the Federal Police, had failed to adequately secure the scene of the protests and that they had altered the scene, including removing bullets and casings.6 Because of the significant assistance provided through the Merida Initiative to better train and equip Mexico’s Federal Police, the United States has a vested interest in ensuring that this new force is not undermined by a poor human rights record. We believe U.S. assistance to the Federal Police and state and municipal forces should prioritize support for the development and 5 See CNDH Recommendations 1/2010; 13/2010; 23/2010; 32/2010; 49/2010; 65/2010; 43/2009; 72/2009, www.cndh.org.mx 6 CNDH, Recomendación No. 1 VG/2012, sobre la investigación de violaciones graves a los derechos humanos relacionada con los hechos ocurridos el 12 de diciembre de 2011 en Chilpancingo, Guerrero, 27 March 2012. http://www.cndh.org.mx/node/694
  • 4. strengthening of internal and external control mechanisms well beyond the provision of polygraph equipment or support for the National Police Registry. We further encourage the State Department to determine, in consultation with the Mexican government, ways the U.S. can support the protocols published by the Mexican government on April 24, 2012. These protocols regulate the use of force for the police agencies within the Ministry of Public Security (Secretaría de Seguridad Pública) and for the armed forces, and provide guidelines on the detention and transfer of detainees to the custody of prosecutors. Justice reform Police and justice reform go hand in hand, since the police are part of a larger set of criminal justice institutions that also need to function well. The ability to investigate, prosecute and sanction effectively those who commit crimes is an essential element to ensuring the rule of law, yet it is estimated that fewer than 25 percent of crimes in Mexico are reported and that only 2 percent of those crimes result in a sentence. Numerous cases taken on by Mexican and international human rights organizations have further shown that of the people who are sentenced, many never even committed a crime. As a Mexican human rights lawyer recently stated, the Mexican justice system has become a “factory for producing guilty people.”7 In recognition of the need to change Mexico’s criminal justice system, a series of constitutional and legislative reforms were passed in 2008 that should make the justice system more effective, efficient, and transparent. A main element of these reforms is the transformation of Mexico’s legal system to an adversarial judicial model with the prosecution and defense presenting competing evidence and arguments in open court. This is dramatically different from Mexico’s traditional inquisitorial model where most of the evidenced is presented in written form to the judge and the proceedings take place largely outside of the public view. In theory, these reforms should reduce the possibility of testimony obtained through torture being admitted in legal proceedings. Other important elements of the reforms include the right to the presumption of innocence and opening up alternative means of conflict resolution in criminal procedures. Given the extent of the reforms being undertaken, the Mexican government established an eight-year transition period for the implementation of the adversarial, oral criminal justice system. So far, the implementation has been slow. According to the federal government’s Technical Secretary for the implementation of the justice reform (Secretaría Técnica del Consejo de Coordinación para la Implementación del Sistema de Justicia Penal), four years into the reform process, only three states of Mexico’s 31 (Chihuahua, the State of Mexico, and Morelos) are fully operating under the new justice system and just seven additional states are partially operational. Although several other states are making progress on the reform it is uncertain whether they will be fully instituting the required changes by the 2016 deadline. A full transition to an adversarial system is important to strengthen the rule of law and gain citizens’ trust in the Mexican judicial system. Currently, the states that are moving forward with the reforms are showing positive results. The preliminary results of a study commissioned by USAID found that in five reformed states, prosecutors are twice as efficient; fewer suspects are being held in pre-trail detention; more cases are being resolved through alternative dispute resolution mechanisms; the timeframe to resolve a case has been reduced; and judges, prosecutors and public defenders are actually doing their jobs, being present at all hearings.8 7 Daniel Blancas Madrigal, “Especialistas en derecho consideran que el encarcelamiento de inocentes en nuestro país refleja deficiencias estructurales en impartición de justicia, policías investigadores y jueces,” La Crónica de Hoy, 12 February 2012 http://www.cronica.com.mx/nota.php?id_nota=636415 8 Preliminary results of a joint study between USAID and Mexico’s Technical Secretariat (SECTEC) on the impact of justice sector reform.
  • 5. Contrary to the progress in some states, reform at the federal level has been slow. It was not until September 22, 2011, over three years after the reform went into force, that President Calderón submitted a bill to the Chamber of Deputies which would replace Mexico’s current Federal Criminal Procedure Code.9 The Mexican legislative period ended on April 30, 2012 without the code being passed and it is unlikely that any reform will be approved until after the new president takes office in December 2012. This means that many states will continue to operate under a different judicial system than the federal government. Notwithstanding the need for a new federal code, the proposal presented by President Calderón contained several articles that would have represented a setback for human rights protections, including giving the police and any other authority, such as the armed forces, the ability to carry out warrantless detentions and searches. The proposal also included exceptions to admitting evidence that otherwise would be considered invalid, which some fear could allow practices such as torture to continue.10 Apart from the challenges in reforming the system itself, old practices die hard and even in states that have implemented the adversarial criminal justice system, such as Chihuahua, confessions obtained through torture continue to be admitted in legal proceedings. Such is the case of Israel Arzate Meléndez, who was detained by Mexican soldiers on February 3, 2010, in Ciudad Juárez and taken to the military barracks where he was beaten, tortured with electric shocks to the chest and abdomen, and asphyxiated repeatedly. Israel was not seen again until the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Chihuahua presented him to the media on February 6, 2010 as one of those allegedly involved in the massacre of 15 young people that had occurred on January 30, 2010.11 In Recommendation 49/2011, the CNDH confirmed that Israel had been tortured. Although he informed the judge during his arraignment that he had been tortured into giving a false confession, she refused to view the visible marks on his body, did not open an investigation into the torture, and ordered that his trial proceed. Two years after his detention, his appeal challenging his indictment has yet to be resolved.12 Increased efforts to implement the judicial reforms, as well as measures to address historic challenges to the judicial system such as corruption and lack of transparency, are essential to overcoming the alarming 2% conviction rate for crimes in Mexico and guaranteeing more effective investigation and prosecution of crimes, including human rights violations. U.S. support for the judicial reform process has been instrumental in moving reforms forward at the state and federal level, and continued support is important to further strengthen the rule of law in Mexico. Funding for USAID Mexico’s work on justice reform at the state level is particularly important to ensure ongoing engagement in the states that have already benefited from assistance. It should 9 Diana Ragis, “New Penal Code Proposed by Calderón,” Justice in Mexico Project, Trans-Border Institute, University of San Diego, September 2011 http://justiceinmexico.org/2011/09/26/new-penal-code-proposed-by- calderon/ 10 Joint Statement by Mexican human rights organizations, “Código Federal de procedimientos Penales; regresivo y contrario al espíritu del Sistema Penal Acusatorio,” 27 March 2012 http://www.cmdpdh.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=498%3Acomunicado-conjunto-codigo- federal-de-procedimientos-penales-regresivo-y-contrario-al-espiritu-del-sistema-penal- acusatorio&catid=37%3Acomunicados&Itemid=162&lang=en 11 This refers to the killing of 15 young people attending a party in Ciudad Juarez. 12 “State and federal governments lie about the existence of evidence against Israel Arzate Meléndez,” Press release from Miguel Agustín Pro Juárez Human Rights Center (Center Prodh), Women’s Network of Ciudad Juárez, Juárez Migrant Support Center, 22 March 2012 http://centroprodh.org.mx/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=501%3Agobiernos-estatal-y-federal- mienten-sobre-la-existencia-de-pruebas-en-contra-de-israel-arzate-melendez-&catid=209%3Afront- rokstories&lang=en
  • 6. also be mentioned that several other states have requested USAID support that cannot be addressed until additional resources are secured. Conclusion Recently, the Mexican Congress passed several laws that are important for human rights and human rights defenders, including a law creating a national database for missing and disappeared persons, a law for the protection of human rights defenders and journalists, and a law for victims of violence and human rights violations. The federal government’s issuing of several protocols for Mexico’s security and judicial institutions on the adequate use of force, chain of custody, and detention procedures is also important. At the same time, a reform to Mexico’s Military Code of Justice that would have excluded from military jurisdiction human rights violations committed by soldiers against civilians, recently failed to pass due to the ongoing resistance of Mexico’s Defense Ministry. This resistance to change is illustrative of the continued challenges in combatting impunity for human rights violations in Mexico. Although legal reforms are important, it is essential to address the underlying factors within Mexico’s institutions that will change practices and behaviors. The creation of laws and guidelines or providing human rights training for security forces are only effective if the soldier or police officer knows that abuses will be investigated and sanctioned. Transparency and accountability, including internal and external controls to investigate corruption and abuse, should be priorities for the Mexican government to prevent human rights violations and to hold abusers responsible for their actions. Police and justice reform are complementary efforts, and the U.S. should prioritize its future assistance on these areas. Finally, the United States should use the leverage provided by the human rights requirements in the Merida Initiative. These requirements currently condition 15% of assistance for Mexican military and police forces until it is determined that the Mexican government is investigating and prosecuting in the civilian justice system military and police personnel who are credibly alleged to have violated human rights, the Mexican military and police are cooperating on these cases, and prohibitions on the use of testimony obtained through torture are being enforced. While we understand the magnitude of the security challenges facing Mexico, efforts to combat organized crime and violence should not be at the expense of respect for human rights. Withholding the conditioned funds until meaningful progress on these areas is made would send a clear message that the United States is concerned about the gravity of the human rights violations that have occurred in Mexico. The current violence in Mexico is often horrific, such as the 23 bodies that were found in Nuevo Laredo on Friday, May 4, many with signs of torture. The expansion of organize crime in the country has left thousands of victims and grieving family members; because it has further weakened the government's capacity to guarantee human rights, organized crime also needs to be addressed as a human rights issue. As Mexico struggles to quell the violence and the United States government considers future security assistance to Mexico, it is important to remember that the same institutional reforms that are needed to address human rights violations are also essential in order to deal effectively with organized crime and violence. We believe it is in both countries' best interest to work to curb the systematic human rights violations being committed by Mexican security forces as an important way to strengthen the rule of law and citizen security in Mexico. Thank you.