SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 51
Formula 1
By
Varun Balakrishnan
ABOUT THE CASE STUDY
Cover the resources, capabilities and attributes required

by F1 constructors.
Analyses the reason for the dominance of different
constructors during different periods.
It will analyze the reason behind their inability to sustain
their dominance and also suggest ways by which these
constructors could have sustained their competitive
advantage.
Describes three examples of the creation of competitive
advantage in a highly technological context of F1.
1945

1950

Started by Driver’s
FIA as
world
Formula A Championship

1960s

1990s

Third
highest
TV
audience

Top
FOUR
TEAMS
Williams, McLaren,
Ferrari, Benetton
SOURCES OF REVENUES
Commercial Sponsorship from non related companies

(clothing, cigarettes)

Support through provision of free product and

services such as engines, fuel and lubricants
(Renault, Ford, Shell, ELF)
System support (Andersen Consulting, Bulls and

Sun Microsystem)
Auto motive manufactures (Honda, BMW,

Toyota)
Equity holder

Prize money
FERRARI
Founder-Enzo Ferrari

Ferrari viewed as National Icon in Italy

1964-won world championship
They build their own engines, gearbox,

suspension, chassis at Maranello factory the
most up-to-date facilities in terms of designing,
developing and building all the necessary
components.

1969-merger between Fiat and Ferrari; huge

cash injection

Early 1970s-Fiat influence meant increase

pressure and resources
1971-opened their own test track at Fiorina near

Maranello Factory.

1972-73 cars were fast but not reliable

1974-change of team members

Forghieri recalled as technical director
New Team Boss-Luca Montezomolo
1974- Ferrari offered Niki Lauda to join

They designed a new car 312B but lost because of
technical difficult.
1975-tables turn

312T won both Driver’s and Constructor’s
Championship
1976- Niki Lauda met an accident but managed to

grab constructors championship
1977-won both the championships
Lauda left
1979- was the last time they won the championship

for next 21 years
mid 80s-more investment into facilities but no result

appeared
1982-83 finally investment paid off as they won

constructor’s championship
1988-Enzo Ferrari died
1992-luco Montezomolo took over as CEO

2000- return of glory with Schumacher's victory
MCLAREN
➤Founded by New Zealand F1 Driver Bruce McLaren in

1966
➤Had their first major victory in Belgium Grand Prix of
1968
➤ McLaren was killed two years later while testing the
American Sports Car
➤Lawyer & friend Teddy Mayer took over as team Principal
& team continued to develop
➤In 1974, sponsorship from Philip Morris, for Marlboro
brand which lasted till 1996
➤In 1980, Ron Dennis became joint team principal
➤McLaren Have Taken Part In 440 Grand Prix
EMINENT MCLAREN DRIVERS

EMERSON
FITTIPALDI
(1974)

MIKA HAKKINEN
(1998,99)

JAMES HUNT
(1976)

NIKI LAUDA
(1984)

ALAIN PROST
(1989)

AYRTON
SENNA
(1988,89,90,91)
TIMELINE
1966
BIRTH

1968

1974

1980

1986

1987-88

RON
BARNARD
FIRST
Prost
1ST
OUT,
MAJOR SPONSORSHIP DENNIS
& Senna
COMES
WIN (MARLBORO)
MURRAY IN were
IN

recruited,
HONDA
CAME IN
GOLDEN PERIOD FOR MCLAREN
1988

1989

➤ McLaren Won The
Championship From
1988-91
➤ They Won 38 Out
Of 48 Races
Between these years

1990

1991
GOLDEN YEARS OF MCLAREN
➤In 1988, McLaren won 15 out of 16 Grand Prix

➤In 1988, Dennis began a project on McLaren road-

going car- McLaren F1 was launched in 1994 and with
a price tag of ₤ 634,000 and a top speed of 231 mph
became the most expensive and fastest road-going
car in the world.
➤The design skills of Gordon Murray was mainly used
in this car.
PILLARS OF MCLAREN
➤John Barnard was considered to be the reason for

McLaren’s developing dominance
➤The partnership between Dennis and Barnard had
been stormy but they achieved many targets
➤Dennis providing the managerial and commercial
acumens
➤Barnard highly innovative design skills
RON
DENNIS
JOHN
BARNARD
V/S
PROST

SENNA

➤Prost & Senna were real contrasts
➤Senna was fast & had unparralel commitment to win
races
➤Prost was fast too, but a great tactician, making sure the
whole team was behind him
➤Senna’s brilliance was undisputed at Japanese Grand
Prix when he pushed Prost’s Ferrari off road to win the
race
➤Senna passed away in 1994
SUCCESS OF MCLAREN
➤McLaren was successful because Ron Dennis had

negotiated exclusive for Honda Motors
➤Ron Dennis’s negotiating & marketing abilities were
remarkable throughout F1
➤Barnard once likened working with Dennis as 'being in
a room with a hand grenade rolling about without its
pin, about to go off and make a horrible mess.‘
McLarens Decline
➤ In 1992, McLarens slippage came
➤ Renault engines in Williams started gaining pace
➤ In September, Honda made it clear that they are backing out of F1

because of achievements of goals & finding new challenges
➤ Dennis’s lame reaction to this setback made them move towards-

Ford engines, which were easily available
➤ Senna still managed to win some races but eventually moved on to

Williams in 1993
➤ Having tried Peugeot engines in 1991 then moved to Mercedes in

1995
➤ In 1996, relationship between McLaren & Philip Morris came to an

end, Philip Morris moving support to their Marlboro brand to
Ferrari driver Michael Schumacher

1992
RISING FROM THE ASH
➤In 1997, McLaren acquired the services of Williams

designer Adrian Newey for a reputed 2 million contract.
He designed talents coupled with a more powerful and
reliable Mercedes engine meant that McLaren again
became the team to beat
WILLIAMS
1968

• FRANK WILLIAMS(RACING CARS) ESTAB.

1977

• WILLIAMS GRAND PRIX ENGG. ESTAB.

1980-81

• ALAN JONES –DRIVERS TITLE
• WON CONSTRUCTORS CHAMPIONSHIP

1986

• FRANK WILLIAMS ACCIDENT

1987

• HONDA MADE ENGINES AVAILABLE TO
LOTUS
1988

• HONDA MADE ENGINES AVAILABLE TO McLaren
• NIGEL MANSELL JOINED FERRARI

1990

• TIED UP WITH RENAULT

1991

• NIGEL MANSELL RETURNED

1992

• NIGEL MANSELL WON F1 CONSTRUCTORS
• HE LEFT AT YEAR-END

1993

• ALAIN PROST WON F1 CHAMPIONSHIP
STRATEGY OF WILLIAMS
More functional than innovative

LOTUS – Ground Effect and Active

Suspension
McLaren – Carbon Composite monoceque
FERRARI – Semi-automatic Gearbox
HOW DOES THE RESOURCE
BASED VIEW APPLY TO
WINNING FORMULA ONE
CHAMPIONSHIP???
FERRARI AND ITS RENAISSANCE IN THE MID
1970S
Availability of technical expertise and

resources

Cash flow from Fiat and Ferrari Merger
Management style of Team – Driver Niki

Lauda, Designer Mauro Forghieri and manager
Luca Montezemolo

Own test track a few yards away from the

factory
MCLAREN
Put together best of everything
Secured exclusive use of Honda

Sponsorship from Philip Morris
Secured the services of the best driver around (Senna

and Prost)
Commercial and leadership skills of Ron Dennis

Ron Dennis and John Barnard partnership stormy but

useful
WILLIAMS
Focus on engineering
FW06 Patrick Head with Saudi Airlines helped

winning constructors

Car development process was top priority

supported by team of designers
Development of powerful and reliable engine

perfectly complemented by chassis
Long standing partnership of Frank Williams and

Patrick Head

Wide ranging relationship with engine supplier

Renault
WHAT CORE COMPETENCIES
WERE KEY TO EACH OF THE
MAIN WINNERS???
CORE COMPETENCY:
➤ The main strengths or strategic advantages of a business.
➤ Pooled Knowledge + Technical Capacities = Competitiveness
➤ It has to fulfill three key criteria's :

➤ It is not easy for competitors to imitate.
➤ It can be reused widely for many products and markets.
➤ It must contribute to the end consumer's experienced benefits

and the value of the product/service to its customers.
MCLAREN
➤ Partnership with Philip Morris and appointment of Ron

Dennis

➤ Innovative skills of John Barnard
➤ Collaboration with Honda
➤ Signing of Prost and Senna
FERRARI
➤ Maranello Factory

➤ Identity
➤ Takeover By Fiat
➤ The Trinity of Mauro Forghieri + Luca

Montezemolo + Niki Lauda
➤ 312T
WILLIAMS
Collaboration with Renault RS3 V10 and FW15 chassis
PATRICK HEAD’S innovation namely semi-automatic

gear box, drive by wire and active suspension system
Exploiting the technology available
Combination of ten things which gave them a couple
of seconds of advantage
TO WHAT EXTENT DID THE
KEY COMPETENCIES VARY
OVER TIME IN THE FORMULA 1
CHAMPIONSHIP???
FERRARI
The renaissance of Ferrari in mid 1970’s

Their unique approach- creating everything of

their own- gearboxes, engines, suspensions,
chassis- made in their home town Maranello
factory
They also were very rich in the technical

expertise and recourses
They returned to stage 1999-2003: Worked

together -driver Niki Lauda, designer Mauro
Forghieri and team manager Luca
Montezemolo
Later in 1999-2003, Ferrari was back to their stage

and glory and they were working with Michael
Schumacher, a key element, and also their focus was
support team which was a very efficient one.
MCLAREN
McLaren and Honda domination in the late 1980s

McLaren were successful because they were able to put

together the best of everything.
They secured exclusive use of the Honda engine at a time
when it was the most powerful and reliable- Honda
engines won for 6 consecutive years- one for Williams and
4 for McLaren
They were also able to secure the services of the

best drivers around (Senna and Prost).
This was due to the high level of funds made

available by sponsor Philip Morris, Marlboro.
WILLIAMS
Williams and the technological revolution: the mid

1990s

Williams’ success was due to their engineering focus.
Frank Williams was very dedicated to his passion and

bought many new changes in the team.
This engineering focus can be attributed to the

long-standing partnership of Frank Williams and
Patrick Head.
Collaboration with Renault RS3 V10 and
FW15 chassis
THE VARYING FACTOR IN THEIR
COMPETENCIES ARE
9
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

9
7

7

9

7
6

FERRARI

MCLAREN
CAR

DRIVERS

6

6

WILLIAMS
SUPPORTING TEAM
Formula 1 Dominance: Resources, Capabilities and Innovation

More Related Content

What's hot

Beginners Guide to Formula 1
Beginners Guide to Formula 1Beginners Guide to Formula 1
Beginners Guide to Formula 1Simon Lord
 
All about formula one
All about formula oneAll about formula one
All about formula oneHimani Shukla
 
Formula One Project
Formula One ProjectFormula One Project
Formula One Projectiteclearners
 
Power point formula 1
Power point formula 1Power point formula 1
Power point formula 1GUIM9
 
Marketing & PR - F1 Development Presentation
Marketing & PR - F1 Development PresentationMarketing & PR - F1 Development Presentation
Marketing & PR - F1 Development Presentationliamfisher1994
 
Ferrari Management - Branded.
Ferrari Management - Branded.Ferrari Management - Branded.
Ferrari Management - Branded.Kristy_Haefelin
 
Fernando Alonso
Fernando AlonsoFernando Alonso
Fernando Alonsoasollero
 
Senza nome ferrari
Senza nome ferrariSenza nome ferrari
Senza nome ferrarihatepain99
 
FCA - 6 May - Ferrari brand
FCA - 6 May - Ferrari brandFCA - 6 May - Ferrari brand
FCA - 6 May - Ferrari brandautoblogpuntoit
 
Ferrari
FerrariFerrari
FerrariGiga B
 
Ferrari By Alex
Ferrari  By AlexFerrari  By Alex
Ferrari By Alexrommelc
 
Presentation ferrari
Presentation ferrariPresentation ferrari
Presentation ferrariDon Luigi
 

What's hot (20)

Beginners Guide to Formula 1
Beginners Guide to Formula 1Beginners Guide to Formula 1
Beginners Guide to Formula 1
 
All about formula one
All about formula oneAll about formula one
All about formula one
 
Formula One Project
Formula One ProjectFormula One Project
Formula One Project
 
Power point formula 1
Power point formula 1Power point formula 1
Power point formula 1
 
Marketing & PR - F1 Development Presentation
Marketing & PR - F1 Development PresentationMarketing & PR - F1 Development Presentation
Marketing & PR - F1 Development Presentation
 
Ferrari
FerrariFerrari
Ferrari
 
Ferrari Management - Branded.
Ferrari Management - Branded.Ferrari Management - Branded.
Ferrari Management - Branded.
 
Fernando Alonso
Fernando AlonsoFernando Alonso
Fernando Alonso
 
Ferrari
FerrariFerrari
Ferrari
 
f1 presentation.pdf
f1 presentation.pdff1 presentation.pdf
f1 presentation.pdf
 
Formula 1
Formula 1Formula 1
Formula 1
 
Senza nome ferrari
Senza nome ferrariSenza nome ferrari
Senza nome ferrari
 
FCA - 6 May - Ferrari brand
FCA - 6 May - Ferrari brandFCA - 6 May - Ferrari brand
FCA - 6 May - Ferrari brand
 
Ferrari
FerrariFerrari
Ferrari
 
Ferrari By Alex
Ferrari  By AlexFerrari  By Alex
Ferrari By Alex
 
Formula 1
Formula 1Formula 1
Formula 1
 
Presentation ferrari
Presentation ferrariPresentation ferrari
Presentation ferrari
 
Ferrari
FerrariFerrari
Ferrari
 
Fernando Alonso
Fernando AlonsoFernando Alonso
Fernando Alonso
 
PRESENTATION ON BMW
PRESENTATION ON BMWPRESENTATION ON BMW
PRESENTATION ON BMW
 

Viewers also liked

Formula 1 cegp
Formula 1 cegpFormula 1 cegp
Formula 1 cegpcarlosuny
 
Proyecto informatica-diapositivas-fin
Proyecto informatica-diapositivas-finProyecto informatica-diapositivas-fin
Proyecto informatica-diapositivas-finJoaquin Correa
 
Pret Company case, BOS (2010, UK)
Pret Company case, BOS (2010, UK)Pret Company case, BOS (2010, UK)
Pret Company case, BOS (2010, UK)Mette Gert
 
Formula 1 impact
Formula 1 impactFormula 1 impact
Formula 1 impact943MANOJ
 
El planeta marte
El planeta marteEl planeta marte
El planeta marteDemilovato
 
Differentiation and positioning
Differentiation and positioningDifferentiation and positioning
Differentiation and positioningNadia Ahmed
 
Customer Driven Marketing Strategy-Creating Value for Target Customers
Customer Driven Marketing Strategy-Creating Value for Target CustomersCustomer Driven Marketing Strategy-Creating Value for Target Customers
Customer Driven Marketing Strategy-Creating Value for Target CustomersIJ Felecio
 
Coke brand positioning statement
Coke brand positioning statementCoke brand positioning statement
Coke brand positioning statementDon Na
 

Viewers also liked (15)

Formula 1
Formula 1Formula 1
Formula 1
 
Power Point Fórmula 1.
Power Point Fórmula 1.Power Point Fórmula 1.
Power Point Fórmula 1.
 
Value Innovation
Value InnovationValue Innovation
Value Innovation
 
Fórmula 1
Fórmula 1Fórmula 1
Fórmula 1
 
Formula 1 cegp
Formula 1 cegpFormula 1 cegp
Formula 1 cegp
 
PRET A MANGER
PRET A MANGERPRET A MANGER
PRET A MANGER
 
Proyecto informatica-diapositivas-fin
Proyecto informatica-diapositivas-finProyecto informatica-diapositivas-fin
Proyecto informatica-diapositivas-fin
 
Ferrari
FerrariFerrari
Ferrari
 
Pret Company case, BOS (2010, UK)
Pret Company case, BOS (2010, UK)Pret Company case, BOS (2010, UK)
Pret Company case, BOS (2010, UK)
 
Formula 1 impact
Formula 1 impactFormula 1 impact
Formula 1 impact
 
Cidade do porto
Cidade do portoCidade do porto
Cidade do porto
 
El planeta marte
El planeta marteEl planeta marte
El planeta marte
 
Differentiation and positioning
Differentiation and positioningDifferentiation and positioning
Differentiation and positioning
 
Customer Driven Marketing Strategy-Creating Value for Target Customers
Customer Driven Marketing Strategy-Creating Value for Target CustomersCustomer Driven Marketing Strategy-Creating Value for Target Customers
Customer Driven Marketing Strategy-Creating Value for Target Customers
 
Coke brand positioning statement
Coke brand positioning statementCoke brand positioning statement
Coke brand positioning statement
 

Similar to Formula 1 Dominance: Resources, Capabilities and Innovation

Similar to Formula 1 Dominance: Resources, Capabilities and Innovation (20)

FERRARI ASWIN T
FERRARI    ASWIN TFERRARI    ASWIN T
FERRARI ASWIN T
 
Ferrari
FerrariFerrari
Ferrari
 
Introduction To Formula 1 and f1111.pptx
Introduction To Formula 1 and f1111.pptxIntroduction To Formula 1 and f1111.pptx
Introduction To Formula 1 and f1111.pptx
 
ferrari
ferrariferrari
ferrari
 
Hw1 ferrari final
Hw1 ferrari finalHw1 ferrari final
Hw1 ferrari final
 
Ferrari 2
Ferrari 2Ferrari 2
Ferrari 2
 
FERRARI (BRANDING)
FERRARI (BRANDING)FERRARI (BRANDING)
FERRARI (BRANDING)
 
Michelin excellence in sport and supersport
Michelin excellence in sport and supersportMichelin excellence in sport and supersport
Michelin excellence in sport and supersport
 
Dr Patrick Treacy Safety In Formula 1
Dr Patrick Treacy Safety In Formula 1Dr Patrick Treacy Safety In Formula 1
Dr Patrick Treacy Safety In Formula 1
 
Formula 1 Quiz Prelims
Formula 1 Quiz PrelimsFormula 1 Quiz Prelims
Formula 1 Quiz Prelims
 
Michael schumacher
Michael schumacherMichael schumacher
Michael schumacher
 
Formula ford article
Formula ford articleFormula ford article
Formula ford article
 
Motorsports quiz
Motorsports quizMotorsports quiz
Motorsports quiz
 
4ps of Marketing Mix(MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE).pptx
4ps of Marketing Mix(MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE).pptx 4ps of Marketing Mix(MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE).pptx
4ps of Marketing Mix(MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE).pptx
 
ferrari
ferrariferrari
ferrari
 
Schumacher1
Schumacher1Schumacher1
Schumacher1
 
Mrf tyres india
Mrf tyres indiaMrf tyres india
Mrf tyres india
 
Schumacher
SchumacherSchumacher
Schumacher
 
Formula 1
Formula 1Formula 1
Formula 1
 
AN OVERVIEW ON THE MICHELIN
AN OVERVIEW ON THE MICHELINAN OVERVIEW ON THE MICHELIN
AN OVERVIEW ON THE MICHELIN
 

Recently uploaded

DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 GACOR
 
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxPGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxaleonardes
 
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalry
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports RivalryPPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalry
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalryanirbannath184
 
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfClash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfMuhammad Hashim
 
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docx
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docxItaly Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docx
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docxWorld Wide Tickets And Hospitality
 
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEProject & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEDeShawn Ellis
 
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...Eticketing.co
 
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxJORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxArturo Pacheco Alvarez
 
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxBADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxvillenoc6
 
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...World Wide Tickets And Hospitality
 
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxBenifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxsherrymieg19
 

Recently uploaded (12)

DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
 
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxPGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
 
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalry
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports RivalryPPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalry
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalry
 
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfClash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
 
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docx
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docxItaly Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docx
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docx
 
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEProject & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
 
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...
 
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxJORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
 
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxBADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
 
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...
 
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxBenifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
 
NATIONAL SPORTS DAY WRITTEN QUIZ by QUI9
NATIONAL SPORTS DAY WRITTEN QUIZ by QUI9NATIONAL SPORTS DAY WRITTEN QUIZ by QUI9
NATIONAL SPORTS DAY WRITTEN QUIZ by QUI9
 

Formula 1 Dominance: Resources, Capabilities and Innovation

  • 2.
  • 3. ABOUT THE CASE STUDY Cover the resources, capabilities and attributes required by F1 constructors. Analyses the reason for the dominance of different constructors during different periods. It will analyze the reason behind their inability to sustain their dominance and also suggest ways by which these constructors could have sustained their competitive advantage. Describes three examples of the creation of competitive advantage in a highly technological context of F1.
  • 4. 1945 1950 Started by Driver’s FIA as world Formula A Championship 1960s 1990s Third highest TV audience Top FOUR TEAMS Williams, McLaren, Ferrari, Benetton
  • 5. SOURCES OF REVENUES Commercial Sponsorship from non related companies (clothing, cigarettes) Support through provision of free product and services such as engines, fuel and lubricants (Renault, Ford, Shell, ELF)
  • 6. System support (Andersen Consulting, Bulls and Sun Microsystem) Auto motive manufactures (Honda, BMW, Toyota) Equity holder Prize money
  • 8. Founder-Enzo Ferrari Ferrari viewed as National Icon in Italy 1964-won world championship
  • 9. They build their own engines, gearbox, suspension, chassis at Maranello factory the most up-to-date facilities in terms of designing, developing and building all the necessary components. 1969-merger between Fiat and Ferrari; huge cash injection Early 1970s-Fiat influence meant increase pressure and resources
  • 10. 1971-opened their own test track at Fiorina near Maranello Factory. 1972-73 cars were fast but not reliable 1974-change of team members Forghieri recalled as technical director New Team Boss-Luca Montezomolo
  • 11. 1974- Ferrari offered Niki Lauda to join They designed a new car 312B but lost because of technical difficult. 1975-tables turn 312T won both Driver’s and Constructor’s Championship 1976- Niki Lauda met an accident but managed to grab constructors championship
  • 12. 1977-won both the championships Lauda left 1979- was the last time they won the championship for next 21 years mid 80s-more investment into facilities but no result appeared
  • 13. 1982-83 finally investment paid off as they won constructor’s championship 1988-Enzo Ferrari died 1992-luco Montezomolo took over as CEO 2000- return of glory with Schumacher's victory
  • 15. ➤Founded by New Zealand F1 Driver Bruce McLaren in 1966 ➤Had their first major victory in Belgium Grand Prix of 1968 ➤ McLaren was killed two years later while testing the American Sports Car ➤Lawyer & friend Teddy Mayer took over as team Principal & team continued to develop ➤In 1974, sponsorship from Philip Morris, for Marlboro brand which lasted till 1996 ➤In 1980, Ron Dennis became joint team principal ➤McLaren Have Taken Part In 440 Grand Prix
  • 16. EMINENT MCLAREN DRIVERS EMERSON FITTIPALDI (1974) MIKA HAKKINEN (1998,99) JAMES HUNT (1976) NIKI LAUDA (1984) ALAIN PROST (1989) AYRTON SENNA (1988,89,90,91)
  • 17. TIMELINE 1966 BIRTH 1968 1974 1980 1986 1987-88 RON BARNARD FIRST Prost 1ST OUT, MAJOR SPONSORSHIP DENNIS & Senna COMES WIN (MARLBORO) MURRAY IN were IN recruited, HONDA CAME IN
  • 18. GOLDEN PERIOD FOR MCLAREN 1988 1989 ➤ McLaren Won The Championship From 1988-91 ➤ They Won 38 Out Of 48 Races Between these years 1990 1991
  • 19. GOLDEN YEARS OF MCLAREN ➤In 1988, McLaren won 15 out of 16 Grand Prix ➤In 1988, Dennis began a project on McLaren road- going car- McLaren F1 was launched in 1994 and with a price tag of ₤ 634,000 and a top speed of 231 mph became the most expensive and fastest road-going car in the world. ➤The design skills of Gordon Murray was mainly used in this car.
  • 20. PILLARS OF MCLAREN ➤John Barnard was considered to be the reason for McLaren’s developing dominance ➤The partnership between Dennis and Barnard had been stormy but they achieved many targets ➤Dennis providing the managerial and commercial acumens ➤Barnard highly innovative design skills RON DENNIS JOHN BARNARD
  • 21. V/S PROST SENNA ➤Prost & Senna were real contrasts ➤Senna was fast & had unparralel commitment to win races ➤Prost was fast too, but a great tactician, making sure the whole team was behind him ➤Senna’s brilliance was undisputed at Japanese Grand Prix when he pushed Prost’s Ferrari off road to win the race ➤Senna passed away in 1994
  • 22. SUCCESS OF MCLAREN ➤McLaren was successful because Ron Dennis had negotiated exclusive for Honda Motors ➤Ron Dennis’s negotiating & marketing abilities were remarkable throughout F1 ➤Barnard once likened working with Dennis as 'being in a room with a hand grenade rolling about without its pin, about to go off and make a horrible mess.‘
  • 23. McLarens Decline ➤ In 1992, McLarens slippage came ➤ Renault engines in Williams started gaining pace ➤ In September, Honda made it clear that they are backing out of F1 because of achievements of goals & finding new challenges ➤ Dennis’s lame reaction to this setback made them move towards- Ford engines, which were easily available ➤ Senna still managed to win some races but eventually moved on to Williams in 1993 ➤ Having tried Peugeot engines in 1991 then moved to Mercedes in 1995 ➤ In 1996, relationship between McLaren & Philip Morris came to an end, Philip Morris moving support to their Marlboro brand to Ferrari driver Michael Schumacher 1992
  • 24. RISING FROM THE ASH ➤In 1997, McLaren acquired the services of Williams designer Adrian Newey for a reputed 2 million contract. He designed talents coupled with a more powerful and reliable Mercedes engine meant that McLaren again became the team to beat
  • 26. 1968 • FRANK WILLIAMS(RACING CARS) ESTAB. 1977 • WILLIAMS GRAND PRIX ENGG. ESTAB. 1980-81 • ALAN JONES –DRIVERS TITLE • WON CONSTRUCTORS CHAMPIONSHIP 1986 • FRANK WILLIAMS ACCIDENT 1987 • HONDA MADE ENGINES AVAILABLE TO LOTUS
  • 27. 1988 • HONDA MADE ENGINES AVAILABLE TO McLaren • NIGEL MANSELL JOINED FERRARI 1990 • TIED UP WITH RENAULT 1991 • NIGEL MANSELL RETURNED 1992 • NIGEL MANSELL WON F1 CONSTRUCTORS • HE LEFT AT YEAR-END 1993 • ALAIN PROST WON F1 CHAMPIONSHIP
  • 28. STRATEGY OF WILLIAMS More functional than innovative LOTUS – Ground Effect and Active Suspension McLaren – Carbon Composite monoceque FERRARI – Semi-automatic Gearbox
  • 29. HOW DOES THE RESOURCE BASED VIEW APPLY TO WINNING FORMULA ONE CHAMPIONSHIP???
  • 30.
  • 31. FERRARI AND ITS RENAISSANCE IN THE MID 1970S Availability of technical expertise and resources Cash flow from Fiat and Ferrari Merger
  • 32. Management style of Team – Driver Niki Lauda, Designer Mauro Forghieri and manager Luca Montezemolo Own test track a few yards away from the factory
  • 33. MCLAREN Put together best of everything Secured exclusive use of Honda Sponsorship from Philip Morris
  • 34. Secured the services of the best driver around (Senna and Prost) Commercial and leadership skills of Ron Dennis Ron Dennis and John Barnard partnership stormy but useful
  • 35. WILLIAMS Focus on engineering FW06 Patrick Head with Saudi Airlines helped winning constructors Car development process was top priority supported by team of designers
  • 36. Development of powerful and reliable engine perfectly complemented by chassis Long standing partnership of Frank Williams and Patrick Head Wide ranging relationship with engine supplier Renault
  • 37. WHAT CORE COMPETENCIES WERE KEY TO EACH OF THE MAIN WINNERS???
  • 38. CORE COMPETENCY: ➤ The main strengths or strategic advantages of a business. ➤ Pooled Knowledge + Technical Capacities = Competitiveness ➤ It has to fulfill three key criteria's : ➤ It is not easy for competitors to imitate. ➤ It can be reused widely for many products and markets. ➤ It must contribute to the end consumer's experienced benefits and the value of the product/service to its customers.
  • 39. MCLAREN ➤ Partnership with Philip Morris and appointment of Ron Dennis ➤ Innovative skills of John Barnard ➤ Collaboration with Honda ➤ Signing of Prost and Senna
  • 40. FERRARI ➤ Maranello Factory ➤ Identity ➤ Takeover By Fiat ➤ The Trinity of Mauro Forghieri + Luca Montezemolo + Niki Lauda ➤ 312T
  • 41. WILLIAMS Collaboration with Renault RS3 V10 and FW15 chassis PATRICK HEAD’S innovation namely semi-automatic gear box, drive by wire and active suspension system Exploiting the technology available Combination of ten things which gave them a couple of seconds of advantage
  • 42. TO WHAT EXTENT DID THE KEY COMPETENCIES VARY OVER TIME IN THE FORMULA 1 CHAMPIONSHIP???
  • 43. FERRARI The renaissance of Ferrari in mid 1970’s Their unique approach- creating everything of their own- gearboxes, engines, suspensions, chassis- made in their home town Maranello factory
  • 44. They also were very rich in the technical expertise and recourses They returned to stage 1999-2003: Worked together -driver Niki Lauda, designer Mauro Forghieri and team manager Luca Montezemolo
  • 45. Later in 1999-2003, Ferrari was back to their stage and glory and they were working with Michael Schumacher, a key element, and also their focus was support team which was a very efficient one.
  • 46. MCLAREN McLaren and Honda domination in the late 1980s McLaren were successful because they were able to put together the best of everything. They secured exclusive use of the Honda engine at a time when it was the most powerful and reliable- Honda engines won for 6 consecutive years- one for Williams and 4 for McLaren
  • 47. They were also able to secure the services of the best drivers around (Senna and Prost). This was due to the high level of funds made available by sponsor Philip Morris, Marlboro.
  • 48. WILLIAMS Williams and the technological revolution: the mid 1990s Williams’ success was due to their engineering focus. Frank Williams was very dedicated to his passion and bought many new changes in the team.
  • 49. This engineering focus can be attributed to the long-standing partnership of Frank Williams and Patrick Head. Collaboration with Renault RS3 V10 and FW15 chassis
  • 50. THE VARYING FACTOR IN THEIR COMPETENCIES ARE 9 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 9 7 7 9 7 6 FERRARI MCLAREN CAR DRIVERS 6 6 WILLIAMS SUPPORTING TEAM

Editor's Notes

  1. The main strengths or strategic advantages of a business. Core competencies are the combination of pooled knowledge and technical capacities that allow a business to be competitive in the marketplace. Theoretically, a core competency should allow a company to expand into new end markets as well as provide a significant benefit to customers. It should also be hard for competitors to replicate. 
  2. Masterminds : Ron Dennis and John BarnardRon Dennis:Mechanic,team principal, a master negotiator,promgmt style
  3. Ferrari are distinctive- they always have done everything themselves : Engine,Gearbox,suspension and chassis..upto date facilities in terms of designing,developing and building all necessary components for a race car.Resources,technicalteam,own race track.2. Identity :Ferraris have always been red,the national racing color of Italy.Black Prancing horse.Very little sign of sponsorship.Difficult for others to imitate themEnzo Ferrari allowed takeover from Fiat,huge cash injection..allowedenzo to conc on his first love,motor racing.Forghieri : Brilliant technician,Ferraris of the 60s. Designer..creative ideas and intensive testing.Montezemolo : qualified lawyer,manager…kicking enzo’s ‘divide and rule’ out.312T : 12 cylinder engine and a revolutionary transverse(sideways mounted),which offered better balance