2. Background
âą First civilian government completing itâs term
âą Chief Election Commissioner appointed through
parliamentary consensus for the first time in the
countryâs history
âą Caretaker government to be decided in
consultation instead of being chosen by the
president
3. The Political Barometer Survey
âą Covers a wide range of socio-political indicators
âą Conducted across broad sections of the society
âą Rapid assessment around 1,300 respondents in 52
districts, reflecting on issues like electoral reform,
governance, security, interprovincial relations, arts
and culture, civil rights, and foreign policy
âą Strata take account of ethno-linguistic lines instead
of the traditional provincial demarcation
4. Sampling
âą Demographic sample based on the population
census of the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics
âą Stratified Sampling
â« Ethno-linguistic
â« Gender
â« Urban/Rural
â« Age
â« Income
â« Educational qualification
5. Questionnaire, interviews, and
challenges
âą Both open-ended as well as close-ended questions to
minimize biases
âą Conducted in 52 districts across Balochistan, FATA,
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab, and Sindh
âą Occasional reluctance and difficulty by respondents to
respond to a few questions
âą The data was verified through randomly contacting
reluctant respondants
âą Respondentsâ understanding of technical terms like MFN
6. Issues
Electoral
Process
Civil
Military Corruption
Relations
Inter-
Foreign
provincial
Policy
relations
Political Internal
Economy Security
7. Electoral Process
Most transparent party while contesting
elections
Others PPP
25% 24%
PMLN
PTI 24%
27%
16. Relations with neighbors
Preference to vote for a party that...
Opposes
peaceful ties
with India
17%
Maintains a
neutral stance
38%
Pledges peaceful
ties with India
28%
A party's stance
on relations with
India will not
factor in my
decision making
17%
17. Should Pakistan promote a government
favourable to its own interests in
Afghanistan?
Maybe Yes
32% 33%
No
35%
18. Party that can best handle Pakistan's
foreign affairs
Others
20% PPP
30%
PTI
21%
PMLN
29%
19. Internal Security
Government's engagement with Taliban
should focus on...
Other
1%
Negotiation Negotiation
and military 36%
action
39%
Military
action
24%
20. Party that can best counter religious
violence
PPP
Others 24%
30%
PMLN
PTI 26%
20%
21. Party that can best counter sectarian
violence
PPP
22%
Others
32%
PMLN
24%
PTI
22%
22. Political Economy
Economic issues facing Pakistan
Unemploym
Others ent
23% 21%
Foreign debt
Energy
burden
shortage
12%
19%
Inflation Currency
12% devaluation
13%
23. Pressing issues based on education
levels
Higher Levels of Education Lower Levels of Education
âą Extremism âą Inflation
âą Political instability âą Gender
âą Interprovincial discrimination
problems âą Food shortages
29. Power: equitable
distribution between all
provinces?
Maybe Yes
19% 12%
Water: equitable distribution
No between all provinces?
69%
Maybe Yes
20% 17%
No
63%
39. Opinions on domestic violence
Sometimes No opinion
justified, som 5%
etimes
unjustified
16%
Acceptable
2%
Unacceptable
77%
40. Opinions on honour killings
No opinion
7%
Acceptable
Sometimes 11%
justified, som
etimes
unjustified
19%
Unacceptable
63%
41. Lifestyle and cultural issues influencing
voterâs preference
Its policy on
women
contesting
elections
Others 15%
33%
Its policy on
coeducation
14%
Its policy on
purdah
Its policy on
14%
performing
arts Its policy on
13% women
working
alongside men
11%
42. Minorities
Should non-Muslims have rights equal to
the rights of Muslims in Pakistan?
Maybe
15%
No
13%
Yes
72%
43. Should non-Muslims have freedom to
practice their religion in Pakistan?
Maybe
10%
No
8%
Yes
82%
44. Should there be a separate voters list for
minorities in Pakistan?
Maybe
28% Yes
34%
No
38%
45. Opinions on the fairness and justness of
blasphemy laws in Pakistan
Maybe
23%
Yes
38%
No
39%
46. Voting trends
Party support within each age bracket*
PPP PMLN PTI Others
18%
26% 27% 25%
8%
23% 19% 18%
46%
22% 28%
24%
27% 32% 28% 28%
18-35 36-50 51-70 70+
*Does not include respondents who selected no party
47. Party support across different ethnicities
PPP PML-N PTI ANP BNP-Mengal
44%
11%
55%
46% 44% 43% 47%
34%
Sindhi Seraiki Hindko Punjabi Pakhtun Baloch
48. Voting trends vis-Ă -vis voting history
âą Vote bank for PML-N ï Stagnant
âą Vote bank for PPP ï Declined
âą Vote bank for PTI ï Stronger urban base
49. Parties' supporters by monthly family
income
PPP PMLN PTI MQM JI PMLQ
Above Rs. 100,000 1% 3% 6% 9% 5% 3%
Rs. 45,000-100,000 2% 5% 10% 16% 8% 13%
Rs. 10,000-45,000 53% 55% 59% 50% 57% 41%
Rs. 10,000 or less 44% 37% 26% 25% 30% 44%
50. âą PPP
â« Roughly one-third of the respondents earning
below Rs. 30,000 indicate a preference for PPP
â« Reinforces the pro-poor image of the party
â« Support from those earning over Rs. 30,000
dropped to 10.8%
âą PML-N
â« Support appears similar across all income groups
âą PTI
â« 33% of those earning over Rs. 250,000 intend to
vote for the party
51. âą MQM
â« 33% of those earning over Rs. 250,000 intend to
vote for the party
â« Only 4% of those earning between Rs. 100,000
and 250,000 expressed intention to vote for the
party
â« Below 100K
âą Support for smaller parties appears to weaken as
income level rises
âą PTI eroding PPP votebank
53. Scenario 1
âą IF:
â« Electoral alliance between PPP and its current
allies, ANP, MQM, and PML-Q
â« Anti-PPP alliance at the same time: PML-
N, JUI, JI, minus PTI
âą THEN:
â« PPP and alliance may capture 38.1% of the vote
â« Anti-PPP alliance, minus PTI, may secure 29.5%
â« Together with the PTI, the anti-PPP alliance may
give a tougher time to PPP
54. Scenario 2
âą IF:
â« PPP partners with current allies â ANP and PML-Q
â« MQM opts for the anti-PPP alliance; PTI decides not to
be part of either
âą THEN:
â« PPP and allies secure 33.9% of the votes
â« Opposition alliance secures 33.7% of the votes
â« Weaker government against a stronger opposition
âą Option 1:
â« PML-N led govt.: PPP and PTI form opposition
âą Option 2:
â« PPP led govt.: PML-N and PTI form opposition
55. Scenario 3
âą IF:
â« Electoral alliance between PPP and current allies â
ANP, MQM, and PML-Q
â« Opposing alliance between PML-N and PTI
âą THEN:
â« PML-N and PTI jointly sweep through, capturing
45.0% of the votes ï relatively stable govt. at the
centre
â« Anti-PPP parties may also join in
56. Scenario 4
âą IF:
â« Electoral alliance between PPP and PTI
â« PML-N led strong opposing alliance
âą THEN:
â« PPP and PTI secure 49.3% of the votes ï stable
govt. at the centre
57. Scenario 5
âą IF:
â« PPP-led coalition with current allies
â« PTI and JI partner for an alliance
â« PML-N led alliance with JUI and other anti-PPP
parties
âą THEN:
â« PPP and allies secure 38.1% of the votes
â« PTI and JI alliance secures 23.9%
â« PML-N led alliance secures 25.9%
58. What is expectedâŠ
âą Scenarios 3 and 4 unlikely
âą Elections unlikely to be dominated by a single
political party
âą PPP may have to continue with its current alliance
âą An emerging PTI
âą Likelihood of a strong opposition high
âą Electorate divided over âcrucialâ issues