SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 38
ICD Revision Overview




                Tevfik Bedirhan Üstün
  Classifications, Terminologies, Standards Team
              World Health Organization
Tokyo 2007 April  2013 February
    ICD - Revision Journey
               Thanks to:
               • WHOFIC Network
               • Japanese MHLW
               • Japan Hospital Association
                     Table 1: Major Japanese academic societies
               • Japanesesupporting Organizations
                            Medical ICD revision project
                  The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
                  The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology
                  The Japanese Respiratory Society
                  Japanese Society of Nephrology
                  The Japan Endocrine Society
                  Japan Diabetes Society
                  Japanese Society of Hematology
                  The Japanese Circulation Society
                  Japanese Society of Neurology
                  Japan College of Rhumatology
                  Japan Association for Medical Informatics
                  The Japanese Society of Medical Record Administra
IM TAG Brazil Poster
                     Conclusions - Request




• Japanese government and academic societies have heavily involved
  in the IM-TAG activities.

• As ICD is used in many countries with various ways it should be
  supported financially by WHO and a number of governments.

• Also, it is essential to provide concrete and logical leadership by WHO
  for conducting such a large international project effectively.
You can find the slides in…
Genealogy of ICD  1664
Age-adjusted death rates for
nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis:
            United States, 1968-2005
ICD-11 Revision Goals
1.       Evolve a multi-purpose and coherent classification
     –         Mortality, morbidity, primary care, clinical care, research, public
               health…
     –         Consistency & interoperability across different uses


2.       Serve as an international and multilingual reference standard
         for scientific comparability and communication purposes


3.       Ensure that ICD-11 will function in an electronic environment.
     •         ICD-11 will be a digital product
     •         Support electronic health records and information systems
           •      Link ICD logically to underpinning terminologies and ontologies (e.g. SNOMED, GO, …)
           •      ICD Categories “defined” by "logical operational rules" on their associations and details
ICD-11 Timeline

• 2012 : Beta version & Field Trials Version
  – +2 YR : Field trials




• 2015   : Final version for WHA Approval
  – 2015+ implementation
  – Continuous Annual Cycles
    • ICD 2015
    • ICD 2016
    • ICD 2017
How do we go
from Here to    21st Century?
• Open and Collaborative Platform

  – Web based

  – Like WIKIPEDIA
     • But
       – by the Content Model

    • with
       – by the TAGs , and scientific peers
ICD11 βeta
           •     http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/revision




               • Beta – Browser & Print
                   10 look & feel + descriptions – code structure !
βeta




                         • ICD-11 Beta draft is NOT FINAL
                         • updated on a daily basis
                         •NOT TO BE USED for CODING
                         except for agreed FIELD TRIALS
The ICD Foundation Component

           • is a collection of ALL
             ICD entities like
             diseases, disorders...
           • It represents the whole
             ICD universe.
           •   In a simple way, the foundation component is similar to a
               “store” of books or songs.
           •   From these elements we build a selection as a
               linearization.
           •   This analogy may however be misleading because there
               are many links between the ICD entities (like parent-child
               relations and other).

           •   The ICD entities in the Foundation Component:
                      • are not necessarily mutually exclusive
                      • allow multiple parenting ( i. e. an entity may be
                          in more than one branch, for example
                          tuberculosis meningitis is both an infection and
                          a brain disease)
The ICD Linearizations
   • A linearization is a subset of the
     foundation component, that is:
         • Fit for a particular purpose: reporting
           mortality, morbidity, or other uses
         • Jointly Exhaustive of ICD Universe (Foundation
           Component)
         • Composed of entities that are Mutually Exclusive
           of each other
         • Each entity is given a single parent
Primary Care
Foundation: ICD
categories with                             Linearizations
          - Definitions, synonyms
          - Clinical descriptions                              Morbidity
          - Diagnostic criteria
          - Causal mechanism
          - Functional Properties


                      Find Term                         Mortality




SNOMED-CT,
International Classification of
                                                                            23
Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)…
Linerization requirements

• Classical ICD
  – Mutually Exclusive
                                MEJE priniciple
  – Jointly Exhaustive

                         No double counting
                         All categories will be in

    Residuals:
       Other (*.8)
       Unspecified (*.9)
         should be generated for each linearization
Building Linearizations

• Multiple Parenting Allowed
  – Pneumonia
    • Lung Disease
    • Sometimes Infectious Disease
• Permanence of meaning across different
  linearizations
  – Telescopic principle
    • Zoom in – zoom out
Morbidity111

  Morbidity112


  Morbidity121


  Morbidity131

  Morbidity132

  Morbidity133

  Morbidity211


  Morbidity221


  Morbidity222




  Morbidity311


  Morbidity312


  Morbidity321




  Morbidity341

  Morbidity342


  Morbidity351



MORBIDITY
International
PC – Low 1




          PC – Low 2




          PC – Low 3




PRIMARY CARE Low Resource
(Verbal Autopsy ?)
Mort/PCHigh 11



          PC – Low 1                   Mort/PCHigh   12


                                       Mort/PCHigh   13




                                       Mort/PCHigh 21
          PC – Low 2

                                       Mort/PCHigh 22




                                       Mort/PCHigh   31
          PC – Low 3
                                       Mort/PCHigh 32



                                       Mort/PCHigh 33




                                       Mort/PCHigh 34



                                       Mort/PCHigh 35


PRIMARY CARE Low Resource   PRIMARY CARE High Resource
(Verbal Autopsy ?)          MORTALITY
Morbidity111
                                       Mort/PCHigh 11
                                                            Morbidity112


          PC – Low 1                   Mort/PCHigh   12     Morbidity121


                                                            Morbidity131
                                       Mort/PCHigh   13
                                                            Morbidity132

                                                            Morbidity133


                                       Mort/PCHigh 21       Morbidity211
          PC – Low 2
                                                            Morbidity221
                                       Mort/PCHigh 22
                                                            Morbidity222




                                                            Morbidity311
                                       Mort/PCHigh   31
          PC – Low 3                                        Morbidity312

                                       Mort/PCHigh 32
                                                            Morbidity321


                                       Mort/PCHigh 33


                                                            Morbidity341
                                       Mort/PCHigh 34
                                                            Morbidity342


                                       Mort/PCHigh 35       Morbidity351


PRIMARY CARE Low Resource   PRIMARY CARE High Resource    MORBIDITY
(Verbal Autopsy ?)          MORTALITY                     International
Morbidity111
                                       Mort/PCHigh 11
                                                            Morbidity112


          PC – Low 1                   Mort/PCHigh   12     Morbidity121


                                                            Morbidity131
                                       Mort/PCHigh   13
                                                            Morbidity132

                                                            Morbidity133


                                       Mort/PCHigh 21       Morbidity211
          PC – Low 2
                                                            Morbidity221
                                       Mort/PCHigh 22
                                                            Morbidity222




                                                            Morbidity311
                                       Mort/PCHigh   31
          PC – Low 3                                        Morbidity312

                                       Mort/PCHigh 32
                                                            Morbidity321


                                       Mort/PCHigh 33


                                                            Morbidity341
                                       Mort/PCHigh 34
                                                            Morbidity342


                                       Mort/PCHigh 35       Morbidity351


PRIMARY CARE Low Resource   PRIMARY CARE High Resource    MORBIDITY        Extensions
(Verbal Autopsy ?)          MORTALITY                     International    National Linearizations
                                                                           Specialty - Research
X – Chapter:
                            Extension Codes
            Type 1                           Type 2                   Type 3
Severity                           Main Condition (types)    History of
Temporality                        Reason for                Family History of
(course of the condition)          encounter/admission
Temporality                        Main Resource Condition   Screening/Evaluation
(Time in Life)
Etiology                           Present on Admission


Anatomic detail                    Provisional diagnosis
    Topology
    Specific Anatomic
    Location
Histopathology                     Diagnosis confirmed by
Biological Indicators              Rule out / Differential
Consciousness
External Causes         (detail)
Injury Specific        (detail)
Beta Phase
• Comments

• Proposals

• Review Mechanism

• Field Trials
Why a Review Process

• The review process will help WHO assure
  the quality of the Beta Content

• Review focus:
  – Scientific accuracy
  – Completeness of each unit
  – Internal consistency
  – Utility / Relevance of each unit
Review Process

• The review process :
  – the content
    • Definitions
    • Content model parameters
  – The structure - of the linearization (s)
    • Mortality
    • Morbidity
    • Primary Care
• The reviewers:
  – scientific peers
Initial Review
   • Initial Review of the current Beta draft:
        – Linearization Structure(s) (e.g. Mortality and Morbidity or Primary
          Care)
        – Content
   • Review Units: may include individual entities or groups of entities
     at any level, such as:
 Structure Review Units                          Content Review Units
    –   Entire Linearization                         –   Chapter
    –   Chapter                                      –   Subchapter
    –   Subchapter                                   –   Clusters
    –   Clusters                                     –   Individual entities
    –   Use Cases                                    –   Other groups of entities, as selected
    –   Other structure groupings, as selected
Reviewers
• Content Reviewers: Pool of specialist
  experts to review in their area of
  expertise, similar to quality assessment in
  peer-reviewed journals.
• Structure Reviewers: Morbidity TAG and
  Mortality TAG
• TAG and WG members :
  – will act as a scientific journal editorial board.
  – should NOT be nominated as reviewers.
Call for Reviewers
• WHO Requests all TAGs and WGs to provide
  nominations of reviewers for the next step in the Beta
  Phase.

•    Please send the following information to WHO
    (robinsonm@who.int) and copy the message to Bedirhan
    (ustunb@who.int) :
    –   Name of the nominee
    –   Email address
    –   Area(s) of expertise (content they are qualified to review)
    –   CV of the nominee (preferred)
    –   Linked-In or other professional profile link (if available)
Content Review – Schedule
1st Wave                               3rd Wave
    • GURM                                –   Musculoskeletal
    • TM (Disorders)                      –   Mental Health
    • Gastroenterology                    –   Neurology
                                          –   Rare Diseases
    • Nephrology
                                          –   Circulatory
    • Hepato-pancreatobiliary

                                       4th Wave
2nd   Wave
                                          –   Dermatology
      • External Causes and Injuries
                                          –   Hematology
      • Ophthalmology                     –   Respiratory
      • Dentistry                         –   Neoplasms
      • Rheumatology                      –   Infectious Diseases
      • Endocrinology                     –   Pediatrics
Transition Strategy


                     ICD-10                ICD-11
 ICD-9

75       79     90            13      15                                      ??


     4                 23




                                                    ICD - 2016


                                                                              ICD - 2018
                                                                                           ICD - 2019
                                                                 ICD - 2017
                               2015
Roadmap during Beta Phase
         • TAG serving as an
           Editorial Board
          • Reviews

          • Organizing Field testing
                • Feasibility
                • Quality assurance
                • Reliability
ICD11 βeta
A caterpillar,
This deep in fall-
  Still not a butterfly



        Basho

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

islamic medicine - power point
islamic medicine - power point islamic medicine - power point
islamic medicine - power point liyanazihah
 
Japanese encephalitis
Japanese encephalitis Japanese encephalitis
Japanese encephalitis Nikkin T
 
Febuxostat for treatment of chronic gout
Febuxostat for treatment of chronic goutFebuxostat for treatment of chronic gout
Febuxostat for treatment of chronic goutChoying Chen
 
Hyperuricemia and gout
Hyperuricemia and goutHyperuricemia and gout
Hyperuricemia and goutViquas Saim
 
Revisiting Gout: Guideline Updates PRA 2015
Revisiting Gout:  Guideline Updates PRA 2015Revisiting Gout:  Guideline Updates PRA 2015
Revisiting Gout: Guideline Updates PRA 2015Sidney Erwin Manahan
 
Muslim Contributions in Medicine-Geography-Astronomy
Muslim Contributions in Medicine-Geography-AstronomyMuslim Contributions in Medicine-Geography-Astronomy
Muslim Contributions in Medicine-Geography-AstronomyAli Usman
 
Gout cdm2 2014_class version(1)
Gout cdm2 2014_class version(1)Gout cdm2 2014_class version(1)
Gout cdm2 2014_class version(1)Natalie Burman
 
Muslim Contributions in Geography
Muslim Contributions in GeographyMuslim Contributions in Geography
Muslim Contributions in GeographyAli Usman
 
gout and anti gout drugs pharmacology
gout and anti gout drugs pharmacologygout and anti gout drugs pharmacology
gout and anti gout drugs pharmacologyKoppala RVS Chaitanya
 
BIOLOGICS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
BIOLOGICS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISBIOLOGICS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
BIOLOGICS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISDr. Sachin Kumar
 

Andere mochten auch (19)

Asymptomatic hyperuricemia: Treat or Not
Asymptomatic hyperuricemia: Treat or NotAsymptomatic hyperuricemia: Treat or Not
Asymptomatic hyperuricemia: Treat or Not
 
islamic medicine - power point
islamic medicine - power point islamic medicine - power point
islamic medicine - power point
 
Islamic Medicine
Islamic MedicineIslamic Medicine
Islamic Medicine
 
Japanese encephalitis
Japanese encephalitis Japanese encephalitis
Japanese encephalitis
 
Febuxostat for treatment of chronic gout
Febuxostat for treatment of chronic goutFebuxostat for treatment of chronic gout
Febuxostat for treatment of chronic gout
 
Updated hyperuricemia
Updated hyperuricemiaUpdated hyperuricemia
Updated hyperuricemia
 
Active and Latent TB in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases
Active and Latent TB in Patients with Rheumatic DiseasesActive and Latent TB in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases
Active and Latent TB in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases
 
Hyperuricemia and gout
Hyperuricemia and goutHyperuricemia and gout
Hyperuricemia and gout
 
Revisiting Gout: Guideline Updates PRA 2015
Revisiting Gout:  Guideline Updates PRA 2015Revisiting Gout:  Guideline Updates PRA 2015
Revisiting Gout: Guideline Updates PRA 2015
 
Muslim Contributions in Medicine-Geography-Astronomy
Muslim Contributions in Medicine-Geography-AstronomyMuslim Contributions in Medicine-Geography-Astronomy
Muslim Contributions in Medicine-Geography-Astronomy
 
Gout cdm2 2014_class version(1)
Gout cdm2 2014_class version(1)Gout cdm2 2014_class version(1)
Gout cdm2 2014_class version(1)
 
Hyperuricemia
HyperuricemiaHyperuricemia
Hyperuricemia
 
Muslim Contributions in Geography
Muslim Contributions in GeographyMuslim Contributions in Geography
Muslim Contributions in Geography
 
Gout updat
Gout updatGout updat
Gout updat
 
2014 GSS Updates on Gout
2014 GSS Updates on Gout2014 GSS Updates on Gout
2014 GSS Updates on Gout
 
gout and anti gout drugs pharmacology
gout and anti gout drugs pharmacologygout and anti gout drugs pharmacology
gout and anti gout drugs pharmacology
 
12.4 feudal powers in japan
12.4 feudal powers in japan12.4 feudal powers in japan
12.4 feudal powers in japan
 
BIOLOGICS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
BIOLOGICS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISBIOLOGICS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
BIOLOGICS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
 
Gout.
Gout.Gout.
Gout.
 

Mehr von Bedirhan Ustun

Doktor Kimliği: Biz Kimiz?
Doktor Kimliği: Biz Kimiz? Doktor Kimliği: Biz Kimiz?
Doktor Kimliği: Biz Kimiz? Bedirhan Ustun
 
Arastirmaci tarafindan Baslatilan Arastirmalarda larda ortak veri standartlar...
Arastirmaci tarafindan Baslatilan Arastirmalarda larda ortak veri standartlar...Arastirmaci tarafindan Baslatilan Arastirmalarda larda ortak veri standartlar...
Arastirmaci tarafindan Baslatilan Arastirmalarda larda ortak veri standartlar...Bedirhan Ustun
 
Hastane bilgi yonetimi sistemleri
Hastane bilgi yonetimi sistemleriHastane bilgi yonetimi sistemleri
Hastane bilgi yonetimi sistemleriBedirhan Ustun
 
Elektronik Sağlık Kayıtlarında Hasta Mahremiyeti ve Etik Sorunlar
Elektronik Sağlık Kayıtlarında Hasta Mahremiyeti ve  Etik SorunlarElektronik Sağlık Kayıtlarında Hasta Mahremiyeti ve  Etik Sorunlar
Elektronik Sağlık Kayıtlarında Hasta Mahremiyeti ve Etik SorunlarBedirhan Ustun
 
2017 Depression and Culture: Etic or Emic ? Can Memetics help?
2017 Depression and Culture:  Etic or Emic ? Can Memetics help?2017 Depression and Culture:  Etic or Emic ? Can Memetics help?
2017 Depression and Culture: Etic or Emic ? Can Memetics help?Bedirhan Ustun
 
Big Data: Impact on Global Health and Clinical Decision Making
Big Data: Impact on Global Health and Clinical Decision MakingBig Data: Impact on Global Health and Clinical Decision Making
Big Data: Impact on Global Health and Clinical Decision MakingBedirhan Ustun
 
Kisisel Saglik Verileri: Elektronik Saglik Kayitlarinda Guvenlik
Kisisel Saglik Verileri:  Elektronik Saglik Kayitlarinda GuvenlikKisisel Saglik Verileri:  Elektronik Saglik Kayitlarinda Guvenlik
Kisisel Saglik Verileri: Elektronik Saglik Kayitlarinda GuvenlikBedirhan Ustun
 
Ustun 2017 ethical legal issues in psychiatry
Ustun 2017 ethical legal issues in psychiatryUstun 2017 ethical legal issues in psychiatry
Ustun 2017 ethical legal issues in psychiatryBedirhan Ustun
 
Ustun 2017 doctor patient relationship
Ustun 2017 doctor patient relationshipUstun 2017 doctor patient relationship
Ustun 2017 doctor patient relationshipBedirhan Ustun
 
Personality and Personality Disorders: Medical Lecture on fundamentals
Personality and Personality Disorders: Medical Lecture on fundamentalsPersonality and Personality Disorders: Medical Lecture on fundamentals
Personality and Personality Disorders: Medical Lecture on fundamentalsBedirhan Ustun
 
ICF - Saglik YetiYitimi ve Islevselligin Siniflandirilmasi
ICF - Saglik YetiYitimi ve Islevselligin SiniflandirilmasiICF - Saglik YetiYitimi ve Islevselligin Siniflandirilmasi
ICF - Saglik YetiYitimi ve Islevselligin SiniflandirilmasiBedirhan Ustun
 
Babil Kulesinden Picasso'ya: Sağlık Bilişiminde birbirini anlamak
Babil Kulesinden Picasso'ya: Sağlık Bilişiminde birbirini anlamak Babil Kulesinden Picasso'ya: Sağlık Bilişiminde birbirini anlamak
Babil Kulesinden Picasso'ya: Sağlık Bilişiminde birbirini anlamak Bedirhan Ustun
 
Making health data work for Patients and Populations
Making health data work for Patients and PopulationsMaking health data work for Patients and Populations
Making health data work for Patients and PopulationsBedirhan Ustun
 
Çatışma ve Travma ne zaman yararlıdır ?: Psikiyatride travma sonrası ne yapab...
Çatışma ve Travma ne zaman yararlıdır ?: Psikiyatride travma sonrası ne yapab...Çatışma ve Travma ne zaman yararlıdır ?: Psikiyatride travma sonrası ne yapab...
Çatışma ve Travma ne zaman yararlıdır ?: Psikiyatride travma sonrası ne yapab...Bedirhan Ustun
 
Zihin Beden Dichotomy
Zihin Beden Dichotomy Zihin Beden Dichotomy
Zihin Beden Dichotomy Bedirhan Ustun
 
State of the WHO Family of International Classifications -2015
State of the WHO Family of International Classifications -2015State of the WHO Family of International Classifications -2015
State of the WHO Family of International Classifications -2015Bedirhan Ustun
 
ICD Revision: Current Status Internal Medicine workgroup
ICD Revision: Current Status  Internal Medicine workgroupICD Revision: Current Status  Internal Medicine workgroup
ICD Revision: Current Status Internal Medicine workgroupBedirhan Ustun
 
ICD Revision and Primary Care Versions
ICD Revision and Primary Care VersionsICD Revision and Primary Care Versions
ICD Revision and Primary Care VersionsBedirhan Ustun
 

Mehr von Bedirhan Ustun (20)

Doktor Kimliği: Biz Kimiz?
Doktor Kimliği: Biz Kimiz? Doktor Kimliği: Biz Kimiz?
Doktor Kimliği: Biz Kimiz?
 
Arastirmaci tarafindan Baslatilan Arastirmalarda larda ortak veri standartlar...
Arastirmaci tarafindan Baslatilan Arastirmalarda larda ortak veri standartlar...Arastirmaci tarafindan Baslatilan Arastirmalarda larda ortak veri standartlar...
Arastirmaci tarafindan Baslatilan Arastirmalarda larda ortak veri standartlar...
 
Hastane bilgi yonetimi sistemleri
Hastane bilgi yonetimi sistemleriHastane bilgi yonetimi sistemleri
Hastane bilgi yonetimi sistemleri
 
Elektronik Sağlık Kayıtlarında Hasta Mahremiyeti ve Etik Sorunlar
Elektronik Sağlık Kayıtlarında Hasta Mahremiyeti ve  Etik SorunlarElektronik Sağlık Kayıtlarında Hasta Mahremiyeti ve  Etik Sorunlar
Elektronik Sağlık Kayıtlarında Hasta Mahremiyeti ve Etik Sorunlar
 
2017 Depression and Culture: Etic or Emic ? Can Memetics help?
2017 Depression and Culture:  Etic or Emic ? Can Memetics help?2017 Depression and Culture:  Etic or Emic ? Can Memetics help?
2017 Depression and Culture: Etic or Emic ? Can Memetics help?
 
Big Data: Impact on Global Health and Clinical Decision Making
Big Data: Impact on Global Health and Clinical Decision MakingBig Data: Impact on Global Health and Clinical Decision Making
Big Data: Impact on Global Health and Clinical Decision Making
 
Kisisel Saglik Verileri: Elektronik Saglik Kayitlarinda Guvenlik
Kisisel Saglik Verileri:  Elektronik Saglik Kayitlarinda GuvenlikKisisel Saglik Verileri:  Elektronik Saglik Kayitlarinda Guvenlik
Kisisel Saglik Verileri: Elektronik Saglik Kayitlarinda Guvenlik
 
Ustun 2017 ethical legal issues in psychiatry
Ustun 2017 ethical legal issues in psychiatryUstun 2017 ethical legal issues in psychiatry
Ustun 2017 ethical legal issues in psychiatry
 
Ustun 2017 doctor patient relationship
Ustun 2017 doctor patient relationshipUstun 2017 doctor patient relationship
Ustun 2017 doctor patient relationship
 
Personality and Personality Disorders: Medical Lecture on fundamentals
Personality and Personality Disorders: Medical Lecture on fundamentalsPersonality and Personality Disorders: Medical Lecture on fundamentals
Personality and Personality Disorders: Medical Lecture on fundamentals
 
ICF - Saglik YetiYitimi ve Islevselligin Siniflandirilmasi
ICF - Saglik YetiYitimi ve Islevselligin SiniflandirilmasiICF - Saglik YetiYitimi ve Islevselligin Siniflandirilmasi
ICF - Saglik YetiYitimi ve Islevselligin Siniflandirilmasi
 
Babil Kulesinden Picasso'ya: Sağlık Bilişiminde birbirini anlamak
Babil Kulesinden Picasso'ya: Sağlık Bilişiminde birbirini anlamak Babil Kulesinden Picasso'ya: Sağlık Bilişiminde birbirini anlamak
Babil Kulesinden Picasso'ya: Sağlık Bilişiminde birbirini anlamak
 
Making health data work for Patients and Populations
Making health data work for Patients and PopulationsMaking health data work for Patients and Populations
Making health data work for Patients and Populations
 
Çatışma ve Travma ne zaman yararlıdır ?: Psikiyatride travma sonrası ne yapab...
Çatışma ve Travma ne zaman yararlıdır ?: Psikiyatride travma sonrası ne yapab...Çatışma ve Travma ne zaman yararlıdır ?: Psikiyatride travma sonrası ne yapab...
Çatışma ve Travma ne zaman yararlıdır ?: Psikiyatride travma sonrası ne yapab...
 
Zihin Beden Dichotomy
Zihin Beden Dichotomy Zihin Beden Dichotomy
Zihin Beden Dichotomy
 
Bogazici ICF 2015
Bogazici ICF 2015Bogazici ICF 2015
Bogazici ICF 2015
 
State of the WHO Family of International Classifications -2015
State of the WHO Family of International Classifications -2015State of the WHO Family of International Classifications -2015
State of the WHO Family of International Classifications -2015
 
ICD11 & DRGs
ICD11 & DRGs ICD11 & DRGs
ICD11 & DRGs
 
ICD Revision: Current Status Internal Medicine workgroup
ICD Revision: Current Status  Internal Medicine workgroupICD Revision: Current Status  Internal Medicine workgroup
ICD Revision: Current Status Internal Medicine workgroup
 
ICD Revision and Primary Care Versions
ICD Revision and Primary Care VersionsICD Revision and Primary Care Versions
ICD Revision and Primary Care Versions
 

ICD Revision Beta 2013 - Internal Medicine

  • 1. ICD Revision Overview Tevfik Bedirhan Üstün Classifications, Terminologies, Standards Team World Health Organization
  • 2. Tokyo 2007 April  2013 February ICD - Revision Journey Thanks to: • WHOFIC Network • Japanese MHLW • Japan Hospital Association Table 1: Major Japanese academic societies • Japanesesupporting Organizations Medical ICD revision project The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology The Japanese Respiratory Society Japanese Society of Nephrology The Japan Endocrine Society Japan Diabetes Society Japanese Society of Hematology The Japanese Circulation Society Japanese Society of Neurology Japan College of Rhumatology Japan Association for Medical Informatics The Japanese Society of Medical Record Administra
  • 3. IM TAG Brazil Poster Conclusions - Request • Japanese government and academic societies have heavily involved in the IM-TAG activities. • As ICD is used in many countries with various ways it should be supported financially by WHO and a number of governments. • Also, it is essential to provide concrete and logical leadership by WHO for conducting such a large international project effectively.
  • 4. You can find the slides in…
  • 5.
  • 6. Genealogy of ICD  1664
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9. Age-adjusted death rates for nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: United States, 1968-2005
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13. ICD-11 Revision Goals 1. Evolve a multi-purpose and coherent classification – Mortality, morbidity, primary care, clinical care, research, public health… – Consistency & interoperability across different uses 2. Serve as an international and multilingual reference standard for scientific comparability and communication purposes 3. Ensure that ICD-11 will function in an electronic environment. • ICD-11 will be a digital product • Support electronic health records and information systems • Link ICD logically to underpinning terminologies and ontologies (e.g. SNOMED, GO, …) • ICD Categories “defined” by "logical operational rules" on their associations and details
  • 14. ICD-11 Timeline • 2012 : Beta version & Field Trials Version – +2 YR : Field trials • 2015 : Final version for WHA Approval – 2015+ implementation – Continuous Annual Cycles • ICD 2015 • ICD 2016 • ICD 2017
  • 15. How do we go from Here to 21st Century?
  • 16. • Open and Collaborative Platform – Web based – Like WIKIPEDIA • But – by the Content Model • with – by the TAGs , and scientific peers
  • 17. ICD11 βeta • http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/revision • Beta – Browser & Print 10 look & feel + descriptions – code structure ! βeta • ICD-11 Beta draft is NOT FINAL • updated on a daily basis •NOT TO BE USED for CODING except for agreed FIELD TRIALS
  • 18. The ICD Foundation Component • is a collection of ALL ICD entities like diseases, disorders... • It represents the whole ICD universe. • In a simple way, the foundation component is similar to a “store” of books or songs. • From these elements we build a selection as a linearization. • This analogy may however be misleading because there are many links between the ICD entities (like parent-child relations and other). • The ICD entities in the Foundation Component: • are not necessarily mutually exclusive • allow multiple parenting ( i. e. an entity may be in more than one branch, for example tuberculosis meningitis is both an infection and a brain disease)
  • 19. The ICD Linearizations • A linearization is a subset of the foundation component, that is: • Fit for a particular purpose: reporting mortality, morbidity, or other uses • Jointly Exhaustive of ICD Universe (Foundation Component) • Composed of entities that are Mutually Exclusive of each other • Each entity is given a single parent
  • 20. Primary Care Foundation: ICD categories with Linearizations - Definitions, synonyms - Clinical descriptions Morbidity - Diagnostic criteria - Causal mechanism - Functional Properties Find Term Mortality SNOMED-CT, International Classification of 23 Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)…
  • 21. Linerization requirements • Classical ICD – Mutually Exclusive MEJE priniciple – Jointly Exhaustive No double counting All categories will be in Residuals: Other (*.8) Unspecified (*.9) should be generated for each linearization
  • 22. Building Linearizations • Multiple Parenting Allowed – Pneumonia • Lung Disease • Sometimes Infectious Disease • Permanence of meaning across different linearizations – Telescopic principle • Zoom in – zoom out
  • 23. Morbidity111 Morbidity112 Morbidity121 Morbidity131 Morbidity132 Morbidity133 Morbidity211 Morbidity221 Morbidity222 Morbidity311 Morbidity312 Morbidity321 Morbidity341 Morbidity342 Morbidity351 MORBIDITY International
  • 24. PC – Low 1 PC – Low 2 PC – Low 3 PRIMARY CARE Low Resource (Verbal Autopsy ?)
  • 25. Mort/PCHigh 11 PC – Low 1 Mort/PCHigh 12 Mort/PCHigh 13 Mort/PCHigh 21 PC – Low 2 Mort/PCHigh 22 Mort/PCHigh 31 PC – Low 3 Mort/PCHigh 32 Mort/PCHigh 33 Mort/PCHigh 34 Mort/PCHigh 35 PRIMARY CARE Low Resource PRIMARY CARE High Resource (Verbal Autopsy ?) MORTALITY
  • 26. Morbidity111 Mort/PCHigh 11 Morbidity112 PC – Low 1 Mort/PCHigh 12 Morbidity121 Morbidity131 Mort/PCHigh 13 Morbidity132 Morbidity133 Mort/PCHigh 21 Morbidity211 PC – Low 2 Morbidity221 Mort/PCHigh 22 Morbidity222 Morbidity311 Mort/PCHigh 31 PC – Low 3 Morbidity312 Mort/PCHigh 32 Morbidity321 Mort/PCHigh 33 Morbidity341 Mort/PCHigh 34 Morbidity342 Mort/PCHigh 35 Morbidity351 PRIMARY CARE Low Resource PRIMARY CARE High Resource MORBIDITY (Verbal Autopsy ?) MORTALITY International
  • 27. Morbidity111 Mort/PCHigh 11 Morbidity112 PC – Low 1 Mort/PCHigh 12 Morbidity121 Morbidity131 Mort/PCHigh 13 Morbidity132 Morbidity133 Mort/PCHigh 21 Morbidity211 PC – Low 2 Morbidity221 Mort/PCHigh 22 Morbidity222 Morbidity311 Mort/PCHigh 31 PC – Low 3 Morbidity312 Mort/PCHigh 32 Morbidity321 Mort/PCHigh 33 Morbidity341 Mort/PCHigh 34 Morbidity342 Mort/PCHigh 35 Morbidity351 PRIMARY CARE Low Resource PRIMARY CARE High Resource MORBIDITY Extensions (Verbal Autopsy ?) MORTALITY International National Linearizations Specialty - Research
  • 28. X – Chapter: Extension Codes Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Severity Main Condition (types) History of Temporality Reason for Family History of (course of the condition) encounter/admission Temporality Main Resource Condition Screening/Evaluation (Time in Life) Etiology Present on Admission Anatomic detail Provisional diagnosis Topology Specific Anatomic Location Histopathology Diagnosis confirmed by Biological Indicators Rule out / Differential Consciousness External Causes (detail) Injury Specific (detail)
  • 29. Beta Phase • Comments • Proposals • Review Mechanism • Field Trials
  • 30. Why a Review Process • The review process will help WHO assure the quality of the Beta Content • Review focus: – Scientific accuracy – Completeness of each unit – Internal consistency – Utility / Relevance of each unit
  • 31. Review Process • The review process : – the content • Definitions • Content model parameters – The structure - of the linearization (s) • Mortality • Morbidity • Primary Care • The reviewers: – scientific peers
  • 32. Initial Review • Initial Review of the current Beta draft: – Linearization Structure(s) (e.g. Mortality and Morbidity or Primary Care) – Content • Review Units: may include individual entities or groups of entities at any level, such as:  Structure Review Units  Content Review Units – Entire Linearization – Chapter – Chapter – Subchapter – Subchapter – Clusters – Clusters – Individual entities – Use Cases – Other groups of entities, as selected – Other structure groupings, as selected
  • 33. Reviewers • Content Reviewers: Pool of specialist experts to review in their area of expertise, similar to quality assessment in peer-reviewed journals. • Structure Reviewers: Morbidity TAG and Mortality TAG • TAG and WG members : – will act as a scientific journal editorial board. – should NOT be nominated as reviewers.
  • 34. Call for Reviewers • WHO Requests all TAGs and WGs to provide nominations of reviewers for the next step in the Beta Phase. • Please send the following information to WHO (robinsonm@who.int) and copy the message to Bedirhan (ustunb@who.int) : – Name of the nominee – Email address – Area(s) of expertise (content they are qualified to review) – CV of the nominee (preferred) – Linked-In or other professional profile link (if available)
  • 35. Content Review – Schedule 1st Wave 3rd Wave • GURM – Musculoskeletal • TM (Disorders) – Mental Health • Gastroenterology – Neurology – Rare Diseases • Nephrology – Circulatory • Hepato-pancreatobiliary 4th Wave 2nd Wave – Dermatology • External Causes and Injuries – Hematology • Ophthalmology – Respiratory • Dentistry – Neoplasms • Rheumatology – Infectious Diseases • Endocrinology – Pediatrics
  • 36. Transition Strategy ICD-10 ICD-11 ICD-9 75 79 90 13 15 ?? 4 23 ICD - 2016 ICD - 2018 ICD - 2019 ICD - 2017 2015
  • 37. Roadmap during Beta Phase • TAG serving as an Editorial Board • Reviews • Organizing Field testing • Feasibility • Quality assurance • Reliability
  • 38. ICD11 βeta A caterpillar, This deep in fall- Still not a butterfly Basho

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Dr. Kenji Fujiwara passed away at age 74, on November 4, 2012. Dr. Fujiwara was clearly one of the originators of the development of ICD-11 in Japan and a great leader who contributed significantly to the development of ICD not only in Japa...n but also within WHO.For those of us involved in the revision of ICD, we can overcome his loss by successfully completing the 11th revision of ICD. We will carry on his aspirations and fulfill our responsibility to the world by further improving on ICD through its 11th revision. May Dr. Kenji Fujiwara rest in peace
  2.  
  3. The linearization is similar tothe classical print version of ICD Tabular Lists (e.g. volume I of ICD-10 or other previous editions).  Various linearizations could be built at different granularity, use case or other purposes such as for Primary Care, Clinical Care or Research.  The linkage from the foundation component to a particular linearization will ensure consistent use of the ICD. The ICD Entities are represented in a content model which has 13 predefined parameters. The information filled in by ICD authors is visible in the alpha browser.
  4. There is currently great diversity in the level of work completed in the Beta draft