This project was carried by Eastern regional office of National federation of the disabled Nepal from 2010 to 2015 by the financial support of Netherlands leprosy relief and presented by regional coordinator Mr. Uttam siwakoti on project evaluation team of Nepal social welfare council
College & House wife Call Girls in Paharganj 9634446618 -Best Escort call gi...
Community rehabiliation project in Nepal
1. Short outcome Reflection
of
MSCBR /Rehabilitation Project
2010 to 2015
Uttam siwakoti
Regional coordinator
National federation of the disabled Nepal Eastern region
usiwakoti@gmail.com
6. Understand
Mass orientation
Local stakeholder orientation
Family orientation
leprosy and disability orientation
Importance of DPOs .
Multi stakeholder meetings
7. Organized
All types of PWDs affiliation
DPOs form by mass decision
Monthly meeting
Focal point established
membership system established
Capacity building training
leadership development
8. Intervention
Data gathering and recording
Advocacy and lobby for local resource
mobilization .
Actively participation in local planning
process .
Sensitization for ID card .
Access on GOs scholarship
Advocacy for social participation
11. • DPOs are leprosy sensitive in region to keep mainstreaming
process .
• Localization the skill and capacity of disability management .
• Institutional governance indicators are improving after the
assessment/action plan/follow up ( 10 district level and 60
VDCs level )
• Livelihood support works as magnet of local resources /
banking transaction/revolving fund
• Enhanced capacity of regionally 30 members on CRPD
monitoring in local level .
• Increased social participation after enhanced the capacity of
leadership .
• Media advocacy against the social injustice . (radio program, TV
report and publication )
• Changing behavior of police implementers and human rights
activist .
13. Compare with after and before
Before After
For movement Off movement
Urban based advocacy Rural based advocacy
Inactive 10 DPOs/ 150 members/No PLD 60 DPOs/5500 G.member affiliation/300
active/85 PLD
Stakeholders are unknown Stakeholders are supportive
Ratio of ID card yearly 500 Ratio of ID card yearly more than 1500
(1700 directly support)
Networking functioning at district level Networking cover the 90 percent of local
rural area .
Lacking of primary data Roughly data collected by DPOs (80
VDCs Morang and Jhapa)
No any sign of social participation 340 PWDs are affiliated in local
committees (women group, different
political party, ward citizen forum, child
club, VDC planning committee ,SMC and
other CBOs )
14. Compare with after and before
Before After
Utilization of local resource only in
finger count
Percentage of utilization is 100
( 10 to 150 thousand )
PWLD are Isolate from the
community and general disability
groups
Son and father relation between the
ECG and local DPOs
Less opportunity of leadership
development
Opportunity of whole community
leading
Special school concept Inclusive school concept
Highly demand of proposal writing Capacity of resource mobilization has
increased . Within the training 12
proposal completed .
Access of Disability allowance is
limited
Disability allowances has increased
by nearly 150 yearly ( 550 PWDs got
pension during this year )
Scholarship demand only 800 yearly Scholarship demand 1500 yearly
16. Way forward
• Focus on women empowerment program
• Focus area focus program (Module village)
• Mainstreaming activities for CWDs .
• Institutional support to partner should increased .
• Establishment of regional information center .
• Startup support for economic empowerment .
• Media advocacy for polices implementation .
• Access monitoring and CRPD monitoring .
• Promotion of ILFE (Module school)
• District level resource/budget audit
• Social enjoyment for PWLD and without PWLD