The document summarizes the University of Missouri's President's Accountability Measures report for 2009. It outlines nine strategic goals and details how the university achieved $98.3 million in efficiencies through cost management, avoidance, and revenue enhancement. It also describes the process used to develop accountability measures aligned with strategic themes of teaching and learning, economic development, research, community engagement, and resource management. Key components of the report include historical data, benchmarks, peer comparisons, and campus targets.

1. Resources & Planning Committee President’s Accountability Measures August 20, 2009 1

2. Strategic Directions A roadmap for strengthening and enhancing teaching and learning research and discovery service and engagement economic development the administrative functions that support these strategic themes Nine goals with detailed enabling strategies Aligned with campus strategic plans Report on campus and system office actions during 2009 2

3. Efficiency & Effectiveness Report FY 2009 Commitment to responsible stewardship of University assets and resources Cost management $ 37.6 million Cost avoidance $ 26.6 Revenue enhancement $ 27.0 Strategic reallocation $ 7.1 Total Impact $ 98.3 million +Build America Bonds 40.0 million +Benefit changes 12.0 million 3

4. University of Missouri Efficiency Measures FY2001-2009 Funding/FTE Student FTE Enrollment 11% Efficiency 4

5. President’s Accountability Measures Background President’s initiative to promote transparency and accountability regarding the University’s overall performance “A Strategic Direction for the University System” outlined first draft of the measures (October 2008) 5

6. President’s Accountability Measures Measures Aligned with Strategic Directions Five Themes Teaching & Learning Economic Development Research & Discovery Community Service & Engagement Developing & Managing Human, Financial & Physical Resources 6

7. President’s Accountability Measures Principles of Identifying Measures Most meaningful measures under each theme Common data sources & definitions across campuses Externally-validated sources Comparator peer data availability Include measures from CBHE Coordinated Plan and from the Voluntary System of Accountability 7

8. President’s Accountability Measures Process of Developing Measures Task Force began in August 2008 Four campuses and UM System represented UM System IR maintained the official report template Report template & core measures finished March 2009 Historical data, benchmarks, & comparator peer averages populated April 2009 & revised July/August 2009 Campuses given option to add campus-specific measures Campus targets in August 2009 8

9. President’s Accountability Measures Components of Notebook Guide to the President’s Accountability Measures Campus reports: historical data, benchmarks, comparator peer averages, targets, indicators, source Campus comparator peer groups Operational definitions and complete data sources 9

10. President’s Accountability Measures Components of the Report Three years of historical data Indicator: green, yellow, red Campus three-year target Benchmark (best in class) Comparator peer average Source Voluntary System of Accountability or Coordinated Plan component Data definition/notes 10

11. President’s Accountability Measures Next Step: Outside “audit” of measures Validity and reasonableness of measures, targets, benchmarks and peer comparisons Annual Process In collaboration with the campuses, UM System IR responsible for maintaining & updating report Annual update shared with Board of Curators at December meeting Considered dynamic document 11