Planning for Emergency Mass-Depopulation of Swine in Response to a Foreign Animal Disease Outbreak - Mark Rice, North Carolina State University, from the 2015 World Pork Expo, June 3 - 5, 2015, Des Moines, IA, USA.
More presentations at http://www.swinecast.com/2015-world-pork-expo
đSONAM KUMARđPremium Call Girls Jaipur âď¸9257276172 âď¸One Night Stand With Lo...
Â
Mark Rice - Planning for Emergency Mass-Depopulation of Swine in Response to a Foreign Animal Disease Outbreak
1. 1
Planning for an emergency
depopulation of swine in response
to a foreign animal disease outbreak
⢠WE Morgan Morrow, RE Meyer, JT Whitley, CS Whisnant,
⢠LF Stikeleather, CL Baird, JM Rice, BV Halbert, HS Byrne, JA
Lavin, D Cornejo, DK Styles
⢠Mississippi State University
⢠North Carolina State University
⢠USDA-APHIS Veterinary Services
⢠Department of Homeland Security
⢠Murphy Brown LLC
3. I am not here to convince you that I
have all the answers but rather to get
you to:
â˘Start thinking now about what you would
do if the situation arises
â˘Be prepared
â˘Every situation is different
3
4. What is Mass Depopulation?
As defined by the AVMA:
âmethods by which large numbers of animals must
be destroyed quickly and efficiently with as much
consideration given to the welfare of the animals
as practicable, but where the circumstances and
tasks facing those doing the depopulation are
understood to be extenuatingâ
⢠Includes: disease outbreaks, contamination with
chemicals (eg, dioxin) or radionuclides (eg, cesium 137),
and situations severely limiting feed deliveries and animal
movement.
5. Why CO2?
⢠Readily available, low cost, nonflammable
⢠Anesthesia due to âpH
⢠Produces unconsciousness and kills over wide range of concentrations
⢠Exposure to 60% to 90% CO2 causes unconsciousness
in 14 to 30 seconds, with unconsciousness occurring
prior to onset of signs of excitation.
⢠Conc < 30% not aversive to pigs (Raj & Gregory 1995)
⢠AVMA- , AASV-approved for humane killing of swine
⢠Reversible should personnel be exposed
6. Our Objectives
Recognized the benefit of getting the pigs out of the
buildings
Easier to manage their disposal once outside
⢠Figure out how to do mass-depop in the field
⢠Focused on gassing
⢠Develop alternatives for:
⢠ContainmentâŚ.corrals
⢠low pressure CO2 (head space vs liquid)
⢠Gas containmentâŚ.bladders
7. Our Objectives (cont.)
⢠Understand CO2/O2 dynamics in the
containers.
⢠Computer simulations/CFD analyses.
⢠How to deliver CO2, manifolds.
⢠Temperature, avoid freezing pigs
(evaporators/earth tubes).
⢠Time to 30% CO2 (non aversive).
8. Our Objectives (cont.)
⢠Time to loss of righting reflex (LORR)
unconsciousness.
⢠Time to deathâŚ.cycle time is very important.
⢠Simulate cycles to better understand effects of
limiting inputs (labor, gas, containers, pig
movement).
⢠Generally to better understand the process and
develop alternatives.
The devilâs in the details!
9. IdeallyâŚ
â˘Equipment and supplies readily available
(Home Depot/Lowes) or stockpiled
ahead of time
â˘Well-documented methods
⢠Easy to apply by field personnel
â˘Scale-able to large numbers/throughput
⢠Efficiency benchmarked by time-motion
studies
â˘As humane as possible under the
circumstances
11. When using CO2 for euthanizing
animals - size/scale does matter
â˘CO2 is generally delivered as a pressurized
liquid
â˘For low flow rates â draw off head space
gas
â˘For high flow rates â will require releasing
high pressure liquid â when liquid CO2 is
released approximately 54% is released as
a gas, the remaining (46%) forms dry ice
To meet AVMA recommendations â must replace chamber volume
within 5-minutes
12. Small scale - bleed directly from
CO2 pressurized cylinder into
chamber
For: nursery pigs and small chambers such as
hand carts or bins
13. Intermediate scale â bleed from a
high pressure CO2 cylinder to low
pressure tank
⢠Suitable for small trucks or dump trailers
⢠Liquid CO2 flow rate is low enough to avoid
line and regulator freeze up
⢠At low flow rate, CO2 gas in the low pressure
tank will approach ambient temperature
⢠Orifice is sized to control flow from the low
pressure tank to chamber
14. Low pressure CO2
tank
High pressure CO2 cylinder
Euthanasia Chamber
(Trailer)
CO2 pressure
regulator 1
1 Regulator would maintain preset pressure in the
low pressure tank between application events.
2 Relief pressure setting should be slightly above
required low pressure CO2 tank pressure but well
below the maximum tank pressure rating.
Safety
pressure
relief valve2
Orifice plate
Ball valve
15.
16.
17. What if you need to go Large Scale? â
dumpsters, trucks, or larger
chambers or pits
18.
19.
20.
21. Turnkey vaporizer for large scale use
of CO2
$$$$ - $120,000 + trailer?
60 Kw generator - $25,000 +
22. Low-cost vaporizer system to capture and
sublimate dry ice produced during the
application of liquid CO2 and also temper gas
temperature
< $2,500 including heaters
3.5 kw generator â approximately $500
28. Vaporizer Chamber â should be a gas tight
vessel capable of withstanding 500-600 degree
Fahrenheit and with a pressure relief valve
installed to prevent pressure buildup. We have
utilized 55-gallon metal drums as well as 250
and 500 gallon, used propane tanks
29. Heat Enclosure â designed to improve heat transfer to
the vaporizer chamber. It should be exhausted to
prevent excess backpressure on the heaters.
Concrete block can
be stacked without
mortar to create an
enclosure around
the vaporizer tank
30. The liquid CO2 connection is critical. Check with
your CO2 supplier to make sure you have the
correct connects available to enable their trucks
to connect to your system. A pressure drop valve
is necessary near the inlet of the tank to prevent
dry ice formation in the feed hose or truck valve.
Liquid CO2
connection
to truck
Needle valve
used to drop
the liquid CO2
pressure
31. Heat Exchanger â to prevent cold CO2 gas from being
introduced into the chamber the CO2 gas temperature sho
be increased to near ambient temperature. This can be
accomplished by adding a metal heat exchanger coil inside
the heat enclosure.
32. CO2 gas to
heat
exchanger
CO2 gas
by-pass
valve
valve
Valves can be adjusted to regulate the flow of CO2 gas
through the heat exchanger to provide the appropriate
CO2 gas temperature to the chamber.
Heat Exchanger Plumbing Diagram
33. CO2 Gas Accumulation (optional) â a gas
collect/temporary storage bladder will help provide a
more consistent flow of gas to the depopulation
chamber. Bladders can be constructed with plastic
sheeting by taping the seams or Ag Bag silage storage
bags by folding/clamping the ends.
34. Flow Regulation â To meet the AVMA requirement the
depopulation chamber volume must be filled over a 5-
minute period. A blower can be used to move the CO2
gas from the accumulation bag to the chamber. To
ensure proper flow rates, a field constructed venturi
and monometer can be assembled.
35. Venturi with common parts
Two 6âx4â PVC reducers with standard
PVC pipe sectionsâŚ.
37. Flowrate of CO2 (0-60°F) as function
of Inches of water differential
pressure
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
100 200 300 400 500 600
InH2O
Cubic feet per min. (CFM) of CO2 when at 0 -60°F
Inches H2O vs. CO2 Flowrate @ 0-60°F with 6x4 PVC venturi
CFM of CO2 at 0F
CFM of CO2 at 60F
38. Depopulation Chamber â Sized to accommodate the
farm needs and the capabilities of the vaporizer unit.
Deliver CO2 to the floor of the chamber. Since CO2 is
heavier than air the lower part of the chamber must gas
tight. Earthen pits or sealed truck bodies could be
utilized as chambers.
39. The heat capacity and number of heaters will be
determined by the desired CO2 flow rate. Each
cubic foot of chamber capacity will require about
600 btu/hr heat capacity. Heat input can be
supplied from several sources but kerosene,
torpedo style heaters are readily available and
provide more consistent output than propane
fueled heaters.
Kerosene heaters
positioned into
openings in block
walls
40. Planning for Mass Depopulation
1) Decide on chamber size, i.e. trucks, corral, pit.
2) Determine volume of chamber (length x width x depth)
3) Determine required flow rate (volume/5 minutes)
4) Size components according to required flow rate. To
prevent dry ice accumulation and raise the temperature of
the CO2 gas to near ambient temperature, for each cubic
foot of chamber capacity will require approximately 600
btu/hour of heat capacity
41. Planning for Mass Depopulation
Example:
1) Decide to use a pit that is 10â wide, 40â long, and 3â deep
2) Determine the volume: 10â x 40â x 3â = 1,200 cu. ft.
3) Determine required CO2 gas flow rate: To fill the chamber
volume in 5 minutes: 1,200 cu.ft./5 min. = 240 cu. ft./min.
4) Heat requirement: 1,200 cubic feet chamber capacity x 600
btu/hr capacity = 720,000 btu/hour (If 125,000 btu/hr
heaters are available, it would require 6 of them.
42. Jobs, Innovation, Growth, Stability www.ies.ncsu.edu
Planning Tools for Mass Depop
Events
David Cornejo
Ph.D. Candidate in Operations Research
43. Goals
â˘Strategic(Before)
⢠Develop basic estimates of resource
requirements before disaster.
â˘Tactical(During)
⢠Assist in identifying resource savings/need
during event.
â˘Delivery via Web application
43
44. System Overview
â˘4 Distinct Stages
⢠Moving pigs from house to loading chute
⢠Loading pigs onto available trucks
⢠Preparing trucks and gas application
⢠Disposal of carcasses
â˘METRIC: Time to complete process.
44
45. Moving Pigs from house to truck
⢠Influenced by following user inputs
⢠Pigs: Number, Weight class
⢠Houses: Number, Size, Loading chute length
⢠Workers: Number available
⢠Variables affect Travel Time of run.
45
46. Load Truck
⢠Pigs Loaded onto truck
⢠Capacity of trucks from pig weight class
⢠Details
⢠One or more loading chutes available
46
Class Name Space Requirement(sq. ft./pig)
Nursing (<50lbs) 1.09
Weaning (50-100lbs) 2.635
Finishing (100+lbs) 3.48
Breeding Boar/Sows 5.55
47. Preparing Trucks for Gas
â˘Before each application of gas some
preparation (check tarp, attach hose etc.)
â˘Assumed to take between 5 and 10 mins
⢠May physically take place at gas location.
47
48. Administer Gas
â˘Correct Flow rate(20-30% of volume of
container/min) applied for minimum of 5
minutes.
â˘Applying gas consumes available stock.
⢠Process halted when no more gas
⢠Gas can be delivered on intervals.
⢠Sublimation a way to extend gas stock
48
49. Dispose of Carcasses
â˘âDwell Timeâ of 10 minutes accounted
for in minimum travel time to Disposal
Site.
⢠Ability to travel immediately after gas
â˘Trucks take time to return to loading
chute
49
52. Parameters and Control Variables
⢠Farm Parameters
⢠Size of House
⢠Size of Pin
⢠Number/Length of Load Chutes
⢠Truck Controls
⢠Truck Size
⢠Number of Trucks
⢠Handler Controls
⢠Number of Handler
⢠Handler Efficiency
⢠Special Process Parameters
⢠Dry Ice recovery process option
52
54. Web App Solution
⢠Best resource solution form a large array of
scenarios batch run in simulation model.
⢠Results stored in database.
⢠Web application exposes relevant controls to
decision maker and calculates resource
requirements based on stored simulation
results.
⢠Web app runs fast (seconds) and requires no
specialized software.
54
59. Summary
⢠CO2 is a viable option
⢠Able to meet AVMA recommendations for
dump truck size chambers as well as
3âx12âx80â pit using a storage bag to
accumulate CO2
⢠Progressively refining the process â working
through the obstacles
⢠Needed supplies can be purchased locally
⢠Minimal number of people involved
⢠Safe method
60. The information and tools will be
available online in the near future.
If you have questions; please contact me.
Mark Rice
Email: mark_rice@ncsu.edu
Phone: 919-515-6794
60
Hinweis der Redaktion
Australia probably needs a similar recognition of the need
The term animal health emergency, as used in this context, includes a wide range of potential situations such as disease outbreaks, contamination with chemicals (eg, dioxin) or radionuclides (eg, cesium 137), and adverse animal welfare conditions created by transportation restrictions that severely limit feed deliveries and animal movement.
Depopulation is especially problematic from a welfare standpoint due to several factors, including the sheer number of animals potentially involved, the need for rapid and decisive responses to limit disease spread or economic damage, and the potential for extenuating circumstances limiting availability or deployment of supplies, equipment, and personnel.
I wonât talk about the use of foam on poultry but only to mention one of its greatest advantages is to limit exposure to zoonoses esp hi-path flu as occurred in Deleware in 2007. H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1 HPAI),
Foam depopulation methods were initially developed as an alternative to modified atmosphere depopulation methods for floor-raised poultry [165]. Advantages of foam over other depopulation methods include reduced overall time required to depopulate farms, reduced number of workers required and their potential exposure to zoonotic diseases, less physical activity while wearing personal protective equipment, suppression of airborne particulates, enhancement of carcass disposal using in-house composting, and greater flexibility of use in various style poultry houses, including those structurally damaged [166].
The use of foam is conditionally approved for situations in which animals are 1) infected with a potentially zoonotic disease, 2) experiencing an outbreak of a rapidly spreading infectious disease that cannot be easily contained, or 3) housed in structurally unsound buildings.
http://www.ava.com.au/policy/44-euthanasia When is euthanasia used?
Euthanasia is used:
when pain, distress or suffering are likely to exceed manageable levels
when the health or welfare of animals is irredeemably compromised; this can include animals affected by drought or other natural disasters.
Humane killing is also used:
for research animals, at the end of studies
in research, to provide tissues for scientific purposes
when animals are no longer required for breeding or other specific purposes
for control of vertebrate pests
for slaughter of stock at abattoirs
for strays and unwanted pets that cannot be rehomed.
Raj and Gregory 1995; majority of tested pigs (75%; Duroc and Large Whites) showed no aversion to 30% CO2 in air.
CO2 is denser than air. It has been extensively studied as a pre-slaughter controlled atmosphere stunning (CAS) agent in pigs,1 and is an AVMA and AASV-approved agent for euthanasia of swine2. CO2 causes acute respiratory acidosis and produces a reversible anesthetic state by rapidly decreasing intracellular pH3. Unlike the inert gases N2 and argon, which must be held within a very narrow range of concentration to produce oxygen levels <2 vol% for effective euthanasia, CO2 can render animals unconscious and kill over a wide range of concentrations, even when O2 >2% 4. CO2 is not listed by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) as an approved method for killing of adult pigs for disease purposes 5; however a CO2 displacement rate between 10 to 30% of the chamber volume per minute is currently recommended for euthanasia of other species as this rate results in unconsciousness prior to carbonic acid activation of ocular and mucous membrane nociceptors6.