Experiences of CMS selection
•
1 gefällt mir•1,028 views
Slides from our presentation at the Museum Computer Network conference 2011. See http://www.mcn.edu/2011/experiences-cms-selection for full details
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Ähnlich wie Experiences of CMS selection
Ähnlich wie Experiences of CMS selection (20)
Mehr von Tristan Roddis
Mehr von Tristan Roddis (10)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Experiences of CMS selection
- 1. Experiences of Tristan Roddis, Cogapp Jeff Strickland, Metropolitan Museum of Art CMS selection Christopher Borkowski, Balboa Park Online Collaborative Steve Norris, Cogapp MCN 2011
- 2. CMS selection: National Portrait Gallery, London Steve Norris, Cogapp
- 3. CMS - Challenges Limited budget Migration from static site Integration with existing systems Ease of use
- 4. CMS - Important Criteria Simple to use and administer Microsites Simplicity of development Workflow & Permissions Open Source
- 5. CMS - Selection Process Research on candidates Requirements list Priority order Short list (5) Present to NPG Demo installations Recommendation
- 7. Speed of development Intuitive CMS interface Flexibility (chunks, snippets) Customizability The Good
- 8. Immature (in 2008) Upgrade cycle (Evolution vs Revolution) Limited 3rd party modules Lack of versioning Simplistic workflow The Bad Code stored in database
- 9. CMS selection: Metropolitan Museum of Art Tristan Roddis, Cogapp; Jeff Strickland, MMA
- 10. Many voices CMS - Challenges Integration with existing systems Ecosystem Legacy content Future systems
- 11. CMS - Important Criteria CMS User Experience Developer Experience Workflow & Permissions Versioning Commercial / Open Source Training, Documentation, Support
- 12. CMS - Selection Process Requirements specification Peer review (15) Long list (20) Research on long list Vendor questionnaire Short list (5) Presented to MMA Final two Use case demos Recommendation
- 14. Vendor training and support Regular upgrade cycle Nice CMS interface Clean separation of content and presentation The Good Extensible Future preview, multi-lingual, in-context editing, CEP...
- 15. Dependence on hierarchy Can be tricky for team development (without TDS) Complicated and complex Blinking cursor The Bad Hard to unit test Documentation holes Bundled third-party modules
- 16. Questions? Picture credits: NPG interior 1: Herry Lawford NPG interior 2: Xixi Lao NPG exterior: Wikipedia user: Ham Met exterior: Wikipedia user: fcb981