1. “Humankind has not woven the web of life.
We are but one thread within it. Whatever we
do to the web, we do to ourselves. All things
are bound together. All things connect.”
Chief Seattle
2. Lisa Riegel: Director, NC Natural Heritage Trust
Fund
Cy Stober: Water Resource Manager, PTRC
Kyle Laird: Mobility and Systems Planner, PART
3.
4.
5. Top Five Strengths
Community Colleges and Universities
Farming and Viticulture
Access to Health Care
Scenic and Recreational Resources
Small Town Charm
Top Five Challenges
A lack of Transportation Choices
Participating in the “New” Economy
Abandoned Mills and Employment Centers including strip
shopping centers
Capitalizing on and Supporting Existing Business Assets
Healthy Community Design
6. The region’s natural resources, one of its
strengths, are frequently threatened.
• The development patterns of the last few decades have led to a
loss of wildlife habitat, threats to biodiversity, degraded water
quality, and increased air pollutants. The economic importance of
scenic and recreational resources is often lost in the desire for
more development.
The Triad is losing working lands (farms and
forestry lands) at an alarming rate; and local
processing and distribution infrastructure is
lacking.
• Forty plus square miles (25,600 acres) of farmland are lost per
year in the region. Some parts of this developed land are rich
with the region’s prime, productive farmland soils. Agriculture is
one of the top economic generators in our region
7. • The built environment shapes
how we live, work, and play
• Transportation and other
“Grey” infrastructure are key
• But Green Infrastructure is
important too!
8. Green infrastructure refers to an interconnected green space network (including
natural areas and features, public and private conservation lands, working lands
with conservation values, and other protected open spaces)
populations.
That is planned and
managed for its
natural resource
values and for the
associated benefits
it confers to
humans.
Riparian Buffers
9. Diverse and healthy ecosystems provide
many important services for humans:
• clean the air
• produce oxygen
• store carbon
• mitigate flooding and other hazards
• protect, filter and recharge water
• decompose and detoxify waste
• generate soils
• provide habitats
10. Provides food and supports crop pollination;
provides timber and other raw materials.
Provides habitats and habitat corridors for plants,
animals and other species.
11. Hanging Rock State Park
Recreational Opportunities
Muddy Creek Greenway
Winston-Salem
16. The Transformation - $65 million
Stream Restoration
• Removed 1,100 ft. of cap
• Purchased 15 acres of floodplain
and removed structures
• Riparian plantings on banks for
stabilization and shading
• Created a Linear Park with
alternative transportation
• Restored the creed and
improved water quality
• Significant economic
development; revitalization of
the area ($300 million+)
17. $4 for every $1 invested for
ecosystem services*
Increased property values,
tourism, health benefits
The Triad’s agribusiness
industry generated gross
revenues of $768 million in
2011
Timber production in our region
produced $124 million in
revenues in 2010.
Hunting, fishing, and wildlife
watching brought in $52 million
in Triad revenue and NC
fees/taxes in 2006
*A study of the ROI from the LWCF by TPL
18.
19.
20. No Responses: Not at all aware:
5% 13%
Had heard the
term, but did not
Very familiar know much about
it: 19%
63%
Familiar
Somewhat familiar
21. 84% Enjoy the outdoors
58% Participant in outdoor sports
55% Hiker, outdoorsperson
49% Conservationist
42% Wildlife enthusiast/watcher
18% Fisherman and/or hunter
7% Other (health advocate,
Land steward, animal lover,
Pedestrian advocate, gardener…)
22. 23% live
outside a
municipality
77% live
inside a
municipality
10% Do
not own
land
17% Own
more than
10 acres
47% Own
less than
1 acre
27% Own
1 to 10
acres
23. 35% of rural survey
Do not participants use their own
participate in On their own
outdoor property property for outdoor
More than 10 recreation adjacent to recreation—only 5% of urban
miles their home
survey participants do so.
48% of urban survey
participants usually take part
in outdoor recreation 5 or
more miles from their homes.
Respondents who indicated
they do not participate in
Between 5 5 miles or less
and 10 miles
outdoor recreation, live within
a city or town.
24. Green Infrastructure Assets, Features and Uses Total Rural Urban
Floodplains 93% 91% 93%
Water supply watersheds 93% 94% 93%
Stream buffers 92% 91% 92%
Farms and farm products 90% 91% 85%
Public open space 90% 82% 91%
Clean water for swimming, fishing, boating 90% 85% 88%
Places with prime farmland soils 89% 94% 85%
Stormwater management 88% 88% 88%
Groundwater recharge areas 88% 85% 88%
Wildlife habitat 86% 85% 87%
Constructed stormwater control measures 86% 85% 84%
Lands managed for conservation and biodiversity purposes 85% 76% 86%
Outdoor recreation 84% 85% 85%
Street and neighborhood trees 84% 74% 86%
Biodiversity 83% 82% 83%
Forests/woodlands and forest products 83% 79% 83%
Rare species 77% 71% 76%
Invasive species 75% 74% 76%
Outdoor educational opportunities 71% 71% 69%
Mining natural resources such as fossil fuels, minerals and ores 55% 47% 53%
25. Concepts in the Management of Green Infrastructure Total Rural Urban
Protection of drinking water supplies 99% 97% 98%
Parks, public trails and greenways 96% 91% 95%
Conservation of significant natural features 94% 94% 92%
Using trees & other methods to lessen heat extremes & reduce energy expense 93% 85% 95%
Conservation of agricultural working lands 92% 97% 92%
Protection of important stream/river headwaters 91% 88% 88%
A regional green infrastructure network of agricultural & natural lands & waters 90% 85% 90%
Reduction of surface stormwater runoff entering streams directly 90% 82% 88%
More ag.- & small- business friendly environment to support working lands 87% 88% 88%
Protection of connected natural landscapes & conservation of wildlife corridors 87% 82% 86%
Assisting landowners in natural resources management 86% 79% 83%
Encouraging new development where infrastructure & utilities currently exist 86% 88% 85%
Conservation of species diversity 80% 74% 79%
Having outdoor recreation opportunities within walking distance of your home 79% 50% 85%
Guidelines for non-ag development in areas of prime soils & land in agriculture 76% 74% 73%
Restricting non-ag development in areas of prime soils & land in agriculture 74% 74% 72%
Encouraging development & extending urban services & utilities into rural areas 28% 26% 26%
The extraction of materials by mining, dredging and quarrying 27% 32% 23%
The extraction of fossil fuels in North Carolina 25% 29% 19%
26. 32% Government employee
17% Educator
16% Retired
15% Environmental Professional
15% Business owner
11% Engineering/Design Professional
9% Land-use planner
8% Farmer
7% Health care professional
3% Forester
1% Elected official
1% Real Estate/Dev. Professional
16% Other (nonprofit, volunteer, student, horticulturalist, housewife, writer…)
30. Uses GIS assessments which identify, evaluate and prioritize
important natural resources required to maintain healthy and
sustainable ecosystems
31. Uses GIS assessments which identify, evaluate and prioritize
important natural resources required to maintain healthy and
sustainable ecosystems
Guidance and templates
• NCDENR:
Conservation Planning Tool
Green Growth Tool Box
32. Uses GIS assessments which identify, evaluate and prioritize
important natural resources required to maintain healthy and
sustainable ecosystems
Guidance and templates
• NCDENR:
Conservation Planning Tool
Green Growth Tool Box
• Land of Sky Regional Council:
Linking Lands Project
Three primary assessments:
• Water Resource Services
• Agricultural
• Biodiversity/Wildlife Habitat
33. Uses GIS assessments which identify, evaluate and prioritize important
natural resources required to maintain healthy and sustainable
ecosystems
Guidance and templates
• NCDENR:
Conservation Planning Tool
Green Growth Tool Box
• Land of Sky Regional Council:
Linking Lands Project
Three primary assessments:
• Water Resource Services
• Agricultural
• Biodiversity/Wildlife Habitat
• Threats to Green Infrastructure
59. Uses GIS assessments which identify, evaluate and prioritize important
natural resources required to maintain healthy and sustainable
ecosystems
Guidance and templates
• NCDENR:
Conservation Planning Tool
Green Growth Tool Box
• Land of Sky Regional Council:
Linking Lands Project
Three primary assessments:
• Water Resource Services
• Agricultural
• Biodiversity/Wildlife Habitat
• Threats to Green Infrastructure
73. How do GI needs integrate with your
needs?
How can a GI Network be valuable?
74. How do GI needs integrate with your
needs?
How can a GI Network be valuable?
How do we accomplish our goals?
75. How do GI needs integrate with your
needs?
How can a GI Network be valuable?
How do we accomplish our goals?
How do we serve everyone in the Triad?
76. Lisa Riegel: Director, NC Natural Heritage Trust Fund
Lisa.riegel@ncdenr.gov
Cy Stober: Water Resource Manager, PTRC
cstober@ptrc.org
Kyle Laird: Mobility and Systems Planner, PART
kylel@partnc.org
www.triadsustainability.org
www.piedmontvoice.org
Hinweis der Redaktion
12 Counties 68 municipalities, 1.6 million peopleGeographically and economically connected region Commuting patterns are centered on the two core counties PiedmontTriad is identified as one of the 7 economic development regions in NC.Piedmont Together is a community based regional planning project which is addressing the future success of all communities while focusing on the interconnectedness of our economic, geographic and historic infrastructure.The project is funded by a $1.6 million grant thorough the Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentThe lead agency of Piedmont Together is the Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation in close partnership with The Piedmont Triad Regional Council.
At the beginning of the project we createdseveral public stakeholder work groups.One of these groups focuses on Green Infrastructure. Over the course of the project the Green Infrastructure work group has had many participants representing several agencies, municipalities and nonprofits.
During the first several months, the work groups gathered regional data and prepared educational materials to be presented at public forums.About 8 months into the project we held public forums in all 12 counties.From public discussion at the forums we took back lists of top strengths and challenges. After reviewing these lists, commonalities were very apparent and these strengths and challenges were identified as the top 5 of each within the Piedmont Triad. Note the ones highlighted in yellow Farming and Viticulture and Scenic and Recreational Resources in the strengths category and Healthy Community Design in the challenges category We could argue that all these strengths and challenges can have some connection with Green Infrastructure, but the highlighted ones have the most direct links.
Focusing on the Strengths and Challenges identified by the public at the forums, and using the data and resources gathered by the work groups; the Piedmont Together project team came up with several “reasons to care”.These two are the ones which touch largely on Green Infrastructure issues in our region.An example of a threat to our Natural Resources:We have 1,602 miles of Good Waters in the Triad region and 33,258 acres (lakes) and 596 miles (streams) of Impaired WatersLoss for working lands:From 2002 to 2007, the Triad lost 215 sq. miles of farmland to development—this is comparable to losing the entirety of Davie County over five years
There are many variations of the definition, but basically this is the one we settled on. Urban vs Rural. Allison (Schwarz) Weakley 2/6/2013Perhaps just have the GI hub/corridor image on this slide only - otherwise too busy. Also check that the GI definition is from the GI poster we created. Introduce the concept of urban and rural GI - the former is more focused on construction/restoration/enhancement, the latter on maintaining what we already have in place. Tie them together with a landscape approach - focus on the interconnected network of important natural resources.Bioswales are landscape elements designed to remove silt and pollution from surface runoff water. They consist of aswaled drainage course with gently sloped sides (less than six percent) and filled with vegetation, compost and/orriprap.[1]:19 The water's flow path, along with the wide and shallow ditch, is designed to maximize the time water spends in the swale, which aids the trapping of pollutants and silt. Depending upon the geometry of land available, a bioswale may have a meandering or almost straight channel alignment. Biological factors also contribute to the breakdown of certain pollutants.[2]A common application is around parking lots, where substantial automotive pollution is collected by the paving and then flushed by rain. The bioswale, or other type of biofilter, wraps around the parking lot and treats the runoff before releasing it to the watershed or storm sewer.
Healthy wetland. We have 1,602 miles of Good Waters in the Triad region and 33,258 acres (lakes) and 596 miles (streams) of Impaired Waters
Uwharrie forest, Guildford County FarmFrom 2002 to 2007, the Triad lost 215 sq. miles of farmland to development—this is comparable to losing the entirety of Davie County over five years
Tourism is 3rd major sector in our economy behind agribusiness ($68 billion) and the military ($23 billion)
Our regulatory programs also promote green infrastructure by regulating stormwater runoff. Some techniques to better deal with stormwater include riparian buffer – a vegetated strip along streams – the vegetation slows the movement to the stream, allowing it to infiltrate through the soils, getting filtered before discharging to the stream, Permeable pavers and rain gardens serve a similar purpose
The built environment shapes how we live, work and playTransportation is the most significant land use and economic development decision we makeBut Green Infrastructure important tooThe study and others clearly show a relationship between the natural environment, green space, trees, and human health. An interesting point is that blood pressure levels are reduced more if you walk in an area lined with trees that on an urban concrete street with no trees.$81 million/year in saved health care costs
What is public perception of our green infrastructure? How do we present the data we already have so people can understand it? This is a map of some of the Green Infrastructure in the Piedmont Triad.It is hard to make sense of this map—there are so many elements to Green Infrastructure and not all are represented on this map. Some elements presented on this map are not shown to their full extent. The Piedmont Together project wants to make sense of these elements in a comprehensive and organized way. To be able to share a prioritized system of Green Infrastructure assets with government planning and development staff region wide.
So the Green Infrastructure work group created an on-line survey to gather information from the public.We wanted to find out what the public new about Green Infrastructure and how they felt about these assets.
We started by giving participants the definition to green infrastructure we are using in our project.Then asked whether folks were aware of, and to what degree, green infrastructure before they read the definition.A majority of participants were familiar with the term.However a sizable minority, 32%, did not know much or anything about Green Infrastructure as a concept.
We wanted to get an idea of how the survey respondents connected to open space and natural and rural places.We found that most responded that they enjoyed the outdoorsWe knew that we did not catch all the interests/categories in our list, so we added an other box. There were several new categories identified, however, no newly identified category had more than one or two respondents this does not discount the value of these connections to green infrastructure and others may have identified with the new categories if they had seen them in the list.
We wanted to know about respondents’ proximity to green infrastructureOne question was to find out where respondents lived: inside or outside a municipality. owned land and if so, how much.Most respondents live in a city, town or villageA large minority own less than 1 acre of landAnd a moderately large minority owns from 1 to 10 acres of land.
Another question we asked in order to find out respondents’ proximity to green infrastructure was to ask how close to home they generally take part in outdoor recreational activities. we did not define what outdoor recreational activities are—this we felt was up to the respondent to define for themselvesWe found that a small majority are able to take advantage of outdoor recreation within a relatively short 5 miles or less.When we take the responses to this question filter them by whether a person lives within a municipality or not (urban or rural), we found that a sizable minority of urban dwellers who responded to the survey (48% of them) generally travel more than 5 miles from their homes to take part in recreational activities. Only 5% of urban dwellers generally find outdoor recreation on their own property adjacent to their homes. This is 35% for rural survey participants.
Urban and Rural columns are only for those who gave home zip codes. The total column includes everyone who answered the rating questions.The meat of the survey is in this slide and the next.We want to know more about the values of Piedmont Triad residents when it comes to green infrastructure. What are the green infrastructure features they feel are important.We asked participants to rank each of a list of green infrastructure assets, features and uses separately on a 5 point scale from not important to very important.In the chart you see here, the figures indicate the percentages of respondents who considered the corresponding asset, feature or use as either important or very important.The chart shows that only one use of our natural resources received a small majority (mining). All of the other assets, features and uses in the list received a fair majority.It is interesting then to look at the percentages relative to one another and to compare any differences between rural and urban respondents.Assets connected to water supply and quality (floodplains and riparian zones, clean water for recreation) had percentages in the 90sYet when we ask about stormwater management or control measures (which are very important to water quality), we dip into the 80s. Biodiversity, rare species and invasive species get lower relative scores.The differences between how rural and urban folks responded to this ranking exercise are highlighted in red when there is a 5 or more % difference. The highest differences are seen in the value of public open space, prime farmland soils, lands managed for conservation and biodiversity and street trees. Prime farmland soils were valued more by rural respondents. The other three were more valued by urban respondents.
Urban and Rural columns are only for those who gave home zip codes. The total column includes everyone who answered the rating questions.This ranking exercise was similar to the first one, however, here we were asking what concepts connected to green infrastructure management would respondents be most supportive.This chart gives the percetages of respondents who indicated that they support or strongly support the corresponding concept.Here we see that there are minorities of respondents who support (all below 30% of respondents) encouraging development and extending urban services and utilities into rural areas the extraction of materials by mining, dredging and quarrying the extraction of fossil fuels in North Carolina