SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
Institutional Research
   A setting in the UK? or
   A focus on British people abroad?
   A predominantly British cast?
   A storyline about some aspect of British life?
   Based on the work of a British author?
   Significant returns for the UK economy
    through film making, inward investment, film
    exhibition, DVD rentals and sales, film exports
   The UK Film Council estimates that a
    successful Brit film will make up to 70% of its
    revenue outside the UK
 If a film addresses a domestic
  audience about culturally
  specific themes, is it likely to
  find wider distribution
  difficult?
 Will non British people want
  to see the film?
 What significant advantage
  do British filmmakers have
  over European filmmakers?
   British film production companies have co-
    production and distribution with Hollywood
    studios
   ‘British’ films can be funded and distributed
    by US companies
   Decisions on which British films to produce
    and how to market them are often based on
    the tastes of both domestic and American
    audiences
   Hollywood is built around studios
   Companies who aim to make money from
    films
   Why are Hollywood blockbuster movies so
    successful?
   In general Hollywood has been able to
    continually re-invent itself by responding to a
    changing marketplace and taking advantage
    of new opportunities offered by new
    technologies
   British film has become more confident in
    expanding its range to include a wider cross-
    section of ethnic groupings, gender groupings
    and cultural groupings
   Promoting diversity and offering a more
    representative and inclusive national identity
   Slumdog is a recent example!
   180 million tickets sold
    yearly
   Inward investment to
    improve the cinemagoing
    experience
   80% of admissions come out
    of mainstream American
    distributors
   British „themes‟ and values
   Hollywood realised that there is serious money
    to be made in international distribution so they
    invest heavily
   They retain the rights to their films so secure
    profits for many years
   British film industry is production led whereby
    distribution is usually through an American
    company
   Any money made is not going back into the
    British film industry
   „Cottage‟ industry
   2004 – UK output 27
   British film industry unable to respond to
    increasing audience demand
   Hollywood has diversified and strengthened
    to develop links with other media and
    delivery platforms creating vast media
    empires
   Global market at $63 billion in 2003
   US takes 80% of this global market
   A British production company – finances British films
   1982 – 1998 known as Channel 4 film
   Part of channel 4s remit was to experiment and
    innovate and cater for audiences not addressed by
    other channels
   Nowadays they fund around 20 films per year
   A number of films are by first time feature
    screenwriters or directors
   They look for distinctive films which will make their
    mark in a competitive cinema market
   Television premieres on FilmFour Channel and Channel
    4 2 years after theatrical release
 David Rose, commissioning
  editor, “a preference for
  contemporary and social political
  topics”
 My Beautiful Laundrette (1985)
  portrayed the homosexual
  relationship between a white fascist
  and a Omar, born in Britain to
  Pakistani parents.
 Main audiences were
  contemporary critical audiences in
  the 20 – 30 age ranges
 Before Laundrette, a large
  percentage of the British
  population went largely
  unrepresented
   1996
   Starring Ewan McGregor
    in his 2nd film
   Directed by Danny Boyle
    a British director
   A co-production with
    Figment Films, Polygram
    and The Noel Gay
    Motion Picture co.
   Budget $3,500,000
   David Aukin, Head of Drama at Four Films “it
    isn‟t really about drugs…it‟s a buddy movie”
   US critics compared the movie to Kubricks „A
    Clockwork Orange‟
   Both are anti-social-realist films dealing with
    subjects – gangs, violence, drugs – which are
    stylised and fast-paced.
   Both are independent films which shocked
    the critics and audiences
 However Trainspotting was more an object of youth
  culture or popular culture than it was cinematic
 Britpop was Trainspotting's main vehicle to integrate
  youth subculture into popular culture.
 Polygram put large sums of money into a sophisticated
  marketing and branding strategy including posters and
  a soundtrack
 Knew film would appeal to clubbers and ravers so
  targeted these – Underworld‟s Born Slippy became a
  massive hit from the soundtrack
 Film gained distribution in the US although it did need
  subtitles!
   The „brand‟ Trainspotting
   Soundtrack
   Posters
   DVDs
   Copied of the screenplay
   Reprinting of Welsh‟s novel
    featuring the poster on the
    cover
   Music cross-promotion
   1994
   Starring Hugh Grant and
    Andie MacDowell
   Co-production with
    Polygram and Working
    Title
   Budget $6,000,000
   Played upon aspects of
    national identity
   Played upon the more „naïve‟
    elements of Britishness
   Hugh Grants quintessential
    fumbling middle class
    gentleman
   Appealing to an American
    audience
   A universal storyline of
    romance and a feel good happy
    ending
   2008
   Funded by Film4
   Co-production with Celador and Pathe
   Directed by Danny Boyle
   Budget $15,000,000
   Typical cost rose from £400k to £1.8million

   Trainspotting and Four Weddings were hugely
    successful although appealed to very different
    audiences

   Trainspotting was a low budget film which
    had carved itself a niche audience
   FilmFour films explored and developed ideas
    of cultural hybridity
   East is East
   The first British film representing hybrid and
    ever changing cultural and social mix in
    Britain making it into mainstream multiplex
    cinemas.
   Brick Lane (2007) won a BAFTA

More Related Content

What's hot (19)

British film
British filmBritish film
British film
 
An introduction to British Cinema
An introduction to British Cinema An introduction to British Cinema
An introduction to British Cinema
 
The British and US Film Industry
The British and US Film IndustryThe British and US Film Industry
The British and US Film Industry
 
Hollywood vs
Hollywood vsHollywood vs
Hollywood vs
 
US Film Industry 2016
US Film Industry 2016US Film Industry 2016
US Film Industry 2016
 
Study notes
Study notesStudy notes
Study notes
 
Film 4
Film 4Film 4
Film 4
 
Film4 presentation
Film4  presentationFilm4  presentation
Film4 presentation
 
Working title
Working titleWorking title
Working title
 
British cinema since 1990 (2)
British cinema since 1990 (2)British cinema since 1990 (2)
British cinema since 1990 (2)
 
1990s british film
1990s british film1990s british film
1990s british film
 
British cinema
British cinemaBritish cinema
British cinema
 
The Boat that Rocked Case Study Summary
The Boat that Rocked Case Study SummaryThe Boat that Rocked Case Study Summary
The Boat that Rocked Case Study Summary
 
Film4[1]
Film4[1]Film4[1]
Film4[1]
 
Working Title Case Study
Working Title Case StudyWorking Title Case Study
Working Title Case Study
 
Media Ownership - USA vs UK
Media Ownership - USA vs UKMedia Ownership - USA vs UK
Media Ownership - USA vs UK
 
What is a british film funding
What is a british film   fundingWhat is a british film   funding
What is a british film funding
 
Working title
Working titleWorking title
Working title
 
Discuss the issues raised by media ownership in
Discuss the issues raised by media ownership inDiscuss the issues raised by media ownership in
Discuss the issues raised by media ownership in
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Film 4 part 2
Film 4   part 2Film 4   part 2
Film 4 part 2
 
Film 4
Film 4Film 4
Film 4
 
From Rome to Egypt: 4 trends in Business IT
From Rome to Egypt: 4 trends in Business ITFrom Rome to Egypt: 4 trends in Business IT
From Rome to Egypt: 4 trends in Business IT
 
Film 4 production company- Research
Film 4 production company- ResearchFilm 4 production company- Research
Film 4 production company- Research
 
Film4
Film4Film4
Film4
 
Film 4
Film 4Film 4
Film 4
 
Nmt film 4
Nmt film 4Nmt film 4
Nmt film 4
 
Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3Evaluation Question 3
Evaluation Question 3
 
Film 4 powerpoint
Film 4 powerpointFilm 4 powerpoint
Film 4 powerpoint
 
Film4
Film4 Film4
Film4
 
Intro to Film: Screenwriting
Intro to Film: ScreenwritingIntro to Film: Screenwriting
Intro to Film: Screenwriting
 
Film4 factfile
Film4 factfileFilm4 factfile
Film4 factfile
 
Film 4 presentation
Film 4 presentationFilm 4 presentation
Film 4 presentation
 
Ai 4 film industry
Ai 4 film industryAi 4 film industry
Ai 4 film industry
 
L2A&1
L2A&1L2A&1
L2A&1
 
Freytag's Pyramid
Freytag's PyramidFreytag's Pyramid
Freytag's Pyramid
 
Understanding Movies
Understanding MoviesUnderstanding Movies
Understanding Movies
 
Film 4 2
Film 4 2Film 4 2
Film 4 2
 
Plot diagram assignment
Plot diagram assignmentPlot diagram assignment
Plot diagram assignment
 
Film4 revision
Film4 revisionFilm4 revision
Film4 revision
 

Similar to Film 4 part 1

Similar to Film 4 part 1 (20)

Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
Media AS Revision 009 (Section B)
 
Media ownership essay
Media ownership essayMedia ownership essay
Media ownership essay
 
What determines a british film
What determines a british filmWhat determines a british film
What determines a british film
 
G322 Case Study - Working Title and The Boat That Rocked
G322 Case Study - Working Title and The Boat That RockedG322 Case Study - Working Title and The Boat That Rocked
G322 Case Study - Working Title and The Boat That Rocked
 
Globalisation
GlobalisationGlobalisation
Globalisation
 
Revision working title and tbtr
Revision   working title and tbtrRevision   working title and tbtr
Revision working title and tbtr
 
Hollywood vs
Hollywood vsHollywood vs
Hollywood vs
 
L3A&1
L3A&1L3A&1
L3A&1
 
презентация Microsoft office power point
презентация Microsoft office power pointпрезентация Microsoft office power point
презентация Microsoft office power point
 
The British Film Industry 2, CGS
The British Film Industry 2, CGSThe British Film Industry 2, CGS
The British Film Industry 2, CGS
 
AS Revision Powerpoint
AS Revision PowerpointAS Revision Powerpoint
AS Revision Powerpoint
 
2 Uk Film Council
2   Uk Film Council2   Uk Film Council
2 Uk Film Council
 
Production funding.pdf
Production funding.pdf Production funding.pdf
Production funding.pdf
 
The British Film Industry, CGS
The British Film Industry, CGSThe British Film Industry, CGS
The British Film Industry, CGS
 
Horror
HorrorHorror
Horror
 
Working titles andWARP
Working titles andWARPWorking titles andWARP
Working titles andWARP
 
The british film industry2
The british film industry2The british film industry2
The british film industry2
 
Warp Films and working title films
Warp Films  and working title films Warp Films  and working title films
Warp Films and working title films
 
The uk film industry as film studies
The uk film industry as film studiesThe uk film industry as film studies
The uk film industry as film studies
 
British Cinema History
British Cinema HistoryBritish Cinema History
British Cinema History
 

More from Tracey Spavins (20)

Storyboarding
StoryboardingStoryboarding
Storyboarding
 
As media studies lesson 1
As media studies   lesson 1As media studies   lesson 1
As media studies lesson 1
 
Colons and semi colons power point
Colons and semi colons power pointColons and semi colons power point
Colons and semi colons power point
 
Horror films hand out
Horror films hand outHorror films hand out
Horror films hand out
 
Horror genre
Horror genreHorror genre
Horror genre
 
As intro lesson
As intro lessonAs intro lesson
As intro lesson
 
Micro Features Lesson
Micro Features LessonMicro Features Lesson
Micro Features Lesson
 
8. editing and cinematography for mv
8. editing and cinematography for mv8. editing and cinematography for mv
8. editing and cinematography for mv
 
7. theories for production
7. theories for production7. theories for production
7. theories for production
 
5. digipak analysis
5. digipak analysis5. digipak analysis
5. digipak analysis
 
3. genre research and audience expectations
3. genre research and audience expectations3. genre research and audience expectations
3. genre research and audience expectations
 
4. record labels and permission
4. record labels and permission4. record labels and permission
4. record labels and permission
 
1. star image
1. star image1. star image
1. star image
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
Introduction
 
Open evening tv screens v2
Open evening tv screens v2Open evening tv screens v2
Open evening tv screens v2
 
Section b technology
Section b   technologySection b   technology
Section b technology
 
Section b synergy
Section b   synergySection b   synergy
Section b synergy
 
Mldp information tp september 2012
Mldp information tp september 2012Mldp information tp september 2012
Mldp information tp september 2012
 
Theory
TheoryTheory
Theory
 
Task 2 camera shots
Task 2  camera shotsTask 2  camera shots
Task 2 camera shots
 

Film 4 part 1

  • 2. A setting in the UK? or  A focus on British people abroad?  A predominantly British cast?  A storyline about some aspect of British life?  Based on the work of a British author?
  • 3. Significant returns for the UK economy through film making, inward investment, film exhibition, DVD rentals and sales, film exports  The UK Film Council estimates that a successful Brit film will make up to 70% of its revenue outside the UK
  • 4.  If a film addresses a domestic audience about culturally specific themes, is it likely to find wider distribution difficult?  Will non British people want to see the film?  What significant advantage do British filmmakers have over European filmmakers?
  • 5. British film production companies have co- production and distribution with Hollywood studios  ‘British’ films can be funded and distributed by US companies  Decisions on which British films to produce and how to market them are often based on the tastes of both domestic and American audiences
  • 6. Hollywood is built around studios  Companies who aim to make money from films  Why are Hollywood blockbuster movies so successful?
  • 7. In general Hollywood has been able to continually re-invent itself by responding to a changing marketplace and taking advantage of new opportunities offered by new technologies
  • 8. British film has become more confident in expanding its range to include a wider cross- section of ethnic groupings, gender groupings and cultural groupings  Promoting diversity and offering a more representative and inclusive national identity  Slumdog is a recent example!
  • 9. 180 million tickets sold yearly  Inward investment to improve the cinemagoing experience  80% of admissions come out of mainstream American distributors  British „themes‟ and values
  • 10. Hollywood realised that there is serious money to be made in international distribution so they invest heavily  They retain the rights to their films so secure profits for many years  British film industry is production led whereby distribution is usually through an American company  Any money made is not going back into the British film industry  „Cottage‟ industry
  • 11. 2004 – UK output 27  British film industry unable to respond to increasing audience demand  Hollywood has diversified and strengthened to develop links with other media and delivery platforms creating vast media empires  Global market at $63 billion in 2003  US takes 80% of this global market
  • 12. A British production company – finances British films  1982 – 1998 known as Channel 4 film  Part of channel 4s remit was to experiment and innovate and cater for audiences not addressed by other channels  Nowadays they fund around 20 films per year  A number of films are by first time feature screenwriters or directors  They look for distinctive films which will make their mark in a competitive cinema market  Television premieres on FilmFour Channel and Channel 4 2 years after theatrical release
  • 13.  David Rose, commissioning editor, “a preference for contemporary and social political topics”  My Beautiful Laundrette (1985) portrayed the homosexual relationship between a white fascist and a Omar, born in Britain to Pakistani parents.  Main audiences were contemporary critical audiences in the 20 – 30 age ranges  Before Laundrette, a large percentage of the British population went largely unrepresented
  • 14. 1996  Starring Ewan McGregor in his 2nd film  Directed by Danny Boyle a British director  A co-production with Figment Films, Polygram and The Noel Gay Motion Picture co.  Budget $3,500,000
  • 15. David Aukin, Head of Drama at Four Films “it isn‟t really about drugs…it‟s a buddy movie”  US critics compared the movie to Kubricks „A Clockwork Orange‟  Both are anti-social-realist films dealing with subjects – gangs, violence, drugs – which are stylised and fast-paced.  Both are independent films which shocked the critics and audiences
  • 16.  However Trainspotting was more an object of youth culture or popular culture than it was cinematic  Britpop was Trainspotting's main vehicle to integrate youth subculture into popular culture.  Polygram put large sums of money into a sophisticated marketing and branding strategy including posters and a soundtrack  Knew film would appeal to clubbers and ravers so targeted these – Underworld‟s Born Slippy became a massive hit from the soundtrack  Film gained distribution in the US although it did need subtitles!
  • 17. The „brand‟ Trainspotting  Soundtrack  Posters  DVDs  Copied of the screenplay  Reprinting of Welsh‟s novel featuring the poster on the cover  Music cross-promotion
  • 18. 1994  Starring Hugh Grant and Andie MacDowell  Co-production with Polygram and Working Title  Budget $6,000,000
  • 19. Played upon aspects of national identity  Played upon the more „naïve‟ elements of Britishness  Hugh Grants quintessential fumbling middle class gentleman  Appealing to an American audience  A universal storyline of romance and a feel good happy ending
  • 20. 2008  Funded by Film4  Co-production with Celador and Pathe  Directed by Danny Boyle  Budget $15,000,000
  • 21. Typical cost rose from £400k to £1.8million  Trainspotting and Four Weddings were hugely successful although appealed to very different audiences  Trainspotting was a low budget film which had carved itself a niche audience
  • 22. FilmFour films explored and developed ideas of cultural hybridity  East is East  The first British film representing hybrid and ever changing cultural and social mix in Britain making it into mainstream multiplex cinemas.  Brick Lane (2007) won a BAFTA