SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 1
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Current Event Eleven
Will Justice Kennedy strike down Californiaʼs gay marriage ban?
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/justice-kennedy-strike-down-california-gay-marriage-
ban-091810994--election.html
! After all the controversy with gay marriage, Justice Anthony Kennedy now finds
himself as the swing vote on this issue. He will now listen to two arguments to influence
his decision. The issues up for debate are californiaʼs voter-approved ban on gay
marriage (Proposition 8) violates the constitutional rights of gay people in the state. The
other issue is if the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act is legal. The Defense of Marriage Act
states that only marriage between two people of opposite sex are federally valid. This is
so controversial because based on this ruling potentially all gay marriage bans will be
deemed unconstitutional or gay couples will be deemed to have no constitutional right to
marriage.
! Kennedy is actually a conservative Republican making the possibility of him
being the swing vote shocking for many. There have been a few exceptions to this
conservative views such as his support in Roe v Wade and that states may not
sentence the death penalty for crimes committed as a juvenile. Many suspect once
again he will sway from his conservative colleagues and stand with the liberals. Despite
the speculations, many find it more reasonable that he will go against Californiaʼs
proposition 8 on narrower premise so this doesnʼt become a matter that will effect the
gay marriage bans nationally and will only effect California.
! The reason for the expectation of him siding with the liberals is based off of
statements Kennedy has released. He wrote an opinion on Romer v Evans saying that
he was against the discrimination of gay people and that the law was an outrage
because it appeared to be motivated by hatred of a group of people. Kennedy has
opened the door for wider fir the fight for same sex marriage as he is admitting to the
moral dilemma this has created. He disproves of the discrimination of it but from a legal
standpoint people are unsure of how he will vote.
! I personally think itʼs great that people you wouldnʼt expect to come around are
slowly coming around. My opinions on gay rights are pretty standard for really every
controversial issue. This does not effect me. I think we need to legalize gay marriage.
Those who want to marry are now able too. If someone is against it, then donʼt go get
married to someone of the same sex. This is more of a religious/moral issue to me than
a true legal one. People are up in arms because one side thinks it ruins the sanctity of
marriage. The other side is up in arms because they feel like they are being denied
rights. Separation of religion and government. If same sex marry and you think they are
going to hell, how is that your problem? You arenʼt the one going to hell, they are. So
what difference does it make from that stand point?
! I just am tired of the battle. If you donʼt like it, donʼt participate. That doesnʼt mean
other people need to suffer because of what someone else believes. If it was up to me I
would allow gay marriage. This in no way effects me so why would I be up in arms
about it? Not that big of a deal. Everyone just needs to calm down.
Tara Pawlyk Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:58 PM ET 04:0c:ce:d3:10:88

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von tp3115

Chapter 23
Chapter 23Chapter 23
Chapter 23tp3115
 
Chapter 22
Chapter 22Chapter 22
Chapter 22tp3115
 
Chapter 21
Chapter 21Chapter 21
Chapter 21tp3115
 
Chapter 20
Chapter 20Chapter 20
Chapter 20tp3115
 
Chapter 19
Chapter 19Chapter 19
Chapter 19tp3115
 
Chapter 18
Chapter 18Chapter 18
Chapter 18tp3115
 
Chapter 17
Chapter 17Chapter 17
Chapter 17tp3115
 
Chapter 16
Chapter 16Chapter 16
Chapter 16tp3115
 
Chapter 15
Chapter 15Chapter 15
Chapter 15tp3115
 
Chapter 14
Chapter 14Chapter 14
Chapter 14tp3115
 
Chapter 13
Chapter 13Chapter 13
Chapter 13tp3115
 
Chapter 12
Chapter 12Chapter 12
Chapter 12tp3115
 
Politic parties e qs
Politic parties e qsPolitic parties e qs
Politic parties e qstp3115
 
Chapter 6
Chapter 6Chapter 6
Chapter 6tp3115
 
Elections eq
Elections eqElections eq
Elections eqtp3115
 
Executive branch e qs
Executive branch e qsExecutive branch e qs
Executive branch e qstp3115
 
Legal rights eq
Legal rights eqLegal rights eq
Legal rights eqtp3115
 
Law notes
Law notesLaw notes
Law notestp3115
 
Judicial notes
Judicial notesJudicial notes
Judicial notestp3115
 

Mehr von tp3115 (20)

Ce 12
Ce 12Ce 12
Ce 12
 
Chapter 23
Chapter 23Chapter 23
Chapter 23
 
Chapter 22
Chapter 22Chapter 22
Chapter 22
 
Chapter 21
Chapter 21Chapter 21
Chapter 21
 
Chapter 20
Chapter 20Chapter 20
Chapter 20
 
Chapter 19
Chapter 19Chapter 19
Chapter 19
 
Chapter 18
Chapter 18Chapter 18
Chapter 18
 
Chapter 17
Chapter 17Chapter 17
Chapter 17
 
Chapter 16
Chapter 16Chapter 16
Chapter 16
 
Chapter 15
Chapter 15Chapter 15
Chapter 15
 
Chapter 14
Chapter 14Chapter 14
Chapter 14
 
Chapter 13
Chapter 13Chapter 13
Chapter 13
 
Chapter 12
Chapter 12Chapter 12
Chapter 12
 
Politic parties e qs
Politic parties e qsPolitic parties e qs
Politic parties e qs
 
Chapter 6
Chapter 6Chapter 6
Chapter 6
 
Elections eq
Elections eqElections eq
Elections eq
 
Executive branch e qs
Executive branch e qsExecutive branch e qs
Executive branch e qs
 
Legal rights eq
Legal rights eqLegal rights eq
Legal rights eq
 
Law notes
Law notesLaw notes
Law notes
 
Judicial notes
Judicial notesJudicial notes
Judicial notes
 

Ce 11

  • 1. Current Event Eleven Will Justice Kennedy strike down Californiaʼs gay marriage ban? http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/justice-kennedy-strike-down-california-gay-marriage- ban-091810994--election.html ! After all the controversy with gay marriage, Justice Anthony Kennedy now finds himself as the swing vote on this issue. He will now listen to two arguments to influence his decision. The issues up for debate are californiaʼs voter-approved ban on gay marriage (Proposition 8) violates the constitutional rights of gay people in the state. The other issue is if the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act is legal. The Defense of Marriage Act states that only marriage between two people of opposite sex are federally valid. This is so controversial because based on this ruling potentially all gay marriage bans will be deemed unconstitutional or gay couples will be deemed to have no constitutional right to marriage. ! Kennedy is actually a conservative Republican making the possibility of him being the swing vote shocking for many. There have been a few exceptions to this conservative views such as his support in Roe v Wade and that states may not sentence the death penalty for crimes committed as a juvenile. Many suspect once again he will sway from his conservative colleagues and stand with the liberals. Despite the speculations, many find it more reasonable that he will go against Californiaʼs proposition 8 on narrower premise so this doesnʼt become a matter that will effect the gay marriage bans nationally and will only effect California. ! The reason for the expectation of him siding with the liberals is based off of statements Kennedy has released. He wrote an opinion on Romer v Evans saying that he was against the discrimination of gay people and that the law was an outrage because it appeared to be motivated by hatred of a group of people. Kennedy has opened the door for wider fir the fight for same sex marriage as he is admitting to the moral dilemma this has created. He disproves of the discrimination of it but from a legal standpoint people are unsure of how he will vote. ! I personally think itʼs great that people you wouldnʼt expect to come around are slowly coming around. My opinions on gay rights are pretty standard for really every controversial issue. This does not effect me. I think we need to legalize gay marriage. Those who want to marry are now able too. If someone is against it, then donʼt go get married to someone of the same sex. This is more of a religious/moral issue to me than a true legal one. People are up in arms because one side thinks it ruins the sanctity of marriage. The other side is up in arms because they feel like they are being denied rights. Separation of religion and government. If same sex marry and you think they are going to hell, how is that your problem? You arenʼt the one going to hell, they are. So what difference does it make from that stand point? ! I just am tired of the battle. If you donʼt like it, donʼt participate. That doesnʼt mean other people need to suffer because of what someone else believes. If it was up to me I would allow gay marriage. This in no way effects me so why would I be up in arms about it? Not that big of a deal. Everyone just needs to calm down. Tara Pawlyk Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:58 PM ET 04:0c:ce:d3:10:88