1. CIED implant trouble shoot in cath.
room
Allied Professional Training, THRS
19st, Oct, 2013
黃鴻儒 醫師
2. Classification of Pacemaker Complications by Clinical
Presentation
Implant related
complication
Post-implant
complication
New symptoms
secondary to
PPM
Asymptomatic
ECG
abnormalities
Pneumothorax (
due to subclavian
puncture
Other complications
of subclavian
puncture
Hematoma
Lead perforation
Lead dislodgment
Lead placement in
the systemic
circulation
Lead fracture
Lead insulation
defect
Loose lead
connector
Extracardiac
stimulation
Pacemaker
syndrome
Pacemaker
mediated
tachycardia
Infection
Pain
Failure to capture
Failure to sense
Oversensing
(failure to output)
Change in paced
rate
Twiddler syndrome
7. Acute Hemothorax Complicating Subclavian
Venipuncture
Within 15 minutes of
subclavian arterial
puncture
3 hours postprocedure
8. Management for Pneumothorax
Suspect lung puncture withdraw the needle, wait a
moment to make certain that a rapid-onset, large, markedly
symptomatic pneumothorax is not occurring.
If a pneumothorax does develop, it may not even be
apparent radiographically at the end of the procedure.
If a lung puncture has occurred, obtaining another upright
chest radiograph 6 hours after completion of the
procedure is advisable.
If a pneumothorax has developed, a chest tube or
catheter evacuation procedure may be necessary,
although frequently, a small to moderate pneumothorax
that is not expanding can be managed conservatively
without evacuation.
9. Air Embolism during Permanent Pacemaker
Procedures
Avoid air embolism (esp. for largebored sheaths)
press proximal end of sheath and
instruct patient to hold breath during
pacing lead insertion
use of introducer sheath with
hemostatic valve
11. Myocardial Perforation
When recognized, lead MUST
be pulled back ?!
Be prepared for tamponade
May require open procedure
to manage but heart usually
seals itself.
14. Implantation Procedure #1
Recorded
immediately postimplant.
The atrial sensing
threshold was 1.8
mV, the ventricular
sensing threshold
was 12 mV
As Vp
Vs
As Vp
Marker of
pacemaker
What is the cause of this behavior?
15. Implantation Procedure #1
P wave marker
is above a QRS
As Vp
R wave marker
is above a Pwave
Vs
As Vp
Leads are switched in the header
16. Implantation Procedure #2
The tracing shown below was recorded with the pacemaker in
the DDD mode, 4 V output on both atrial and ventricular
channels, base rate 60 ppm and AV delay 165 ms. What is the
problem if any?
Surface ECG
Marker
A IEGM
A : A pacing
V : V pacing
17. Implantation Procedure #2
Loss of V-capture, Patient is in a 2:1 heart block, need to recheck
the V lead position.
Loss of V
capture
A : A pacing
V : V pacing
Loss of V
capture
Loss of V
capture
Loss of V
capture
18. Implantation Procedure #3
The device is hooked up and the following ECG is
seen. Is this normal? If not, what is occurring?
A : A pacing
P : A Sensing
V : V Pacing
R : V Sensing
21. Pacemaker-Mediated Tachycardia
Initiated by a loss of AV synchrony
PVC most common cause
Atrial loss of capture
Atrial undersensing
PAC
Magnet removal
Retrograde P
Ventricular Channel Must Respond
PMT at Max Track Rate (or Slower)
22. How to terminate PMT
Place magnet
Change to VVI (Use programmer)
Program longer PVARP (Use programmer)
Use PMT termination algorithm (pacemaker function)
Retrograde P
PMT
terminated
Auto-Detect Algorithm
24. Implantation Procedure #4
1. A pacing and accompany with captured QRS, it indicated A lead
dislodge to ventricle.
2. No V captured waveform followed by V pacing spike due to ventricular
is in the physical refractory.
3. On occasion, AV delay is short because of safety pacing.
Short AV delay
(120 ms) : Safety
pacing
Normal AV
delay
Ap Vp Ap Vp Ap Vp Ap Vp Ap Vp
28. Bipolar
In-line Bipolar conductor construction
Two Coils
Will have several strands
Trifiler, Quadrafiler, 5 filer, etc.
Inner insulation
Two layers of Insulation
Outer insulation
Outer coil
(Anode)
Inner coil
(Cathode )
34. Loose Anchoring Sleeve
Lead allowed to “pull
back”
Traction at electrodetissue interface causes
high thresholds
Predispose to
dislodgment
Note loss of heel on leads
37. Tight Anchoring Sleeve
Leads from 4 different
mfg’s
Tight anchoring sleeve
pushes insulation
between conductor
coils “pseudofracture”
Areas of major stress
38. Pacemaker Lead Placement
Myocardial perforation (Pacemaker lead perforation rate:
0.1~0.8%, ICD lead perforation rate : 0.6~5.2%)
Placement in left ventricle via
Patent foramen ovale
Septal perforation
Arterial entry
Dislodgment: The most common complication( PAcemaker
Selection in Elderly : 2.2%)
Atrial dislodgment : 3%
Ventrical dislodgement : below 2%
Diaphragmatic stimulation
Directly - lead in cardiac vein
Directly - myocardial perforation
Indirectly - phrenic nerve stimulation
41. Chronic Venous Thrombosis
Superficial dilated veins
in upper extremity and
chest
Localized to side of
chest where
pacemaker is located
No specific treatment
July
2001
42. Superior Vena Cava Syndrome
Symptoms
Swelling of arms
Fullness in head &
neck
Increased JVP
Management
Anticoagulation
Surgical reconstruction
Lead explantation
Venoplasty &
Stent placement
“Beaver Syndrome”
43. Management of Pocket Hematoma
Observation and close
follow-up
Soft
Minimal to no
tenderness
Surgical evacuation
Tense pocket
threatening suture line
Weeping suture line
Severe pain
Immunocompromised
host
August
2001
46. Proper Location of Pulse Generator
Note the use of the
Cephalic Vein! Pocket
is then placed medial to
the incision on the
anterior chest wall.
Furman S, PACE 2001; 24: 1224-1227
47. Improper Location of Pulse Generator
If the pacemaker is
placed too lateral, it
will cause discomfort
every time the patient
rotates arm forward
Furman S, PACE 2001; 24: 1224-1227
49. Smoldering Pocket Infection with draining fistula
Presented 2 years post
implant
Eschar and draining
fistula at edge of incision,
surrounding erythema
Waxed and waned on
oral antibiotics
Local cultures were
negative
January 24, 2002
50. Chronic Smoldering Infection
Pulse Generator Explanted but Not Lead
Low grade pocket infection
Managed by explanting
pulse generator but leaving
lead in place
2 weeks of antibiotics
Initial good result
MUST remove all foreign
material from pocket
9 months post-PG explant
51. Pacemaker Extrusion
Clinical history: 61 year old
man implanted 9 months
previously for complete heart
block. Did not consider
follow-up to be necessary. Not
concerned when device began
to show through the skin.
Only when it fell out did he
call his physician. Cultures
grew Staph epidermidis.
Unknown if a primary infection
caused the erosion or the site
was secondarily infected once
it was open to the skin.
Parsonnet V, Circulation 2000; 102:
52. Electromagnetic Interference
Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) involves electrical
and/or magnetic signals in the environment or arising
from the body that impact the normal function of the
implanted pacing system.
53. Community Based EMI Influences
Microwave ovens
Cellular telephones
Electronic article surveillance
Power stations
Arc welding equipment
CB and Ham Radio equipment