Delivering assessment through iPads: Initial reflection on feasibility
1. www.le.ac.uk
Delivering assessment through iPads: Initial
reflection on feasibility
Mark Hamilton, Laura Mongan, Terese Bird, Sarah Bulman, Alex
Thornber & Robert Norman
ASME Scientific Meeting July 2015 Edinburgh
2.
3. Opportunities
⢠Next step of maximising
effectiveness of iPad-as-digital-
platform
⢠More interactive assessments
⢠Improved feedback experience
(NSS scores)
4. Pilot
⢠2x written formative assessments
⢠Mixture of SBAs & SAQs
⢠Formative 1 (n=214) formative 2
(n=171)
⢠Lecture theatre venue
⢠Follow-up survey (n=105)
6. Strengths
⢠Easy to set up an exam
⢠All students completed the exams (using an iPad)
⢠Worked well in confined space with no wifi
⢠Detailed exam analytics + rationale given to students
7.
8. Weaknesses
⢠Occasional glitches in software
⢠Around 2-3% required help
⢠Needed alternative iPad
⢠Some reports of questions âfreezingâ
⢠Delay in exam upload
âGuided
Access,
triple-clickâŚâ
10. I found the user interface of the SofTestM app during the exam to be easy to use.
11. Overall, compared to paper-based exams, how did you find the process of taking the
exam on the iPad?
12. I am comfortable with the prospect of taking end of semester assessments via iPad in
the future.
13. Feasibility
⢠Cost is acceptable
⢠Digital platform already exists
⢠Relatively few practical problems/user friendly
⢠Provides lots of exam data
14. Feasibility
⢠Winning hearts and minds
⢠User experience predominantly and
generously negative!
⢠General concerns over e-assessment
15. What now?
⢠Hope to use ExamSoft in a regular formative fashion
⢠Present student feedback back to students
⢠What else can we learn from this?
⢠Student ownership
⢠Revisit summative assessments in future
Hinweis der Redaktion
Why do we want to deliver assessment through iPads?