56. Comprehensive
Individuals &
Documentation
Interactions
Working Software
Processes & Tools
Customer
Collaboration
Contract
Negotiation
Following a plan
Responding to
Change
Thursday 19 March 2009
57. The Agile Manifesto
Individuals &
Over Processes & Tools
Interactions
Comprehensive
Over
Working Software
Documentation
Customer Contract
Over
Collaboration Negotiation
Responding to
Over Following a plan
Change
Thursday 19 March 2009
90. QA Complete
In QA
Dev Complete
In Dev
Ready for Dev
In Analysis
Thursday 19 March 2009
91. Our Card
Wall!
QA Complete
In QA
Dev Complete
In Dev
Ready for Dev
In Analysis
Thursday 19 March 2009
92. Burn Up Chart
Scope Planned Actual Projected
Thursday 19 March 2009
93. Burn Up Chart
Scope Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
37.5
0
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10 I11 I12 I13
Thursday 19 March 2009
94. Burn Up Chart
Scope Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
37.5
0
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10 I11 I12 I13
Thursday 19 March 2009
95. Burn Up Chart
Scope Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
37.5
0
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10 I11 I12 I13
Thursday 19 March 2009
96. Burn Up Chart
Scope Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
37.5
0
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10 I11 I12 I13
Thursday 19 March 2009
97. Burn Up Chart
Scope Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
37.5
0
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10 I11 I12 I13
Thursday 19 March 2009
98. Burn Up Chart
Scope Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
37.5
0
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10 I11 I12 I13
When we planned
to finish
Thursday 19 March 2009
99. Burn Up Chart
Scope Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
When we
should finish
37.5
0
I1 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 I10 I11 I12 I13
When we planned
to finish
Thursday 19 March 2009
100. Burn Down Chart
Planned Actual Projected
Thursday 19 March 2009
101. Burn Down Chart
Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
37.5
0
Day1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9
Thursday 19 March 2009
102. Burn Down Chart
Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
37.5
0
Day1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9
Thursday 19 March 2009
103. Burn Down Chart
Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
37.5
0
Day1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9
Thursday 19 March 2009
104. Burn Down Chart
Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
37.5
0
Day1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9
Thursday 19 March 2009
105. Burn Down Chart
Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
37.5
0
Day1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9
When we planned
to finish
Thursday 19 March 2009
106. Burn Down Chart
Planned Actual Projected
150
112.5
75
When we
should finish
37.5
0
Day1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9
When we planned
to finish
Thursday 19 March 2009
107. Tips for
Implementation
Thursday 19 March 2009
108. Analysis Development Management
Thursday 19 March 2009
111. e
een
r Gr
e
nnif
Je
n&
a
tellm
S
rew
And the
n,
ctio
ce fun h.
pla
d-re lace
ent rc e
h-an -rep tive sea he sam
m c
age nd
sear ch-a e-sensi s t e user
n in ha
t Ma ensitivity the se do a cas t which nt. If th urned
ar
ojec
Pr re ty t
ex
es
s to fe
t
ase k
any e is dif ensitivi t where
nvo
re ion
-4: C user i the opt
twa tch
of s s en
a ca
FR -
case
ill m cum
ed S
ve the
a
st gi h w ven if ne with the do
li en
Wh are mu
App inal
earc m, e in
e do orig
he s ext
r
w
soft lt, t arch te is to b atch t erm. ces by the
a
u repl fied
e
defa rch only m arch t
Nam se
ents By s as the the sea are s:
i
irem oftw xt spec follow
e
will of the s
Requirements
equ r e s t te
t
lette tes tha ftware that t as
n th
R
ent
en x
e
al te
ca so , wh cem
o cem
indi en the ntical t lace e repla e origin e repla
rep
th e
on, se is id th
of th
th
and hen ent
ith
arch ent w he case rcase, t
e ca acem
se
th
repl
pe case.
t
g a docum tains p the
all u upper
in
Dur n the
specification
re then the
was
are and
ase, .
ext d in all
xt i e softw
case nt text
erc se
al t erte
te r
w ca
igin ins
, th ppe
ll lo e
user r
e or ter u acem
as a lowe
e
If th must b arac the repl
xt w in all r of
ch n
al te ed lette
text irst
•
rigin e insert first ust be
e
he f ase, th
eo ad t erc the
If th must b m
xt h here text
w
al te cters lo well. e (w ement
xt
•
igin ara
te cas lac
s
e or se a rted
nce e rep
h
If th of the c t this ca inse
ente
as s then th d be
t c
•
res t refle l
xt w ), shou r.
al te rcase
mus text
rigin s uppe e case. e
ent the us nts,
eo acem by eme
i
If th word sentenc repl ecified quir
each rted in
e
, the as sp
• ce r
ases man
inse er c e that w rfor the
th pe asy
all o he cas h as w e itions
In g t (suc e ho ond
usin clud
tion
•
are
c
enta s in pected
rch ents
tic
nts
ea plem teris n unex quirem
8: S
or im
e
UC- ac
char al re
irem
whe
sign hese ehaves unction .
e de them
u k. T it b
th
eq
f
ying must
or
s on non
al R
ill w l
t ntif are
ces wel . (The ”.)
rain
eren qua
re w
onst
ion
ow e
s
Ref ftwa , and h system ttribute e by e softw disk, th
se c .
nct
so on
po
l the ble it is out the uality a is d hich th se on ples of
s im raints)
nfu wel elia
ent nst s
, thi ts w ba
ab exam
q
irem data
No ften
how are
cts
co r n
requ design e. O sureme ize of a rted are
out es, how se aspe “softw
nal ibl
ab r oss c mea
s t
tio rds or tion t execu fine the ents” o m s suppo lity
func as p imu qua
ecta
a ifi s
Non y stand exp uickly i ents de equirem isely e spec he max nt user and ments
prec rovid
licit ance quire
lit ,t rre
r
q m
qua imp , how require avioral d as task ncu orm
p e
ave fine hould form a r of co r. perf ional r
se h
l
rs h e
-be
ou na be d ents s o per e
mbe ehavio f th funct
Use are is t functio as “non ould irem all o as
e nu its b
et
on ts sh
w t tak d th
soft The n erred to fine
qu te
e
men nal re it mus ble, an chang o de templa
. f ht
ire
e
aris times re requ functio econds e availa t do not oug same
, en the
nal
e n s
som ents
b ent:
t bu
e no
ctio r of ust
nfun ble, th numbe stem m plemen irem an use quirem
equ ts c
no lace
i e
The e poss ximum ay a sy lr lr
m
ust i ona rep
ona en kly
nd-
ncti quirem nfuncti
re m
her he ma rd quic
-a
pe a fu
W re.
urs he softw arch
non nal re f a no rch
.T ftwa
t a
o se
le
mee er of h hat t a se
ultip functio mple o for e so MB
m
ints g th
rfor
t in m Non
b
num rements xa a 3 ed
usin
stra t pe
onta an e mus
con
ill c ftware. shows void on lac
ui
nce
req e ep
ill a ed
atur
nw be r ms
orm
rma
e so e
ctio tabl rs w
e fe perf ms to der 500 at
erfo
is se s of th owing , use
plac lace ch ter ke un 2000
7: P
Th ute -re gh
l u
d
NF-
fol -rep sear
eno
h-an
b
attri e). The ta
fast -and ows
earc ust
r
not arch haracte term m t Wind
he s
ov h is se
(ab T
sof
tive ty 30-c search
c
sear icro
ensi
If a -ins th twen aracter ning M
ame ase
N run
i h
A c ent w nt 30-c
y
mar III
Sum cum iffere entium
le do a d
ona zP
Rati ts with 700mh d.
men
ire 4!
a
u a
on CPU lo
Req
50%
!
.com
ene
re
n-g
lma
stel
ww.
://w
http
Thursday 19 March 2009
