Real Surat Development Seminar 2011 (RSDS-11); Ketan Kapadia, MD, Panora Infrastructure Project Management

2. PANORA infrastructure

3. PANORA infrastructure
project management engineering quantity survey

4. Building Project Leadership
Project Management and Implementation

5. About Panora

6. About Panora
organisational structure

7. About Panora
a brief profile
¡ Panora Infrastructure was established in December 1995, having
derived its existence from the Architectural Group of K. G. Kapadia PANORA consortium
& Company which was founded in 1965 in Mumbai
¡ Provides services in Project Management, Quantity Survey (QS)
and Engineering.
¡ With offices located in Mumbai, Pune, Hyderabad and London, Panora PANORA infrastructure
employs a dedicated group of more than 80 professionals; with Senior project management
Management having been with the firm for more than 10 years
¡ Worked with numerous architects and engineers of international
repute including DP Architects, Palmer & Turner, WSP (UK), etc. ARKK BOX India
consulting
¡ Successfully executed over 150 projects with a built-up area of about MEP consultants
15 million sq.ft. across India, USA, Cameroon, UK, Dubai PANORA BOX
Associates, UK
¡ Arkk Consulting, a partnership for Utilities and MEP Design Engineering
was setup in 2007
¡ Box – India, a project based strategic partnership was setup in 2009 for
QS and Cost Management Services with Box Associates, UK with a
focus on Hotels and Hospitality sector.

8. About Panora
key personnel
Ketan Kapadia
Panora Infrastructure - Managing Director / Arkk Consulting – Partner
B.E. (Civil), Mumbai University
M. Engg (Structures), Cornell University, USA
MBA (Finance & Operations), University of Pittsburgh, USA
Over 15 years experience in Design Engineering and Project Management in India and abroad. Skills include
Execution Planning, Contract Negotiations and Contract Structuring. Has significant Experience in various
aspects of managing complex projects.
Rajendra N Joshi
Panora Infrastructure - Executive Director / Arkk Consulting - Partner
B.E. (Mechanical), Mumbai University
A MEP Specialist with over 20 years of experience in Design Engineering and Project Management in India
and abroad.
As Design Engineering Head (West Zone) at VOLTAS for 14 years, worked on numerous complex projects
for hotels, hospitals and public projects. Worked as General Manager (Projects) in South Africa and
implemented 4 major hospital projects. Currently working on Taj Gateway at Vashi, Bhandup, Hyderabad,
Pan Card Hotel Kolkatta, Chariot Hotels Puri, Deora's Jodhpur.
Primarily responsible for the managing the Utilities Design Coordination and related QA / QC issues.

9. Significant Projects

10. Commercial
significant projects
Kotak Mahindra Bank 500,000 Office Interiors
Enam Finance, BKC 200,000 Construction and Office Interiors
BNP Paribas, Goregaon 87,000 Office Interiors
Ichibaan Honda, BKC 200,000 Construction & Common Area Interiors
Leo Burnett, Parel 35,000 Construction and interiors
Nicholas Piramal, Parel 150,000 Office interiors at Peninsula
Linkway Honda Powai 100,000 Construction and Interiors Workshop
Indian Card Clothing 100,000 Construction & Common area Interiors
KMC, Hyderabad 150,000 Construction and Interiors
Fort House, Mumbai 150,000 Construction & Common Area Interiors
All areas in square feet

11. Commercial
significant projects
Grand Palladium Kotak Mahindra Bank Headquarters
Kalina, Mumbai Dindoshi, Goregaon, Mumbai
Offices and Mission Critical Data Centre
Commercial Offices
Total BUA 500,000 sq.ft. (62,000 sq.ft. x 8 levels)
Total BUA 200,000 sft
Duration 2008 - 09
Duration 2007 - 2009
Consultants WSP (UK)

12. Retail
significant projects
Crossroads at Tardeo 250,000
SOBO Central at Tardeo 250,000
CR2 Mall at Nariman Point 150,000
Elpro Mall at Chinchawad, Pune 725,000
Piramyd 60,000 (7 locations across India)
Shoppers Stop Pune, Aurangabad, Chennai, Mysore, Ghatkopar
Blue Foods + Pan Foods 10 locations across India
D Mart Kalyan, Virar, Pune (Aundh)
KMC Retail Hyderabad 100,000
McDonalds Multiple Locations
All areas in square feet

13. Retail
significant projects
Crossroads CR2
Haji Ali, Mumbai Nariman Point, Mumbai
Shopping Mall Shopping Mall, Multiplex, Car Park
Total BUA 250,000 sq.ft. Total BUA 250,000 sq.ft.
Duration 1996 - 1999 Duration 2001 - 2004
Renovated in 2009 as SOBO Central

14. Residential
significant projects
Balkrishna Tires Ltd. BKT Bhuj BKT (Siyaram Group) 400,000
Prakash Mirror Residential + Rehab, Tardeo Anchor Group 700,000
Luxury Residential Ravi, Breach Candy Anchor Group 200,000
Sagardeep Residential, Walkeshwar Anchor Group 200,000
Luxury Residential Tower + Rehab, Worli Saumya Buildcon 700,000
MIG Residential Tower, Parel Rohan Lifescapes 80,000
Rehab Building, Bhuleshwar Rohan Lifescapes 80,000
9A Luxury Residential Tower, Breach Candy Khemchand Kothari 200,000
Vasant Vilas - Single User Residence Kishore Dalal 20,000
Single User Residence at Laburnam Road Jaydev Mody 25,000
All areas in square feet

15. Residential
significant projects
Luxury Residential Tower Vasant Vilas
Worli, Mumbai Babulnath, Mumbai
250m high. Rehab tower + school Single User Residence
Total BUA 700,000 sq.ft. Total BUA 20,000 sq.ft.
Duration 2008 - 2014 (scheduled)

16. Industrial
significant projects
Cinpharm at Douala, Cameroun Large vol. Parenterals, Betalactum, Gen. Form.
ZYG Pharma, Pithampur, Indore Steroidal / Non St. Ointments, Lotions, Cream
Omni-actives, Hinjewadi Nutraceuticals
Red River Pharma LLC, Louisiana, USA General Formulations
ADF Foods Ltd., Nadiad Frozen Foods Factory
Balkrishna Tires Ltd., Dombivali Tyre Moulding Unit
Cable Corporation of India, Nashik Cable Manufacturing unit
Siyaram Ltd., Tarapur Textile Manufacturing Unit
Siyaram Ltd., Daman Textile Manufacturing Unit
Warehouse Complex, Bhandup Steel Suppliers Ltd.

17. Industrial
significant projects
Autohangar Mercedes Cable Corporation of India
Mumbai, Nagpur Sinnar, Nashik
State-of-th-art automotive showroom, workshop Cable Manufacturing Unit
Total BUA 5,000 - 130,000 sq.ft.

18. Hospitality
significant projects
Taj Gateway Thunderbird
Kolhapur Daman, Gujarat
4 star hotel with 120 keys 5-star hotel and Casino with 180 keys
Total BUA 200,000 sq.ft. Total BUA 360,000 sq.ft.
Duration 24 months Duration 12 months

19. Project Management

20. Project Management
an overview of the role of a PMC
Design Development Handover to
1 and Tendering 2 Construction Stage 3 Operations
Architecture, Engineering Release of Construction Prepare and complete Snag List
Design and Budgetary Studies Documents
Collate all As Built Drawings and
Coordination Meeting with the Mobilization of Contractors and Handover Documents
Design Team and Decisions with establish Site Management
Clients Processes Final Bills and No Claims
Certificates from Contractors
Structuring of contracts and Construction Management
Finalize Specifications Procedures Hand over various aspects of
the project to operations team
Pre-qualification of Tenderers Cost & Quality control
Procedures
Tendering Process
Pre-tender Meetings Bill Checking, Certification and
Float Tender Contract Management
Negotiations and Award

21. Case Study 01
shuttering systems
aluminum v/s conventional

22. Aluminum Formwork
the future of construction
Advantages of Aluminum Formwork for the super structure of the tower
Faster Speed of Construction
Reduces internal brickwork and plastering
Superior Quality of in-situ casting of structure and transverse walls in a continuous operation
Increased Carpet area by 2-3% by avoiding internal plastering
Limitations of Aluminum Formwork
The system does not allow for modifications to the structure and floor layouts
High initial capital cost. Employing the aluminum formwork for greater number of repetitions helps
distribute the investment and reduces the effective cost of the build.

23. Aluminum Formwork
the future of construction

24. Aluminum Formwork
the future of construction
Feasibility of Aluminum Shuttering an Analytical Comparison
2 residential projects analysed to ascertain the viability of Aluminum Shuttering
Project A
9 Towers, 20 storeys each + 2 level Podium
Project B
4 Towers, 46 storeys each + 3 level Podium

25. Aluminum Formwork
the future of construction
Project A
9 Towers, 20 storeys each + 2 level Podium
Scenario 1
Build using Aluminum Shuttering
C D E F G
B A CLUB I H Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
The build is proposed in 3 phases, using 3 Sets of Aluminum Shuttering after calculating
the viability of the repetitions.
This programme might prove to be inflexible.

26. Aluminum Formwork
the future of construction
Project A
9 Towers, 20 storeys each + 2 level Podium
Scenario 2
Build using Conventional Shuttering
C D E F G
B A CLUB I H
Phase 1
Phase 2
Using Conventional Shuttering the towers could be built in 2 phases making this
programme more flexible.
Completion of the RCC casting earlier allows for finishing each tower earlier

27. Aluminum Formwork
the future of construction
Task Aluminum Shuttering Conventional Shuttering
Design Coordination and Tendering 3 months 3 months
Construction 37 months 33 months
Handover 2 months 2 months
Total Completion Time 42 months 38 months (-4 months)
Flexibility for modifications in Design Relatively Inflexible Relatively Flexible
Finish of RCC surface Relatively Superior Ply shuttering required
External Plaster Not Required Required
Internal Plaster Not Required Required
Brickwork Comparatively Reduced Required
NOTE:
Though individual building time-frame using aluminum shuttering may be lower, the overall project time-frame
could be lower in case of conventional shuttering due to the flexible phasing programme.

28. Aluminum Formwork
the future of construction
Phase 4
Podium B
Project B
4 Towers, 46 storeys each + 3 level Podium
Phase 3 D
Podium A
C
Phase 2
B
A
Phase 1

29. Aluminum Formwork
the future of construction
Floor Rise Level 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 terrace total
Slab Aluminium 22 15 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 500
Cycle Formwork
Time Conventional 35 20 15 15 15 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
(days) 15 682
Formwork
Aluminum Shuttering
Average Cycle time per slab is 10 days.
The first slab requires 20-25 days for the initial assembly.
Total time for RCC is 500 days
Conventional Shuttering
Average Cycle time per slab is 14 days.
The first slab requires 30-35 days for the initial assembly.
Total time for RCC is 682 day
Would require almost 6 months more

30. Aluminum Formwork
the future of construction
CONCLUSION
Project B is very well suited for using Aluminum Shuttering based on the Phasing program
as required by the Clients and the overall financial viability of the System.
For Project A the conventional shuttering system is more suited due to its additional
flexibility which allows for the project to get completed 4 months earlier as compared to
Aluminum Shuttering.

31. Case Study 02
building with structural steel

32. Grand Palladium
building with structural steel
Commercial Offices for GMS Construction
Kalina, BKC, Mumbai
Architect Kamal Malik
Engineers WSP, UK
Total BUA 200,000 sq.ft.
Duration 2007 - 2009
LEEDS applied for Gold Rating

33. Grand Palladium
building with structural steel
A unique project designed by
Architect Kamal Malik and
engineered by WSP, UK uses High
Yield Strength Structural Steel
from CORUS for the main members
and the skin truss supporting the
cantilevered slabs at all levels. The
façade is clad with KALZIP.
Major challenges at GMS included
managing the Design Process which
was extremely complex, planning
logistics of building with steel
within a busy urban area in the
shortest possible time.
2200 MT of High Yield
strength Structural Steel
was used.
Material supplied primarily by
CORUS and JSW.

34. Grand Palladium
building with structural steel
Advantages of Structural Steel in Architecture
Maintains its strength indefinitely- does not deteriorate with age like timber and concrete, provided
its surface is protected from corrosion.
Very strong and flexible. The best material for bridges and skyscrapers.
Can be recycled.
Structures can be prefabricated in large sections, and lifted into place with cranes and bolted
together- buildings can be erected quickly.
Versatile- Radical architecture is possible using steel.
Drawbacks of Structural Steel in Architecture
Heavy and thus expensive to transport, susceptible to corrosion.
Has a high expansion rate in changing temperatures, and this must be allowed for in the
engineering. In conditions of repeated stress and changing temperatures, can suffer fatigue and
cracks, and more corrosion.
Energy intensive to produce.

35. Grand Palladium
build sequence planning
Typical Build Planning sheet
F a b ric a tio n T a rg e t D a te E re c tio n S ta tu s
SR LATE S T Tonnage T a rg e t F o r
D R G N O. T IT L E Q ty F o r R e c e ip t A t
NO REV (K g .) S ta tu s E re c tio n (R 2 ) R e c e ip t
S c h e d u le d S ite . E re c te d O n .
(R e c e iv e d ) D a te .
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il o f
1 S T E -1 4 B 1 1 2 0 1 3 0 .3 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 2 -O c t-0 8 2 7 -O c t-0 8 1 4 -O c t-0 8
Beam
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il o f
2 S T E -1 4 B 1 1 5 0 1 8 0 .2 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 2 -O c t-0 8 2 7 -O c t-0 8 1 4 -O c t-0 8
Beam
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il o f
3 S T E -1 4 B 1 1 6 0 1 3 3 .0 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 2 -O c t-0 8 2 7 -O c t-0 8
Beam
1 S T E -1 4 B 1 3 R e c e iv e d . 1 2 -S e p -0 8
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il o f
2 S T E -1 4 B 5 R e c e iv e d . 1 5 -S e p -0 8 2 0 -S e p -0 8
Beam
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il o f
3 S T E -1 4 B 8 2 0 1 8 1 .5 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 1 2 -S e p -0 8 1 7 -S e p -0 8 1 6 -S e p -0 8
Beam
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il o f
4 S T E -1 4 B 8 3 0 1 7 7 .1 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 6 -S e p -0 8 1 -O c t-0 8 1 1 -O c t-0 8
Beam
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il o f
5 S T E -1 4 B 9 0 0 1 5 5 .4 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 6 -S e p -0 8 1 -O c t-0 8
Beam
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il o f
6 S T E -1 4 B 9 1 0 1 8 3 .7 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 7 -S e p -0 8 1 2 -S e p -0 8
Beam
7 S T E -1 4 C 1 2 -2 R e c e iv e d . 2 5 -O c t-0 8 3 0 -O c t-0 8
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il of
8 S T E -1 4 F R 1 1 1 1 5 5 0 .0 0 ------ R e c e iv e d 2 9 -S e p -0 8
F ra m e (2 S hts )
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il of
9 S T E -1 4 F R 1 4 0 1 6 6 .2 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 6 -S e p -0 8 1 -O c t-0 8 1 1 -O c t-0 8
F ra m e
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il of
10 S T E -1 4 F R 1 8 0 1 9 7 .3 0 ------ R e c e iv e d . 2 6 -S e p -0 8 1 -O c t-0 8 1 1 -O c t-0 8
F ra m e
F a b ric a tio n d e ta il of
11 S T E -1 5 B 4 1 0 1 4 3 4 .1 ------ R e c e iv e d . 1 0 -O c t-0 8
Beam

36. Grand Palladium
erection sequence simulation

37. Grand Palladium
erection sequence simulation

38. Grand Palladium
erection sequence simulation

39. Grand Palladium
erection sequence simulation

40. Grand Palladium
erection sequence simulation

41. Grand Palladium
erection sequence simulation

42. Grand Palladium
erection sequence simulation

43. Grand Palladium
erection sequence simulation

44. Grand Palladium
build sequence

45. Grand Palladium
build sequence

46. Grand Palladium
build sequence

47. Grand Palladium
building with structural steel

48. Thank You
Contact
Ketan Kapadia ketank@panora-india.com M +91-9820029010
mumbai
4 sumer kendra, pandurang budhkar marg, worli, mumbai 400018 india
t +91-22-40250100 / 24961071-2 f +91-22-24960489
www.panora-india.com
mumbai pune hyderabad london