SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 67
1www.exploreHR.org
MeasuringMeasuring
ROI ofROI of
TrainingTraining
2www.exploreHR.org
AgendaAgenda
1. Measuring the Effectiveness of Training
Program
2. Measuring ‘Return on Investment’ of Training
3. Enhancing the Effectiveness and ROI of
Training
If you find this presentation useful, please consider telling others
about our site (www.exploreHR.org)(www.exploreHR.org)
3www.exploreHR.org
Measuring the Effectiveness ofMeasuring the Effectiveness of
Training ProgramTraining Program
4www.exploreHR.org
Training
Need
Analysis
Training
Objectives
Training
Delivery
Training
Evaluation
Training ProcessTraining Process
What are
the training
needs for
this person
and/or job?
Objective
should be
measurable
and
observable
Techniques
include on-
the-job-
training,
action
learning, etc.
Measure
reaction,
learning,
behavior,
and results
5www.exploreHR.org
The Four Levels of EvaluationThe Four Levels of Evaluation
Level 1 - Reaction
Level 2 - Learning
Level 3 – Behavior
Application
Level 4 – Business
Impact
Four LevelsFour Levels
of Trainingof Training
EffectivenessEffectiveness
6www.exploreHR.org
Test the trainees to determine if
they learned the principles,
skills, and facts they were to
learn.
Evaluate trainees’ reactions to
the program. Did they like the
program? Did they think it
worthwhile?
Level 1 -Level 1 -
ReactionReaction
Level 2 -Level 2 -
LearningLearning
The Four Levels of EvaluationThe Four Levels of Evaluation
7www.exploreHR.org
What final results were achieved in terms of the
training objectives previously set? Did the number
of customer complaints about employee drop? Did
the reject rate improve? Was turnover reduced,
and so forth.
Ask whether the trainees’ behavior on the job
changed because of the training program. For
example, are employees in the store’s complaint
department more courteous toward disgruntled
customers than previously?
Level 3 –Level 3 –
BehaviorBehavior
ApplicationApplication
Level 4 –Level 4 –
BusinessBusiness
ImpactImpact
The Four Levels of EvaluationThe Four Levels of Evaluation
8www.exploreHR.org
Value ofValue of
InformationInformation
Frequency ofFrequency of
UseUse
Difficulty ofDifficulty of
AssessmentAssessment
Level
I. Reaction
II. Learning
III. Behavior
IV. Results
The Four Levels of EvaluationThe Four Levels of Evaluation
Least
valuable
Most
valuable
Frequent
Infrequent
Easy
Difficult
9www.exploreHR.org
Level 1 - ReactionLevel 1 - Reaction
Evaluate trainees’
reactions to the program:
Did they like the program?
Did they like the
facilitators?
Did they like the training
accommodation and
facilities?
Level 1 -Level 1 -
ReactionReaction
10www.exploreHR.org
Guidelines for Evaluating ReactionGuidelines for Evaluating Reaction
1. Determine what you want to find out
2. Design a form that will quantify reactions
3. Encourage written comments and suggestions
4. Get 100 percent immediate response
5. Get honest response
6. Develop acceptable standards
7. Measure reactions against standards, and take
appropriate action
8. Communicate reaction as appropriate
11www.exploreHR.org
Please give us your frank reactions and comments. They will help us to evaluate
this program and improve future programs.
Program :
Facilitator :
1. How do you rate the subject (interest, benefit, etc)
a. Excellent
b. Very Good
c. Good
d. Fair
e. Poor
2. How do you rate the facilitator? (knowledge, ability to deliver and communicate?)
a. Excellent
b. Very Good
c. Good
d. Fair
e. Poor
3. How do you rate the facilities? (comfort, convinience, etc)
a. Excellent
b. Very Good
c. Good
d. Fair
e. Poor
4. What would have improved the program?
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
Sample of
Reaction
Form
12www.exploreHR.org
Level 2 - LearningLevel 2 - Learning
Measuring learning means
determining one or more of
the following :
• What knowledge was
learned?
• What skills were
developed or improved?
• What attitudes were
changed?
Level 2 -Level 2 -
LearningLearning
13www.exploreHR.org
Guidelines for Evaluating LearningGuidelines for Evaluating Learning
1. Use a control group if practical
2. Evaluate knowledge, skills and/or attitudes both
before and after the program
3. Use a paper-and-pencil test to measure knowledge
4. Use a performance test to measure skills
5. Get 100 percent immediate response
6. Use the results of evaluation to take appropriate
action
14www.exploreHR.org
Guidelines for Evaluating LearningGuidelines for Evaluating Learning
Experimental Group Control Group
Pre Test Score 45 46
Post Test Score 55 48
Gain 10 2
Pretest and Posttest Scores on Change Management Training
Example :
15www.exploreHR.org
Level 3 – Behavior ApplicationLevel 3 – Behavior Application
• The frequency of
application of new
skills/knowledge/
attitudes (on the job)
• The effectiveness of the
skills/knowledge/
attitudes (as applied on
the job)
Level 3 –Level 3 –
BehaviorBehavior
ApplicationApplication
16www.exploreHR.org
Guidelines for Evaluating LearningGuidelines for Evaluating Learning
1. Use a control group if practical
2. Allow time for behavior change and application to take
place
3. Evaluate both before and after the program if practical
4. Survey and/or interview one or more of the following :
trainees, their immediate supervisor, their subordinates,
and others who often observe their behavior
5. Get 100 percent response or a sampling
6. Repeat the evaluation at appropriate times
7. Consider cost versus benefits
17www.exploreHR.org
Example of Survey to Measure Behavior Application
Understanding and Motivating
1. Trying to understand my subordinates 5 4 3 2 1
2. Listening to my subordinates 5 4 3 2 1
3. Praising good work 5 4 3 2 1
4. Talking with subordinates about
their family and personal interests
5. Asking my subordinates for their ideas 5 4 3 2 1
6. Applying "Management by Walking Around" 5 4 3 2 1
Time and energy spent after the prgram
compared to time and energy spent before
the program
5 4 3 2 1
Instruction:
The objective of this questionnaire is to determine the extent to which those who
attended the recent program on Leadership have applied the principles and techniques
that they learned there to the job.
Circle the answer that you consider appropriate for each question.
5 = Much more 4 = More 3 = Same 2 = Less 1 = Much less
18www.exploreHR.org
Level 4 – Business ResultsLevel 4 – Business Results
• Indicate the extent to which you
think this program has
influenced each of these
measures in your work unit,
department, or business unit:
• Productivity
• Quality
• Customer Response Time
• Cost Control
• Employee Satisfaction
• Customer Satisfaction
• Other
Level 4 –Level 4 –
BusinessBusiness
ResultsResults
19www.exploreHR.org
Guidelines for Evaluating LearningGuidelines for Evaluating Learning
1. Use a control group if practical
2. Allow time for results to be achieved
3. Measure both before and after the program if practical
4. Repeat the evaluation at appropriate times
5. Consider cost versus benefits
6. Be satisfied with evidence if proof is not possible
20www.exploreHR.org
Performance IndicatorsPerformance Indicators
HARD DATA INDICATORS
• Downtime duration
• Number of defect products
• Sales volume
• Production unit
• Customer satisfaction index
• Response time to orders
• Number of accidents at work
• Others
21www.exploreHR.org
Performance IndicatorsPerformance Indicators
SOFT DATA INDICATORS (intangible impacts)
• Job satisfaction
• Conducive working relationship
• Effective communication
• Stress rate
• Quality in decision-making
22www.exploreHR.org
Example : Measuring Training ResultsExample : Measuring Training Results
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
Program : TQMTQM
TrainingTraining
Results after 33
months ofmonths of
training,training, number
of defects
dropped to 80
units/day
120 units
80 units
Before trainingBefore training After trainingAfter training
23www.exploreHR.org
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
Example : Measuring Training ResultsExample : Measuring Training Results
Program :
Sales TrainingSales Training
Results after 33
months trainingmonths training,
number of sales
per salesman
increase to 30
units/month.
20 units
30 units
Before trainingBefore training After trainingAfter training
24www.exploreHR.org
MeasuringMeasuring
Return on Investment ofReturn on Investment of
TrainingTraining
25www.exploreHR.org
Level 5 : Return on Investment of TrainingLevel 5 : Return on Investment of Training
Level 1 - Reaction
Level 2 - Learning
Level 3 – Behavior
Application
Level 4 –
Business Impact
Level 5 – Return
on Investment of
Training
26www.exploreHR.org
Criteria for Selecting Programs for LevelsCriteria for Selecting Programs for Levels
4 and 5 Evaluation4 and 5 Evaluation
• Importance of the program in meeting the
organization’s goals
• Cost of the program
• Visibility of the program
• Size of the target audience
• Extent of management interest
27www.exploreHR.org
Benefits of ROI of TrainingBenefits of ROI of Training
• Measure contribution
• Set priorities
• Focus on results
• Alter management perceptions of training
28www.exploreHR.org
ROI of Training ModelROI of Training Model
CollectCollect
DataData
Isolate theIsolate the
Effects ofEffects of
TrainingTraining
Convert DataConvert Data
to Monetaryto Monetary
ValuesValues
Calculate ROICalculate ROI
of Trainingof Training
TabulateTabulate
ProgramProgram
CostsCosts
IdentifyIdentify
IntangibleIntangible
BenefitsBenefits
29www.exploreHR.org
Net Program BenefitsNet Program Benefits
Program CostsProgram Costs
X 100X 100
Return on Investment FormulaReturn on Investment Formula
ROI =ROI =
ExampleExample ::
• Costs per program (25 participants)Costs per program (25 participants) $ 88,500$ 88,500
• Benefits per program (1st year)Benefits per program (1st year) $230,625$230,625
$ 230,625 – 88,500$ 230,625 – 88,500
$ 88,500$ 88,500
ROI =ROI = X 100X 100
ROI = 161 %ROI = 161 %
30www.exploreHR.org
Collecting DataCollecting Data
• Identify appropriate
performance indicators
• Develop a collection plan
CollectCollect
DataData
31www.exploreHR.org
Example of Performance IndicatorsExample of Performance Indicators
• Units produced
• Items sold
• Work backlog
• New accounts opened
• Productivity
• Inventory turnover
• Etc.
OutputOutput
• Equipment downtime
• Overtime
• Time to project
completion
• Processing time
• Repair time
• Lost time days
• Etc
TimeTime
32www.exploreHR.org
Example of Hard IndicatorsExample of Hard Indicators
• Unit costs
• Variable costs
• Overhead costs
• Operating costs
• Number of cost
reduction
• Etc.
CostCost
• Scrap
• Waste
• Rejects
• Error rates
• Rework
• Product defects
• Product failure
QualityQuality
33www.exploreHR.org
Example of Performance ResultsExample of Performance Results
• Some performance results after trainingSome performance results after training
program:program:
• Scrap was reduced from 11 % to 7.4 %
• Absenteeism was reduce from 7 % to 3.25 %
• The annual turnover rate was reduced from 30
% to 16 %
• Lost time accidents were reduced 95 %
34www.exploreHR.org
Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training
Methods toMethods to
Isolate theIsolate the
Effects ofEffects of
TrainingTraining
UsingUsing
Control GroupControl Group
TrendTrend
LinesLines
ParticipantsParticipants
EstimateEstimate
Supervisors ofSupervisors of
ParticipantsParticipants
EstimateEstimate
35www.exploreHR.org
UsingUsing
ControlControl
GroupGroup
• A control group arrangement can be
used to isolate training impact.
• With this strategy, one group
receives training, while another,
similar group does not receive
training.
• The difference in the performance of
the two groups is attributed to the
training program.
Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training
36www.exploreHR.org
TrendTrend
LinesLines
• Trend lines are used to project the
values of specific output variables if
training had not been undertaken.
• The projection is compared to the
actual data after training, and the
difference represents the estimate
impact of training.
Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training
37www.exploreHR.org
Trend Lines AnalysisTrend Lines Analysis
Jan Feb Mar Apr JulJunMay Aug
At the beginning of
May, a Sales training
Program session was
held
VolumeofSales
The
difference
represents
the estimate
impact of
training.
Trend Projection
Actual sales performance
38www.exploreHR.org
Participants andParticipants and
Supervisors ofSupervisors of
ParticipantsParticipants
Estimate ofEstimate of
Training’s ImpactTraining’s Impact
• This method rests on the assumption that
participants (and their supervisors) are
capable of estimating how much a
performance improvement is related to the
training program.
• Because their actions have produced the
improvement, participants (and their
supervisors) may have very accurate input
on the issue.
• They should know how much of the
change was caused by applying what they
have learned in the program.
Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training
39www.exploreHR.org
Participants andParticipants and
Supervisors ofSupervisors of
ParticipantsParticipants
Estimate ofEstimate of
Training’s ImpactTraining’s Impact
• Typical Questions to Estimate :Typical Questions to Estimate :
• What percent this improvement
can be attributed to the application
of skills/techniques/knowledge
gained in the training program?
• What confidence do you have in
this estimate, expresses as a
percent?
• What other factors contributed to
this improvement in performance?
Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training
40www.exploreHR.org
1 Training Program 50% 70%
2 Change in Procedures 10% 80%
3 Adjustment in Standards 10% 50%
4 Revision to Incentive Plan 20% 90%
5 Increased Management Attention 10% 50%
6 Other - -
Percent
Improvement
Caused by
Confidence
Expressed as
a Percent
Factors Which Influenced
ImprovementNo.
Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training
Example of a Participant’s EstimationExample of a Participant’s Estimation
The confidence percentage is multiplied by the
estimate (50 % x 70 %) to produce a usable traininga usable training
factor value of 35 %factor value of 35 %
41www.exploreHR.org
1 Training Program 50% 70%
2 Change in Procedures 10% 80%
3 Adjustment in Standards 10% 50%
4 Revision to Incentive Plan 20% 90%
5 Increased Management Attention 10% 50%
6 Other - -
Percent
Improvement
Caused by
Confidence
Expressed as
a Percent
Factors Which Influenced
ImprovementNo.
Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training
Example of a Participant’s EstimationExample of a Participant’s Estimation
• The confidence percentage is multiplied by the estimate (50 % x 70 %) to
produce a usable training factor value of 35 %
• This adjusted percentage is then multiplied by the actual amount of
improvement (post-program minus pre-program value) to isolate the portion
attributed to training
• The adjusted improvement is now ready for conversion to monetary values,
and used in the return on investment
42www.exploreHR.org
Converting Data to Monetary ValuesConverting Data to Monetary Values
ConvertingConverting
Data toData to
MonetaryMonetary
ValuesValues
• Steps to Convert Data to MonetarySteps to Convert Data to Monetary
ValuesValues
1. Focus on a unit of improvement
2. Determine a value of each unit
3. Calculate the change in performance
data
4. Determine an annual amount of change
5. Calculate the annual value of
improvement
43www.exploreHR.org
Steps to Convert Data to Monetary ValuesSteps to Convert Data to Monetary Values
An example to illustrate the steps to convert data to monetary values
1. Focus on unit
improvement
• One grievance reaching step two in the
four-step grievance resolution process
StepsSteps IllustrationIllustration
2. Determine a
value of each
unit
• Using internal experts, the cost of an
average grievance was estimated to be $
6,500 when considering time and direct
costs (V = $ 6,500)
44www.exploreHR.org
Steps to Convert Data to Monetary ValuesSteps to Convert Data to Monetary Values
3. Calculate the
change in
performance
data
• Six months after the program was completed,
total grievances per month reaching step two
declined by ten.
• Seven of the then grievance reductions were
related to the program as determined by
supervisors (isolating the effects of training)
StepsSteps IllustrationIllustration
4. Determine an
annual amount
for the change
• Using the six month value, seven per month
(grievance reductions), yields an annual
improvement of 84 (7 x 12 months)
45www.exploreHR.org
Steps to Convert Data to Monetary ValuesSteps to Convert Data to Monetary Values
5. Calculate the
annual value of
improvement
• Annual value = 84 x $ 6,500 = $ 546,000
StepsSteps IllustrationIllustration
46www.exploreHR.org
TabulatingTabulating
cost of thecost of the
programprogram
• Tabulating the costs involves
monitoring or developing all of the
related costs of the program
targeted for the ROI calculation.
Tabulating Cost of the ProgramTabulating Cost of the Program
47www.exploreHR.org
TabulatingTabulating
cost of thecost of the
programprogram
• Cost components that should be
included are :
• The cost to design and develop
the program
• The cost of all program materials
provided to each participant
• The cost for facilitator
• The cost of the facilities of the
training program
Tabulating Cost of the ProgramTabulating Cost of the Program
48www.exploreHR.org
TabulatingTabulating
cost of thecost of the
programprogram
• Cost components that should be
included are :
• Travel, lodging, and meal costs
for the participants
• Salaries, plus employee benefits
of the participants who attend
the training
• Administrative and overhead
costs of the training function,
allocated in some convenient
way
Tabulating Cost of the ProgramTabulating Cost of the Program
49www.exploreHR.org
An Example to Illustrate ROI analysisAn Example to Illustrate ROI analysis
Weeks after
training Trained Group Control Group
1 US$ 9,723 9,698
2 9,978 9,720
3 10,424 9,812
13 13,690 11,572
14 11,491 9,683
15 11,044 10,092
Average for weeks 12,075 10,449
13, 14, 15
Post Training Data
Average Weekly Sales
50www.exploreHR.org
An Example to Illustrate ROI analysisAn Example to Illustrate ROI analysis
Data US$
Average weekly sales
Trained Group 12,075
Control Group 10,449
Increase 1,626
Profit Contribution from Training 2 % 32.50
(Training Impacts)
Total weekly improvement 1,495
(32.5 x 46 participants)
Total annual benefit 71,760
($ 1,495 x 48 weeks)
Annualized Program Benefits
Note : 46 participants were still in job after 3 months
51www.exploreHR.org
An Example to Illustrate ROI analysisAn Example to Illustrate ROI analysis
Cost US$
Facilitation fees 11,250
Program materials : $ 35 x 46 1,610
Meals : 3 days x $ 28 x 46 1,288
Participant salaries plus benefit (35 %) 12,442
Coordination and Evaluation 2,500
Total Cost 29,090
Cost Summary : An Illustration
ROI (%):
$ 71,760 - $ 29,090
$ 29,090
146 %
x 100=
=
52www.exploreHR.org
Enhancing TrainingEnhancing Training
EffectivenessEffectiveness
53www.exploreHR.org
How Effective is Your Training Program?How Effective is Your Training Program?
Broad and Newstrom (1992) report studies have
shown less than 30% of what is30% of what is actually taughtactually taught
transfers to the job in a way that enhancestransfers to the job in a way that enhances
performanceperformance.
Source : Broad, M., & Newstrom, J. W. (1992). Transfer of training: Action packed
strategies to ensure high payoff from training investments. Reading, MA: Addison-
Wesley.
54www.exploreHR.org
Source of Barriers to TrainingSource of Barriers to Training TransferTransfer
• Lack of reinforcement on the job
• Interference from immediate (work) environment
• Nonsupportive organizational culture
• Trainees’ perception of impractical training programs
• Separation from the inspiration or support of the trainer
55www.exploreHR.org
The Transfer PartnershipThe Transfer Partnership
Trainee Trainee recognizes need for
new skills
Trainee Trainer
Trainer designs and/or
delivers learning experiences
Trainee Trainer
Manager supports learning
and application on the job
Manager
56www.exploreHR.org
The Transfer MatrixThe Transfer Matrix
Before During After
Manager
Trainer
Trainee
Time PeriodsRolePlayers
57www.exploreHR.org
ManagerManager
Before TrainingBefore Training
• Build transfer of training into supervisory
performance standards
• Collect baseline performance data
• Involve supervisors and trainees in needs
analysis process
• Involve trainees in program planning
• Brief trainees on the importance of the training
(course objective, content, process, and
application on the job)
• Review instructional content and materials
• Plan to participate in training sessions
• Encourage trainees attendance at all sessions
58www.exploreHR.org
TrainerTrainer
Before TrainingBefore Training
• Align the training plan with the organization's
strategic plan
• Systematically design instruction
• Provide proactive opportunities
• Design a peer coaching component for the
program and its follow-up activities
59www.exploreHR.org
TraineeTrainee
Before TrainingBefore Training
• Provide input into program planning
• Actively explore training options
• Participate in advance activities
60www.exploreHR.org
ManagerManager
During TrainingDuring Training
• Prevent interruptions
• Transfer work assignment to others
• Monitor attendance and attention to training
• Recognize trainee participation
• Participate in transfer action planning
• Review information on employee in training
• Plan assessment of transfer of new skills to the
job
61www.exploreHR.org
TrainerTrainer
During TrainingDuring Training
• Develop application-oriented objectives
• Answer the “WIIFM” question
• Manage the unlearning process
• Provide realistic work-related tasks
• Give individualized feedback
• Provide job performance aid
62www.exploreHR.org
TraineeTrainee
During TrainingDuring Training
• Maintain an ideas and application notebook
• Participate actively
• Form support groups
• Plan for applications
• Create behavioral contracts
63www.exploreHR.org
ManagerManager
After TrainingAfter Training
• Plan trainees’ reentry
• Provide opportunities to practice new skills
• Have trainees participate in transfer-related
decisions
• Reduce job pressures initially
• Give positive reinforcement
• Schedule trainee briefings for co-workers
• Set mutual expectations for improvement
• Arrange proactive (refresher) sessions
• Provide and support the use of job aids
64www.exploreHR.org
TrainerTrainer
After TrainingAfter Training
• Provide follow-up support
• Conduct evaluation surveys and provide
feedback
• Develop and administer recognition system
• Provide refresher/problem-solving sessions
65www.exploreHR.org
TraineeTrainee
After TrainingAfter Training
• Practice self-management
• Review training content and learned skills
• Develop a mentoring relationship
• Maintain contact with training ‘buddies’
66www.exploreHR.org
Recommended Further ReadingsRecommended Further Readings
1. Donald Kirkpatrick, Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels,
Berrett-Koehler Publishers
2. Jack J. Phillips and Patricia Phillips, In Action : Measuring Return On
Investment, American Society for Training & Development
3. Mary Broad and John Newstrom, Transfer of training: Action Packed
Strategies to Ensure High Payoff from Training Investments, Addison-
Wesley.
67www.exploreHR.org
End of MaterialEnd of Material

More Related Content

What's hot

Measuring the Effectiveness of Training - Myth or Reality?
Measuring the Effectiveness of Training - Myth or Reality?Measuring the Effectiveness of Training - Myth or Reality?
Measuring the Effectiveness of Training - Myth or Reality?Accord
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluationNancy Raj
 
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011BeckmanKH
 
Kirkpatrick's Levels of Training Evaluation - Training and Development
Kirkpatrick's Levels of Training Evaluation - Training and DevelopmentKirkpatrick's Levels of Training Evaluation - Training and Development
Kirkpatrick's Levels of Training Evaluation - Training and DevelopmentManu Melwin Joy
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluationdhruvt35
 
Chapter 6, Training Evaluation
Chapter 6, Training Evaluation Chapter 6, Training Evaluation
Chapter 6, Training Evaluation Kacung Abdullah
 
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation ModelKirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation ModelMaram Barqawi
 
Evaluation of training methods
Evaluation of training methodsEvaluation of training methods
Evaluation of training methodsSharon
 
Kaufman’s five levels of evaluation of trainning
Kaufman’s five levels of evaluation of trainningKaufman’s five levels of evaluation of trainning
Kaufman’s five levels of evaluation of trainningSaranya Dhanesh Kumar
 
Return On Investment Training And Development
Return On Investment   Training And DevelopmentReturn On Investment   Training And Development
Return On Investment Training And DevelopmentAhmed Zeen EL Abeden
 
9. Evaluation of Training Effectiveness
9. Evaluation of Training Effectiveness9. Evaluation of Training Effectiveness
9. Evaluation of Training EffectivenessISEAL Alliance
 
Training evaluation models
Training evaluation modelsTraining evaluation models
Training evaluation modelsMegha Anilkumar
 
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1oircjournals
 
Training & development
Training & developmentTraining & development
Training & developmentRekha Tiwary
 
Measuring roi of training
Measuring roi of trainingMeasuring roi of training
Measuring roi of trainingDreams Design
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluationMis bah
 
Training & Development - Assessment Methods
Training & Development - Assessment MethodsTraining & Development - Assessment Methods
Training & Development - Assessment MethodsM R Jhalawad
 
9:Evaluation of Training Effectiveness
9:Evaluation of Training Effectiveness9:Evaluation of Training Effectiveness
9:Evaluation of Training EffectivenessRichardBrennan
 

What's hot (20)

Measuring the Effectiveness of Training - Myth or Reality?
Measuring the Effectiveness of Training - Myth or Reality?Measuring the Effectiveness of Training - Myth or Reality?
Measuring the Effectiveness of Training - Myth or Reality?
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluation
 
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011
Training Evaluation workshop slides.may2011
 
Kirkpatrick's Levels of Training Evaluation - Training and Development
Kirkpatrick's Levels of Training Evaluation - Training and DevelopmentKirkpatrick's Levels of Training Evaluation - Training and Development
Kirkpatrick's Levels of Training Evaluation - Training and Development
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluation
 
Chapter 6, Training Evaluation
Chapter 6, Training Evaluation Chapter 6, Training Evaluation
Chapter 6, Training Evaluation
 
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation ModelKirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model
 
Evaluation of training methods
Evaluation of training methodsEvaluation of training methods
Evaluation of training methods
 
Kaufman’s five levels of evaluation of trainning
Kaufman’s five levels of evaluation of trainningKaufman’s five levels of evaluation of trainning
Kaufman’s five levels of evaluation of trainning
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluation
 
Return On Investment Training And Development
Return On Investment   Training And DevelopmentReturn On Investment   Training And Development
Return On Investment Training And Development
 
9. Evaluation of Training Effectiveness
9. Evaluation of Training Effectiveness9. Evaluation of Training Effectiveness
9. Evaluation of Training Effectiveness
 
Training evaluation models
Training evaluation modelsTraining evaluation models
Training evaluation models
 
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1
Approaches of-evaluation-of-training-and-development-in-banks1
 
Training & development
Training & developmentTraining & development
Training & development
 
Ciro approach
Ciro approachCiro approach
Ciro approach
 
Measuring roi of training
Measuring roi of trainingMeasuring roi of training
Measuring roi of training
 
Training evaluation
Training evaluationTraining evaluation
Training evaluation
 
Training & Development - Assessment Methods
Training & Development - Assessment MethodsTraining & Development - Assessment Methods
Training & Development - Assessment Methods
 
9:Evaluation of Training Effectiveness
9:Evaluation of Training Effectiveness9:Evaluation of Training Effectiveness
9:Evaluation of Training Effectiveness
 

Viewers also liked

Lead form geo testing us -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing us -DO NOT DELETELead form geo testing us -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing us -DO NOT DELETEtest prod1
 
File 1 removed 5 words 2
File 1 removed 5 words 2File 1 removed 5 words 2
File 1 removed 5 words 2test prod1
 
File 4 removed 1 word 1
File 4 removed 1 word 1File 4 removed 1 word 1
File 4 removed 1 word 1test prod1
 
File 3 original copy 2
File 3 original copy 2File 3 original copy 2
File 3 original copy 2test prod1
 
File 1 four extra slides 1
File 1 four extra slides 1File 1 four extra slides 1
File 1 four extra slides 1test prod1
 
File 4 original copy 2
File 4 original copy 2File 4 original copy 2
File 4 original copy 2test prod1
 
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 1
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 1File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 1
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 1test prod1
 
regular upload
regular uploadregular upload
regular uploadtest prod1
 
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2test prod1
 
File 4 removed 4 slides 2
File 4 removed 4 slides 2File 4 removed 4 slides 2
File 4 removed 4 slides 2test prod1
 
File 3 removed 5 words 2
File 3 removed 5 words 2File 3 removed 5 words 2
File 3 removed 5 words 2test prod1
 
File 4 removed 5 words 2
File 4 removed 5 words 2File 4 removed 5 words 2
File 4 removed 5 words 2test prod1
 
Qa course total pot
Qa course total potQa course total pot
Qa course total pottest prod1
 

Viewers also liked (17)

Lead form geo testing us -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing us -DO NOT DELETELead form geo testing us -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing us -DO NOT DELETE
 
File 1 removed 5 words 2
File 1 removed 5 words 2File 1 removed 5 words 2
File 1 removed 5 words 2
 
File 4 removed 1 word 1
File 4 removed 1 word 1File 4 removed 1 word 1
File 4 removed 1 word 1
 
File 3 original copy 2
File 3 original copy 2File 3 original copy 2
File 3 original copy 2
 
File 1 four extra slides 1
File 1 four extra slides 1File 1 four extra slides 1
File 1 four extra slides 1
 
File 4 original copy 2
File 4 original copy 2File 4 original copy 2
File 4 original copy 2
 
File 1 copy 2
File 1 copy 2File 1 copy 2
File 1 copy 2
 
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 1
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 1File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 1
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 1
 
regular upload
regular uploadregular upload
regular upload
 
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2
File 1 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2
 
Unique file 1
Unique file 1Unique file 1
Unique file 1
 
File 4 removed 4 slides 2
File 4 removed 4 slides 2File 4 removed 4 slides 2
File 4 removed 4 slides 2
 
File 3 removed 5 words 2
File 3 removed 5 words 2File 3 removed 5 words 2
File 3 removed 5 words 2
 
File 4 removed 5 words 2
File 4 removed 5 words 2File 4 removed 5 words 2
File 4 removed 5 words 2
 
Qa course total pot
Qa course total potQa course total pot
Qa course total pot
 
Unique file 9
Unique file 9Unique file 9
Unique file 9
 
Unique file 2
Unique file 2Unique file 2
Unique file 2
 

Similar to Unique file 8

Measuring roi of training ppt slides
Measuring roi of training ppt slidesMeasuring roi of training ppt slides
Measuring roi of training ppt slidesYodhia Antariksa
 
Measuring ROI of Training
Measuring ROI of Training  Measuring ROI of Training
Measuring ROI of Training Yodhia Antariksa
 
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development Ravinder Tulsiani
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development   Ravinder TulsianiMeasuring Roi Of Training & Development   Ravinder Tulsiani
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development Ravinder TulsianiRavinder Tulsiani
 
Evaluation of training
Evaluation of trainingEvaluation of training
Evaluation of trainingSelf-employed
 
G.training evaluation by jyoti k
G.training evaluation by jyoti kG.training evaluation by jyoti k
G.training evaluation by jyoti kjyoti karvande
 
Evaluation of training Program
Evaluation of training ProgramEvaluation of training Program
Evaluation of training ProgramSomya Tiwari
 
PRESCRIPTIVE-EVALUATION-GALLA-JOHNNY-G..pptx
PRESCRIPTIVE-EVALUATION-GALLA-JOHNNY-G..pptxPRESCRIPTIVE-EVALUATION-GALLA-JOHNNY-G..pptx
PRESCRIPTIVE-EVALUATION-GALLA-JOHNNY-G..pptxJOHNNYGALLA2
 
Interviews Module 05 – Live ChatEvaluating Tr.docx
Interviews  Module 05 – Live ChatEvaluating Tr.docxInterviews  Module 05 – Live ChatEvaluating Tr.docx
Interviews Module 05 – Live ChatEvaluating Tr.docxnormanibarber20063
 
ROI Evaluation Approach
ROI Evaluation ApproachROI Evaluation Approach
ROI Evaluation Approachdmdk12
 
evaluation of program.pptx
evaluation of program.pptxevaluation of program.pptx
evaluation of program.pptxMahwishBukhari3
 
Does your learning solution solve business performance problems?
Does your learning solution solve business performance problems?Does your learning solution solve business performance problems?
Does your learning solution solve business performance problems?Javier Amaro Castillo
 
Training &n Development Studies & Evaluation
Training &n Development Studies & EvaluationTraining &n Development Studies & Evaluation
Training &n Development Studies & EvaluationElsaCherian1
 
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation model
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation modelKirkpatrick 4 level evaluation model
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation modelzhumin
 
Tarining evaluation
Tarining evaluation Tarining evaluation
Tarining evaluation Rahul Rajan
 
Measuring learning impact & effectiveness
Measuring learning impact & effectivenessMeasuring learning impact & effectiveness
Measuring learning impact & effectivenessJoko Suseno
 

Similar to Unique file 8 (20)

Measuring roi of training ppt slides
Measuring roi of training ppt slidesMeasuring roi of training ppt slides
Measuring roi of training ppt slides
 
Measuring roi of training
Measuring roi of trainingMeasuring roi of training
Measuring roi of training
 
Measuring ROI of Training
Measuring ROI of Training  Measuring ROI of Training
Measuring ROI of Training
 
MED07_joycepagkatipunan.pdf
MED07_joycepagkatipunan.pdfMED07_joycepagkatipunan.pdf
MED07_joycepagkatipunan.pdf
 
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development Ravinder Tulsiani
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development   Ravinder TulsianiMeasuring Roi Of Training & Development   Ravinder Tulsiani
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development Ravinder Tulsiani
 
Beyond surveys
Beyond surveysBeyond surveys
Beyond surveys
 
Training Evaluation
Training EvaluationTraining Evaluation
Training Evaluation
 
Evaluation of training
Evaluation of trainingEvaluation of training
Evaluation of training
 
G.training evaluation by jyoti k
G.training evaluation by jyoti kG.training evaluation by jyoti k
G.training evaluation by jyoti k
 
Evaluation of training Program
Evaluation of training ProgramEvaluation of training Program
Evaluation of training Program
 
PRESCRIPTIVE-EVALUATION-GALLA-JOHNNY-G..pptx
PRESCRIPTIVE-EVALUATION-GALLA-JOHNNY-G..pptxPRESCRIPTIVE-EVALUATION-GALLA-JOHNNY-G..pptx
PRESCRIPTIVE-EVALUATION-GALLA-JOHNNY-G..pptx
 
Interviews Module 05 – Live ChatEvaluating Tr.docx
Interviews  Module 05 – Live ChatEvaluating Tr.docxInterviews  Module 05 – Live ChatEvaluating Tr.docx
Interviews Module 05 – Live ChatEvaluating Tr.docx
 
ROI Evaluation Approach
ROI Evaluation ApproachROI Evaluation Approach
ROI Evaluation Approach
 
evaluation of program.pptx
evaluation of program.pptxevaluation of program.pptx
evaluation of program.pptx
 
Training & development evaluation
Training & development evaluationTraining & development evaluation
Training & development evaluation
 
Does your learning solution solve business performance problems?
Does your learning solution solve business performance problems?Does your learning solution solve business performance problems?
Does your learning solution solve business performance problems?
 
Training &n Development Studies & Evaluation
Training &n Development Studies & EvaluationTraining &n Development Studies & Evaluation
Training &n Development Studies & Evaluation
 
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation model
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation modelKirkpatrick 4 level evaluation model
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation model
 
Tarining evaluation
Tarining evaluation Tarining evaluation
Tarining evaluation
 
Measuring learning impact & effectiveness
Measuring learning impact & effectivenessMeasuring learning impact & effectiveness
Measuring learning impact & effectiveness
 

More from test prod1

Lead form geo testing eu -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing eu -DO NOT DELETELead form geo testing eu -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing eu -DO NOT DELETEtest prod1
 
Lead form geo testing in -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing in -DO NOT DELETELead form geo testing in -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing in -DO NOT DELETEtest prod1
 
Unique file 15
Unique file 15Unique file 15
Unique file 15test prod1
 
Unique file 14
Unique file 14Unique file 14
Unique file 14test prod1
 
Unique file 12
Unique file 12Unique file 12
Unique file 12test prod1
 
Unique file 11
Unique file 11Unique file 11
Unique file 11test prod1
 
Unique file 10
Unique file 10Unique file 10
Unique file 10test prod1
 
File 5 removed 5 words 2
File 5 removed 5 words 2File 5 removed 5 words 2
File 5 removed 5 words 2test prod1
 
File 5 removed 5 words 1
File 5 removed 5 words 1File 5 removed 5 words 1
File 5 removed 5 words 1test prod1
 
File 5 removed 4 slides 2
File 5 removed 4 slides 2File 5 removed 4 slides 2
File 5 removed 4 slides 2test prod1
 
File 5 removed 4 slides 1
File 5 removed 4 slides 1File 5 removed 4 slides 1
File 5 removed 4 slides 1test prod1
 
File 5 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2
File 5 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2File 5 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2
File 5 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2test prod1
 

More from test prod1 (20)

Ppt11
Ppt11Ppt11
Ppt11
 
Do notdelete
Do notdeleteDo notdelete
Do notdelete
 
Do notdelete
Do notdeleteDo notdelete
Do notdelete
 
7
77
7
 
Lead form geo testing eu -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing eu -DO NOT DELETELead form geo testing eu -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing eu -DO NOT DELETE
 
Lead form geo testing in -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing in -DO NOT DELETELead form geo testing in -DO NOT DELETE
Lead form geo testing in -DO NOT DELETE
 
Unique file 15
Unique file 15Unique file 15
Unique file 15
 
Unique file 14
Unique file 14Unique file 14
Unique file 14
 
Unique file 12
Unique file 12Unique file 12
Unique file 12
 
Unique file 11
Unique file 11Unique file 11
Unique file 11
 
Unique file 10
Unique file 10Unique file 10
Unique file 10
 
Unique file 7
Unique file 7Unique file 7
Unique file 7
 
Unique file 5
Unique file 5Unique file 5
Unique file 5
 
Unique file 4
Unique file 4Unique file 4
Unique file 4
 
Unique file 3
Unique file 3Unique file 3
Unique file 3
 
File 5 removed 5 words 2
File 5 removed 5 words 2File 5 removed 5 words 2
File 5 removed 5 words 2
 
File 5 removed 5 words 1
File 5 removed 5 words 1File 5 removed 5 words 1
File 5 removed 5 words 1
 
File 5 removed 4 slides 2
File 5 removed 4 slides 2File 5 removed 4 slides 2
File 5 removed 4 slides 2
 
File 5 removed 4 slides 1
File 5 removed 4 slides 1File 5 removed 4 slides 1
File 5 removed 4 slides 1
 
File 5 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2
File 5 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2File 5 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2
File 5 removed 1 word from 5 slides 2
 

Unique file 8

  • 2. 2www.exploreHR.org AgendaAgenda 1. Measuring the Effectiveness of Training Program 2. Measuring ‘Return on Investment’ of Training 3. Enhancing the Effectiveness and ROI of Training If you find this presentation useful, please consider telling others about our site (www.exploreHR.org)(www.exploreHR.org)
  • 3. 3www.exploreHR.org Measuring the Effectiveness ofMeasuring the Effectiveness of Training ProgramTraining Program
  • 4. 4www.exploreHR.org Training Need Analysis Training Objectives Training Delivery Training Evaluation Training ProcessTraining Process What are the training needs for this person and/or job? Objective should be measurable and observable Techniques include on- the-job- training, action learning, etc. Measure reaction, learning, behavior, and results
  • 5. 5www.exploreHR.org The Four Levels of EvaluationThe Four Levels of Evaluation Level 1 - Reaction Level 2 - Learning Level 3 – Behavior Application Level 4 – Business Impact Four LevelsFour Levels of Trainingof Training EffectivenessEffectiveness
  • 6. 6www.exploreHR.org Test the trainees to determine if they learned the principles, skills, and facts they were to learn. Evaluate trainees’ reactions to the program. Did they like the program? Did they think it worthwhile? Level 1 -Level 1 - ReactionReaction Level 2 -Level 2 - LearningLearning The Four Levels of EvaluationThe Four Levels of Evaluation
  • 7. 7www.exploreHR.org What final results were achieved in terms of the training objectives previously set? Did the number of customer complaints about employee drop? Did the reject rate improve? Was turnover reduced, and so forth. Ask whether the trainees’ behavior on the job changed because of the training program. For example, are employees in the store’s complaint department more courteous toward disgruntled customers than previously? Level 3 –Level 3 – BehaviorBehavior ApplicationApplication Level 4 –Level 4 – BusinessBusiness ImpactImpact The Four Levels of EvaluationThe Four Levels of Evaluation
  • 8. 8www.exploreHR.org Value ofValue of InformationInformation Frequency ofFrequency of UseUse Difficulty ofDifficulty of AssessmentAssessment Level I. Reaction II. Learning III. Behavior IV. Results The Four Levels of EvaluationThe Four Levels of Evaluation Least valuable Most valuable Frequent Infrequent Easy Difficult
  • 9. 9www.exploreHR.org Level 1 - ReactionLevel 1 - Reaction Evaluate trainees’ reactions to the program: Did they like the program? Did they like the facilitators? Did they like the training accommodation and facilities? Level 1 -Level 1 - ReactionReaction
  • 10. 10www.exploreHR.org Guidelines for Evaluating ReactionGuidelines for Evaluating Reaction 1. Determine what you want to find out 2. Design a form that will quantify reactions 3. Encourage written comments and suggestions 4. Get 100 percent immediate response 5. Get honest response 6. Develop acceptable standards 7. Measure reactions against standards, and take appropriate action 8. Communicate reaction as appropriate
  • 11. 11www.exploreHR.org Please give us your frank reactions and comments. They will help us to evaluate this program and improve future programs. Program : Facilitator : 1. How do you rate the subject (interest, benefit, etc) a. Excellent b. Very Good c. Good d. Fair e. Poor 2. How do you rate the facilitator? (knowledge, ability to deliver and communicate?) a. Excellent b. Very Good c. Good d. Fair e. Poor 3. How do you rate the facilities? (comfort, convinience, etc) a. Excellent b. Very Good c. Good d. Fair e. Poor 4. What would have improved the program? ………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………… Sample of Reaction Form
  • 12. 12www.exploreHR.org Level 2 - LearningLevel 2 - Learning Measuring learning means determining one or more of the following : • What knowledge was learned? • What skills were developed or improved? • What attitudes were changed? Level 2 -Level 2 - LearningLearning
  • 13. 13www.exploreHR.org Guidelines for Evaluating LearningGuidelines for Evaluating Learning 1. Use a control group if practical 2. Evaluate knowledge, skills and/or attitudes both before and after the program 3. Use a paper-and-pencil test to measure knowledge 4. Use a performance test to measure skills 5. Get 100 percent immediate response 6. Use the results of evaluation to take appropriate action
  • 14. 14www.exploreHR.org Guidelines for Evaluating LearningGuidelines for Evaluating Learning Experimental Group Control Group Pre Test Score 45 46 Post Test Score 55 48 Gain 10 2 Pretest and Posttest Scores on Change Management Training Example :
  • 15. 15www.exploreHR.org Level 3 – Behavior ApplicationLevel 3 – Behavior Application • The frequency of application of new skills/knowledge/ attitudes (on the job) • The effectiveness of the skills/knowledge/ attitudes (as applied on the job) Level 3 –Level 3 – BehaviorBehavior ApplicationApplication
  • 16. 16www.exploreHR.org Guidelines for Evaluating LearningGuidelines for Evaluating Learning 1. Use a control group if practical 2. Allow time for behavior change and application to take place 3. Evaluate both before and after the program if practical 4. Survey and/or interview one or more of the following : trainees, their immediate supervisor, their subordinates, and others who often observe their behavior 5. Get 100 percent response or a sampling 6. Repeat the evaluation at appropriate times 7. Consider cost versus benefits
  • 17. 17www.exploreHR.org Example of Survey to Measure Behavior Application Understanding and Motivating 1. Trying to understand my subordinates 5 4 3 2 1 2. Listening to my subordinates 5 4 3 2 1 3. Praising good work 5 4 3 2 1 4. Talking with subordinates about their family and personal interests 5. Asking my subordinates for their ideas 5 4 3 2 1 6. Applying "Management by Walking Around" 5 4 3 2 1 Time and energy spent after the prgram compared to time and energy spent before the program 5 4 3 2 1 Instruction: The objective of this questionnaire is to determine the extent to which those who attended the recent program on Leadership have applied the principles and techniques that they learned there to the job. Circle the answer that you consider appropriate for each question. 5 = Much more 4 = More 3 = Same 2 = Less 1 = Much less
  • 18. 18www.exploreHR.org Level 4 – Business ResultsLevel 4 – Business Results • Indicate the extent to which you think this program has influenced each of these measures in your work unit, department, or business unit: • Productivity • Quality • Customer Response Time • Cost Control • Employee Satisfaction • Customer Satisfaction • Other Level 4 –Level 4 – BusinessBusiness ResultsResults
  • 19. 19www.exploreHR.org Guidelines for Evaluating LearningGuidelines for Evaluating Learning 1. Use a control group if practical 2. Allow time for results to be achieved 3. Measure both before and after the program if practical 4. Repeat the evaluation at appropriate times 5. Consider cost versus benefits 6. Be satisfied with evidence if proof is not possible
  • 20. 20www.exploreHR.org Performance IndicatorsPerformance Indicators HARD DATA INDICATORS • Downtime duration • Number of defect products • Sales volume • Production unit • Customer satisfaction index • Response time to orders • Number of accidents at work • Others
  • 21. 21www.exploreHR.org Performance IndicatorsPerformance Indicators SOFT DATA INDICATORS (intangible impacts) • Job satisfaction • Conducive working relationship • Effective communication • Stress rate • Quality in decision-making
  • 22. 22www.exploreHR.org Example : Measuring Training ResultsExample : Measuring Training Results 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 Program : TQMTQM TrainingTraining Results after 33 months ofmonths of training,training, number of defects dropped to 80 units/day 120 units 80 units Before trainingBefore training After trainingAfter training
  • 23. 23www.exploreHR.org 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 Example : Measuring Training ResultsExample : Measuring Training Results Program : Sales TrainingSales Training Results after 33 months trainingmonths training, number of sales per salesman increase to 30 units/month. 20 units 30 units Before trainingBefore training After trainingAfter training
  • 24. 24www.exploreHR.org MeasuringMeasuring Return on Investment ofReturn on Investment of TrainingTraining
  • 25. 25www.exploreHR.org Level 5 : Return on Investment of TrainingLevel 5 : Return on Investment of Training Level 1 - Reaction Level 2 - Learning Level 3 – Behavior Application Level 4 – Business Impact Level 5 – Return on Investment of Training
  • 26. 26www.exploreHR.org Criteria for Selecting Programs for LevelsCriteria for Selecting Programs for Levels 4 and 5 Evaluation4 and 5 Evaluation • Importance of the program in meeting the organization’s goals • Cost of the program • Visibility of the program • Size of the target audience • Extent of management interest
  • 27. 27www.exploreHR.org Benefits of ROI of TrainingBenefits of ROI of Training • Measure contribution • Set priorities • Focus on results • Alter management perceptions of training
  • 28. 28www.exploreHR.org ROI of Training ModelROI of Training Model CollectCollect DataData Isolate theIsolate the Effects ofEffects of TrainingTraining Convert DataConvert Data to Monetaryto Monetary ValuesValues Calculate ROICalculate ROI of Trainingof Training TabulateTabulate ProgramProgram CostsCosts IdentifyIdentify IntangibleIntangible BenefitsBenefits
  • 29. 29www.exploreHR.org Net Program BenefitsNet Program Benefits Program CostsProgram Costs X 100X 100 Return on Investment FormulaReturn on Investment Formula ROI =ROI = ExampleExample :: • Costs per program (25 participants)Costs per program (25 participants) $ 88,500$ 88,500 • Benefits per program (1st year)Benefits per program (1st year) $230,625$230,625 $ 230,625 – 88,500$ 230,625 – 88,500 $ 88,500$ 88,500 ROI =ROI = X 100X 100 ROI = 161 %ROI = 161 %
  • 30. 30www.exploreHR.org Collecting DataCollecting Data • Identify appropriate performance indicators • Develop a collection plan CollectCollect DataData
  • 31. 31www.exploreHR.org Example of Performance IndicatorsExample of Performance Indicators • Units produced • Items sold • Work backlog • New accounts opened • Productivity • Inventory turnover • Etc. OutputOutput • Equipment downtime • Overtime • Time to project completion • Processing time • Repair time • Lost time days • Etc TimeTime
  • 32. 32www.exploreHR.org Example of Hard IndicatorsExample of Hard Indicators • Unit costs • Variable costs • Overhead costs • Operating costs • Number of cost reduction • Etc. CostCost • Scrap • Waste • Rejects • Error rates • Rework • Product defects • Product failure QualityQuality
  • 33. 33www.exploreHR.org Example of Performance ResultsExample of Performance Results • Some performance results after trainingSome performance results after training program:program: • Scrap was reduced from 11 % to 7.4 % • Absenteeism was reduce from 7 % to 3.25 % • The annual turnover rate was reduced from 30 % to 16 % • Lost time accidents were reduced 95 %
  • 34. 34www.exploreHR.org Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training Methods toMethods to Isolate theIsolate the Effects ofEffects of TrainingTraining UsingUsing Control GroupControl Group TrendTrend LinesLines ParticipantsParticipants EstimateEstimate Supervisors ofSupervisors of ParticipantsParticipants EstimateEstimate
  • 35. 35www.exploreHR.org UsingUsing ControlControl GroupGroup • A control group arrangement can be used to isolate training impact. • With this strategy, one group receives training, while another, similar group does not receive training. • The difference in the performance of the two groups is attributed to the training program. Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training
  • 36. 36www.exploreHR.org TrendTrend LinesLines • Trend lines are used to project the values of specific output variables if training had not been undertaken. • The projection is compared to the actual data after training, and the difference represents the estimate impact of training. Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training
  • 37. 37www.exploreHR.org Trend Lines AnalysisTrend Lines Analysis Jan Feb Mar Apr JulJunMay Aug At the beginning of May, a Sales training Program session was held VolumeofSales The difference represents the estimate impact of training. Trend Projection Actual sales performance
  • 38. 38www.exploreHR.org Participants andParticipants and Supervisors ofSupervisors of ParticipantsParticipants Estimate ofEstimate of Training’s ImpactTraining’s Impact • This method rests on the assumption that participants (and their supervisors) are capable of estimating how much a performance improvement is related to the training program. • Because their actions have produced the improvement, participants (and their supervisors) may have very accurate input on the issue. • They should know how much of the change was caused by applying what they have learned in the program. Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training
  • 39. 39www.exploreHR.org Participants andParticipants and Supervisors ofSupervisors of ParticipantsParticipants Estimate ofEstimate of Training’s ImpactTraining’s Impact • Typical Questions to Estimate :Typical Questions to Estimate : • What percent this improvement can be attributed to the application of skills/techniques/knowledge gained in the training program? • What confidence do you have in this estimate, expresses as a percent? • What other factors contributed to this improvement in performance? Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training
  • 40. 40www.exploreHR.org 1 Training Program 50% 70% 2 Change in Procedures 10% 80% 3 Adjustment in Standards 10% 50% 4 Revision to Incentive Plan 20% 90% 5 Increased Management Attention 10% 50% 6 Other - - Percent Improvement Caused by Confidence Expressed as a Percent Factors Which Influenced ImprovementNo. Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training Example of a Participant’s EstimationExample of a Participant’s Estimation The confidence percentage is multiplied by the estimate (50 % x 70 %) to produce a usable traininga usable training factor value of 35 %factor value of 35 %
  • 41. 41www.exploreHR.org 1 Training Program 50% 70% 2 Change in Procedures 10% 80% 3 Adjustment in Standards 10% 50% 4 Revision to Incentive Plan 20% 90% 5 Increased Management Attention 10% 50% 6 Other - - Percent Improvement Caused by Confidence Expressed as a Percent Factors Which Influenced ImprovementNo. Isolating the Effects of TrainingIsolating the Effects of Training Example of a Participant’s EstimationExample of a Participant’s Estimation • The confidence percentage is multiplied by the estimate (50 % x 70 %) to produce a usable training factor value of 35 % • This adjusted percentage is then multiplied by the actual amount of improvement (post-program minus pre-program value) to isolate the portion attributed to training • The adjusted improvement is now ready for conversion to monetary values, and used in the return on investment
  • 42. 42www.exploreHR.org Converting Data to Monetary ValuesConverting Data to Monetary Values ConvertingConverting Data toData to MonetaryMonetary ValuesValues • Steps to Convert Data to MonetarySteps to Convert Data to Monetary ValuesValues 1. Focus on a unit of improvement 2. Determine a value of each unit 3. Calculate the change in performance data 4. Determine an annual amount of change 5. Calculate the annual value of improvement
  • 43. 43www.exploreHR.org Steps to Convert Data to Monetary ValuesSteps to Convert Data to Monetary Values An example to illustrate the steps to convert data to monetary values 1. Focus on unit improvement • One grievance reaching step two in the four-step grievance resolution process StepsSteps IllustrationIllustration 2. Determine a value of each unit • Using internal experts, the cost of an average grievance was estimated to be $ 6,500 when considering time and direct costs (V = $ 6,500)
  • 44. 44www.exploreHR.org Steps to Convert Data to Monetary ValuesSteps to Convert Data to Monetary Values 3. Calculate the change in performance data • Six months after the program was completed, total grievances per month reaching step two declined by ten. • Seven of the then grievance reductions were related to the program as determined by supervisors (isolating the effects of training) StepsSteps IllustrationIllustration 4. Determine an annual amount for the change • Using the six month value, seven per month (grievance reductions), yields an annual improvement of 84 (7 x 12 months)
  • 45. 45www.exploreHR.org Steps to Convert Data to Monetary ValuesSteps to Convert Data to Monetary Values 5. Calculate the annual value of improvement • Annual value = 84 x $ 6,500 = $ 546,000 StepsSteps IllustrationIllustration
  • 46. 46www.exploreHR.org TabulatingTabulating cost of thecost of the programprogram • Tabulating the costs involves monitoring or developing all of the related costs of the program targeted for the ROI calculation. Tabulating Cost of the ProgramTabulating Cost of the Program
  • 47. 47www.exploreHR.org TabulatingTabulating cost of thecost of the programprogram • Cost components that should be included are : • The cost to design and develop the program • The cost of all program materials provided to each participant • The cost for facilitator • The cost of the facilities of the training program Tabulating Cost of the ProgramTabulating Cost of the Program
  • 48. 48www.exploreHR.org TabulatingTabulating cost of thecost of the programprogram • Cost components that should be included are : • Travel, lodging, and meal costs for the participants • Salaries, plus employee benefits of the participants who attend the training • Administrative and overhead costs of the training function, allocated in some convenient way Tabulating Cost of the ProgramTabulating Cost of the Program
  • 49. 49www.exploreHR.org An Example to Illustrate ROI analysisAn Example to Illustrate ROI analysis Weeks after training Trained Group Control Group 1 US$ 9,723 9,698 2 9,978 9,720 3 10,424 9,812 13 13,690 11,572 14 11,491 9,683 15 11,044 10,092 Average for weeks 12,075 10,449 13, 14, 15 Post Training Data Average Weekly Sales
  • 50. 50www.exploreHR.org An Example to Illustrate ROI analysisAn Example to Illustrate ROI analysis Data US$ Average weekly sales Trained Group 12,075 Control Group 10,449 Increase 1,626 Profit Contribution from Training 2 % 32.50 (Training Impacts) Total weekly improvement 1,495 (32.5 x 46 participants) Total annual benefit 71,760 ($ 1,495 x 48 weeks) Annualized Program Benefits Note : 46 participants were still in job after 3 months
  • 51. 51www.exploreHR.org An Example to Illustrate ROI analysisAn Example to Illustrate ROI analysis Cost US$ Facilitation fees 11,250 Program materials : $ 35 x 46 1,610 Meals : 3 days x $ 28 x 46 1,288 Participant salaries plus benefit (35 %) 12,442 Coordination and Evaluation 2,500 Total Cost 29,090 Cost Summary : An Illustration ROI (%): $ 71,760 - $ 29,090 $ 29,090 146 % x 100= =
  • 53. 53www.exploreHR.org How Effective is Your Training Program?How Effective is Your Training Program? Broad and Newstrom (1992) report studies have shown less than 30% of what is30% of what is actually taughtactually taught transfers to the job in a way that enhancestransfers to the job in a way that enhances performanceperformance. Source : Broad, M., & Newstrom, J. W. (1992). Transfer of training: Action packed strategies to ensure high payoff from training investments. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
  • 54. 54www.exploreHR.org Source of Barriers to TrainingSource of Barriers to Training TransferTransfer • Lack of reinforcement on the job • Interference from immediate (work) environment • Nonsupportive organizational culture • Trainees’ perception of impractical training programs • Separation from the inspiration or support of the trainer
  • 55. 55www.exploreHR.org The Transfer PartnershipThe Transfer Partnership Trainee Trainee recognizes need for new skills Trainee Trainer Trainer designs and/or delivers learning experiences Trainee Trainer Manager supports learning and application on the job Manager
  • 56. 56www.exploreHR.org The Transfer MatrixThe Transfer Matrix Before During After Manager Trainer Trainee Time PeriodsRolePlayers
  • 57. 57www.exploreHR.org ManagerManager Before TrainingBefore Training • Build transfer of training into supervisory performance standards • Collect baseline performance data • Involve supervisors and trainees in needs analysis process • Involve trainees in program planning • Brief trainees on the importance of the training (course objective, content, process, and application on the job) • Review instructional content and materials • Plan to participate in training sessions • Encourage trainees attendance at all sessions
  • 58. 58www.exploreHR.org TrainerTrainer Before TrainingBefore Training • Align the training plan with the organization's strategic plan • Systematically design instruction • Provide proactive opportunities • Design a peer coaching component for the program and its follow-up activities
  • 59. 59www.exploreHR.org TraineeTrainee Before TrainingBefore Training • Provide input into program planning • Actively explore training options • Participate in advance activities
  • 60. 60www.exploreHR.org ManagerManager During TrainingDuring Training • Prevent interruptions • Transfer work assignment to others • Monitor attendance and attention to training • Recognize trainee participation • Participate in transfer action planning • Review information on employee in training • Plan assessment of transfer of new skills to the job
  • 61. 61www.exploreHR.org TrainerTrainer During TrainingDuring Training • Develop application-oriented objectives • Answer the “WIIFM” question • Manage the unlearning process • Provide realistic work-related tasks • Give individualized feedback • Provide job performance aid
  • 62. 62www.exploreHR.org TraineeTrainee During TrainingDuring Training • Maintain an ideas and application notebook • Participate actively • Form support groups • Plan for applications • Create behavioral contracts
  • 63. 63www.exploreHR.org ManagerManager After TrainingAfter Training • Plan trainees’ reentry • Provide opportunities to practice new skills • Have trainees participate in transfer-related decisions • Reduce job pressures initially • Give positive reinforcement • Schedule trainee briefings for co-workers • Set mutual expectations for improvement • Arrange proactive (refresher) sessions • Provide and support the use of job aids
  • 64. 64www.exploreHR.org TrainerTrainer After TrainingAfter Training • Provide follow-up support • Conduct evaluation surveys and provide feedback • Develop and administer recognition system • Provide refresher/problem-solving sessions
  • 65. 65www.exploreHR.org TraineeTrainee After TrainingAfter Training • Practice self-management • Review training content and learned skills • Develop a mentoring relationship • Maintain contact with training ‘buddies’
  • 66. 66www.exploreHR.org Recommended Further ReadingsRecommended Further Readings 1. Donald Kirkpatrick, Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels, Berrett-Koehler Publishers 2. Jack J. Phillips and Patricia Phillips, In Action : Measuring Return On Investment, American Society for Training & Development 3. Mary Broad and John Newstrom, Transfer of training: Action Packed Strategies to Ensure High Payoff from Training Investments, Addison- Wesley.

Editor's Notes

  1. Notes
  2. Notes
  3. Notes
  4. Notes
  5. Notes
  6. Notes
  7. Notes
  8. Notes
  9. Notes
  10. Notes