SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 5
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
HILDEBRAND                                                MCLEOD                                 & NELSON
                                          REPRESENTING INJURED RAILROAD WORKERS SINCE 1926
 FREDERICK L. NELSON                                              QUYNHL. NGUYEN                                                             VICTOR A. RUSSO
 DAVID B. DRAHEIM                                                   RYANJ.OTIS                                                              MICHAEL J. VENER
 ANTHONY S. PETRU                                              BRADLEY W. WAHRLICH                                                            JAMES ROBERTS
 KRISTOFFER S. MAYFIELD

 350 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA                                                                                                                  700 NORTH BRAND BLVD.
 FOURTH FLOOR                                                                                                                                            SUITE 860
                                                                  WWW.HMNLAW.COM
 OAKLAND, CA 94612                                                                                                                              GLENDALE, CA 91203
 1-800-447-7500                                                                                                                                    1-800-447-7500



                                              IF YOU ARE INJURED WHILE ON DUTY:
     I.   Obtain medical treatment as soon as possible. You have the right to see the medical provider of your choice. You do not have to use railroad provided
          treatment centers. If threatened with insubordination, comply with managers request and then seek treatment with your own medical provider or hospital.
    2.    Do not allow railroad management into the examination room, or to discuss treatment of your injury with your medical provider or your family.
    3.    Do not fill out the accident report until you are mentally and physically able.
    4.    Do not give a taped or written statement to the railroad.
    5.    Immediately contact our Office or your Union Representative to help you fill out the accident report if you are unsure of how to answer any question.
                                      Call Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson, Inc. 1-800-447-7500

                                      Important Medical Information for Medical Providers:

    •     All medical bills are paid through the employee's group health insurance policy.

    •     Railroad workers do not have any rights under state worker's compensation.

    •     When injured on the job, railroad workers are governed by the Federal Employer's Liability Act
          ("FELA") .

    •     FELA does not have a medical provision clause.

    •     The employer railroad does not have a right to talk to the employee's medical providers, obtain medical
          records, or participate in medical examinations without the employee's prior approval.

    •     Employees and medical providers are not required to get the company's authorization for medical
          treatment.

    •     The employer railroad might process the bills, but that does not waive the employee's doctor/patient
          privilege.


 UNDERSTANDING                 YOUR RIGHTS UNDER FELA IS THE FIRST STEP IN PROTECTING                                                          YOUR RIGHTS.

                                       CONSULT WITH HILDEBRAND, McLEOD                                & NELSON,INC.
                                                                        1-800-447 -7 500
                                                                      www.hmnlaw.com

                                               Designated Legal Counsel- Investigators/Consultants
Ron Reich                       C (510)   501-9818           reich@hmnlaw.com       Thomas Lelevich                 C   (916)   947-3348        lelevich@hmnlaw.com
Marty Dollar                    C (503)   860-1071          dollar@hmnlaw.com       Bob Ricou                       C   (661)   303-0972        ricou@hmnlaw.coll1
K.D. Lee                        C (661)   303-1710            kd.lcs@bak.rr.com     John Kallal                     C   (213)   509-3517        kallal@hll1nlaw.coll1
Ronald Johnson                  C (775)   721-5530                  rxrj@aol.com    Amy McCarthy                    C   (626)   484-5374        mccarthy@hmnlaw.coll1
Carlos Mora                     C (916)   764-6701           mora@hnmlaw.com        Art Flores                      C   (213)   712-4945        flores@hll1nlaw.coll1
Lou Bottini                     C (916)   207-1089         bottini@hmnlaw.com       Diego Rojas                     C   (909)   238-1105        rojas@hmnlaw.coll1
ATTORNEYS & OFFICES




      W"HISTLEBLOW"ER VIOLATIONS
                                    WHAT ARE WHISTLEBLOWER VIOLATIONS?
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 20109, the railroad commits a whistleblower violation when it engages in any adverse action
against a railroad worker because that worker performed a protected activity.

Common Protected Activities:                                       Common Adverse Actions:

  •   Notifying the railroad of work-related injuries and            •   Discipline                  •    Intimidation
      medical conditions                                             •   Firing                      •    Threats
  •   Reporting hazardous safety or security conditions              •   Harassment                  •    Reduced pay, hours, or
  •   Accurately reporting hours of service                          •   Probation or adverse             choice of jobs
  •   Filing or assisting with an OSHA Complaint                         "points" assessments        •    Blacklisting
  •   The railroad cannot delay, deny, or interfere with your        •   Retaliation
      medical treatment
Examples of Potential Violations:
       1)   Termination, discipline, or harassment for reporting an on-duty injury or hazardous safety condition
       2)   Delaying or denying an employee's request for hospital or medical care
       3)   Railroad nurse or railroad doctor interfering with or delaying medical care
       4)   Intimidation/Harassment: Threatening investigation or discipline if an injury is reported

                                             HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF
  1) Ask questions and get advice before and after reporting an injury
       • Contact your union reps and experienced attorneys at Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson LLP
  2) Explicitly request medical treatment
       • Your maximum protection is when you request hospital/ER care immediately after an injury
       • If you ask for the hospital, the railroad must promptly arrange transport to the nearest hospital
       • With or without a request, the railroad still cannot delay, deny, or interfere with your treatment
  3) Keep detailed notes
       • Write down all key events, dates, times, witnesses, and conversations with railroad managers
  4) Timely file a whistleblower complaint with OSHA
       • Timing: You must file your complaint no later than 180 days after an adverse action
       • Potential remedies: Punitive damages up to $250,000, back pay and other economic damages, emotional damages,
           reinstatement and clearing of personnel record, attorney fees, and other relief afforded by the law


                       © HILDEBRAND           McLEOD      & NELSON       INC.   I   www.hmnlaw.com
ATTORNEYS & OFFICES




                 FELA VERDICT:                                         $569,500.00
            $569,500.00      FELA Jury Verdict - December 17, 20121 Vergara v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
                                 Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson, Inc. 1 Attorney Victor A. Russo
                                          Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California

On October        16, 2008, Mr. Ron Vergara, age 36, was working                     as a
trainman     on a remote control job for Union Pacific Railroad at an
industry    called Lube Industries.            While attempting          to uncouple        two
railcars on a sharply curved track he encountered                       great difficulty
with the cut levers. He made several failed attempts                          to uncouple
the railcars which "tweaked"             his back. Evidence at trial established
that the railroad and Lube Industries                 had received numerous               com-
plaints from employees            over the years that the curved track
prevented     the cut levers from operating                as intended.        Nonetheless,
no changes in operations             or the configuration           of the track were
made and no warnings             were given to Mr. Vergara about the known
risk of injury.


Union Pacific's doctors          initially    diagnosed         Mr. Vergara's injuries as a "mild sprain;' but his family doctor                realized he had
serious injuries and Mr. Vergara ultimately                     underwent       back surgery in the form of a right L4-L5-$ 1 hemilaminotomy,
facetectomy       and foraminotomy              with microsurgical           discectomy.     As a result of these injuries, Mr. Vergara could not
return to work for Union Pacific. While off disabled                      from work, the railroad also terminated                   Mr. Vergara due to his failure
to provide    updated     medical        information       while he was on a leave of absence.


At the time of trial, Mr. Vergara's vocational                   expert testified    that after a training         program    he could obtain       employment
as a logistics    coordinator.        Despite his inability         to work as a trainman,             the railroad's   lawyers argued that Mr. Vergara was
entitled   to no more than $800.00 for his lost earnings,                       because the railroad's doctors            thought     the surgery       he under-
went was not caused by the incident                   and was instead due to his history of chronic                     back problems.      The railroad also
offered surveillance      video and relied heavily on printouts                     from Mr. Vergara's Facebook page, where he had posted
photographs        of his post-accident           activities,    including     frequent     fishing.


Before trial, the railroad offered             $200,000.00        to settle Mr. Vergara's case. This offer was rejected                 and after a two week
trial, the jury deliberated         for a day and a half before returning                  a gross verdict       of $850,000.00.      The jury also determined
that Mr. Vergara was partially               at fault for the incident        "for yanking       on the cut lever" resulting         in a net verdict     of
$569,500.00.       Mr. Vergara was represented                  at trial by Victor A. Russo of Hildebrand               McLeod & Nelson, Inc.

                                 © HILDEBRAND                    McLEOD         & NELSON           INC.     I   www.hmnlaw.com
ATTORNEYS                & OFFICES




                 FELA VERDICT: $3,081,600.00
                  $3,081,600.00 FELA Jury Verdict - December 14, 2012 1 Winckler v. BNSF Railway Company
                      Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson, Inc. 1 Attorneys Anthony S. Petru & Jason J. Romero
                                            Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona

Mr. Joseph Winckler             suffered   severe injuries to his knee and                   Injury to Right Knee, 1st & 2nd Surgeries, Joseph Winckler
ankle on May 29, 2007 when he was stepping                      down from a                                                                                          Current Condition
                                                                                                                                              Medial compartment
                                                                                                                                               of knee with loss
locomotive        in Winslow,      Arizona.      He stepped    down onto a tie                                                                  of cartilage &
                                                                                                                                                 narrowing of
that was longer than standard                 ties because the tie was part of                                                                    join/space
an approach         to a fueling     rack in BNSF's Winslow Yard. BNSF
had failed to properly            dress the tie with ballast or other
material       up to the top of the tie, as depicted           in BNSF's own
engineering        diagrams,       and Mr. Winckler's     knee and ankle
were caused to twist as he stepped                 down. The incident          was             Frayed,
                                                                                          degenerated
immediately         reported      and Mr. Winckler      was eventually                          lateral
                                                                                             meniscus      -        ••.••• ~, •••~.
disabled       from work as a conductor            for BNSF.                                     Surgical
                                                                                             resection of
                                                                                         media/meniscus
                                                                                                {partial),
Without        work as a conductor,        he went to work as a trainmas-                   irfrapatellar
                                                                                                     plica
ter trainee for BNSF in Winslow,                but BNSF failed to offer him a
permanent         position      at the end of his six month        training
period. As a result, he was forced to go back to his prior line of work to support                                            his family, working            as a wildland
firefighter.      Ultimately,     he could not continue        this work because of his knee injuries.                                Thereafter,       he moved throughout
the country        chasing non-railroad          work and struggling          for years before trial to make ends meet to support                                       his family.


While he was off work, he also continued                  to apply for jobs with BNSF, and attempted                                    to work directly           with BNSF's
vocational       manager        without    any success until shortly          before trial when BNSF offered                            him a yardmaster            trainee     position
in Seattle, Washington.             At the time of the trial he was working             as a yardmaster                       trainee,    but was not fully qualified                as a
yardmaster        and had not received a yardmaster              seniority      date.   Following              his yardmaster               training,      it was unlikely        he
could hold a permanent               position    as a yardmaster     because of his lack of yardmaster                                seniority.


Following       a three week trial in Phoenix, Arizona, the jury found                   BNSF liable for Mr. Winckler's                            injuries and returned                 a
verdict    of $3,852,000.00,         less a finding    of 20% contributory           negligence           by Mr. Winckler,                 resulting      in a net verdict        for Mr.
Winckler       in the amount        of $3,081 ,600.00.     Before trial, BNSF's "last and final" offer to settle the case was $75,000.00.


Mr. Winckler       was represented         at trial by Anthony      S. Petru of Hildebrand                McLeod & Nelson, Inc. and Jason J. Romero.

                                   © HILDEBRAND               McLEOD          & NELSON          INC.            I    www.hmnlaw.com
Medical Insurance Information &
                  Revocation of Health Information Release to Employer




                   I.     Insurance Coverage Not Through Workers' Compensation

To Whom It May Concern:

       I,                                             , am an employee with Union Pacific railroad.

        As a railroad employee, I am NOT covered by workers' compensation; rather on-duty injuries for
railroad employees are governed by the Federal Employer's Liability Act ("FELA") under 45 U.S.C. §§
51, et seq.

       My medical bills are paid through my employee group health insurance            policy; there is no
workers' compensation coverage.

       You are not required to get my employer's authorization for my medical treatment.


Date: -------                       Signed:                                                      _


                                    Print name:
                                                  -------------------


            II.    I Do Not Authorize the Release of My Health Information       to My Employer

To Whom It May Concern:

       I,                                             , do not authorize my health care provider,

_____         -::-- _ -:-:::-
                  _                                     ' to release any of my health information to my
employer, Union Pacific. In other words, I affirmatively instruct my above-named health care provider
not to release any of my health information to my employer.

       I hereby revoke any past authorizations    for the release of my health information to my employer.

      I also instruct my health care provider to contact me immediately if any person affiliated with
Union Pacific requests my health information.

      These instructions remain in effect indefinitely, unless I authorize a release of records to my
employer in writing and pursuant to HIPPA under 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164.


Date: --------                      Signed:                                                      _


                                    Print name:
                                                  -------------------

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von John Passi

Fringe benefits 2012
Fringe benefits 2012Fringe benefits 2012
Fringe benefits 2012John Passi
 
RRT and SS comparison
RRT and SS comparisonRRT and SS comparison
RRT and SS comparisonJohn Passi
 
Regarding housereport
Regarding housereportRegarding housereport
Regarding housereportJohn Passi
 
Unionsmakethemiddleclass
UnionsmakethemiddleclassUnionsmakethemiddleclass
UnionsmakethemiddleclassJohn Passi
 
06.27.2012 jph browntrade
06.27.2012 jph browntrade06.27.2012 jph browntrade
06.27.2012 jph browntradeJohn Passi
 
Companies are the new countries
Companies are the new countriesCompanies are the new countries
Companies are the new countriesJohn Passi
 
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2John Passi
 
Agreement 2012
Agreement 2012Agreement 2012
Agreement 2012John Passi
 
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2John Passi
 

Mehr von John Passi (12)

Rrt vs ss
Rrt vs ssRrt vs ss
Rrt vs ss
 
Fringe benefits 2012
Fringe benefits 2012Fringe benefits 2012
Fringe benefits 2012
 
RRT and SS comparison
RRT and SS comparisonRRT and SS comparison
RRT and SS comparison
 
Regarding housereport
Regarding housereportRegarding housereport
Regarding housereport
 
Unionsmakethemiddleclass
UnionsmakethemiddleclassUnionsmakethemiddleclass
Unionsmakethemiddleclass
 
06.27.2012 jph browntrade
06.27.2012 jph browntrade06.27.2012 jph browntrade
06.27.2012 jph browntrade
 
TPP
TPPTPP
TPP
 
House budget
House budgetHouse budget
House budget
 
Companies are the new countries
Companies are the new countriesCompanies are the new countries
Companies are the new countries
 
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2
 
Agreement 2012
Agreement 2012Agreement 2012
Agreement 2012
 
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2
Bletconductor certificatio nv14c blet2
 

Fela information

  • 1. HILDEBRAND MCLEOD & NELSON REPRESENTING INJURED RAILROAD WORKERS SINCE 1926 FREDERICK L. NELSON QUYNHL. NGUYEN VICTOR A. RUSSO DAVID B. DRAHEIM RYANJ.OTIS MICHAEL J. VENER ANTHONY S. PETRU BRADLEY W. WAHRLICH JAMES ROBERTS KRISTOFFER S. MAYFIELD 350 FRANK H. OGAWA PLAZA 700 NORTH BRAND BLVD. FOURTH FLOOR SUITE 860 WWW.HMNLAW.COM OAKLAND, CA 94612 GLENDALE, CA 91203 1-800-447-7500 1-800-447-7500 IF YOU ARE INJURED WHILE ON DUTY: I. Obtain medical treatment as soon as possible. You have the right to see the medical provider of your choice. You do not have to use railroad provided treatment centers. If threatened with insubordination, comply with managers request and then seek treatment with your own medical provider or hospital. 2. Do not allow railroad management into the examination room, or to discuss treatment of your injury with your medical provider or your family. 3. Do not fill out the accident report until you are mentally and physically able. 4. Do not give a taped or written statement to the railroad. 5. Immediately contact our Office or your Union Representative to help you fill out the accident report if you are unsure of how to answer any question. Call Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson, Inc. 1-800-447-7500 Important Medical Information for Medical Providers: • All medical bills are paid through the employee's group health insurance policy. • Railroad workers do not have any rights under state worker's compensation. • When injured on the job, railroad workers are governed by the Federal Employer's Liability Act ("FELA") . • FELA does not have a medical provision clause. • The employer railroad does not have a right to talk to the employee's medical providers, obtain medical records, or participate in medical examinations without the employee's prior approval. • Employees and medical providers are not required to get the company's authorization for medical treatment. • The employer railroad might process the bills, but that does not waive the employee's doctor/patient privilege. UNDERSTANDING YOUR RIGHTS UNDER FELA IS THE FIRST STEP IN PROTECTING YOUR RIGHTS. CONSULT WITH HILDEBRAND, McLEOD & NELSON,INC. 1-800-447 -7 500 www.hmnlaw.com Designated Legal Counsel- Investigators/Consultants Ron Reich C (510) 501-9818 reich@hmnlaw.com Thomas Lelevich C (916) 947-3348 lelevich@hmnlaw.com Marty Dollar C (503) 860-1071 dollar@hmnlaw.com Bob Ricou C (661) 303-0972 ricou@hmnlaw.coll1 K.D. Lee C (661) 303-1710 kd.lcs@bak.rr.com John Kallal C (213) 509-3517 kallal@hll1nlaw.coll1 Ronald Johnson C (775) 721-5530 rxrj@aol.com Amy McCarthy C (626) 484-5374 mccarthy@hmnlaw.coll1 Carlos Mora C (916) 764-6701 mora@hnmlaw.com Art Flores C (213) 712-4945 flores@hll1nlaw.coll1 Lou Bottini C (916) 207-1089 bottini@hmnlaw.com Diego Rojas C (909) 238-1105 rojas@hmnlaw.coll1
  • 2. ATTORNEYS & OFFICES W"HISTLEBLOW"ER VIOLATIONS WHAT ARE WHISTLEBLOWER VIOLATIONS? Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. Section 20109, the railroad commits a whistleblower violation when it engages in any adverse action against a railroad worker because that worker performed a protected activity. Common Protected Activities: Common Adverse Actions: • Notifying the railroad of work-related injuries and • Discipline • Intimidation medical conditions • Firing • Threats • Reporting hazardous safety or security conditions • Harassment • Reduced pay, hours, or • Accurately reporting hours of service • Probation or adverse choice of jobs • Filing or assisting with an OSHA Complaint "points" assessments • Blacklisting • The railroad cannot delay, deny, or interfere with your • Retaliation medical treatment Examples of Potential Violations: 1) Termination, discipline, or harassment for reporting an on-duty injury or hazardous safety condition 2) Delaying or denying an employee's request for hospital or medical care 3) Railroad nurse or railroad doctor interfering with or delaying medical care 4) Intimidation/Harassment: Threatening investigation or discipline if an injury is reported HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELF 1) Ask questions and get advice before and after reporting an injury • Contact your union reps and experienced attorneys at Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson LLP 2) Explicitly request medical treatment • Your maximum protection is when you request hospital/ER care immediately after an injury • If you ask for the hospital, the railroad must promptly arrange transport to the nearest hospital • With or without a request, the railroad still cannot delay, deny, or interfere with your treatment 3) Keep detailed notes • Write down all key events, dates, times, witnesses, and conversations with railroad managers 4) Timely file a whistleblower complaint with OSHA • Timing: You must file your complaint no later than 180 days after an adverse action • Potential remedies: Punitive damages up to $250,000, back pay and other economic damages, emotional damages, reinstatement and clearing of personnel record, attorney fees, and other relief afforded by the law © HILDEBRAND McLEOD & NELSON INC. I www.hmnlaw.com
  • 3. ATTORNEYS & OFFICES FELA VERDICT: $569,500.00 $569,500.00 FELA Jury Verdict - December 17, 20121 Vergara v. Union Pacific Railroad Company Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson, Inc. 1 Attorney Victor A. Russo Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California On October 16, 2008, Mr. Ron Vergara, age 36, was working as a trainman on a remote control job for Union Pacific Railroad at an industry called Lube Industries. While attempting to uncouple two railcars on a sharply curved track he encountered great difficulty with the cut levers. He made several failed attempts to uncouple the railcars which "tweaked" his back. Evidence at trial established that the railroad and Lube Industries had received numerous com- plaints from employees over the years that the curved track prevented the cut levers from operating as intended. Nonetheless, no changes in operations or the configuration of the track were made and no warnings were given to Mr. Vergara about the known risk of injury. Union Pacific's doctors initially diagnosed Mr. Vergara's injuries as a "mild sprain;' but his family doctor realized he had serious injuries and Mr. Vergara ultimately underwent back surgery in the form of a right L4-L5-$ 1 hemilaminotomy, facetectomy and foraminotomy with microsurgical discectomy. As a result of these injuries, Mr. Vergara could not return to work for Union Pacific. While off disabled from work, the railroad also terminated Mr. Vergara due to his failure to provide updated medical information while he was on a leave of absence. At the time of trial, Mr. Vergara's vocational expert testified that after a training program he could obtain employment as a logistics coordinator. Despite his inability to work as a trainman, the railroad's lawyers argued that Mr. Vergara was entitled to no more than $800.00 for his lost earnings, because the railroad's doctors thought the surgery he under- went was not caused by the incident and was instead due to his history of chronic back problems. The railroad also offered surveillance video and relied heavily on printouts from Mr. Vergara's Facebook page, where he had posted photographs of his post-accident activities, including frequent fishing. Before trial, the railroad offered $200,000.00 to settle Mr. Vergara's case. This offer was rejected and after a two week trial, the jury deliberated for a day and a half before returning a gross verdict of $850,000.00. The jury also determined that Mr. Vergara was partially at fault for the incident "for yanking on the cut lever" resulting in a net verdict of $569,500.00. Mr. Vergara was represented at trial by Victor A. Russo of Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson, Inc. © HILDEBRAND McLEOD & NELSON INC. I www.hmnlaw.com
  • 4. ATTORNEYS & OFFICES FELA VERDICT: $3,081,600.00 $3,081,600.00 FELA Jury Verdict - December 14, 2012 1 Winckler v. BNSF Railway Company Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson, Inc. 1 Attorneys Anthony S. Petru & Jason J. Romero Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona Mr. Joseph Winckler suffered severe injuries to his knee and Injury to Right Knee, 1st & 2nd Surgeries, Joseph Winckler ankle on May 29, 2007 when he was stepping down from a Current Condition Medial compartment of knee with loss locomotive in Winslow, Arizona. He stepped down onto a tie of cartilage & narrowing of that was longer than standard ties because the tie was part of join/space an approach to a fueling rack in BNSF's Winslow Yard. BNSF had failed to properly dress the tie with ballast or other material up to the top of the tie, as depicted in BNSF's own engineering diagrams, and Mr. Winckler's knee and ankle were caused to twist as he stepped down. The incident was Frayed, degenerated immediately reported and Mr. Winckler was eventually lateral meniscus - ••.••• ~, •••~. disabled from work as a conductor for BNSF. Surgical resection of media/meniscus {partial), Without work as a conductor, he went to work as a trainmas- irfrapatellar plica ter trainee for BNSF in Winslow, but BNSF failed to offer him a permanent position at the end of his six month training period. As a result, he was forced to go back to his prior line of work to support his family, working as a wildland firefighter. Ultimately, he could not continue this work because of his knee injuries. Thereafter, he moved throughout the country chasing non-railroad work and struggling for years before trial to make ends meet to support his family. While he was off work, he also continued to apply for jobs with BNSF, and attempted to work directly with BNSF's vocational manager without any success until shortly before trial when BNSF offered him a yardmaster trainee position in Seattle, Washington. At the time of the trial he was working as a yardmaster trainee, but was not fully qualified as a yardmaster and had not received a yardmaster seniority date. Following his yardmaster training, it was unlikely he could hold a permanent position as a yardmaster because of his lack of yardmaster seniority. Following a three week trial in Phoenix, Arizona, the jury found BNSF liable for Mr. Winckler's injuries and returned a verdict of $3,852,000.00, less a finding of 20% contributory negligence by Mr. Winckler, resulting in a net verdict for Mr. Winckler in the amount of $3,081 ,600.00. Before trial, BNSF's "last and final" offer to settle the case was $75,000.00. Mr. Winckler was represented at trial by Anthony S. Petru of Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson, Inc. and Jason J. Romero. © HILDEBRAND McLEOD & NELSON INC. I www.hmnlaw.com
  • 5. Medical Insurance Information & Revocation of Health Information Release to Employer I. Insurance Coverage Not Through Workers' Compensation To Whom It May Concern: I, , am an employee with Union Pacific railroad. As a railroad employee, I am NOT covered by workers' compensation; rather on-duty injuries for railroad employees are governed by the Federal Employer's Liability Act ("FELA") under 45 U.S.C. §§ 51, et seq. My medical bills are paid through my employee group health insurance policy; there is no workers' compensation coverage. You are not required to get my employer's authorization for my medical treatment. Date: ------- Signed: _ Print name: ------------------- II. I Do Not Authorize the Release of My Health Information to My Employer To Whom It May Concern: I, , do not authorize my health care provider, _____ -::-- _ -:-:::- _ ' to release any of my health information to my employer, Union Pacific. In other words, I affirmatively instruct my above-named health care provider not to release any of my health information to my employer. I hereby revoke any past authorizations for the release of my health information to my employer. I also instruct my health care provider to contact me immediately if any person affiliated with Union Pacific requests my health information. These instructions remain in effect indefinitely, unless I authorize a release of records to my employer in writing and pursuant to HIPPA under 45 CFR Parts 160 and 164. Date: -------- Signed: _ Print name: -------------------