Presentation from BILETA 2010

1. Collaborative Consent Harnessing the strengths of the Internet for consent in the online environment

4. Tendency towards secrecy

7. Works at the ISP level

9. Data Protection

10. Fraud , defamation, passing off, trademark infringement

13. Secret trials!

14. Perceived as ‘anti-privacy’

15. Abandoned by business allies

16. Challenges from Europe

18. Phorm took, but didn’t give

19. Not the Google model

21. That means that, one way or another, you need consent

24. Scrolled-through, unread ‘clickwrap’

25. Browsed-through, unnoticed ‘browse-wrap’

26. ‘One off’ consent – gained when you first sign up

28. Obligations – legal or international

29. Where there is an overwhelming societal need or benefit

31. Where there is any doubt, the rights of the individual should get the benefit of that doubt

33. Does it mean that an ‘informed decision’ needs to be enabled?

35. The internet is a communications medium

36. The internet supplies information

37. The internet works continuously in real time

39. Then, turn consent into a communicative collaboration

40. Data gatherers provide information

41. Alerts when data is gathered

42. Alerts when things change

45. Google dashboard

46. Google Ads Preferences

48. Rights to be consulted

49. Rights to withdraw or revoke consent

52. For programming ‘intelligent agents’?Perhaps no future – but if there is a future, it should be on the customers’ terms.

54. Superficial consent is scarcely better than no consent at all

55. Making consent a collaborative process could be a useful first stepPaul Bernal – p.a.bernal@lse.ac.uk