The document discusses differentiation strategies for students of varying ability levels in the classroom. It suggests using pre-tests or elicitation activities to determine each student's level, then differentiating the content, process, product, or learning environment. Specifically, it recommends differentiating through modifying tasks to be more complex/abstract, products to solve real problems for real audiences, and processes to incorporate more high-level thinking. Modifying entry documents or offering optional workshops can support special needs students. An example task on designing electronic games allows for differentiation in programming, classrooms, and rubrics.
6. Won ’ t these students achieve anyway? Students not challenged Behaviour issues Finish work within a period for a whole project Given “ more ” work Or Peer Tutoring Still bored.
7. How do you know who is in your class? Pretest OR “ Elicitation Activity ”
All students fit somewhere on this continum, and within any non-streamed class, you will encounter a range of student abilities about 3-4 years either way of the year group you are teaching. In my class at the moment, I have a student that is operating at university level, and one that reads at a 7 year old level. As teachers, it is our responsibility to teach to all levels of the class Research suggests, however, that most teachers teach at a level that is below grade level for their class. Therefore, some students are being taught significantly below their grade level and are actually never learning. The problem still exists, however, as to how to teach 3 different level of ability within one class. And even within each level, you can have a myriad of different needs within the group.
All students fit somewhere on this continum, and within any non-streamed class, you will encounter a range of student abilities about 3-4 years either way of the year group you are teaching. In my class at the moment, I have a student that is operating at university level, and one that reads at a 7 year old level. As teachers, it is our responsibility to teach to all levels of the class Research suggests, however, that most teachers teach at a level that is below grade level for their class. Therefore, some students are being taught significantly below their grade level and are actually never learning. The problem still exists, however, as to how to teach 3 different level of ability within one class. And even within each level, you can have a myriad of different needs within the group.
Every student has the right to learn not just achieve. Students that aren ’ t challenged with more difficult work will traditionally underachieve These underachievers then become behaviour issues in the class because they are bored. Students will either underacheive to fit the forced choice dilema…to fit in with their peers OR Do the bare minimum to get an acceptable level. Either way, this leads to decreased engagement. Research suggests that gifted students that are disengaged within the classroom often sre more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol and drop out of school early.
Preheating for existing student knowledge is the quickest way to unrstand where the gaps in the classes knowledge are. If most of the class knows it already, you don't need to teach it. Yoiu could run small optional tutorials for those students that do not already have that content (ie, focus groups.) Call the elicitation activities, not tests. They don't have to be s traditional paper test either. Peeresses could be any type of performance activity that tests the outcomes you are trying to scheme.
Leading researchers suggest that if you are going to do one thing for gifted students, PBL has the most advantages, as it integrates a number of key concepts from different gifted theorists Maker, June (1982) Curriculum Development for the Gifted, Austin, TX, Pro Ed
Leading researchers suggest that if you are going to do one thing for gifted students, PBL has the most advantages, as it integrates a number of key concepts from different gifted theorists Maker, June (1982) Curriculum Development for the Gifted, Austin, TX, Pro Ed
Leading researchers suggest that if you are going to do one thing for gifted students, PBL has the most advantages, as it integrates a number of key concepts from different gifted theorists Maker, June (1982) Curriculum Development for the Gifted, Austin, TX, Pro Ed
All students fit somewhere on this continum, and within any non-streamed class, you will encounter a range of student abilities about 3-4 years either way of the year group you are teaching. In my class at the moment, I have a student that is operating at university level, and one that reads at a 7 year old level. As teachers, it is our responsibility to teach to all levels of the class Research suggests, however, that most teachers teach at a level that is below grade level for their class. Therefore, some students are being taught significantly below their grade level and are actually never learning. The problem still exists, however, as to how to teach 3 different level of ability within one class. And even within each level, you can have a myriad of different needs within the group.
Often, we will do things together as a whole group, but then may split tasks. In this example, the types of control structures were split amongst groups of students so that each student was doing all three control strucutres, but at a differentiated level. Each group would then present back to the class, with questions asked by the teacher to tease out the differences between the types of repititoin usd, etc. Curriculum…tasks, collection of tasks
This means that students actually get marked for showing advanced skills…or they can get similar marks for showing more basic skills.