Implications and Perspectives on Academic Dishonesty
•Als PPTX, PDF herunterladen•
0 gefällt mir•1,708 views
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (10)
Ähnlich wie Implications and Perspectives on Academic Dishonesty
Ähnlich wie Implications and Perspectives on Academic Dishonesty (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Implications and Perspectives on Academic Dishonesty
- 1. Implications and Perspectives on Cheating 0
- 2. Troubling Statistics Out of every 1,000 students at your campus, 750 have admitted to cheating, 15have been caught and only 7 have received any kind of academic penalty.* An unwinnable battle? *According to studies done by Josephson Institute of Ethics 1
- 3. The Stereotypical Cheater Profiles 2 Social Groups Behaviors
- 4. There is a gap between what we know about cheater profiles and what institutions do to reduce the incidence of cheating. 3
- 5. Three types of students 4 Group 1 Always Honest Group 2 Habitual Cheaters
- 7. Perception
- 9. The Cheating Virus 7
- 10. The Cheating Virus 8
- 11. The Cheating Virus 9
- 12. The Cheating Virus 10
- 13. Life-Long Implications of Cheating Students who are dishonest in class are more likely to engage in fraud and theft when they enter the workplace. 11 SarathNonis and Cathy Owens Swift, "An Examination of the Relationship between Academic Dishonesty and Workplace Dishonesty”, Journal of Business Education 77, no. 2, (November-December 2001), 69-77. Sims, R.L. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68(4), 207-211
- 14. Life-Long Implications of Cheating Students who cheat cannot perform roles for which they were hired. 12
- 15. Degree Dilution 13 Academic dishonesty hurts general employability and the potential for promotions. Bernard, E. W. (2002). Academic Dishonesty: An Educators Guide. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc Publishers 5-8.
- 16. Cheating Impacts Your Institution Reputation Lower quality faculty and students Donations suffer 14
- 17. Faculty Beliefs About Cheating 15 86% believe students cheat at least occasionally!
- 20. Local, county and state campaigns, increase national seat belt usage to 15%
- 21. Education + Mild Enforcement (1990)
- 23. Local, county and state campaigns, increase national seat belt usage to 15%
- 24. Education + Mild Enforcement (1990)
- 25. “Secondary safety seat belt laws” passes in 38 states. National usage rate climbs to 50%
- 26. Education + “Click It or Ticket” (2004)
- 29. Which courses?
- 30. Which assignments?We are not a webcam company!
- 32. Plagiarism 2.0
- 33. CollusionHow we help institutions Cheating Analytics 21 We are not a webcam company!
- 34. Shaun Sims shaunsims@digitalproctor.com (512) 921-6138 22
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Those with higher grade point averages (GPAs) tend to be less likely to cheat. Older, non-traditional students tend to cheat less than their younger counterparts. Those involved in campus organizations like the Greek system and athletic teams are more likely to cheat than their peers (Carpenter, Harding, Finelli, Montgomery & Passow, 2006).
- Student with devil on shoulder, student with angel on shoulder, and then a student with both [great visual!]
- This slide helps Transition from student/self to student/studentShow animation of other red desks lighting up. Then show a pocket of green desks and try to get audience to sympathize with that student (When honest students discover cheaters escaping detection, it can discourage student morale, as they see the rewards for their work cheapened. *) *Lawrence M. Hinman – Virtual Virtues: Reflections on Academic Integrity in the Age of the Internet* Innes, Mitra, Is Dishonesty Contagious?, June 26, 2009**Douglas N. Bunn, Steven B. Caudill, and Daniel M. Gropper, "Crime in the Classroom: An Economic Analysis of Undergraduate Student Cheating Behavior", The Journal of Economic Education 23, no. 3, (Summer 1992), 204***McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001b, January/February). Dishonesty in academic environments. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(1), 29-46.
- This slide helps Transition from student/self to student/studentShow animation of other red desks lighting up. Then show a pocket of green desks and try to get audience to sympathize with that student (When honest students discover cheaters escaping detection, it can discourage student morale, as they see the rewards for their work cheapened. *) *Lawrence M. Hinman – Virtual Virtues: Reflections on Academic Integrity in the Age of the Internet* Innes, Mitra, Is Dishonesty Contagious?, June 26, 2009**Douglas N. Bunn, Steven B. Caudill, and Daniel M. Gropper, "Crime in the Classroom: An Economic Analysis of Undergraduate Student Cheating Behavior", The Journal of Economic Education 23, no. 3, (Summer 1992), 204***McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001b, January/February). Dishonesty in academic environments. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(1), 29-46.
- This slide helps Transition from student/self to student/studentShow animation of other red desks lighting up. Then show a pocket of green desks and try to get audience to sympathize with that student (When honest students discover cheaters escaping detection, it can discourage student morale, as they see the rewards for their work cheapened. *) *Lawrence M. Hinman – Virtual Virtues: Reflections on Academic Integrity in the Age of the Internet* Innes, Mitra, Is Dishonesty Contagious?, June 26, 2009**Douglas N. Bunn, Steven B. Caudill, and Daniel M. Gropper, "Crime in the Classroom: An Economic Analysis of Undergraduate Student Cheating Behavior", The Journal of Economic Education 23, no. 3, (Summer 1992), 204***McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001b, January/February). Dishonesty in academic environments. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(1), 29-46.
- This slide helps Transition from student/self to student/studentShow animation of other red desks lighting up. Then show a pocket of green desks and try to get audience to sympathize with that student (When honest students discover cheaters escaping detection, it can discourage student morale, as they see the rewards for their work cheapened. *) *Lawrence M. Hinman – Virtual Virtues: Reflections on Academic Integrity in the Age of the Internet* Innes, Mitra, Is Dishonesty Contagious?, June 26, 2009**Douglas N. Bunn, Steven B. Caudill, and Daniel M. Gropper, "Crime in the Classroom: An Economic Analysis of Undergraduate Student Cheating Behavior", The Journal of Economic Education 23, no. 3, (Summer 1992), 204***McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001b, January/February). Dishonesty in academic environments. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(1), 29-46.
- This slide helps Transition from student/self to student/studentShow animation of other red desks lighting up. Then show a pocket of green desks and try to get audience to sympathize with that student (When honest students discover cheaters escaping detection, it can discourage student morale, as they see the rewards for their work cheapened. *) *Lawrence M. Hinman – Virtual Virtues: Reflections on Academic Integrity in the Age of the Internet* Innes, Mitra, Is Dishonesty Contagious?, June 26, 2009**Douglas N. Bunn, Steven B. Caudill, and Daniel M. Gropper, "Crime in the Classroom: An Economic Analysis of Undergraduate Student Cheating Behavior", The Journal of Economic Education 23, no. 3, (Summer 1992), 204***McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001b, January/February). Dishonesty in academic environments. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(1), 29-46.
- Bernard, E. W. (2002). Academic Dishonesty: An Educators Guide. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc Publishers 5-8.
- 86% of faculty believe that students cheat in online courses at least occasionally0% believed that students never cheated“Notions of independent thinking, intellectual property, the struggle of original thought, and academic freedom are all at risk should dishonesty prevail over integrity,” Ultimately, all of academia suffers.
- We believe that even one member of the campus community can make a difference,and that change need not take years to show its effects.The nature and feel of the campus community environment—the campus ethos—isa powerful influence on individual student’s attitudes toward cheating. If studentsperceive their campus as merely providing a means to an end—and as unjust, disjointed,laissez faire, impersonal, and without a core identity—deterrents to cheatingmay be very weak.