1. Persistent heartburn in a patient on PPI
Samir Haffar M.D.
Associate Professor of Gastroenterology
Al-Mouassat University Hospital â Damascus â Syria
2. Clinical History â 1
36-year-old woman with 6-year history of heartburn
Symptoms occurred from 3 times/day to 3 times/week
Symptoms occasionally awaken her from sleep during night
No dysphagia, chest pain, epigastric pain, bloating, or vomiting
Good appetite, no weight loss, denies smoking or drinking alcohol
Social worker, married, 2 toddlers at home
Considered her work & her family life to be very stressful
Unremarkable physical examination except for borderline obesity
3. Clinical History â 2
⢠Seen by her primary care physician: lifestyle modifications, lose
weight, less busy work schedule, & H2RA twice daily
⢠No improvement despite 2 months of therapy with H2RA
Unable to lose weight or change her work schedule
⢠Three months ago: PPI once daily half an hour before breakfast
⢠PPI help during first 2 weeks, symptoms recurred with less severity
She takes antacids, OTC H2RA, & another PPI before bedtime
4. Persistent heartburn in a patient on PPI
ď Definition of refractory GERD
ď Putative mechanisms for refractory GERD
ď Diagnostic options for refractory GERD
ď¸ Therapeutic approaches of refractory GERD
ďš Recommendations
6. What constitutes refractory GERD?
⢠PPI one or twice daily Most investigators: bid
Some investigators: qd
⢠Duration 8 weeks in EE
4 weeks in NERD
Patients who failed to obtain satisfactory symptomatic
response &/or complete esophageal healing after a
full course of standard dose PPI (once a day)
EE: Ersosive esophagitis
NERD: Non Ersosive Reflux disease
Fass R et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005 ; 22 : 79 â 94.
7. Refractory GERD in each of the GERD groups
Fass R et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005 ; 22 : 79 â 94.
10 â 40% of patients fail to respond symptomatically,
either partially or completely, to a standard dose PPI
8. Symptomatic response to PPI in NERD
PPIs once daily for 4 weeks
Response correlated with extent of esophageal acid exposure
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000 ; 14 : 597 â 602.
9. Healing failure in patients with EE
PPI qd for 8 weeks
Richter JE et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 ; 96 : 3089 â 98.
Patients might continue to report GERD symptoms despite
complete healing of esophageal mucosa (up to 15%)
11. Underlying mechanisms for persistent
heartburn despite treatment with PPIs
Fass R & Sifrim D. Gut 2009 ; 58 : 295 â 309.
10 â 40 % of patients
12. ⢠Non compliance
⢠Improper dosing time
⢠Reduced PPI bioavailability
⢠Rapid PPI metabolism
⢠PPI resistance
Putative mechanisms for failure of PPI
Related to PPIs
Fass R. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008 ; 6 : 393 â 400.
Unrelated to PPIs
⢠Weakly acidic or alcaline reflux
⢠Bile reflux (DGER)
⢠Esophageal hypersensitivity
⢠Nocturnal reflux
⢠HP infection
⢠Delayed gastric emptying
⢠Eosinophilic esophagitis
⢠Psychological co-morbidity
⢠Others (unrelated to GERD)
13. Non compliance
Most common cause for PPI failure
⢠GERD is a symptom-driven disease
⢠By end of 6 months, 30% of patients still consume PPIs
⢠Factors of compliance Presence or absence of symptoms
Severity of symptoms
Personal preference
⢠Compliance should be assessed in all patients with
refractory GERD prior to ordering any evaluative test
14. Dosing time of PPIs
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000 ; 14 : 1267 â 1272.
21 volunteers taking PPI each morning
Either 15 min before breakfast or without food or drink
On day 7, intragastric pH-metry from 8:00 to 16:00 ( 8-h period)
17.2%
IQR: 4.6 â 45.5
42.0%
IQR: 31.4 â 48.8
P Ë= 0.01
16. ⢠Non compliance
⢠Improper dosing time
⢠Reduced PPI bioavailability
⢠Rapid PPI metabolism
⢠PPI resistance
Putative mechanisms for failure of PPI
Related to PPIs
Fass R. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008 ; 6 : 393 â 400.
Unrelated to PPIs
⢠Weakly acidic or alcaline reflux
⢠Bile reflux (DGER)
⢠Esophageal hypersensitivity
⢠Nocturnal reflux
⢠HP infection
⢠Delayed gastric emptying
⢠Eosinophilic esophagitis
⢠Psychological comorbidity
⢠Others (unrelated to GERD)
17. Esophageal pH monitoring
⢠Catheter esophageal pH monitoring
Wireless esophageal pH monitoring (Bravo capsule)
⢠Quantitative (DeMeester) & qualitative analysis (SI â SAP)
⢠off PPIs Test if initial diagnosis correct
on PPIs Test if symptoms due to residual acid (PPIs bid)
⢠Positive pH Heartburn related to acid reflux
Negative pH, positive SI Heartburn related to acid reflux
Negative pH, negative SI Heartburn not related to acid reflux
18. 24 h catheter esophageal pH monitoring
5 cm above LES
19. Normal 24 h esophageal pH monitoring
Quantitative analysis
Qualitative analysis
Bremner CG et al. Esophageal disease & testing. Taylor & Francis Group, 2005.
20. Composite scoring systems
Johnson & DeMeester is the most commonly used
Percentage of total time pH < 4
Percentage of upright time pH < 4
Percentage of supine time pH < 4
Number of reflux episodes
Number of reflux episodes >5 min
Longest reflux episode
DeMeester score
Normal ⤠14,72
21. Mean SD Median Minimum Maximum 95th %
Total time at pH < 4 (%) 1.5 1.4 1.2 0 6.0 4.5
Upright time at pH< 4 (%) 2.2 2.3 1.6 0 9.3 8.4
Supine time at pH< 4 (%) 0.6 1.0 0.1 0 4.0 3.5
Number or reflux episodes 19.0 12.8 16.0 2.0 56.0 46.9
Number of episodes > 5 min 0.8 1.2 0 0 5.0 3.5
Longest episode (min) 6.7 7.9 4.0 0 46.0 19.8
Composite score 6.0 4.4 5.0 0.4 18.0 14.7
Normal values of DeMeesterâs score
50 healthy volunteers
DeMeester TR et al. Ann Surg 1976 ; 184 : 459 â 470.
22. Qualitative analysis
Symptomâreflux correlation
⢠Symptom index: Positive if ⼠50%
⢠Symptom sensitivity index: Positive if > 10 %
⢠Symptom association probability Positive if > 95%
Determine relationship between heartburn episodes & acid
reflux events, regardless if pH test is normal or abnormal
23. Percentage of total time pH < 4
Normal values
⢠Off therapy
5 cm above LES
20 cm above LES 1 %
Periods of meals or acidic beverages excluded
⢠On therapy
5 cm above LES
20 cm above LES ?
* Based on 95% CI obtained in healthy subjects treated with omeprazole 40 mg qd
Kuo B et al. Am J Gastroenterol 1996 ; 91 : 1532 â 8.
4 â 5.5 %
1.6 â 4 %*
24. Abnormal acid exposure time in heartburn
Disease Percentage of total time pH < 4
Barrettâs esophagus 93 %
* ENRD Endoscpic Negative Reflux Disease
* *NERD Non Erosive Reflux Disease
Erosive esophagitis 75 % (in one study)
ENRD*
NERD**
Functional heartburn
- SI > 50%
- SI < 50%
50 %
100 %
0 %
Hypersensitive esophagus
Non acid reflux or motor event
25. 24 hour pH monitoring is not the
gold standard for diagnosis of GERD
26. Bravo system (Medtronics)
Esophageal Probe
25 x 6 x 5.5 mm
Battery
pH
electrode
Suction
chamber
Radio
transmitter
Delivery system
Receiver
100 x 70 x 30 mm - 165 g
27. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring
Bravo capsule â 48 hours
Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2005 ; 15 : 307 â 318.
Patients might have normal test on day 1 & abnormal test on day 2
Increase sensitivity to detect symptoms correlated with acid reflux
More studies needed in patients with refractory GERD
28. Bravo normal values
50 asymptomatic volunteers
1st 24 h 2nd 24 h
Mean
(+ SD)
95th
percentile
Mean
(+ SD)
95th
percentile
% total time at pH < 4 1.79 (2.16 5.89 1.78 (1.78) 5.64
% upright time at pH < 4 2.45 (3.14) 7.81 2.54 (2.57) 7.46
% supine time at pH < 4 0.37 (1.18) 1.58 0.34 (1.28) 1.29
Number of reflux episodes 21.2 (18.5) 55.30 22.3 (19.8) 56.15
No of reflux episodes >5 min 0.62 (1.21) 3.55 0.75 (1.15) 3.00
Longest reflux episode 3.79 (4.31) 11.23 5.95 (4.52) 17.03
DeMeester score 6.02 (4.82) 15.93 5.95 (4.52) 15.48
29. pH testing in refractory GERD
Very few studies
⢠Catheter pH monitoring1
PPI qd Limited value (normal test in 70%)
PPI bid Non-contributory value (normal test in 96%)
⢠Wireless pH monitoring
2 days: Normal test on both days in 65%
4 days3: More studies needed
High failure rate: 25%
1 Charbel S et al. . Am J Gastroenterol 2005 ; 100 : 283 â 9.
2Hirano I et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005 ; 3 : 1083 â 8.
30. Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance
Antegrade bolus movement during swallowing
Progression of impedance from proximal to distal
Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2005 ; 15 : 257 â 264.
31. Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance
Retrograde bolus movement observed in reflux
Progression of impedance from distal to proximal
Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2005 ; 15 : 257 â 264.
32. Advantages of MII
⢠Direction of bolus Anterograde â retrograde
⢠Content of refluxate Liquid â Gas â Mixed
⢠Height of refluxate Related to volume of refluxate
⢠pH characteristics Acid reflux
(combined MII-pH) Weekly acid reflux
Weekly alkaline reflux
Acid re-reflux
33. Combined MII-pH probe
⢠Impedance orifices
3, 5, 7, 9, 15, & 17 cm from the tip
⢠pH orifice
5 cm from the tip
⢠Ө MII-pH probe = Ө pH probe
Do not change patient comfort
Bremner CG et al. Esophageal disease & testing.
Taylor & Francis Group, NY, 1st edition, 2005.
34. âSleuthâ monitor â Sandhill
Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance with pH sensor
âSleuthâ monitor attached to the catheter
& worn around a belt during the recording period
35. ⢠Analysis similar to esophageal pH monitoring
- Quantitative analysis
- Qualitative analysis: SI â SSI â SAP
⢠Healthy: Total no of reflux: 40 per 24 h
1/3 acid & 2/3 weakly acidic or alkaline
⢠Negative study rules out GERD as cause of symptoms
Esophageal MII-pH monitoring
Most sensitive method for reflux detection
36. GERD classification by combined MII-pH
⢠Acid reflux
Reflux with drop of pH from above 4.0 to below 4.0
⢠Superimposed acid reflux (Acid re-reflux)
Acid reflux occurs while pH < 4.0
⢠Weakly acidic reflux
Reflux results in esophageal pH between 4.0 & 7.0
⢠Weakly alkaline reflux
Reflux with nadir esophageal pH does not drop < 7.0
Sifrim D et al. Gut 2004 ; 53 ; 1024 â 1031.
37. Combined MII-pH of the esophagus
Fass R & Sifrim D. Gut 2009 ; 58 : 295 â 309.
Weakly acidic reflux
4 ⤠pH < 7
Weakly alkaline reflux
pH ⼠7
38. MII-pH in refractory GERD
⢠Shift from acidic reflux to weakly acidic reflux
Regurgitation become predominant symptom
⢠off PPI Little value when compared with pH (10%)
on PPI Improved diagnostic yield by 20%
⢠Positive SI for acid reflux 10%
Positive SI for non-acid reflux 37%
Mainie I et al. Gut 2006 ; 55 : 1398 â 402.
Zerbib F et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 ; 101 : 1956 â 63.
40. Esophageal Bilitec
Must be accompanied by 24 h esophageal pH
⢠Fiberoptic probe to detect bilirubin (450 nm absorption)
⢠Presented as per cent time bilirubin absorbance > 0.14
⢠Progressive increase in DGOR across spectrum of GERD
Particularly high prevalence in patients with Barrettâs
⢠Medtronic stops commercialization of the product
41. Esophageal pH & Bilitec study
Maximal bile reflux in the esophagus during supine period
Bremner CG et al. Esophageal disease & testing. Taylor & Francis Group, 2005.
Limited evidence of increase in DGER in refractory GERD
42. % of time with bilirubin absorbance > 0.14
Duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux
Vaezi MF et al. Gastroenterology 1996 ; 111 : 1192 â 9.
0.4%
3.2%
14.6%
23%
46%
43. Visceral hypersensitivity
Not specifically studied in refractory GERD
⢠Most patients have NERD or functional heartburn
⢠Heartburn associated with weakly acidic reflux
⢠Lower perception thresholds for pain
Balloon esophageal distention
Electrical stimulation
⢠Dilated intercellular spaces
Promotes higher activation of sensory nerve endings
44. Dilated intercellular spaces (DIS)
⢠Higher activation of sensory nerve endings
⢠Nonspecific Asymptomatic subjects
Candida infection of esophagus
Food allergy
Eosinophilic oesophagitis
Esophageal cancer
⢠Disappearance of DIS & symptoms resolution after PPI
⢠NERD patients refractory to PPI have persistence of DIS
45. Dilated intercellular spaces
Rabbit oesophageal mucosa at electron microscopy
Farre R et al. Gut 2008 ; 57 :1366 â 74.
Acid-pepsin solution at pH 5.0
Acid-pepsin solution at pH 5.0
plus deoxycholic acid 2 mmol/l
46. Nocturnal acid breakthrough
Combined esophageal & gastric 24 h pH monitoring
Gastric pH < 4 for ⼠60 min despite twice daily PPI
Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2005; 15: 289 - 306.
75% of GERD patients & healthy subjects on PPI bid
No correlation between NAB & nocturnal GERD symptoms
47. Delayed gastric emptying
⢠Few studies evaluates frequency of gastric emptying
in refractory GERD
⢠Rapidly growing number of patients with DM & those
using narcotics for pain syndrome might soon make
gastroparesis one of the leading causes of PPI failure
48. Diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis
Relatively uncommon disorder
⢠Clinical symptoms of esophageal dysfunction:
Dysphagia, food impaction, refractory GERD, chest pain
⢠15 eosinophils in 1 high-power field
⢠Lack of responsiveness to high-dose PPI
or normal pH monitoring of distal esophagus
Furuta GT et al. Gastroenterology 2007 ; 133 : 1342 â 1363.
49. Endoscopic images of eosinophilic esophagitis
Linear furrows &
adherent white exudatesConcentric rings
Small calibre esophagus
with stricture
Mucosal laceration from
Diagnostic endoscopy
50. Eosinophilic esophagitis
The ringed esophagus
Hiatus hernia
Lower esophageal ring
Adjacent ring
Zimmerman SL et al. Radiology 2005 ; 236 : 159 â 165.
Most patients have esophageal strictures
with distinctive ring-like indentations
Smooth stricture with
distinctive rings
51. Psychological comorbidity
Patients with poor symptom-reflux correlation
exhibit significant psychosocial morbidities
⢠High level of anxiety
⢠Hysteria
⢠Depression
52. Other diseases unrelataded to GERD
Rarely confused with GERD
⢠Pill-induced esophagitis
⢠Skin diseases with esophageal manifestations
⢠Zollinger-Ellison syndrome
⢠Achalasia
54. Diagnostic techniques for refractory heartburn
⢠UGI Endoscopy Low diagnostic yield
⢠pH testing PPI qd: limited value
PPI bid: non-contributory value
⢠MII-pH Best diagnostic tool on PPI
⢠Bilitec 2000 Limited evidence
55. UGI endoscopy
First test used in clinical practice for refractory GERD
⢠Normal endoscopy (most frequent)
⢠Esophageal erosions
⢠Pill-induced esophagitis
⢠Infectious esophagitis
⢠Zollinger-Ellison syndrome
⢠Eosinophilic esophagitis
Very low diagnostic yield if no alarm symptoms
ASGE guidelines. Gastrointest Endosc 2007 ; 66 : 219 â 24.
56. Erosive esophagitis in refractory GERD & untreated patients
Poh CH et al. Gastrointest Endosc 2010 ; 71 : 28 â 34.
OR of erosive esophagitis in refractory GERD: 0.11 (95% CI: 0.04-0.30)
Eosinophilic esophagitis: 0.9% of refractory GERD
Cross-sectional study
105 refractory GERD â 91 untreated patints
58. Therapeutic approaches of refractory GERD
⢠Compliance & dosing time
⢠Lifestyle modifications
⢠Proton-Pump Inhibitors (PPI)
⢠H2RA at bedtime
⢠Baclofen
⢠Promotility drugs & bile acid binders
⢠Pain modulators
⢠Endoscopic treatment for GERD
⢠Antireflux surgery
⢠Alternative medicine
First management
Standard of care
59. Compliance & proper dosing time
Evaluation of proper compliance and adequate dosing
time should be the first management when assessing
patients with heartburn who are not responding to PPIs
before instituting any other intervention
60. Lifestyle modifications
⢠Only weight loss and elevation of the bed head are
effective in improving GERD
⢠Insufficient data to support other lifestyle modifications
Kaltenbach T et al. Arch Intern Med 2006 ; 166 : 965 â 71.
Recent systematic review of all publications
It is reasonable to recommend avoidance of specific
lifestyle activities identified by patients or physicians
to trigger GERD-related symptoms
61. Proton pump inhibitors
⢠Switching to another PPI
⢠Doubling the PPI dose
½ hour before breakfast & before dinner
Increase in overall symptom relief by 25%
No evidence for further escalation of PPI dose
Two therapeutic strategies
âStandard of careâ
62. H2RAs at bedtime
⢠Retrospective study: 56 pts â PPIs bid + H2RAs at bedtime*
72% long term improvement in overall symptoms
⢠Good experience accumulated so far with H2RA for GERD
Rackoff A et al. Dis Esophagus 2005 ; 18 : 370 â 3.
⢠H2RAs might improve GERD-related symptoms in long
term in substantial number of patients
⢠If clinical tolerance: H2RAs intermittently or on demand
63. TLESR
Primary mechanism of reflux in health & GERD
Three characteristics:
ď Non-swallow induced
ď Prolonged
ď Triggered by fundic distension
64. Baclofen*
TLESR reducers
⢠Mechanisms Reduced reflux episodes by 40%
Increased LES basal pressure
Accelerated gastric emptying
⢠Doses Up to 20 mg tid
⢠Side effects Central nervous system side effects
Somnolence, confusion, trembling
Important limiting factor in routine usage
⢠Indications Weakly acidic reflux by MII-pH
Regurgitation, or sour/ bitter taste in mouth
* Gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor agonists
65. Promotility drugs & bile acid binders
Promotility drugs
⢠Attractive option in delayed gastric emptying
⢠No available data in GERD patients who failed PPIs
Cholestyramine or sucralfate
⢠Unclear if any of the currently available bile acid binders
are sufficiently efficacious to improve symptoms
66. Visceral pain modulators
⢠No studies in GERD patients with refractory heartburn
⢠Attractive option Most patients from NERD group
Lack of weakly or acidic reflux
⢠Tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone, & SSRIs
⢠Used in non-mood-altering doses
⢠Same recommendations for non-cardiac chest pain
67. Endoscopic treatment for GERD
Interesting topic of investigation
⢠Requirements: efficacy, safety & durability
⢠Two promising techniques
Radiofrequency energy (Stretta) Refractory GERD
Endoluminal fundoplication Candidate for surgery
⢠Most studies open & uncontrolled with short-term results
⢠Few RCTs with less impressive results than open trials
Louis H et al. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2010 ; 24 : 969 â 979.
68. Stretta procedure
⢠109 patients refractory to PPI bid
⢠Endoscopic esophagitis or abnormal pH testing
⢠4-years follow-up
⢠Assessment: GERD HRQL questionnaire
Heartburn
Satisfaction
Percent without PPI
⢠Data on long-term follow-up (4 y): sustained improvement
Noar MD et al. Gastrointest Endosc 2007 ; 65 : 367 â 72.
69. Anti-reflux surgery
⢠Anti-reflux surgery in refractory GERD scarcely studied
⢠Careful selection of patients
Positive symptom-reflux correlation in MIIâpH on PPIs
Excellent results for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication
⢠Postsurgical follow-up relatively short
Mainie I et a. Br J Surg 2006 ; 93 : 1483 â 7.
del Genio G et al. J Gastrointest Surg 2008 ; 12 : 1491 â 6.
70. Alternative medicine
Acupuncture
⢠30 patients on PPI qd
Acupuncture biw vs doubling PPI dose/4week
Assessment: GERD symptoms diary â HRQoL by SF 36
Acupuncture more effective than doubling PPI dose
⢠Additional studies needed to demonstrate value of
acupuncture in this clinical situation
Dickman R et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26 : 1333 â 44.
71. Traditional Chinese Medicine acupuncture
points used in the treatment protocol
.
Dickman R et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26 : 1333 â 44.
Per.6 Neiguan
St.36 Zusanli
CV12 Zhangwan
CV17 Shanzhong
Liv.3 Taichong
Sp.9 Yinlingquan
72. Health-related quality of life
Assessment by Short Form 36
HRQol assessed by SF-36
SF-36 dimensions scored on a 0 (poor) to 100 (good) health scale
74. Recommendations
Patient failed full course of PPI once a day
⢠Excluding poor compliance & dosage timing
⢠Switch to another PPI or doubling the PPI dose
2-month course of treatment
⢠Maintenance treatment if asymptomatic on PPI bid
Same PPI dose inducing remission â PPI qd considered
⢠Lack of symptom improvement â 2 strategies
Based on MII-pH on treatment
Empirical therapy
75. Management strategy based on MII-pH
Positive for acid reflux (least common scenario)
⢠Review compliance & dosage timing
⢠H2RA at bedtime
Positive for weakly acidic reflux
⢠Baclofen Low dose & slow increase in dose approach
⢠Surgery Carefully selected patient
Positive SI in esophageal MIIâpH
Negative
⢠Pain modulators Tricyclics, trazodone, and SSRI
Same recommendations for NCCP
76. Empirical therapy for refractory GERD
MII-pH not available to many physicians
Patientâs predominant symptom might guide treatment
⢠Heartburn H2RA at bedtime
⢠Regurgitation or sour taste in mouth Baclofen
Anti-reflux surgery
⢠Still exhibits lack of response Pain modulators
Fass R. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008 ; 6 : 393 â 400.
77. Conclusion
⢠Compliance & dosing time should be evaluated first in patients
with heartburn not responsive to PPI
⢠In patients who failed PPI once daily, doubling PPI dose or
switching to another PPI are potential therapeutic strategies
⢠UGI endoscopy has very limited value if no alarm symptoms
⢠MII-pH monitoring on PPI provides best diagnostic tool:
Acid reflux H2RA
Weakly acidic reflux Baclofen â Anti-reflux surgery
No reflux Pain modulators
The non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) group, which accounts for most of the patients with GERD and demonstrates the lowest response rate to PPI once daily, is the main contributor for the PPI failure phenomenon.
It has been estimated that between 10% and 40% of patients with gastro-oeophageal reflux disease(GORD) fail to respond symptomatically, either partially or completely, to a standard dose proton pump inhibitor. What constitutes refractory GORD remains an area of controversy.Most investigators believe that only patients with GORD who exhibit partial or lack of response to PPIs twice daily should be considered as PPI failures.Other potential underlying mechanisms, such as reduced PPI bioavailability, rapid PPI metabolism and, specifically, mutations in the 2C19 isoform of cytochrome p450, PPI resistance, and Helicobacter pylori status have all been shown to play a limited role in PPI failure. Pill-induced oesophagitis, skin diseases with oesophageal involvement, ZollingerâEllison syndrome, and achalasia are very unusual causes for PPI failure and are rarely confused withGORD alone.
Presently, much of the research that is conducted in the area of refractory GORD focuses primarily on weakly acidic reflux, duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux, and oesophageal hypersensitivity.However, it is highly likely that GORD symptoms due to weakly acidic or duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux in patients who failed PPI treatment are related to oesophageal hypersensitivity.
Presently, much of the research that is conducted in the area of refractory GORD focuses primarily on weakly acidic reflux, duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux, and oesophageal hypersensitivity.However, it is highly likely that GORD symptoms due to weakly acidic or duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux in patients who failed PPI treatment are related to esophageal hypersensitivity.
Subgroups of Endoscopy-Negative reflux disease (ENRD)2 distinctive subgroups exist- Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) Functional heartburnThese groups are separated by the presence or absence of abnormal levels of acid reflux.
High failure rate (25%) of the wireless pH capsule- premature detachment- dropped signals- severe side effects
Using the wireless pH system, the 95th percentile for distal esophageal acid exposure for control subjects was 5.3%, a value higher than values reported in several although not all catheter-based system studies. The higher acid exposure threshold reported in healthy controls using the wireless pH system may be the consequence of less restriction in daily activities or the result of a thermal calibration error that existed in the pH catheter systems.The 48-h data could be interpreted using an average of the 2 days or only the 24-h period with the greatest acid exposure (worst day analysis). A significant increase in the sensitivity of pH testing and small decrease in specificity were evident when utilizingthe worst day data compared with either the initial 24-h or overall 48-h data in comparing controls with GERD patients.
High failure rate (25%) of the wireless pH capsule- premature detachment- dropped signals- severe side effects
A recent, multicenter study examined the impedance characteristics of 60 healthy subjects during 24-h ambulatory monitoring. Based on impedance values 5 cm above the LES, the median number of total reflux episodes per 24 h was 30, the majority of which occurred in the upright position.Approximately two-thirds of the episodes were acid and another third weakly acidic reflux. Weakly alkaline reflux was distinctly uncommon in this healthy cohort. Similar frequencies were recently reported from a multicenter European study. References:Shay S, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, et al. Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: A multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1037â43.Zerbib F, Bruley des Barannes S, Roman S, et al. 24 hour ambulatory esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH in healthy European subjects. Gastroenterology 2005;128:A396.
Weakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux is the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus with a pH between 4 and 7.Analyzed in a fashion similar to 24 h pH monitoring - Quantitative analysis - Qualitative analysis: SI or SAP
Duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) is the reflux of duodenal contents through the stomach and into the esophagus.A recent study demonstrated that DGER was significantly more common (64%) than acid reflux (37%) in patients who continued to have GERD-related symptoms on either standard dose or double-dose PPI therapy. Patients with EE who did not respond to PPI treatment experienced a higher number of DGER episodes (35 vs 15.5) and longer exposure time to DGER (11.9% vs 6.3%) than NERD patients in whom PPI therapy failed.
Basal cell hyperplasia Not confirmedPapillary elongation Not confirmed
Basal cell hyperplasia and papillary elongation have been suggested as markers of the disorder.However, subsequent studies have not confirmed their diagnostic value.
It has been hypothesized that NAB is the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism responsible for refractory GERD.NAB events do not demonstrate a temporal relationship with reflux-related symptoms.
Dysphagia, sometimes presenting as acute food impaction, is almost always present in patients with eosinophilicoesophagitis. In contrast, only about a third (range, 10â43%) of these patients also report classic heartburn symptoms. It is very uncommon for patients with eosinophilicoesophagitis to report heartburn as the sole symptom.The relationship between eosinophilicoesophagitis and GORD is unknown, although a recent study ruled that acid or non-acid reflux is a significant contributor to the pathogenesis of eosinophilicoesophagitis. An overlap between eosinophilicoesophagitis and GORD has also been proposed where both disorders coincide in the same individual. Regardless, eosinophilicoesophagitis is a relatively uncommon disorder and is thus unlikely to be responsible for a significant portion of those who do not respond to PPI treatment. Moreover,the prevalence of eosinophilicoesophagitis in GORD patients unresponsive to PPIs is still unknown.
In many cases, patients also report dysphagia or have a history of food impaction.Both should serve as alarm symptoms and the impetus for immediate upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.In addition, the relationship between GERD and eosinophilicesophagitis has not been fully explored. It is also possible that the 2 unrelated diagnoses might coincide in the same patient.Overall, eosinophilicesophagitis is relatively uncommon and is thus unlikely to be responsible for a significant portion of those who do not respond to PPI treatment.
Various evaluative tools are used in patients who failed PPI therapy, but most appear to have a very low clinical value or still lack supportive evidence for their routine usage in this challenging patient population. In addition, some of the diagnostic tests are still limited to a few centers of excellence and thus are not available to many practicing physicians. At the end, physicians will determine referral patterns for additional testingversus empirical treatment, on the basis of local availability of relevant resources.
Various evaluative tools are used in patients who failed PPI therapy, but most appear to have a very low clinical value or still lack supportive evidence for their routine usage in this challenging patient population. In addition, some of the diagnostic tests are still limited to a few centers of excellence and thus are not available to many practicing physicians. At the end, physicians will determine referral patterns for additional testing versus empirical treatment, on the basis of local availability ofrelevant resources.
Upper endoscopy is commonly used in clinical practice to evaluate patients with GERD who failed PPI treatment. This clinical strategy has been endorsed by the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE - 2007). Value of endoscopy in discovering GERD-related findings in patients with refractory GERD is very low because of predominance of NERD and functional heartburn patients among this group of patients & high efficacy of PPIs in healing erosive oesophagitis.
(GastrointestEndosc 2010;71:28-34.)Background: Failure of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment in patients with heartburn is very common.Because endoscopy is easily accessible, it is commonly used as the first evaluative tool in these patients.Objective: To compare GERD-related endoscopic and histologic findings in patients with heartburn in whomonce-daily PPI therapy failed versus those not receiving antireflux treatment.Design: Cross-sectional study.Setting: A Veterans Affairs hospital.Patients: Heartburn patients from the GI outpatient clinic.Intervention: Recording of endoscopic results.Main Outcome Measurements: Endoscopic findings and association between PPI treatment failure andesophageal mucosal injury by using logistic regression models.Results: A total of 105 subjects (mean age 54.7 Âą 15.7 years; 71 men, 34 women) were enrolled in the PPI treatment failure group and 91 (mean age 53.4 Âą 15.8 years; 68 men, 23 women) were enrolled in the no-treatment group (P=not significant). Anatomic findings during upper endoscopy were significantly more common in the no-treatment group compared with the PPI treatment failure group (55.2% vs 40.7%, respectively; P=.04). GERD-related findings were significantly more common in the no-treatment group compared with the PPI treatment failure group (erosive esophagitis: 30.8% vs 6.7%, respectively; P< .05). Eosinophilicesophagitis was found in only 0.9% of PPI treatment failure patients. PPI treatment failure was associated with a significantly decreased odds ratio of erosive esophagitis compared with no treatment, adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (adjusted odds ratio 0.11; 95%CI, 0.04-0.30).Conclusions: Heartburn patients in whom once-daily PPI treatment failed demonstrated a paucity of GERD related findings compared with those receiving no treatment. Eosinophilicesophagitis was uncommon in PPItherapy failure patients. Upper endoscopy seems to have a very low diagnostic yield in this patient population.
Surprisingly, more GERD patients who are refractory to PPI are referred today for antireflux surgery.the most common preoperative symptom under failure of medical anti-reflux treatment was regurgitation (54%).
The use of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures is becoming more frequent in clinical trials and health services research, both as primary and secondary outcomes. It is typically assessed by a self-completed questionnaire which asks a series of standardised questions about various aspects or facets of a personâs HRQoL. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) is the most commonly used HRQoL measure in the world today. It contains 36 questions measuring health across eight dimensions: physical functioning (PF); role limitation because of physical health (RP); social functioning (SF); vitality (VT); bodily pain (BP); mental health (MH); role limitation because of emotional problems (RE) and general health (GH). These eight dimensions are usually regarded as a continuous outcome and are scored on a 0â100 scale, where 100 indicates âgood healthâ.
In many cases, esophageal impedance is not available to the practicing physician, and empirical therapy is used.