SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 30
Download to read offline
Former NAS Moffett Field

Site 28 Supplemental Investigation
RAB Meeting
November 14, 2013

Valerie Harris, PE – Navy Remedial Project Manager
Neil Hey, PG - CB&I Federal Solutions
BRAC PMO West
Presentation Overview

 Site Background
 Project Objectives
 Technical Approach
 Building 88 Area - Preliminary Results
 Traffic Island Area – Preliminary
Results and Additional Planned Work
 Questions
2
3
Treatability Tests



Treatability tests were performed in three areas at Site
28 between July 2010 and June 2011



Analytical results from treatability study wells in the
Building 88 Area showed that the shallower
“upgradient” well had the highest concentrations of
chlorinated ethenes.



Analytical results from observation wells in the Traffic
Island Area showed that the deepest treatment area
well had the highest concentrations of chlorinated
ethenes.



These two areas were targeted for a supplemental
investigation after the treatability tests were complete
to better define the high concentration areas.
5
Project Objectives
Supplemental investigation is needed to:
1) Further delineate PCE & daughter products (TCE, DCE, & VC)
in A-aquifer within & around the Former Building 88 & Traffic
Island source areas
2) Confirm depth & lateral continuity of A/B-aquitard in Traffic
Island Area
3) Verify depth to top of B2-aquifer in Traffic Island Area
4) Confirm whether existing well W88-1, located in the Traffic
Island Area, is screened in the B2-aquifer
5) Confirm whether B-aquifer beneath Traffic Island Area is
impacted by chemicals of concern above ROD cleanup
standards and MCLs (EPA, 1989)
6
Technical Approach

Phase 1:
• SCAPS
 Semi-quantitative COC concentration data (mg/L
of calibration solution). Membrane interphase
probe (MIP) data are only considered estimates.
 Results by MIP system are relative & should be
verified by soil and groundwater.

Phase 2:
• Monitoring Well Installation/Soil
Sampling
• Groundwater Sampling
Building 88 Area Results

Membrane Interphase Probe (MIP)

8
Building 88 Investigation Activities

SCAPS Investigation – (Feb 2013 RAB)

•
•

24 SCAPS tests to 70 feet below ground surface

Soil Sampling and Grab Groundwater Sampling

•
•

9 discrete soil samples and 9 grab groundwater
samples

Monitoring Well Installation

•
•

6 groundwater monitoring wells

Soil Sampling

•
•

2 to 3 samples from each well borehole

Groundwater Sampling

•
•

2 rounds of samples collected
9
SCAPS PCE Results – Upper A-aquifer
Former Building 88 Area
mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter

28SI-05 (9 of DSITMS bgs)
– 19 ft calibration solution

General
Groundwater
Flow Direction

28SI-03 (10 – 20 ft bgs)
≥500 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
>100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
>1 mg/Lcs - DSITMS

28SI-02 (10 – 20 ft bgs)

Not Detected

28SI-01 (10 – 20 ft bgs)

Maximum MIP/DSITMS
Response

PCE
Upper A-aquifer
10

(6 to 35 ft bgs)
SCAPS PCE Results – Lower A-aquifer
Former Building 88 Area

General
28SI-04 (39 - 49 ft bgs)
Groundwater
Flow Direction

mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter
of DSITMS calibration solution

28SI-12 (46 - 51 ft bgs)

>100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
≥1 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
Not Detected

Maximum MIP/DSITMS
Response

PCE
Lower A-aquifer
11

(35 to ~67 ft bgs)
Groundwater Well Installation
Building 88 Area

6 monitoring wells were installed at the Building 88 Area
12
Groundwater – PCE Results
Building 88 Area
28SI-03 (10 – 20 ft bgs)
PCE =not detected

28SI-05 (9 – 19 ft bgs)
PCE = 150 mg/L

28SI-02 (10 – 20 ft bgs)
PCE = 35 mg/L
28SI-01 (10 – 20 ft bgs)
PCE = 14 mg/L

4 shallow wells – screened ~10 to 20 ft bgs
Concentrations not indicative of source area
13
Groundwater – PCE Results
Building 88 Area/Lower A
28SI-04 (39 - 49 ft bgs)
PCE = 820 mg/L

28SI-12 (46 - 51 ft bgs)
PCE = 2,900 mg/L

2 deeper wells – screened 39 to 49 ft bgs & 46 to 51 ft bgs
Concentrations higher than shallow wells but we have existing
14
down gradient wells for definition
Traffic Island Area Results

15
Investigation Activities
Traffic Island Area

SCAPS Investigation

•
•
•

28 SCAPS tests to 100 feet
2 SCAPS tests to 115 feet

Monitoring Well Installation

•
•

6 wells

Soil Sampling

•
•

2 to 3 samples from each well boring

Groundwater Sampling

•
•

new wells, two sampling events

16
SCAPS PCE Results – Upper A-aquifer
Traffic Island Area
mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter
of DSITMS calibration solution
>1,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
>100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
>5 mg/Lcs
28SI-08 (7 -17 ft bgs) - DSITMS
Not Detected

Maximum MIP/DSITMS
Response
General
Groundwater
Flow Direction

17

PCE
Upper A-aquifer
(6 to 35 ft bgs)
SCAPS PCE Results – Lower A-aquifer
Traffic Island Area
mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter
of DSITMS calibration solution
>10,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
>1,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
≥100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
≥3
28SI-011 (48 -58 ft bgs)mg/Lcs - DSITMS
Not Detected

Maximum MIP/DSITMS
Response
General
Groundwater
Flow Direction

18

PCE
Lower A-aquifer
(36 to ~78 ft bgs)
SCAPS PCE Results – B2-aquifer
Traffic Island Area
mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter
of DSITMS calibration solution
>10,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
>1,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
>100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
>8 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
Not Detected

28SI-10 (90 – 100 ft bgs)

28SI-06
(90 – 100 ft bgs)

28SI-09 (90 – 100 ft bgs)
Maximum MIP/DSITMS
Response
28SI-07 (105 – 115 ft bgs)
General
Groundwater
Flow Direction

19

PCE

B2-aquifer

(~78 to 100 ft bgs*)
* Two locations to 115 ft bgs
Groundwater Well Installation
Traffic Island Area

• Wells installed from July 10 to 24, 2013 at
locations based on results of the SCAPS
• Upper/Lower A-aquifer
– One shallow well (screened 7 to 17 ft bgs)
– One well screened 48 to 58 feet bgs

• B2-aquifer
– Three wells screened 90 to 100 feet bgs
– One well screened 105 to 115 ft bgs

20
Upper A-aquifer Groundwater Results

28SI-08 (7 -17 ft bgs)
PCE = 300 mg/L

Well installed to provide
information on the shallow
groundwater near Building 126

21
Lower A-aquifer Groundwater Results

28SI-011 (48 -58 ft bgs)
PCE = 5,300 mg/L

• Well installed to provide
information about groundwater
typical Sudan dye test
downgradient of high
concentration area
• EPA considers PCE >1,000 mg/L
to be a “source”
• Positive Sudan dye test was at
63 ft bgs in the Lower Aaquifer, but a well was not
screened at this depth
22

Soil from 63 feet bgs
at 28SI-06 had
positive Sudan dye
test
Additional Wells in Traffic Island

• 3 additional monitoring wells are planned for
Lower A-aquifer
– 2 collocated wells in down gradient direction
• Screen intervals of 32 to 42 feet bgs and 58 to 68
feet bgs
• Provide definition of source area
– 1 at location of observed DNAPL ganglia
• Screen interval from 60 to 65 feet bgs

• Installation planned for early December 2013

23
Proposed Additional Traffic Island Wells
mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter
of DSITMS calibration solution
>10,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
>1,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
28SI-14
(32 – 42 ft bgs)

≥100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS

28SI-15 (58 – 68 ft bgs)
28SI-011 (48 -58 ft bgs)

≥3 mg/Lcs - DSITMS
Not Detected

Proposed New Well
Newly Installed Well

28SI-13 (60 - 65 ft bgs)
General
Groundwater
Flow Direction

24

Lower A-aquifer
(36 to ~78 ft bgs)
A/B-aquitard
• SCAPS tests confirmed that predominately fine grained
sediments are present at all locations investigated
between ~ 75 and 78 ft bgs.
• These materials are considered to be the A/B-aquitard
• It varies in thickness in the Traffic Island Area from ~3
feet to >10 feet thick.
• However poorly graded sand with silt observed in well
boring 28SI-07 from 76 to 77.5 ft bgs; and clayey sand
in well boring 28SI-10 from 76 to 78 ft bgs
• Aquitard may not be laterally continuous

25
B2 Aquifer – Traffic Island
• Based on CPT data from 28 SCAPS tests, the B2 aquifer
begins about 78 feet bgs (proj obj #2)
• Existing deep well W88-1 is screened (72 to 82 ft bgs)
across the interval of the lower A-aquifer, A/B-aquitard
and top of the B2 aquifer (proj obj #4)
• Four new wells installed in the B2 aquifer in
predominately fine grained sediments (with thin silty
sand layers)
– Screened interval 90 to 100 ft bgs:
• 28SI-06; 28SI-09;28SI-10

– Screened interval 105 to 115 ft bgs:
• 28SI-07
B2 Aquifer – Traffic Island Area
28SI-10:
• Groundwater flow to the
PCE: 9.5 mg/L
north-northwest
• High concentration area
defined by SCAPS tests with
28SI-09:
W88-1:
PCE: 2.4 mg/L
ND response
PCE: 260 mg/L
• Low groundwater
28SI-06:
concentrations confirmed
PCE: 10,000 mg/L
near ND response
• B-aquifer is impacted by
COCs above cleanup
PCE Groundwater Results
standards (proj obj #5)
85 - 100 ft bgs
27
Results for Monitoring Well 28SI-07
Deepest well installed in
Traffic Island Area
PCE result from August:
9,500 mg/L
Total depth of SCAPS
investigation was
limited by approved
scope
MIP response at bottom
of hole was 400 mg/Lcalibration solution

28SI-07
PCE: 9,500 mg/L

Groundwater Results
100-115 ft bgs
28
Next Steps

• Install additional wells in Traffic Island Area
• Collect second round of groundwater samples
from the 12 newly installed monitoring wells
• Prepare Technical Memorandum
– Draft Technical Memorandum: May 2014

• Evaluate Path Forward for Treatment

29
Questions?

Point of Contact:
Scott Anderson
BRAC Environmental Coordinator
(619) 532-0938
scott.d.anderson@navy.mil

30

More Related Content

What's hot

21 herrick parameter selections sand2016 8665 c
21 herrick parameter selections sand2016 8665 c21 herrick parameter selections sand2016 8665 c
21 herrick parameter selections sand2016 8665 c
leann_mays
 
Analytical modelling of groundwater wells and well systems: how to get it r...
Analytical modelling of  groundwater wells and well systems:  how to get it r...Analytical modelling of  groundwater wells and well systems:  how to get it r...
Analytical modelling of groundwater wells and well systems: how to get it r...
Anton Nikulenkov
 
Using Fractals To Determine a Reservoir's Hydrocarbon Distribution
Using Fractals To Determine a  Reservoir's Hydrocarbon DistributionUsing Fractals To Determine a  Reservoir's Hydrocarbon Distribution
Using Fractals To Determine a Reservoir's Hydrocarbon Distribution
Society of Petroleum Engineers
 
27 kuhlman sand2016 8647 c hydrologic-modeling-v2
27 kuhlman sand2016 8647 c hydrologic-modeling-v227 kuhlman sand2016 8647 c hydrologic-modeling-v2
27 kuhlman sand2016 8647 c hydrologic-modeling-v2
leann_mays
 
Aquifer Characterization Using Multilevel Samplers in Rotasonic Boreholes
Aquifer Characterization Using Multilevel Samplers in Rotasonic BoreholesAquifer Characterization Using Multilevel Samplers in Rotasonic Boreholes
Aquifer Characterization Using Multilevel Samplers in Rotasonic Boreholes
Jeff Steiner
 
Does Heavy Oil Recovery Need Steam?
Does Heavy Oil Recovery Need Steam?Does Heavy Oil Recovery Need Steam?
Does Heavy Oil Recovery Need Steam?
Society of Petroleum Engineers
 
Robust Kick Detection: First Step on Our Well Control Automation Journey
Robust Kick Detection: First Step on Our Well Control Automation JourneyRobust Kick Detection: First Step on Our Well Control Automation Journey
Robust Kick Detection: First Step on Our Well Control Automation Journey
Society of Petroleum Engineers
 

What's hot (20)

29 reed synergies
29 reed synergies29 reed synergies
29 reed synergies
 
21 herrick parameter selections sand2016 8665 c
21 herrick parameter selections sand2016 8665 c21 herrick parameter selections sand2016 8665 c
21 herrick parameter selections sand2016 8665 c
 
Fluid Inclusion Application in Petroleum E&P
Fluid Inclusion Application in Petroleum E&P Fluid Inclusion Application in Petroleum E&P
Fluid Inclusion Application in Petroleum E&P
 
Key aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirs
Key aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirsKey aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirs
Key aspects of reservoir evaluation for deep water reservoirs
 
Analytical modelling of groundwater wells and well systems: how to get it r...
Analytical modelling of  groundwater wells and well systems:  how to get it r...Analytical modelling of  groundwater wells and well systems:  how to get it r...
Analytical modelling of groundwater wells and well systems: how to get it r...
 
Hapsite large plume slide
Hapsite large plume slide Hapsite large plume slide
Hapsite large plume slide
 
Water Quality Presentation
Water Quality PresentationWater Quality Presentation
Water Quality Presentation
 
Using Fractals To Determine a Reservoir's Hydrocarbon Distribution
Using Fractals To Determine a  Reservoir's Hydrocarbon DistributionUsing Fractals To Determine a  Reservoir's Hydrocarbon Distribution
Using Fractals To Determine a Reservoir's Hydrocarbon Distribution
 
27 kuhlman sand2016 8647 c hydrologic-modeling-v2
27 kuhlman sand2016 8647 c hydrologic-modeling-v227 kuhlman sand2016 8647 c hydrologic-modeling-v2
27 kuhlman sand2016 8647 c hydrologic-modeling-v2
 
Aquifer Characterization Using Multilevel Samplers in Rotasonic Boreholes
Aquifer Characterization Using Multilevel Samplers in Rotasonic BoreholesAquifer Characterization Using Multilevel Samplers in Rotasonic Boreholes
Aquifer Characterization Using Multilevel Samplers in Rotasonic Boreholes
 
Epa vi and source investigation rab mtg update august 7 2014rv1
Epa vi  and source investigation rab mtg update    august 7 2014rv1Epa vi  and source investigation rab mtg update    august 7 2014rv1
Epa vi and source investigation rab mtg update august 7 2014rv1
 
Paul Mitchell
Paul MitchellPaul Mitchell
Paul Mitchell
 
Does Heavy Oil Recovery Need Steam?
Does Heavy Oil Recovery Need Steam?Does Heavy Oil Recovery Need Steam?
Does Heavy Oil Recovery Need Steam?
 
Robust Kick Detection: First Step on Our Well Control Automation Journey
Robust Kick Detection: First Step on Our Well Control Automation JourneyRobust Kick Detection: First Step on Our Well Control Automation Journey
Robust Kick Detection: First Step on Our Well Control Automation Journey
 
Moffett RAB: EPA MEW Superfund Study Area Update
Moffett RAB: EPA MEW Superfund Study Area UpdateMoffett RAB: EPA MEW Superfund Study Area Update
Moffett RAB: EPA MEW Superfund Study Area Update
 
ICOS ATC Labeling Process
ICOS ATC Labeling ProcessICOS ATC Labeling Process
ICOS ATC Labeling Process
 
Monitoring playa water resources using gis and remote sensing
Monitoring playa water resources using gis and remote sensingMonitoring playa water resources using gis and remote sensing
Monitoring playa water resources using gis and remote sensing
 
20 EPA Review of DOE’s 2014 Compliance Recertification Application for WIPP
20 EPA Review of DOE’s 2014 Compliance Recertification Application for WIPP20 EPA Review of DOE’s 2014 Compliance Recertification Application for WIPP
20 EPA Review of DOE’s 2014 Compliance Recertification Application for WIPP
 
Robert Hawkes
Robert HawkesRobert Hawkes
Robert Hawkes
 
Chapter10
Chapter10Chapter10
Chapter10
 

Viewers also liked

Hangar One Update to Moffett RAB May 10, 2012
Hangar One Update to Moffett RAB May 10, 2012Hangar One Update to Moffett RAB May 10, 2012
Hangar One Update to Moffett RAB May 10, 2012
Steve Williams
 
Site Investigation and Example of Soil Sampling
Site Investigation and Example of Soil SamplingSite Investigation and Example of Soil Sampling
Site Investigation and Example of Soil Sampling
Joana Bain
 
Week 01 Preliminaries Works, Soil Investigate & Ground Water Control
Week 01 Preliminaries Works, Soil Investigate & Ground Water ControlWeek 01 Preliminaries Works, Soil Investigate & Ground Water Control
Week 01 Preliminaries Works, Soil Investigate & Ground Water Control
nik kin
 
Chapter 2 soil investigation
Chapter 2 soil investigationChapter 2 soil investigation
Chapter 2 soil investigation
AmiRul AFiq
 
site investigation
site investigationsite investigation
site investigation
olvive1208
 

Viewers also liked (16)

Hangar One Update to Moffett RAB May 10, 2012
Hangar One Update to Moffett RAB May 10, 2012Hangar One Update to Moffett RAB May 10, 2012
Hangar One Update to Moffett RAB May 10, 2012
 
OPHA Supplemental Site Investigation for Groundwater
OPHA Supplemental Site Investigation for GroundwaterOPHA Supplemental Site Investigation for Groundwater
OPHA Supplemental Site Investigation for Groundwater
 
Site investigation 2nd clayton etc
Site investigation 2nd clayton etcSite investigation 2nd clayton etc
Site investigation 2nd clayton etc
 
OBJECTIVES OF SITE INVESTIGATION BASED ON BS 5930 (1981)
OBJECTIVES OF SITE INVESTIGATION BASED ON BS 5930 (1981) OBJECTIVES OF SITE INVESTIGATION BASED ON BS 5930 (1981)
OBJECTIVES OF SITE INVESTIGATION BASED ON BS 5930 (1981)
 
Soil investigation by AURANGZEB
Soil investigation by AURANGZEBSoil investigation by AURANGZEB
Soil investigation by AURANGZEB
 
Soil investigation – some views
Soil investigation – some viewsSoil investigation – some views
Soil investigation – some views
 
Site Investigation and Example of Soil Sampling
Site Investigation and Example of Soil SamplingSite Investigation and Example of Soil Sampling
Site Investigation and Example of Soil Sampling
 
Bridge Lecture Slide by Micotol
Bridge Lecture Slide by MicotolBridge Lecture Slide by Micotol
Bridge Lecture Slide by Micotol
 
Week 01 Preliminaries Works, Soil Investigate & Ground Water Control
Week 01 Preliminaries Works, Soil Investigate & Ground Water ControlWeek 01 Preliminaries Works, Soil Investigate & Ground Water Control
Week 01 Preliminaries Works, Soil Investigate & Ground Water Control
 
Chapter 2 soil investigation
Chapter 2 soil investigationChapter 2 soil investigation
Chapter 2 soil investigation
 
Soil comp.ppt
Soil comp.pptSoil comp.ppt
Soil comp.ppt
 
lecture2 site investigation
lecture2   site investigationlecture2   site investigation
lecture2 site investigation
 
site investigation
site investigationsite investigation
site investigation
 
Geological Site Investigation Methods
Geological Site Investigation MethodsGeological Site Investigation Methods
Geological Site Investigation Methods
 
Soil exploration/Investigation method, purpose depth of exploration (Usefulse...
Soil exploration/Investigation method, purpose depth of exploration (Usefulse...Soil exploration/Investigation method, purpose depth of exploration (Usefulse...
Soil exploration/Investigation method, purpose depth of exploration (Usefulse...
 
Soil investigation
Soil investigationSoil investigation
Soil investigation
 

Similar to Site 28 Update, Moffett RAB, November 14, 2013

Greenstreet CW - Cooper Basin Unconventional Resources APPEA 2015
Greenstreet CW - Cooper Basin Unconventional Resources APPEA 2015Greenstreet CW - Cooper Basin Unconventional Resources APPEA 2015
Greenstreet CW - Cooper Basin Unconventional Resources APPEA 2015
Carl Greenstreet
 
ASR_Sharjah_20091214_Presentation
ASR_Sharjah_20091214_PresentationASR_Sharjah_20091214_Presentation
ASR_Sharjah_20091214_Presentation
Nathan Lopez
 
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13 r wright apec-gccsi engineering disclipines...
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13  r wright apec-gccsi  engineering disclipines...Apec workshop 2 presentation 13  r wright apec-gccsi  engineering disclipines...
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13 r wright apec-gccsi engineering disclipines...
Global CCS Institute
 

Similar to Site 28 Update, Moffett RAB, November 14, 2013 (20)

Monitoring measuring and verification, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of Alberta
Monitoring measuring and verification, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of AlbertaMonitoring measuring and verification, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of Alberta
Monitoring measuring and verification, Gonzalo Zambrano, University of Alberta
 
Site 28 In Situ Abiotic/Biotic Treatability Study Implementation
Site 28 In Situ Abiotic/Biotic Treatability Study ImplementationSite 28 In Situ Abiotic/Biotic Treatability Study Implementation
Site 28 In Situ Abiotic/Biotic Treatability Study Implementation
 
Measuring Success of Targeted BMP Implementation, and Getting Smarter about E...
Measuring Success of Targeted BMP Implementation, and Getting Smarter about E...Measuring Success of Targeted BMP Implementation, and Getting Smarter about E...
Measuring Success of Targeted BMP Implementation, and Getting Smarter about E...
 
Greenstreet CW - Cooper Basin Unconventional Resources APPEA 2015
Greenstreet CW - Cooper Basin Unconventional Resources APPEA 2015Greenstreet CW - Cooper Basin Unconventional Resources APPEA 2015
Greenstreet CW - Cooper Basin Unconventional Resources APPEA 2015
 
Utilizing Colloidal Liquid Activated Carbon to Control Back-Diffusive Mass Lo...
Utilizing Colloidal Liquid Activated Carbon to Control Back-Diffusive Mass Lo...Utilizing Colloidal Liquid Activated Carbon to Control Back-Diffusive Mass Lo...
Utilizing Colloidal Liquid Activated Carbon to Control Back-Diffusive Mass Lo...
 
Site 28 Supplemental Investigation
Site 28 Supplemental InvestigationSite 28 Supplemental Investigation
Site 28 Supplemental Investigation
 
September 1 - 0239 - Eileen Kladivko
September 1 - 0239 - Eileen KladivkoSeptember 1 - 0239 - Eileen Kladivko
September 1 - 0239 - Eileen Kladivko
 
A field study assessing the impact of on site valerie mc-carthy_slideshare
A field study assessing the impact of on site valerie mc-carthy_slideshareA field study assessing the impact of on site valerie mc-carthy_slideshare
A field study assessing the impact of on site valerie mc-carthy_slideshare
 
AICHE 15 VORTEX + MASS TRANSFER
AICHE 15   VORTEX + MASS TRANSFERAICHE 15   VORTEX + MASS TRANSFER
AICHE 15 VORTEX + MASS TRANSFER
 
Analysis of Stormwater System for Urban Development Project in North Louisiana
Analysis of Stormwater System for Urban Development Project in North LouisianaAnalysis of Stormwater System for Urban Development Project in North Louisiana
Analysis of Stormwater System for Urban Development Project in North Louisiana
 
Wp mp-update-camp pendleton.-april_25_2013
Wp   mp-update-camp pendleton.-april_25_2013Wp   mp-update-camp pendleton.-april_25_2013
Wp mp-update-camp pendleton.-april_25_2013
 
Groundwater and CO2CRC - insights from the Otway project and monitoring activ...
Groundwater and CO2CRC - insights from the Otway project and monitoring activ...Groundwater and CO2CRC - insights from the Otway project and monitoring activ...
Groundwater and CO2CRC - insights from the Otway project and monitoring activ...
 
Tabnak Drilling Management
Tabnak Drilling ManagementTabnak Drilling Management
Tabnak Drilling Management
 
Treatment of wastewater
Treatment of wastewaterTreatment of wastewater
Treatment of wastewater
 
A Methodology to Assess the Potential Impacts of Longwall Mining on Streams i...
A Methodology to Assess the Potential Impacts of Longwall Mining on Streams i...A Methodology to Assess the Potential Impacts of Longwall Mining on Streams i...
A Methodology to Assess the Potential Impacts of Longwall Mining on Streams i...
 
High Resolution Site Characterization (#HRSC) of Gasoline LNAPL Plume Migrati...
High Resolution Site Characterization (#HRSC) of Gasoline LNAPL Plume Migrati...High Resolution Site Characterization (#HRSC) of Gasoline LNAPL Plume Migrati...
High Resolution Site Characterization (#HRSC) of Gasoline LNAPL Plume Migrati...
 
LARGE SCALE INSTALLATION OF SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
LARGE SCALE INSTALLATION OF SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEM LARGE SCALE INSTALLATION OF SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
LARGE SCALE INSTALLATION OF SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
 
Ground water resource evaluation
Ground water resource evaluationGround water resource evaluation
Ground water resource evaluation
 
ASR_Sharjah_20091214_Presentation
ASR_Sharjah_20091214_PresentationASR_Sharjah_20091214_Presentation
ASR_Sharjah_20091214_Presentation
 
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13 r wright apec-gccsi engineering disclipines...
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13  r wright apec-gccsi  engineering disclipines...Apec workshop 2 presentation 13  r wright apec-gccsi  engineering disclipines...
Apec workshop 2 presentation 13 r wright apec-gccsi engineering disclipines...
 

More from Steve Williams

Site 25 rab nov 29 2012
Site 25 rab nov 29 2012Site 25 rab nov 29 2012
Site 25 rab nov 29 2012
Steve Williams
 
Hangar 1 rab update nov 29 2012
Hangar 1 rab update nov 29 2012Hangar 1 rab update nov 29 2012
Hangar 1 rab update nov 29 2012
Steve Williams
 

More from Steve Williams (20)

RAB NASA Update
RAB NASA UpdateRAB NASA Update
RAB NASA Update
 
RAB Vapor Intrusion Mitigation
RAB Vapor Intrusion MitigationRAB Vapor Intrusion Mitigation
RAB Vapor Intrusion Mitigation
 
RAB Vapor Intrusion Update, Installation Restoration (IR) Site 28
RAB Vapor Intrusion Update, Installation Restoration (IR) Site 28RAB Vapor Intrusion Update, Installation Restoration (IR) Site 28
RAB Vapor Intrusion Update, Installation Restoration (IR) Site 28
 
RAB Community Presentation
RAB Community PresentationRAB Community Presentation
RAB Community Presentation
 
Endophyte Assisted Phytoremediation of TCE and Derivatives Using Hybrid Popla...
Endophyte Assisted Phytoremediation of TCE and Derivatives Using Hybrid Popla...Endophyte Assisted Phytoremediation of TCE and Derivatives Using Hybrid Popla...
Endophyte Assisted Phytoremediation of TCE and Derivatives Using Hybrid Popla...
 
NASA Ames Update to Restoration Advisory Board
NASA Ames Update to Restoration Advisory BoardNASA Ames Update to Restoration Advisory Board
NASA Ames Update to Restoration Advisory Board
 
Moffett RAB: EPA Update on Environmental Issues Management Plan
Moffett RAB: EPA Update on Environmental Issues Management PlanMoffett RAB: EPA Update on Environmental Issues Management Plan
Moffett RAB: EPA Update on Environmental Issues Management Plan
 
NASA Update on Planetary Ventures Lease of Moffett Field
NASA Update on Planetary Ventures Lease of Moffett FieldNASA Update on Planetary Ventures Lease of Moffett Field
NASA Update on Planetary Ventures Lease of Moffett Field
 
Moffett Site 1, 22, 26, and 28 Five Year Review
Moffett Site 1, 22, 26, and 28 Five Year ReviewMoffett Site 1, 22, 26, and 28 Five Year Review
Moffett Site 1, 22, 26, and 28 Five Year Review
 
Moffett RAB: Navy EPA Intrusion Update
Moffett RAB: Navy EPA Intrusion UpdateMoffett RAB: Navy EPA Intrusion Update
Moffett RAB: Navy EPA Intrusion Update
 
Moffett RAB: Navy Vapor Intrusion Update
Moffett RAB: Navy Vapor Intrusion UpdateMoffett RAB: Navy Vapor Intrusion Update
Moffett RAB: Navy Vapor Intrusion Update
 
Moffett RAB: 2014 Planned Environmental Activities
Moffett RAB: 2014 Planned Environmental ActivitiesMoffett RAB: 2014 Planned Environmental Activities
Moffett RAB: 2014 Planned Environmental Activities
 
EPA MEW Sampling Update, Moffett RAB, November 14, 2013
EPA MEW Sampling Update, Moffett RAB, November 14, 2013EPA MEW Sampling Update, Moffett RAB, November 14, 2013
EPA MEW Sampling Update, Moffett RAB, November 14, 2013
 
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Air Sampling at the Former Orion ...
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Air Sampling at the Former Orion ...US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Air Sampling at the Former Orion ...
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Air Sampling at the Former Orion ...
 
Hazardous Substances at Moffett Field’s Hangar One: Challenges and Opportunities
Hazardous Substances at Moffett Field’s Hangar One: Challenges and OpportunitiesHazardous Substances at Moffett Field’s Hangar One: Challenges and Opportunities
Hazardous Substances at Moffett Field’s Hangar One: Challenges and Opportunities
 
Hangar One and Moffett Federal Airfield Leasing Opportunity Request for Propo...
Hangar One and Moffett Federal Airfield Leasing Opportunity Request for Propo...Hangar One and Moffett Federal Airfield Leasing Opportunity Request for Propo...
Hangar One and Moffett Federal Airfield Leasing Opportunity Request for Propo...
 
Moffett RAB: EPA Regional Groundwater and Vapor Intrusion Update
Moffett RAB: EPA Regional Groundwater and Vapor Intrusion UpdateMoffett RAB: EPA Regional Groundwater and Vapor Intrusion Update
Moffett RAB: EPA Regional Groundwater and Vapor Intrusion Update
 
Laser based Spectrometer for VOCs Monitoring
Laser based Spectrometer for VOCs MonitoringLaser based Spectrometer for VOCs Monitoring
Laser based Spectrometer for VOCs Monitoring
 
Site 25 rab nov 29 2012
Site 25 rab nov 29 2012Site 25 rab nov 29 2012
Site 25 rab nov 29 2012
 
Hangar 1 rab update nov 29 2012
Hangar 1 rab update nov 29 2012Hangar 1 rab update nov 29 2012
Hangar 1 rab update nov 29 2012
 

Recently uploaded

BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
SoniaTolstoy
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
kauryashika82
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
Q4-W6-Restating Informational Text Grade 3
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajansocial pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
 
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
BAG TECHNIQUE Bag technique-a tool making use of public health bag through wh...
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 

Site 28 Update, Moffett RAB, November 14, 2013

  • 1. Former NAS Moffett Field Site 28 Supplemental Investigation RAB Meeting November 14, 2013 Valerie Harris, PE – Navy Remedial Project Manager Neil Hey, PG - CB&I Federal Solutions BRAC PMO West
  • 2. Presentation Overview  Site Background  Project Objectives  Technical Approach  Building 88 Area - Preliminary Results  Traffic Island Area – Preliminary Results and Additional Planned Work  Questions 2
  • 3. 3
  • 4.
  • 5. Treatability Tests  Treatability tests were performed in three areas at Site 28 between July 2010 and June 2011  Analytical results from treatability study wells in the Building 88 Area showed that the shallower “upgradient” well had the highest concentrations of chlorinated ethenes.  Analytical results from observation wells in the Traffic Island Area showed that the deepest treatment area well had the highest concentrations of chlorinated ethenes.  These two areas were targeted for a supplemental investigation after the treatability tests were complete to better define the high concentration areas. 5
  • 6. Project Objectives Supplemental investigation is needed to: 1) Further delineate PCE & daughter products (TCE, DCE, & VC) in A-aquifer within & around the Former Building 88 & Traffic Island source areas 2) Confirm depth & lateral continuity of A/B-aquitard in Traffic Island Area 3) Verify depth to top of B2-aquifer in Traffic Island Area 4) Confirm whether existing well W88-1, located in the Traffic Island Area, is screened in the B2-aquifer 5) Confirm whether B-aquifer beneath Traffic Island Area is impacted by chemicals of concern above ROD cleanup standards and MCLs (EPA, 1989) 6
  • 7. Technical Approach Phase 1: • SCAPS  Semi-quantitative COC concentration data (mg/L of calibration solution). Membrane interphase probe (MIP) data are only considered estimates.  Results by MIP system are relative & should be verified by soil and groundwater. Phase 2: • Monitoring Well Installation/Soil Sampling • Groundwater Sampling
  • 8. Building 88 Area Results Membrane Interphase Probe (MIP) 8
  • 9. Building 88 Investigation Activities SCAPS Investigation – (Feb 2013 RAB) • • 24 SCAPS tests to 70 feet below ground surface Soil Sampling and Grab Groundwater Sampling • • 9 discrete soil samples and 9 grab groundwater samples Monitoring Well Installation • • 6 groundwater monitoring wells Soil Sampling • • 2 to 3 samples from each well borehole Groundwater Sampling • • 2 rounds of samples collected 9
  • 10. SCAPS PCE Results – Upper A-aquifer Former Building 88 Area mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter 28SI-05 (9 of DSITMS bgs) – 19 ft calibration solution General Groundwater Flow Direction 28SI-03 (10 – 20 ft bgs) ≥500 mg/Lcs - DSITMS >100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS >1 mg/Lcs - DSITMS 28SI-02 (10 – 20 ft bgs) Not Detected 28SI-01 (10 – 20 ft bgs) Maximum MIP/DSITMS Response PCE Upper A-aquifer 10 (6 to 35 ft bgs)
  • 11. SCAPS PCE Results – Lower A-aquifer Former Building 88 Area General 28SI-04 (39 - 49 ft bgs) Groundwater Flow Direction mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter of DSITMS calibration solution 28SI-12 (46 - 51 ft bgs) >100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS ≥1 mg/Lcs - DSITMS Not Detected Maximum MIP/DSITMS Response PCE Lower A-aquifer 11 (35 to ~67 ft bgs)
  • 12. Groundwater Well Installation Building 88 Area 6 monitoring wells were installed at the Building 88 Area 12
  • 13. Groundwater – PCE Results Building 88 Area 28SI-03 (10 – 20 ft bgs) PCE =not detected 28SI-05 (9 – 19 ft bgs) PCE = 150 mg/L 28SI-02 (10 – 20 ft bgs) PCE = 35 mg/L 28SI-01 (10 – 20 ft bgs) PCE = 14 mg/L 4 shallow wells – screened ~10 to 20 ft bgs Concentrations not indicative of source area 13
  • 14. Groundwater – PCE Results Building 88 Area/Lower A 28SI-04 (39 - 49 ft bgs) PCE = 820 mg/L 28SI-12 (46 - 51 ft bgs) PCE = 2,900 mg/L 2 deeper wells – screened 39 to 49 ft bgs & 46 to 51 ft bgs Concentrations higher than shallow wells but we have existing 14 down gradient wells for definition
  • 15. Traffic Island Area Results 15
  • 16. Investigation Activities Traffic Island Area SCAPS Investigation • • • 28 SCAPS tests to 100 feet 2 SCAPS tests to 115 feet Monitoring Well Installation • • 6 wells Soil Sampling • • 2 to 3 samples from each well boring Groundwater Sampling • • new wells, two sampling events 16
  • 17. SCAPS PCE Results – Upper A-aquifer Traffic Island Area mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter of DSITMS calibration solution >1,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS >100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS >5 mg/Lcs 28SI-08 (7 -17 ft bgs) - DSITMS Not Detected Maximum MIP/DSITMS Response General Groundwater Flow Direction 17 PCE Upper A-aquifer (6 to 35 ft bgs)
  • 18. SCAPS PCE Results – Lower A-aquifer Traffic Island Area mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter of DSITMS calibration solution >10,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS >1,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS ≥100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS ≥3 28SI-011 (48 -58 ft bgs)mg/Lcs - DSITMS Not Detected Maximum MIP/DSITMS Response General Groundwater Flow Direction 18 PCE Lower A-aquifer (36 to ~78 ft bgs)
  • 19. SCAPS PCE Results – B2-aquifer Traffic Island Area mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter of DSITMS calibration solution >10,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS >1,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS >100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS >8 mg/Lcs - DSITMS Not Detected 28SI-10 (90 – 100 ft bgs) 28SI-06 (90 – 100 ft bgs) 28SI-09 (90 – 100 ft bgs) Maximum MIP/DSITMS Response 28SI-07 (105 – 115 ft bgs) General Groundwater Flow Direction 19 PCE B2-aquifer (~78 to 100 ft bgs*) * Two locations to 115 ft bgs
  • 20. Groundwater Well Installation Traffic Island Area • Wells installed from July 10 to 24, 2013 at locations based on results of the SCAPS • Upper/Lower A-aquifer – One shallow well (screened 7 to 17 ft bgs) – One well screened 48 to 58 feet bgs • B2-aquifer – Three wells screened 90 to 100 feet bgs – One well screened 105 to 115 ft bgs 20
  • 21. Upper A-aquifer Groundwater Results 28SI-08 (7 -17 ft bgs) PCE = 300 mg/L Well installed to provide information on the shallow groundwater near Building 126 21
  • 22. Lower A-aquifer Groundwater Results 28SI-011 (48 -58 ft bgs) PCE = 5,300 mg/L • Well installed to provide information about groundwater typical Sudan dye test downgradient of high concentration area • EPA considers PCE >1,000 mg/L to be a “source” • Positive Sudan dye test was at 63 ft bgs in the Lower Aaquifer, but a well was not screened at this depth 22 Soil from 63 feet bgs at 28SI-06 had positive Sudan dye test
  • 23. Additional Wells in Traffic Island • 3 additional monitoring wells are planned for Lower A-aquifer – 2 collocated wells in down gradient direction • Screen intervals of 32 to 42 feet bgs and 58 to 68 feet bgs • Provide definition of source area – 1 at location of observed DNAPL ganglia • Screen interval from 60 to 65 feet bgs • Installation planned for early December 2013 23
  • 24. Proposed Additional Traffic Island Wells mg/Lcs denotes milligrams per liter of DSITMS calibration solution >10,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS >1,000 mg/Lcs - DSITMS 28SI-14 (32 – 42 ft bgs) ≥100 mg/Lcs - DSITMS 28SI-15 (58 – 68 ft bgs) 28SI-011 (48 -58 ft bgs) ≥3 mg/Lcs - DSITMS Not Detected Proposed New Well Newly Installed Well 28SI-13 (60 - 65 ft bgs) General Groundwater Flow Direction 24 Lower A-aquifer (36 to ~78 ft bgs)
  • 25. A/B-aquitard • SCAPS tests confirmed that predominately fine grained sediments are present at all locations investigated between ~ 75 and 78 ft bgs. • These materials are considered to be the A/B-aquitard • It varies in thickness in the Traffic Island Area from ~3 feet to >10 feet thick. • However poorly graded sand with silt observed in well boring 28SI-07 from 76 to 77.5 ft bgs; and clayey sand in well boring 28SI-10 from 76 to 78 ft bgs • Aquitard may not be laterally continuous 25
  • 26. B2 Aquifer – Traffic Island • Based on CPT data from 28 SCAPS tests, the B2 aquifer begins about 78 feet bgs (proj obj #2) • Existing deep well W88-1 is screened (72 to 82 ft bgs) across the interval of the lower A-aquifer, A/B-aquitard and top of the B2 aquifer (proj obj #4) • Four new wells installed in the B2 aquifer in predominately fine grained sediments (with thin silty sand layers) – Screened interval 90 to 100 ft bgs: • 28SI-06; 28SI-09;28SI-10 – Screened interval 105 to 115 ft bgs: • 28SI-07
  • 27. B2 Aquifer – Traffic Island Area 28SI-10: • Groundwater flow to the PCE: 9.5 mg/L north-northwest • High concentration area defined by SCAPS tests with 28SI-09: W88-1: PCE: 2.4 mg/L ND response PCE: 260 mg/L • Low groundwater 28SI-06: concentrations confirmed PCE: 10,000 mg/L near ND response • B-aquifer is impacted by COCs above cleanup PCE Groundwater Results standards (proj obj #5) 85 - 100 ft bgs 27
  • 28. Results for Monitoring Well 28SI-07 Deepest well installed in Traffic Island Area PCE result from August: 9,500 mg/L Total depth of SCAPS investigation was limited by approved scope MIP response at bottom of hole was 400 mg/Lcalibration solution 28SI-07 PCE: 9,500 mg/L Groundwater Results 100-115 ft bgs 28
  • 29. Next Steps • Install additional wells in Traffic Island Area • Collect second round of groundwater samples from the 12 newly installed monitoring wells • Prepare Technical Memorandum – Draft Technical Memorandum: May 2014 • Evaluate Path Forward for Treatment 29
  • 30. Questions? Point of Contact: Scott Anderson BRAC Environmental Coordinator (619) 532-0938 scott.d.anderson@navy.mil 30