SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 176
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
~0~
by Andrew McCaskill




        ~1~
Knowing the Unknown God
English (1st Printing) PDF (online version)


Creation Education Ministries of Thailand
1256/3 Sukhumvit 101/1 Rd.
Bangjak, Prakanong, BKK 10260
www.creationthai.org


© 2011 by Andrew McCaskill. All rights reserved. The author grants the free distribution of this
PDF online version by any means (photocopy, electronic, or otherwise) as long as the
distribution is always in whole (not in part) and that no alterations or manipulations are made to
the original manuscript. All quotations taken from this book should be cited under normal copy
rights guidelines.


Cover illustration by Raffaello Sanzio (1483–1520), St Paul Preaching in Athens (Royal
Collection of the United Kingdom) Public Domain Image: This is a faithful photographic
reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. Accessed from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:V%26A_-
_Raphael,_St_Paul_Preaching_in_Athens_(1515).jpg#file


Printed in Thailand


ISBN: Free Online Version


All scripture quotations, unless otherwise indicated, are
 taken from the Holy Bible, New International Version®,
 NIV®.
 Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984 by Biblica, Inc.™
 Used by permission of Zondervan. All rights reserved
 worldwide.
 www.zondervan.com



                                              ~2~
Dedication

 I dedicate this book to the students at International Community
School in Bangkok and to the many other students in high schools
  and universities throughout Thailand in which I have had the
privilege of presenting these topics in person. I also dedicate this
book to the many Thais who have helped me in translation efforts.
  Mostly, I dedicate this book to my wife and family who have
  shared with me the adventure of Knowing the Unknown God.




                               ~3~
We hope you will
               enjoy this FREE ebook,
             Knowing the Unknown God
               by Andrew McCaskill.


          It is our pleasure to share it with you.
  If you would like to purchase a souvenir copy of the
   paperback book or would like to send one as a gift,
please visit www.creationthai.org for more information.




                         ~4~
Table of Contents




Introduction……………………………………..7
Chapter 1 - The God of the Bible……………………12
Chapter 2 -The God of Logic………………………26
Chapter 3-The God of Creation……………………..52
Chapter 4 -The God of Man………………………89
Chapter 5 -The God of the Nations………………….103
Chapter 6 -The God of Salvation……………………128
Chapter 7 -Knowing the Unknown God……………...150



                           ~5~
~6~
Introduction

“TO AN UNKNOWN GOD” read the altar. Around two-thousand
years ago a man named Paul stared at an unusual idol in the city of
Athens. This idol was amidst other idols and was not terribly
different except for its strange inscription. Why was there an altar
to an unknown god? Athens was a very religious city in Paul‟s day.
The people of that city were held captive to the many gods they
feared. In fact, they were afraid that they had forgotten to worship
a certain god. Knowing that any god who was left out of their
worship would likely be jealous, mad, bitter, and vengeful, they
decided to make one altar “TO AN UNKNOWN GOD” in order to
appease any forgotten god.

You might, like the people of Athens, be unsure whether God (or
many gods) exists, and so, just like the Athenians, you attempt to
appease whatever god might exist.

Or, you might be very religious like the Athenians and worship
your god to the exclusion of all other gods.

Even so, some of you might insist that no god exists and therefore
you feel free to live like you are your own god.

To those who are confident that god (or multiple gods) does exist,
this book will challenge your concept of God and in the end you
will have a greater understanding of who God is and how you can
know Him to a greater degree.
                               ~7~
To those who are not sure if God exists or are convinced that there
is no God, this book will challenge your belief at its very core.
After reading this book, I believe that you will no longer be able to
claim the non-existence of God. I also believe that you will
conclude that any alternate view of reality (i.e. the Theory of
Evolution) is inadequate to account for the existence of the
universe and life.

It is the purpose of this book to present a compelling case for the
existence of God. I KNOW beyond any doubt that God exists and
I am confident that I know WHO God is. Just as Paul did in Athens
so many years ago, I will attempt to introduce you to the
“Unknown God” (and therefore make the “Unknown God” the
“Known God”).

I invite you to read the entirety of this book and consider every
point that is made. If you are a thinking person - one who seeks
wisdom - then this book is a must read. If you are curious and
scientifically minded, you will not be able to ignore the claims
made in this book. The Athenians questioned every new theory and
I invite you to also question my findings as well.

I have divided this book into seven chapters. These chapters are
briefly outlined below.

Chapter 1 will identify the “Unknown God”, “for surely there is
no sense in talking about the existence of God, without knowing
what kind of God it is who may or may not exist.”1

                                ~8~
Chapter 2 will present the God of Logic. Only with a concept of
God can anyone think logically. Those who claim that there is no
God are thinking illogically.

Chapter 3 will present the God of Creation. Only God as the
Grand Cause can explain the presence of our universe. A universe
without God is impossible.

Chapter 4 will present the God of Man. Humans are reflections of
God and we can know a lot about God from our own character.
Unfortunately, humans are also separated from God because of our
sin.

Chapter 5 will present the God of the Nations. God is the God of
every nation, people, and language.

Chapter 6 will present the God of Salvation. God‟s purpose has
always been to restore a lost relationship with humans. God has
provided a way to restore a relationship with Him and have
salvation.

Chapter 7 will present the “Unknown God” as the “Known God”.
God is not far from us and is evident to us in the most obvious
ways.

I encourage you to read this book in the order of the chapters. If
you begin at a later chapter, or if you skip from chapter to chapter,
you will miss key points that were made in earlier chapters.

Let‟s begin our journey to discover the “Unknown God”!
                                ~9~
Reference:

1
 Van Til, Cornelius. Christian Apologetics. Phillipsburg: P & R Publishing
Company, 2003.




                                      ~ 10 ~
“I am the Alpha and the Omega,”
 says the Lord God, “who is, and
 who was, and who is to come, the
    Almighty.” Revelation 1:8



               ~ 11 ~
Chapter 1



                      The God of the Bible



The Bible might be called “God's Book” because it makes some
incredible statements about who God is, what He is like, and how
we can relate to Him. The Bible also makes some incredible
statements about who we are as well. Anyone searching for truth
about their own existence, or about the purpose of life, should not
dare ignore the words contained within the pages of the Bible.
These words reveal to us the identity of God, who is beyond our
own comprehension (Isaiah 40:28).

Upon reading the Bible one quickly realizes that the words are
both biographical and autobiographical at the same time. That is,
the words of the Bible reveal God's own description of Himself,
channeled through people who were compelled to write about His
majesty, power, and love. Many people believe that the Bible is a
book of rules and regulations only, “but in fact the Bible is first of
all a book about God. It tells us all we need to know, and all we
                                ~ 12 ~
shall ever need to know, about God: who He is, what He is like,
what He does and, of course, how we can know Him.”1 We can
correctly summarize that the Bible is a unique presentation of
God's own story played out in the hearts and minds of humanity.

The Bible, however, is much more than a collection of wonderful
stories. Every story throughout the sixty-six individual books of
the Bible tells a larger story. The whole Bible paints a picture of a
loving Creator who is determined to win back the people He
created from the tragic error of their own rebellious decision. In
order to win them back He chooses to enter His own creation
(Jesus) and do for them what they could not do for themselves.
The Bible is above all a love story and we are the objects of God's
affection. So, in this sense, our biographies are written into the
Biblical story also.

The Bible is no fairy-tell with a fictitious plot, rather, the Bible
presents itself as absolute truth. In Psalm 119 alone, 171 of the 176
verses speak of the Bible and its power, might, and accuracy. Of
key interest in this discussion is verse 160 that says, All your words
are true; all your righteous laws are eternal. Several verses earlier
it states in similar fashion, Your righteousness is everlasting and
your law is true (142). Verse 151 of the same chapter repeats the
claim, Yet you are near, LORD, and all your commands are true.
We see three references here (words, law, commands) but each
signifies the same thing; the Bible (or Word of God) is true. Psalm
119 is a critical chapter because it validates itself as a source of
Truth. Some may call this circular reasoning but God must reveal
Himself to us or we would know nothing of His character. God,
therefore, chose to reveal His words as truth (autobiographical)
                                ~ 13 ~
through the written word of human authors (biographical). There is
no one higher or more powerful who can speak on God's behalf, so
He must reveal His own character to us. Couple the verses above
with Proverbs 30:5, which states, Every word of God is flawless;
he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his
words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar. In this verse we
are commanded to never alter the Bible. This must mean, of
course, that God's words are true and sacred, never to be changed
from their original meaning by either adding or subtracting from
them. They are flawless. When God speaks, His words are true
and without any error. Therefore, the internal evidence of the
Bible itself proves that the Bible is absolutely true in every way.
If, hypothetically, any words in the Bible were false, then,
according to this verse, God would be forced to rebuke Himself as
a liar. But this is impossible, which leaves us with only one
conclusion; God is Truth and His words are Truth.

If this were not enough, we also have the words of Jesus Himself.
In the book of John we are presented with a remarkable passage, In
the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the
Word was God (1:1). Here, Jesus is the very expression of God in
human form, the Word of God. Further in the book of John (14:6)
we read, I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to
the Father except through me. Jesus is here claiming that He is
absolute Truth and the only way to God. So, these two verses
confirm yet again that God's Word is accurate and one-hundred
percent true. The Bible is connecting the Truth (Jesus), the Word
(the Bible, expressed through Jesus), and God as one entity. The
Bible is therefore, God's Truthful Words expressed by and through
Jesus Christ. There are other internal evidences also. The Bible's
                              ~ 14 ~
unity2, fulfilled prophesies, and power to change individual lives
points to its Truth and accuracy.

As seen above, the internal evidence of the Bible is sufficient
enough to prove that the Bible is absolutely true, but there is also
external evidence that suggests the same. The Bible is historically
and archaeologically accurate. The Bible is also confirmed in its
human authors, who were even martyred for their conviction of its
truthfulness. The Bible speaks of changed lives, which can be just
as strong evidence as scores of other evidences. Lastly, the Bible's
endurance and indestructibility is also evidence for its truthfulness.
Many have tried to destroy the Bible and to free the world of its
teaching, but it has withstood every attack placed upon it, and in
the end, those who have tried to destroy it have only proven that it
is what they were hoping it was not; absolute Truth. Concerning
the Bible's indestructibility, Jesus states the matter this way,
Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass
away (Mark 13:31).

The Bible leaves no doubt that its author is God Himself. As we
have already read in Proverbs 30, Every word of God is flawless
(5-6). We also read in the book of 2 Timothy, All Scripture is
God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and
training in righteousness... (3:16). God is certainly the author of
the Bible even though it was written by human hands2.

Since the Bible presents itself as absolute Truth and the author of
those words is God Himself, then simple logic tells us that God
must be absolute Truth as well. This stems from the fact that if the
Bible communicates Truth, then the author of the Bible could be no
                                ~ 15 ~
less than its product. The scientific principle of causality (cause-
and-effect) proves this to be the case (see chapter 2, The God of
Logic). Any effect (the Bible in this case) is never greater than its
cause (God). God must be Truth if the Bible is Truth, since the
Bible is the product of God Himself. Therefore, the words of the
Bible are God's true words, both revealing who God is and who we
are. God doesn't lie, so His words can be trusted. In the book of
Samuel this simple logic is confirmed, He who is the Glory of
Israel does not lie or change his mind; for he is not a human being,
that he should change his mind (1 Samuel 15:29).

In the end, how can we know who God is? The Bible reveals Him
to us and we can trust that the Bible accurately speaks of His
character. Since the Bible is God's words about Himself, He would
never misrepresent Himself. We can know for certain who God is
and what He is like by reading the Bible. If you have ever
wondered if there is a God and what God is like, the answer is
found in the Bible alone, because He chose the Bible to be His
story.

The Characteristics below describe God's character.

  1.        God is the Creator of all material, biological, and spiritual things. In the
       beginning God created the heavens and the earth (Genesis
       1:1). There was nothing prior to God. God created matter,
       space, and time ex nihilo (out of nothing). God, however, is
       separate from His creation and is not contained within the
       dimensions of His own creation nor limited by them. (See
       chapter 3 for more explanation of God as the Creator.)
                                         ~ 16 ~
2.        God is Eternal. Before the mountains were born or you
     brought forth the whole world, from everlasting to everlasting
     you are God (Psalm 90:2). This means that God had no
     beginning, nor will he have an end. God has always been in
     existence and will forever be. No one created God. He is an
     eternal being, separate from time itself, which He created. God
     will never cease to exist, nor be annihilated, nor is He
     contained within a cycle of events.

3.       God is Unchanging. God is not human, that he should lie, not
     a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak
     and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill? (Numbers
     23:19) God is not like man. He does not lie, nor does He
     change his mind. God does not become other forms3 or
     change in nature. Man cannot become God. Of Jesus it is said,
     He is the same today, yesterday, and forever (Hebrews 13:8).

4.       God is Incomparable. How great you are, Sovereign LORD!
     There is no one like you, and there is no God but you, as we
     have heard with our own ears (2 Samuel 7:22); Among the
     gods there is none like you, Lord; no deeds can compare with
     yours (Psalm 86:8). There is but one God. No other god
     (man-made or imagined) is equal to the God of the Bible. The
     God of the Bible is the only true God.

5.       God is Indescribable. Do you not know? Have you not heard?
     The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of
     the earth. He will not grow tired or weary, and his
                                ~ 17 ~
understanding no one can fathom (Isaiah 40:28). We will
     never be able to fully understand God. He is beyond our own
     comprehension. This does not mean that He is unknowable.
     We can know God's character by reading the Bible.

6.       God is Fair. As for God, his way is perfect: The LORD‟s
     word is flawless; he shields all who take refuge in him (Psalm
     18:30). God is a just ruler. He treats everyone fairly.
     Unfortunately, we are all sinners and have rejected God
     (Romans 3:23) and so our rejection of Him justifies our
     condemnation. Amazingly, God provides us grace through
     Jesus Christ, which we do not deserve. (See God is Gracious
     below.)

7.       God is All-Powerful (Omnipotent). Ah, Sovereign LORD, you
     have made the heavens and the earth by your great power and
     outstretched arm. Nothing is too hard for you (Jeremiah
     32:17). There is absolutely nothing that God cannot do. No
     other spiritual force can alter God's plan. All material,
     biological, and spiritual entities are under His control. God's
     power is always used in a way that is consistent with His
     character.

8.        God is everywhere (Omnipresent). Where can I go from your
     Spirit? Where can I flee from your presence? If I go up to the
     heavens, you are there; if I make my bed in the depths, you are
     there. If I rise on the wings of the dawn, if I settle on the far
     side of the sea, even there your hand will guide me, your right
     hand will hold me fast. If I say, “Surely the darkness will hide
                                ~ 18 ~
me and the light become night around me,” even the darkness
     will not be dark to you; the night will shine like the day, for
     darkness is as light to you. For you created my inmost being;
     you knit me together in my mother‟s womb (Psalm 139: 7-13).
     You cannot hide from God. He is everywhere at once. God is
     not limited by time, physical location, or material body. You
     cannot keep God in a box, in a house, or in a temple. God is
     Spirit and is free to come and go as He chooses. However,
     this does not mean that God is in everything or occupies
     everything. Nor does it mean that everything is God. The
     God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of
     heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by human
     hands. And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed
     anything. Rather, he himself gives everyone life and breath
     and everything else. From one man he made all the nations,
     that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out
     their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their
     lands. God did this so that they would seek him and perhaps
     reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from any
     one of us (Acts 17:24-27).

9.        God is All-Knowing (Omniscient). You have searched me,
     LORD, and you know me. You know when I sit and when I
     rise; you perceive my thoughts from afar. You discern my
     going out and my lying down; you are familiar with all my
     ways. Before a word is on my tongue you, LORD, know it
     completely. You hem me in behind and before, and you lay
     your hand upon me (Psalm 139: 1-5). Only God knows
     everything. He knows the past, the present, and the future.
                               ~ 19 ~
Because God is All-Knowing, He is completely fair (as we
  have already discussed).


10. God is Righteous. But now apart from the law the
  righteousness of God has been made known, to which the Law
  and the Prophets testify. This righteousness is given through
  faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference
  between Jew and Gentile, for all have sinned and fall short of
  the glory of God, and all are justified freely by his grace
  through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. God
  presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, through the
  shedding of his blood—to be received by faith. He did this to
  demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance he
  had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished— he did it
  to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time, so as to
  be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus
  (Romans 3:21-26). Righteousness in simple terms means that
  God always does what is right and true according to His own
  nature. For example, it was right to punish humanity for
  sinning against Himself since our sin is a rejection of God's
  righteousness. If God ignored sin and didn't punish those who
  sin, He would no longer be righteous.

11. God is Sovereign. The LORD reigns, he is robed in majesty;
  the LORD is robed in majesty and armed with strength;
  indeed, the world is established, firm and secure (Psalm 93:1).
  God has complete reign and rule. No power (of man or of
  spiritual beings) is higher than God's power. His decisions
                             ~ 20 ~
and actions cannot be altered nor changed by man. Yours,
  LORD, is the greatness and the power and the glory and the
  majesty and the splendor, for everything in heaven and earth is
  yours. Yours, LORD, is the kingdom; you are exalted as head
  over all (1 Chronicles 29:11).

12. God is Spirit. God is spirit, and his worshipers must
  worship in the Spirit and in truth (John 4:24). God is
  invisible. He cannot completely be understood or perceived by
  man. This is why God must reveal Himself through the Bible
  (Truth). Otherwise, we would never be able to know God at
  all. The Spirit is one member of the Trinity.3

13. God is Truth. He who is the Glory of Israel does not lie or
  change his mind; for he is not a human being, that he should
  change his mind (1 Samuel 15:29). As has previously been
  determined, God is Truth. He cannot lie, ever! His Son, Jesus
  Christ, is the only way to know God and receive Salvation.
  This is because Jesus ...is the Way, the Truth, and the Life
  (John 14:6).

14. God is Holy. Holy, holy, holy is the LORD Almighty; the
  whole earth is full of his glory (Isaiah 6:3); Your eyes are too
  pure to look on evil; you cannot tolerate wrongdoing....
  (Habakkuk 1:13). God is separated from humanity. He is
  different. God cannot tolerate sin and evil because it is
  contrary to His holiness and righteousness. God's holiness and
  our sinfulness have created a chasm between God and man,
  but God's graciousness through Jesus has united God and man
                             ~ 21 ~
once again.

  15. God is Gracious. And he passed in front of Moses,
    proclaiming, “The LORD, the LORD, the compassionate and
    gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and
    faithfulness (Exodus 34:6). God gives us grace, which is
    undeserved favor. We deserve death because of our sinfulness,
    but God gives us life through Jesus Christ alone.

  16. God is Love .God is love... (1 John 4:16); neither height nor
    depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to
    separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our
    Lord (Romans 8:39); But because of his great love for us,
    God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even
    when we were dead in transgressions—it is by grace you have
    been saved (Ephesians 2:4-5). God loves each one of us. His
    greatest love act was to send His Son, Christ Jesus, to save us
    from our sinful rebellion. God's love through Jesus is a gift
    that is given to all, but each individual must receive it through
    personal acknowledgement of Jesus Christ as Lord of their
    lives. God is love and He is grace, but He is also fair, which
    means that those who reject God's love and grace will be
    eternally separated from Him (Hell) after they die.


Although, we will never completely understand God (remember
He is indescribable) we gain a greater understanding of who He is
by reading the Bible. God will continually reveal Himself to
anyone who seeks to know Him with a pure heart. We are
                               ~ 22 ~
promised this in the book of Jeremiah; You will seek me and find
me when you seek me with all your heart (Jeremiah 29:13). “As
we read through Scripture and see God's character, we begin to
understand His absolute authority and the authority of His Word...
He is the starting point of biblical authority because He is the only
limitless One and the only One who has always been, with full
control of past, present, and future.”4


References and Notes:

1 Edwards, Brian H. Nothing But The Truth. Webster: Evangelical Press, 2007.

2 “One of the first internal evidences that the Bible is truly God‟s Word is seen in its
unity. Even though it is really sixty-six individual books, written on three
continents, in three different languages, over a period of approximately 1500 years,
by more than 40 authors who came from many walks of life, the Bible remains one
unified book from beginning to end without contradiction. This unity is unique from
all other books and is evidence of the divine origin of the words which God moved
men to record.”

(Got Answers Ministries. “Attributes of God.” February, 6th 2011:
http://www.gotquestions.org/attributes-God.html)

3 “The most difficult thing about the Christian concept of the Trinity is that there is
no way to perfectly and completely understand it. The Trinity is a concept that is
impossible for any human being to fully understand, let alone explain. God is
infinitely greater than we are; therefore, we should not expect to be able to fully
understand Him. The Bible teaches that the Father is God, that Jesus is God, and
that the Holy Spirit is God. The Bible also teaches that there is only one God.
Though we can understand some facts about the relationship of the different
Persons of the Trinity to one another, ultimately, it is incomprehensible to the
human mind. However, this does not mean the Trinity is not true or that it is not
based on the teachings of the Bible.....The Trinity is one God existing in three
                                        ~ 23 ~
Persons. Understand that this is not in any way suggesting three Gods.” (Got
Answers Ministries. “What does the Bible teach about the Trinity.” February, 20th
2011:http://www.gotquestions.org/Trinity-Bible.html)

4 Ham, Steve. “It All Starts With God's Character.” Answers Magazine Jan.-Mar.
2011 pg. 81.




                                      ~ 24 ~
It is undeniable that there is neither truth, meaning, nor
   purpose without an intelligent Creator who, for His own
reasons, made the universe and each of us in His Image. Yet
  the world of academia largely rejects this inescapable fact.
 Professors and students claim to be on a quest for truth while
 denying that it exists or that anyone could identify it if it did.
 Such is the nihilistic atmosphere in major universities around
 the world. It is considered to be too dogmatic for anyone to
  claim that truth can be known. Then what is the point of
research and study, if all we can achieve is a listing of differing
 opinions, none of which can be declared to be either right or
                             wrong.”
               Dave Hunt, Seeking & Finding God, pp.47-48. .




                                  ~ 25 ~
Chapter 2



                        The God of Logic



Is Logic Absolute?

Do you believe in logic? You might think this is a strange question
to ask in a book about the identity of God, but I believe that this is
an important place to begin our attempt to know who God is and
what He is like. We have already identified many attributes of
God's character in the first chapter. There is, however, another
characteristic of God identified in the Bible that has not been
mentioned yet. God is the God of logic. In simple terms, this
means that God is the mind behind all things and that He created
these things to function in predictable ways that can be understood
by man.

If logic is from God it must reflect the character and mind of God.
God is infinite and omniscient, so therefore, we would expect logic
to be absolute; the same for any human, anywhere, and at any time.
Otherwise, logic would change as the wind blows or as the tides
                                ~ 26 ~
fluctuate, and we would never have the ability to trust our own
knowledge. If this were the case, what was true one moment might
not be true the next moment. But since God's character is
consistent and unchanging, so are the fixed laws that are
expressions of His mind. His laws are absolute and therefore, logic
is possible. This is why we can understand the world around us.
Later in this chapter we will discuss some of these absolute laws
(Law of Non-Contradiction and the Law of Causality) that are
expressions of God's character.

Do you believe that this world operates by fixed laws? Scientific
investigations and mathematical processes require fixed laws that
are predictable and can be applied anywhere in the world, with
identical results. In fact, every day we use simple logic to answer
basic questions such as, “Why did this happen?” or “What caused
this?” The truth is, we all believe in, and know intuitively, that
logic exists, whether we want to admit it or not. The use of logic is
the most fundamental and basic level of human knowledge.

Notice again that the opening question is phrased do you believe in
logic?, not, do you think logic exists? There is a critical difference
between believing and thinking. Thinking is a mechanical process
(electrical impulses bouncing around the neurons of the brain)
which requires logical deductions to determine its own validity.
There would be little true thought (arguably none) without the laws
of logic firmly in place. Therefore, thought is dependent upon
logic. Anyone trying to prove that logic exists quickly realizes that
logic is automatically proven the moment the attempt is made to
prove its validity. So, in the end, we believe in logic because
thought is impossible without it. This may seem to be circular
                                ~ 27 ~
reasoning (which in itself is only understood in the light of logic)
but logic turns out to be its own best witness.

Logic Needs a Belief System

In order to be logical at all, one must have a framework of belief.
Logic is a matter of belief not just methodological thought
processes. Let us return to the questions posed in the third
paragraph, “Why did this happen?” and “What caused this?” It is
impossible to answer these questions without belief in established
laws. For example, when I ask the question, Why did this
happen?, I automatically use laws of causality to trace the effect
back to an original cause. I believe that all effects are a result of a
cause and that I can come to a true understanding of what that
cause might be. Most causes can neither be seen nor observed,
and therefore, cannot be scientifically verified, but we believe in
them anyway, and thus, we believe in the very laws of logic
themselves.

Worldviews and Presuppositions

In the day to day affairs of life we use logic to determine whether
something is true or false, valid or invalid, right or wrong, and we
can do this effectively because of our personal beliefs which make
logic possible. In order to help us interpret events, all of us have
accepted a framework of belief, and this is what allows our logic to
make sense of unknowable events. Because our knowledge is
limited we must have a starting point (framework of belief) that all
information is interpreted upon.
                                 ~ 28 ~
Figure 2:1 Each of us knows a very small portion of the total available
  knowledge that could be known. Only God is All-Knowing. Therefore, in our
  attempt to make sense of unknown information we must begin with a bias or
      presupposition. (See Figure 2:1 in the notes and references section.)




This framework of belief is often called a worldview. A worldview
can be described as a belief that governs the way we interpret
evidence and which also allows us to make sense of the world
around us. Worldviews are composed of individual presuppositions
or personal biases. These presuppositions are established early in
our lives and are often difficult to change. Our presuppositions
determine the way we interpret evidence, not the reverse.
Evidence never speaks for itself, it is neutral, and we must interpret
it according to a framework of belief.1



                                    ~ 29 ~
Figure 2:2 Notice that both an evolutionist and a Creationist have the same
evidence and use the same laws of logic, the difference is their starting points
(presuppositions) and their ending points (interpretations). Our biases, along
     with the laws of logic, allow us to interpret data and make sense of it.
Although the laws of logic are the same for everyone, personal biases are not.
This is why two people can look at the same evidence and come to two entirely
  different interpretations of the evidence. None of us are neutral and we use
 our biases as a framework of interpretation for all unknown information. So,
 not only must we believe that logic exists; we must also believe that our own
  biases are true. However, if personal biases are incorrect then the resulting
 interpretations will be incorrect. Therefore, it is important to have a correct
                  bias in order to have a correct interpretation.


                                  ~ 30 ~
Figure 2:3 For any one piece of evidence many different interpretations exist,
  therefore, we filter other people's interpretations before we accept them. Notice
 that if the interpretation agrees with our worldview, it is accepted, however, if the
  interpretation disagrees with our worldview it is rejected. This is the manner in
       which each of us filters interpretations before we accept or deny them.



What Mean Ye These Stones (Fossils)?

Let's consider some evidence to show how presuppositions govern
the way evidence is interpreted. At many locations around the
world we find “fossil graveyards”. These are areas with hundreds
or even thousands of individual organisms that have all been
fossilized together in one location. Often these fossils represent
                                       ~ 31 ~
organisms that did not live together in the same ecological
location. Because an evolutionist's presupposition denies the
existence of God and the truthfulness of the Bible, he must account
for these unusual fossil formations by natural processes alone.
Therefore, the typical story of fossil formation according to an
evolutionist begins with an organism's death. The organism is then
covered by water-laden sediment and through a slow process and
the right amount of pressure; the cells of the organism are replaced
by sediment and become rock. This rock is a cast of the original
organism with the same physical features as the once living
organism. Evolutionists would consider fossilization a unique
event, which is rarely observed, if ever, in the present. “Fossil
graveyards” then, pose a significant challenge to the evolutionary
explanation as evolutionists are hard-pressed to account for a
method that would fossilize thousands of organisms in the same
physical location under normal conditions. There are no known
“natural” conditions today that are fossilizing thousands of
organisms at once, especially organisms from different ecological
zones. Since these conditions are not observed today, evolutionists
are forced to explain “fossil graveyards” as a long duration
(millions of years) event. The problem with a “millions of years”
explanation is that the bones of many of these fossilized organisms
are interlocked together. Bones cannot become interlocked
together if the organisms from which they came died millions of
years apart. Secondly, as has been stated above, many of these
fossils are from organisms that do not normally live together in the
same ecological zone. This suggests that these organisms did not
die in the same location but died in other ecological zones and
were transported (most likely by moving water) to the location
where they were buried and fossilized.
                               ~ 32 ~
When it comes to “fossil graveyards”, evolutionists face an
explanatory problem because their own theory of slow fossil
formation over millions of years isn't adequate to explain the
thousands of fossils buried together. There must be a better
explanation. There is!

The Bible speaks of a global flood (Genesis 8-10) that covered the
entire earth with water. This global flood killed most organisms on
the planet at that time. The organisms that died in the flood would
have been carried great distances by the water and covered rapidly
by the advancing waters and swirling oceans. This global flood
explains perfectly how organisms from different ecological zones
were carried to the same location and buried together. The flood
also explains how the quantities (thousands) of organisms were
buried together. Lastly, the flood provides the most ideal water-
laden sediment and pressure that were required for the organisms
to be fossilized. The Biblical flood sufficiently answers all of the
questions regarding the formation of fossil graveyards but an
evolutionary worldview is insufficient to do the same.

So, why doesn't an evolutionist accept the Biblical explanation? It
certainly seems far superior to their own explanation.
Evolutionists reject this explanation, not because it is invalid, less
superior, or less scientific to their own, but because it comes from
the Bible. Therefore, they do not reject the explanation, but the
Bible. Evolutionists might even agree that the Biblical explanation
is a better explanation, but they will not accept it simply because it
is from the Bible. Evolutionists are letting their own
presuppositions (that there is no God and the Bible is not true)
                                ~ 33 ~
force them to accept an explanation that is less than sufficient. It is
most tragic that an evolutionist, who supposedly prides himself on
being scientific, will reject the most scientific explanation simply
because it supports an alternate viewpoint than his own. The often
quoted evolutionary scientist Richard Lewontin exemplifies this
tragic viewpoint when he said, “We take the side of science in spite
of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its
failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life,
in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for
unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior
commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the
methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a
material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary,
that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to
create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that
produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no
matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that
materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in
the door.” 2

Logic and Contradiction

The law of non-contradiction states that contradictory statements
cannot both be true at the same time. For example, if it is said that
A is greater than B and that A is not greater than B, then one
statement is false because both statements cannot possibly be true
at the same time. The law of non-contradiction is a law that is
impossible to deny. The very moment one declares that the law of
non-contradiction is untrue, it is proven. Denying the law sets up
                                ~ 34 ~
two contradictory statements from which one is expected to be
true, and so, its denial verifies its validity. An identical situation
exists when some religions claim that two contradictory statements
can both be true at the same time, thus attempting to deny the law
of non-contradiction to avoid apparent contradictions in their own
religion. In communicating this, however, they must set their
statement (that contradictory statements can both be true) against
the law of non-contradiction itself, which forces a contradiction
between the two. In the end, instead of disproving the law of non-
contradiction, they verify it. The denial of an absolute reality and
the denial of an absolute truth are also common claims among
certain religions, but, once again the absolute belief that no
absolute reality or absolute truth exists places the two beliefs in
contradiction with the former (that they do exist), and thus, the law
of non-contradiction is proven yet again.3This is why the Law of
Contradiction is truly a universal law? Two contradictory
statements cannot both be true because God never contradicts
Himself. God is absolute Truth and He never lies. God created the
universe to reflect His character so that we may know Him and
develop knowledge through understanding His creation. Science is
possible because God is Truth and His creation reflects His
character. If there was no God, we would have no possible way to
understand the physical world around us.

 In the example of “fossil graveyards” described above, the law of
non-contradiction proves that one of these interpretations is
incorrect. Either fossil graveyards were produced by slow
evolutionary processes or by quick catastrophic methods (Biblical
Flood Model). There is no such thing as a slow catastrophic
process. Since these views are competing and contradictory they
                                ~ 35 ~
cannot possibly be both true at the same time. Because
interpretations of past events often contradict each other, a choice
is made to believe an interpretation that is in support of the
individual's personal worldview (review figure 2:3). Someone
who rejects theories based on their own worldview, rather than
scientific experimentation, is engaging in religion, not science.
There are many extremely religious evolutionary scientists who do
not follow the science, but only accept explanations that support
their own philosophical worldview. To be fair, Biblical creationists
have their own philosophical worldview to uphold, but this is the
main point of the argument; both evolutionists and Biblical
creationists are religiously motivated, and thus, defend a religious
viewpoint. “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in
the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.” 4

Science and Causality

The Law of Cause-and-Effect (Causality) is the most established
law in science. One cannot even conduct science without
acknowledgement of this law5. The Law itself states that there is a
relationship between two events; the second (the effect) is
dependent upon the first (the cause). A further extension of this law
states that the cause must always exceed (be larger in extent) than
its effect.
 Figure 2:4 Notice that each effect is dependent upon the preceding cause and that
  each effect is quantitatively and qualitatively smaller than the preceding cause.




                                      ~ 36 ~
Again, using the “fossil graveyard” scenario as an example, we can
determine that there must have been an extremely great cause (very
large in extent) that brought about the effect of thousands of fossils
being buried together. Therefore, this law seems to rule out a
slow-and-steady, one-fossil-at-a-time event, as evolution suggests,
because the effect is far too great for such an individually small
cause. The Biblical explanation of a global flood, however, would
have been a sufficiently large cause to produce the effect of a
“fossil graveyard”.

We can also extend the Law of Causality to life itself and all other
realms of science. In fact, the causal relationship is the backbone
of all scientific pursuits. Since living organisms are composed of
complex components with inter-related parts, the cause must have
                                ~ 37 ~
been more complex (intelligent) than the effect. This might be
called the teleological argument. Other cause-and-effect arguments
are outlined below.

Extension of the Law   Argument
of Cause-and-Effect6
                       ...uses order and design in nature to prove the existence
                       of a Designer. Therefore, if the cell looks designed, then
     Teleology...      there must be a designer that created the cell.
                       …focuses on the motion of the cosmos as evidence of a
                       prime mover. Therefore, if the cosmos has motion, then
     Cosmology...      there must have been a Creator that set it in motion.


                       ...is the study of existence. Therefore, if the concept of
      Ontology...      God exists, then God must really exist.

                       ...is the study of beauty. Therefore, if something can be
                       considered beautiful or expressive in quality, then there
     Aesthetics...     must be an ultimate expression of beauty.


                       ...is the study of desire and will. Therefore, if individual
                       humans have a will, then there must be an ultimate will.
      Volition...
                       ...is the study of a “right” and a “wrong”. Therefore,
                       since all people know intuitively that there is “good”
      Morality...      and “bad”, “right and wrong”, then there must be an
                       absolute standard of morality.



Although the cause-and-effect deductions above are not absolute
proof of God's existence, they certainly lead to a strong concluding
argument for the existence of a “Grand Cause”. This possibility
                                    ~ 38 ~
increases further when one considers that evolution runs in direct
opposition to causality. For example, if evolution were true, then
all complex organisms on this planet evolved from an infinite
number of less complex organisms in the past. Evolution must
move in the wrong direction.

Evolutionists are forced to admit that many of the processes that
must have occurred, in order for evolution to be true, are counter to
the basic laws that run the universe. The laws of logic are not
friendly toward evolution either. “The faith of the evolutionist and
humanist is of another order altogether. His is a splendid faith
indeed, a faith not dependent on anything so mundane as evidence
or logic, but rather a faith strong in childlike trust, relying wholly
on omniscient Chance and omnipotent Matter to produce the
complex systems and mighty energies of the universe. The
evolutionist's faith is not dependent on evidence, but is pure faith –
absolute credulity.”7 However, the Law of Cause-and-Effect taken
to the furthest degree argues perfectly for the existence of God,
since a Grand Cause is a necessary conclusion.

  Figure 2:5 Notice that complexity is maintained or lost (because of mutational
  events) but not gained. This supports the conclusion that all causes are greater
   (or at least equal to) their effects. However, in each case, evolution must defy
   the law of causality and build complex structures from more simple structures.
   This is the reverse of the cause-and-effect relationship and is not scientifically
                                         possible.




                                       ~ 39 ~
~ 40 ~
Because evolutionists claim to function only in the realm of our
physical senses, it is often claimed that God does not exist (or at
least is undetectable) since He is not seen, felt, or tasted. This
claim makes two fatal errors. The first error demands that God
must present Himself in visible form before we can accept His
existence. The person who claims this has the audacity to tell God
that He must play by their rules. We have no right to limit God to
his own creative products. The second error assumes that we
cannot see God, but God's effects are “clearly seen” (Romans 1),
and so, we can detect God's existence by our physical senses when
we see His effects. Therefore, to argue against the existence of God
because He is unseen is to argue against all unseen causes.
Intuitively, we know that even if the cause is unseen, it still exists.
It is no different with the existence of God. The effects of God are
enough to conclude His existence.

The Effects of God

Since the world is a collection of individual effects, each effect
must have been produced by a greater cause than itself. Obviously,
these individual effects could not have extended indefinitely in the
past or their present effects would be too small to detect and no
longer even measurable. Likewise, the causes that produced the
effects could neither extend indefinitely in the past or they would
become too large to be measured. The infinite existence of the
cause-and-effect relationship cannot be defended scientifically.
Once again, the most logical conclusion is that there must have
been an initial cause, or First Cause, to the effects that we observe
today.
                                ~ 41 ~
Furthermore, we can conclude from the cause-and-effect
relationship that “the First Cause....
….of limitless space must be infinite in extent.
….of endless time must be eternal in duration.
….of perpetual motion must be omnipotent in power.
….of unbounded variety must be omnipresent in phenomena.
….of infinite complexity must be omnipotent in intelligence.
….of consciousness must be personal.
….of feeling must be emotional.
….of will must be volitional.
….of ethical values must be moral.
….of religious values must be spiritual.
….of beauty must be aesthetic.
….of righteousness must be holy.
….of justice must be just.
….of love must be loving.
….of life must be living.”8

If the list of “must be” requirements above sounds familiar; they
are! Added together, these “must be” requirements for the “First
Cause” perfectly describe the God of the Bible as was discussed in
the first chapter. Could evolution produce complex thought and
feelings such as love, joy, pain, and jealousy? “It makes no sense
that unfeeling, unthinking, dead matter could produce feeling,
thinking, living beings, and yet that is what people are expected to
believe”9 from the theory of evolution. Indeed, there is no possible
way that personality could come from an impersonal universe.


                               ~ 42 ~
Creation Is the Only Logical Belief System

Since logic is a non-material (or non-physical) thing, it must exist
outside of our own brains. Furthermore, since all humans
recognize and use the same logical rules, it is neither a product of
the individual mind. An evolutionist must account naturally for a
non-material law that governs the way the material (and all of
science for that matter) works. This of course means that laws must
have come before the material and biological world; since they are
both regulated and upheld by these laws. Laws cannot evolve.
Since logic exists outside of the material and because it is
universally applied, it must be an expression of a greater mind than
our own. God is that greater mind! Logic exists because God
exists. Without God, there is no logic and there is no science. God
created the laws that allow us to be logical. Because the laws that
allow us to be logical are not physical things, we must believe in
them. Therefore the laws of logic are presuppositions that we hold
to be true. Every scientist (and all people) believes these laws are
true (holds to this presupposition), otherwise they would not be
able conduct science at all. Whether you believe in God or not,
every day you confirm God's existence by using logical reasoning
skills. Therefore, an evolutionist proves the existence of God
daily, even while trying to deny Him. Jason Lisle, in his book The
Ultimate Proof of Creation, summarizes it this way, “If evolution
were true, science and reasoning would not be possible; there
would be no basis for logic, nor would there be any basis for
uniformity in nature. So if evolutionists were consistent with their
worldview, they would not be able to reason or do science. Yet
evolutionists are able to reason and to do science. Thus it follows
                                      ~ 43 ~
that evolutionists do not consistently rely upon their own
worldview. They rely upon creationist presuppositions.”10

We are all biased!

Logic is the most basic level of true knowledge that God gave each
of us at birth. We intuitively use logic daily, but as we have
determined already, a belief system is needed in order to use logic
effectively. As a Christian, I believe that God is who He said He
is. I believe the Bible is true and accurate in its history. I believe
the Bible describes the character of God perfectly; without any
error. I also believe that the Bible, although not a science
textbook, is completely accurate when it speaks about scientific
matters. This is my presupposition, and everything written in this
book is written with this presupposition in mind. Therefore, this
book is completely biased and I admit this with all honesty and
without any hesitation. Of course, anyone reading this book also
has personal biases. Your bias might agree with my bias, or it may
not. None of us are neutral on any topic. It is important that we are
honest and open about our biases. It may be that our biases are
incorrect and that a different bias provides a better interpretation
and explanation. I have evaluated my bias many times and in the
end I agree with Cornelius Van Til when he expressed his
sentiment this way, “Now, in fact, I feel that the whole of history
and civilization would be unintelligible to me if it were not for my
belief in God. So true is this, that I propose to argue that unless
God is back of everything, you cannot find meaning in anything.”11



                                ~ 44 ~
Ask yourself these questions as they relate to the origin of life and
answer them honestly.

(1) What are your biases about the origin of life?

(2) Are your biases sufficient to explain the space-mass-time
cosmos of this universe?

(3) If your bias is not sufficient to explain the space-mass-time
cosmos, are you willing to accept another bias that is more
sufficient?


These are great questions for anyone to ask themselves. I can
honestly say that I believe that my bias (the God of the Bible is the
Creator) is the only legitimate bias to have. I know that this
statement might challenge and offend those who have a different
bias, but is it not true that someone's bias must be the correct bias.
Therefore, each of us should be asking ourselves how we can know
which bias is the correct bias to have.

The reason that I can be so bold about my bias is not because I feel
superior about myself but because I feel my God is superior. I
believe that all other biases are not capable of logical
interpretation. The biblical presupposition allows me to have
reason to trust my own logical conclusions. This is because my
logic has a true foundational basis in the God who created the laws
that govern logic. My logic is in perfect agreement with God's
laws. An atheistic evolutionist believes neither God nor the Bible
are true, and because of this, has no explanation for the existence
                                ~ 45 ~
of logic. Remember, logic cannot evolve. Why would an
evolutionist trust his own evolved brain to come to a logical
conclusion about anything? When an evolutionist says that the
world evolved, why should he even trust his own thoughts? There
is no logical way for an evolutionist to defend his own belief. An
evolutionist must borrow from the biblical framework of belief
(that there are absolutes) in order to use logic affectively. This is
why evolutionists can never truly be logical. We, as humans, can
only be logical because God is the God of logic and He created us
in His image.12 Denying the God of logic makes one completely
illogical. This is why I can be so bold in my statement.


Suppressing the Truth

In the book of Romans we find a perfect portrayal of this entire
chapter. Romans 1 (verses18-20) states, The wrath of God is being
revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness
of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what
may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made
it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God‟s invisible
qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly
seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people
are without excuse.
This passage makes it absolutely clear that everyone knows that
God exists because God is plain to them. You might question what
is so plain to everyone. The next verse explains what is plain to
everyone; God‟s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine
nature—have been clearly seen. How can you see invisible
                               ~ 46 ~
qualities? God's invisible qualities are the very laws that govern
the way that all living things work and function. So, you can see
the invisible qualities of God when you see the effects of the laws
that God created. It is God's eternal power and divine nature that
keeps everything functioning as it does. Nothing in this universe,
galaxy, planet, body, cell, molecule, or even atom, would function
without God's laws in place. He upholds everything by His power.
God's eternal power is so forcefully evident that all people are
without excuse. This means that God has given us enough evidence
of His own existence from His creation alone. God created us with
brains that could perceive Him through his laws, that govern both
the created world and thought itself, and He expects us to come to
this logical conclusion; that He exists. Those who state that there is
no God are doing so out of their own presupposition, not because
of lack of evidence. The next verse (21) states this clearly, For
although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor
gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their
foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise,
they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God
for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and
animals and reptiles. Everyone knows God exists, some however,
choose to deny His existence anyway! “Men cannot long be
satisfied with chaos, however. Each person is so conditioned by all
his observations and experiences to think in terms of causation and
purpose that he must, even despite himself, look for some kind of
ultimate order and meaning in the universe. If he has lost faith in
the true God, and His Word, then he must sooner or later find
another god.”13 An atheist, by denying God's existence, has
convinced himself there is no God, but in actuality he has deified
himself as god, and thus has exchanged the glory of the immortal
                                ~ 47 ~
God for images made to look like a mortal human being. As the
verse states, their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts
were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became
fools... The Bible explains that those who do not believe in God
are fools because they exchange God's logic for foolish arguments
(evolution), all the while trying to deny the existence of God by
using the very logic that God created them to use to know Him.
This is the pinnacle of foolish thinking.

The progression of foolishness from Romans 1 is outlined
below.

God is known by all→He is           denied because of      personal
presuppositions→Ability to make     logical sense of the   world is
lost→ Becomes a fool→Heart         is darkened→God's       glory is
exchanged and given to a false      god or self→God's      wrath is
released on foolish man.

The progression of wisdom is outlined below.

God is known by all→He is accepted as the only God→Has the
ability to make logical sense of the world→Becomes wise→Gives
glory only to God→God's approval and happiness is felt and
known completely.

Which progression above would you place yourself in?

If you acknowledge God as Creator, you are seeking true wisdom;
however, if you deny God as Creator your thinking is based on

                              ~ 48 ~
foolishness. If the latter is the case, it is not too late to accept Jesus
and seek God's wisdom.

Conclusion

At the conclusion of this chapter there are three important points to
re-state.

    (1) The battle between evolution and creation is really a battle
between religious beliefs and worldviews, not scientific evidences.

     (2) “True reason and true science will lead to God, but man
does not want to submit to God and, therefore, denies the evidence
of his own reason.”14

     (3) Logic only has a basis in the Biblical Worldview.

It is a peculiar thing that some people, who neither believe in God,
nor creation, still claim that logic could exist. The fact of the
matter is that logic has no basis outside of a Creator God. In the
next chapter we will learn more about the Creator of all things.

Notes and references:
1
 Although evidence is neutral, we are never neutral. All of us have presuppositions
that determine the way we interpret evidence. Jesus Himself confirms this when he
said, Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me
scatters. (Luke 11:23) Personal neutrality is an impossible position.



                                      ~ 49 ~
2
  Richard Lewontin, “Billions and billions of Demons,” The New York Review,
January 9, 1997, p. 31.
3
  It should also be noted that anyone who believes that absolute truth and absolute
reality do not exist is inconsistent in their belief. For example, anyone who tries to
deny the absolute reality of gravity will meet the absolute truth of death when they
jump from a 20 story building. Everyone must live and behave daily in ways that
assume the existence of both absolute truth and absolute reality, and therefore, those
who deny it are living in direct contradiction to their denial of it.
4
 Michael Ruse,”Saving Darwinism from the Darwinians,” National Post, May 13,
2000, B-3.
5
  Using the scientific method, scientists set up experiments to determine causality in
the physical world. Imbedded within the scientific method and experiments is a
hypothesis or several hypotheses about causal relationships. The scientific method
is used to test these hypotheses.
6
    This chart has been compiled from information appearing in Morris(3), pg. 109.
7
    Morris (5), pg. 22.
8
    Morris (3), pg. 112.
9
    Morris (3), pg. 123.
10
     Lisle, Jason. The Ultimate Proof of Creation, Green Forest: Master Books, 2009.
11
 Van Til, Cornelius. Christian Apologetics, Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing
Company, 2003.
12
   Genesis 1:26; The “image of God” is not a physical image, as if we look like
God‟s physical body. Rather, the “image of God” represents a “mental, moral, and
social likeness“. (see Made in the image of God by Russell M. Grigg,
http://creation.com/made-in-the-image-of-god. Creation Ministries International.)
13
     Morris (3), pg. 124.
14
     Morris (3), pg. 124.

Figure 2:1 – Illustration recreated from... Chittick, Donald E. Ph.D. The Puzzle of
Ancient Man. Newberg: Creation Compass, 2006.

                                        ~ 50 ~
Do you not know?

         Have you not heard?

  The LORD is the everlasting God,
   the Creator of the ends of the earth.
    He will not grow tired or weary,
and his understanding no one can fathom.
             Isaiah 40:28




                ~ 51 ~
Chapter 3



                             The God of Creation




The Necessity of a Creator

Logic has proven the necessity of a Creator! The theory of
evolution has no logical basis to defend itself, therefore,
evolutionists are forced to adopt one of two positions; (1) admit
their own worldview cannot possibly make sense of the universe
and adopt the Christian worldview which can make sense of the
universe, or (2) admit their own worldview is illogical and cease
from using logical thought processes to explain their theory.
Evolutionists, of course, will not easily adopt either position for
obvious reasons. Evolutionists have placed themselves then in an
impossible position from which there is no escape; either use God's
laws of logic to deny God's existence (which actually proves His
existence) or deny their own rational minds and abandon logic
altogether (which would prove evolution a baseless opinion in a
sea of nothingness). God makes it plain that those who deny His
                                    ~ 52 ~
existence are fools; The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”
(Psalm 14:1) Denying God makes evolutionists (and evolutionary
based religions)1 hopelessly illogical and completely dependent
upon the Christian worldview to make sense of the world.

The universe demands a Creator and our reasoning is dependent
upon His existence. The cosmos and its space-mass-time tri-unity
was not always in existence, as some evolutionists and most other
religions suspect2, but had to be created by an ultimate Grand
Cause, which, as we discussed in the last chapter, can be none
other than the God of the Bible. Who else has the ability and power
to bring everything into existence but the God of the Bible? In fact,
the space-mass-time continuum is mentioned in the very first verse
of the Bible (Genesis 1:1); In the beginning (time)...God (the
Grand Cause)...created (brought about for the first time)...the
heavens (space)...and the earth (matter or mass). Evolution is
completely dependent upon the pre-existence of the cosmos which
must have been in place before evolution could function. Only the
Bible explains the origin of the cosmos adequately. So, yet once
more, evolution (and other religions) must acknowledge the Truth
of the Bible in order to make sense of their own beliefs. There is
no escaping this simple conclusion. (This would be a good time to
review the characteristics of God discussed in the first chapter.)
  Figure 3:1 The Cosmos (Space-Mass-Time) must have been created at the same
    time. We observe that energy acts on matter as it occupies space over a given
  time. The functioning of the universe is set precisely on the interactions of these
  three components. Evolution must assume that the cosmos spontaneously began
   or that space, mass, and time evolved independently from each other. Since the
   cosmos is non-living, evolutionary mechanisms cannot be used in its formation.
      Evolution cannot explain the existence of the Space-Mass-Time continuum.

                                      ~ 53 ~
Ex Nihilo

It is clear from the text above (Genesis 1:1) that God created the
cosmos. The biblical verb used in this verse (Bara; ‫ )בָּרא‬means to
                                                          ָּ
create out of nothing (Latin ex nihilo) or to bring about something
that is completely new in quality. We, of course, have never
created anything new that hasn't already existed previously. We
can only form or manufacture something from pre-existing
materials, but these materials were ultimately created by God. In
the Bible, the verb used “to form” (yatsar; ‫ יָּצַר‬and sometimes asah;
‫ )עשָּה‬is a different verb than is the verb used “to create” (Bara),
    ָּ
although they are sometimes used of God interchangeably. The
clear teaching of Genesis 1:1 is that God did not form the cosmos
from materials that were already in existence but He created
everything ex nihilo.3
                                ~ 54 ~
Obviously, mere processes have no abilities to create either.
Processes can only shape and reform, but not create. Take for
example the process of natural selection. Natural selection can
only preserve traits (characteristics) that are beneficial to the
organism, but it can never create new traits. As has been noted
many times, natural selection might be able to explain the
“survival of the fittest” but not the “arrival of the fittest”. Actually,
natural selection is a process that supports the biblical conservation
of “Kinds” better than evolution's use of natural selection to
produce new and novel types of organisms. God evidentially
instituted natural selection as a conservation process to maintain
and sustain his created order. (See the section Thermodynamics
and Evolution and Biblical Kinds in this chapter.)

Creation Is No Longer Happening

The first verse of the Bible also proves that the creation was
completed in the past and is not a continuous event. In the
beginning God created... and therefore, is not still creating. This
“creating process” ended at the end of the creation week (See the
section Formative Works of God in this chapter.) when God
pronounced, Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all
their vast array. By the seventh day God had finished the work he
had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work.
Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it
he rested from all the work of creating that he had done (Genesis
2:1). The combination of completed-finished-rested could signal
no other logical conclusion than, creation is no longer happening.
                                  ~ 55 ~
This fact rules out any possible merger of the creation event
described in the Bible and the theory of evolution4. Evolution
suggests a continual progression of small incremental creations,
whereas, the Bible presents the creation event as already
completed, therefore, the law of non-contradiction proves the
impossibility that both of these conflicting views are correct.
Although the “creating” came to a conclusion after the sixth day,
God put into place two sustaining laws that would govern His
creation. These sustaining laws are the laws of 1st and 2nd
thermodynamics. (See the section Thermodynamics and Evolution
in this chapter.)

God Created Instantly

Two verses later (Genesis 1:3) we notice another remarkable fact;
God created instantaneously. And God said, “Let there be light,”
and there was light. God simply spoke light into existence. The
power of His Word brought about everything. So, once again,
evolution is denied explicitly in these verses. Because the creation
was completed instantaneously in the past, evolution's slow-and-
steady change could not possibly be a mechanism that God used to
bring about the cosmos. God does not contradict Himself.

God Is Not The Cosmos

It should also be noted that the subject of this first verse is God (In
the beginning God) and that He created the heavens and the earth.
This eliminates the possibility that God was a part of the cosmos
itself. God did not create Himself or bring about an essence of
                                ~ 56 ~
Himself. He created something entirely new; something that never
existed before and something that was separate in quality from
Himself. In short, God is not the cosmos and the cosmos is not
God, nor did the cosmos pre-exist God but it was God who pre-
existed the cosmos.

As you see, the first verse of the Bible is the most conclusive and
precise statement that has ever been uttered. In this one verse we
can conclude the following:

      God is the Grand Cause.
      God is not the same as the cosmos (space-mass-time) or
       contained within it.
      God pre-existed before the cosmos.
      God is the only one who can “create” anything and He did
       so ex nihilo.
      God's creation was completed in the past.
      God created instantaneously by His powerful Word.


Creation Has Documented History

Because God is the Creator and speaks nothing but Truth, we can
trust what He says about His own creation. After all, He was the
only eye-witness to the creation event and so, historically, we have
all the reason to believe in God's own description as first hand
evidence. It must be pointed out that the theory of evolution is not
able to provide such a witness. Its history is not from an eye-
witness account like the biblical explanation, but pieced together
                                  ~ 57 ~
using hypothetical words such as “what if”, “perhaps”, and
“maybe”. These are hardly scientific words and they leave no
confidence in the end of the matter. The Bible, on the other hand is
definite. There is no hesitation in describing the precise order and
manner in which God created the world. The Bible does not leave
us with cloudy, half-descriptive words like evolution does; on the
contrary, we are presented with a confident self-assertion of God as
the Grand Cause and designer of all things. The first three
chapters of the Bible are a play-by-play of God's actions to create
the material, biological and spiritual dimensions of our world and
although they do not describe every single detail of the creation,
they do present a more than satisfying account for the existence of
the universe. G.K. Chesterton could not have said it better when
he remarked, “The riddles of God proved more satisfying than the
answers proposed without God.”5

The Bible never tries to prove that God is the Creator, rather it is
assumed from the beginning. Since God is the author of the Bible
this makes perfect sense. God does not need to provide an
apologetic of His own existence, rather, the creation itself provides
a more than adequate witness to His own power, order, and
wisdom. Those who do not accept God's silent witness of Himself
(General Revelation) will never accept His verbal witness of
Himself (Special Revelation).

The General Revelation

God's creation might be called a “general revelation” because
everyone has received the same evidence. We all wake to the same
                               ~ 58 ~
sun and conclude our day with the same moon. We all observe the
change of seasons, the cycles in nature, the complexities of life,
and perceive the world from our special senses. God makes it
clear that the creation alone is enough evidence to know He exists.
As was discussed in chapter 2, Romans 1:20 declares, For since
the creation of the world God‟s invisible qualities—his eternal
power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being
understood from what has been made, so that people are without
excuse. Psalm 19 (verses 1-4) portrays this sentiment perfectly as
well, The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the
work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night
after night they reveal knowledge. They have no speech, they use
no words; no sound is heard from them. Yet their voice goes out
into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world. No one on
this planet can say, “God has not given me enough evidence to
believe that He exists.” Clearly, His universe is shouting to all who
will listen that He is the mind behind the matter.

From the creation alone we can determine a few attributes of God‟s
character. We can determine that God is orderly and uniform and
very creative. The question that all of us face is, from where did
the order and uniformity of the physical universe come from? An
illogical position would be to accept that a random, purposeless,
and unguided process like evolution could account for the order
and design of the universe. To not believe in a Creator is to deny
cause-and-effect relationships and reality itself.       Evolutionists
must deny this obvious reality each day as they are forced to
fabricate fantastic stories to account for the order and uniformity of
the universe through natural processes alone. Evolutionists,
however, know in their hearts that God is real and this is
                                ~ 59 ~
represented by their incessant deification and personification of
evolution in order to attribute the order and design of the universe
to something greater than themselves. The next time you read an
article written from an evolutionary perspective look for
descriptions like assembled themselves, constructed, built,
manufactured, emerged, arose, burst onto the scene, modified
itself, was lucky, and created. These descriptive terms are used to
explain how sheer molecules can manipulate natural processes to
become more complex in structure and function. Not only is this
contrary to established laws of science (See Thermodynamics and
Evolution in this chapter.), but it is dishonest. These are subtle
attempts to circumvent God by giving evolution abilities that only
God can possess. It is at moments like this that evolutionists reveal
their own inner battle with the evidence. They must either deny the
apparent design of nature or attribute it to evolution in God-like
fashion. It is impossible to deny the apparent design of the
universe; therefore, evolutionists attribute the evidence of design to
evolution (their god) or try in vain to deny the undeniable; as
leading Darwinist Richard Dawkins does in his book Climbing
Mount Improbable when he states that evolution “...has only the
appearance of being intelligently designed.”6 Or in similar scope,
as Francis Crick puts it “Biologists must constantly keep in mind
what they see was not designed, but evolved.”7 Obviously (though
these statements are supposedly in favor of evolutionary theory)
statement such as these provide first-hand evidence of the crisis
that evolutionists face. These sorts of comments reek of montra-
like pronouncements hoping in vain to wish-away the obvious fact
that things exhibit order and uniformity, which are features of
design and henceforth, demand a Designer.

                                ~ 60 ~
In the end, an evolutionist's own words prove that he knows and
perceives the God of the Bible through His creation but, as
Romans 1:20 declares, he is …suppressing the Truth. “God has so
made man that he intuitively recognizes God's existence, at least
until his training or religious traditions have educated it out of
him.”8

In summary, there are two obvious qualities of the general
revelation that are understood by all; (1) its apparent order and (2)
uniformity in design. It is from these two that the first steps toward
knowing and understanding God must be met. Evolution cannot
explain the existence of either. “It is no accident that at every level
of the cosmos–sub-atomic, atomic, organic, inorganic, sub-human,
human, earth, moon, sun, stars, galaxies–all things manifest
amazing order and rationality that can be reasonably explained
only as the result of a deliberate, creative act of God.” 9

The Special Revelation

In the Christian worldview, general revelation is enough to
condemn, but not enough to save. In other words, to admit that
there is a Creator does not mean that one has been pardoned from
their sin nor does it mean that they have received God's Salvation.
The Bible declares ...You believe that there is one God. Good!
Even the demons believe that—and shudder (James 2:19).
Obviously, demons have not been pardoned from their sin, nor
received God's Salvation. It takes more than a concept of a Creator
to receive Salvation.

                                ~ 61 ~
Since, the general revelation is only enough to prove God's
existence, He provided a greater revelation that speaks of His
character and divine nature. This greater revelation is often called
the “special revelation” and is none other than the Bible. “In the
Bible, the reader meets God's most direct form of special
revelation: the person of Jesus Christ.” 10 God then, wants ...all
people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. For
there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the
man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all people (1
Timothy 2:4-6).

Unfortunately, evolution has deceived many into believing that
there is no God, and therefore, the special revelation is ignored
because the general revelation is denied. If the general revelation
is denied then the hope of salvation is lost, because it is in the
special revelation that Jesus Christ is revealed. (See Chapter 6, The
God of Salvation).

The Triumph of God's Special Revelation

“It is better theology and philosophy to begin with the God of the
Bible to explain the universe than to begin with the universe to
explain God.”11 This is true because the general revelation can be
misinterpreted. As we discussed in the last chapter, man's
presuppositions may lead him to an interpretation of the evidence
that denies God's existence. This is why an evolutionist can look
at evidence that clearly supports a Creator and yet, deny that He
exists. Secondly, as will be discussed in the next chapter (The God
of Man), the entire creation is subject to decay. This is a result of
                                    ~ 62 ~
the “Fall of Man” which not only affected man's relationship with
God but also introduced pain, suffering, and decay into the
physical world. Anyone who denies the special revelation will
miss these explanations and thus, will likely misinterpret the
evidence. Only with the Bible as the primary interpretation tool
can we successfully comprehend the world around us. In a sense,
our minds are corrupted and need to be purified. Only the Bible
can purify them. Evolutionists begin with the wrong
presupposition (no God), restrict themselves to the general
revelation only, and use their corrupted minds to interpret
evidence. No wonder their conclusion is incorrect. (You might
want to review the Progression of Foolishness at the end of
Chapter 2.)

Not only can man never arrive at a correct interpretation of the
physical world without the Bible, he can never answer the “big”
questions without it either. The general revelation might help us
answer the “temporal” questions of life; it does little to help us
answer the “eternal” questions of life. For instance, only God's
special revelation can answer the following questions.

   Why are we here?
   Does God Exist?
   Why do men have physical emotions like sadness, happiness,
    and joy?
   How can I be saved?
   How can I know God?
   Why do I feel guilty when I do bad things?

                              ~ 63 ~
It will do little good in the end of it all if you can recite the steps a
mitochondria takes to convert sugar to energy, however, if you
know the living Savior Jesus Christ, your soul will be saved for
eternity.

The general revelation is to be acknowledged, and even studied,
but if it remains the only source of knowledge for an individual; it
and the person's soul will be lost for eternity. The Bible makes it
clear that the special revelation triumphs the general revelation.
Two verses in the Bible that specifically pinpoints the relationship
between God's general and special revelations are Isaiah 40:8 and
John 1:1-4. The passage in Isaiah reads, The grass withers and the
flowers fall, but the word of our God endures forever. The grass
(general revelation) is temporal, but the Word of God (special
revelation) is eternal. Only investments in God's economy (Bible)
will pay dividends. This world will pass away but as Jesus says,
my words will never pass away (Matthew 13:31). God's Word is
eternal because the Word (Jesus) is God, and of course, God is
eternal. The passage in John mentioned above explains the
relationship thus, In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the
beginning. Through him all things were made; without him
nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that
life was the light of all mankind.

It is necessary that we breakdown this verse.

(1) In the beginning... This represents the origin of the cosmos.
Refer to the discussion of Genesis 1:1 at the beginning of this
chapter.
                                 ~ 64 ~
(2) was the Word... The Word is Jesus. In Greek, Logos (λόγος)
can mean mind, reason, thought, wisdom, intelligence, idea, law,
order, purpose, and design.12 All of these attributes converge in
Jesus. Maybe the best translation for Logos is the “Mind of God”.
Therefore, Jesus is the Mind of God expressed in a physical body.
Logos is also the root for the English word Logic. So in essence,
when we use logic to reason we are confirming Jesus as the One
and only true expression of God.

(3) and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Jesus is
eternal and not separate from God; He is God. (See the
explanation for the Trinity at the end of chapter 1.)

(4) Through him all things were made; without him nothing was
made that has been made. Jesus is the Creator and He holds all
things together by His power. It is through Jesus that all things
abide. (See also Colossians 1:15-17.)

(5) In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. True
life can only be found in Jesus Christ alone. He came to this world
to shed light in darkness. Unfortunately, many still live in
darkness because they are deceived by philosophies that lead them
away from Jesus Christ, the “Light of the World” (John 3:19 and
John 8:12).

“The flow of this passage sets forth the parameters of Christian
philosophy: mind before matter; God before man; plan and design
before creation; life from life; and enlightenment from the Light.
The orderly universe was conceived in the orderly and rational
                               ~ 65 ~
mind of God before it was created. Without the Logos there would
be no cosmos.” 13

As you see, the special revelation of God is Jesus Christ Himself
who is revealed in the Word of God, and is the Word of God. Why
is the special revelation necessary for Salvation? It is because,
Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under
heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved (Acts 4:12).

The Works of God

Since God Created the world we can now turn to the specific
manner to which the Creation took place. We can divide the
creation process into two separate events; (1) creative (Bara) and
(2) formative (Asah and Yatsar).


Creative Works of God 14
   Creation of the physical elements of the universe-space, mass,
     energy, time (Genesis 1:1).
   Creation of conscious life (Hebrew Nephesh), including both
     soul and spirit (in the sense of “breath”). Animals possess
     components of both the created physical elements and
     conscious life (Genesis 1:21).
   Creation of human beings in the image of God. Men and
     women are tri-unities of body, soul, and spirit (in the sense of
     the divine image). The human body is much more complex
     than that of the highest animal, as is the human soul/breath
     complex. Only men and women possess, in addition, the
                               ~ 66 ~
image of God (Genesis 1:27).
   Figure 3:2 The illustration below shows the formative days of Creation.
      This illustration is the logo for Creation Education Ministries of
                               Thailand (CEMT).




Formative Works of God 14
   Day One: Energizing the cosmos, as centered in the light
    energy (Genesis 1:2-5)
   Day Two: Formation of the atmosphere (“firmament”) and
    hydrosphere, both of which are necessary for life and are
    unique to earth among the planets (Genesis 1:6-8).
   Day Three: Formation of the lithosphere (the solid earth) and
    biosphere (earth's cover of vegetation), a necessity for animal
                                     ~ 67 ~
life (Genesis 1:9-13).
     Day Four: Formation of astrosphere in a different
      “firmament” (Hebrew raqia, referring to an “expanse” of
      stretched-out place), including all the stars, galaxies and
      planets (Genesis 1:14-19).
     Day Five: Formation of different kinds of animals for the
      atmosphere (birds) and hydrosphere (fishes), each to
      reproduce only “after its kind” (Genesis 1:20-23).
     Day Six: Formation of different kinds of land animals for the
      lithosphere and biosphere, as well as one male body and one
      female body (Adam and Eve) to serve as progenitors of all
      later human beings (Genesis 1:24-31).
     Day Seven: Completion and sanctification of “all the work
      which God created and made” (Genesis 1:31-2:3).

The order described above accords perfectly with the observable
biological world. There are no contradictions present neither in the
order nor in the descriptions of organisms created. In fact, the order
presented above is far superior to any hypothesized evolutionary
development of the species through millions of years of random
mutations. It must be noted, however, that the order of the creation
events described in the Bible does not agree with modern
evolutionary theory. It is absolute absurdity to suggest that the
process of evolution and the Creation event in the Bible could
somehow be harmonized. We must remember that the law of non-
contradiction strictly forbids the possibility that contradictory
theories could both be true. We must conclude then, that either
Creation or evolution is logically impossible.

                                ~ 68 ~
Evolution                             Creation
  Sun before earth          Earth before sun
  Dry land before sea       Sea before dry land
  Sea creatures before land Land plants before                            sea
  plants                    creatures
  Stars before earth        Earth before stars
  Death before man          Man before death
  Reptiles before birds     Birds before reptiles

  Figure 3:3 This is a sampling of contradictions in the order of appearance on
     earth. There are hundreds of contradictions between these two beliefs.



There is one more very persuasive point to be made in relation to
the days of creation described in the Bible. Most (if not all)
cultures around the world function on a six day work week with
one day rest. Although the day of rest may be different for different
cultures, the scenario remains consistent. Henry Morris speaks of
this fact when he notes, “The most fascinating aspect of
chronology is the history of the “week,” which has no astronomical
basis. The “day” is measured by the regular appearance of the sun
as the earth rotates; the “year” is measured by the annual rotation
of the heavens as the earth orbits the sun; the “month” is measured
approximately by the moon's lunations, or intervals between new
moons, caused by the revolution of the moon around the earth. The
week, however, has no astronomical basis at all, yet people
everywhere have always observed a weekly cycle: six days of
work and a day of rest.”15 There seems to be no other reasonable
                                     ~ 69 ~
explanation except that in all cultures of the world there remains a
remnant of the true creation week, passed down through the ages
and modified in different cultures, but nevertheless still present in
basic form. In the observation of the week itself there is a silent but
powerful witness that confirms, ...in six days the LORD made the
heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested
on the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day
and made it holy (Exodus 20:11).

Thermodynamics and Evolution

Besides the Law of Causality, mentioned extensively in the
previous chapter, there are two other laws that are intriquatly
related to the created world. These laws are the 1st and 2nd Laws of
Thermodynamics, or more commonly the law of conservation of
energy and the law of increased entropy. After God created the
space-mass-time cosmos it is evident that He set in place these
laws to sustain His created world. “In its simplest form, the First
Law of Thermodynamics states that neither matter nor energy can
be created or destroyed. The amount of energy in the universe is
constant – energy can be changed, moved, controlled, stored, or
dissipated. However, this energy cannot be created from nothing or
reduced to nothing. Every natural process transforms energy and
moves energy, but cannot create or eliminate it. This principle
forms a foundation for many of the physical sciences.”16 The
second law likewise states that, “Entropy is defined as a measure
of unusable energy within a closed or isolated system (the universe
for example). As usable energy decreases and unusable energy
increases, "entropy" increases. Entropy is also a gauge of
                                ~ 70 ~
randomness or chaos within a closed system. As usable energy is
irretrievably lost, disorganization, randomness and chaos
increase.”17 Both of these laws are extensions of the Law of
Causality. We find that energy can change forms but not be
completely destroyed. At the same time, energy is becoming less
available to biological systems and is therefore contributing to
increased disorder in living organisms. These two laws are easily
observed in nature, especially the Second Law. For example, as
we age our bodies become less able to function at the level it once
did. This natural deterioration of our bodies shows that the Second
Law affects all aspects of the cosmos as disorder increases over
time. Once again, the evolutionary worldview is at a loss to explain
the existence of these laws. But it is worse still for an evolutionist
because these laws are contradictory to the mechanisms of
evolution. So, not only can an evolutionist not explain their
existence, their existence disproves evolution.

To exemplify just how the Second Law is contrary to evolution
consider the origin of life. An evolutionist believes that life began
as a single-celled organism. This single-celled organism must have
been very basic with few anatomical structures, information (in the
form of DNA), or chemical pathways, etc. Therefore, according to
an evolutionist this very basic organism must have continually,
over millions of years, become more and more complex, until it
produced the extremely complex organisms we see today. This
required building process for evolution though, is not in agreement
with the Second Law. The Second Law explains how organisms
are in a state of decline and how they are continually becoming
more disordered and disorganized. Evolution demands an upward
movement from basic to complex while the Second Law demands
                                ~ 71 ~
a downward movement from complex to basic. Obviously, both of
these processes cannot be functioning at the same time or they
would negate each other and according to the Law of Non-
Contradiction, one of these explanations must be invalid. The
Second Law is one of the most understood and observed laws in all
of science and its consistency in all known realms of science make
it a trustworthy law. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about
evolution. The Second Law states conclusively that complexity
must have existed from the beginning, not built gradually.
Complexity from the beginning not only supports the biblical
explanation of creation but also is confirmed by science itself, in
the Law of Biogenesis (see the next section).




                              ~ 72 ~
Figure 3:4 Compare the two graphs above. Notice that the evolutionary model
  and the Creation model are directly opposite of each other. The Second Law of
      Thermodynamics clearly supports the Creation model and opposes the
                              evolutionary model. .



Life Comes From Life (Omne Vivum Ex Vivo)

There is one last law that demands some mention as it relates to the
origin of life. As has been discussed previously, evolutionists
believe that life came from non-living matter. This is a direct
violation of the Law of Biogenesis, which states that life arises
from pre-existing life, not from nonliving material. The Law of
Biogenesis is an extension of the Law of Cause-and-Effect, in this
                                     ~ 73 ~
case, “like begets like”. Evolutionists have been forced to propose
fairy-tale like stories in order to violate this law. “The evolutionist
faces a great temptation here, a serious stumbling block to his
faith. It seems utterly impossible that dead matter could create life.
At this point, surely, he will have to defer to logic and
acknowledge that life must be produced by a Cause which is itself
alive. After all, scientists long ago showed experimentally that life
comes only from life. Ah, but not so! The evolutionist's faith is
strong enough to surmount even this barrier.” 18

As has been shown, evolution is a theory that is contrary to many
established laws of science; therefore, it should be examined
critically before one believes in its premises. It is not the purpose
of this book to identify all of the weaknesses in evolutionary
theory (for which there are many) nor give a long list of evidences
in favor of biblical creation (for which there are many), but to
show the validity and accuracy of the Bible and the dependency of
science upon it. Evidence itself can be twisted and turned to one's
own worldview and so evidence is a very subjective sort of proof.
Nevertheless, in the next few paragraphs several key evidences
will be examined and in the end you will see that the biblical
creation model far exceeds any evolutionary explanation for the
same phenomenon.

Biblical Kinds

It is a fact of common observation that organisms are very similar
in structure and function. We observe that mammals are all
similar, birds are all similar, frogs are all similar, and so on. Not
                                ~ 74 ~
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill
Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Paul.lesson.5.babylonian.captivity.teacher
Paul.lesson.5.babylonian.captivity.teacherPaul.lesson.5.babylonian.captivity.teacher
Paul.lesson.5.babylonian.captivity.teacherJohn Wible
 
God's Rest- Hebrews 3:7-19
God's Rest- Hebrews 3:7-19God's Rest- Hebrews 3:7-19
God's Rest- Hebrews 3:7-19Antonio Bernard
 
Changed into His Likeness - Watchman Nee.pdf
Changed into His Likeness - Watchman Nee.pdfChanged into His Likeness - Watchman Nee.pdf
Changed into His Likeness - Watchman Nee.pdfKingdom Minds Renewal Hub
 
The Word - The Science of Biblical Intepretation - Part 3
The Word - The Science of Biblical Intepretation - Part 3The Word - The Science of Biblical Intepretation - Part 3
The Word - The Science of Biblical Intepretation - Part 3Robin Schumacher
 
146662872 the-price-of-god-s-miracle-working-power-a-a-allen
146662872 the-price-of-god-s-miracle-working-power-a-a-allen146662872 the-price-of-god-s-miracle-working-power-a-a-allen
146662872 the-price-of-god-s-miracle-working-power-a-a-allenKaturi Susmitha
 
Lead us not into temptations
Lead us not into temptationsLead us not into temptations
Lead us not into temptationsAlex Tang
 
The signs of god in the life of man
The signs of god in the life of manThe signs of god in the life of man
The signs of god in the life of manGLENN PEASE
 
Jesus was an angel
Jesus was an angelJesus was an angel
Jesus was an angelGLENN PEASE
 
Sbs Class January 24 2010
Sbs Class January 24 2010Sbs Class January 24 2010
Sbs Class January 24 2010BertBrim
 
Bible study part 2
Bible study   part 2Bible study   part 2
Bible study part 2ijcparish
 
ACE 2016: God's Divine Nature
ACE 2016: God's Divine NatureACE 2016: God's Divine Nature
ACE 2016: God's Divine Natureaustinexec
 
11.03.04 2nd article jesus christ
11.03.04 2nd article jesus christ11.03.04 2nd article jesus christ
11.03.04 2nd article jesus christJustin Morris
 
Bible study quiz set 1
Bible study quiz   set 1Bible study quiz   set 1
Bible study quiz set 1ijcparish
 
Bible study part 1
Bible study   part 1Bible study   part 1
Bible study part 1ijcparish
 
The Word - Preconditons For Studying The Bible
The Word - Preconditons For Studying The BibleThe Word - Preconditons For Studying The Bible
The Word - Preconditons For Studying The BibleRobin Schumacher
 
Jesus was one with the father
Jesus was one with the fatherJesus was one with the father
Jesus was one with the fatherGLENN PEASE
 
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 2
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 2The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 2
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 2Robin Schumacher
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Paul.lesson.5.babylonian.captivity.teacher
Paul.lesson.5.babylonian.captivity.teacherPaul.lesson.5.babylonian.captivity.teacher
Paul.lesson.5.babylonian.captivity.teacher
 
God's Rest- Hebrews 3:7-19
God's Rest- Hebrews 3:7-19God's Rest- Hebrews 3:7-19
God's Rest- Hebrews 3:7-19
 
Changed into His Likeness - Watchman Nee.pdf
Changed into His Likeness - Watchman Nee.pdfChanged into His Likeness - Watchman Nee.pdf
Changed into His Likeness - Watchman Nee.pdf
 
Deity of Christ 2013
Deity of Christ 2013Deity of Christ 2013
Deity of Christ 2013
 
The Word - The Science of Biblical Intepretation - Part 3
The Word - The Science of Biblical Intepretation - Part 3The Word - The Science of Biblical Intepretation - Part 3
The Word - The Science of Biblical Intepretation - Part 3
 
146662872 the-price-of-god-s-miracle-working-power-a-a-allen
146662872 the-price-of-god-s-miracle-working-power-a-a-allen146662872 the-price-of-god-s-miracle-working-power-a-a-allen
146662872 the-price-of-god-s-miracle-working-power-a-a-allen
 
Lead us not into temptations
Lead us not into temptationsLead us not into temptations
Lead us not into temptations
 
The signs of god in the life of man
The signs of god in the life of manThe signs of god in the life of man
The signs of god in the life of man
 
Jesus was an angel
Jesus was an angelJesus was an angel
Jesus was an angel
 
Sbs Class January 24 2010
Sbs Class January 24 2010Sbs Class January 24 2010
Sbs Class January 24 2010
 
October 8, 2010
October 8, 2010October 8, 2010
October 8, 2010
 
Bible study part 2
Bible study   part 2Bible study   part 2
Bible study part 2
 
ACE 2016: God's Divine Nature
ACE 2016: God's Divine NatureACE 2016: God's Divine Nature
ACE 2016: God's Divine Nature
 
11.03.04 2nd article jesus christ
11.03.04 2nd article jesus christ11.03.04 2nd article jesus christ
11.03.04 2nd article jesus christ
 
Bible study quiz set 1
Bible study quiz   set 1Bible study quiz   set 1
Bible study quiz set 1
 
Bible study part 1
Bible study   part 1Bible study   part 1
Bible study part 1
 
The Word - Preconditons For Studying The Bible
The Word - Preconditons For Studying The BibleThe Word - Preconditons For Studying The Bible
The Word - Preconditons For Studying The Bible
 
Pick up your pen and write
Pick up your pen and writePick up your pen and write
Pick up your pen and write
 
Jesus was one with the father
Jesus was one with the fatherJesus was one with the father
Jesus was one with the father
 
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 2
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 2The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 2
The Word - The Science of Biblical Interpretation - Part 2
 

Andere mochten auch

เรื่องของชายชาวอังกฤษที่มีหนวดเคราสีขาวสองคน โลกทัศน์หรือมุมมองทั้งหมดถูกต้อง...
เรื่องของชายชาวอังกฤษที่มีหนวดเคราสีขาวสองคน โลกทัศน์หรือมุมมองทั้งหมดถูกต้อง...เรื่องของชายชาวอังกฤษที่มีหนวดเคราสีขาวสองคน โลกทัศน์หรือมุมมองทั้งหมดถูกต้อง...
เรื่องของชายชาวอังกฤษที่มีหนวดเคราสีขาวสองคน โลกทัศน์หรือมุมมองทั้งหมดถูกต้อง...Creation Education Ministries of Thailand
 
Apologetics - สาขาของศาสนศาสตร์ที่เกี่ยวกับการป้องกันหรือพิสูจน์ความเชื่อของศ...
Apologetics - สาขาของศาสนศาสตร์ที่เกี่ยวกับการป้องกันหรือพิสูจน์ความเชื่อของศ...Apologetics - สาขาของศาสนศาสตร์ที่เกี่ยวกับการป้องกันหรือพิสูจน์ความเชื่อของศ...
Apologetics - สาขาของศาสนศาสตร์ที่เกี่ยวกับการป้องกันหรือพิสูจน์ความเชื่อของศ...Creation Education Ministries of Thailand
 
เรื่องจริงเกี่ยวกับความตาย ชีวิต และความรักอันล้ำเลิศ
เรื่องจริงเกี่ยวกับความตาย ชีวิต และความรักอันล้ำเลิศเรื่องจริงเกี่ยวกับความตาย ชีวิต และความรักอันล้ำเลิศ
เรื่องจริงเกี่ยวกับความตาย ชีวิต และความรักอันล้ำเลิศCreation Education Ministries of Thailand
 

Andere mochten auch (6)

เรื่องของชายชาวอังกฤษที่มีหนวดเคราสีขาวสองคน โลกทัศน์หรือมุมมองทั้งหมดถูกต้อง...
เรื่องของชายชาวอังกฤษที่มีหนวดเคราสีขาวสองคน โลกทัศน์หรือมุมมองทั้งหมดถูกต้อง...เรื่องของชายชาวอังกฤษที่มีหนวดเคราสีขาวสองคน โลกทัศน์หรือมุมมองทั้งหมดถูกต้อง...
เรื่องของชายชาวอังกฤษที่มีหนวดเคราสีขาวสองคน โลกทัศน์หรือมุมมองทั้งหมดถูกต้อง...
 
Apologetics - สาขาของศาสนศาสตร์ที่เกี่ยวกับการป้องกันหรือพิสูจน์ความเชื่อของศ...
Apologetics - สาขาของศาสนศาสตร์ที่เกี่ยวกับการป้องกันหรือพิสูจน์ความเชื่อของศ...Apologetics - สาขาของศาสนศาสตร์ที่เกี่ยวกับการป้องกันหรือพิสูจน์ความเชื่อของศ...
Apologetics - สาขาของศาสนศาสตร์ที่เกี่ยวกับการป้องกันหรือพิสูจน์ความเชื่อของศ...
 
เรื่องจริงเกี่ยวกับความตาย ชีวิต และความรักอันล้ำเลิศ
เรื่องจริงเกี่ยวกับความตาย ชีวิต และความรักอันล้ำเลิศเรื่องจริงเกี่ยวกับความตาย ชีวิต และความรักอันล้ำเลิศ
เรื่องจริงเกี่ยวกับความตาย ชีวิต และความรักอันล้ำเลิศ
 
Augstākās izglītības finansēšanas reforma Latvijā
Augstākās izglītības finansēšanas reforma LatvijāAugstākās izglītības finansēšanas reforma Latvijā
Augstākās izglītības finansēšanas reforma Latvijā
 
Bangjak creationphotos
Bangjak creationphotosBangjak creationphotos
Bangjak creationphotos
 
Ageofthe earthphotos
Ageofthe earthphotosAgeofthe earthphotos
Ageofthe earthphotos
 

Ähnlich wie Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill

86441038 prosperity-of-the-soul-jerry-savelle
86441038 prosperity-of-the-soul-jerry-savelle86441038 prosperity-of-the-soul-jerry-savelle
86441038 prosperity-of-the-soul-jerry-savelleKaturi Susmitha
 
Bereshith genesis 1-6:8
Bereshith  genesis 1-6:8Bereshith  genesis 1-6:8
Bereshith genesis 1-6:8Sandy Kress
 
The two revelations
The two revelationsThe two revelations
The two revelationsGLENN PEASE
 
The plain man and his bible
The plain man and his bibleThe plain man and his bible
The plain man and his bibleGLENN PEASE
 
iWitness: is the God of the Bible God?
iWitness: is the God of the Bible God?iWitness: is the God of the Bible God?
iWitness: is the God of the Bible God?Stephen Palm
 
Angels_on_Assignment_(Roland_Buck.pdf
Angels_on_Assignment_(Roland_Buck.pdfAngels_on_Assignment_(Roland_Buck.pdf
Angels_on_Assignment_(Roland_Buck.pdfJESHURUNKATURI
 
Do We Worship the Same God? A Challenge of Dialogue
Do We Worship the Same God? A Challenge of DialogueDo We Worship the Same God? A Challenge of Dialogue
Do We Worship the Same God? A Challenge of DialogueRobert Munson
 
The history of the bible
The history of the bibleThe history of the bible
The history of the bibleSeanWBegle
 
196258837 living-in-divine-prosperity-jerry-savelle
196258837 living-in-divine-prosperity-jerry-savelle196258837 living-in-divine-prosperity-jerry-savelle
196258837 living-in-divine-prosperity-jerry-savelleKaturi Susmitha
 
Is The Bible God's Word
Is The Bible God's WordIs The Bible God's Word
Is The Bible God's WordAhmed@3604
 
Understanding God's Word
Understanding God's WordUnderstanding God's Word
Understanding God's WordSpiritualibrary
 
30th january 2016 can you answer five questions from the bible
30th january 2016   can you answer five questions from the bible30th january 2016   can you answer five questions from the bible
30th january 2016 can you answer five questions from the bibleThorn Group Pvt Ltd
 
El Shaddai-The Mother Goddess, An Open Letter To ISUPK
El Shaddai-The Mother Goddess, An Open Letter To ISUPKEl Shaddai-The Mother Goddess, An Open Letter To ISUPK
El Shaddai-The Mother Goddess, An Open Letter To ISUPKIsrael Doctrine
 
170181411 misguided-faith norvel hayes
170181411 misguided-faith norvel hayes170181411 misguided-faith norvel hayes
170181411 misguided-faith norvel hayesKaturi Susmitha
 
The Trinity and Church History
The Trinity and Church HistoryThe Trinity and Church History
The Trinity and Church HistoryBertBrim
 

Ähnlich wie Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill (20)

86441038 prosperity-of-the-soul-jerry-savelle
86441038 prosperity-of-the-soul-jerry-savelle86441038 prosperity-of-the-soul-jerry-savelle
86441038 prosperity-of-the-soul-jerry-savelle
 
Bereshith genesis 1-6:8
Bereshith  genesis 1-6:8Bereshith  genesis 1-6:8
Bereshith genesis 1-6:8
 
Crystal wisdom bible111
Crystal wisdom bible111Crystal wisdom bible111
Crystal wisdom bible111
 
The two revelations
The two revelationsThe two revelations
The two revelations
 
The plain man and his bible
The plain man and his bibleThe plain man and his bible
The plain man and his bible
 
Holyspirit
HolyspiritHolyspirit
Holyspirit
 
The Christ Factor
The Christ FactorThe Christ Factor
The Christ Factor
 
iWitness: is the God of the Bible God?
iWitness: is the God of the Bible God?iWitness: is the God of the Bible God?
iWitness: is the God of the Bible God?
 
Angels_on_Assignment_(Roland_Buck.pdf
Angels_on_Assignment_(Roland_Buck.pdfAngels_on_Assignment_(Roland_Buck.pdf
Angels_on_Assignment_(Roland_Buck.pdf
 
Do We Worship the Same God? A Challenge of Dialogue
Do We Worship the Same God? A Challenge of DialogueDo We Worship the Same God? A Challenge of Dialogue
Do We Worship the Same God? A Challenge of Dialogue
 
The history of the bible
The history of the bibleThe history of the bible
The history of the bible
 
196258837 living-in-divine-prosperity-jerry-savelle
196258837 living-in-divine-prosperity-jerry-savelle196258837 living-in-divine-prosperity-jerry-savelle
196258837 living-in-divine-prosperity-jerry-savelle
 
Is The Bible God's Word
Is The Bible God's WordIs The Bible God's Word
Is The Bible God's Word
 
Understanding God's Word
Understanding God's WordUnderstanding God's Word
Understanding God's Word
 
Leviticus
LeviticusLeviticus
Leviticus
 
The Lord and His Church
The Lord and His ChurchThe Lord and His Church
The Lord and His Church
 
30th january 2016 can you answer five questions from the bible
30th january 2016   can you answer five questions from the bible30th january 2016   can you answer five questions from the bible
30th january 2016 can you answer five questions from the bible
 
El Shaddai-The Mother Goddess, An Open Letter To ISUPK
El Shaddai-The Mother Goddess, An Open Letter To ISUPKEl Shaddai-The Mother Goddess, An Open Letter To ISUPK
El Shaddai-The Mother Goddess, An Open Letter To ISUPK
 
170181411 misguided-faith norvel hayes
170181411 misguided-faith norvel hayes170181411 misguided-faith norvel hayes
170181411 misguided-faith norvel hayes
 
The Trinity and Church History
The Trinity and Church HistoryThe Trinity and Church History
The Trinity and Church History
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Seán Kennedy
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)cama23
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemChristalin Nelson
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4MiaBumagat1
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemChristalin Nelson
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designMIPLM
 
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTS
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTSGRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTS
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTSJoshuaGantuangco2
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYKayeClaireEstoconing
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...Postal Advocate Inc.
 
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture hons
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture honsFood processing presentation for bsc agriculture hons
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture honsManeerUddin
 
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdfICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdfVanessa Camilleri
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptxmary850239
 
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptxmary850239
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)lakshayb543
 
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptxKarra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptxAshokKarra1
 
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxBarangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxCarlos105
 
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptIntegumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptshraddhaparab530
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxLEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
 
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
 
Transaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management SystemTransaction Management in Database Management System
Transaction Management in Database Management System
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
 
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTS
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTSGRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTS
GRADE 4 - SUMMATIVE TEST QUARTER 4 ALL SUBJECTS
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
 
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
USPS® Forced Meter Migration - How to Know if Your Postage Meter Will Soon be...
 
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture hons
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture honsFood processing presentation for bsc agriculture hons
Food processing presentation for bsc agriculture hons
 
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdfICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
ICS2208 Lecture6 Notes for SL spaces.pdf
 
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
4.16.24 21st Century Movements for Black Lives.pptx
 
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
4.16.24 Poverty and Precarity--Desmond.pptx
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
 
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptxKarra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
Karra SKD Conference Presentation Revised.pptx
 
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptxBarangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
Barangay Council for the Protection of Children (BCPC) Orientation.pptx
 
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptIntegumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
 

Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill

  • 1. ~0~
  • 3. Knowing the Unknown God English (1st Printing) PDF (online version) Creation Education Ministries of Thailand 1256/3 Sukhumvit 101/1 Rd. Bangjak, Prakanong, BKK 10260 www.creationthai.org © 2011 by Andrew McCaskill. All rights reserved. The author grants the free distribution of this PDF online version by any means (photocopy, electronic, or otherwise) as long as the distribution is always in whole (not in part) and that no alterations or manipulations are made to the original manuscript. All quotations taken from this book should be cited under normal copy rights guidelines. Cover illustration by Raffaello Sanzio (1483–1520), St Paul Preaching in Athens (Royal Collection of the United Kingdom) Public Domain Image: This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. Accessed from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:V%26A_- _Raphael,_St_Paul_Preaching_in_Athens_(1515).jpg#file Printed in Thailand ISBN: Free Online Version All scripture quotations, unless otherwise indicated, are taken from the Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV®. Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984 by Biblica, Inc.™ Used by permission of Zondervan. All rights reserved worldwide. www.zondervan.com ~2~
  • 4. Dedication I dedicate this book to the students at International Community School in Bangkok and to the many other students in high schools and universities throughout Thailand in which I have had the privilege of presenting these topics in person. I also dedicate this book to the many Thais who have helped me in translation efforts. Mostly, I dedicate this book to my wife and family who have shared with me the adventure of Knowing the Unknown God. ~3~
  • 5. We hope you will enjoy this FREE ebook, Knowing the Unknown God by Andrew McCaskill. It is our pleasure to share it with you. If you would like to purchase a souvenir copy of the paperback book or would like to send one as a gift, please visit www.creationthai.org for more information. ~4~
  • 6. Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………..7 Chapter 1 - The God of the Bible……………………12 Chapter 2 -The God of Logic………………………26 Chapter 3-The God of Creation……………………..52 Chapter 4 -The God of Man………………………89 Chapter 5 -The God of the Nations………………….103 Chapter 6 -The God of Salvation……………………128 Chapter 7 -Knowing the Unknown God……………...150 ~5~
  • 7. ~6~
  • 8. Introduction “TO AN UNKNOWN GOD” read the altar. Around two-thousand years ago a man named Paul stared at an unusual idol in the city of Athens. This idol was amidst other idols and was not terribly different except for its strange inscription. Why was there an altar to an unknown god? Athens was a very religious city in Paul‟s day. The people of that city were held captive to the many gods they feared. In fact, they were afraid that they had forgotten to worship a certain god. Knowing that any god who was left out of their worship would likely be jealous, mad, bitter, and vengeful, they decided to make one altar “TO AN UNKNOWN GOD” in order to appease any forgotten god. You might, like the people of Athens, be unsure whether God (or many gods) exists, and so, just like the Athenians, you attempt to appease whatever god might exist. Or, you might be very religious like the Athenians and worship your god to the exclusion of all other gods. Even so, some of you might insist that no god exists and therefore you feel free to live like you are your own god. To those who are confident that god (or multiple gods) does exist, this book will challenge your concept of God and in the end you will have a greater understanding of who God is and how you can know Him to a greater degree. ~7~
  • 9. To those who are not sure if God exists or are convinced that there is no God, this book will challenge your belief at its very core. After reading this book, I believe that you will no longer be able to claim the non-existence of God. I also believe that you will conclude that any alternate view of reality (i.e. the Theory of Evolution) is inadequate to account for the existence of the universe and life. It is the purpose of this book to present a compelling case for the existence of God. I KNOW beyond any doubt that God exists and I am confident that I know WHO God is. Just as Paul did in Athens so many years ago, I will attempt to introduce you to the “Unknown God” (and therefore make the “Unknown God” the “Known God”). I invite you to read the entirety of this book and consider every point that is made. If you are a thinking person - one who seeks wisdom - then this book is a must read. If you are curious and scientifically minded, you will not be able to ignore the claims made in this book. The Athenians questioned every new theory and I invite you to also question my findings as well. I have divided this book into seven chapters. These chapters are briefly outlined below. Chapter 1 will identify the “Unknown God”, “for surely there is no sense in talking about the existence of God, without knowing what kind of God it is who may or may not exist.”1 ~8~
  • 10. Chapter 2 will present the God of Logic. Only with a concept of God can anyone think logically. Those who claim that there is no God are thinking illogically. Chapter 3 will present the God of Creation. Only God as the Grand Cause can explain the presence of our universe. A universe without God is impossible. Chapter 4 will present the God of Man. Humans are reflections of God and we can know a lot about God from our own character. Unfortunately, humans are also separated from God because of our sin. Chapter 5 will present the God of the Nations. God is the God of every nation, people, and language. Chapter 6 will present the God of Salvation. God‟s purpose has always been to restore a lost relationship with humans. God has provided a way to restore a relationship with Him and have salvation. Chapter 7 will present the “Unknown God” as the “Known God”. God is not far from us and is evident to us in the most obvious ways. I encourage you to read this book in the order of the chapters. If you begin at a later chapter, or if you skip from chapter to chapter, you will miss key points that were made in earlier chapters. Let‟s begin our journey to discover the “Unknown God”! ~9~
  • 11. Reference: 1 Van Til, Cornelius. Christian Apologetics. Phillipsburg: P & R Publishing Company, 2003. ~ 10 ~
  • 12. “I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.” Revelation 1:8 ~ 11 ~
  • 13. Chapter 1 The God of the Bible The Bible might be called “God's Book” because it makes some incredible statements about who God is, what He is like, and how we can relate to Him. The Bible also makes some incredible statements about who we are as well. Anyone searching for truth about their own existence, or about the purpose of life, should not dare ignore the words contained within the pages of the Bible. These words reveal to us the identity of God, who is beyond our own comprehension (Isaiah 40:28). Upon reading the Bible one quickly realizes that the words are both biographical and autobiographical at the same time. That is, the words of the Bible reveal God's own description of Himself, channeled through people who were compelled to write about His majesty, power, and love. Many people believe that the Bible is a book of rules and regulations only, “but in fact the Bible is first of all a book about God. It tells us all we need to know, and all we ~ 12 ~
  • 14. shall ever need to know, about God: who He is, what He is like, what He does and, of course, how we can know Him.”1 We can correctly summarize that the Bible is a unique presentation of God's own story played out in the hearts and minds of humanity. The Bible, however, is much more than a collection of wonderful stories. Every story throughout the sixty-six individual books of the Bible tells a larger story. The whole Bible paints a picture of a loving Creator who is determined to win back the people He created from the tragic error of their own rebellious decision. In order to win them back He chooses to enter His own creation (Jesus) and do for them what they could not do for themselves. The Bible is above all a love story and we are the objects of God's affection. So, in this sense, our biographies are written into the Biblical story also. The Bible is no fairy-tell with a fictitious plot, rather, the Bible presents itself as absolute truth. In Psalm 119 alone, 171 of the 176 verses speak of the Bible and its power, might, and accuracy. Of key interest in this discussion is verse 160 that says, All your words are true; all your righteous laws are eternal. Several verses earlier it states in similar fashion, Your righteousness is everlasting and your law is true (142). Verse 151 of the same chapter repeats the claim, Yet you are near, LORD, and all your commands are true. We see three references here (words, law, commands) but each signifies the same thing; the Bible (or Word of God) is true. Psalm 119 is a critical chapter because it validates itself as a source of Truth. Some may call this circular reasoning but God must reveal Himself to us or we would know nothing of His character. God, therefore, chose to reveal His words as truth (autobiographical) ~ 13 ~
  • 15. through the written word of human authors (biographical). There is no one higher or more powerful who can speak on God's behalf, so He must reveal His own character to us. Couple the verses above with Proverbs 30:5, which states, Every word of God is flawless; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar. In this verse we are commanded to never alter the Bible. This must mean, of course, that God's words are true and sacred, never to be changed from their original meaning by either adding or subtracting from them. They are flawless. When God speaks, His words are true and without any error. Therefore, the internal evidence of the Bible itself proves that the Bible is absolutely true in every way. If, hypothetically, any words in the Bible were false, then, according to this verse, God would be forced to rebuke Himself as a liar. But this is impossible, which leaves us with only one conclusion; God is Truth and His words are Truth. If this were not enough, we also have the words of Jesus Himself. In the book of John we are presented with a remarkable passage, In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God (1:1). Here, Jesus is the very expression of God in human form, the Word of God. Further in the book of John (14:6) we read, I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. Jesus is here claiming that He is absolute Truth and the only way to God. So, these two verses confirm yet again that God's Word is accurate and one-hundred percent true. The Bible is connecting the Truth (Jesus), the Word (the Bible, expressed through Jesus), and God as one entity. The Bible is therefore, God's Truthful Words expressed by and through Jesus Christ. There are other internal evidences also. The Bible's ~ 14 ~
  • 16. unity2, fulfilled prophesies, and power to change individual lives points to its Truth and accuracy. As seen above, the internal evidence of the Bible is sufficient enough to prove that the Bible is absolutely true, but there is also external evidence that suggests the same. The Bible is historically and archaeologically accurate. The Bible is also confirmed in its human authors, who were even martyred for their conviction of its truthfulness. The Bible speaks of changed lives, which can be just as strong evidence as scores of other evidences. Lastly, the Bible's endurance and indestructibility is also evidence for its truthfulness. Many have tried to destroy the Bible and to free the world of its teaching, but it has withstood every attack placed upon it, and in the end, those who have tried to destroy it have only proven that it is what they were hoping it was not; absolute Truth. Concerning the Bible's indestructibility, Jesus states the matter this way, Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away (Mark 13:31). The Bible leaves no doubt that its author is God Himself. As we have already read in Proverbs 30, Every word of God is flawless (5-6). We also read in the book of 2 Timothy, All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness... (3:16). God is certainly the author of the Bible even though it was written by human hands2. Since the Bible presents itself as absolute Truth and the author of those words is God Himself, then simple logic tells us that God must be absolute Truth as well. This stems from the fact that if the Bible communicates Truth, then the author of the Bible could be no ~ 15 ~
  • 17. less than its product. The scientific principle of causality (cause- and-effect) proves this to be the case (see chapter 2, The God of Logic). Any effect (the Bible in this case) is never greater than its cause (God). God must be Truth if the Bible is Truth, since the Bible is the product of God Himself. Therefore, the words of the Bible are God's true words, both revealing who God is and who we are. God doesn't lie, so His words can be trusted. In the book of Samuel this simple logic is confirmed, He who is the Glory of Israel does not lie or change his mind; for he is not a human being, that he should change his mind (1 Samuel 15:29). In the end, how can we know who God is? The Bible reveals Him to us and we can trust that the Bible accurately speaks of His character. Since the Bible is God's words about Himself, He would never misrepresent Himself. We can know for certain who God is and what He is like by reading the Bible. If you have ever wondered if there is a God and what God is like, the answer is found in the Bible alone, because He chose the Bible to be His story. The Characteristics below describe God's character. 1. God is the Creator of all material, biological, and spiritual things. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth (Genesis 1:1). There was nothing prior to God. God created matter, space, and time ex nihilo (out of nothing). God, however, is separate from His creation and is not contained within the dimensions of His own creation nor limited by them. (See chapter 3 for more explanation of God as the Creator.) ~ 16 ~
  • 18. 2. God is Eternal. Before the mountains were born or you brought forth the whole world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God (Psalm 90:2). This means that God had no beginning, nor will he have an end. God has always been in existence and will forever be. No one created God. He is an eternal being, separate from time itself, which He created. God will never cease to exist, nor be annihilated, nor is He contained within a cycle of events. 3. God is Unchanging. God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill? (Numbers 23:19) God is not like man. He does not lie, nor does He change his mind. God does not become other forms3 or change in nature. Man cannot become God. Of Jesus it is said, He is the same today, yesterday, and forever (Hebrews 13:8). 4. God is Incomparable. How great you are, Sovereign LORD! There is no one like you, and there is no God but you, as we have heard with our own ears (2 Samuel 7:22); Among the gods there is none like you, Lord; no deeds can compare with yours (Psalm 86:8). There is but one God. No other god (man-made or imagined) is equal to the God of the Bible. The God of the Bible is the only true God. 5. God is Indescribable. Do you not know? Have you not heard? The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He will not grow tired or weary, and his ~ 17 ~
  • 19. understanding no one can fathom (Isaiah 40:28). We will never be able to fully understand God. He is beyond our own comprehension. This does not mean that He is unknowable. We can know God's character by reading the Bible. 6. God is Fair. As for God, his way is perfect: The LORD‟s word is flawless; he shields all who take refuge in him (Psalm 18:30). God is a just ruler. He treats everyone fairly. Unfortunately, we are all sinners and have rejected God (Romans 3:23) and so our rejection of Him justifies our condemnation. Amazingly, God provides us grace through Jesus Christ, which we do not deserve. (See God is Gracious below.) 7. God is All-Powerful (Omnipotent). Ah, Sovereign LORD, you have made the heavens and the earth by your great power and outstretched arm. Nothing is too hard for you (Jeremiah 32:17). There is absolutely nothing that God cannot do. No other spiritual force can alter God's plan. All material, biological, and spiritual entities are under His control. God's power is always used in a way that is consistent with His character. 8. God is everywhere (Omnipresent). Where can I go from your Spirit? Where can I flee from your presence? If I go up to the heavens, you are there; if I make my bed in the depths, you are there. If I rise on the wings of the dawn, if I settle on the far side of the sea, even there your hand will guide me, your right hand will hold me fast. If I say, “Surely the darkness will hide ~ 18 ~
  • 20. me and the light become night around me,” even the darkness will not be dark to you; the night will shine like the day, for darkness is as light to you. For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother‟s womb (Psalm 139: 7-13). You cannot hide from God. He is everywhere at once. God is not limited by time, physical location, or material body. You cannot keep God in a box, in a house, or in a temple. God is Spirit and is free to come and go as He chooses. However, this does not mean that God is in everything or occupies everything. Nor does it mean that everything is God. The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by human hands. And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything. Rather, he himself gives everyone life and breath and everything else. From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands. God did this so that they would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from any one of us (Acts 17:24-27). 9. God is All-Knowing (Omniscient). You have searched me, LORD, and you know me. You know when I sit and when I rise; you perceive my thoughts from afar. You discern my going out and my lying down; you are familiar with all my ways. Before a word is on my tongue you, LORD, know it completely. You hem me in behind and before, and you lay your hand upon me (Psalm 139: 1-5). Only God knows everything. He knows the past, the present, and the future. ~ 19 ~
  • 21. Because God is All-Knowing, He is completely fair (as we have already discussed). 10. God is Righteous. But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, through the shedding of his blood—to be received by faith. He did this to demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished— he did it to demonstrate his righteousness at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus (Romans 3:21-26). Righteousness in simple terms means that God always does what is right and true according to His own nature. For example, it was right to punish humanity for sinning against Himself since our sin is a rejection of God's righteousness. If God ignored sin and didn't punish those who sin, He would no longer be righteous. 11. God is Sovereign. The LORD reigns, he is robed in majesty; the LORD is robed in majesty and armed with strength; indeed, the world is established, firm and secure (Psalm 93:1). God has complete reign and rule. No power (of man or of spiritual beings) is higher than God's power. His decisions ~ 20 ~
  • 22. and actions cannot be altered nor changed by man. Yours, LORD, is the greatness and the power and the glory and the majesty and the splendor, for everything in heaven and earth is yours. Yours, LORD, is the kingdom; you are exalted as head over all (1 Chronicles 29:11). 12. God is Spirit. God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth (John 4:24). God is invisible. He cannot completely be understood or perceived by man. This is why God must reveal Himself through the Bible (Truth). Otherwise, we would never be able to know God at all. The Spirit is one member of the Trinity.3 13. God is Truth. He who is the Glory of Israel does not lie or change his mind; for he is not a human being, that he should change his mind (1 Samuel 15:29). As has previously been determined, God is Truth. He cannot lie, ever! His Son, Jesus Christ, is the only way to know God and receive Salvation. This is because Jesus ...is the Way, the Truth, and the Life (John 14:6). 14. God is Holy. Holy, holy, holy is the LORD Almighty; the whole earth is full of his glory (Isaiah 6:3); Your eyes are too pure to look on evil; you cannot tolerate wrongdoing.... (Habakkuk 1:13). God is separated from humanity. He is different. God cannot tolerate sin and evil because it is contrary to His holiness and righteousness. God's holiness and our sinfulness have created a chasm between God and man, but God's graciousness through Jesus has united God and man ~ 21 ~
  • 23. once again. 15. God is Gracious. And he passed in front of Moses, proclaiming, “The LORD, the LORD, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness (Exodus 34:6). God gives us grace, which is undeserved favor. We deserve death because of our sinfulness, but God gives us life through Jesus Christ alone. 16. God is Love .God is love... (1 John 4:16); neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord (Romans 8:39); But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions—it is by grace you have been saved (Ephesians 2:4-5). God loves each one of us. His greatest love act was to send His Son, Christ Jesus, to save us from our sinful rebellion. God's love through Jesus is a gift that is given to all, but each individual must receive it through personal acknowledgement of Jesus Christ as Lord of their lives. God is love and He is grace, but He is also fair, which means that those who reject God's love and grace will be eternally separated from Him (Hell) after they die. Although, we will never completely understand God (remember He is indescribable) we gain a greater understanding of who He is by reading the Bible. God will continually reveal Himself to anyone who seeks to know Him with a pure heart. We are ~ 22 ~
  • 24. promised this in the book of Jeremiah; You will seek me and find me when you seek me with all your heart (Jeremiah 29:13). “As we read through Scripture and see God's character, we begin to understand His absolute authority and the authority of His Word... He is the starting point of biblical authority because He is the only limitless One and the only One who has always been, with full control of past, present, and future.”4 References and Notes: 1 Edwards, Brian H. Nothing But The Truth. Webster: Evangelical Press, 2007. 2 “One of the first internal evidences that the Bible is truly God‟s Word is seen in its unity. Even though it is really sixty-six individual books, written on three continents, in three different languages, over a period of approximately 1500 years, by more than 40 authors who came from many walks of life, the Bible remains one unified book from beginning to end without contradiction. This unity is unique from all other books and is evidence of the divine origin of the words which God moved men to record.” (Got Answers Ministries. “Attributes of God.” February, 6th 2011: http://www.gotquestions.org/attributes-God.html) 3 “The most difficult thing about the Christian concept of the Trinity is that there is no way to perfectly and completely understand it. The Trinity is a concept that is impossible for any human being to fully understand, let alone explain. God is infinitely greater than we are; therefore, we should not expect to be able to fully understand Him. The Bible teaches that the Father is God, that Jesus is God, and that the Holy Spirit is God. The Bible also teaches that there is only one God. Though we can understand some facts about the relationship of the different Persons of the Trinity to one another, ultimately, it is incomprehensible to the human mind. However, this does not mean the Trinity is not true or that it is not based on the teachings of the Bible.....The Trinity is one God existing in three ~ 23 ~
  • 25. Persons. Understand that this is not in any way suggesting three Gods.” (Got Answers Ministries. “What does the Bible teach about the Trinity.” February, 20th 2011:http://www.gotquestions.org/Trinity-Bible.html) 4 Ham, Steve. “It All Starts With God's Character.” Answers Magazine Jan.-Mar. 2011 pg. 81. ~ 24 ~
  • 26. It is undeniable that there is neither truth, meaning, nor purpose without an intelligent Creator who, for His own reasons, made the universe and each of us in His Image. Yet the world of academia largely rejects this inescapable fact. Professors and students claim to be on a quest for truth while denying that it exists or that anyone could identify it if it did. Such is the nihilistic atmosphere in major universities around the world. It is considered to be too dogmatic for anyone to claim that truth can be known. Then what is the point of research and study, if all we can achieve is a listing of differing opinions, none of which can be declared to be either right or wrong.” Dave Hunt, Seeking & Finding God, pp.47-48. . ~ 25 ~
  • 27. Chapter 2 The God of Logic Is Logic Absolute? Do you believe in logic? You might think this is a strange question to ask in a book about the identity of God, but I believe that this is an important place to begin our attempt to know who God is and what He is like. We have already identified many attributes of God's character in the first chapter. There is, however, another characteristic of God identified in the Bible that has not been mentioned yet. God is the God of logic. In simple terms, this means that God is the mind behind all things and that He created these things to function in predictable ways that can be understood by man. If logic is from God it must reflect the character and mind of God. God is infinite and omniscient, so therefore, we would expect logic to be absolute; the same for any human, anywhere, and at any time. Otherwise, logic would change as the wind blows or as the tides ~ 26 ~
  • 28. fluctuate, and we would never have the ability to trust our own knowledge. If this were the case, what was true one moment might not be true the next moment. But since God's character is consistent and unchanging, so are the fixed laws that are expressions of His mind. His laws are absolute and therefore, logic is possible. This is why we can understand the world around us. Later in this chapter we will discuss some of these absolute laws (Law of Non-Contradiction and the Law of Causality) that are expressions of God's character. Do you believe that this world operates by fixed laws? Scientific investigations and mathematical processes require fixed laws that are predictable and can be applied anywhere in the world, with identical results. In fact, every day we use simple logic to answer basic questions such as, “Why did this happen?” or “What caused this?” The truth is, we all believe in, and know intuitively, that logic exists, whether we want to admit it or not. The use of logic is the most fundamental and basic level of human knowledge. Notice again that the opening question is phrased do you believe in logic?, not, do you think logic exists? There is a critical difference between believing and thinking. Thinking is a mechanical process (electrical impulses bouncing around the neurons of the brain) which requires logical deductions to determine its own validity. There would be little true thought (arguably none) without the laws of logic firmly in place. Therefore, thought is dependent upon logic. Anyone trying to prove that logic exists quickly realizes that logic is automatically proven the moment the attempt is made to prove its validity. So, in the end, we believe in logic because thought is impossible without it. This may seem to be circular ~ 27 ~
  • 29. reasoning (which in itself is only understood in the light of logic) but logic turns out to be its own best witness. Logic Needs a Belief System In order to be logical at all, one must have a framework of belief. Logic is a matter of belief not just methodological thought processes. Let us return to the questions posed in the third paragraph, “Why did this happen?” and “What caused this?” It is impossible to answer these questions without belief in established laws. For example, when I ask the question, Why did this happen?, I automatically use laws of causality to trace the effect back to an original cause. I believe that all effects are a result of a cause and that I can come to a true understanding of what that cause might be. Most causes can neither be seen nor observed, and therefore, cannot be scientifically verified, but we believe in them anyway, and thus, we believe in the very laws of logic themselves. Worldviews and Presuppositions In the day to day affairs of life we use logic to determine whether something is true or false, valid or invalid, right or wrong, and we can do this effectively because of our personal beliefs which make logic possible. In order to help us interpret events, all of us have accepted a framework of belief, and this is what allows our logic to make sense of unknowable events. Because our knowledge is limited we must have a starting point (framework of belief) that all information is interpreted upon. ~ 28 ~
  • 30. Figure 2:1 Each of us knows a very small portion of the total available knowledge that could be known. Only God is All-Knowing. Therefore, in our attempt to make sense of unknown information we must begin with a bias or presupposition. (See Figure 2:1 in the notes and references section.) This framework of belief is often called a worldview. A worldview can be described as a belief that governs the way we interpret evidence and which also allows us to make sense of the world around us. Worldviews are composed of individual presuppositions or personal biases. These presuppositions are established early in our lives and are often difficult to change. Our presuppositions determine the way we interpret evidence, not the reverse. Evidence never speaks for itself, it is neutral, and we must interpret it according to a framework of belief.1 ~ 29 ~
  • 31. Figure 2:2 Notice that both an evolutionist and a Creationist have the same evidence and use the same laws of logic, the difference is their starting points (presuppositions) and their ending points (interpretations). Our biases, along with the laws of logic, allow us to interpret data and make sense of it. Although the laws of logic are the same for everyone, personal biases are not. This is why two people can look at the same evidence and come to two entirely different interpretations of the evidence. None of us are neutral and we use our biases as a framework of interpretation for all unknown information. So, not only must we believe that logic exists; we must also believe that our own biases are true. However, if personal biases are incorrect then the resulting interpretations will be incorrect. Therefore, it is important to have a correct bias in order to have a correct interpretation. ~ 30 ~
  • 32. Figure 2:3 For any one piece of evidence many different interpretations exist, therefore, we filter other people's interpretations before we accept them. Notice that if the interpretation agrees with our worldview, it is accepted, however, if the interpretation disagrees with our worldview it is rejected. This is the manner in which each of us filters interpretations before we accept or deny them. What Mean Ye These Stones (Fossils)? Let's consider some evidence to show how presuppositions govern the way evidence is interpreted. At many locations around the world we find “fossil graveyards”. These are areas with hundreds or even thousands of individual organisms that have all been fossilized together in one location. Often these fossils represent ~ 31 ~
  • 33. organisms that did not live together in the same ecological location. Because an evolutionist's presupposition denies the existence of God and the truthfulness of the Bible, he must account for these unusual fossil formations by natural processes alone. Therefore, the typical story of fossil formation according to an evolutionist begins with an organism's death. The organism is then covered by water-laden sediment and through a slow process and the right amount of pressure; the cells of the organism are replaced by sediment and become rock. This rock is a cast of the original organism with the same physical features as the once living organism. Evolutionists would consider fossilization a unique event, which is rarely observed, if ever, in the present. “Fossil graveyards” then, pose a significant challenge to the evolutionary explanation as evolutionists are hard-pressed to account for a method that would fossilize thousands of organisms in the same physical location under normal conditions. There are no known “natural” conditions today that are fossilizing thousands of organisms at once, especially organisms from different ecological zones. Since these conditions are not observed today, evolutionists are forced to explain “fossil graveyards” as a long duration (millions of years) event. The problem with a “millions of years” explanation is that the bones of many of these fossilized organisms are interlocked together. Bones cannot become interlocked together if the organisms from which they came died millions of years apart. Secondly, as has been stated above, many of these fossils are from organisms that do not normally live together in the same ecological zone. This suggests that these organisms did not die in the same location but died in other ecological zones and were transported (most likely by moving water) to the location where they were buried and fossilized. ~ 32 ~
  • 34. When it comes to “fossil graveyards”, evolutionists face an explanatory problem because their own theory of slow fossil formation over millions of years isn't adequate to explain the thousands of fossils buried together. There must be a better explanation. There is! The Bible speaks of a global flood (Genesis 8-10) that covered the entire earth with water. This global flood killed most organisms on the planet at that time. The organisms that died in the flood would have been carried great distances by the water and covered rapidly by the advancing waters and swirling oceans. This global flood explains perfectly how organisms from different ecological zones were carried to the same location and buried together. The flood also explains how the quantities (thousands) of organisms were buried together. Lastly, the flood provides the most ideal water- laden sediment and pressure that were required for the organisms to be fossilized. The Biblical flood sufficiently answers all of the questions regarding the formation of fossil graveyards but an evolutionary worldview is insufficient to do the same. So, why doesn't an evolutionist accept the Biblical explanation? It certainly seems far superior to their own explanation. Evolutionists reject this explanation, not because it is invalid, less superior, or less scientific to their own, but because it comes from the Bible. Therefore, they do not reject the explanation, but the Bible. Evolutionists might even agree that the Biblical explanation is a better explanation, but they will not accept it simply because it is from the Bible. Evolutionists are letting their own presuppositions (that there is no God and the Bible is not true) ~ 33 ~
  • 35. force them to accept an explanation that is less than sufficient. It is most tragic that an evolutionist, who supposedly prides himself on being scientific, will reject the most scientific explanation simply because it supports an alternate viewpoint than his own. The often quoted evolutionary scientist Richard Lewontin exemplifies this tragic viewpoint when he said, “We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.” 2 Logic and Contradiction The law of non-contradiction states that contradictory statements cannot both be true at the same time. For example, if it is said that A is greater than B and that A is not greater than B, then one statement is false because both statements cannot possibly be true at the same time. The law of non-contradiction is a law that is impossible to deny. The very moment one declares that the law of non-contradiction is untrue, it is proven. Denying the law sets up ~ 34 ~
  • 36. two contradictory statements from which one is expected to be true, and so, its denial verifies its validity. An identical situation exists when some religions claim that two contradictory statements can both be true at the same time, thus attempting to deny the law of non-contradiction to avoid apparent contradictions in their own religion. In communicating this, however, they must set their statement (that contradictory statements can both be true) against the law of non-contradiction itself, which forces a contradiction between the two. In the end, instead of disproving the law of non- contradiction, they verify it. The denial of an absolute reality and the denial of an absolute truth are also common claims among certain religions, but, once again the absolute belief that no absolute reality or absolute truth exists places the two beliefs in contradiction with the former (that they do exist), and thus, the law of non-contradiction is proven yet again.3This is why the Law of Contradiction is truly a universal law? Two contradictory statements cannot both be true because God never contradicts Himself. God is absolute Truth and He never lies. God created the universe to reflect His character so that we may know Him and develop knowledge through understanding His creation. Science is possible because God is Truth and His creation reflects His character. If there was no God, we would have no possible way to understand the physical world around us. In the example of “fossil graveyards” described above, the law of non-contradiction proves that one of these interpretations is incorrect. Either fossil graveyards were produced by slow evolutionary processes or by quick catastrophic methods (Biblical Flood Model). There is no such thing as a slow catastrophic process. Since these views are competing and contradictory they ~ 35 ~
  • 37. cannot possibly be both true at the same time. Because interpretations of past events often contradict each other, a choice is made to believe an interpretation that is in support of the individual's personal worldview (review figure 2:3). Someone who rejects theories based on their own worldview, rather than scientific experimentation, is engaging in religion, not science. There are many extremely religious evolutionary scientists who do not follow the science, but only accept explanations that support their own philosophical worldview. To be fair, Biblical creationists have their own philosophical worldview to uphold, but this is the main point of the argument; both evolutionists and Biblical creationists are religiously motivated, and thus, defend a religious viewpoint. “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.” 4 Science and Causality The Law of Cause-and-Effect (Causality) is the most established law in science. One cannot even conduct science without acknowledgement of this law5. The Law itself states that there is a relationship between two events; the second (the effect) is dependent upon the first (the cause). A further extension of this law states that the cause must always exceed (be larger in extent) than its effect. Figure 2:4 Notice that each effect is dependent upon the preceding cause and that each effect is quantitatively and qualitatively smaller than the preceding cause. ~ 36 ~
  • 38. Again, using the “fossil graveyard” scenario as an example, we can determine that there must have been an extremely great cause (very large in extent) that brought about the effect of thousands of fossils being buried together. Therefore, this law seems to rule out a slow-and-steady, one-fossil-at-a-time event, as evolution suggests, because the effect is far too great for such an individually small cause. The Biblical explanation of a global flood, however, would have been a sufficiently large cause to produce the effect of a “fossil graveyard”. We can also extend the Law of Causality to life itself and all other realms of science. In fact, the causal relationship is the backbone of all scientific pursuits. Since living organisms are composed of complex components with inter-related parts, the cause must have ~ 37 ~
  • 39. been more complex (intelligent) than the effect. This might be called the teleological argument. Other cause-and-effect arguments are outlined below. Extension of the Law Argument of Cause-and-Effect6 ...uses order and design in nature to prove the existence of a Designer. Therefore, if the cell looks designed, then Teleology... there must be a designer that created the cell. …focuses on the motion of the cosmos as evidence of a prime mover. Therefore, if the cosmos has motion, then Cosmology... there must have been a Creator that set it in motion. ...is the study of existence. Therefore, if the concept of Ontology... God exists, then God must really exist. ...is the study of beauty. Therefore, if something can be considered beautiful or expressive in quality, then there Aesthetics... must be an ultimate expression of beauty. ...is the study of desire and will. Therefore, if individual humans have a will, then there must be an ultimate will. Volition... ...is the study of a “right” and a “wrong”. Therefore, since all people know intuitively that there is “good” Morality... and “bad”, “right and wrong”, then there must be an absolute standard of morality. Although the cause-and-effect deductions above are not absolute proof of God's existence, they certainly lead to a strong concluding argument for the existence of a “Grand Cause”. This possibility ~ 38 ~
  • 40. increases further when one considers that evolution runs in direct opposition to causality. For example, if evolution were true, then all complex organisms on this planet evolved from an infinite number of less complex organisms in the past. Evolution must move in the wrong direction. Evolutionists are forced to admit that many of the processes that must have occurred, in order for evolution to be true, are counter to the basic laws that run the universe. The laws of logic are not friendly toward evolution either. “The faith of the evolutionist and humanist is of another order altogether. His is a splendid faith indeed, a faith not dependent on anything so mundane as evidence or logic, but rather a faith strong in childlike trust, relying wholly on omniscient Chance and omnipotent Matter to produce the complex systems and mighty energies of the universe. The evolutionist's faith is not dependent on evidence, but is pure faith – absolute credulity.”7 However, the Law of Cause-and-Effect taken to the furthest degree argues perfectly for the existence of God, since a Grand Cause is a necessary conclusion. Figure 2:5 Notice that complexity is maintained or lost (because of mutational events) but not gained. This supports the conclusion that all causes are greater (or at least equal to) their effects. However, in each case, evolution must defy the law of causality and build complex structures from more simple structures. This is the reverse of the cause-and-effect relationship and is not scientifically possible. ~ 39 ~
  • 42. Because evolutionists claim to function only in the realm of our physical senses, it is often claimed that God does not exist (or at least is undetectable) since He is not seen, felt, or tasted. This claim makes two fatal errors. The first error demands that God must present Himself in visible form before we can accept His existence. The person who claims this has the audacity to tell God that He must play by their rules. We have no right to limit God to his own creative products. The second error assumes that we cannot see God, but God's effects are “clearly seen” (Romans 1), and so, we can detect God's existence by our physical senses when we see His effects. Therefore, to argue against the existence of God because He is unseen is to argue against all unseen causes. Intuitively, we know that even if the cause is unseen, it still exists. It is no different with the existence of God. The effects of God are enough to conclude His existence. The Effects of God Since the world is a collection of individual effects, each effect must have been produced by a greater cause than itself. Obviously, these individual effects could not have extended indefinitely in the past or their present effects would be too small to detect and no longer even measurable. Likewise, the causes that produced the effects could neither extend indefinitely in the past or they would become too large to be measured. The infinite existence of the cause-and-effect relationship cannot be defended scientifically. Once again, the most logical conclusion is that there must have been an initial cause, or First Cause, to the effects that we observe today. ~ 41 ~
  • 43. Furthermore, we can conclude from the cause-and-effect relationship that “the First Cause.... ….of limitless space must be infinite in extent. ….of endless time must be eternal in duration. ….of perpetual motion must be omnipotent in power. ….of unbounded variety must be omnipresent in phenomena. ….of infinite complexity must be omnipotent in intelligence. ….of consciousness must be personal. ….of feeling must be emotional. ….of will must be volitional. ….of ethical values must be moral. ….of religious values must be spiritual. ….of beauty must be aesthetic. ….of righteousness must be holy. ….of justice must be just. ….of love must be loving. ….of life must be living.”8 If the list of “must be” requirements above sounds familiar; they are! Added together, these “must be” requirements for the “First Cause” perfectly describe the God of the Bible as was discussed in the first chapter. Could evolution produce complex thought and feelings such as love, joy, pain, and jealousy? “It makes no sense that unfeeling, unthinking, dead matter could produce feeling, thinking, living beings, and yet that is what people are expected to believe”9 from the theory of evolution. Indeed, there is no possible way that personality could come from an impersonal universe. ~ 42 ~
  • 44. Creation Is the Only Logical Belief System Since logic is a non-material (or non-physical) thing, it must exist outside of our own brains. Furthermore, since all humans recognize and use the same logical rules, it is neither a product of the individual mind. An evolutionist must account naturally for a non-material law that governs the way the material (and all of science for that matter) works. This of course means that laws must have come before the material and biological world; since they are both regulated and upheld by these laws. Laws cannot evolve. Since logic exists outside of the material and because it is universally applied, it must be an expression of a greater mind than our own. God is that greater mind! Logic exists because God exists. Without God, there is no logic and there is no science. God created the laws that allow us to be logical. Because the laws that allow us to be logical are not physical things, we must believe in them. Therefore the laws of logic are presuppositions that we hold to be true. Every scientist (and all people) believes these laws are true (holds to this presupposition), otherwise they would not be able conduct science at all. Whether you believe in God or not, every day you confirm God's existence by using logical reasoning skills. Therefore, an evolutionist proves the existence of God daily, even while trying to deny Him. Jason Lisle, in his book The Ultimate Proof of Creation, summarizes it this way, “If evolution were true, science and reasoning would not be possible; there would be no basis for logic, nor would there be any basis for uniformity in nature. So if evolutionists were consistent with their worldview, they would not be able to reason or do science. Yet evolutionists are able to reason and to do science. Thus it follows ~ 43 ~
  • 45. that evolutionists do not consistently rely upon their own worldview. They rely upon creationist presuppositions.”10 We are all biased! Logic is the most basic level of true knowledge that God gave each of us at birth. We intuitively use logic daily, but as we have determined already, a belief system is needed in order to use logic effectively. As a Christian, I believe that God is who He said He is. I believe the Bible is true and accurate in its history. I believe the Bible describes the character of God perfectly; without any error. I also believe that the Bible, although not a science textbook, is completely accurate when it speaks about scientific matters. This is my presupposition, and everything written in this book is written with this presupposition in mind. Therefore, this book is completely biased and I admit this with all honesty and without any hesitation. Of course, anyone reading this book also has personal biases. Your bias might agree with my bias, or it may not. None of us are neutral on any topic. It is important that we are honest and open about our biases. It may be that our biases are incorrect and that a different bias provides a better interpretation and explanation. I have evaluated my bias many times and in the end I agree with Cornelius Van Til when he expressed his sentiment this way, “Now, in fact, I feel that the whole of history and civilization would be unintelligible to me if it were not for my belief in God. So true is this, that I propose to argue that unless God is back of everything, you cannot find meaning in anything.”11 ~ 44 ~
  • 46. Ask yourself these questions as they relate to the origin of life and answer them honestly. (1) What are your biases about the origin of life? (2) Are your biases sufficient to explain the space-mass-time cosmos of this universe? (3) If your bias is not sufficient to explain the space-mass-time cosmos, are you willing to accept another bias that is more sufficient? These are great questions for anyone to ask themselves. I can honestly say that I believe that my bias (the God of the Bible is the Creator) is the only legitimate bias to have. I know that this statement might challenge and offend those who have a different bias, but is it not true that someone's bias must be the correct bias. Therefore, each of us should be asking ourselves how we can know which bias is the correct bias to have. The reason that I can be so bold about my bias is not because I feel superior about myself but because I feel my God is superior. I believe that all other biases are not capable of logical interpretation. The biblical presupposition allows me to have reason to trust my own logical conclusions. This is because my logic has a true foundational basis in the God who created the laws that govern logic. My logic is in perfect agreement with God's laws. An atheistic evolutionist believes neither God nor the Bible are true, and because of this, has no explanation for the existence ~ 45 ~
  • 47. of logic. Remember, logic cannot evolve. Why would an evolutionist trust his own evolved brain to come to a logical conclusion about anything? When an evolutionist says that the world evolved, why should he even trust his own thoughts? There is no logical way for an evolutionist to defend his own belief. An evolutionist must borrow from the biblical framework of belief (that there are absolutes) in order to use logic affectively. This is why evolutionists can never truly be logical. We, as humans, can only be logical because God is the God of logic and He created us in His image.12 Denying the God of logic makes one completely illogical. This is why I can be so bold in my statement. Suppressing the Truth In the book of Romans we find a perfect portrayal of this entire chapter. Romans 1 (verses18-20) states, The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God‟s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. This passage makes it absolutely clear that everyone knows that God exists because God is plain to them. You might question what is so plain to everyone. The next verse explains what is plain to everyone; God‟s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen. How can you see invisible ~ 46 ~
  • 48. qualities? God's invisible qualities are the very laws that govern the way that all living things work and function. So, you can see the invisible qualities of God when you see the effects of the laws that God created. It is God's eternal power and divine nature that keeps everything functioning as it does. Nothing in this universe, galaxy, planet, body, cell, molecule, or even atom, would function without God's laws in place. He upholds everything by His power. God's eternal power is so forcefully evident that all people are without excuse. This means that God has given us enough evidence of His own existence from His creation alone. God created us with brains that could perceive Him through his laws, that govern both the created world and thought itself, and He expects us to come to this logical conclusion; that He exists. Those who state that there is no God are doing so out of their own presupposition, not because of lack of evidence. The next verse (21) states this clearly, For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles. Everyone knows God exists, some however, choose to deny His existence anyway! “Men cannot long be satisfied with chaos, however. Each person is so conditioned by all his observations and experiences to think in terms of causation and purpose that he must, even despite himself, look for some kind of ultimate order and meaning in the universe. If he has lost faith in the true God, and His Word, then he must sooner or later find another god.”13 An atheist, by denying God's existence, has convinced himself there is no God, but in actuality he has deified himself as god, and thus has exchanged the glory of the immortal ~ 47 ~
  • 49. God for images made to look like a mortal human being. As the verse states, their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools... The Bible explains that those who do not believe in God are fools because they exchange God's logic for foolish arguments (evolution), all the while trying to deny the existence of God by using the very logic that God created them to use to know Him. This is the pinnacle of foolish thinking. The progression of foolishness from Romans 1 is outlined below. God is known by all→He is denied because of personal presuppositions→Ability to make logical sense of the world is lost→ Becomes a fool→Heart is darkened→God's glory is exchanged and given to a false god or self→God's wrath is released on foolish man. The progression of wisdom is outlined below. God is known by all→He is accepted as the only God→Has the ability to make logical sense of the world→Becomes wise→Gives glory only to God→God's approval and happiness is felt and known completely. Which progression above would you place yourself in? If you acknowledge God as Creator, you are seeking true wisdom; however, if you deny God as Creator your thinking is based on ~ 48 ~
  • 50. foolishness. If the latter is the case, it is not too late to accept Jesus and seek God's wisdom. Conclusion At the conclusion of this chapter there are three important points to re-state. (1) The battle between evolution and creation is really a battle between religious beliefs and worldviews, not scientific evidences. (2) “True reason and true science will lead to God, but man does not want to submit to God and, therefore, denies the evidence of his own reason.”14 (3) Logic only has a basis in the Biblical Worldview. It is a peculiar thing that some people, who neither believe in God, nor creation, still claim that logic could exist. The fact of the matter is that logic has no basis outside of a Creator God. In the next chapter we will learn more about the Creator of all things. Notes and references: 1 Although evidence is neutral, we are never neutral. All of us have presuppositions that determine the way we interpret evidence. Jesus Himself confirms this when he said, Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters. (Luke 11:23) Personal neutrality is an impossible position. ~ 49 ~
  • 51. 2 Richard Lewontin, “Billions and billions of Demons,” The New York Review, January 9, 1997, p. 31. 3 It should also be noted that anyone who believes that absolute truth and absolute reality do not exist is inconsistent in their belief. For example, anyone who tries to deny the absolute reality of gravity will meet the absolute truth of death when they jump from a 20 story building. Everyone must live and behave daily in ways that assume the existence of both absolute truth and absolute reality, and therefore, those who deny it are living in direct contradiction to their denial of it. 4 Michael Ruse,”Saving Darwinism from the Darwinians,” National Post, May 13, 2000, B-3. 5 Using the scientific method, scientists set up experiments to determine causality in the physical world. Imbedded within the scientific method and experiments is a hypothesis or several hypotheses about causal relationships. The scientific method is used to test these hypotheses. 6 This chart has been compiled from information appearing in Morris(3), pg. 109. 7 Morris (5), pg. 22. 8 Morris (3), pg. 112. 9 Morris (3), pg. 123. 10 Lisle, Jason. The Ultimate Proof of Creation, Green Forest: Master Books, 2009. 11 Van Til, Cornelius. Christian Apologetics, Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing Company, 2003. 12 Genesis 1:26; The “image of God” is not a physical image, as if we look like God‟s physical body. Rather, the “image of God” represents a “mental, moral, and social likeness“. (see Made in the image of God by Russell M. Grigg, http://creation.com/made-in-the-image-of-god. Creation Ministries International.) 13 Morris (3), pg. 124. 14 Morris (3), pg. 124. Figure 2:1 – Illustration recreated from... Chittick, Donald E. Ph.D. The Puzzle of Ancient Man. Newberg: Creation Compass, 2006. ~ 50 ~
  • 52. Do you not know? Have you not heard? The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He will not grow tired or weary, and his understanding no one can fathom. Isaiah 40:28 ~ 51 ~
  • 53. Chapter 3 The God of Creation The Necessity of a Creator Logic has proven the necessity of a Creator! The theory of evolution has no logical basis to defend itself, therefore, evolutionists are forced to adopt one of two positions; (1) admit their own worldview cannot possibly make sense of the universe and adopt the Christian worldview which can make sense of the universe, or (2) admit their own worldview is illogical and cease from using logical thought processes to explain their theory. Evolutionists, of course, will not easily adopt either position for obvious reasons. Evolutionists have placed themselves then in an impossible position from which there is no escape; either use God's laws of logic to deny God's existence (which actually proves His existence) or deny their own rational minds and abandon logic altogether (which would prove evolution a baseless opinion in a sea of nothingness). God makes it plain that those who deny His ~ 52 ~
  • 54. existence are fools; The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” (Psalm 14:1) Denying God makes evolutionists (and evolutionary based religions)1 hopelessly illogical and completely dependent upon the Christian worldview to make sense of the world. The universe demands a Creator and our reasoning is dependent upon His existence. The cosmos and its space-mass-time tri-unity was not always in existence, as some evolutionists and most other religions suspect2, but had to be created by an ultimate Grand Cause, which, as we discussed in the last chapter, can be none other than the God of the Bible. Who else has the ability and power to bring everything into existence but the God of the Bible? In fact, the space-mass-time continuum is mentioned in the very first verse of the Bible (Genesis 1:1); In the beginning (time)...God (the Grand Cause)...created (brought about for the first time)...the heavens (space)...and the earth (matter or mass). Evolution is completely dependent upon the pre-existence of the cosmos which must have been in place before evolution could function. Only the Bible explains the origin of the cosmos adequately. So, yet once more, evolution (and other religions) must acknowledge the Truth of the Bible in order to make sense of their own beliefs. There is no escaping this simple conclusion. (This would be a good time to review the characteristics of God discussed in the first chapter.) Figure 3:1 The Cosmos (Space-Mass-Time) must have been created at the same time. We observe that energy acts on matter as it occupies space over a given time. The functioning of the universe is set precisely on the interactions of these three components. Evolution must assume that the cosmos spontaneously began or that space, mass, and time evolved independently from each other. Since the cosmos is non-living, evolutionary mechanisms cannot be used in its formation. Evolution cannot explain the existence of the Space-Mass-Time continuum. ~ 53 ~
  • 55. Ex Nihilo It is clear from the text above (Genesis 1:1) that God created the cosmos. The biblical verb used in this verse (Bara; ‫ )בָּרא‬means to ָּ create out of nothing (Latin ex nihilo) or to bring about something that is completely new in quality. We, of course, have never created anything new that hasn't already existed previously. We can only form or manufacture something from pre-existing materials, but these materials were ultimately created by God. In the Bible, the verb used “to form” (yatsar; ‫ יָּצַר‬and sometimes asah; ‫ )עשָּה‬is a different verb than is the verb used “to create” (Bara), ָּ although they are sometimes used of God interchangeably. The clear teaching of Genesis 1:1 is that God did not form the cosmos from materials that were already in existence but He created everything ex nihilo.3 ~ 54 ~
  • 56. Obviously, mere processes have no abilities to create either. Processes can only shape and reform, but not create. Take for example the process of natural selection. Natural selection can only preserve traits (characteristics) that are beneficial to the organism, but it can never create new traits. As has been noted many times, natural selection might be able to explain the “survival of the fittest” but not the “arrival of the fittest”. Actually, natural selection is a process that supports the biblical conservation of “Kinds” better than evolution's use of natural selection to produce new and novel types of organisms. God evidentially instituted natural selection as a conservation process to maintain and sustain his created order. (See the section Thermodynamics and Evolution and Biblical Kinds in this chapter.) Creation Is No Longer Happening The first verse of the Bible also proves that the creation was completed in the past and is not a continuous event. In the beginning God created... and therefore, is not still creating. This “creating process” ended at the end of the creation week (See the section Formative Works of God in this chapter.) when God pronounced, Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all their vast array. By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work. Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating that he had done (Genesis 2:1). The combination of completed-finished-rested could signal no other logical conclusion than, creation is no longer happening. ~ 55 ~
  • 57. This fact rules out any possible merger of the creation event described in the Bible and the theory of evolution4. Evolution suggests a continual progression of small incremental creations, whereas, the Bible presents the creation event as already completed, therefore, the law of non-contradiction proves the impossibility that both of these conflicting views are correct. Although the “creating” came to a conclusion after the sixth day, God put into place two sustaining laws that would govern His creation. These sustaining laws are the laws of 1st and 2nd thermodynamics. (See the section Thermodynamics and Evolution in this chapter.) God Created Instantly Two verses later (Genesis 1:3) we notice another remarkable fact; God created instantaneously. And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. God simply spoke light into existence. The power of His Word brought about everything. So, once again, evolution is denied explicitly in these verses. Because the creation was completed instantaneously in the past, evolution's slow-and- steady change could not possibly be a mechanism that God used to bring about the cosmos. God does not contradict Himself. God Is Not The Cosmos It should also be noted that the subject of this first verse is God (In the beginning God) and that He created the heavens and the earth. This eliminates the possibility that God was a part of the cosmos itself. God did not create Himself or bring about an essence of ~ 56 ~
  • 58. Himself. He created something entirely new; something that never existed before and something that was separate in quality from Himself. In short, God is not the cosmos and the cosmos is not God, nor did the cosmos pre-exist God but it was God who pre- existed the cosmos. As you see, the first verse of the Bible is the most conclusive and precise statement that has ever been uttered. In this one verse we can conclude the following:  God is the Grand Cause.  God is not the same as the cosmos (space-mass-time) or contained within it.  God pre-existed before the cosmos.  God is the only one who can “create” anything and He did so ex nihilo.  God's creation was completed in the past.  God created instantaneously by His powerful Word. Creation Has Documented History Because God is the Creator and speaks nothing but Truth, we can trust what He says about His own creation. After all, He was the only eye-witness to the creation event and so, historically, we have all the reason to believe in God's own description as first hand evidence. It must be pointed out that the theory of evolution is not able to provide such a witness. Its history is not from an eye- witness account like the biblical explanation, but pieced together ~ 57 ~
  • 59. using hypothetical words such as “what if”, “perhaps”, and “maybe”. These are hardly scientific words and they leave no confidence in the end of the matter. The Bible, on the other hand is definite. There is no hesitation in describing the precise order and manner in which God created the world. The Bible does not leave us with cloudy, half-descriptive words like evolution does; on the contrary, we are presented with a confident self-assertion of God as the Grand Cause and designer of all things. The first three chapters of the Bible are a play-by-play of God's actions to create the material, biological and spiritual dimensions of our world and although they do not describe every single detail of the creation, they do present a more than satisfying account for the existence of the universe. G.K. Chesterton could not have said it better when he remarked, “The riddles of God proved more satisfying than the answers proposed without God.”5 The Bible never tries to prove that God is the Creator, rather it is assumed from the beginning. Since God is the author of the Bible this makes perfect sense. God does not need to provide an apologetic of His own existence, rather, the creation itself provides a more than adequate witness to His own power, order, and wisdom. Those who do not accept God's silent witness of Himself (General Revelation) will never accept His verbal witness of Himself (Special Revelation). The General Revelation God's creation might be called a “general revelation” because everyone has received the same evidence. We all wake to the same ~ 58 ~
  • 60. sun and conclude our day with the same moon. We all observe the change of seasons, the cycles in nature, the complexities of life, and perceive the world from our special senses. God makes it clear that the creation alone is enough evidence to know He exists. As was discussed in chapter 2, Romans 1:20 declares, For since the creation of the world God‟s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. Psalm 19 (verses 1-4) portrays this sentiment perfectly as well, The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they reveal knowledge. They have no speech, they use no words; no sound is heard from them. Yet their voice goes out into all the earth, their words to the ends of the world. No one on this planet can say, “God has not given me enough evidence to believe that He exists.” Clearly, His universe is shouting to all who will listen that He is the mind behind the matter. From the creation alone we can determine a few attributes of God‟s character. We can determine that God is orderly and uniform and very creative. The question that all of us face is, from where did the order and uniformity of the physical universe come from? An illogical position would be to accept that a random, purposeless, and unguided process like evolution could account for the order and design of the universe. To not believe in a Creator is to deny cause-and-effect relationships and reality itself. Evolutionists must deny this obvious reality each day as they are forced to fabricate fantastic stories to account for the order and uniformity of the universe through natural processes alone. Evolutionists, however, know in their hearts that God is real and this is ~ 59 ~
  • 61. represented by their incessant deification and personification of evolution in order to attribute the order and design of the universe to something greater than themselves. The next time you read an article written from an evolutionary perspective look for descriptions like assembled themselves, constructed, built, manufactured, emerged, arose, burst onto the scene, modified itself, was lucky, and created. These descriptive terms are used to explain how sheer molecules can manipulate natural processes to become more complex in structure and function. Not only is this contrary to established laws of science (See Thermodynamics and Evolution in this chapter.), but it is dishonest. These are subtle attempts to circumvent God by giving evolution abilities that only God can possess. It is at moments like this that evolutionists reveal their own inner battle with the evidence. They must either deny the apparent design of nature or attribute it to evolution in God-like fashion. It is impossible to deny the apparent design of the universe; therefore, evolutionists attribute the evidence of design to evolution (their god) or try in vain to deny the undeniable; as leading Darwinist Richard Dawkins does in his book Climbing Mount Improbable when he states that evolution “...has only the appearance of being intelligently designed.”6 Or in similar scope, as Francis Crick puts it “Biologists must constantly keep in mind what they see was not designed, but evolved.”7 Obviously (though these statements are supposedly in favor of evolutionary theory) statement such as these provide first-hand evidence of the crisis that evolutionists face. These sorts of comments reek of montra- like pronouncements hoping in vain to wish-away the obvious fact that things exhibit order and uniformity, which are features of design and henceforth, demand a Designer. ~ 60 ~
  • 62. In the end, an evolutionist's own words prove that he knows and perceives the God of the Bible through His creation but, as Romans 1:20 declares, he is …suppressing the Truth. “God has so made man that he intuitively recognizes God's existence, at least until his training or religious traditions have educated it out of him.”8 In summary, there are two obvious qualities of the general revelation that are understood by all; (1) its apparent order and (2) uniformity in design. It is from these two that the first steps toward knowing and understanding God must be met. Evolution cannot explain the existence of either. “It is no accident that at every level of the cosmos–sub-atomic, atomic, organic, inorganic, sub-human, human, earth, moon, sun, stars, galaxies–all things manifest amazing order and rationality that can be reasonably explained only as the result of a deliberate, creative act of God.” 9 The Special Revelation In the Christian worldview, general revelation is enough to condemn, but not enough to save. In other words, to admit that there is a Creator does not mean that one has been pardoned from their sin nor does it mean that they have received God's Salvation. The Bible declares ...You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder (James 2:19). Obviously, demons have not been pardoned from their sin, nor received God's Salvation. It takes more than a concept of a Creator to receive Salvation. ~ 61 ~
  • 63. Since, the general revelation is only enough to prove God's existence, He provided a greater revelation that speaks of His character and divine nature. This greater revelation is often called the “special revelation” and is none other than the Bible. “In the Bible, the reader meets God's most direct form of special revelation: the person of Jesus Christ.” 10 God then, wants ...all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all people (1 Timothy 2:4-6). Unfortunately, evolution has deceived many into believing that there is no God, and therefore, the special revelation is ignored because the general revelation is denied. If the general revelation is denied then the hope of salvation is lost, because it is in the special revelation that Jesus Christ is revealed. (See Chapter 6, The God of Salvation). The Triumph of God's Special Revelation “It is better theology and philosophy to begin with the God of the Bible to explain the universe than to begin with the universe to explain God.”11 This is true because the general revelation can be misinterpreted. As we discussed in the last chapter, man's presuppositions may lead him to an interpretation of the evidence that denies God's existence. This is why an evolutionist can look at evidence that clearly supports a Creator and yet, deny that He exists. Secondly, as will be discussed in the next chapter (The God of Man), the entire creation is subject to decay. This is a result of ~ 62 ~
  • 64. the “Fall of Man” which not only affected man's relationship with God but also introduced pain, suffering, and decay into the physical world. Anyone who denies the special revelation will miss these explanations and thus, will likely misinterpret the evidence. Only with the Bible as the primary interpretation tool can we successfully comprehend the world around us. In a sense, our minds are corrupted and need to be purified. Only the Bible can purify them. Evolutionists begin with the wrong presupposition (no God), restrict themselves to the general revelation only, and use their corrupted minds to interpret evidence. No wonder their conclusion is incorrect. (You might want to review the Progression of Foolishness at the end of Chapter 2.) Not only can man never arrive at a correct interpretation of the physical world without the Bible, he can never answer the “big” questions without it either. The general revelation might help us answer the “temporal” questions of life; it does little to help us answer the “eternal” questions of life. For instance, only God's special revelation can answer the following questions.  Why are we here?  Does God Exist?  Why do men have physical emotions like sadness, happiness, and joy?  How can I be saved?  How can I know God?  Why do I feel guilty when I do bad things? ~ 63 ~
  • 65. It will do little good in the end of it all if you can recite the steps a mitochondria takes to convert sugar to energy, however, if you know the living Savior Jesus Christ, your soul will be saved for eternity. The general revelation is to be acknowledged, and even studied, but if it remains the only source of knowledge for an individual; it and the person's soul will be lost for eternity. The Bible makes it clear that the special revelation triumphs the general revelation. Two verses in the Bible that specifically pinpoints the relationship between God's general and special revelations are Isaiah 40:8 and John 1:1-4. The passage in Isaiah reads, The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of our God endures forever. The grass (general revelation) is temporal, but the Word of God (special revelation) is eternal. Only investments in God's economy (Bible) will pay dividends. This world will pass away but as Jesus says, my words will never pass away (Matthew 13:31). God's Word is eternal because the Word (Jesus) is God, and of course, God is eternal. The passage in John mentioned above explains the relationship thus, In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. It is necessary that we breakdown this verse. (1) In the beginning... This represents the origin of the cosmos. Refer to the discussion of Genesis 1:1 at the beginning of this chapter. ~ 64 ~
  • 66. (2) was the Word... The Word is Jesus. In Greek, Logos (λόγος) can mean mind, reason, thought, wisdom, intelligence, idea, law, order, purpose, and design.12 All of these attributes converge in Jesus. Maybe the best translation for Logos is the “Mind of God”. Therefore, Jesus is the Mind of God expressed in a physical body. Logos is also the root for the English word Logic. So in essence, when we use logic to reason we are confirming Jesus as the One and only true expression of God. (3) and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Jesus is eternal and not separate from God; He is God. (See the explanation for the Trinity at the end of chapter 1.) (4) Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. Jesus is the Creator and He holds all things together by His power. It is through Jesus that all things abide. (See also Colossians 1:15-17.) (5) In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. True life can only be found in Jesus Christ alone. He came to this world to shed light in darkness. Unfortunately, many still live in darkness because they are deceived by philosophies that lead them away from Jesus Christ, the “Light of the World” (John 3:19 and John 8:12). “The flow of this passage sets forth the parameters of Christian philosophy: mind before matter; God before man; plan and design before creation; life from life; and enlightenment from the Light. The orderly universe was conceived in the orderly and rational ~ 65 ~
  • 67. mind of God before it was created. Without the Logos there would be no cosmos.” 13 As you see, the special revelation of God is Jesus Christ Himself who is revealed in the Word of God, and is the Word of God. Why is the special revelation necessary for Salvation? It is because, Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved (Acts 4:12). The Works of God Since God Created the world we can now turn to the specific manner to which the Creation took place. We can divide the creation process into two separate events; (1) creative (Bara) and (2) formative (Asah and Yatsar). Creative Works of God 14  Creation of the physical elements of the universe-space, mass, energy, time (Genesis 1:1).  Creation of conscious life (Hebrew Nephesh), including both soul and spirit (in the sense of “breath”). Animals possess components of both the created physical elements and conscious life (Genesis 1:21).  Creation of human beings in the image of God. Men and women are tri-unities of body, soul, and spirit (in the sense of the divine image). The human body is much more complex than that of the highest animal, as is the human soul/breath complex. Only men and women possess, in addition, the ~ 66 ~
  • 68. image of God (Genesis 1:27). Figure 3:2 The illustration below shows the formative days of Creation. This illustration is the logo for Creation Education Ministries of Thailand (CEMT). Formative Works of God 14  Day One: Energizing the cosmos, as centered in the light energy (Genesis 1:2-5)  Day Two: Formation of the atmosphere (“firmament”) and hydrosphere, both of which are necessary for life and are unique to earth among the planets (Genesis 1:6-8).  Day Three: Formation of the lithosphere (the solid earth) and biosphere (earth's cover of vegetation), a necessity for animal ~ 67 ~
  • 69. life (Genesis 1:9-13).  Day Four: Formation of astrosphere in a different “firmament” (Hebrew raqia, referring to an “expanse” of stretched-out place), including all the stars, galaxies and planets (Genesis 1:14-19).  Day Five: Formation of different kinds of animals for the atmosphere (birds) and hydrosphere (fishes), each to reproduce only “after its kind” (Genesis 1:20-23).  Day Six: Formation of different kinds of land animals for the lithosphere and biosphere, as well as one male body and one female body (Adam and Eve) to serve as progenitors of all later human beings (Genesis 1:24-31).  Day Seven: Completion and sanctification of “all the work which God created and made” (Genesis 1:31-2:3). The order described above accords perfectly with the observable biological world. There are no contradictions present neither in the order nor in the descriptions of organisms created. In fact, the order presented above is far superior to any hypothesized evolutionary development of the species through millions of years of random mutations. It must be noted, however, that the order of the creation events described in the Bible does not agree with modern evolutionary theory. It is absolute absurdity to suggest that the process of evolution and the Creation event in the Bible could somehow be harmonized. We must remember that the law of non- contradiction strictly forbids the possibility that contradictory theories could both be true. We must conclude then, that either Creation or evolution is logically impossible. ~ 68 ~
  • 70. Evolution Creation Sun before earth Earth before sun Dry land before sea Sea before dry land Sea creatures before land Land plants before sea plants creatures Stars before earth Earth before stars Death before man Man before death Reptiles before birds Birds before reptiles Figure 3:3 This is a sampling of contradictions in the order of appearance on earth. There are hundreds of contradictions between these two beliefs. There is one more very persuasive point to be made in relation to the days of creation described in the Bible. Most (if not all) cultures around the world function on a six day work week with one day rest. Although the day of rest may be different for different cultures, the scenario remains consistent. Henry Morris speaks of this fact when he notes, “The most fascinating aspect of chronology is the history of the “week,” which has no astronomical basis. The “day” is measured by the regular appearance of the sun as the earth rotates; the “year” is measured by the annual rotation of the heavens as the earth orbits the sun; the “month” is measured approximately by the moon's lunations, or intervals between new moons, caused by the revolution of the moon around the earth. The week, however, has no astronomical basis at all, yet people everywhere have always observed a weekly cycle: six days of work and a day of rest.”15 There seems to be no other reasonable ~ 69 ~
  • 71. explanation except that in all cultures of the world there remains a remnant of the true creation week, passed down through the ages and modified in different cultures, but nevertheless still present in basic form. In the observation of the week itself there is a silent but powerful witness that confirms, ...in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy (Exodus 20:11). Thermodynamics and Evolution Besides the Law of Causality, mentioned extensively in the previous chapter, there are two other laws that are intriquatly related to the created world. These laws are the 1st and 2nd Laws of Thermodynamics, or more commonly the law of conservation of energy and the law of increased entropy. After God created the space-mass-time cosmos it is evident that He set in place these laws to sustain His created world. “In its simplest form, the First Law of Thermodynamics states that neither matter nor energy can be created or destroyed. The amount of energy in the universe is constant – energy can be changed, moved, controlled, stored, or dissipated. However, this energy cannot be created from nothing or reduced to nothing. Every natural process transforms energy and moves energy, but cannot create or eliminate it. This principle forms a foundation for many of the physical sciences.”16 The second law likewise states that, “Entropy is defined as a measure of unusable energy within a closed or isolated system (the universe for example). As usable energy decreases and unusable energy increases, "entropy" increases. Entropy is also a gauge of ~ 70 ~
  • 72. randomness or chaos within a closed system. As usable energy is irretrievably lost, disorganization, randomness and chaos increase.”17 Both of these laws are extensions of the Law of Causality. We find that energy can change forms but not be completely destroyed. At the same time, energy is becoming less available to biological systems and is therefore contributing to increased disorder in living organisms. These two laws are easily observed in nature, especially the Second Law. For example, as we age our bodies become less able to function at the level it once did. This natural deterioration of our bodies shows that the Second Law affects all aspects of the cosmos as disorder increases over time. Once again, the evolutionary worldview is at a loss to explain the existence of these laws. But it is worse still for an evolutionist because these laws are contradictory to the mechanisms of evolution. So, not only can an evolutionist not explain their existence, their existence disproves evolution. To exemplify just how the Second Law is contrary to evolution consider the origin of life. An evolutionist believes that life began as a single-celled organism. This single-celled organism must have been very basic with few anatomical structures, information (in the form of DNA), or chemical pathways, etc. Therefore, according to an evolutionist this very basic organism must have continually, over millions of years, become more and more complex, until it produced the extremely complex organisms we see today. This required building process for evolution though, is not in agreement with the Second Law. The Second Law explains how organisms are in a state of decline and how they are continually becoming more disordered and disorganized. Evolution demands an upward movement from basic to complex while the Second Law demands ~ 71 ~
  • 73. a downward movement from complex to basic. Obviously, both of these processes cannot be functioning at the same time or they would negate each other and according to the Law of Non- Contradiction, one of these explanations must be invalid. The Second Law is one of the most understood and observed laws in all of science and its consistency in all known realms of science make it a trustworthy law. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about evolution. The Second Law states conclusively that complexity must have existed from the beginning, not built gradually. Complexity from the beginning not only supports the biblical explanation of creation but also is confirmed by science itself, in the Law of Biogenesis (see the next section). ~ 72 ~
  • 74. Figure 3:4 Compare the two graphs above. Notice that the evolutionary model and the Creation model are directly opposite of each other. The Second Law of Thermodynamics clearly supports the Creation model and opposes the evolutionary model. . Life Comes From Life (Omne Vivum Ex Vivo) There is one last law that demands some mention as it relates to the origin of life. As has been discussed previously, evolutionists believe that life came from non-living matter. This is a direct violation of the Law of Biogenesis, which states that life arises from pre-existing life, not from nonliving material. The Law of Biogenesis is an extension of the Law of Cause-and-Effect, in this ~ 73 ~
  • 75. case, “like begets like”. Evolutionists have been forced to propose fairy-tale like stories in order to violate this law. “The evolutionist faces a great temptation here, a serious stumbling block to his faith. It seems utterly impossible that dead matter could create life. At this point, surely, he will have to defer to logic and acknowledge that life must be produced by a Cause which is itself alive. After all, scientists long ago showed experimentally that life comes only from life. Ah, but not so! The evolutionist's faith is strong enough to surmount even this barrier.” 18 As has been shown, evolution is a theory that is contrary to many established laws of science; therefore, it should be examined critically before one believes in its premises. It is not the purpose of this book to identify all of the weaknesses in evolutionary theory (for which there are many) nor give a long list of evidences in favor of biblical creation (for which there are many), but to show the validity and accuracy of the Bible and the dependency of science upon it. Evidence itself can be twisted and turned to one's own worldview and so evidence is a very subjective sort of proof. Nevertheless, in the next few paragraphs several key evidences will be examined and in the end you will see that the biblical creation model far exceeds any evolutionary explanation for the same phenomenon. Biblical Kinds It is a fact of common observation that organisms are very similar in structure and function. We observe that mammals are all similar, birds are all similar, frogs are all similar, and so on. Not ~ 74 ~