Lt. Col. Thomas Woodie, Deputy Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District, gave this presentation on the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project to the Propeller Club, March 14, 2013 in Savannah, Ga.
Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Update - March 14, 2013
1. Savannah Harbor Expansion Project
Presentation To
The Propeller Club
14 March 2013
By Lt. Col. Thomas Woodie
Deputy Commander
Savannah District
US Army Corps of Engineers
BUILDING STRONG®
2. Agenda
Quick Overview of SHEP
Next Steps
Designs for First Features
Construction Timeline
Questions
2 BUILDING STRONG®
3. Existing Project
42-ft Navigation Channel
32.7 miles long
7 Turning Basins
7 Confined Disposal Facilities, 5,305 ac
Offshore Dredged Material Disposal Site, 4.26 sq mi
Freshwater Control System
Depth and tide restricted
Garden City Terminal
• 4th largest container port in US
• 2nd largest container port on East Coast US
• Largest single terminal in North America BUILDING STRONG®
3
• Fastest growing container port in the Nation since 2001
4. SHEP Bottom Line Up Front
NED & Selected Plan is the 47-foot alternative
• Yields $174 M in total annual net benefits
• Project First Cost $652 M at FY 12 price levels
• Benefit to Cost Ratio of 5.5 to 1
• Annual O&M costs increase from $22 M to $27 M
• Environmental impacts can be mitigated to an acceptable level
The CMA CGM FIGARO (8500 TEUs)
4 BUILDING STRONG®
5. Project Objectives
Improve the efficiency of moving goods through Savannah Harbor
Reduce tidal constraints
Avoid, minimize and mitigate impacts to maximum practicable extent
4,600 TEUs 8,200 TEUs
5 BUILDING STRONG®
7. Summary of Environmental Effects
Project features adequately mitigate for:
Loss of 16 AC brackish marsh (0.85 in SC)
Conversion of tidal marshes
• 223 AC freshwater marsh to brackish marsh
(none in SC)
• 740 AC salt marsh to brackish marsh
(563 in SC)
Loss of fish habitat
• 7% loss in shortnose sturgeon winter habitat
• 10% loss in striped bass spawning habitat
Impacts to dissolved oxygen
Impacts to drinking water
Other project effects:
Gain in southern flounder habitat (57%)
Gains in dissolved oxygen
7 BUILDING STRONG®
8. Economics Overview
TEU Projections 2030 Container Fleet
(6,500,000 TEUs)
Garden City Terminal Reaches Maximum TEU through-put Capacity in 2030
With deepening, increased proportions of
more efficient Post-Panamax Generation II
vessels call at Savannah
8 BUILDING STRONG®
9. 47’ NED Selected Plan
Value to the Nation
- 4th largest container port in US
- Largest single terminal operation in North America
- Fastest growing container port in the Nation for the last 10 years
- 2.92M TEU through-put in 2011
- Supports in GA over 352,000 jobs, $18.5B in income and $2.5B
in state and local taxes annually
- Supports in SC over 19,700 jobs, $959M in income, $147M in
state and local taxes annually
- $66.9B in GA revenue (9% of GA total sales) annually
- $4.3B in SC revenue (1.3% of SC total sales) annually
Project Information
- Deepen from 42’ to 47’ NED selected plan
- $652M Total First Cost (FY 12 Price Levels)
- $311M Total Mitigation Cost
- 70% Federal 29% Non-Federal Cost Share:
- $174M Annual Net Benefits
-Benefits Derived From Increased Transportation
Efficiencies
- 5.5:1 @ 4% (discount rate) Benefit to Cost Ratio
- Projected to create 11,000+ jobs nationwide
9 BUILDING STRONG®
10. Cost Summary
47’ NED Selected Plan Cost Amount in Millions
Channel modification and dredged material placement $257
Fish, Wildlife & Wetlands mitigation features $221
Other mitigation features $71
Lands Easements Rights of Way Relocations (LERRs) $19
Pre-Eng and Design (including $41M sunk costs) $69
Construction Management $15
Total $652
Note: The project has a Benefit Cost Ratio of 5.5 to 1 and mitigation and environmental features are 47% of the
Project First Cost.
10 BUILDING STRONG®
11. Navigation Features
FEATURE Program Value
Outer Harbor Dredging $81M
Inner Harbor Dredging 157M
USCG Navigation Aids $5M
Disposal Area 14A & B Dike Raising $12M
Additional Dike Raising $8M
BUILDING STRONG®
12. Mitigation Features
FEATURE Program Value
Fish Passage $30M
1S Marsh Restoration $18M
Raw Water Storage Impoundment $26M
Striped Bass Stocking Payment $3M
Dissolved Oxygen Injection System $72M
Monitoring $42M
CSS Georgia Removal $14M
McCoy’s Cut Work $15M
Sediment Basin Work $52M
12 BUILDING STRONG®
13. Progress to Date
April 2012: Release of Final Report
August 2012: Chief of Engineers signs Final Report
October 2012: Record of Decision signed
BUILDING STRONG®
14. What’s Next?
Complete designs for first features
Legal challenges by SELC and SC SRMC
Congressional Approval for Cost Increase (902 limit fix)
Cost Share Agreement (PPA with Georgia)
FY14 is earliest we can expect funding
BUILDING STRONG®
15. Disposal Area 14A & 14B Dike Raisings
Work performed
by USACE
15 BUILDING STRONG®
16. Up River Site
Upper River Site
Dissolved
Oxygen
Injection
Work performed by
Down River Site
16 BUILDING STRONG®
19. CSS Georgia Ordnance
1863 Inventory of Guns
1 EA - 6 Pounder
3 EA – 8-Inch Shell Guns
2 EA – 9-Inch Shell Guns
1 EA – 24-Pounder
4 EA – 32-Pounder Rifles
1986 Dive Operations – Recovered Items
1 EA – 24-Pounder
1EA – 32 Pounder Rifle
Assorted Brooke Projectiles, Percussion Fuses and Spherical Shot
Known Remaining Guns in the Debris Field
2 EA – 32 Pounder Rifles
1 EA – No. 1 Cannon (On Inventory Listed as an 8-Inch Shell Gun)
19 BUILDING STRONG®
29. Summary
Selected Plan (47-foot alternative) is well justified
• Benefit to Cost Ratio of 5.5 to 1
• Project First Cost $652 M at FY 12 levels yields $174 M in total annual benefits
• Annual O&M costs increase from $22 M to $27 M
• Environmental impacts would be mitigated to an acceptable level
Developed a comprehensive mitigation plan ($311M or 47% of project cost)
Includes extensive monitoring and adaptive management
SHEP supports the Administration’s priorities of being protective of the
environment, improving infrastructure, creating jobs, and maintaining global
competitiveness
ASA(CW) signed ROD on 26 October 2012
Need Congress to adjust 902 limit and signed PPA before construction can begin
Designs for first features underway
29 BUILDING STRONG®
31. Learn more on our website:
www.sas.usace.army.mil
31 BUILDING STRONG®
Hinweis der Redaktion
It is not quite accurate in that it shows flow over gate #5, which shouldn't happen at all, and flow under gates #2, 3 and 4, which should only happen during a high flow event. But it does depict the general idea.