1. DanielleCarlock

2.  To bring interactive, hands-on, information
literacy instruction to courses throughout the
College
 Students need hands on, web based training to
learn how to access & evaluate information
 Overcome lack of technology
 Increase student engagement & student effort

3.  16 iPads were funded byTIIP grant
 Faculty offered the option of scheduling library
instruction in their own classroom using iPads.
 A total of 33 iPad sessions were conducted in the
following areas:
Nursing Reading Communications
English Interior Design HRM
Biology Exercise Sci College Success

4.  Information literacy instruction-to teach
students how to:
 Access & evaluate information
 Use information ethically
 Instruction customized to course content,
objectives, and assignments

5.  BIO 181, students learn how to locate peer
reviewed, primary literature in the life
sciences using iPads.
 In COM 100, students learn how to evaluate
websites and collaboratively construct a
Google doc with their results, using iPads

6.  In larger classes, sharing of iPads reduced the
quality of the sessions
 Wifi connectivity

7. on?
LEVEL OF
ENGAGEMENT
PERCENT OF
STUDENTS
0 (not at all engaged) 1%
1 1%
2 1%
3 0%
4 2.9%
5 4.8%
6 12.4%
7 20%
8 17.1%
9 (very engaged) 40%

8. LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT PERCENT OF FACULTY
0 (not at all engaged) 0%
1 0%
2 0%
3 0%
4 16.7%
5 0%
6 0%
7 0%
8 66.7%
9 (very engaged) 16.7%

9. LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT PERCENT OF STUDENTS
Much more engaged 69.5%
A little more engaged 21%
No effect 1.9%
A little less engaged 5.7%
Much less engaged 1%

10. EFFECTIVENESS PERCENT OF STUDENTS
0 (very ineffective) 1.9%
1 0
2 0
3 1.9%
4 6.7%
5 3.8%
6 15.2%
7 11.4%
8 22.9%
9 (very effective) 36.2%

11.  Capability of hands on information literacy
instruction in any classroom environment
 Exposing students to a new technology and
leveraging that technology for the purposes of
student engagement and instructional
effectiveness
 Brought new faculty to information literacy
instruction